Will it ever be driven on the Nürburgring? That 919 record could be in jeopardy? Or the McMurtry? Who knows? Afaik the McMurtry was never run on the Ring.
i dont think it would beat the spierling, it doesnt have enough downforce to accelerate, as quick. but it might be a great contender in a high speed circuit like spa, cota, or monza
@@foxgaming76yt24 you’re a little mistaken in your assessment. Downforce is always the enemy of acceleration, the sperling is so fast because of the electric drivetrain it uses, instant torque that never drops off has incredible advantages over ICE. The Sperling’s fan aids it in removing turbulence from underneath the car along with providing downforce, it’s doing two things, not just one. Removing the turbulence does aid the straight line speed, but the downforce decreases the acceleration. It’s basic physics
@@narrowistheway77 Instant torque without grip means absolutely nothing. I'm not even sure what exactly you mean when you say the floor's supposed to remove "turbulence", as if it's meant to reduce drag in some manner. But regardless, I'm not sure why you believe having more downforce results in poorer acceleration.
@ it’s called the Bernoulli effect(as it applies with air, not liquid). Downforce increases the coefficient of drag, this is why the McLaren F1 was made for low downforce rather than high downforce and remained the fastest car in the world for a decade using a lightweight philosophy combined with a low coefficient of drag(low downforce and slippery in the air). That’s also why the McLaren F1 in its LM trim was significantly slower to accelerate and couldn’t achieve nearly as high of a top speed, it was given a body kit designed for producing significant downforce thereby reducing acceleration/speed. Once again, this is basic physics, not even complex physics. You also might want to look into the way the Sperling’s vacuum fan was designed to work, because removing the turbulence from underneath the car is one of it’s primary purposes within that particular design, the downforce alone isn’t why that car sticks to the road so well, it’s more complex than that
This looks like an amazingly fun ride! I want one!
Looks like a CANAM car.
those front fenders look like they generate a huge blind spot for the driver.
Will it ever be driven on the Nürburgring? That 919 record could be in jeopardy? Or the McMurtry? Who knows? Afaik the McMurtry was never run on the Ring.
NZ has brought the world many firsts.
Burt Munro was another genius that came from that island.
John Kenton Britten as well.
Don’t forget Bruce mclaren
Both Bruce McLaren and burt Monroe was from the north island
@@yota8325Burt Munro from Invercargill….. South Island!!!
Your wrong about Burt Munro he was born in Edendale, in Southland New Zealand…..not in the North Island.
i dont think it would beat the spierling, it doesnt have enough downforce to accelerate, as quick. but it might be a great contender in a high speed circuit like spa, cota, or monza
Downforce is your enemy for acceleration, but it’s your friend in the corners, food for thought
@@narrowistheway77 More downforce improves grip and in turn acceleration, that's how the Speirling accelerates as fast as it does.
@@foxgaming76yt24 you’re a little mistaken in your assessment. Downforce is always the enemy of acceleration, the sperling is so fast because of the electric drivetrain it uses, instant torque that never drops off has incredible advantages over ICE. The Sperling’s fan aids it in removing turbulence from underneath the car along with providing downforce, it’s doing two things, not just one. Removing the turbulence does aid the straight line speed, but the downforce decreases the acceleration. It’s basic physics
@@narrowistheway77 Instant torque without grip means absolutely nothing. I'm not even sure what exactly you mean when you say the floor's supposed to remove "turbulence", as if it's meant to reduce drag in some manner. But regardless, I'm not sure why you believe having more downforce results in poorer acceleration.
@ it’s called the Bernoulli effect(as it applies with air, not liquid). Downforce increases the coefficient of drag, this is why the McLaren F1 was made for low downforce rather than high downforce and remained the fastest car in the world for a decade using a lightweight philosophy combined with a low coefficient of drag(low downforce and slippery in the air). That’s also why the McLaren F1 in its LM trim was significantly slower to accelerate and couldn’t achieve nearly as high of a top speed, it was given a body kit designed for producing significant downforce thereby reducing acceleration/speed. Once again, this is basic physics, not even complex physics. You also might want to look into the way the Sperling’s vacuum fan was designed to work, because removing the turbulence from underneath the car is one of it’s primary purposes within that particular design, the downforce alone isn’t why that car sticks to the road so well, it’s more complex than that
Ice can beat electric but it needs the fan.
Thanks for this video Chris 😅😅
Cheers Chris! 👍💪✌️
shinnseiki GPX formula
Uma versão aspirada seria a melhor opção, esse carro precisa ir pra Goodwood
Yes it would beat it!! You can't beat a V10 😮😮 best engine ever😅😅
the crank is 45k Eur....
just the crank
South African accent jesus it's like a washing machine filled with blocks of wood on bedding wash cycle.
No, simple.