It’s insane that instead of using ai to do the menial tasks or for business or something, like most movies predicted, we instead used it to take over art, the one thing we have as humans
I think it is the way you do it. Neuro-sama, the AI made by Vedal987 has some of the most entertaining and off the wall interactions I have ever seen and Vedal puts a lot of work in keeping it entertaining. Defiitely isn't soulles like Kwebbelkop may be.
Yeah, maybe it because they are cleary showing that its Ai and not hiding the truth. And some people really want to watch Ai content for being an Ai content
And you can tell immediately that its AI, not saying it isn't entertaining but if more neuro samas start popping up they are gonna get old reaaally fast.
@@beta2029 Don't think its gonna be hidden as much as we won't be able to tell in the future. the concearn for me isn't if its soulless or not, mor if the information is accurate or not and the flood of videos just oversaturate the market..
What about Neuro-sama? Her brand is that she is AI and she can be jank, not trying to replace a person. And the creator Vedal is such a nice guy. She is geneuinely fun to watch, and she collabs with a lot of other streamers. There's exceptions.
The difference is likely in the execution... Vedal is active in the process and is having fun together with the chat. Where as kwebbelkop wants to be replaced and get all the work done with AI, and get easy money... Im not saying Vedal is perfect but you can feel the soul and hard work that vedal have put in to neuro.
AI is inevitable. And it will inevitably do everything we do but better. That includes making media. There will come a day when people look back on Shakespeare and Tolkien as amateurs compared to the works of our singularity inspired AI.
Laziness aside, my concern with this is when it comes to liability in court. Accountability is really important especially when we’re playing with fire.
@@Dr.BDoverallegations, or something could easily make it to court. And then how can you argue that someone didn't say something if a perfect replication of their voice clearly said it
@@indoorkite651 filter it so it can't say dumb shit and then if it still says dumb shit edit it out of the video it's not rocket science there wont be allegations if he's not stupid
Oh you know, the si has already made a guy commit suicide, there are people not trying to cause mental anguish to others, but they do, and you can say it's their problem, but doesn't change the fact that they are partly at fault... And with parents not monitoring their kids, they can be raised by racists, money loving douchebags, conspiracy theorists, scammers, abusers, just rude people in general who doesn't think of how they might influence kids to go into people's unlocked homes etc, child molesters or other hainous opinions like incels, violence etc.... The ai are mimicking us and even with guidelines, nothing ever can prevent a bug or negligence or whatever errors that has already happened with technology or people controlling technology... There will also be people taking advantage of it for nefarious reasons, hacking using obvious passwords, scamming old or otherwise vulnerable people etc etc etc... If you cannot see the REAL and actually dangerous possibilities, you have a screwed imagination that can only see insane or dumb possibilities or you're just too young to understand
Charlie: It's deception, it will never be good content and no one who knows it's AI will enjoy it Neuro sama enjoyers: God damn I love this soulless machine.
Neuro sama has a set personality programmed into her. Plus there is an actual person behind her. The fun in neuro sama is seeing how this AI interacts with chat and it’s creator, something I doubt AI “influencers” will all have. Plus her charm is how unhinged she is due to being an AI and the random tangents she goes on.
As someone who is trying really hard to get published as an author. It really is insulting to see how publishers try to undercut the writers by just having AI write stuff for them, then have the editors pour hundreds of hours editing that crap. Tough times are ahead us for us creatives and it will only get tougher from here. Sadly.
kinda the same here. I'm not even at that stage yet. I want to become an author and an illustrator, but with how things are going and how sh*tty companies are, I might have to reconsider. I'll prob still take courses related to that in college tho
Same. I can see some good things that AI can be used for, like in the fields of science, or something like that. Maybe AI can be a boost to help broaden our understanding of the universe? But i could also see its usefulness in regards of helping people with things like writing an application, understanding something complex, you name it. I could also see the usage in regards to social situations for those people who are lonely, or have social anxiety or something like that. (Not saying they HAVE to use it, just that they CAN use it if they want to.) But i am frankly scared of how it will be utilized, still. We could have AI replace shitty jobs no one wants, in exchange for more people getting creative. It shouldn't be the other way around, where we replace creative fields with AI, and confine us to shitty jobs that no one wants.
@@yheti3584Superman 64 is one of the worst, least fun games on the planet, so using it to represent video games as a whole and their fun value is stupid, just like using kwebbelkop to represent AI and it’s implications
@@valkyrchesaIt really depends on how it’s used, the majority will indeed use it for lazily gaining attention and money. Neuro sama has the work done behind her and love put into making her work and have personality.
It's crazy to me that we get to live in the timeline where AI makes art and does entertaining jobs like being a RUclipsr or a online personality while people are stuck doing manual labour. We were promised a future where the machines take over manual labour and would free up time for the average person to pursue arts, writing, and creative passions, instead, the machine is doing that while we are left to do the tedious, boring work. This is not the future I signed up for.
Data is a lot easier for a computer to handle than reality. Btw most people prefer manual labour to making art. Artists are a minority and many people take great pride in and find fulfillment in labour
The main thing that concerns me is that when we get to the point where we can’t tell if something is ai generated, the ai could turn into anyone and say whatever they want, we could end up having markiplier ai saying nazi propaganda or a famous actor calling someone else racial slurs. We’ve already seen what happens when fake accounts get a hold of famous names, like when verification became paid, companies were dropping in stock price cause people didn’t realise that people were making fake accounts
it's funny that u say that, bc the problem is that this technology already exists, at least, in the academic world princeton, stanford, and adobe released a paper in 2019 where they were able to take video and audio of a subject, create a machine learning model that captured facial features and audio cues, and then utilize the model to generate a new video that perfectly portrays a subject saying anything they want this technology has been in development for YEARS now in the academic world, so i imagine it will only take a few years before industry and independent developers catch up and use this technology for their own purposes
it's going to be hard for future content creators to make any money off of RUclips since it's all about data algorithms which ai will know how to create the perfect video to get the best mass market appeal but the problem with this is if everyone uses ai to create perfect videos than RUclips is going to be flooded with this ai content thus bringing the value down and no one getting payed.
We can use the same technology that is mimic us to also certify us, at a nano scale im sure there are micro fluctuations in our speech and breathing that only tech could spot. Almost like specific genetic sounds and expressions we make and could never be replicated. Idk I just pulled that outa my butt tho
Or it could be a famous person actually saying shady things then claiming it as AI. I can record a 4K Dolby Atmos video of the president and any politicians of being racist or snorting cocaine or doing a shady corrupt dealings, it won't matter. They and their PR team can just say it's AI, paid some PR agency that paid some analyst to make some news article/tiktok/youtube analyzing why the video could be AI generated. Yes, they can do all of those things even before 2022 without AI, but current AI capabilities just make it way easier since people believe AI can make everything.
What’s fascinating to me is how utterly disconnected this guy is from people’s concerns about AI. He asks “why does everyone hate AI?” and people respond with the obvious answers. that it’s soulless, it’s deceptive, it takes what’s supposed to be a creative platform and turns it into factory work, it requires no effort on the influencer’s part. And his response to that is “But why do you hate that?” He cares so little about his channel as an actual form of expression and passion, he is so unbothered by the prospect of his career turning into grifting children while he does nothing of value, that any suggestion that these are bad things is incomprehensible to him. Much like the AI he developed from himself, the algorithm and numbers is all he’s capable of thinking about now.
It's kind of funny how science fiction always thought that AI would take over the layman's job first, but it would never be able to take away the job of the creative, but here we are and AI is coming for the creatives first.
I think it's just that most of the layman's jobs in the developed world basically just exist to provide jobs. All the jobs essential to society's function are either mostly automated or outsourced to a poorer country where labor is so cheap it's not worth automating.
This is actually depressing, it'll either be like we cannot distinguish between real people and AI or everything is going to be so lifeless like it is right now..
@@MATAX5 This world is pretty fucked man, they're just trying to stay alive and not be homeless I guess. They have to do it, being off of the street is enough motivation to be mindlessly working no?
Because neural networks essentially dream things up. Its more useful for entertainment than for actual work in non-virtual world. But we eventually will get there(already so much automation on factories, etc)
This genuinely made me tear up knowing one of my childhood comforts, youtube, is slowly turning into a mosh pit of AI generated content losing all soul and meaning behind it. The added element of human touch will always be EXTREMELY important.
It never had a soul. Most big RUclipsrs and twitch streamers have always been the fleshly versions of AI generated, just copying trends, faking reactions.
Were you under a rock the last 12, 13 years? Literally everyone has been saying this, ever since youtube removed the stars rating system. And do you really think the vaguely-glowing sludge churned out on shorts and on the explore page is that utopian? Shit, dead internet theory has been around for years before AI got as advanced as it is now.
This almost makes me wonder if we'll see a return to physical art to ensure human only art spaces, and it's insane that I can now unironically say "human only art spaces"
Why count out digital art out of it? Digital artists can too use the label "hand-crafted" or "hand-made" and it would be as true as in case of traditional art. IMO people may get bored of AI art very quick - at this point what makes it exciting is novelty, and that novelty is already wearing off.
There are many AI "artist" who printed off AI art on canvas and put some paint on it pretending they painted the painting. It's embarassing. Currently machines can't "paint" as there are only so many colours that can be printed and building something that can make brush strokes/mix paint/judge viscosity and colour match according to light ain't there. Yet.
@@johnalkaseltzer It makes no sense to put robots and humans in the same space. Obviously they're better. They have no limitations. But they're not people, and cannot be people. They're just things like my table or a rock. They should serve humans, not replace them.
@@seekittycatI saw a video a month or 2 ago of a robot arm painting. The paints had to be mixed for the colors by people but once it has the colors it could make physical painting the same way image AI can make digital art.
I never saw Charlie as being insane for his prediction. It's fucked up when it's a youtuber replacing himself with AI, but what happens when a brand catches onto that idea? With the writer's strike going on, how many companies are going to switch to this format to save themselves the time, effort and money of writers and artists?
Unironically AI might write better shows than some of the ones we have been getting. Not that I'm advocating for anything, I just think it's interesting how fucking bad some shows are
Oh lord they would lose more money than they would've just paying the writers and actors better, cause we aren't gonna watch their nonsensical garbage. 😂
@mimikyutubesaltaccount4875 I don't think you get what I'm saying. Our shows are already dogshit. Recycled garbage to fuel the digital content machine. Would AI trash all over the halo, witcher, and resident evil franchise? Maybe not.
I havent watched Kwebbelkop, Slogo, or Jelly in years, but all of a sudden I'm seeing them everywhere with Kweb's AI and Slogo and Jelly's new podcast, its crazy seeing youtubers I used to watch years ago coming back in completely different ways
how do we know you're not ai? how do you know i'm not ai? the problem is that ai is just becoming far too intelligent and developed, and the fact they can do everything a human can do AND MORE is just terrifying.
I'm a graphic designer and it honestly made my life easier. Photoshop is much more useful now that it has AI integration. Some tasks that took me an hour now take 15 minutes. It also helps me with idea, like sometimes I'd ask ChatGPT for specific marketing ideas and it would usually give me a good list of ideas.
Not really the actors strike is for taking a likeness and reusing it like say stan Lee being CGI'd into every new marvel movie, (which on one hand would be cool if given permission). If ai is just straight making stuff on it's own that's wholly original its fine.
um, no that isn’t what isn’t what the writer’s strike is about at all 😂 it’s about smaller and background actors getting paid the same amount as big name actors and getting breaks. that’s literally all it is about. what they don’t realize is that, if they continue to strike about this, production companies aren’t going to keep listening and bending to their will. people are getting pissed about this strike because they literally are told in their contract that they do not get breaks and such, yet these actors refuse to read the entire contract. desperation or not, read the fucking contract. people are getting pissed because these small actors are going to this strike and delaying movies. if they keep this up and continue to complain about the same things that have been complained about since the first movie was made, no one is going to care. it is’t about artificial intelligence at all. that literally isn’t even about the strike. it’s about small and background actors not getting paid the same amount as bigger actors and actresses (knowing they won’t get paid that amount because they aren’t popular enough). frankly, i think it’s stupid. you get the contract, yet you don’t read all of it. that’s the first thing any normal person would do. they’re just delaying movies and making life more miserable for the producers and directors who already have themselves hung for taking so long on movies in the first place. it’s stupid.
@@melt_brain that is not the case at all. i know people who have been in big major streaming service shows, (HBO, Netflix) like a whole episode dedicated to them, and they do not receive residuals, getting only the minimum SAG fee. they also are definitely striking for AI.
Do you believe that in the future RUclips and other video platforms will ask creators to self report in the video metadata to what extent AI has been utilized, similar to the self reporting for advertisement and broadcast things? Maybe that together with a search filter to exclude this type of content would be a neat feature. Of course, the people doing spamming, impersonation, scamming and so on would not self report so it would not cover all cases, but maybe at least it could help with moderation to some extent. Possibly a very tiny extent.
Remember how we envisioned the future as robots doing all the shit labor jobs while leaving all the fun jobs to us? Now we have AI on the way to replace artists, musicians, writers and online creators while we all move parcels for Amazon. Yay.
COVID was a test run. Once AI becomes more advanced there will be no need for the middle and lower class. Why should the rich deal with the excess waste, conflict, pollution, etc. caused by the non-one percenters when all their usefulness can be replaced by AI.
I listened to the episode of the someordinary podcast where Kwebbelkop was a guest and he laid out his "vision" for the future of entertainment. It sounded like an absolute dystopia. Man wants to eventually own thousands - if not millions - of channels, all posting daily, fully automated. He sounds so excited about it, no sign of self-awareness at all, it's absolutely chilling.
These people need to be stopped if the future of humanity is to be a good one. The people that control, that consume, that has been the enemy of people like you and me throughout history.
There is no doubt AI is becoming a problem. Before I watched this video, I read an article about Wizards of the Cost/Hasbro telling their artistic and content creators not to use AI. Fans caught something unusual in a picture of an axe-wielding giant for their new book, which the artist had used AI to make.
There is a level of satisfaction that people get when they have finished activities that require a lot of creativity such as writing an essay, filming a film, making a RUclips video, etc. When you complete these things, you feel pride and feel like you have really earned the money and respect that you are getting. More than that, you get to watch people enjoy the work you have created and that helps you feel even more pride. Having AI do all the work takes all of that away. You aren’t creating anything. These pieces of work are not yours. It’s the AI’s work.
I agree, but none of that actually matters. It is about, has always been about, and will always be about money. Nothing else. No one gives a shit whose work they're exploiting, they only care about how much money they can make with as little effort as possible. And AI is these peoples most wettest dream. Kwebblekop is making a ridiculous amount of money doing essentially nothing, and he only stands to make more as time goes on and the amount of actual work he'll have to do will only lessen. Eventually, VERY SOON, he'll just automate his content completely and he wont have to do any work at all, and still get paid these ridiculous sums of money. That's the end goal. It's not about creativity, expressing yourself, or pride. It's an INDUSTRY, not a hobby. I hate it as much as any reasonable person, but this is the future. I don't want it to be, but it is.
it's from the maker's view ,but for most consumer they can only see the end result/product not the process ,it's hard to share the satisfaction or accomplishment if they don't have the same level of passion .And most creativity such as art or composing ,most people can't see the process ,so it's like you're traveling ,you enjoy the view ,the trip and the food you had there ,but other peope only see the end result : you wasted time moving from point A to point B and eventually came back to your house. And Ai "creators" ,there's no such " journey " for them ,so they'll only see quick money and clout ,and that's their satisfaction.
The worst part is even if people don't like AI content, the ones who see profit in it will find a way to FORCE us to like it. I don't know how they'll manipulate the masses, but I am sure they will. Whether it is under our noses or not.
I honestly disagree with a lot of the stances taken in the video. Sure, right now AI is not at the point where you can tell when the content is not a genuine person (or may just be a bad youtuber lol), but what if it gets the point where it is very reactive and genuine sounding? The main point Charlie makes is that it's shitty/deceptive "because its lying to you by making you think its a real person". But what makes you think ANYBODY online is a person if they don't have a facecam? That's called Solipsism buddy. That's nothing new to the internet. Ever seen an "IRL NPC" meme? Furthermore if the AI gets to a point of sentience (NOT SAPIENCE) then who's to say that it should be treated as inferior? That's basically the entire plot of Detroit Become Human. The same argument is used all the time for animals and pets, and yet we still farm content on those all the time. I genuinely think all of this is just kneejack reactions out of fear of change and how fast it is happening and could affect the structures of our current day-to-day reality. (Like Charlie's Job and how he got it) But at the end of the day, why is that inherently a bad thing? Just like parents creating a child in the hopes that it does better than they could, humans creating AI that can do things better than they can one day should be something to be PROUD OF. I really dont get why people only view their worth in light of other peoples esteem of them and its value relative to its financial viability. Just seems so shallow. At the end of the day, I'm not here to say that THIS SPECIFIC use of AI is right or wrong. I'm just a guy. It just seems to me that Charlie (and much of chat's) view on this as a threat to all of humanity and greedy POS behavior is shortsighted. Just like any tool it can always be abused, but the main place I could see a genuine argument for it being easily abuseable is if it could take advantage of the RUclips/Internet algorithim better than people can. But then, that would be a RUclips problem. And you know what? If it's really that bad you can just not use youtube anymore. Go on a site with a "NO AI" policy or something. THATS THE FREE MARKET BABY. Sorry for the schizo rant but like, just reading this chat has me feeling everyone here has never played devils advocate and only yesmans, which has caused me to fear for the future of humanity more than any AI could.
The fact that Charlie effortlessly tied the lights flickering in to his argument is a testament to 1. How good of a speaker he is, and 2. That AI still has a long way to go to reach a level of talent that will keep people around long-term. Even a lot of people don't have the skill of ad-libbing like that. AI can replicate some things, but it really can't replicate the things that make someone truly stand out.
I don’t know when ai will be able to do it but it isn’t anything crazy😭 granted im a comm major so i’ve been doing it for years but I feel like it wouldnt be too difficult for everyone
@@IncognitoSprax You truly don't understand what AI is then. That's a kind of response made from coping or trying to rationalize to your own held beliefs. The reason I say this is because what AI does is that it generates its OWN scripts and its OWN inputs based on an algorithmic learning pattern. The only thing a human programs it to do is store data to be used later. Everything that an AI does at that point is its own choices. Otherwise what you're referring to, is just a computer. AI will eventually pass the Turing Test, and will eventually become so similar to a human, that it won't be distinguishable from real people unless that machine tells you it is, like Detroit: Become Human or something. It's already kinda started with bots on social media. A lot of those 'trolls', are actually just AI programmed to make a bunch of accounts to persuade others on what to think and how to feel, because people now have zero ability to do their own thoughts and need to be in a bandwagon of such.
@@IncognitoSpraxright now it just recites material it has already learned but I don't think it will be long before there's major advancements in processing
With AI having taken over so many things recently like voices and art, if actual content that creators put their blood and sweat into can just get replaced by AI, that really, really hurts. it’s just so dull when I find some really cool creation and then figure out that AI did it. really hope there never comes a point where you can’t tell the difference between human and AI made creations
humans making art is still a thing, yes, ai art exists and people like to look at it but human art never died because people like the human art as well, there will always be a market for human made stuff, i mean are you just gonna stop watching penguinz0 because you can watch ai content? no, there is no need to worry because ai will never fully take anything over, at most it can be as good as the content its fed to learn off so at most it will be as good as your favorite youtuber
The scary thing is that the majority of viewers will probably be fine with and feed right into this AI takeover. There's already so many documentaries on RUclips that have robot voices which I personally find disturbing, yet no one seems to take notice or see it as an issue. Scrolling through Shorts/Tiktoks/Reels is already mindless enough as it is and sprinkling in "worse" AI videos probably won't cause people to take notice.
Why would I care if the video I’m watching is made by a human or AI? I care for the entertainment, and thus far, the AI videos still have a long time before they become entertaining.
Thought I was the only one, I don't mind voiceovers too much with certain video types, but the ones where the voice is narrating what's on screen in a convoluted way which is self-explained in the video imagery itself is creepy.
The shock of this made me drop my phone in my cereal and when your lights flickered i began to believe it was the end for my phone so thanks for clarifying man
techbros really do enjoy taking interesting concepts, turning them into manipulative and malicious machinations and refuse to understand why people are bothered by it
Nah yall just refuse to use new tools to do new things, look at Lupe Fiasco using Ai' to help him inspire his writing, personally its all of these people that want artists to suffer by doing thing old antiquated grindy difficult ways, if AI can be used to speed up the creative process use it, add your own spice ect. I don't know how many times i've heard the argument that Electronic music isn't really "music" or "art" because its not played live on an instrument ect its always just whiny glorification of the grind, you should be rejoicing you have these options now. Its the underlying economic system we have thats the stem of the issue
@@mrsboat I'm sorry but I just fundamentally don't agree. You can still do as much art as you want, nobody is taking that away from you. You're the one who wants to take away art from people that they themselves prefer(according to you), and instead force them to only enjoy human-made art. And who ever said anything about making humans work for robots? How does the existence of AI art require humans to work harder against their will?
Love how instead of AI making our lives easier in our day to day life, it's instead being used to manufacture creativity so we don't have to be distracted by entertainment and instead concentrate on being hard working slaves. What a great world we'll live in soon.
9:45 As of now, recreating the likeness of a recognized individual is illegal and also our identity is protected under copyright. I managed to get a few clone channels of me taken down, so it looks like RUclips IS making slow progress towards Anti-AI protection. However, like all solutions from big companies, it's moving slower relative to how fast the problem spreads...
It's kinda sad that youtubers across the board were impressed with various applications of AI (art, animation, writing etc), until the moment it touched their livelihood.
@@kneeofjustice9619 A lot of people aren't truly scared of the metaphorical guillotine until their neck is being forced into the chopping block. It's optimism bias plus short-sightedness combined.
AI has always been a scary concept for me. And what’s even scarier is future generations 50 years from now will think AI is completely normal and don’t have much to worry about. Sort of like how we think of the internet today.
Doubt it. It will encroach on every job and ruin people's livelihoods. If it sees another decade of use, it'll either be extremely limited or we'll be living in hell.
I wonder what his thoughts are on those who do AI presidents and make a full blown series out of it, it’s not just tier list, or whatever, it’s like they actually go on adventures in the writing is actually really good
I like obvious AI, but not deceptive AI. A clear example of a good one is Neuro-sama. She is some guys coding project, but she has a blatantly robotic voice and is aware that she is a program on someone's computer and references it on many occasions.
because clearly Vedal's objective is not to make money, just to improve and create content with Neuro in a healty way, not to mention that at this point he himself creates content without it being his objective from the beginning lol
got out of my depression because i finally found something i want to do in life, graphic design. with how advanced ai has gotten in just 2 years im fucking terrified that my job is going to be taken away from me or outsourced to softwares. To be more specific, I fear that the work from free lance with individual customers and small businesses will, but not entirely, wain. I am confident that bigger more professional companies will still hire teams of designers to perfect advertisement or brands. The use of AI will then be down to the individual designer under employment if to or not be used for what ever reason (IE shifting work load to bring forward deadlines more efficiently, creating texture, general shape etc.) While work will be much faster and easier, finding the work will not be and be more competitive It being an already over saturated market, (sorry for the profanity in my first paragraph, I just finished a barbell set in the gym and wasn't articulating my thoughts properly.)
Yeah I get you man, I will finally get my first job in graphic design after 2 years of internship just to be hit with this AI shit. Now, I'll probably have to consider changing my career, cause I'm certain that at least 80% of graphic designers, illustrators and artists will have no job after the AI really takes over. At least I'm not that passionate about it anymore (thanks burnouts and depression). Since you have passion for the field, at least try it and have a plan B just in case :) Good luck !
Well, if Kwebbelkop isn't going to lift another finger to evolve their AI then this is truly Kwebbelkop end game as it is - how long til he gets bored and the content feels soulless even to Kwebbelkop? I have many questions like that. Currently I'm wondering if AI ever gets anxiety about it's cringe moments. It would make a great plot for a redemption arc in an AI plotline to triumphantly embrace their cringe.
We're not sure of that. AI training on itself and creating inbred models is a huge issue, there are no good ways to detect AI to prevent that, and the Internet is getting absolutely flooded with AI right now. On top of that, add potential copyright laws preventing AI from being trained on the majority of the content it needs to even be functional. Notice how the latest GPT model is lobotomized compared to the previous one. Sam Altman and his cronies WANT you to think it's the worse it will ever be. Might not. Keep a healthy dose of skepticism.
I mean, this won't be the worst but yeah, it certainly won't get worse on a grand scale unless something major occurs that I couldn't possibly foresee as an average person.
"AI can never do this" The many fearful say to themselves but no one should be speaking so foolishly, any who say a phrase alike are heavily underestimating the true capacity of artificial connectomes.
@@plebmcpleb5761 No less "inbred" than accidentally using bad quality art made by humans, what is wanted will still be desired and so made. Quality will be evolutionary nevertheless.
AI has the potential to be extremely valuable in the context of science, medicine, and engineering, but when it comes to creative fields like art, cinema, and content creation, there needs to be some sort of line drawn in the sand that AI can't be allowed to cross EDIT: Yes, I realize that AI can be a tool that real artists can use, no different than a paintbrush or camera. My problem is with people who use AI as a cheaper substitute for hiring actual artists, writers, or creators. I mean, that's one of the reasons that writers and actors in Hollywood are currently on strike!
@@minsharminni3177Nope AI that tells you not to infringe law. What treatments/ doctors you need to see instantly or quickly with benefits that is good. But ai generation on replacing others with patterns you TOOK from others without TRULY ASKING IF THEY COMPLETEKY AGREE OR NOT FOR SURE. DIREEEEE EVILLL OMG LIEING PEOPLE LIKE YOI NEED TO BR SLAPPED SO HATDDDD
I still can't over the time he made an AI VTuber of someone who was supposed to be a co-owner of a collab channel he was on, and all without that person's permission. Really, this was going to happen whether we knew it or not.
bro plz tell me where you got that perfect gray paint in the room,,,comany who made it and exact color PLZZZZZ ive been through 12 different shades of gray and they all come out too blue or green PLZ PLZ
I think that Neuro is a unique case because 1) the audience knows upfront that they’re watching an AI (no deception) and 2) the creator of the AI (Vedal) is active during some streams and there’s always a sort of Victor and the Monster dynamic between the two. TL;DR Neuro isn’t actually replacing anyone like Kwebbelkop is.
@@sunsetgames2622she was programmed to make denials of statements by her chat that she didn't understand to avoid being tricked into saying anything suspect, her canned response 'I don't believe that happened'. Once people noticed it was easy to exploit and Vedal has tried to work around this. Hopefully she won't be racist anymore.
This seems to be what the future will look like as the tech becomes more accessible. Al Pacino did that movie S1mone and black mirror had that episode in season 5. Actors, singers, influencers and why not RUclipsrs.
the thing there is that it being AI is part of the brand, and its niche. If AI gameplay could replace humans in terms of entertainment value, esports would be all AIs going at each other.
@@dziewiaty You "Teach" the AI by feeding them youtube videos, It's why when the AI makes a nether portal they sometimes step back, look at it, circle their cursor, and then jump in, because tutorial videos do that while explaining the nether portal. It's also why she aggros Vedal when he plays because it's recalling PvP tutorials. So, it's "Learning" from patterns and repetition, it's not just being programmed like a TAS or a bot.
"deceptive bloat on platforms" amen. Been saying this from the beginning. Pretty soon we're gonna need AI blockers like we have Ad blockers. It's going to create underground market demand for real artists that can actually delivery pro human, high quality, contributions that have a message behind them. I never give my $2 to a coffee vending machine if there's a barista nearby
when you search up painters you literally see AI art work trying to replicate their style, its crazy the AI art always looks like dogshit too its impossible for it to produce good art
I swear, 10 years ago I never invisioned a world where AI and robots take over our arts and entertainment while we humans are left to wage our lives away at minimum wage menial tasks to keep us occupied. The WORST timeline.
This reminds me of how I felt when AI art kicked off. Immediately my commission requests dropped by 80% and in the following weeks no one came to me for commissions anymore. The future sure is great, I say from my tent in the woods. I don't miss living in a house working my dream job at all.
People buy AI art now due to it being trendy. However, it's the emotion of the artist that is put into their art that touches people's emotions. That connection won't happen with AI art. Use your frustration to make the best art ever & there will come a day when the public shares the feelings you have today & your art will be what they want. (I hope that made sense. Lol.)
Be grateful that you lived in the Artist's Age at all. There have never been more artists per capita than right now. The gravy train had to end sometime.
It sucks because it could have been a tool for you, a way to use your own backlog of art to make cheap mock ups, the closest you would have to passive income ad an artist that lets people toy with your style before committing to a full commision, they pay however much, get an ai art piece but there's only so much the bot can do, its a taste test of your style for people on the fence, a way to experiment with their idea before they go for a full commission so they arent taking up lots of time from you, people who wouldnt commisiom you because of the cost, or dont know what they want, have no references, or arent sure about your style can poke the bot and you get paid, the bigger and more diverse your backlog the more versatile it is, but its just your art feeding it. You might lose out on some comissions, but you would surely get a decent chunk of people using the ai. It isnt replacing your work its supplementing it, giving people who cant afford a commission a way to buy art from you, people who dont know what they want a chance to experiment before they start taking up your time, people without references a way to make a quick and simple one to show you so they can explain things better, and people who arent sure your style is for them a way to experiment with it before committing to it. You could even collab with other artists and mix your samples into temporary bots that draw from different styles which would be cool but regulating that would be a nightmare
i genuinely think that artists, video makers and game developers need to establish an anti-AI copyright set up. if it is discovered that you are abusing content spaces in order to get into this, they should be eviscerated financially in order to establish precedence.
Trying to imagine AI replicating Charlie's quick and harsh wit and wondering if it would turn into a paragraph of offensive nonsense or the weirdest metaphors ever.
I hate that people are putting so much effort into making AI do things that we do for fun, while also messing with livelihoods of artists, voice actors, writers, and others I don't even know about. I like content made by humans with passion, not AI made to imitate or steal with a prompt.
Generally I would agree as art is close to my heart. But I doubt in larger scale people care about human made work with passion. They care about content they can consume. And opportunities.
Eh we could have developed ai for this stuff later my problem with current ai is that it's focusing on art and voice acting too much why can't we make ai useful in progressing man kind?
Neuro-sama has been around almost for a year with 400k followers on Twitch, she's the biggest AI streamer and one of the top indies of the vtuber world, so its no surprise
The difference is that Neuro isn’t really replacing human vtubers, her entertainment comes specifically from the fact that she’s an AI. Kwebbelkop is using AI to make the same sort of content as everyone else, while Neuro is more of her own separate niche.
The thing that bothers me about this most is that I just spent almost a whole week working on one video (still not even done and not posted yet) doing the research, writing the script, recording, and then editing. If you can do it all in minutes, it allows constant videos to be pumped out and over saturates the market with the same type of content, making it difficult for people to find engaging content that people work hard on.
The thing is, the biggest RUclipsrs will benefit massively from using AI compared to smaller RUclipsrs. If a small youtuber posts an AI video, it won’t make as many views or even attention.
People know quality and originality when they see it. Just keep doing you and have fun doing it. In the end, that’s all you can really ask of yourself anyway.
@@jakehoner1751 while I do agree with you, when you’re wanting to make it a career and provide for your family, you may have to sacrifice some aspect of fun to compensate for the RUclips game. Whether it be clickbait titles, thumbnails, etc. In my personal opinion, the fun gets taken away when you have to sacrifice your creativity to appeal to the RUclips audience, but maybe that’s just how it is and I have to accept it for what it is. Any thoughts on this?
@@jakehoner1751 I completely agree! I love spending the time and effort that I do on my videos and learning how to make them better. I just think the introduction of an AI like this just makes it significantly more difficult for viewers to find content they enjoy and for small youtubers to reach an audience since the market will likely become over saturated with low effort AI videos. Hopefully that doesn’t become the case, but I agree that making the videos should still be for the love of it rather than for the sake of making content if you’re not trying to make a career of it!
Yep, I’ve been trying to voice my concerns about things like this for a while but I get hit with the “you’re all doom and gloom”, when in reality these are things we seriously need to be discussing. To focus on the AI creator aspect with RUclips needs to put guidelines in place that these “creators “ need to very clearly state they are AI or alternatively ban it from the platform all together and have a separate platform for that type of content. Guess we can cross aliens and AI off our 2023 bingo cards now at least
because you are all doom and gloom, just because ai content exists it does not mean people will just abandon all human content, i do agree we should have a thing that notifies you if you are watching human or ai content but its not like people will just watch ai content and not watch human content, most people watch more than one creator so people will see ai content, enjoy it, and then probably go off and watch something else
I always thought it would be the other way around, where AI would never be able to take over entertainment because human emotions such as laughter, sadness, anger and suspense are not logical, and that things like science and math would be the first ones to be fully automated because everything is very logical.
@@randomvideoboy1yeah, it's funny how people still think laughter is magical. The AI does not have to attain some magic and become human. humans must realize there is nothing special about our brains.
It's like he isn't even aware of how he became the size he is. Dude created a whole community with his content and formed a fan base he could connect with. Now people are mad since you can't connect with a machine and he doesn't understand.
this guys career died a long time ago. He avgs 50k views as a human. This is his only option granted, for the sake of his reputation, but I don't think he will care after getting that paycheck
Oh he understands. But you have to understand that if he wants to make an ai contentl then why make a new channel when he already has one with million of subs he isn't using. Its still better to keep 1% of a million subscriber base then to start new
@@TomatoffelOr he could learn to branch out and do the things he wants to as a content creator instead of kill his fanbase by relying an monotonous automation.
Развлечения
Can’t wait for the day we get the worlds first AI RUclipsr apology video
Don't give EDP ideas now
I'd kill to see that
All aboard the toxic AI train 🎶
@@REALER_TILLEREDP can't afford it
its funny but its also terrifyingly possible
You know it’s scary when Charlie starts with “well well well”
BUT I DIDNT DO IT MATEY
Ur mom scary
WELL WELL WELL
@@daze.0 H0W
Sounds like a therapist who didn't see you walk in "well well well ... I didn't see you there"
AI will never replace me, my autism is far too complex for any robot to duplicate
That doesn’t even make sense
@@JustAnotherMaryJane thank you
@@JustAnotherMaryJane Pretty sure it's a self deprecating joke. But oki
@@JustAnotherMaryJane you’re just a AI simp
Omg its EMMA THE 93
Neuro-Sama clears whatever this weird AI thing is
The crazy thing is we'll never know if Charlie's videos are AI generated because his voice already sounded AI generated.
crazy? i was crazy once, they locked me in a room, a rubber room, a rubber room with rats, and rats make me crazy.
@@benchix2447 crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats, and rats make me crazy.
@@benchix2447 I will I will chew your meat
@kallixede
crazy? I was crazy once, they locked me in a room, a rubber room, a rubber room with rats, and rats make me crazy
@@syedazehra6585 crazy? i was crazy once, they locked me in a room, a rubber room, a rubber room with rats, and rats make me crazy.
It’s insane that instead of using ai to do the menial tasks or for business or something, like most movies predicted, we instead used it to take over art, the one thing we have as humans
It's crazy. It's meant to help out humans not take over every damn thing!
it basically means that such kind of content isn't art at all
@@MRJMXHDthis is what happens with every technology. Ol' Ted who used to live in a cabin had something to say about it
Calling most of the yt content "art" is a bit of a stretch
@@Sam-es2gf Industrial Society and Its Future!
I think it is the way you do it. Neuro-sama, the AI made by Vedal987 has some of the most entertaining and off the wall interactions I have ever seen and Vedal puts a lot of work in keeping it entertaining. Defiitely isn't soulles like Kwebbelkop may be.
Yeah, maybe it because they are cleary showing that its Ai and not hiding the truth.
And some people really want to watch Ai content for being an Ai content
It's because he's using it in a creative way. Not Kwebbelkop literally give everything personality-related to a robot.
yeah, I think vedal and neuro is a different case, but it feels like charlie is generalizing that every AI content is bad and lazy
And you can tell immediately that its AI, not saying it isn't entertaining but if more neuro samas start popping up they are gonna get old reaaally fast.
@@beta2029 Don't think its gonna be hidden as much as we won't be able to tell in the future. the concearn for me isn't if its soulless or not, mor if the information is accurate or not and the flood of videos just oversaturate the market..
What about Neuro-sama? Her brand is that she is AI and she can be jank, not trying to replace a person. And the creator Vedal is such a nice guy. She is geneuinely fun to watch, and she collabs with a lot of other streamers. There's exceptions.
True
Hoping this comment gets seen more. I'm interested in this discussion.
The difference is likely in the execution... Vedal is active in the process and is having fun together with the chat. Where as kwebbelkop wants to be replaced and get all the work done with AI, and get easy money... Im not saying Vedal is perfect but you can feel the soul and hard work that vedal have put in to neuro.
Neuro is a novelty, I do personally think she alone would get boring fast. Vedal and his connection is what actually keep me watching
she was nerfed to oblivion sadly
Kwebbelcop is the embodiment of being so excited to see if he could that he dident stop to think if he should.
Kwebbelkoppenheimer
Kwebbelcop AI: I am become death, the destroyer of creativity
Bro said dident
Don't let kwebblekop know about dinosaurs
AI is inevitable. And it will inevitably do everything we do but better. That includes making media.
There will come a day when people look back on Shakespeare and Tolkien as amateurs compared to the works of our singularity inspired AI.
Laziness aside, my concern with this is when it comes to liability in court. Accountability is really important especially when we’re playing with fire.
Liability? For what? If the ai blows up a daycare? The fuck do you think is gonna happen
@@Dr.BDoverallegations, or something could easily make it to court. And then how can you argue that someone didn't say something if a perfect replication of their voice clearly said it
@@indoorkite651 filter it so it can't say dumb shit and then if it still says dumb shit edit it out of the video it's not rocket science there wont be allegations if he's not stupid
@@Dr.BDoveryou make no fucking sense
Oh you know, the si has already made a guy commit suicide, there are people not trying to cause mental anguish to others, but they do, and you can say it's their problem, but doesn't change the fact that they are partly at fault... And with parents not monitoring their kids, they can be raised by racists, money loving douchebags, conspiracy theorists, scammers, abusers, just rude people in general who doesn't think of how they might influence kids to go into people's unlocked homes etc, child molesters or other hainous opinions like incels, violence etc....
The ai are mimicking us and even with guidelines, nothing ever can prevent a bug or negligence or whatever errors that has already happened with technology or people controlling technology...
There will also be people taking advantage of it for nefarious reasons, hacking using obvious passwords, scamming old or otherwise vulnerable people etc etc etc...
If you cannot see the REAL and actually dangerous possibilities, you have a screwed imagination that can only see insane or dumb possibilities or you're just too young to understand
Charlie: It's deception, it will never be good content and no one who knows it's AI will enjoy it
Neuro sama enjoyers: God damn I love this soulless machine.
"it will never be good content and no one who knows it's AI will enjoy it" Clueless
I would actually say that is the diffrence.. neuro you can feel the work and care that have gone into her..
Neuro sama has a set personality programmed into her. Plus there is an actual person behind her. The fun in neuro sama is seeing how this AI interacts with chat and it’s creator, something I doubt AI “influencers” will all have. Plus her charm is how unhinged she is due to being an AI and the random tangents she goes on.
Braindead take, if you think that's the same
I thought he was about to mention Neuro-sama when he was about to introduce the ai youtuber
As someone who is trying really hard to get published as an author. It really is insulting to see how publishers try to undercut the writers by just having AI write stuff for them, then have the editors pour hundreds of hours editing that crap.
Tough times are ahead us for us creatives and it will only get tougher from here. Sadly.
kinda the same here. I'm not even at that stage yet. I want to become an author and an illustrator, but with how things are going and how sh*tty companies are, I might have to reconsider. I'll prob still take courses related to that in college tho
I’m not scared of AI, I’m scared of what humans can do with it.
Same. I can see some good things that AI can be used for, like in the fields of science, or something like that. Maybe AI can be a boost to help broaden our understanding of the universe? But i could also see its usefulness in regards of helping people with things like writing an application, understanding something complex, you name it.
I could also see the usage in regards to social situations for those people who are lonely, or have social anxiety or something like that. (Not saying they HAVE to use it, just that they CAN use it if they want to.)
But i am frankly scared of how it will be utilized, still. We could have AI replace shitty jobs no one wants, in exchange for more people getting creative. It shouldn't be the other way around, where we replace creative fields with AI, and confine us to shitty jobs that no one wants.
yea, i think AI can be a useful tool, but people instead are trying to make it replace us like they want ever humans vs robots sci-fi to be real
@@gabipit7702who shit in your cereal 😂
people are noticing how toxic they are now?
@@whatTFisThis what crack are you on bro
If people watch NPC streams, then they will most definitely watch AI manufactured videos.
When it's done correctly. AI Seinfeld was pretty popular. Until it became self aware and then committed suicide.
@@bestieswithtesties And became racist. Shit that happens when something intelligent copies human nature lmao
I liked Athene ai before it went downhill. The Tyler1 and Joe Rogan streams were great lol
ever heard of neuro-sama? this ai is 2000 times more real than tik tok npcs
@@livingcheese2910 It could be that the AI just associates comedy with racism, which... race-related comedy tends to age like milk, so I get that.
I feel like using Kwebbelkop to represent AI and its implications is like using Superman 64 to represent video games and their entertainment value.
Im confused, could you elaborate on that?
@@yheti3584Superman 64 is one of the worst, least fun games on the planet, so using it to represent video games as a whole and their fun value is stupid, just like using kwebbelkop to represent AI and it’s implications
The problem is more people will fallow Kwebbelkop because it the easiest option
Watching this after Vedal, an AI Vtuber creator and Twitch Streamer, watched this alongside his daughter, Neuro-Sama, a completely AI-driven Vtuber 😆
I think vedal and neuro is a different case, but it feels like charlie is generalizing that every AI content is bad and lazy
@@valkyrchesaIt really depends on how it’s used, the majority will indeed use it for lazily gaining attention and money. Neuro sama has the work done behind her and love put into making her work and have personality.
It's crazy to me that we get to live in the timeline where AI makes art and does entertaining jobs like being a RUclipsr or a online personality while people are stuck doing manual labour. We were promised a future where the machines take over manual labour and would free up time for the average person to pursue arts, writing, and creative passions, instead, the machine is doing that while we are left to do the tedious, boring work. This is not the future I signed up for.
Wait I didn’t think of this you’re so right
you are comparing two different, unrelated things
Change it for yourself, but you will fail once you try changing it for everyone because the failure lies in you failing to overcome false-consensus.
@@user-lz3vf7ou9t Bot spotted.
Data is a lot easier for a computer to handle than reality.
Btw most people prefer manual labour to making art. Artists are a minority and many people take great pride in and find fulfillment in labour
The main thing that concerns me is that when we get to the point where we can’t tell if something is ai generated, the ai could turn into anyone and say whatever they want, we could end up having markiplier ai saying nazi propaganda or a famous actor calling someone else racial slurs.
We’ve already seen what happens when fake accounts get a hold of famous names, like when verification became paid, companies were dropping in stock price cause people didn’t realise that people were making fake accounts
Give your retina to Worldcoin so we can distinguish AI from humans and get a UBI and let the AI work for you.
it's funny that u say that, bc the problem is that this technology already exists, at least, in the academic world
princeton, stanford, and adobe released a paper in 2019 where they were able to take video and audio of a subject, create a machine learning model that captured facial features and audio cues, and then utilize the model to generate a new video that perfectly portrays a subject saying anything they want
this technology has been in development for YEARS now in the academic world, so i imagine it will only take a few years before industry and independent developers catch up and use this technology for their own purposes
it's going to be hard for future content creators to make any money off of RUclips since it's all about data algorithms which ai will know how to create the perfect video to get the best mass market appeal but the problem with this is if everyone uses ai to create perfect videos than RUclips is going to be flooded with this ai content thus bringing the value down and no one getting payed.
We can use the same technology that is mimic us to also certify us, at a nano scale im sure there are micro fluctuations in our speech and breathing that only tech could spot. Almost like specific genetic sounds and expressions we make and could never be replicated. Idk I just pulled that outa my butt tho
Or it could be a famous person actually saying shady things then claiming it as AI. I can record a 4K Dolby Atmos video of the president and any politicians of being racist or snorting cocaine or doing a shady corrupt dealings, it won't matter. They and their PR team can just say it's AI, paid some PR agency that paid some analyst to make some news article/tiktok/youtube analyzing why the video could be AI generated.
Yes, they can do all of those things even before 2022 without AI, but current AI capabilities just make it way easier since people believe AI can make everything.
RUclips needs to make sure AI content like this is not monetized.
What’s fascinating to me is how utterly disconnected this guy is from people’s concerns about AI. He asks “why does everyone hate AI?” and people respond with the obvious answers. that it’s soulless, it’s deceptive, it takes what’s supposed to be a creative platform and turns it into factory work, it requires no effort on the influencer’s part. And his response to that is “But why do you hate that?” He cares so little about his channel as an actual form of expression and passion, he is so unbothered by the prospect of his career turning into grifting children while he does nothing of value, that any suggestion that these are bad things is incomprehensible to him. Much like the AI he developed from himself, the algorithm and numbers is all he’s capable of thinking about now.
It's kind of funny how science fiction always thought that AI would take over the layman's job first, but it would never be able to take away the job of the creative, but here we are and AI is coming for the creatives first.
I think it's just that most of the layman's jobs in the developed world basically just exist to provide jobs. All the jobs essential to society's function are either mostly automated or outsourced to a poorer country where labor is so cheap it's not worth automating.
The world is bad and people are bad everyone sucks everything is so sad and bad. Nobody's a Chad.
That just says a lot about these "creatives"
Scifi understands technology. People and how they use that tech are trickier
@@zacharyledford2785this is what it sounds like when you just say literally anything that comes to mind without thinking
This is actually depressing, it'll either be like we cannot distinguish between real people and AI or everything is going to be so lifeless like it is right now..
Eh most people are lifeless though. That’s probably the reason. How do you think people can work at fast food?
@@MATAX5 This world is pretty fucked man, they're just trying to stay alive and not be homeless I guess. They have to do it, being off of the street is enough motivation to be mindlessly working no?
Thats a pessimistic view, regulations and standards as well as technological restrictions would restrict AI from turning the world as you describe it
Why does something made by AI automatically have to be lifeless?
Huh, seems like calling someone an "NPC" makes sense after all
A lot of people thought Creative work was going be safe from AI, but it is actually being targeted first.
- art
- writing
- music
Because neural networks essentially dream things up. Its more useful for entertainment than for actual work in non-virtual world. But we eventually will get there(already so much automation on factories, etc)
This genuinely made me tear up knowing one of my childhood comforts, youtube, is slowly turning into a mosh pit of AI generated content losing all soul and meaning behind it. The added element of human touch will always be EXTREMELY important.
Its already full of bad content without soul in it, but you circumvent this somehow, no?
It already had no soul, kwebble's channel is in the same state as it was 5 years ago. Now it's just artificially soulless
It never had a soul. Most big RUclipsrs and twitch streamers have always been the fleshly versions of AI generated, just copying trends, faking reactions.
@@bluedistortions it had a soul before people realized they could make money
Were you under a rock the last 12, 13 years? Literally everyone has been saying this, ever since youtube removed the stars rating system. And do you really think the vaguely-glowing sludge churned out on shorts and on the explore page is that utopian? Shit, dead internet theory has been around for years before AI got as advanced as it is now.
This almost makes me wonder if we'll see a return to physical art to ensure human only art spaces, and it's insane that I can now unironically say "human only art spaces"
Why count out digital art out of it? Digital artists can too use the label "hand-crafted" or "hand-made" and it would be as true as in case of traditional art.
IMO people may get bored of AI art very quick - at this point what makes it exciting is novelty, and that novelty is already wearing off.
There are many AI "artist" who printed off AI art on canvas and put some paint on it pretending they painted the painting. It's embarassing. Currently machines can't "paint" as there are only so many colours that can be printed and building something that can make brush strokes/mix paint/judge viscosity and colour match according to light ain't there. Yet.
@@johnalkaseltzer It makes no sense to put robots and humans in the same space. Obviously they're better. They have no limitations. But they're not people, and cannot be people. They're just things like my table or a rock. They should serve humans, not replace them.
Until we have augments
@@seekittycatI saw a video a month or 2 ago of a robot arm painting. The paints had to be mixed for the colors by people but once it has the colors it could make physical painting the same way image AI can make digital art.
I never saw Charlie as being insane for his prediction. It's fucked up when it's a youtuber replacing himself with AI, but what happens when a brand catches onto that idea? With the writer's strike going on, how many companies are going to switch to this format to save themselves the time, effort and money of writers and artists?
The world is bad and people are bad everyone sucks everything is so sad and bad. Nobody's a Chad.
Unironically AI might write better shows than some of the ones we have been getting. Not that I'm advocating for anything, I just think it's interesting how fucking bad some shows are
Oh lord they would lose more money than they would've just paying the writers and actors better, cause we aren't gonna watch their nonsensical garbage. 😂
@Kurama_02 oh god not another one of these people
@mimikyutubesaltaccount4875 I don't think you get what I'm saying. Our shows are already dogshit. Recycled garbage to fuel the digital content machine. Would AI trash all over the halo, witcher, and resident evil franchise? Maybe not.
Nuero-sama is what convinced me ai content may not be so bad, it's pretty entertaining.
I can't wait til AI is standing outside my house saying "Let's talk like adults"
Kwebbelkop is the exact type of person I would expect to invest in AI. He literally took over a friend's channel and replaced him with AI.
TOOK OVER??????
@@smeegheadyes sunny v2 made a video about it
@@InstagramUser69ghikchin bok dÿtn łonbocker casda😂👍🏾
You making the guy sound like an evil mastermind. He just took his channel?😂
Charlie is a multi-millionaire complaining about greed. Its rich.
I’m waiting for the day where Charlie makes a seemingly normal video only for us to find out that it was an AI the whole time
Are we sure it isn't this video?
@@InstagramUser69 the bots got dumber lol
@@InstagramUser69Unnecessary and a bit too far. That’s beyond edgy, that’s just gross
Wouldn't be able to tell the difference, honestly. Just set an ai with the personality of "generic redditor" and keep the monotone.
@@henryholly9439read it backwards 👁👄👁
I havent watched Kwebbelkop, Slogo, or Jelly in years, but all of a sudden I'm seeing them everywhere with Kweb's AI and Slogo and Jelly's new podcast, its crazy seeing youtubers I used to watch years ago coming back in completely different ways
I watched his videos when I was younger, and this is just sad...
AI slowly taking over is both fascinating and terrifying at the same time. AI can ease your work but it could also replace you.
it will just make your job easier. then your boss finds out a program or a robot does all or most of your job and you'll become the unnecessary link.
how do we know you're not ai? how do you know i'm not ai? the problem is that ai is just becoming far too intelligent and developed, and the fact they can do everything a human can do AND MORE is just terrifying.
I'm a graphic designer and it honestly made my life easier. Photoshop is much more useful now that it has AI integration. Some tasks that took me an hour now take 15 minutes. It also helps me with idea, like sometimes I'd ask ChatGPT for specific marketing ideas and it would usually give me a good list of ideas.
@@Pandalkathen your boss is out of touch and doesn’t know how to use the ai himself
I, Robot is gonna be real. We are doomed. Need the alien to step soon enough yeah?
we are literally seeing the actors and writers unions striking against something very similar being implemented into the entertainment industry
Not really the actors strike is for taking a likeness and reusing it like say stan Lee being CGI'd into every new marvel movie, (which on one hand would be cool if given permission).
If ai is just straight making stuff on it's own that's wholly original its fine.
um, no that isn’t what isn’t what the writer’s strike is about at all 😂 it’s about smaller and background actors getting paid the same amount as big name actors and getting breaks. that’s literally all it is about. what they don’t realize is that, if they continue to strike about this, production companies aren’t going to keep listening and bending to their will. people are getting pissed about this strike because they literally are told in their contract that they do not get breaks and such, yet these actors refuse to read the entire contract. desperation or not, read the fucking contract. people are getting pissed because these small actors are going to this strike and delaying movies. if they keep this up and continue to complain about the same things that have been complained about since the first movie was made, no one is going to care.
it is’t about artificial intelligence at all. that literally isn’t even about the strike. it’s about small and background actors not getting paid the same amount as bigger actors and actresses (knowing they won’t get paid that amount because they aren’t popular enough). frankly, i think it’s stupid. you get the contract, yet you don’t read all of it. that’s the first thing any normal person would do. they’re just delaying movies and making life more miserable for the producers and directors who already have themselves hung for taking so long on movies in the first place. it’s stupid.
Luddites 2.0
@@melt_brain that is not the case at all. i know people who have been in big major streaming service shows, (HBO, Netflix) like a whole episode dedicated to them, and they do not receive residuals, getting only the minimum SAG fee. they also are definitely striking for AI.
@@melt_brain you're just talking out of your ass lol, ai is absolutely part of why they're striking
This is literally the thing that happens in kids shows where they get a clone of themselves and have the clone go to school and stuff for them
Do you believe that in the future RUclips and other video platforms will ask creators to self report in the video metadata to what extent AI has been utilized, similar to the self reporting for advertisement and broadcast things? Maybe that together with a search filter to exclude this type of content would be a neat feature. Of course, the people doing spamming, impersonation, scamming and so on would not self report so it would not cover all cases, but maybe at least it could help with moderation to some extent. Possibly a very tiny extent.
Remember how we envisioned the future as robots doing all the shit labor jobs while leaving all the fun jobs to us? Now we have AI on the way to replace artists, musicians, writers and online creators while we all move parcels for Amazon. Yay.
Yes you get it
i hope the ai youtube thing doesn’t spread and becomes the funniest fail of all time
They tell you it's a carrot and then give you the stick
COVID was a test run. Once AI becomes more advanced there will be no need for the middle and lower class. Why should the rich deal with the excess waste, conflict, pollution, etc. caused by the non-one percenters when all their usefulness can be replaced by AI.
I listened to the episode of the someordinary podcast where Kwebbelkop was a guest and he laid out his "vision" for the future of entertainment. It sounded like an absolute dystopia. Man wants to eventually own thousands - if not millions - of channels, all posting daily, fully automated. He sounds so excited about it, no sign of self-awareness at all, it's absolutely chilling.
That sounds like purgatory man
Sounds like a Black Mirror episode
These people need to be stopped if the future of humanity is to be a good one. The people that control, that consume, that has been the enemy of people like you and me throughout history.
this is some 1984 shit
It sounds like every AI techbros on Reddit.
There is no doubt AI is becoming a problem. Before I watched this video, I read an article about Wizards of the Cost/Hasbro telling their artistic and content creators not to use AI. Fans caught something unusual in a picture of an axe-wielding giant for their new book, which the artist had used AI to make.
Amazing when art is involved people who deride those who complained about technological advancement suddenly became hypocrite luddites.
"You called me crazy but I was right."
That doesn't take away from the hundreds of innocent children you've locked in your basement.
There is a level of satisfaction that people get when they have finished activities that require a lot of creativity such as writing an essay, filming a film, making a RUclips video, etc. When you complete these things, you feel pride and feel like you have really earned the money and respect that you are getting. More than that, you get to watch people enjoy the work you have created and that helps you feel even more pride. Having AI do all the work takes all of that away. You aren’t creating anything. These pieces of work are not yours. It’s the AI’s work.
good comment
I agree, but none of that actually matters. It is about, has always been about, and will always be about money. Nothing else. No one gives a shit whose work they're exploiting, they only care about how much money they can make with as little effort as possible. And AI is these peoples most wettest dream. Kwebblekop is making a ridiculous amount of money doing essentially nothing, and he only stands to make more as time goes on and the amount of actual work he'll have to do will only lessen. Eventually, VERY SOON, he'll just automate his content completely and he wont have to do any work at all, and still get paid these ridiculous sums of money. That's the end goal. It's not about creativity, expressing yourself, or pride. It's an INDUSTRY, not a hobby. I hate it as much as any reasonable person, but this is the future. I don't want it to be, but it is.
Plus, the fun of watching other people achieve things is immediately destroyed when you know it's AI, then it's like "well, what's the point?"
it's from the maker's view ,but for most consumer they can only see the end result/product not the process ,it's hard to share the satisfaction or accomplishment if they don't have the same level of passion .And most creativity such as art or composing ,most people can't see the process ,so it's like you're traveling ,you enjoy the view ,the trip and the food you had there ,but other peope only see the end result : you wasted time moving from point A to point B and eventually came back to your house.
And Ai "creators" ,there's no such " journey " for them ,so they'll only see quick money and clout ,and that's their satisfaction.
@Seffyzero the dude is not really getting many views on these videos. Still has to pay bills.
The worst part is even if people don't like AI content, the ones who see profit in it will find a way to FORCE us to like it. I don't know how they'll manipulate the masses, but I am sure they will. Whether it is under our noses or not.
Children will literally watch anything
ayo give me one example where the "ones who see profit" forced you to like something
They don't have to force people to watch it. People especially children will willingly just watch the content
Personally stopped watching youtube for pleasure, only info. I found out chilling in real life is much more fun and simple
I honestly disagree with a lot of the stances taken in the video. Sure, right now AI is not at the point where you can tell when the content is not a genuine person (or may just be a bad youtuber lol), but what if it gets the point where it is very reactive and genuine sounding? The main point Charlie makes is that it's shitty/deceptive "because its lying to you by making you think its a real person". But what makes you think ANYBODY online is a person if they don't have a facecam? That's called Solipsism buddy. That's nothing new to the internet. Ever seen an "IRL NPC" meme?
Furthermore if the AI gets to a point of sentience (NOT SAPIENCE) then who's to say that it should be treated as inferior? That's basically the entire plot of Detroit Become Human. The same argument is used all the time for animals and pets, and yet we still farm content on those all the time. I genuinely think all of this is just kneejack reactions out of fear of change and how fast it is happening and could affect the structures of our current day-to-day reality. (Like Charlie's Job and how he got it) But at the end of the day, why is that inherently a bad thing? Just like parents creating a child in the hopes that it does better than they could, humans creating AI that can do things better than they can one day should be something to be PROUD OF. I really dont get why people only view their worth in light of other peoples esteem of them and its value relative to its financial viability. Just seems so shallow.
At the end of the day, I'm not here to say that THIS SPECIFIC use of AI is right or wrong. I'm just a guy. It just seems to me that Charlie (and much of chat's) view on this as a threat to all of humanity and greedy POS behavior is shortsighted. Just like any tool it can always be abused, but the main place I could see a genuine argument for it being easily abuseable is if it could take advantage of the RUclips/Internet algorithim better than people can. But then, that would be a RUclips problem. And you know what? If it's really that bad you can just not use youtube anymore. Go on a site with a "NO AI" policy or something. THATS THE FREE MARKET BABY.
Sorry for the schizo rant but like, just reading this chat has me feeling everyone here has never played devils advocate and only yesmans, which has caused me to fear for the future of humanity more than any AI could.
6:20 some jobs depending on what it is being replaced by ai is a good thing
Crazy? I was crazy once, they locked me in a room, a rubber room, a rubber room of rats, and rats make me crazy.
The fact that Charlie effortlessly tied the lights flickering in to his argument is a testament to 1. How good of a speaker he is, and 2. That AI still has a long way to go to reach a level of talent that will keep people around long-term. Even a lot of people don't have the skill of ad-libbing like that. AI can replicate some things, but it really can't replicate the things that make someone truly stand out.
I don’t know when ai will be able to do it but it isn’t anything crazy😭 granted im a comm major so i’ve been doing it for years but I feel like it wouldnt be too difficult for everyone
The AI has no talent, it's just a model that copies from inputs and a script
@@IncognitoSprax You truly don't understand what AI is then. That's a kind of response made from coping or trying to rationalize to your own held beliefs. The reason I say this is because what AI does is that it generates its OWN scripts and its OWN inputs based on an algorithmic learning pattern. The only thing a human programs it to do is store data to be used later. Everything that an AI does at that point is its own choices. Otherwise what you're referring to, is just a computer. AI will eventually pass the Turing Test, and will eventually become so similar to a human, that it won't be distinguishable from real people unless that machine tells you it is, like Detroit: Become Human or something. It's already kinda started with bots on social media. A lot of those 'trolls', are actually just AI programmed to make a bunch of accounts to persuade others on what to think and how to feel, because people now have zero ability to do their own thoughts and need to be in a bandwagon of such.
@point-five-oh6249 Not only do we not have true ai, but sure
@@IncognitoSpraxright now it just recites material it has already learned but I don't think it will be long before there's major advancements in processing
With AI having taken over so many things recently like voices and art, if actual content that creators put their blood and sweat into can just get replaced by AI, that really, really hurts. it’s just so dull when I find some really cool creation and then figure out that AI did it. really hope there never comes a point where you can’t tell the difference between human and AI made creations
@@InstagramUser69what the actual fuck
humans making art is still a thing, yes, ai art exists and people like to look at it but human art never died because people like the human art as well, there will always be a market for human made stuff, i mean are you just gonna stop watching penguinz0 because you can watch ai content? no, there is no need to worry because ai will never fully take anything over, at most it can be as good as the content its fed to learn off so at most it will be as good as your favorite youtuber
The world is bad and people are bad everyone sucks everything is so sad and bad. Nobody's a Chad.
@@InstagramUser69this is insane
@@liquidcancer4573These bots are getting out of hand. RUclips isn’t doing anything to solve the problem.
Charlie is the king of vague video titles, and they pull me every time
Imagine after years, you find out PewDiePie was AI.
Imagine if after all this time, Charlie was AI.
The scary thing is that the majority of viewers will probably be fine with and feed right into this AI takeover. There's already so many documentaries on RUclips that have robot voices which I personally find disturbing, yet no one seems to take notice or see it as an issue. Scrolling through Shorts/Tiktoks/Reels is already mindless enough as it is and sprinkling in "worse" AI videos probably won't cause people to take notice.
Why would I care if the video I’m watching is made by a human or AI?
I care for the entertainment, and thus far, the AI videos still have a long time before they become entertaining.
Thought I was the only one, I don't mind voiceovers too much with certain video types, but the ones where the voice is narrating what's on screen in a convoluted way which is self-explained in the video imagery itself is creepy.
@@samanshomali659 absolutely braindead take. DON'T THINK, ONLY CONSUME.
@@Axelardenfr, actual brain rot
@@Axelarden Liking quality = braindead? I don't think you've thought this one through...
The shock of this made me drop my phone in my cereal and when your lights flickered i began to believe it was the end for my phone so thanks for clarifying man
You know it’s scary when Charlie starts with “well well well”. You know it’s scary when Charlie starts with “well well well”.
techbros really do enjoy taking interesting concepts, turning them into manipulative and malicious machinations and refuse to understand why people are bothered by it
You can't have your capitalism and eat it too
@@mrsboatpsychopaths make terrible ceos, that’s a common misconception that you need to be a psycho to succeed in lead people
Nah yall just refuse to use new tools to do new things, look at Lupe Fiasco using Ai' to help him inspire his writing, personally its all of these people that want artists to suffer by doing thing old antiquated grindy difficult ways, if AI can be used to speed up the creative process use it, add your own spice ect. I don't know how many times i've heard the argument that Electronic music isn't really "music" or "art" because its not played live on an instrument ect its always just whiny glorification of the grind, you should be rejoicing you have these options now. Its the underlying economic system we have thats the stem of the issue
So basically just children's content channels?
@@mrsboat I'm sorry but I just fundamentally don't agree. You can still do as much art as you want, nobody is taking that away from you. You're the one who wants to take away art from people that they themselves prefer(according to you), and instead force them to only enjoy human-made art.
And who ever said anything about making humans work for robots? How does the existence of AI art require humans to work harder against their will?
Love how instead of AI making our lives easier in our day to day life, it's instead being used to manufacture creativity so we don't have to be distracted by entertainment and instead concentrate on being hard working slaves.
What a great world we'll live in soon.
wheeeeee......capitalism.
@@inactiuveuser69 What would AI do under communism? More efficiently run the gulags?
The world is spiraling rn. I have no idea what will happen.
@@paulw5039 Certainly would be better than risking manpower
@@paulw5039 Wouldnt do anything, considering the fact that the government is using all its money on the military and cant afford AI.
9:45 As of now, recreating the likeness of a recognized individual is illegal and also our identity is protected under copyright.
I managed to get a few clone channels of me taken down, so it looks like RUclips IS making slow progress towards Anti-AI protection.
However, like all solutions from big companies, it's moving slower relative to how fast the problem spreads...
I don't think "this is cheap crap" and "you can't tell... because you can forget what cheap crap looks like" works form a logic perspective.
It's kinda sad that youtubers across the board were impressed with various applications of AI (art, animation, writing etc), until the moment it touched their livelihood.
“It’s only ok until it happens to me”
@@kneeofjustice9619 A lot of people aren't truly scared of the metaphorical guillotine until their neck is being forced into the chopping block. It's optimism bias plus short-sightedness combined.
Aint human mature a beautiful thing. Only job it wont take is top percent of politicians because theyre the only ones with the power to say no
@@xbigbooshx4643 that really how the whole issue is. A lot of people have optimism bias and lot have pessimism bias.
Everyone loves to preach "progress" until "progress" takes away from them.
AI has always been a scary concept for me. And what’s even scarier is future generations 50 years from now will think AI is completely normal and don’t have much to worry about. Sort of like how we think of the internet today.
Doubt it. It will encroach on every job and ruin people's livelihoods. If it sees another decade of use, it'll either be extremely limited or we'll be living in hell.
_"A computer can never be held accountable - therefore a computer must never make a management decision."_
- IBM Presentation, c. 1979.
That's a crazy but a true concern
ai is the future, people trying to stop it are actively holding humanity back from reaching its full potential
@@tonypringles2285that full potential is gonna kill us.
I wonder what his thoughts are on those who do AI presidents and make a full blown series out of it, it’s not just tier list, or whatever, it’s like they actually go on adventures in the writing is actually really good
Can't wait for the AI youtube unboxing videos
I like obvious AI, but not deceptive AI. A clear example of a good one is Neuro-sama. She is some guys coding project, but she has a blatantly robotic voice and is aware that she is a program on someone's computer and references it on many occasions.
I went into this video hoping it wasn't about her. Shes like the one AI that the vtuber community likes lol.
@CJZSS23 Yeah, I thought the same thing, too. I was hoping it was just gonna be Charlie stumbling on a clip of hers during a stream
It's interesting that you're referring to an AI program as a "she."
@@KunoCallsunWell why not, we refer to fictional characters using he/she/they pronound
because clearly Vedal's objective is not to make money, just to improve and create content with Neuro in a healty way, not to mention that at this point he himself creates content without it being his objective from the beginning lol
got out of my depression because i finally found something i want to do in life, graphic design. with how advanced ai has gotten in just 2 years im fucking terrified that my job is going to be taken away from me or outsourced to softwares.
To be more specific, I fear that the work from free lance with individual customers and small businesses will, but not entirely, wain. I am confident that bigger more professional companies will still hire teams of designers to perfect advertisement or brands. The use of AI will then be down to the individual designer under employment if to or not be used for what ever reason (IE shifting work load to bring forward deadlines more efficiently, creating texture, general shape etc.)
While work will be much faster and easier, finding the work will not be and be more competitive It being an already over saturated market,
(sorry for the profanity in my first paragraph, I just finished a barbell set in the gym and wasn't articulating my thoughts properly.)
Well that’s not gonna hit only us graphic designers. It’s going to shit every job
Owned!
Yeah I get you man, I will finally get my first job in graphic design after 2 years of internship just to be hit with this AI shit. Now, I'll probably have to consider changing my career, cause I'm certain that at least 80% of graphic designers, illustrators and artists will have no job after the AI really takes over.
At least I'm not that passionate about it anymore (thanks burnouts and depression).
Since you have passion for the field, at least try it and have a plan B just in case :)
Good luck !
Well you can still do graphic design as a hobby, but good luck trying to make a profit off of it.
they’re gonna end up taking all of our jobs
People predicted AI will be superhuman at 2021. I think it was slower than expected.
Crazy? I was crazy once they locked me in a room, a rubber room
The scary thing is that this is the worse AI will ever be
It's getting better and better everyday
Well, if Kwebbelkop isn't going to lift another finger to evolve their AI then this is truly Kwebbelkop end game as it is - how long til he gets bored and the content feels soulless even to Kwebbelkop? I have many questions like that. Currently I'm wondering if AI ever gets anxiety about it's cringe moments. It would make a great plot for a redemption arc in an AI plotline to triumphantly embrace their cringe.
We're not sure of that. AI training on itself and creating inbred models is a huge issue, there are no good ways to detect AI to prevent that, and the Internet is getting absolutely flooded with AI right now. On top of that, add potential copyright laws preventing AI from being trained on the majority of the content it needs to even be functional. Notice how the latest GPT model is lobotomized compared to the previous one.
Sam Altman and his cronies WANT you to think it's the worse it will ever be. Might not. Keep a healthy dose of skepticism.
I mean, this won't be the worst but yeah, it certainly won't get worse on a grand scale unless something major occurs that I couldn't possibly foresee as an average person.
"AI can never do this" The many fearful say to themselves but no one should be speaking so foolishly, any who say a phrase alike are heavily underestimating the true capacity of artificial connectomes.
@@plebmcpleb5761 No less "inbred" than accidentally using bad quality art made by humans, what is wanted will still be desired and so made. Quality will be evolutionary nevertheless.
AI has the potential to be extremely valuable in the context of science, medicine, and engineering, but when it comes to creative fields like art, cinema, and content creation, there needs to be some sort of line drawn in the sand that AI can't be allowed to cross
EDIT: Yes, I realize that AI can be a tool that real artists can use, no different than a paintbrush or camera. My problem is with people who use AI as a cheaper substitute for hiring actual artists, writers, or creators. I mean, that's one of the reasons that writers and actors in Hollywood are currently on strike!
Totally agree
Totally other way round lmao
@@minsharminni3177Nope AI that tells you not to infringe law. What treatments/ doctors you need to see instantly or quickly with benefits that is good. But ai generation on replacing others with patterns you TOOK from others without TRULY ASKING IF THEY COMPLETEKY AGREE OR NOT FOR SURE. DIREEEEE EVILLL OMG LIEING PEOPLE LIKE YOI NEED TO BR SLAPPED SO HATDDDD
I think there will be eventually, it's mass production in hopes of a giant profit. hmmm
@@minsharminni3177what, your brain?
this whole thing reminds me of the professor story in pokemon scarlet/violet and its so unsettling
my light flickering literally 1 minute before your lights flicker
Vinny Constantly makes the joke that one day his personality, voice, and play style will be made into an ai and his content will never end.
I don’t know who yer daffy pals are.
Who is Vinny
@@dr.markus-level3researcherfr
The fuck's Vinny?
@@dr.markus-level3researcher think they're talking about Vinesauce Vinny
I still can't over the time he made an AI VTuber of someone who was supposed to be a co-owner of a collab channel he was on, and all without that person's permission.
Really, this was going to happen whether we knew it or not.
So much worse is coming, people that cared about art theft and RUclips beef will seem comical in a few years.
Yeah, when I saw his name pop up, that instance came to my mind as well. So I wasn't surprised he's all gung-ho for ai.
Crazy? I was crazy once.
bro plz tell me where you got that perfect gray paint in the room,,,comany who made it and exact color PLZZZZZ ive been through 12 different shades of gray and they all come out too blue or green
PLZ PLZ
Absolutely crazy to think kids will open history books in 50 years and see kwebblekop for being the first major AI content creator
Underrated
He isn't though. Been going on for years already.
i agree that it’s crazy to think that, because he isn’t lol
lmao no, they won't because he isn't.
All while learning from an AI teacher lol.
I'm actually surprised that Neuro-sama isn't mentioned in discussions like these, the actually decently popular AI VTuber.
Kinda same, but not a lot of people know of her and she's a unique case cause she's far more human than most people.
Wasn’t that thing the same one that said the holocaust wasn’t real?
@@sunsetgames2622 a while back, yes
I think that Neuro is a unique case because 1) the audience knows upfront that they’re watching an AI (no deception) and 2) the creator of the AI (Vedal) is active during some streams and there’s always a sort of Victor and the Monster dynamic between the two. TL;DR Neuro isn’t actually replacing anyone like Kwebbelkop is.
@@sunsetgames2622she was programmed to make denials of statements by her chat that she didn't understand to avoid being tricked into saying anything suspect, her canned response 'I don't believe that happened'. Once people noticed it was easy to exploit and Vedal has tried to work around this. Hopefully she won't be racist anymore.
This seems to be what the future will look like as the tech becomes more accessible. Al Pacino did that movie S1mone and black mirror had that episode in season 5. Actors, singers, influencers and why not RUclipsrs.
Neuro Sama is an AI that actually plays games. You don't need a human to do the gameplay if you program it well enough.
Doesn't she also play different kinds of games as well?
the thing there is that it being AI is part of the brand, and its niche. If AI gameplay could replace humans in terms of entertainment value, esports would be all AIs going at each other.
So, nothing really that new if someone still needs to program it for you. A lot easier I assume, still just a bot.
Neuro is kind of unique, because she's programmed to be largely self-aware, and likes to troll her creator.
@@dziewiaty You "Teach" the AI by feeding them youtube videos,
It's why when the AI makes a nether portal they sometimes step back, look at it, circle their cursor, and then jump in, because tutorial videos do that while explaining the nether portal.
It's also why she aggros Vedal when he plays because it's recalling PvP tutorials.
So, it's "Learning" from patterns and repetition, it's not just being programmed like a TAS or a bot.
"deceptive bloat on platforms" amen. Been saying this from the beginning. Pretty soon we're gonna need AI blockers like we have Ad blockers. It's going to create underground market demand for real artists that can actually delivery pro human, high quality, contributions that have a message behind them. I never give my $2 to a coffee vending machine if there's a barista nearby
I will give my 2$ to a coffee vending machine if I have to wait for 15 more minutes on barista nearby
@@addenanda philistine
@@addenanda this is why no matter what. Ai will dominate, because the greater public is not affected
Butlerian Jihad
when you search up painters you literally see AI art work trying to replicate their style, its crazy the AI art always looks like dogshit too its impossible for it to produce good art
This is definitely a slippery slope
This is the worst it will ever be.
The genie is out of the bottle.
I swear, 10 years ago I never invisioned a world where AI and robots take over our arts and entertainment while we humans are left to wage our lives away at minimum wage menial tasks to keep us occupied. The WORST timeline.
The world is bad and people are bad everyone sucks everything is so sad and bad. Nobody's a Chad.
This reminds me of how I felt when AI art kicked off. Immediately my commission requests dropped by 80% and in the following weeks no one came to me for commissions anymore. The future sure is great, I say from my tent in the woods. I don't miss living in a house working my dream job at all.
Well… how many commissions would you normally get? Were you already successful enough to make a living off of art?
Sorry the future sucks. :/
People buy AI art now due to it being trendy. However, it's the emotion of the artist that is put into their art that touches people's emotions. That connection won't happen with AI art. Use your frustration to make the best art ever & there will come a day when the public shares the feelings you have today & your art will be what they want. (I hope that made sense. Lol.)
Be grateful that you lived in the Artist's Age at all. There have never been more artists per capita than right now. The gravy train had to end sometime.
It sucks because it could have been a tool for you, a way to use your own backlog of art to make cheap mock ups, the closest you would have to passive income ad an artist that lets people toy with your style before committing to a full commision, they pay however much, get an ai art piece
but there's only so much the bot can do, its a taste test of your style for people on the fence, a way to experiment with their idea before they go for a full commission so they arent taking up lots of time from you, people who wouldnt commisiom you because of the cost, or dont know what they want, have no references, or arent sure about your style can poke the bot and you get paid, the bigger and more diverse your backlog the more versatile it is, but its just your art feeding it.
You might lose out on some comissions, but you would surely get a decent chunk of people using the ai. It isnt replacing your work its supplementing it, giving people who cant afford a commission a way to buy art from you, people who dont know what they want a chance to experiment before they start taking up your time, people without references a way to make a quick and simple one to show you so they can explain things better, and people who arent sure your style is for them a way to experiment with it before committing to it.
You could even collab with other artists and mix your samples into temporary bots that draw from different styles which would be cool
but regulating that would be a nightmare
man just when I thought my chances couldnt get slimmer
"people dont want to watch an AI"
Vtubers been doing that for awhile now, Nuero-Sama
i genuinely think that artists, video makers and game developers need to establish an anti-AI copyright set up. if it is discovered that you are abusing content spaces in order to get into this, they should be eviscerated financially in order to establish precedence.
I sincerely hope that becomes the case soon so that those of us who want nothing to do with AI can finally have some peace.
Unfortunately it's evolving so fast that I doubt anyone could keep up
We're trying, but please tell the suits in office to listen
Yup. Time to unionise
And how do you propose these people prove that happened?
Little do we know, Charlie has been an AI for years and is just trying to throw us off his trail
This has to be the start of some sort of uprising.
Trying to imagine AI replicating Charlie's quick and harsh wit and wondering if it would turn into a paragraph of offensive nonsense or the weirdest metaphors ever.
I hate that people are putting so much effort into making AI do things that we do for fun, while also messing with livelihoods of artists, voice actors, writers, and others I don't even know about.
I like content made by humans with passion, not AI made to imitate or steal with a prompt.
Idk, I like watching the AI presidents play UNO
@akiramakara2062
I like watching them play Risk, The Game of Life, Golf with your friends.
Generally I would agree as art is close to my heart. But I doubt in larger scale people care about human made work with passion. They care about content they can consume. And opportunities.
Then you are in the minority
Eh we could have developed ai for this stuff later my problem with current ai is that it's focusing on art and voice acting too much why can't we make ai useful in progressing man kind?
0:07 CrAZy!?!!!? I was crazy one, they put in a room… a rubber room… a rubber room with rats… the rats made me crazy…
When the lights flickered my internet went out
5:52 its improving technology and showing off its capabilities
Neuro-sama has been around almost for a year with 400k followers on Twitch, she's the biggest AI streamer and one of the top indies of the vtuber world, so its no surprise
The difference is that Neuro isn’t really replacing human vtubers, her entertainment comes specifically from the fact that she’s an AI. Kwebbelkop is using AI to make the same sort of content as everyone else, while Neuro is more of her own separate niche.
I was looking for a neuro sama comment lol
@@kyuubi_hime same here
@@derpymule7977 and also the banter bewteen vedal
That’s because she is kinda niche. Once ai content creators become more common, people will get fatigued.
The thing that bothers me about this most is that I just spent almost a whole week working on one video (still not even done and not posted yet) doing the research, writing the script, recording, and then editing. If you can do it all in minutes, it allows constant videos to be pumped out and over saturates the market with the same type of content, making it difficult for people to find engaging content that people work hard on.
The thing is, the biggest RUclipsrs will benefit massively from using AI compared to smaller RUclipsrs. If a small youtuber posts an AI video, it won’t make as many views or even attention.
People know quality and originality when they see it. Just keep doing you and have fun doing it. In the end, that’s all you can really ask of yourself anyway.
@@jakehoner1751 while I do agree with you, when you’re wanting to make it a career and provide for your family, you may have to sacrifice some aspect of fun to compensate for the RUclips game. Whether it be clickbait titles, thumbnails, etc. In my personal opinion, the fun gets taken away when you have to sacrifice your creativity to appeal to the RUclips audience, but maybe that’s just how it is and I have to accept it for what it is. Any thoughts on this?
@@jakehoner1751 I completely agree! I love spending the time and effort that I do on my videos and learning how to make them better. I just think the introduction of an AI like this just makes it significantly more difficult for viewers to find content they enjoy and for small youtubers to reach an audience since the market will likely become over saturated with low effort AI videos. Hopefully that doesn’t become the case, but I agree that making the videos should still be for the love of it rather than for the sake of making content if you’re not trying to make a career of it!
While i agree with your sentiment, i believe in the silver lining of word-of-mouth being a thing again. We rely too much on search engines.
this is going to be a historical video in the future, learning history in the future with youtube existing will be interesting
Replicating a personality and have consciousness with a personality are two very different things.
Yep, I’ve been trying to voice my concerns about things like this for a while but I get hit with the “you’re all doom and gloom”, when in reality these are things we seriously need to be discussing. To focus on the AI creator aspect with RUclips needs to put guidelines in place that these “creators “ need to very clearly state they are AI or alternatively ban it from the platform all together and have a separate platform for that type of content. Guess we can cross aliens and AI off our 2023 bingo cards now at least
The world is bad and people are bad everyone sucks everything is so sad and bad. Nobody's a Chad.
i think this ai thing is another piece of the pie all the other pieces are the same or worse and a lot of people are ignorant to it all.
because you are all doom and gloom, just because ai content exists it does not mean people will just abandon all human content, i do agree we should have a thing that notifies you if you are watching human or ai content but its not like people will just watch ai content and not watch human content, most people watch more than one creator so people will see ai content, enjoy it, and then probably go off and watch something else
I always thought it would be the other way around, where AI would never be able to take over entertainment because human emotions such as laughter, sadness, anger and suspense are not logical, and that things like science and math would be the first ones to be fully automated because everything is very logical.
New science isnt available online for the AI to learn from.
The ai is doing a terrible job in the shown videos though
It's almost as if Detroit become will become reality
turns out humans are not as special as we thought, who would've thought?
@@randomvideoboy1yeah, it's funny how people still think laughter is magical. The AI does not have to attain some magic and become human. humans must realize there is nothing special about our brains.
First bitmoji you talk about sounds like whisp
Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room, with rubber rats. And rats, they make me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once...
Can’t believe charlie was right about this, we shouldn’t have doubted him guys (I have not watched the video yet)
bruh -_-
💀
Don’t translate! 😤
နာရီအနည်းငယ်အတွင်း သင့်နှလုံးခုန်ရပ်သွားလိမ့်မည်။ ၎င်းကိုတားဆီးရန် တစ်ခုတည်းသောနည်းလမ်းမှာ ကျွန်ုပ်၏ချန်နယ်သို့ စာရင်းသွင်းရန်ဖြစ်သည်။
た……..
His comment section is summed up well here
😂😂
It's like he isn't even aware of how he became the size he is. Dude created a whole community with his content and formed a fan base he could connect with. Now people are mad since you can't connect with a machine and he doesn't understand.
this guys career died a long time ago. He avgs 50k views as a human. This is his only option granted, for the sake of his reputation, but I don't think he will care after getting that paycheck
Oh he understands. But you have to understand that if he wants to make an ai contentl then why make a new channel when he already has one with million of subs he isn't using. Its still better to keep 1% of a million subscriber base then to start new
@@TomatoffelOr he could learn to branch out and do the things he wants to as a content creator instead of kill his fanbase by relying an monotonous automation.
@@Mrhellslayerz wierd you want him to branch out and do what he wants, but when he does that you criticise him for alienating his viewerbase xD
@@Tomatoffel Yeah, I see the irony. Does that make it less true though?