ULEZ - London Air Quality Test 6 Months On | Temtop Test Part 3
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 мар 2024
- Six months on from the expansion of ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zone) to cover the whole of London, in August 2023 and the London Mayor still hasn't released impact data to prove that it's improved the air quality in the expanded zones. And it won't be released until after the elections in May 2024. However, I shot two videos last year, taking an ELITECH Temptop air quality meter around London, covering firstly the previous ULEZ zone in part 1 and the proposed area of expansion in Part 2. This means I can directly compare my findings today, six months on from the expansion to the data I had before, to see if there has been any improvement in air quality. This is what I do in this video. And the results may surprise you - they certainly astonished me!
Test recorded Tuesday 5 March 2024
Here is Part 1 • ULEZ Air Quality Pt1: ...
Here is Part 2 • ULEZ Air Quality Pt2: ...
Everything you need to know about ULEZ browncarguy.com/2024/02/08/ul...
Here are the other videos I've done on ULEZ
• ULEZ London
Anti ULEZ Facebook groups
/ 423124092367973
/ stoptheulez
Get my debut novel (perfect for petrolhead bookworms) 'The ULEZ Files' here amzn.eu/d/jhADkOt
Please subscribe/follow
RUclips: ruclips.net/user/browncarguy?s...
And follow all my channels linktr.ee/browncarguy
If you enjoy my content, there are really easy ways to show your support
Channel membership: ruclips.net/user/browncarguy/join
Buy me a Coffee! ko-fi.com/browncarguy
Patreon - / browncarguy
🙏🏽☺️
Big Thanks to
CraftLab (www.CraftLab.my)
Design5IT
Tom Conway-Gordon ( tconwaygordon)
Marc Waddell ( elocutus55)
Shaheer Hakki
Reza Adil ( Alizarde.Cigars)
Mohammed Qasim (wehms.com)
Salman Hussain ( szhus13)
TheCaffeineGTShop (caffeinegt.com)
Muhammad Ali Haji ( behindthewheel.life)
Please subscribe to my channel for more videos like this - and make sure you hit the bell icon to switch on notifications.
---------------------------
Brown Car Guy
#ULEZ #ULEZExpansion #London #Ultralowemissionzone #ULEZLondon #cars #carblogger #carjournalism #motoring #automotive #ulez #ultralowemissionzone #london #londonmayor #sadiqkhan #stopulezexpansion #ulezexpanding #temtop #elitech #airpollution #toxicairpollution #toxicair #waronmotorists #waroncars @elitech_uk 
Авто/Мото
For the cost of just one ulez camera you could plant several thousand trees that last a minimum of 50 years.
The benefits of native woods and trees are well understood. They lock up carbon reduce pollution and flooding and support people, wildlife and farming.
Trees Reduce Air Pollution absorb and break down most of the major air pollutants including ground-level ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide.
But as we all know Ulez is not about air quality, It was deigned to raise money not clean the air!
But the government want that green/brown land to build new high rise flats and houses for the illegals eco migrants!
They need people like you on the climate agenda board. Just plant trees. But then how do you monetise à population with that?
The root cause of all world problems is profits and greed.
Ho no! You can't plant more trees, that's going to interfere with my 5G signal when they try to fry my brain so I can get me out of this dystopian nightmare.
@@TotalEquilibrium1My thoughts exactly. Trees don't line your pockets !
But that nice Mr Gates just chopped 1000s if not 1,000,000 down to save us all with a wind farm.
0.04 0.02 we are all surviving on 0.02%.
It doesn't matter if the reading goes up, the dirty air has been paid for so now it's safe.
🤣🤣🤣
Just like the carbon emissions offset scams
😂😂😂
This guy has a beak and reminds me of an Angry Bird 🐦
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Well there’s a surprise ! No wonder our Mayor Of London doesn’t want figures released before the Mayoral election ! Please vote Susan Hall and let’s get khan out of London 👍🙏🏻❤️ Great update video BCG ! Top Man 🙏🏻
if you vote for Susan hall she will only cancel ULEZ in outer London, Howard Cox will kill off the whole scheme for everyone. Inner London to. End this nightmare for everyone vote for Howard Cox. if inner London get to keep ULEZ it will be in every major city in a few years time, if it is cancelled altogether it may not succeed elsewhere.
She should make the readings public knowledge and part of her battle. I fear it may be uphill given the possible problems with the system we use, if you get my drift.
You do understand Boris originally was responsible for ulez. Khan just implemented it we don't need anymore Tories in government.
Thank you for exposing this scam. Any decent project manager will tell you that you must monitor and evaluate your project and then assess its impact. We've had the pain... now where's the gain? A lot of us have had to sell our older vehicles (at a considerable loss), and can't afford euro 6 replacement replacement
The mayor of London can hide the real figures all he likes. Most Londoners are going to vote him out of office anyway. So Mr Sadiq Khan, start packing your bags.
Send this video to members of The London Assembly and demand they confront the weasel with them while live on camera.
It would be interesting to see Khan try and wriggle his way out of this one.
I have just done this. I sent the link to the nine Conservative London Assembly Members listed.
he'll just use he goverment training to A) Just ignore which he is a master of B) Answer the question with another completly different question. The main trouble with anyone in office is, they can not be wrong EVER, I would have more respect for anyone to say you know what I was wrong and this is what im going to do to make it better........
Brilliant mate and believe me I'm on your side and we all know that Ulez is a con but we the people need to monitor the air quality 24 7 and if your basic experiment is proven to be right Khan should be brought to justice and delt with!
what if its coming from the skie too?
Why does the media not ask how many lives have been saved by the central and North/South Circular ULEZ. This data should already be available.
When the ONS was asked How many people have died from pollution caused health issues and also stated on their death Cert the numbers were 1 !!!!!! yes 1 . Its just a money grabbing tax !! Nothing more !!
How? No one can ever know how many lives have been saved. Such data can never be deduced , it's all a speculation .
Rubbish It is what was put on the death certificate IE Cause of death . ULEZ is just a cash cow and tax !!! There is nothing wrong with the air quality in outer or inner London @@July-A7
@@July-A7 I agree. So we have been mis sold on ULEZ lives saved.
TfL won’t publish the data. They’ve collated it but won’t share it. Probably because the results don’t share Khan’s political narrative.
Peter Fortune (Con) questioned Khan about this and all he got in return was a personal insult.
Ain’t Democracy wonderful?
When is the protest in London to get rid of Sadiq Khant? Mid March im hearing. Scrap ULEZ 😂😅
but ulez is a tory idea
@@stevecoppin6396They seem to want to avoid such facts around these parts. Yet another for the people video, or the same hard-right BS?
What a load of wast of money the major has done. I bet he fudged the numbers to make his efforts look good. Thanks for taking the time to see real life numbers, we need to vote this major out
Well he's getting the money back from the people paying for ULEZ scam
The major? What, off of Fawlty Towers?🤣
Major new report shows that harmful pollution emissions have reduced by 26 per cent within the expanded ULEZ area - compared with what they would have been without the ULEZ coming into force.
·
Report shows that the ULEZ has reduced harmful pollution levels in central London by nearly half compared to what they would have been without the ULEZ.
·
In inner London, pollution levels are 21 per cent lower than they would have been without the ULEZ
khan has already been proven to have lied
@@richy69ify not so
Wallets and bank accounts are much cleaner
HAHA
Your AQI comparison is very worthwhile although the Mayor will not want this discussed before the election. Remember he dismissed your findings on the Underground as just harmless dust!!!!! 🙈🙉🙊
Surely a newspaper could put an information request in for this data and publish it for us!
Our government is owned by the Globalists elites and so is the mainstream media.
You can't get a fag-paper between Labour and the Tories these days.
Well now, there's a surprise!! Not.
Thanks for putting the effort in to make the video.
It’s a shame your Data doesn’t mean anything to Sadiq Kahn
Keep up the Great work 😀
It wouldn't make any difference , Kahn only understands evidence that suits his agenda !
Random sampling by a person who doesn't understand statistical sampling. Guy's a ignoramus.
Official particulates and NOx level in London have fallen since ulez
The mayor probably realises by now that the data shows no improvement to air quality since the introduction of the expanded ULEZ. In desperate attempt to justify this charge, TfL have now rolled out 20mph speed limits in order to increase pollution levels under the pretence of improving road safety. A very cunning plan indeed Baldrick!
If you reduse the speed limit it surely keeps traffic in the area longer and will therefore make the pollution higher ...no
Wouldn't they be trying to reduce pollution to justify the ulez and not the other way round 😅
@@sandramartin5809nonsense
@@sandramartin5809 That's hard to quantify without scientific testing.
Sure, driving slower keeps the vehicle in the area longer but a slower moving vehicle requires less engine power to maintain that speed so less fuel burnt per hour. A faster moving vehicle needs to burn more fuel at any given point to maintain that speed.
Miles per gallon and gallons burnt per hours don't always translate into each other very well.
Petrol / Diesel Cars are designed and geared to be most efficient between 35 and 50 mph, so driving slower actually uses more fuel and creates more emissions to get from a to b...
So your meter readings are basically ALL still saying the air quality index is in the 'GOOD' range.
So ULEZ is a solution to a problem that simply doesn't exist 😂😂😂
Well indeed!
It's a cash cow
Good video BCG, everything is being ignored and hidden under the carpet.
It'd be interesting to drive out into the countryside well away from traffic of any kind and take some readings there to compare with the urban readings and to see how real fresh air registers on your gadgets.
Thanks for the update, BCG 🙏
...The corporate media are like a 'fast food' version of information, with rigid narrative control. I really appreciate these videos 🙏✌️🤘😎
Flow of traffic, the way drivers drive and the amount of cars being directed through the same mapped streets( yes rich people pay Google to not put there roads on there maps….. I saved an hour one Friday after work ignoring my sat nav driving through empty roads.
Fining people doesn’t change a thing
Great work bro….. keep it up
Very informative! Thank you.
Brilliant.
PM 2.5 & PM10 can vary by 30% depending on atmospheric conditions, you would need to do the same tests more frequently over a longer time period for a more accurate result, that said ULEZ has nothing to do with CO, PM2.5 or PM10 reduction.
It's all about NOx emmisions. Euro 6 petrol engines vs EU4 (and a lot of EU3 vehicles) Is only around a 20% reduction, (some EU3 petrols emit less NOx than an EU6 diesel). Pre EU3 vehicles fail on emmisions not because they are worse, they fail because NOx was not tested on its own before 2000.
yeah but who cares about accuracy and details. Let's all just get angry....SMH
For diesel though, which is the biggest generator of NOx emissions, the EU6 standard reduces NOx limits by 84% over EU3 which is a much more significant reduction. The issue with NOx and diesel is that unfortunately most manufacturers ran their EU5 engines in a way that protected the DPF by running hotter with 40-50x more NOx emitted as a result than the EU5 standard allowed... So the really bad NOx issue was always transitory with EU5, and I suspect has also dropped significantly with EU6. Of course by TfL's own figures, by the time ULEZ was expanded more than 80% of people had naturally upgrade to EU6 compliant cars so the useful impact of ULEZ on NOx can only be limited anyway.
As for variability of BCG's tests, the real takeaway is that the AQI was good before and is still good now, so very little appears to have changed. Not many people would approve of a scheme that turned good air quality to well, still good air quality...
Plus day of the week, calibration, the same lorry driving past... 6:22
@@Discovery_Dad this sort of backs up the fact the biggest drop in NOx was pre 2020.
Another nicely put together video.Well it's obvious what ulez is about and it's not clean air.🐻🐵☺️👍
Thanks 👍
Particulates in the air mainly come from tyres and brakes, so the ULEZ’s won’t have any real effect in reducing these airborne particles! Great video, thanks. Best wishes from the French Alps, Colin.
Edit: I am wrong.
A significant proportion come from brakes and tyres, but the majority come from Diesel engine emissions
@@incandescentwithrage No it doesn’t! Here’s an extract from the latest data on the gov.uk website:
Exhaust emissions have decreased markedly from 1996 to 2022 due to stricter emissions standards (decreased by 93 per cent for both PM2.5 and PM10). However, non-exhaust emissions (brake, tyre and road wear) have increased by 15 per cent for PM2.5 and increased by 14 per cent for PM10 between 1996 and 2022, as the overall number of kilometres travelled by vehicles each year in the UK has increased over this period. This means that most PM emissions from road transport derive from non-exhaust emissions, which alone contributed 15 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions and contributed 14 per cent of total PM10 emissions in 2022.
www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-particulate-matter-pm10-and-pm25#:~:text=Road%20transport%20continues%20to%20be,%2C%20tyre%20and%20road%20wear).
@@skisavoie Thanks for correcting me.
I didn't realise that PM from exhausts had fallen so dramatically.
Original link didn't work for me, so I cleaned it up in case anyone else wants to read it
www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-particulate-matter-pm10-and-pm25
Such a good idea to prove a point! More people should do this around London
so as we all said at the time it has nothing to do with air quality, but all about raising tax for tfl, and the mayor getting cameras installed so he can charge EVERY vehicle pay per mile and control when and where you can drive
How do you know this is the case. Everything is screwy, but dont plug an idea that may not exist. If you believe in a lie, it could well become true!
@@paxford2 How do you know that it isn't going to be the case down the line 🤔
Excellent work you've done there, really shows what it's all about. Just purchased your book, £10 on Amazon and looking forward to reading it 👍 keep up the good fight my man 💪
Awesome, thank you! 🙏🏽🤩 Hope you enjoy it. Leave a review on Amazon if you do 😉
Certainly will sir 👍 I'm sure I'll like it and again, some very informative videos and information you have provided, priceless 💯
It’s a thoroughly enjoyable read
What a fantastic job, thanks for taking the time to do this. Over to you Sadiq.................
Thank you for a great informative video BCG
Glad you enjoyed it
Excellent!!!!
Brilliant video
I wish you had covered more areas
Like south and east London to get a better overall idea
Ulez just a big con
Hopefully he will be gone in 2 months
Thanks. I just wanted to compare directly - like-for-like - with some of the locations I did in my previous video. Fingers crossed by the way! 😉
One and a half year after the introduction of the Clear Air Zone in Birmingham, I have done the same test and compared the statistics from the official government sites, the result was the same, there was no difference in the air quality between the Clear Air Zone and the surrounding areas. I have asked the question what happened to the revenue earned from the charges, how come the Air quality is not changed at all. The simple answer was that the wind is blowing bad Air from the surrounding areas into the city centre. I couldn't believe this.
What a corrupt answer from a corrupt government
Thank you Sir for your honest work👍
Thank you for taking the time to provide these conclusive readings.
The creator himself is pretty careful to state that these are not conclusive readings.
Good man
Great Work!👍
Great work....ive been wondering when a government dept, National Leading Science organisation would give figures.....oh wait its down to you again.....What cannot speak cannot LIE......fair play good sir
Keep up the good work
Shiek top work mate .
Thanks for this update, but it would be good to do this again at the same time of year as last time.
Fantastic work 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Keep it up
Nice work
Excellent work, keep it up
Excellent idea mate 👍
Good work! 🌸
Keep on keeping on BCG! Great work! 🙂
I really appreciate what you're doing here and the effort you've gone to. Air quality is significantly impacted by weather and movement of air masses and it wouldn't be right to draw any conclusions from readings made from a single day - or even a week. The Mayor of London's office should be releasing data, but I expect they're waiting to be able to make a year-on-year comparison.
Many Many Thanks to you Brown Car Guy. Invaluable info
Well done BCG, im sure khan has got these figures but wont release them because it proves him wrong.
Thanks for putting all the effort in.
You should be invited on GB News to put this out nationwide.
Thank you for your time and effort in making these videos. BTW, love your BMW.
🙏🏽☺️
Great vid - Khan would say you were standing amongst a load of paying polluting cars...yeh, thats it, sheer coincidence but there you have it. Then he would drop the mike...
Brilliant video, thanks for the updates, these videos are priceless.
Kind request: please return the jingle at the start of the videos, it makes my day when I hear it. 😁
Doh! Everyone keeps telling me to get rid of the intro at the beginning! 😂
Good video👍🏼
Meeting Susan Hall tonight. If she hasn’t seen it already will bring this video to her attention
🙏🏽☺️
Great stuff - Thank you! 👏👏👏
Oh dear!
@@stevejones2310 It was good with cheese & wine!
Drive out into rural Buckinghamshire, find open fields where free from obvious emissions and take your readings. Compare those readings to those obtained on North Circular Road next to Brent Council monitoring station.
I think you missed the point: ULEZ has not led to a reduction in air pollution, it’s simply been another revenue generator for the local authority.
Why take readings in a field in Buckinghamshire when that would be completely irrelevant and not in the equation. The area and the comparisons he is, showing is in London places that he, studied before. The reason given for the charge is to improve air IN LONDON and it clearly shows that this excuse is not at all valid. It's a big lie and he proves that clearly therefore their is no reason nor excuse to justify extorting money from people for a benefit that doesn't exist. I ve spelled this out to you because you are obviously very thick and stupid.
Air quality has more to do with air movement, than number of cars. Or at least when it comes to measuring it. Air quality is worse on hot, dry windless days. Also, half the air pollution comes from vehicles. The rest comes from buildings. All that heating kicking out carbon monoxide ( CO ), which quickly turns into CO2. In my tests around the lockdown, the week before, with 80,000 cars passing by, air quality was similar to what you are finding ( not much at all ). The week later, lockdown, no cars, but hot dry windless weather and air quality was far, far worse in the city centre ( Leeds ). If ever we have a hot dry, windless day, go have a check. Your premise is right tho, Ulez is nowt to do with air quality, else you would be measuring a lowering of pollution levels. What we both have found is there is no pollution to talk about in the first place. Keep going. Tho I suspect no one will ever listen to reason, data and findings. That would spoil their opportunity to make money from the motorist
Excellent
Yes I've finally re-found your channel.
It had disappeared from my subscribed list and videos in the history were gone as well.
I have re-subscribed.
Great to hear. But it's concerning that it had disappeared even after you had subscribed. How odd!
@@BrownCarGuyhonestly, I've heard it's happened to other people on other channels so it doesn't surprise me that it would happen to me eventually.
But it's fine I'll just have to make sure I'm subscribed to the people I watch every few weeks.
@@harrisonnightingale6600 The key thing is to interact by hitting the Like button and leaving comments, this tells RUclips you like to engage in a channel's content and it should continue to serve it to you. 🙏🏽☺
It's a failure in delivering what was promised, who would've thought that ! Great testing and info 👍🏻
Bimmer looks so clean... quality video...
🙏🏽☺️
Money talks,louder than facts❤😊
What was the weather like last time keep up your good work Buddy 👍
Nicer! 😜 Thanks!
@@BrownCarGuy is that a 323i or 325i
@@SNAFU.. 1989 325i SE browncarguy.com/2024/02/13/my-classic-1989-e30-bmw-325i-se-part-2-2023/
Yep.. This has to be the crucial factor, doesn't it? Wind and rain will likely wash particulates out of the air, I guess. This would mean that results have to be averaged over quite a long time judging by the fairly large variations that you got. Even if whole months are used, it might still be possible for changes in the weather to affect the results.
Gotta say very fair test 👏
It's nice to see someone demonstrating some statistics and going back to back with it, I hope to see further testing as well to prove the clowns in the government wrong.
Thank Mr Brown advert guy! 👍✌️🖖
Sometimes I think the data they originally based the reasons for putting in low emissions zones in place was from outdated data from cities in the 1960's and 1970's when the majority of vehicles ran leaded petrol and diesel engines were a bit more smokey and had zero emissions control.
Good point, they lie about everything nowadays ….see “homogenised temperature data” in cLIEmate change 🤔
Sadiq Khan’s, to reduce pollution by expanding the ULEZ to greater
London is not working.
He doesn’t really care about pollution and air quality and here is
why:
- He has already increased pollution and made London the
slowest moving city in the world, it’s far worse now since he
introduced the LTN’s which have increased pollution on the
main roads because we are forced to use them as there are no
other alternatives, especially during rush hour. The roads are
now grid locked with traffic moving at walking pace and the
fumes are getting denser and not dispersing because of it.
LTN’s need to be reopened as it is causing more damage than
good.
Among all this, the mileage in vehicles has also increased due
to the fact that we are forced to go the long way round to get
to the required destination - all accumulating to even more
emissions being emitted! Bravo Sadiq & team. (How can this
be reducing pollution?!)
- Pedestrians as they walk along these main routes to get to
stations, schools, shops are inhaling far more fumes than
before, you can really notice this. Even drivers inhale more
fumes when we are stuck in stationary traffic. This is really
aggravating and makes no sense!
- Cycle Lanes: Should not be taking up an extra lane of the roads,
large pavements could be divided into two for cyclists.
- The introductions of 20MPH roads are also a big problem
because emission fumes don’t disperse quickly and the air is
getting even more polluted because of the need to drive in
lower gears. (higher revs = more fumes)
Sadiq’s statement: “It is to reduce toxic air pollution” is clearly not
accurate, he has made matters far worse. It is obvious that his
policies are just to clobber the motorist and to generate funds for
TFL. The situation is getting extremely out of hand and something
needs to be done to stop him from ruining our climate even more.
He should resign and Londoners should vote for someone who will
make London a greater and more desirable place to live in. There
needs to be a more logical and strategic plan that is well thought out.
Wouldn't driving an EV be cheaper?
The air looks clean and fresh where you are. And the classic car only serves to improve the scenery
The hot air emanating from the mouth of the mayor Ulez smells of verbal diarreah😂
In the Guardian today they announced à bullcrap study that says that LTNs have been à huge success have a look.
Well done mate this data should be shown to the people who put this thing in place Ha if they dont have this information already, its a money making scheme
So all modern cars must have cheat devices on their emissions. My 53 plate transit could do a return trip to London on 2/3 of a tank of diesel. The van I replaced it with; a 2012 used a whole tank for the same journey. The van I just replaced that with is a 2017 that uses 10 litres of oil per oil change, this means the engine never heats up fully. It's all a fraud as far I can see.
ULEZ was supposed to improve air quality by 1.5%, which frankly is pointless considering the stress it has caused the public, which is more harmful than 1.5% decrease in air quality. It's been designed to for the poor to give up their cars.
Best not to question how efficiently an engine did, does, could and should be. The technology is in place, but people are to look for the answers. Not find them...
Lorries reduce air quality by big amounts. I had to move from where the A1 and M62 crossed because, when there was a holdup several times a day, I had difficulty breathing; the fumes from the slow lorries was overwhelming. I was on the local emergency monitor list at my local surgery. When I moved to an East England village my breathing returned to just into normal, but the damage had been done.
Clever post
I said from the very beginning it was all a "Con Job".
Your data would seem to confirm that (O;
Brilliant video, thank you. I'm sure they'll argue the air temperature and perhaps relative humidity will affect the results. What we can be assured of is it's a money making scam.
You’re a true brit 👍🏼
I got rid of my van of 75k miles plenty of life in her. Ive been stuck without a vehicle for a complete lie. Its BS
Basically the heaviest polluters are planes, trains, lorries and buses. The war on personal cars has been won and every year the standard for tougher emissions ebs away at polluting engines, forcing them off the roads or improvements which shape engine design. Meanwhile, for Super Bowl Sunday, you're allowed to fly in on a private jet using the most harmful way possible. The same with local public transport and the transportation of goods. The motorist is relatively clean, the biggest issue is these other methods which need a massive overhaul - and electric buses or trucks are not cut out to sort the problem because of the mileage and weight to be carried.
That E30 is utterly gorgeous!
@@GandyGamingHD thank you 🙏🏽☺️
@@BrownCarGuy you’re welcome! An E30 touring is an absolute dream for me, hopefully sooner than later! Keep up the excellent work mate!
nice classic BMW 👍
BRO beautiful car, wow
You're our hero my friend; though sadly what little good it can do. They don't want to listen to scientific reason, often anywhere in these days of sanctimonious hyperbole; the death knell of the ICE has been well and truly sounded and with a knee jerk well before it's common sense and orderly phase out. It is always the poorer of us who bear the most relative cost; it is never an issue for the better off. Very nicely made video BTW; I only say since it's my day job. Very professional with perhaps the only lacking in cutaways when you are doing your pieces to camera - such as on the bridge; otherwise, I would say indistinguishable from the 'pro' TV footage I normally edit; and you'd make a very welcome presenter on the box too. Regards.
Very kind of you. Many thanks. By the way, I did car reviews on FOX MENA TV when I was based in Dubai so have done TV work too. ☺️
@@BrownCarGuy I thought you may have done because you look like you have experience; very professional a good style and watchable too. Well done, Steve.👍
@@CUTproductionsLtd 🙏🏽☺️
Never let facts get in the way of "The Message "!
Nice. I like what you’re doing. Your BMW is also very nice. It’s not brown though 🤔
😂
I don't understand why the London mayor would not want to publish the air quality results!! he was SO SURE it would improve his pockets!!! Opps I mean the air quality in London.
Here in Wales we’re six months into the 20mph fiasco, same as ULEZ absolutely no data to show how many lives/serious injuries have been saved thanks to the new limit. I suspect this is because there’s nothing to tell, if there was that would be the first thing you’d shout out loud to justify the speed reduction. It’s also supposed to save the Welsh NHS £92m a year, every year 🤔.
ULEZ, 20mph zones, LTN zones and random one way street restrictions is creating longer & slower journeys for everyone which consequently use more energy. The exact opposite of its anti-pollution intent.
I would think that wind speed and direction would affect the data . i.e imagine a good breeze blowing directly from a major airport just a few miles away , or a traffic jam on the M25 for instance . You show an interesting snap shot , but it's the long term data that is more important IMO. I noticed a great comment below regarding the positive benefit and relative cost of planting more trees 🌿
It’s extremely funny, the official measurement of air quality is up, so, with data like that, major Kan’t has absolutely No Grounds to continue with this ridiculous money grab. We Must! Vote him out!!
Still more than acceptable results. if 50 is the bench mark
😂😂😂 carful Sadiq might ban all cars next to get his figures down. But then again, how will he make ( sorry steel ) his money 😂😂😂
Steal!
@billgoodwin8013 sorry need my glasses 😁
He needs a lot of money to,pay over 100 of his mates on £100K plus a year then himself and all for achieving zero…
A really good informative video which I sort of stumbled on by chance.
I note some people are saying vote for the Conservative candidate to get Kahn out. I'll tell you now that wont achieve anything more than a rename or re brand of ULEZ. Think about it, who first introduced ULEZ? It was brought in before Khan.
Really great to get the follow up on this. ULEZ is a complete lie for the purpose it’s been “accepted”. Good work! Btw I’m really not keen on the new footage, quite jerky.
Nice video, well done. Further proof ULEZ has done nothing to improve local air quality, it’s simply been another revenue generator for the local authority
You need to take weather temp and humidity etc jnto consideration and test daily rather than just a couple of points in time. Keep up the good work.
The only impact it’s had is on the Mayors financial coffers!
I would say that you would or should do the air quality test during similar weather conditions ie wind speed and wind direction. This is very important. Other conditions such as cloud or mist or fog, or even temperature may be important too.
Sadiq Khan and TFL need to be taken to court for knowing causing pollution by design .
Maybe a crowd fund would work
No surprise, LBC and James o'Brian love the ULEZ Bandit.
Good work 🤜🤛👍
nice whip, gramps.