I've been using cmos-cooled camera with 3 different telescopes, but time and time again I get pulled back to my DSLR photography, just for the ease of using and taking fantastic photos quickly. Some people think who move beyond a certain level won't touch their "inferior" imaging equipment, but that's not true. I use whatever I feel like and whatever I think is gonna be fun at the time. It doesn't have to be a chore, it's not a job, the only requirement is to have fun whatever you have or whatever you wanna use.
The photos look amazing 😅 i do have the Tamron 70-300mm for my Sony A6000 🙈 - after watching your videos I feel encouraged to make a first try even with a very budget-y setup
Nice vid Walt! I like how you keep it simple. It so easy to get completely lost in the deep, deep rabbit hole that Astrophotography can be. Looking forward to your next upload. Regards from Holland.
After taking a picture of the Orion Nebula, I bought a C5 spotting scope, an iexos-100 tracking mount, then a 150-600mm lens, now wanting a Celestron 9.25, larger.tracking mount... lol it's addictive...
Another great video. Thanks for reminding me about that dummy battery. I use a modified Nikon D810. I also have a Jackery 1000 small generator that I can plug the dummy battery into along with my Adventurer 2i.
Going to try for the Orion Nebula this upcoming weekend with a 70-200 2.8 at a camping trip, thanks for the informative video. The alien bit killed me hahaha.
Thank you for this video and all the tips. Gold... Using Jupiter and its moons to focus is a smart tip that seems to get better chance of success than just trying to narrow down a star to its smallest focus size.
Another excellent video. May I suggest Gaffers tape. Electrical tape can leave a stick residue. Gaffers tape is very strong and never have I seen it leave a residue.
My move shoot move is arriving tomorrow so I'm praying for some clear nights. Thanks for your videos, they really are helping. That is a savage result too on that rig.
I'm new to astrophotography and this is an amazing video to help me get started. Very straightforward. Thank you for the sites to use and I look forward to watching your other videos.
Haven't read any of the comments yet, but in case no one else has said anything, use gaffers tape to fix the focus on your lenses. No residue at all. I use a bright yellow, so that it's easier to see in the dark. ...But don't tape your lenses and think they're set all year long - Nico Carver, aka Nebula Photos, just posted a video on 11-5-21 explaining why infinity focus is variable. Temperature, among other things, can affect infinity focus. Very valuable information in that video.
Oh man, it is 12pm here and I was just about to go out and try to capture the Orion nebula with my Eos 550 and 75-300mm kit lense. This was an amazing timing, thank you! (Btw I'm a beginner, the only thing I attempted so far is the Pleiades)
Great video. A hobby the can keep on giving as long as we "injoy what we DO have" a plain old 10in f4.7 dob for now learning the sky. Pushing the limits and understanding each new found target brings a smile. I injoy the (hunt). be kind be safe and treat others as you hope to be treated.
I tried last month to photograph the Orion Nebula with a DSLR full frame camera and a 70 - 300 lens. The histogram was too far to the left and any longer exposure would have resulted in star trails, so I will have to wait till I save up enough to buy a star tracker. I will continue to use what I have available in my learning process, until it is time to move on to better gear. At 55 deg North, milkyway shots are not going to include the core, so it has to be DS astro for me
Not NASA quality? That was a stunning photo. I appreciate photos like that because it captures the sheer size of the nebulae framed with the stars which can be identified in the constellation.
Thank you so much for your help. Bought a star adventurer 2i. Put on my 24-85 kit lens with the D750. Presto. Orion nebula. Christmas greetings from South Africa
I liked your video, Walt. It's inspired me to do more wide-field astrophotography. There's a lot of beauty out there! I'd also like to know your image processing method as your end result was definitely worth accepting the limitations of your gear. Paul.
dude i just gotta say real quick you are probably my favorite astro content creator. your images are just insane and its so nice to see someone not use a 2000 euro mount with a bomb ass telescope on. i got the same lense quite cheap off of ebay just because of you to be honest haha. love you man
Hi, Nice video and I like that your not using guiding. Ive invested in an omegon clockwork system for its portability to try to find somewhere dark. I think in principle its intended for milkyway shooting but I think I can get ok tracking for 60s with a dslr and a 70-250mm lens so will try and use it at 150-200mm. I know your using a 75-300 lens, but is the camera modified? Regards Chris
Another fantastic, educational, and entertaining video Walt! thank you! I like what you say- photographing is only half the fun. Processing is really what makes or break the photo IMO and you do such a great job in post on all your images.
Super video! Explained everything perfectly to a complete noob such as me. You scared the BGSUS out of me with that mask, I was not expecting that. 😂 Question, if I don’t have a startracker, but an old Canon 400D & a 75-300 f4.5-5.6 lens, could I do 50x 2 sec exposure, re-align, 50x 2 sec exposure, etc. For about 2hrs, or so. Then stack, process, etc. Would I be able to get something similar?
@@MaartenAnna Did you get some astro imaging with that lens? If so, how did it go? I would imagine with an f4.5-5.6 lens and 2 second exposures, you would likely need to use at least 6400iso.
I have the Sony A6000 and was hoping I may be able to get into some deeper space objects than the conventional milky way shots. Any ideas for relatively cheap lens that perform alright?
@@deltaastrophotography That's good to hear. I live in a Bortle 4/5 area. Even with 2-3 hours worth of integration time (which isn't a lot admittedly) my Ha is minimal and comes out noisy if I over process it. Guess I've just got to put more hours in and add a lot more data. I use an unmodded Canon EOS R6. Seeing images like yours inspires people to what can be achieved with minimal equipment.
@@mikecole1337 My next video will be how I processed this image. I'll leave a link to my unprocessed stacked TIFF, so you can see when my data really looks like!
Thank you, so useful, I would like to do this, I have the kit already but so far have just taken wide sky images. How do you find the exact place to point the camera
ive only just recenlty came across ur channel as ive just started to get in to astrophotography! best channel ive found, love how u go in to great detail and explain everything so even a complete noob can understand, u make astrophotography less scary as for a lot of people they wouldnt know where to start, watching ur videos i feel confident and when the rest of my equipment arrives ill be prepared and ready to start shooting the sky! thanks!
Hi, I use instead of tape, 3d printed c-shaped clips. they snap on the tubus of the lens and stop slipping. i have different sizes for different focal lengths (e.g. 100, 135. 200, 300). or you kan use a pvc pipe and cut to the length.
@@sanderreizevoort4143 hi, mine are for a Fuji 70-300 so you have to adjust diameter and lenght according to your lens. I can send them later when i'm back from work. If you still want.
I was on electronic shutter last weekend and the only way I could get the camera to take multiple photos and it stopped after 1 shot. On mechanical shutter it works as you show. Have I screwed up a setting again?
Excellent Walt! I have a canon 75-300 mm and had some success at the same target, but I suffered a little with focus slipping (no tape) so once you have focus how do you tape the focus to hold without moving the lens out of focus? Thanks! Simon
I usually only tape the focal length down. I've never really tried taping the focus. I did get a bahtinov mask for this lens though. It only cost me $13 and I can get great focus at first. Just gotta check for slips from time to time.
@@astrodad-simonb277 yeah and I'm never able to take flats with that lens. I don't want to touch the end of it with a tablet because I'm afraid I might knock the focus out.
I find that old manual film lenses generally have a rather dampened focus ring that provides a bit of resistance. These would be unlikely to slip. I notice the focus rings on a lot of modern AF lenses tend to be 'looser' (for lack of a better term.) Some time back, I shot some light and dark frames of the Large Magellanic Cloud with an old 135mm f2.5 film lens. I haven't stacked them as yet as I'm new to this kind of photography.
Oh also, what tripod would you recommend for the star tracker? I have a tripod with a ball head, but it isn't compatible for the star tracker. Also, if a tripod is good for the SkyWatcher Star Adventurer, is it also good for the iOptron star tracker?
@@deltaastrophotography thank you!! Yeah it is hard to find the SkyWatcher Star Adventurer in stock, and when it is in stock they are asking $550 for it. A year ago, I could find it easy for $400. So, I have the 18-55, nifty fifty, 75-300, and 70-250. Would I need the counterweight kit to use those lenses, specifically the 250 and 300 ones, or can I attach the camera to the star tracker without the counterweight?
LMAO, you were waaaaay too happy with the duct tape...women in your area should be very afraid! Lol, so quick question. Does Telescopium account for the crop size of your focal length when using the canon APSC or whatever it is? So when I put in my focal length, do I need to account for the 1.6 crop or can I just put in the focal length and the software will correct for the 1.6? I hope I am making sense. What I am asking makes sense in my head, lol.
You have to specify your sensor size in Telesopious. I create a profile and input each of my cameras and their sensor sizes. That way when I preview a focal length, I can choose which camera I'm shooting with and it will be accurate.
I too am an amateur astrophotographer, using nikon d3400 along with a 70-300mm lens . I don't have a tracker unfortunately. Any guidance for me to shoot orion ??
You could do stacking with lots of short exposures on a static tripod. Though I would imagine that a 70 - 300mm would have a very small maximum aperture - probably around f4 - 5.6. So you would have to push the iso up insanely high - probably well over 6400 iso.
Why not go to 300mm? I have the same kit lens, but on the Nikon side. I've taken some pretty good images with it, for me (a total beginner). Stacking is fine with DSS but I can not process for shit! I have a Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Pro mount but only can go about 90-105 seconds before I get trailing. Another kool video. And I really appreciate your sense of humor. We need more Gigan sightings! 🤣🤣
Ooo a Godzilla fan! Woo hoo! For me personally, things get a little fuzzy after 200mm with that lens. But if it works for you then go for it! And yeah I can't really get much longer than that without auto-guiding. At least not when I'm shooting around 200mm or more
i would like to get aa intervalometer but my camera only says it uses the wirteless one from nikon is that just what they recommend or will nothing else work anybody know?
The camera in this video is stock. I have a modified T5i, but I've only used it in one video and people complained lol! I'm shooting with my modified camera tonight though!
@@deltaastrophotography thanks for that. I've only just started getting into astrophotography and have an unmodified T8i that I use on a star adventurer or with an evostar 72 ED telescope. And my few shots that I've started to take don't have a lot of range of colours in them. And I was wondering if that was because my camera was unmodified. It's probably also due to my novice editing skills.
Bortle 4/5 from my backyard but 20 mins in the car and I can get to Bortle 2 skies. I just haven't ventured away from home while I'm learning the ropes.
I'd like to know how you get just a light smattering of stars in your image. When I shoot the Orion, Running Man, Horse Head, Flame in one frame, the sky is massively overloaded with thousands of stars. How do you remove most of them? A video showing how to do that would be great. I currently use SIRL and GIMP.
I have several processing videos on my channel and most of them cover star reduction and removal. Sadly I'm using Photoshop. I did see a star reduction with GIMP video by Astro on a Budget. Might be worth checking out!
I've been using cmos-cooled camera with 3 different telescopes, but time and time again I get pulled back to my DSLR photography, just for the ease of using and taking fantastic photos quickly. Some people think who move beyond a certain level won't touch their "inferior" imaging equipment, but that's not true. I use whatever I feel like and whatever I think is gonna be fun at the time. It doesn't have to be a chore, it's not a job, the only requirement is to have fun whatever you have or whatever you wanna use.
Fun and educational video. I just purchased a Redcat 51 III and my first target is the same FOV with that 2 for 1.
Damn! That's pretty good, i need to give my 75-300mm a try i guess.
The photos look amazing 😅 i do have the Tamron 70-300mm for my Sony A6000 🙈 - after watching your videos I feel encouraged to make a first try even with a very budget-y setup
Nice vid Walt! I like how you keep it simple. It so easy to get completely lost in the deep, deep rabbit hole that Astrophotography can be. Looking forward to your next upload. Regards from Holland.
After taking a picture of the Orion Nebula, I bought a C5 spotting scope, an iexos-100 tracking mount, then a 150-600mm lens, now wanting a Celestron 9.25, larger.tracking mount... lol it's addictive...
Another great video. Thanks for reminding me about that dummy battery. I use a modified Nikon D810. I also have a Jackery 1000 small generator that I can plug the dummy battery into along with my Adventurer 2i.
Enjoy what you have is the best advice you can get! Great vid.
Going to try for the Orion Nebula this upcoming weekend with a 70-200 2.8 at a camping trip, thanks for the informative video. The alien bit killed me hahaha.
Sympathetic, concise, no complacent bullshit. Keep it up.
Thank you for this video and all the tips. Gold... Using Jupiter and its moons to focus is a smart tip that seems to get better chance of success than just trying to narrow down a star to its smallest focus size.
Another excellent video. May I suggest Gaffers tape. Electrical tape can leave a stick residue. Gaffers tape is very strong and never have I seen it leave a residue.
My move shoot move is arriving tomorrow so I'm praying for some clear nights. Thanks for your videos, they really are helping. That is a savage result too on that rig.
I'm new to astrophotography and this is an amazing video to help me get started. Very straightforward. Thank you for the sites to use and I look forward to watching your other videos.
I'm so glad you got something out of it!
Great videos, mate. I will try with my lens!
Thanks for another informative and entertaining video. You are encouraging to us newbies. Now need to save my money for a tracker.
Wait! Let's see what you can get with the lizaaaaaard!
very good man! simply and easy
Thanks so much Walt!, for your, "so simple" explanation...it really helps!
Been really digging your channel. Great content with chuckles sprinkled in.
Thanks for breaking down telescopius for us!
I could make an entire video about how awesome Telescopius is!
That alien bit was hilarious 😂
Nice result
Excellent, clear and very usefull presentation! Thanky you!
Haven't read any of the comments yet, but in case no one else has said anything, use gaffers tape to fix the focus on your lenses. No residue at all. I use a bright yellow, so that it's easier to see in the dark. ...But don't tape your lenses and think they're set all year long - Nico Carver, aka Nebula Photos, just posted a video on 11-5-21 explaining why infinity focus is variable. Temperature, among other things, can affect infinity focus. Very valuable information in that video.
I typically don't use tape at all for focus. Only focal lengths in zoom lenses. I find myself having to adjust the focus way too often!
Great video my friend. Congratulations!
Oh man, it is 12pm here and I was just about to go out and try to capture the Orion nebula with my Eos 550 and 75-300mm kit lense. This was an amazing timing, thank you!
(Btw I'm a beginner, the only thing I attempted so far is the Pleiades)
Great video. A hobby the can keep on giving as long as we "injoy what we DO have" a plain old 10in f4.7 dob for now learning the sky. Pushing the limits and understanding each new found target brings a smile. I injoy the (hunt). be kind be safe and treat others as you hope to be treated.
I tried last month to photograph the Orion Nebula with a DSLR full frame camera and a 70 - 300 lens. The histogram was too far to the left and any longer exposure would have resulted in star trails, so I will have to wait till I save up enough to buy a star tracker. I will continue to use what I have available in my learning process, until it is time to move on to better gear. At 55 deg North, milkyway shots are not going to include the core, so it has to be DS astro for me
Thank you for this video, and turning me on to Telescopious!!!!!!
I really do enjoy your vids, 👍
Thanks!
Not NASA quality? That was a stunning photo. I appreciate photos like that because it captures the sheer size of the nebulae framed with the stars which can be identified in the constellation.
Beautiful Walt. Love these videos and your work. So proud of you and love the passion you have for this.
Great shot . Have you modified this camera ?
Thank you so much for your help.
Bought a star adventurer 2i.
Put on my 24-85 kit lens with the D750.
Presto.
Orion nebula.
Christmas greetings from South Africa
I liked your video, Walt. It's inspired me to do more wide-field astrophotography. There's a lot of beauty out there! I'd also like to know your image processing method as your end result was definitely worth accepting the limitations of your gear. Paul.
OK, I've found your processing video at ruclips.net/video/xekfvi-i1Hk/видео.html. I'll look at this now and comment separately.
Dude, you do some amazing work with simple kit lenses. Loving the content. 🙏🏻🙌🏻
Thank you!
dude i just gotta say real quick you are probably my favorite astro content creator. your images are just insane and its so nice to see someone not use a 2000 euro mount with a bomb ass telescope on. i got the same lense quite cheap off of ebay just because of you to be honest haha. love you man
Hi,
Nice video and I like that your not using guiding. Ive invested in an omegon clockwork system for its portability to try to find somewhere dark. I think in principle its intended for milkyway shooting but I think I can get ok tracking for 60s with a dslr and a 70-250mm lens so will try and use it at 150-200mm. I know your using a 75-300 lens, but is the camera modified? Regards Chris
LMAO " I was just trying to photograph Uranus" Great stuff.
Love your channel! Keep up the good work!
Great content!
Wow you did a great job....
Thanks for this vid. I am a newbie in this hobby and I learned a lot from you. Thank you.
Another fantastic, educational, and entertaining video Walt! thank you! I like what you say- photographing is only half the fun. Processing is really what makes or break the photo IMO and you do such a great job in post on all your images.
Nice final image , like the astrophotography hate the tech side of the processing
Good content, nicely presented and sprinkled with humor (I knew the lizard will show up sooner or later, lol). Clear skies.
Super video! Explained everything perfectly to a complete noob such as me.
You scared the BGSUS out of me with that mask, I was not expecting that. 😂
Question, if I don’t have a startracker, but an old Canon 400D & a 75-300 f4.5-5.6 lens, could I do 50x 2 sec exposure, re-align, 50x 2 sec exposure, etc. For about 2hrs, or so. Then stack, process, etc. Would I be able to get something similar?
Yeah for sure. You might need to use a higher ISO, but you should be able to get some good stuff.
@@deltaastrophotography Thanks for the reply & advice, I was thinking about something like iso 1600 with the highest aperature,
@@MaartenAnna Did you get some astro imaging with that lens? If so, how did it go? I would imagine with an f4.5-5.6 lens and 2 second exposures, you would likely need to use at least 6400iso.
Great Video and amazing Image .. as always 👌
Thanks!!
Awesome video. Thanks.
Thanks for such good videos, they're the reason why I'll start next week my astro adventure with my MFT equipment!!!
The king has made another video!
You can also do this preview in Stellarium, only disadvantage is that you have to downoland it
I also use Sky Safari Pro on my phone to do the preview as well!
Another great video....thank you so much! Your videos always manage to make me get up off my ass and get outside at night!
Brilliant video, it's just that lens, I can't get it in focus, will keep trying, love your work, keep it up, from a cloudy bottle 5 England. 😁
I have the Sony A6000 and was hoping I may be able to get into some deeper space objects than the conventional milky way shots. Any ideas for relatively cheap lens that perform alright?
Man... Your location seems like an astrophotographer dream to setup anything. (Living in Bortle 8/9 Los Angeles area...)
I was thinking about moving to Chicago right before I started this hobby. I'm really glad I didn't!
Thanks Walt! Great content as always
That's a great image especially seeing as it's with an unmodded camera! How do you manage to bring out the Ha in the Horsehead Nebula so well?
My Bottle 3 sky I guess. I'm able to pick up more Ha since I don't have to shoot through much light pollution!
@@deltaastrophotography That's good to hear. I live in a Bortle 4/5 area. Even with 2-3 hours worth of integration time (which isn't a lot admittedly) my Ha is minimal and comes out noisy if I over process it. Guess I've just got to put more hours in and add a lot more data. I use an unmodded Canon EOS R6. Seeing images like yours inspires people to what can be achieved with minimal equipment.
@@mikecole1337 My next video will be how I processed this image. I'll leave a link to my unprocessed stacked TIFF, so you can see when my data really looks like!
@@deltaastrophotography Looking forward to seeing and comparing it 👍
Thank you, so useful, I would like to do this, I have the kit already but so far have just taken wide sky images. How do you find the exact place to point the camera
ive only just recenlty came across ur channel as ive just started to get in to astrophotography! best channel ive found, love how u go in to great detail and explain everything so even a complete noob can understand, u make astrophotography less scary as for a lot of people they wouldnt know where to start, watching ur videos i feel confident and when the rest of my equipment arrives ill be prepared and ready to start shooting the sky! thanks!
Hi, I use instead of tape, 3d printed c-shaped clips. they snap on the tubus of the lens and stop slipping. i have different sizes for different focal lengths (e.g. 100, 135. 200, 300). or you kan use a pvc pipe and cut to the length.
Any chance you can post the STL's somewhere? I'd love to give them a try.
@@sanderreizevoort4143 hi, mine are for a Fuji 70-300 so you have to adjust diameter and lenght according to your lens. I can send them later when i'm back from work. If you still want.
@@archaeofo That'd be great!
@@sanderreizevoort4143 my wetransfer-link geht's deleted. Can u give me a Mail Adresse?
Easy to follow thx.
I was on electronic shutter last weekend and the only way I could get the camera to take multiple photos and it stopped after 1 shot. On mechanical shutter it works as you show. Have I screwed up a setting again?
The alien 👽 scene lmao
What was the camera body?
How were you able to get such a detailed image straight on the camera?
Longer exposures with the star tracker and lower ISOs show a lot more color and detail!
@@deltaastrophotography Ah thank you, star tracker is a bit out of my reach at the moment so i'll stick to more exposures till i can get one
@@jonycreed Yeah it took me three years before I could get my first star tracker. Now I try to do one nice upgrade per year
This is good!!! 🤗
Excellent Walt! I have a canon 75-300 mm and had some success at the same target, but I suffered a little with focus slipping (no tape) so once you have focus how do you tape the focus to hold without moving the lens out of focus? Thanks! Simon
I usually only tape the focal length down. I've never really tried taping the focus. I did get a bahtinov mask for this lens though. It only cost me $13 and I can get great focus at first. Just gotta check for slips from time to time.
@@deltaastrophotography Thank you. The end the lens I think moves too much on my lens and finding that sweet spot is difficult :-)
@@astrodad-simonb277 yeah and I'm never able to take flats with that lens. I don't want to touch the end of it with a tablet because I'm afraid I might knock the focus out.
I find that old manual film lenses generally have a rather dampened focus ring that provides a bit of resistance. These would be unlikely to slip. I notice the focus rings on a lot of modern AF lenses tend to be 'looser' (for lack of a better term.) Some time back, I shot some light and dark frames of the Large Magellanic Cloud with an old 135mm f2.5 film lens. I haven't stacked them as yet as I'm new to this kind of photography.
Are you on Twitter that I could follow ? Thanks!
Will the remote intervelometer not work correctly when my R6 is electronic shutter only?
Made. My. Day
Oh also, what tripod would you recommend for the star tracker? I have a tripod with a ball head, but it isn't compatible for the star tracker. Also, if a tripod is good for the SkyWatcher Star Adventurer, is it also good for the iOptron star tracker?
It should be. The iOptron tripod is actually in stock right now and it is good for both!
@@deltaastrophotography thank you!! Yeah it is hard to find the SkyWatcher Star Adventurer in stock, and when it is in stock they are asking $550 for it. A year ago, I could find it easy for $400. So, I have the 18-55, nifty fifty, 75-300, and 70-250. Would I need the counterweight kit to use those lenses, specifically the 250 and 300 ones, or can I attach the camera to the star tracker without the counterweight?
LMAO, you were waaaaay too happy with the duct tape...women in your area should be very afraid! Lol, so quick question. Does Telescopium account for the crop size of your focal length when using the canon APSC or whatever it is? So when I put in my focal length, do I need to account for the 1.6 crop or can I just put in the focal length and the software will correct for the 1.6? I hope I am making sense. What I am asking makes sense in my head, lol.
You have to specify your sensor size in Telesopious. I create a profile and input each of my cameras and their sensor sizes. That way when I preview a focal length, I can choose which camera I'm shooting with and it will be accurate.
I too am an amateur astrophotographer, using nikon d3400 along with a 70-300mm lens .
I don't have a tracker unfortunately. Any guidance for me to shoot orion ??
It's my dream to one day get a star tracker
You could do stacking with lots of short exposures on a static tripod. Though I would imagine that a 70 - 300mm would have a very small maximum aperture - probably around f4 - 5.6. So you would have to push the iso up insanely high - probably well over 6400 iso.
@@anzaeria I just got the tracker last month so I'm sorted now. Thanks alot for your advice
is that a stock camera or modified?
Why not go to 300mm? I have the same kit lens, but on the Nikon side.
I've taken some pretty good images with it, for me (a total beginner). Stacking is fine with DSS but I can not process for shit!
I have a Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Pro mount but only can go about 90-105 seconds before I get trailing.
Another kool video. And I really appreciate your sense of humor. We need more Gigan sightings! 🤣🤣
Ooo a Godzilla fan! Woo hoo! For me personally, things get a little fuzzy after 200mm with that lens. But if it works for you then go for it! And yeah I can't really get much longer than that without auto-guiding. At least not when I'm shooting around 200mm or more
i would like to get aa intervalometer but my camera only says it uses the wirteless one from nikon is that just what they recommend or will nothing else work anybody know?
Very nice. Do you use an astro modified DSLR for your shots, or is it stock?
The camera in this video is stock. I have a modified T5i, but I've only used it in one video and people complained lol! I'm shooting with my modified camera tonight though!
@@deltaastrophotography thanks for that. I've only just started getting into astrophotography and have an unmodified T8i that I use on a star adventurer or with an evostar 72 ED telescope. And my few shots that I've started to take don't have a lot of range of colours in them. And I was wondering if that was because my camera was unmodified. It's probably also due to my novice editing skills.
@@Bigprior What's the light pollution like where you shoot?
Bortle 4/5 from my backyard but 20 mins in the car and I can get to Bortle 2 skies. I just haven't ventured away from home while I'm learning the ropes.
Your videos are amazing. Just be careful with those pesky grey dudes that keep popping up
Beware FedEx 😅
Siril, Siril is free on.a Mac.
9:29 I don't know why, but as you are setting up here, the background almost looks fake, like you are using a green screen, lol.
I'd like to know how you get just a light smattering of stars in your image. When I shoot the Orion, Running Man, Horse Head, Flame in one frame, the sky is massively overloaded with thousands of stars. How do you remove most of them? A video showing how to do that would be great. I currently use SIRL and GIMP.
I have several processing videos on my channel and most of them cover star reduction and removal. Sadly I'm using Photoshop. I did see a star reduction with GIMP video by Astro on a Budget. Might be worth checking out!
Painters tape 🙃