In my opinion it's for viewership. If they put a graphic at the end people would just skip the video to the end just to see the side they picked rather than watching throughout
My god did Buvey seriously say Foden was a better footballer then John Barnes. Please please don't speak on things you clearly have no idea about. Just say I've never seen John Barnes kick a football. And yes John Barnes could dictate play from Central midfield. Just watch any John Barnes game post injury. Went from the best winger in the country to the best midfielder in the country.
Buvey - Shearer only has one PL title Next minute - Rooney and KANE…what a combination I don’t understand why people hold Kane to this god of England status when he is the biggest winner on a scale of only losers.
I swear Rory looks different every week. His hair randomly grows rapidly😂 1 minute he looks rough with short hair and stubble and then a week later he’s got long hair and no beard and looks 14 again. Mad to think he’s about 40
@@nffclaceynah not gonna lie he does have a pretty big bald spot on top. There was a video a while ago when he dropped his head down and you could see how he was covering it
@@Rob07544saka has done more for England in terms of performance and goals/ assists then foden has ever done for the white shirt yet foden was a serious debate in this video, now tell me which one is more overrated out of the two. Muppet
Buvey says Shearer doesn’t get in the team because a lack of trophies and 3 mins late says Saka will never get in because trophies isn’t what matters 😂🙃 swear he’s cartoon character, just there to say stupid things to annoy people. He cannot be seriously there for his actual insight
Buvey shows that Man City fans know nothing about football. Shearer was the best pure number 9 but Kane/Rooney combination as a 9/10 gets them in over shearer but it doesn't negate Shearer was a world class finisher. 96 Golden boot + 2 goals at WC 98 and 2 goals at Euro 2000.
Shearer is an absolute lock in this team. In my opinion there is only one argument that you might use to delude yourself into thinking he isnt and that would be facilitating around a central midfield that is lacking in defensive rigidity, by selecting Rooney to shore up that weakness.
As soon as Rory said Le-Saux over Pearce....that was the final straw in me giving the guy any acknowledgement at all....Honestly that comment is laughable!!! This guy's whole knowledge focuses around most of the Prem era and Chelsea bias only! For someone of his age, he is so narrowminded and ignorant of what is ability and isn't!!!
Title is misleading, this is not an “All-Time XI”. Just a bizarre video idea if you’re going to ignore the one successful side England has had. I understand the desire to include players you’ve seen been Buvey is right, this is just a 1990’s-2020’s best XI
This list has almost no correlation with the national team. This is an English 11 based loosely on the national team. Phil Foden been discussed having done nothing for England & had 1 top level season at Man City who almost gurantee trophies. Meanwhile Raheem Sterling was England best player when they reach Euro final was glossed over. Raheem Sterling contributed alot more then Foden ever has for Man City during there best spells & contributed to more league titles and trophies. Raheem Sterling had similar output as Foden did last season & similarly was viewed as arguably PL player of the year when City beat during 98 point title race where Liverpool lost it by 1. City that season won the domestic treble + won league with 98 points with Sterling as the best player. Foden won 1 trophy during a period where City won 6 titles in 7 years including a current 4-peat. All it took was Phil Foden to have a great season for him to be viewed as Balon D'or level & he must be in an All-time 11. City won a treble year prior with Foden hardly being involved as key player. Fans are such aesthetic merchants. You can't even use the trophy argument against Sterling otherwise it can't be used for Foden. Sterling has 123 goals in the Premier league at 29. Sterling is a much better LW then Phil Foden & winger in general.
you cant say "this XI isn't about england performance" for one player than include a player in strictly for their england performances over way better players lmao
The Shearer disrespect is so stupid man. Kane is lauded as incredible on here and shearer is still miles ahead for PL goals! All for varied opinions as long as there’s still some sense involved
For Buvey's benefit, I tried to put together an XI based on my limited understanding of football history (4-2-2-2): GK: G Banks (the only ENG GK I've ever heard of getting respect from foreign fans, even if it is mostly for that one save!) RB: V Anderson (no real outstanding candidates here TBH. Take your pick from Neville, Madeley, Neal, Walker, TAA, Steven etc) CBs: R Ferdinand & B Moore (think they'd compliment each other's games well with a bit of luck) LB: As Cole (think Rory overrates him, but obv choice.) DCM: D Edwards (what might have been, but was already Ballon d'Or podiumist and best player on league winning teams without that) CM: B Robson (Beckham vs Greece, but every week. Just unlucky with injuries, and maybe picking United over Liverpool) RAM: T Finney (versatile, two-footed, great crosser, passer and dribbler and solid goal scorer. Less selfish than Matthews) LAM: B Charlton (first name on the team sheet. Only Englishman with a Ballon d'Or, WC winners medal and UCL winners medal) CF: K Keegan (hard working star. Did it at home and in Germany. Two time Ballon d'Or winner) S: J Greaves (highest scoring human in the big 5 euro leagues' history*. Peaked early, but peaked highest of all England's great strikers) Obvs many, many players unlucky not to get in. Probably closest to putting Rooney in over Keegan of all those that didn't make it. Picked a formation that avoids having a LW but still relatively weak areas in RB and DM I guess. Might have mentioned the Ballon d'Or too many times during that list! Oh well. * if you believe Messi and CR7 aren't human anyway. Though I've also heard G Muller might be #3, rather than Greaves. I dunno, depends who you ask it seems.
ruclips.net/video/p6jVRGsFxe0/видео.htmlsi=7kNY1GKIwsLlAgfp Henry picked Scholes and played against both. Pep picked Scholes over Lampard and Gerrard ruclips.net/video/1mPknjBxf3o/видео.htmlsi=MM64KaWm84_qmCRO
Players you haven’t seen play is certainly relevant but not when it’s being discussed by RUclipsrs… let football historians who know their stuff argue that, if you’re a fan though just talk about what you’ve seen
Lampard has done more than Gerrard for England. Gerrard has been solely at fault for being knocked out at world cup 2014 and losing to France is 2004, both being silly back passes.
@@WasimAhmed-zp2cmGerrard was in the Euro team of the tournament, I don’t think Lampard has ever done that well for England in a tournament. And Gerrard basically has to sacrifice his best position so they could fit Lampard in
GK: Gordon Banks RB: Kyle Walker CB: Bobby Moore CB: John Terry LB: Ashley Cole CM: Nobby Styles CM: Paul Gascgoine CAM: Bobby Charlton RM: Stanley Matthews LM: Geoff Hurst ST: Jimmy Greaves
Just cos you aint seen michael jordan play or Ali fight or pele or maradona play doesnt mean you dont add them to the all time greats lists. You are better off not having an all time list talk if you aint going to go off legacy.
@@blirt1653 considering everyone spent the entire time he wasn't on the kick off spamming the chat with "where's Hugh??" I'd say he is don't ask questions if you don't want the answers
@@mahkimahkila6396 The Club realise because they've changed the thumbnail? Genuine error from them, genuine comment from me. Only thing strange here is the attitude you demonstrate in your comment lol.
Shearer was a fantastic striker... but Rooney was a better player and Kane is a better finisher. We're talking really high level and you'd be happy with any of them!
Shearer was a better number 9 than Kane. Kane might be a slightly better ball player/passer but in terms of holding up the ball and finishing Shearer is better. And Buvey digging out Shearer for only having 1 league title when Kane has 0 is ironic and moronic😂
@@kailashpatel1706 then you're clueless, everything Shearer could do Kane can do better, whilst also having the capability of playing as a 10. You are clueless my guy, and before you bring stats up for PL remember Shearer played in the 42 game seasons and Kane was on track to beat his record.. I mean Rooney came close whilst playing as a 10/8/anywhere so it shows Shearers stats wasn't impressive
Besides Bobby Charlton...Paul Gascoigne is the best creative midfield has ever had....There is nothing romantic about choosen Paul over Gerald ( different players cos i would out him alongside him) he was a better midfield than Lamps Better for England than Scholes....If Paul Gascoigne went to Man united he would have won everything as well..thats how good he was
Does Buvey know who John Barnes was? The best winger this country has seen and then moved into the middle later on and became a leader and controller of the game. One of the most gifted players this country has ever seen
Best players I've seen. Seaman Walker Ferdinand Terry Cole Beckham Scholes Gerrard Gascoigne (sorry he's going left) Rooney Kane Best England form. Pickford (20) Neville (96) Ferdinand (02) Adams (96) Cole (06) Beckham (02) Gascoigne (96) Rice (20) Sterling (20) Rooney (04) Shearer (96) MF is the hardest. Probably Scholes in 02/04 was better than Gerarrd and Lampard ever were. An argument for Hargreaves in 06 as well but did not play as much. Gone with Rice because he was playing brilliantly in the final vs Italy before he got taken off.
Theiry Henry picked Scholes over Gerrard and Pep Guardiola picked Scholes over both Lampard and Gerrard. ruclips.net/video/1mPknjBxf3o/видео.htmlsi=29ZVgjXRsdLooGUr
Paul Scholes a system player?! But I thought Fergie had no tactics and was just vibes and spent loads of money?!?!?! Nevermind the fact that Scholes played 3 different roles to an elite level throughout his career.
The disrespect for Shearer "Overrated!" Whilst outscoring the likes of Henry, Bergkamp, Cantona. By far, the best pure Premier League striker England has had.
Paul Ince was one of the best midfielders in England. I would say he was better for England than Steven G, Lampard and Scholes. He had a great club career as well. Hence why Roh Keane had Paul Ince in his all time best for Man United team
@@ManchesterCitySupremacy for team balance who would miss out? gascoigne is the most talented player england has ever produced and if hoddle wasnt a stupid to drop him in 98 he would have helped push england even further in the tournament. stiles would be my first sub
@@spankkydelic2501 mathews was a Right outside forward the formation doesnt fit him. 4-3-3 formation he would be in there. But im using the classic 4-4-2 that england have nearly always used post 1950
Can someone explain how Pickford isn't number one equalled bank's clean sheet record in the same amount of games, 2 Finals, One semi and multiple penalties saved in big moments,
Just wish Rory would shut up about Ashley Cole probably yes the best left back of all time but every single video mentions the same argument just move on from it it’s done
You have to have Bobby Moore and Bobby Charlton in an all time eleven even if you didn’t watch them, they actually did something for the country unlike everyone in this video. It’s like not putting pele in an all time Brazil 11.
how does terry the racist always get into sides he made football worse and left a legacy of racially abusing a player on a pitch no wonder kick racism out of football doesnt work when it make splayers invincible against their own actions
Forget players from past Foden isnt above Sterling who is from same gen. Sterling been the Eng player under whatever success Southgate got. Sterling should be in
Sorry the disrespect in the backline for modern day, because this England team has been in semi finals and finals the ‘Golden Gen’ couldn’t even qualify properly
Buvey did make a legitimately good point about how this does largely feel like a Golden generation discussion, but then I thought about the midfield conersation. Of the modern options, Calvin Phillips and Jordan Henderson simply don't enter the debate, and the likes of Jude, Rice and Mainoo are far too early in their careers to be worth mentioning.
Buvey trying to squeeze in Foden on LW is mental. Dudes stinking up the gaff at LW in the last 2 weeks 😂😂. Gascoine was beautiful to watch but best English 11?? Not a chance. Scholes and Lampard all day. Winners the pair of them, win trophies is what they do. Gerrard is brilliant but he's just not got that winners pedigree the other 2 have.
I think a lot of the debate is lost by removing anyone they hadn't seen/watched. Buvey was right, it just became a 50/50 debate between the 'golden generation' and the current team. We all know that a large number of the 1966 team get in.
If it's English XI that includes club and national performances/career (1996-2024 for me)... 4-4-2 -------- Seaman Neville---Stones---Campbell---Cole Beckham---Ince---Scholes---McMannman Rooney---Kane 4-3-3 -------- Seaman Walker---Stones---Campbell---Cole Gerrard---Carrick---Scholes Sterling---Rooney---McManaman All Time ------------- Banks, Gazza, Moore, Charlton, Platt, Lineker all could get in various formations.
Can’t wait to hear Rory say how Ashley Cole is comparable to maradona and Robert Carlos and that foreign fans agree for the 20th time
Swear I've heard him say that 1000 times at this point
Why you hating on Ashley Cole?
he is comparable to roberto carlos tho. Best player of his position for several years
Hes slowly turning into Margaret Thatcher
He is correct though.
How do those this channel not have any graphic editing so we can see the players you have put in???
Laziness mostly.
Good luck with that. They don’t even describe the game of football they’re watching when they’re live.
In my opinion it's for viewership. If they put a graphic at the end people would just skip the video to the end just to see the side they picked rather than watching throughout
I think they did this live and this is just a snippet
@@lewisaspden3217It’s genuinely impressive how little they acknowledge the game at hand
You can’t talk about players you’ve never seen. It’s entirely pointless.
I agree but you can also never call it all time either.
@@joescott5322 Agreed. Video title - England's All-Time XI!
Then within the first 2 minutes it is said it is not the all time XI it is a recent XI...
It's not pointless fuck me guess you're 12 and think everything before 2015 doesn't matter
People talk about pele like he was the greatest thing ever but most people alive today haven’t even seen him play
The disrespect of this generation is a joke
My god did Buvey seriously say Foden was a better footballer then John Barnes. Please please don't speak on things you clearly have no idea about. Just say I've never seen John Barnes kick a football. And yes John Barnes could dictate play from Central midfield. Just watch any John Barnes game post injury. Went from the best winger in the country to the best midfielder in the country.
😂😂 I laughed so hard at that part. Between 87-91 Barnes was something else.
🗣️🤣💀
The disrespect for Shearer is unreal. Buvey said he isn't World Class, what drugs is Buvey taking?
He wasn't. Shearer was never even a top 10 striker in the world.
Rooney barely was a top 10 striker.
What is this narrative that foden “ran” a champions league final? Literally had one moment then ghosted the rest of the game.
One moment that you remember from a RUclips short lol he doesn’t have to score a hat trick to run a champions league final
@@chapman2001 no that’s literally the only thing I remember him doing and I’ve never seen a RUclips short of it what are you on about?
@@chapman2001he also has to do a lot also he was a sub, I’m pretty sure Jack grealish had more play time than him in the final
@@chapman2001Foden didn't run the game though
Cannot remember one moment from foden in euro 2020 what is buvey on about 🤣🤣
He played the first game in the group stages with his Gascoigne trim did absolutely horribly and never played again for the rest of the tournament
@@Shhhhhhhhhjjhe hit the post lol. Your Name just says it all about your low life. Touch grass
@@Shhhhhhhhhjj that’s what I was going to say wasn’t he literally pushed out the team by Saka 🤣
@@Cbfbxvzg well he broke his foot against Denmark
@@ManchesterCitySupremacythe semi final? He had the entire tournament to do something relevant 😂
Buvey - Shearer only has one PL title
Next minute - Rooney and KANE…what a combination
I don’t understand why people hold Kane to this god of England status when he is the biggest winner on a scale of only losers.
Also England's all time leading scorer. I'd have him in over shearer based on England contribution.
I'm having shearer, fowler or Owen over kane
This is for England, so none of them have won anything at international level.
@@YTA5690 But international football is one element but Shearer won a prem with Blackburn Rovers
@@benkrieser4199 no he didn't 😂
I swear Rory looks different every week. His hair randomly grows rapidly😂 1 minute he looks rough with short hair and stubble and then a week later he’s got long hair and no beard and looks 14 again. Mad to think he’s about 40
He’s trying different styles because the lighting exposes how bald he is on top. He now uses a sort of fluffy comb over technique to hide it.
@@WaniZame He's got full head of hair never going bald what talking about 😂😂
He's 41 next month
@@celticbarry9877is he that old? Himself and Goldbridge look young for their ages. Like Rory looks 31.
@@nffclaceynah not gonna lie he does have a pretty big bald spot on top. There was a video a while ago when he dropped his head down and you could see how he was covering it
did Buvey really put up Foden for an ALL TIME ENGLAND XI 😭😭
And over Barnes too 😂😂
Well they got Scholes in who was absolutely terrible for England. Never did anything and then retired
He ain’t even had 2 Good England performances🤣
And on the left 🤣
he loves spitting delusional shit he always does this haha
Another painful watch. Foden might be the most overrated player of all time.
Na Roberto Carlos probably is
Gerrard exists
Saka 🤣 they seriously suggested him over Beckham
@@Rob07544saka has done more for England in terms of performance and goals/ assists then foden has ever done for the white shirt yet foden was a serious debate in this video, now tell me which one is more overrated out of the two. Muppet
@@paramtageja6891Gerrard overrated? What a laugh.
Buvey says Shearer doesn’t get in the team because a lack of trophies and 3 mins late says Saka will never get in because trophies isn’t what matters 😂🙃 swear he’s cartoon character, just there to say stupid things to annoy people. He cannot be seriously there for his actual insight
Buvey shows that Man City fans know nothing about football. Shearer was the best pure number 9 but Kane/Rooney combination as a 9/10 gets them in over shearer but it doesn't negate Shearer was a world class finisher. 96 Golden boot + 2 goals at WC 98 and 2 goals at Euro 2000.
Shearer is an absolute lock in this team. In my opinion there is only one argument that you might use to delude yourself into thinking he isnt and that would be facilitating around a central midfield that is lacking in defensive rigidity, by selecting Rooney to shore up that weakness.
I loved the 'he has only won 1 premier league' yet he picks Harry Kane 😂
No mention of Bryan Robson?? The complete central midfielder. Also 26 goals in 90 international games for a CM is mental.
before their time tbh, but adam should of said him tho
But they mentioned john Barnes @@samuelbrown3326
As soon as Rory said Le-Saux over Pearce....that was the final straw in me giving the guy any acknowledgement at all....Honestly that comment is laughable!!! This guy's whole knowledge focuses around most of the Prem era and Chelsea bias only! For someone of his age, he is so narrowminded and ignorant of what is ability and isn't!!!
Agree...Kenny Samson was miles above Le Saux, let alone Pearce..
Trying to compare Foden to John Barnes is absolutely insane. John Barnes is better than Foden now, and in the future.
Madness😂. The disrespect on Barnes is shocking
Would have been Chris waddle for me on the Left, Waddle or Barnes anyhow. No shout for Hoddle in the centre?
Also Kyle walker over Neville 😂 walker only has pace
Video title - England's All-Time XI!
Then within the first 2 minutes it is said it is not the all time XI it is a recent XI...
Crazy
Gazza this gazza that. Steven Gerrard single handedly got England into the Brazil World Cup in 2014
To simply fob off Shearer for Kane is ridiculous. I STAN with Shearer!
This is for England not for Premier Leaguem none of them have had success for England.
how Micah Richards not being mention I dont know ? so disrespectful . he burst onto the scene
The fact that Gary Linker wasn't even mentioned as a shout for best England striker is crazy to me, and I'm not even English.
Ik it was a bit of a joke but arguing about the quality of the man for sol Campbell just to put Terry in instead was crazy 🤣
If they’d include quality of the man as a category, not a single member of the 2002-2006 Golden Generation is getting in this XI 🤣
Ultimate England Team and you’re not going to include the World Cup winning Captain? Genius.
Title is misleading, this is not an “All-Time XI”. Just a bizarre video idea if you’re going to ignore the one successful side England has had. I understand the desire to include players you’ve seen been Buvey is right, this is just a 1990’s-2020’s best XI
Not even mentioning Ian Wright is insanity to me😬
This list has almost no correlation with the national team.
This is an English 11 based loosely on the national team.
Phil Foden been discussed having done nothing for England & had 1 top level season at Man City who almost gurantee trophies.
Meanwhile Raheem Sterling was England best player when they reach Euro final was glossed over.
Raheem Sterling contributed alot more then Foden ever has for Man City during there best spells & contributed to more league titles and trophies.
Raheem Sterling had similar output as Foden did last season & similarly was viewed as arguably PL player of the year when City beat during 98 point title race where Liverpool lost it by 1.
City that season won the domestic treble + won league with 98 points with Sterling as the best player.
Foden won 1 trophy during a period where City won 6 titles in 7 years including a current 4-peat.
All it took was Phil Foden to have a great season for him to be viewed as Balon D'or level & he must be in an All-time 11.
City won a treble year prior with Foden hardly being involved as key player.
Fans are such aesthetic merchants.
You can't even use the trophy argument against Sterling otherwise it can't be used for Foden.
Sterling has 123 goals in the Premier league at 29.
Sterling is a much better LW then Phil Foden & winger in general.
They've got Scholes in who never had a good game for England
@@paramtageja6891 Scholes definitely had great games for England in qualifying.
Agreed
Not even a mention for Bryan Robson in midfield?! I thought Flav and Rory were a bit older and would therefore understand the levels he was at.
Exactly what I was thinking
Seaman best goalkeeper?
Leighton Baines not being second best left back?
Neville over Walker? What am I watching
Foden is nowhere near John Barnes level yet
Shearer was still hitting double figures in his last season. In the prem. He only didn't hit double figures 3 times and that was when he was injured.
Buvey... Foden over Barnes??? People are calling for foden to be dropped today against slovenia, let alone making a best XI.
. 1-Seaman
2-Walker 5-Rio 4-Terry 3-Cole
7-Beckham 8-Gerrard 6-Scholes 11-Barnes
10-Rooney 9-Kane
That's a great team, I'd change kane for shearer but that's only my opinion
No Moore, Charlton, Banks or Hurst?
@@ManchesterCitySupremacy based on the lads rule of players I’ve watched. Otherwise yea absolutely 👍
@@ManchesterCitySupremacy How many full 90s have you watched of those players?
@@bengreenbankHe is a man city fan. He only found out about football a few years ago.
you cant say "this XI isn't about england performance" for one player than include a player in strictly for their england performances over way better players lmao
No consistency
The Shearer disrespect is so stupid man. Kane is lauded as incredible on here and shearer is still miles ahead for PL goals!
All for varied opinions as long as there’s still some sense involved
Kane is a stat padder. Never scored in a significant game. Linekar has
World cup 2022 quarter final against France.
Euro 2020 Ro16 against Germany
He scored against Germany in euros 3 years ago.
not even mentioned waddle - think you need to watch his highlights reel at OM
For me
Seaman, Neville, Pearce, Adams, Rio, gazza, Scholes, Becks, Platt, Shearer, and Lineker
For Buvey's benefit, I tried to put together an XI based on my limited understanding of football history (4-2-2-2):
GK: G Banks (the only ENG GK I've ever heard of getting respect from foreign fans, even if it is mostly for that one save!)
RB: V Anderson (no real outstanding candidates here TBH. Take your pick from Neville, Madeley, Neal, Walker, TAA, Steven etc)
CBs: R Ferdinand & B Moore (think they'd compliment each other's games well with a bit of luck)
LB: As Cole (think Rory overrates him, but obv choice.)
DCM: D Edwards (what might have been, but was already Ballon d'Or podiumist and best player on league winning teams without that)
CM: B Robson (Beckham vs Greece, but every week. Just unlucky with injuries, and maybe picking United over Liverpool)
RAM: T Finney (versatile, two-footed, great crosser, passer and dribbler and solid goal scorer. Less selfish than Matthews)
LAM: B Charlton (first name on the team sheet. Only Englishman with a Ballon d'Or, WC winners medal and UCL winners medal)
CF: K Keegan (hard working star. Did it at home and in Germany. Two time Ballon d'Or winner)
S: J Greaves (highest scoring human in the big 5 euro leagues' history*. Peaked early, but peaked highest of all England's great strikers)
Obvs many, many players unlucky not to get in. Probably closest to putting Rooney in over Keegan of all those that didn't make it. Picked a formation that avoids having a LW but still relatively weak areas in RB and DM I guess. Might have mentioned the Ballon d'Or too many times during that list! Oh well.
* if you believe Messi and CR7 aren't human anyway. Though I've also heard G Muller might be #3, rather than Greaves. I dunno, depends who you ask it seems.
That's a great, great team. Good choices
Flav is the only sensible one here. Kane above Shearer? Gimme a break
Gerrard was the greatest Premier League mdifielder of all time. He could excel in any midfield role.
So why were we over run with gerrard - Lampard midfield
@@WasimAhmed-zp2cmbecause of coaching, we needed a linchpin behind them and we didn't have it
But his performances for England were generally sub par (same can be said for Lampard and Scholes).
😂
ruclips.net/video/p6jVRGsFxe0/видео.htmlsi=7kNY1GKIwsLlAgfp
Henry picked Scholes and played against both.
Pep picked Scholes over Lampard and Gerrard
ruclips.net/video/1mPknjBxf3o/видео.htmlsi=MM64KaWm84_qmCRO
Players you haven’t seen play is certainly relevant but not when it’s being discussed by RUclipsrs… let football historians who know their stuff argue that, if you’re a fan though just talk about what you’ve seen
Walker is already ahead of Gary Neville.
Unless you're talking about Man U, please leave Adam out of the conversation. He'd make Keane English just to put him in the team.
I thought he made some decent choices
Lol the Buvey close up and disssapointed headshake when Becks mentioned as RM - hahahaha, shots like that are why I keep watching this channel.
What about an all time XI who could have qualified for playing for England, but never had a cap?
Some of you are older than me and you don’t mention Des Walker??
No running visual of the team as you build it?
Didn't want us skipping to the end, just to see the names?
Scholes has done nothing for England, Gerrard is a better all round player compared to Lampard and Scholes.
Scholes literally dominated midfield against the likes of zidane
Lampard has done more than Gerrard for England.
Gerrard has been solely at fault for being knocked out at world cup 2014 and losing to France is 2004, both being silly back passes.
@@WasimAhmed-zp2cmGerrard was in the Euro team of the tournament, I don’t think Lampard has ever done that well for England in a tournament. And Gerrard basically has to sacrifice his best position so they could fit Lampard in
I think you forgot about marcelo he was better in his prime
Buvey is one of the most clueless people I've ever seen lool.
GK: Gordon Banks
RB: Kyle Walker
CB: Bobby Moore
CB: John Terry
LB: Ashley Cole
CM: Nobby Styles
CM: Paul Gascgoine
CAM: Bobby Charlton
RM: Stanley Matthews
LM: Geoff Hurst
ST: Jimmy Greaves
duncan Edwards in walker out. Rooney in hurst out.
@@aranyaism Edward’s isn’t a right back
Just cos you aint seen michael jordan play or Ali fight or pele or maradona play doesnt mean you dont add them to the all time greats lists.
You are better off not having an all time list talk if you aint going to go off legacy.
I’m absolutely certain they’ve made this video 7 times within the last couple of months
Seaman
Neville Campbell Rio Cole
Beckham Scholes Robson Barnes/Gazza
Owen Rooney
That's a hell of a team! I'd go with that.
Not a single one of these people saw John Barnes play anywhere near his peak.
Rory is 41 years old in a month mate. He would’ve seen John Barnes in his peak while he was a kid.
Campbell over Terry
Why is Hugh Wizzy in the thumbnail?
to get views
@@mahkimahkila6396 Hugh Wizzy ain't more of a draw than the rest of The Club😂😂
@@blirt1653 considering everyone spent the entire time he wasn't on the kick off spamming the chat with "where's Hugh??"
I'd say he is
don't ask questions if you don't want the answers
@@mahkimahkila6396 The Club realise because they've changed the thumbnail? Genuine error from them, genuine comment from me. Only thing strange here is the attitude you demonstrate in your comment lol.
Noone will ever overtake Beckham, based entirely on his brand. Unless Bellingham becomes a right midfielder, it will still be Becks in 20 years
The disrespect to Shearer is becoming disgraceful.
You really choose Shearer over Kane?
@@dylanbishop4175 Yeah, easily Shearer at his peak centre forward play (minus his finishing) was much better than Kane..
Shearer was a fantastic striker... but Rooney was a better player and Kane is a better finisher. We're talking really high level and you'd be happy with any of them!
Shearer was a better number 9 than Kane. Kane might be a slightly better ball player/passer but in terms of holding up the ball and finishing Shearer is better. And Buvey digging out Shearer for only having 1 league title when Kane has 0 is ironic and moronic😂
@@kailashpatel1706 then you're clueless, everything Shearer could do Kane can do better, whilst also having the capability of playing as a 10.
You are clueless my guy, and before you bring stats up for PL remember Shearer played in the 42 game seasons and Kane was on track to beat his record.. I mean Rooney came close whilst playing as a 10/8/anywhere so it shows Shearers stats wasn't impressive
Banks; Wilson; Moore; Terry; Cole; Beckham; Charlton; Robson’s; Gascoigne; Greaves, Rooney. I’m 66 and not English.
Besides Bobby Charlton...Paul Gascoigne is the best creative midfield has ever had....There is nothing romantic about choosen Paul over Gerald ( different players cos i would out him alongside him) he was a better midfield than Lamps
Better for England than Scholes....If Paul Gascoigne went to Man united he would have won everything as well..thats how good he was
Does Buvey know who John Barnes was? The best winger this country has seen and then moved into the middle later on and became a leader and controller of the game. One of the most gifted players this country has ever seen
Always though Giggz followed John Barnes in that aspect.
This team will be alot more interesting once the current young English players finish their careers
Carrick Scholes midfield two wins you the World Cup btw
Yes Rory Sherringham was so much better then Cole that’s why Cole kept Sherringham on the bench for the 99 season 😂
Best players I've seen.
Seaman
Walker Ferdinand Terry Cole
Beckham Scholes Gerrard Gascoigne (sorry he's going left)
Rooney Kane
Best England form.
Pickford (20)
Neville (96) Ferdinand (02) Adams (96) Cole (06)
Beckham (02) Gascoigne (96) Rice (20) Sterling (20)
Rooney (04) Shearer (96)
MF is the hardest. Probably Scholes in 02/04 was better than Gerarrd and Lampard ever were. An argument for Hargreaves in 06 as well but did not play as much. Gone with Rice because he was playing brilliantly in the final vs Italy before he got taken off.
Rory I wouldn’t be so sure some blokes in Brazil are sitting around putting Ashley Cole in their all time XI.
I love buvey and respect that he made the right call that Gerrard should be in midfield but he was so wrong on Barnes. Barnes was unbelievable
Theiry Henry picked Scholes over Gerrard and Pep Guardiola picked Scholes over both Lampard and Gerrard.
ruclips.net/video/1mPknjBxf3o/видео.htmlsi=29ZVgjXRsdLooGUr
____________Seaman
Walker____Rio___Terry____Cole
Becks__Gerrard__Lamps__Jude
_______Rooney____Kane
Paul Scholes a system player?! But I thought Fergie had no tactics and was just vibes and spent loads of money?!?!?! Nevermind the fact that Scholes played 3 different roles to an elite level throughout his career.
Gerrard clear
Can’t believe no talked about Gary Lineker for ST and Chris Waddle for Wingers or Stuart Pearce for LB.
The disrespect for Shearer "Overrated!" Whilst outscoring the likes of Henry, Bergkamp, Cantona. By far, the best pure Premier League striker England has had.
Rory saying don’t go off of moments for England then does exactly that for Gazza. 😂😂
Do this every year
Paul Ince was one of the best midfielders in England. I would say he was better for England than Steven G, Lampard and Scholes. He had a great club career as well.
Hence why Roh Keane had Paul Ince in his all time best for Man United team
Roy Keane a bitter twat because Scholes is rated more highly by United fans and his former team mates plus the lies of Henry and Pep.
Classic 4-4-2
Players I've seen:
Shilton
Neville, Terry, Butcher, Cole
Mcmanaman, Gascoigne, Scoles, Barnes
Owen, Shearer
All time:
Banks
Cohen, Terry, Moore, Cole
Ball, Gascoigne, Charlton, Barnes
Linekar, Greaves
Matthews over Ball surely?
Where’s Nobby Styles?
@@ManchesterCitySupremacy for team balance who would miss out? gascoigne is the most talented player england has ever produced and if hoddle wasnt a stupid to drop him in 98 he would have helped push england even further in the tournament.
stiles would be my first sub
@@spankkydelic2501 mathews was a Right outside forward the formation doesnt fit him. 4-3-3 formation he would be in there. But im using the classic 4-4-2 that england have nearly always used post 1950
If you included the ones you havent seen then the team just has to be the 66 world cup winning team.
Can someone explain how Pickford isn't number one equalled bank's clean sheet record in the same amount of games, 2 Finals, One semi and multiple penalties saved in big moments,
Just wish Rory would shut up about Ashley Cole probably yes the best left back of all time but every single video mentions the same argument just move on from it it’s done
Shearer scored more goals, Rooney won more throphies.
Kane shouldn't be considered the greatest English attacker.
i love the studio u have
You have to have Bobby Moore and Bobby Charlton in an all time eleven even if you didn’t watch them, they actually did something for the country unlike everyone in this video. It’s like not putting pele in an all time Brazil 11.
Geoff Hurst too
@@ChronicTheHempHog-mf3nhyeah but Geoff hurts wasn’t even the best English striker in 66.
You can’t really give much insight though to those players & it’s not good for a video
So just the whole 66 squad?
I thought this was based on players from their time. I don't believe any of these guys were around in 66.... 😂
how does terry the racist always get into sides he made football worse and left a legacy of racially abusing a player on a pitch no wonder kick racism out of football doesnt work when it make splayers invincible against their own actions
Peter Shilton not getting mentioned made me feel old
Kyle Walker and Ashley Cole are the most over-hyped fullbacks... Obviously ENGLISH BIASED as you compare with Roberto Carlos and Paulo Maldini.
English bias in an ENGLAND best XI??? Crazy talk.
. Seaman
Rio Terry Cambell
Walker Cole
Beckham Scholes Gerrard
Rooney Kane
Forget players from past Foden isnt above Sterling who is from same gen. Sterling been the Eng player under whatever success Southgate got. Sterling should be in
Pickford is bang average
Man England is really lacking in the goal keeper department
Sorry the disrespect in the backline for modern day, because this England team has been in semi finals and finals the ‘Golden Gen’ couldn’t even qualify properly
Buvey did make a legitimately good point about how this does largely feel like a Golden generation discussion, but then I thought about the midfield conersation. Of the modern options, Calvin Phillips and Jordan Henderson simply don't enter the debate, and the likes of Jude, Rice and Mainoo are far too early in their careers to be worth mentioning.
Wow how does Bellingham not get talked about for midfield!! Probably the best centre mid about at the minute
Not sure how old you guys are but surprised Des Walker didn’t get a mention, in his prime one of the best in the world
Rory was drunk with that statement that Sheringham was better than Andy Cole
Totally forgot Gary Linekar somehow
Buvey trying to squeeze in Foden on LW is mental. Dudes stinking up the gaff at LW in the last 2 weeks 😂😂. Gascoine was beautiful to watch but best English 11?? Not a chance. Scholes and Lampard all day. Winners the pair of them, win trophies is what they do.
Gerrard is brilliant but he's just not got that winners pedigree the other 2 have.
Saying foden gets in at lw without breaking down sakas claim to right wing is crazy to me
I think a lot of the debate is lost by removing anyone they hadn't seen/watched. Buvey was right, it just became a 50/50 debate between the 'golden generation' and the current team. We all know that a large number of the 1966 team get in.
Buvey’s modern football bias is a joke
If it's English XI that includes club and national performances/career (1996-2024 for me)...
4-4-2
--------
Seaman
Neville---Stones---Campbell---Cole
Beckham---Ince---Scholes---McMannman
Rooney---Kane
4-3-3
--------
Seaman
Walker---Stones---Campbell---Cole
Gerrard---Carrick---Scholes
Sterling---Rooney---McManaman
All Time
-------------
Banks, Gazza, Moore, Charlton, Platt, Lineker all could get in various formations.