2019-2022 Ranger: Whipple 2.3L EcoBoost Stage 1 Kit | Install, Dyno, 0-60 MPH

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 апр 2022
  • The Ranger is a good truck in its own rite, and now with EcoBoost performance, they are easily tunable and can make much more power than ever before! We installed Whipple’s Stage 1 Kit on this 2.3L Ranger and tested its performance before and after to show you how much power you really can get out of your Ford Ranger! Stay tuned for a product review, installation, and before/after dyno pull and 0-60 MPH runs!
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Steeda_YT
    Shop Ford performance parts at www.Steeda.com!
    Purchase these parts directly from Steeda:
    www.steeda.com/whipple-eb-816...
    MPN: EB-8162
    Part: 439 EB-8162
    ---
    Steeda Website:
    www.steeda.com
    Steeda Performance Vehicles
    www.steedavehicles.com
    Steeda Europe:
    www.steeda.co.uk
    Steeda Pinterest:
    / pins
    Steeda Facebook:
    / steedaautosports
    Steeda Instagram:
    / steedaautosports
    Steeda Twitter:
    / steedaautosport
    Steeda Blog:
    www.steedablog.com/
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 76

  • @steedaautosports
    @steedaautosports  2 года назад +3

    Be sure to check out this awesome modification for your Ford Ranger at Steeda.com!
    www.steeda.com/whipple-eb-8162-ranger-stage-1-kit

  • @bldmovs
    @bldmovs 2 года назад +80

    $1900 for a tenth of a second? Ouch.

    • @GatorNRP
      @GatorNRP Год назад +2

      Fr😭

    • @Chef-James
      @Chef-James 8 месяцев назад +2

      Plus the lifetime added cost of premium gas.

  • @Rob...
    @Rob... 2 года назад +24

    so weird to hear and see the whipple name without the actual supercharger!

  • @mabelpup8502
    @mabelpup8502 Год назад +25

    Ford can tune the 2.3 to 310 hp for $800..

  • @JesseAndMike
    @JesseAndMike 2 года назад +6

    Great review and install video like always!

  • @brianchoate7917
    @brianchoate7917 2 года назад +41

    Pretty underwhelmed by the results. Bang for buck, there’s tunes available that do considerably better on the dyno and on the street without an antiquated K&N filter and pointless FMIC replacement. Back to the drawing board, Steeda

    • @Trumplican
      @Trumplican Год назад +4

      antiquated? oiled reusable filters are still the best way to go for high air flow and longevity just because K&N filters have been around a long time doesn't mean they are outdated. In fact it means they are proven time and time again especially if you take care of them like you should.

    • @brianchoate7917
      @brianchoate7917 Год назад +5

      Dino oil has been around for longer than K&N filters. Leaf springs have been around longer than K&N filters. Does that mean they are the best? A K&N uses outdated technology and while it does flow more air, it does so by also flowing more contaminants in that air. There are many aftermarket options that use synthetic media and flow more air while filtering to a smaller micron count when compared to stock paper and yes, antiquated cotton gauze and oil media.

    • @Trumplican
      @Trumplican Год назад +2

      @@brianchoate7917 that's about the dumbest comparison I've ever heard. I didn't say they were good because they were old, I said they are still good even though they are old. They do not let more contaminants in thats what a prefilter cover and the oil is for. They are excellent filters for atv's/dirt bikes in high dust/dirt environments but talking cars/trucks most people don't even get into that type of environment so even if they weren't good for that, which they are, the point is usually moot. You keep your restrictive synthetic filter if it somehow makes you feel safer just because it's "newer"

    • @brianchoate7917
      @brianchoate7917 Год назад +1

      Hahaha. You couldn’t be more misinformed if you tried. yOu NEeD a PRefIlTEr foR YoUr filtER. Give me a break. Try doing just the slightest bit of research and you’ll learn something. Or keep your head buried in the sand and keep praising a company that puts zero R&D into any of their products beyond “it fits”. Enjoy that K&N marketing kool aid.

    • @Trumplican
      @Trumplican Год назад

      @@brianchoate7917 zero r&d LOL since youre gonna say ive done no research i gotta tell you i've been a powersports mechanic for almost 2 decades building race engines and trying all kinds of different brands of just about every performance part out there using not the seat of my pants but expensive tools including a superflow dyno which i kinda doubt you have access to so im thinking you dont know shite. I never said you need a prefilter but if youre gonna be in high dust/debris areas or in snow its good to have one. just because you think your favorite air filter is the best doesnt mean it is. you sound like one of those guys that had an old abused K&N filter and were too dumb to realize it was bad and now thinks all of them are like that. pretty pathetic bud.

  • @t-roysnfs117
    @t-roysnfs117 Год назад +5

    2020 Ranger XLT 4x4 - 5 Star daily 91 tune,aFe intake, aFe down pipes 0-60 5.7 sec @5000ft. Cost me about $1,200 for everything. I also have a 93 performance tune, but I haven’t run it in the truck yet. Thinking, maybe 5.5 0-60 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @ddroz23
    @ddroz23 5 месяцев назад +2

    You forgot to change the trash hot side pipe for the Ranger. It needs it for that Intercooler to be useful.

  • @TopGoose-bf1mx
    @TopGoose-bf1mx 2 года назад +17

    $2k for 1/10th faster 0-60? Lol.

    • @brianchoate7917
      @brianchoate7917 2 года назад +6

      Exactly. Way overpriced and underperforming kit

  • @NemesisDigitalMedia
    @NemesisDigitalMedia Год назад +2

    Bogged the hell out of that second launch lol Should have done it again instead of making one pass. Seems like someone wanted to head to lunch early hah

  • @NoizTheDj
    @NoizTheDj 2 года назад +21

    Or you can just buy the Ford tune and get the same hp but cheaper.

    • @totallynotawerewolf2936
      @totallynotawerewolf2936 2 года назад +9

      And full warranty

    • @Travisj9935
      @Travisj9935 2 года назад +4

      Why bother, just get a real tune like Livernois

    • @elliottloomis4383
      @elliottloomis4383 2 года назад +5

      @@Travisj9935 Livernois writes the Ford performance tune. But a custom tune will pick up far more.

    • @remembermorrison
      @remembermorrison Год назад +2

      @@elliottloomis4383 Livernois does, but their own tune provides more power, obviously without the warranty though.

  • @fireinthewhole
    @fireinthewhole 2 года назад +2

    Should have done a timed acceleration run at higher speeds to see the real world power benefits. I bet there would have been a more noticeable improvement from say 30-80mph

  • @garyjarvis2730
    @garyjarvis2730 Год назад

    Run a stock ranger on 93 octane and you will see an increase in both HP and torque. The intercooler is an expensive upgrade when all of the heavy lifting is done by the software upgrade. Is the new intercooler a nice product? - yes. Is it really needed?, no. Thanks for sharing.

  • @furiangameclips
    @furiangameclips 2 месяца назад +2

    A tenth? I wouldn't have posted this video...

  • @garypollack6948
    @garypollack6948 2 года назад +2

    Would love to see this for a 2020 + 2.3 Explorer.

    • @Trumplican
      @Trumplican Год назад +1

      i didnt know they still made the exploder

  • @MrBigBoy4Life
    @MrBigBoy4Life Год назад +2

    Does this mean that you're gonna have to now use the expensive gas?

    • @steedaautosports
      @steedaautosports  Год назад

      For this calibration, yes. Whipple recommends 91+ octane. -Chris

  • @bricks-mortar
    @bricks-mortar 6 месяцев назад

    TY. But, I trust Ford Motors engineers and scientists. Won't be messing up the Ford product.

  • @remembermorrison
    @remembermorrison Год назад +4

    Underwhelming.
    1st, stock intercooler is pretty beefy, the best improvement is to change the intercooler pipes. It's a shame the Whipple kit doesn't include intercooler pipes.
    2nd, just go with the Ford Performance tune over this Whipple tune.
    Or if you actually want to make power, go with Livernois Motorsports, who make the Ford Performance tune, or Tory at Unleashed.

  • @Turbo4Joe363
    @Turbo4Joe363 2 года назад +3

    That $$$ intercooler won't really shine unless you do back-to-back dyno runs, simulating heat soak.
    (Or run for an extended time under boost.)
    For that kind of money, I'll be installing a Methanol injection system.
    Much cheaper than that expensive intercooler, REALLY lowers IATs, lowers EGTs, plus it cleans the intake valves on a DI engine.

  • @TexasStormChaser
    @TexasStormChaser 2 месяца назад

    So you confirmed that your tune and parts are slower than just a bone stock truck with FPP warranty tune. Thanks.

  • @krishardin9591
    @krishardin9591 2 года назад +5

    There are plenty of other tuners that will get you in the range of 300 to 320 HP with nothing else but the tune. Come on Whipple....do better.

    • @steedaautosports
      @steedaautosports  2 года назад

      Perhaps, but CARB Approved and 50-State Legal isn't easy while gaining this much power. Hope this helps! -Chris

    • @7381366
      @7381366 Год назад +4

      @@steedaautosports ford performance does 45hp carb legal and no mods

    • @remembermorrison
      @remembermorrison Год назад +2

      @@steedaautosports Ford Performance tune... Keeps the factory warranty, gains 45 hp and 60 ft lbs, plus is 50 state legal.

  • @Pnw208
    @Pnw208 11 месяцев назад

    Why doesn't the tube delete the limiter?

  • @matthewbuckner4000
    @matthewbuckner4000 5 месяцев назад

    I saw a 93 tune added 50hp and 50 trQ

  • @mcciaccio
    @mcciaccio 2 года назад +2

    Can they just put the damn 2.7 in the Ranger… I have been waiting to buy one hoping they put a 2.7 in the ranger.

  • @matthew197735
    @matthew197735 Год назад

    i have a 2020 ranger XLT with FX4 that speed limiter stops it at 110mph and my thing is if i tune my truck will it also change my over all top speed also cause tuning for better and higher performance but keeping top speed the same is pointless to me

    • @homerj2017
      @homerj2017 Год назад +1

      Don’t forget your tires are rated for 112 mph max

  • @Icee_White
    @Icee_White 3 месяца назад

    It hurt like hell saying a tenth of a second faster didn’t it?😂

  • @spikestang6345
    @spikestang6345 2 года назад +8

    Seems kinda lazy compared to the livernois tune

  • @elliottloomis4383
    @elliottloomis4383 2 года назад +5

    Unleashed tune only in my 21 lariat fx4 supercrew is faster......

  • @jasonmckay4435
    @jasonmckay4435 7 месяцев назад

    Can that same kind of kit be installed on the 2.3l mustangs?

    • @steedaautosports
      @steedaautosports  7 месяцев назад +1

      Whipple has a kit that's designed for the Mustangs you can find here -> www.steeda.com/whipple-eb-8000-mustang-ecoboost-stage-1-kit

  • @garyring8306
    @garyring8306 Год назад +1

    torque is way more important than HP especially in 1/4 mile runs. more torque you will need a factor more in HP to beat me at the end of the track. the price tag for all of this is way out of line for the performance gain. lastly its a truck and again torque talks and hp is along for the ride.

  • @Trumplican
    @Trumplican Год назад +1

    why didnt you show the torque numbers? ah just watched the end. seeing horsepower is just a reflection of torque im not sure why you cant get torque numbers but im sure you know what you are talking about.

    • @steedaautosports
      @steedaautosports  Год назад +1

      We had issues getting a solid RPM signal off of the coil pack of this Ranger. Because we couldn't get an RPM signal, we couldn't measure torque. Hope this helps! -Chris

    • @Trumplican
      @Trumplican Год назад

      @@steedaautosports oh yeah that makes sense i missed where you said that!

  • @Pnw208
    @Pnw208 11 месяцев назад

    Why wouldn't they put the 2.7 or even the 3.0 in this truck? The 3.0 would have been amazing. Gas mileage would be so much better too. The weight difference isn't much compared to the power

  • @moorejl57
    @moorejl57 Год назад +1

    Lol, my untuned 2021 Lariat is already fast enough, can think of better ways to spend the money.

  • @phileasler5401
    @phileasler5401 Год назад

    Seems like a weird mod for a small 2.3 L 4cyc?

  • @user-qw8og2sq2f
    @user-qw8og2sq2f 8 месяцев назад

    No make sense for me . All that job a don't see huge difference. I did intake , bov and exhaust with factory tune and gain 44 hp at the tire

  • @cbruno12180
    @cbruno12180 Год назад +3

    Waste of money!! The ford procal is 600 bucks will gain a full second 0/60 why would you do this for 1 tenth lol 😂

  • @EL_FEDERAL_252
    @EL_FEDERAL_252 Год назад +1

    🤔🤔🤔
    $1,900?!?!

  • @someguy4476
    @someguy4476 6 месяцев назад

    Weird it only gained 50 HP with all of that when just tuners are claiming to get that with JUST a tune. 👎🏼👎🏼
    Someone should do an electric fan kit for these to really wake the truck up.

  • @mikefuentes2657
    @mikefuentes2657 Год назад

    California won’t allow it as of today

  • @yzth3ory630
    @yzth3ory630 2 года назад +3

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 STOP IT!!

  • @roywood9683
    @roywood9683 Год назад +1

    too costly for the actual driving gain.

  • @dreamcaster1969
    @dreamcaster1969 Год назад +1

    Ford tune is cheaper and faster

  • @FalconsATL
    @FalconsATL Год назад +2

    Yea.. no thanks!

  • @speed47777
    @speed47777 Год назад +1

    I think ford sells a tune for 800 that gives better gains.

  • @danadams2802
    @danadams2802 Год назад +1

    Haha

  • @Beastmode_Mr2
    @Beastmode_Mr2 2 года назад +5

    Eww.

  • @jwilh15
    @jwilh15 2 года назад +5

    Yeah this is stupid lol

  • @blakehicks7210
    @blakehicks7210 2 года назад +2

    Just a tune can get 0-60 of 5.4 to 5.7 lol this is a joke and waste of money.

  • @Chef-James
    @Chef-James 8 месяцев назад

    So sick of fail videos.

  • @gionieves2646
    @gionieves2646 Год назад +1

    What a joke...