Top 7 Cars where Size DOES NOT Matter

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
  • Well, you know what they say - there’s no replacement for displacement.
    Or is there? Hmmm…
    Hey guys, Stype here, bringing you a list of the Top 7 Really Fast Cars
    with teeny tiny engines.
    ___________________________
    music: www.bensound.com/
    Saturdays by LAKEY INSPIRED / lakeyinspired
    Bensound - Elevator Bossa Nova
    Special Thanks:
    John Keep
    PROJECT1
    Lou Costabile
    Drive N Slide
    CarRanger
    Exotic Motorsports of Oklahoma
    Pfaff Reserve
    The Dutch Texan
    JBB013 - Supercar Videos
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 713

  • @JotapeRR
    @JotapeRR Год назад +785

    So everytime Jaguar tried to make a supercar, a global crisis started... 🤔🤔🤔

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +223

      Very sus indeed

    • @rydersherm2490
      @rydersherm2490 Год назад +74

      It's well known the XJ220 was sabotaged from not only the global crisis, but due to internal issues in Jaguar itself. Maybe the CX75 suffered the same fate?

    • @aneeshats1216
      @aneeshats1216 Год назад +30

      So will a interplanetary crisis happen if they tried to make a hypercar

    • @robertnicholson7733
      @robertnicholson7733 Год назад +7

      @@rydersherm2490
      Not really, in a crisis it is not a good look to buy an outrageously expensive car. This is not new, in the great depression, people were hiding their luxury cars, probably trying to avoid being lynched. I can remember something about a V16 Caddy that was hidden, then it sort of got forgotten for a while before being rediscovered. Sounds strange? You should look up the story about the prototype WWII de Havilland Mosquito aircraft that was hidden in a barn to stop it from being junked, it worked, the thing is now restored, but buy a property and find a semi-forgotten, unique aircraft in one of the outbuildings. Okay, some of the details might be wrong, it has been along time since I originally read about it but the main gist of the story is correct.
      The internal issue for the XJ220 was actually Walkinshaw (who built the Xj220 for Jaguar) releasing the XJR15 , a road going (sort of) version of the Silk Cut, XJR-9, a V12 Le Mans (outright) winning racing car. He also convinced Jaguar (probably rightly) that the V12 Xj220 prototype was too big, too heavy, too complicated, etc and the simplified V6 would be better. Silly, really, people were not buying it for performance but for status and the glorious V12 soundtrack. Funnily enough, the V6 sounds pretty good and very aggressive when pushed.

    • @shawnchablal7729
      @shawnchablal7729 Год назад +4

      Fr had it made it to production the cx75 would have sold like the p1 and 918

  • @kelemenkaban2505
    @kelemenkaban2505 Год назад +373

    A Danny Trejo joke, and Stype is still alive... the man is a legend!

    • @Paul-Lyons
      @Paul-Lyons Год назад +2

      It’s not Liam Neeson or, in the worst case, Norris joke.

    • @jamescahn87
      @jamescahn87 Год назад

      Dude made a fake boobs joke while showing a pic of "caitlyn" Jenner in another video and isn't canceled. 😮

    • @MaverickPhantom
      @MaverickPhantom 5 месяцев назад

      ​@jamescahn87 give it 2 more years and a reach to a total of 1 million subscibers...
      Hope things are better in 2 years though

  • @roll_and_on_greatest
    @roll_and_on_greatest Год назад +369

    I expect to be a Koenigsegg Gemera with 2L I3 Twin Turbo that produce 600 HP!!

    • @henriquefurtadoribeiro5523
      @henriquefurtadoribeiro5523 Год назад +8

      Me too

    • @themuffincat
      @themuffincat Год назад +2

      Wait doesnt it produce 600hp with the help of electric motors?

    • @roll_and_on_greatest
      @roll_and_on_greatest Год назад +63

      @@themuffincat no. It's all 600 HP from the engine ALONE! The total horsepower should be 1700 HP with the help of the electric motors.

    • @sakariyemahamud1707
      @sakariyemahamud1707 Год назад +14

      @@themuffincat the gemera make 1700 HP the 3 cylinder alone makes around 600 HP the electric motor makes 300 HP and there is 3 of them

    • @yamivaneer2773
      @yamivaneer2773 Год назад +2

      I think everyone did

  • @loucostabile
    @loucostabile Год назад +49

    More humor in this car video than Comedy Central presents in a week. OUTSTANDING CHOICES and laugh out loud brilliant humor.

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +5

      Thanks Lou!

    • @1nfiniteloop
      @1nfiniteloop Год назад +1

      I subbed for the LOL's oh, and the cars were pretty dope too! Faster than a cancelled Gym membership in Feb! KEK !!!

  • @robloxcreator437
    @robloxcreator437 Год назад +219

    The turbo s is proably the most efficient, sports/supercar you can buy, even being able to gap a plaid from 0 to 80 till it catches but it was only 600 hp. Crazy to think about it like that.

    • @Nfs-HP-Enjoyer
      @Nfs-HP-Enjoyer Год назад +18

      Plaid couldn't even beat a normal 911 Turbo , so if its turbo s then there's no fucking chance for it

    • @locom7657
      @locom7657 Год назад +6

      Catches? After 80 miles the 911 pulls away even more.

    • @robloxcreator437
      @robloxcreator437 Год назад +9

      @@locom7657 does not, watch throttle house the 911 turbo s evens with the plaid at first then the plaid out runs it.

    • @mykehyslop198
      @mykehyslop198 Год назад

      Proably ? 🤔

    • @jonesjonz1
      @jonesjonz1 Год назад

      @@robloxcreator437 Porsche groupies love to make up sh!t... LOL!! Porsche won't even tell the public what the car really pushes on over boost. Because they want it to look like an over achiever. Only 600hp my ass, you believe that I have a 3 dollar bill I'd like to sell you for 5 bucks.... dummies.

  • @joshthetrucker9589
    @joshthetrucker9589 Год назад +102

    There's a reason this car channel is one of my top all time favorite's. It's incredibly biased, has no filter, and names off cars that sometimes even I never knew existed. But, it gets to the mest and potatoes, makes points that I actually consider and book into my memory, and is damn entertaining. You're up there with Throttle House, Stype. Also you have a very pretty face accorsing to that decade old photo.

  • @khaledzekri9951
    @khaledzekri9951 Год назад +77

    I still don't understand why Jaguar still don't grace us with that mighty CX-75 today!!

    • @exoticsoflt
      @exoticsoflt Год назад +18

      They're just more focused on the EV future these days, which is a shame. For us, real petrolheads EVs just isn't something to be excited for.

    • @justastratos3148
      @justastratos3148 Год назад +9

      I know right! They are putting their most sucsessful models out of production.

    • @vaultdweller2287
      @vaultdweller2287 Год назад +1

      @@justastratos3148 jag is going electric because their old models didn’t sell…

    • @lilshax7297
      @lilshax7297 Год назад

      Rip Jag 💀💀

    • @vaultdweller2287
      @vaultdweller2287 Год назад

      @@lilshax7297 sadly yes

  • @simonjaramilloh
    @simonjaramilloh Год назад +75

    This channel should have more recognition!!! It's unique

  • @marvinsamuels1237
    @marvinsamuels1237 Год назад +59

    The Bugatti EB110SS that came out around the same time as the XJ220 with similar spec was probably worth a mention…
    It had a 3.5l quad turbo 60 valve V12 that put out 603hp and managed 0-62 mph in just over 3.4 seconds.
    The cylinder count may not be small, but the capacity was.

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +7

      Yes, that's a good pick

    • @pixelnazgul
      @pixelnazgul 9 месяцев назад +1

      Underpowered. They should have increased the bore, instead of destroking it.

  • @davekennedy6315
    @davekennedy6315 6 месяцев назад +3

    In Formula 1 in the 1980s (the turbo generation) there were 1.6ltr 4 cylinder turbo charged engines putting out 900-1000bhp! The ultimate was a BMW version that could output possibly up to 1500bhp in qualifying trim! In the early 80s!

  • @GarbanzoBeansFan
    @GarbanzoBeansFan Год назад +11

    I love the meme tie-ins in the videos. Great job Stype 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

  • @gauravkumar3146
    @gauravkumar3146 8 месяцев назад +1

    This is probably the best auto review channel. Jokes apart THIS IS THE BEST auto review channel on RUclips.

  • @narrowistheway77
    @narrowistheway77 Год назад +3

    The F40 was the first where the company advertised the 200mph barrier was crossed, but the first car that was released that could truly do it was the Porsche 959

    • @Nozerone
      @Nozerone Год назад

      The 959 topped out at about 196/197 mph, it's the 959s that broke the 200 mph mark. It doesn't matter though, because the 959 was a homologation special, not an actual production car like the F40 was. So the F40 still gets to claim the first production car to break 200 mph. Now some may want to argue that the Dodge Challenger actually did it first, but even that isn't true. Because the one that did reach 200 was a race modified vehicle. A Daytona that got sold out of a showroom wasn't the same as the one that hit 200 mph, and again the version that hit 200 was once again a homologation special which was made so Dodge could race that design.

  • @franktyneski7158
    @franktyneski7158 Год назад +5

    Loved this …but the Alpha 4C would be another in the power to weight ratio honorable mentions

    • @TheRealCoyote
      @TheRealCoyote Год назад +1

      And not just power to weight, it's bloody fast period. Add to that it's not that expensive considering the performance. Much faster than the specs would suggest on any twisty bit of tarmac.

  • @Thecreatorshaq
    @Thecreatorshaq Год назад +3

    Most underrated car channel. Keep them coming.

  • @zzzzz6078
    @zzzzz6078 Год назад +4

    This is the "my type of car content" with great sense of humor.
    Hope to see this channel in million subs soon 😉

  • @riley7719
    @riley7719 Год назад +11

    Keep doing the good work and presenting the car related topics in a humours way

  • @Xledyz
    @Xledyz Год назад +2

    The mentions are the bmw i8 amg one and lancia 037 stradale

  • @nicolasgoncalvespereira655
    @nicolasgoncalvespereira655 Год назад +9

    Damm, the CX-75 was beautiful. It tops out the 918 and the P1 in terms of looks easily, only losing to the LaFerrari.

    • @kilotiger7780
      @kilotiger7780 Год назад +3

      I don't agree. But it's your opinion

    • @nicolasgoncalvespereira655
      @nicolasgoncalvespereira655 Год назад +3

      @@kilotiger7780 Nice behavior! Finally someone on the internet that actually understands what an opinion means without having a stupid reaction or an argument. Which is the best looking of Trio for you, though?

    • @kilotiger7780
      @kilotiger7780 Год назад

      @@nicolasgoncalvespereira655 Argh that's a tough one. They say modern cars don't have character and all look the same. Well this is an exception. All four are amazingly and uniquely designed with beauty but also functionality in mind. That's what makes them so timeless. For me however the reason why I don't think the cx75 has a better design than the Porsche and the mc is because it is a much safer design and not as daring and for that reason i think it has aged a bit more than the other 3. However,this is just my opinion. I might be wrong. At the end of the day,all 4 are pinnacles of engineering and technology that to this day still manage to look jaw dropping

    • @nicolasgoncalvespereira655
      @nicolasgoncalvespereira655 Год назад +1

      @@kilotiger7780 Exactly my thoughts. It's called the "Holy Trinity", not only because of their spetacular achievements and engineering, but especially because even though they are modern supercars, they look achingly beautiful. Most modern supercars look generic, repetitive and undistinctive. But not these 4 don't. They will age well and always look good. The holy grail of automotive industry.

    • @kilotiger7780
      @kilotiger7780 Год назад +1

      @@nicolasgoncalvespereira655 Exactly my thoughts. Cheers!

  • @larryboles629
    @larryboles629 Год назад +1

    Showed this video to my wife. She fell on the floor holding her sides because of the pain from laughing so hard. When she had recovered I helped her to stand asking what was so funny. Red faced my wife looked at me as I was from another planet. Shaking her head my wife said that when top performace is needed there is no option but size. Smiling at me she went on to say "bigger is always better baby." We did not have time to talk about it any more as she had to leave for her weekly class in rug hooking. Damn that girl has been studing rug hooking in these classes for 18 months now and I have yet to see a single rug.

  • @PureDhan
    @PureDhan Год назад +1

    Anyone noticed when the video ends and he said “What A Car” the moment he said “Car” a car video showed up in that exact second 😂

  • @marvinjudegorospe8181
    @marvinjudegorospe8181 Год назад +11

    As always, great content. How about doing a list of most disappointing family or fast cars and what could make them better.?

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +3

      Hey, thanks, and I already did a list of disappointing cars

  • @art__3842
    @art__3842 Год назад +1

    Title : Top 7 cars where size doesn't matter
    Me : wish I was treated like those cars

  • @priyanshushah2345
    @priyanshushah2345 Год назад +4

    I still want to know why you thought the gemera wasn't worth the list
    yes it's expensive as fk and mostly electric but since when was 600hp from a 2L not an achievement.
    still a great list and vid

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +4

      This video isn't about small engines with lots of power, but fast cars with small engines.
      Gemera is fast mostly because of electric motors, and that's why it's not going in the list. Having a small but punchy engine doesn't change that.
      It's like that part in Top Gear when they mocked American Green Car of the year - Cadillac Escalade Hybrid with 5.7L V8 and a small battery.

    • @priyanshushah2345
      @priyanshushah2345 Год назад +3

      @@TopCarsTV yeah I get that
      But you've got to be impressed by the engineering,
      I can't stop imagining something like an a110 with this engine
      Or maybe in an "entry level" smol ferrari back with the dino badge
      Hell, even in something like a gr yaris.
      Yes gemera might not be a fast car with small engine but the possibilities are limitless.
      But then again I'm confused why such big manufacturers won't make something like this, I don't think they can't.

    • @Gigachu.
      @Gigachu. Год назад

      I think the video should be based on "only" Gasoline running cars, hybrid electric motors paired with an engine doesn't hold a candle to me

  • @DatDudePlays
    @DatDudePlays Год назад +5

    Sad that the Koenigsegg Gemera didn't made it

  • @ralphharrison6622
    @ralphharrison6622 Год назад +3

    hahaha, referring to the ferrari as douche bag killed me! love the channel, dudes funny af

  • @shauryapriyam9707
    @shauryapriyam9707 Год назад +1

    Your editing skills are just getting better better and better...

  • @19muhammadalimoula88
    @19muhammadalimoula88 Год назад +3

    Dude wasn’t lying about the next vid being about small engines( go to the most overlooked cars vid and check for the replies under my comment to understand it)

  • @alexander4369
    @alexander4369 Год назад +2

    Nice list. I'm surprised you did not include Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale, tho

  • @leomux2004
    @leomux2004 Год назад +1

    Am I the only one who prefer smaller engines over the big ones? I mean, sure 600HP from a 6.2L V8 is a good number, but 600HP from a 2.0L 4 cylinder engine? That's impressive, and not to mention that being smaller means that this engine need to rev higher than bigger engines, so the sounds is music to my ears...🤤

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +1

      Huge power out of a small displacement usually means that the engine won't last as long

    • @leomux2004
      @leomux2004 Год назад +1

      @@TopCarsTV Depends how many power you put in that engine, where is its redline, how strong are the engine internals and how reliable are its electronics. So 600HP from a 2.0L 4 cylinder is possible for a road car, but anything beyond that wouldn't work reliably.

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +1

      @@leomux2004 1.6L 575hp V6 in AMG One lasts 30,000 miles.
      600 from 2.0L is hardly much better

    • @leomux2004
      @leomux2004 Год назад +1

      @@TopCarsTV Yes, but that's a F1 engine that was converted for road use, and originally it had 850HP from the ICE alone plus 160HP from the MGU-K, resulting in more than 1.000HP, but because of they all the known reasons, they adapted the engine, reduced it's redline from 15k rpm to 11k rpm, changed the engine internals, and added new stuff to make it daily-drivable (new coolimg system, starter motor, etc.). Now a clean-sheet design 2.0L I4 road car engine could reach those 600HP if it was designed for that purpose from scratch. So it depends from case to case...

  • @ktvcars
    @ktvcars Год назад +1

    Where is there 1.6 turbo Honda engines! ? Lol great video and jokes once again. Love it! 🎉

  • @michaelbutler2915
    @michaelbutler2915 Год назад +1

    Awesome presentation. I did not know some of these cars existed. Great compilation of information!

  • @kmisad
    @kmisad Год назад +1

    MAN!!! CX 75 ....what a perfectly balanced design!!!!

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +2

      Yes indeed! A truly gorgeous car

  • @svgaming2716
    @svgaming2716 Год назад +3

    Not having the koeinegsegg Gemera is a crime

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +1

      It's not. Gemera is not a good pick

    • @svgaming2716
      @svgaming2716 Год назад +1

      @@TopCarsTV it fits in good tho, 600 hp form a 3 cyl

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +1

      @@svgaming2716 I know. Still not a good pick

  • @RomainSandt
    @RomainSandt Год назад

    The CX75 is a tragedy. The 2008 can't explain it all. Ferrari, Porsche and McLaren sold out their hyper cars, the CX75 was far along. It was almost ready and had hype around it.

  • @kermit12348
    @kermit12348 Год назад +3

    amazing vid keep it up !

    • @kermit12348
      @kermit12348 Год назад

      @te-le-gramTopCars_Tv idk man

  • @imad_ad2415
    @imad_ad2415 Год назад +2

    koeinsegg gemera has left the chat

  • @alaaalshanti2530
    @alaaalshanti2530 Год назад +2

    There is the Koenigsegg Gemera too

  • @kamol402
    @kamol402 Год назад +1

    I have never enjoyed a car video like this 😂

  • @yassking04
    @yassking04 Год назад +2

    Hi @Stype187, i love your videos, but can you bring back the old underground song please, the old one makes the video much more beautiful

  • @iliketurbosofficial
    @iliketurbosofficial 6 месяцев назад +1

    7:12 THE MC DADDY💀

  • @Atawak-n9u
    @Atawak-n9u Месяц назад

    Yeah. For the record people have been hitting 200 since the 60s. The 200 mph mark, isn't really much of a landmark anymore. It's called the Superbird.been there, did that. The small displacement part is impressive to a degree, but none the less.

  • @kasugakyosuke6441
    @kasugakyosuke6441 Год назад

    The most serious contender isn't even there ! Since you spoke about abandoned or failed project, there's another one, called Peugeot Oxia, which was ready for production, but never did.
    The Peugeot Oxia, was the earliest ultimate speed record breaker, way before most of the famous cars. It only use a 2.85 L Twin Turbos V6, with a 680 HP.
    This engine was a direct detuned version of the ultimate speed record holder in a competition, which have been set on 24H of LeMans.
    This Oxia was literally a spaceship back at the time it went out. 4WD 4WS, active Aero, Solar cells to power the Aircon to keep maximum engine power, electronic magnetic injectors, the key was an electronic card, and much more things we're only getting nowadays 40 years later.

  • @christophecamus3295
    @christophecamus3295 Год назад +5

    Jaguar cx75 spec are amazing shame that it was never produced.
    Great video 📹 👍 thanks

  • @Getabsolutelyfabled
    @Getabsolutelyfabled 20 дней назад

    2:24. Most dirty joke that stype has ever said 😂

  • @partista77
    @partista77 Месяц назад

    A chill run down my spine when I thought I saw an Montecarlo.... No. Can't be. Is a 037 for sure😂😂😂😂

  • @michaelgakanga
    @michaelgakanga Год назад +2

    Jaguar and economic crisis is a weird situation. Watch them have something in store for this year or next year

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +2

      Considering that they don't have any hypercar planned for production, I think we're good.

  • @finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
    @finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 Год назад

    In the seventies I owned 3 minor models BMWs with 2 liter engines, and past 100 horsepower, which was much and impressive by that time (Also the fuel consumption)! Today I drive a 1500cc Peugeot diesel, with 102 horsepower, and faster than the first, and using much, much less fuel doing it!

  • @fobbitoperator3620
    @fobbitoperator3620 Год назад

    My buddy slapped a cold air intake, & some dangerously fast stickers on his resto-modded Yugo GT last week.
    He now calls it the "Gappasaurus Wrecks!"

  • @Mad9977
    @Mad9977 Год назад

    "...with a spinning Dorito in it..." 🤣

  • @DaveJordan310
    @DaveJordan310 Год назад

    Lovely editing and sense of humour 😁👏👏👏 Another subscriber gained

  • @DrRacer78
    @DrRacer78 Год назад +1

    9:51 That killed me 😂🤣

  • @utkrishsingh2118
    @utkrishsingh2118 2 месяца назад +1

    4:48 the W204 C63 , the engine is actually 6.2L not 6.3L

  • @matteooliveri9131
    @matteooliveri9131 Год назад +2

    the lancia delta s4 group B, pushing around 600hp with 1.7 liters displacement, in 1985, there was even a prototype for the group S (group s never started racing) with more than 1000hp and the same 1.7 litres twin charged (turbo and volumetric at the same time) 4banger

  • @comedyman112
    @comedyman112 Год назад

    @4:14 Volkswagen XL1 has a lower drag coefficient

  • @davekennedy6315
    @davekennedy6315 6 месяцев назад

    Its only the US that stuck with very large capacity prehistoric tech engines! European and Japanese car manufacturers have been using lower capacity, higher powered engines in general for DECADES!

  • @rishabsamat
    @rishabsamat Год назад

    The second car was the amg one from your honorable mentions

  • @manualdriver02
    @manualdriver02 Год назад +2

    I don’t think that the EV1 counts because you were talking about small engines and the EV1 is electric (meaning it doesn’t have one)

  • @williamwindom7898
    @williamwindom7898 Год назад

    Dodge in the 60s is on the Dodge Daytona that broke 201 mph on their test track and you are allowed to buy it since it was for NASCAR

  • @prayasdash
    @prayasdash 9 месяцев назад

    Turbo S is one of the most perfect cars one can buy. Want a Lamborghini? Ditch it, get Turbo S it'll be better and more comfortable to drive on typical roads and due to its rear engine placement it takes off like a rocket off the line, in carwow the Turbo S could do 2.5 seconds 0-60 miles, like literally. Plus it can take down every Lambo in a drag race, so that's a good value for money supercar killer.

  • @scottsayer6012
    @scottsayer6012 Год назад

    Really cool video, very well done!

  • @tayenderkumar3366
    @tayenderkumar3366 Год назад +1

    i found both jags to be most beautiful cars in the list

  • @philiprowney
    @philiprowney Год назад

    The GMA T.50 should have had a mention, a 4 liter v12 with over 650BHP, that revs to 12,100!!!!

  • @samuelvojtela3792
    @samuelvojtela3792 Год назад +1

    Finally, its like christmas morning when you make new videos

  • @marvinsamuels1237
    @marvinsamuels1237 Год назад

    I just remembered another one, the BAC Mono. It’s Ford sourced, Mountune tweaked 2.5l 4cyl produces 343bhp without the use of a turbo! 😮
    That’s 137bhp per litre! 😮😮

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад +1

      137hp/L is good but not mind-blowing. 24 years ago Honda S2000 had 124hp/L while a 2023 GMA T.50 pumps out 163hp/L

  • @imdumbforthings
    @imdumbforthings Год назад +1

    I never felt its guy is amazing act from explaining cars that I didn't know about and he's is humor is great even a comedy as well haha 😆 I hope u this man got alot of subs and views in the future, keep it up 🗿👌

  • @davemorin-if3wk
    @davemorin-if3wk 5 месяцев назад

    in 1952 BRM built a 1.5litre v-16 gran prix race car that had 750hp and 16,500rpm and was raced by stering moss who said it was the fastest most dangerous car he ever raced in the Belgium gran prix in 1955 juan fangio had it to 218mph and said he only had it to 10k rpm. 1.5 litre high horse power racing motors are not impossible to build. in fact from 1951-1965 all formula one race cars had to have a 1.5 litre motor those were the rules thats when the cooper climax and coventry V-8 four cam motors came out, till ford made the 3 litre lotus 49 in 1966 which is still used today in F1 race cars.

  • @dorr_elezabi
    @dorr_elezabi Год назад +2

    8:58 Nice idea to make the audience average watch time longer!

    • @VideoDotGoogleDotCom
      @VideoDotGoogleDotCom Год назад +1

      Asking people to write comments also makes it more likely for the RUclips algorithm to suggest a video, as far as I know. I mean, not the asking, obviously, but people actually commenting.

  • @khalidbinhareb4324
    @khalidbinhareb4324 Год назад +1

    Stype, did you really forget the Koenigsegg Gemera? 3 cylinders 2.0L plug in hybrid 1700hp.

  • @Khan0098assasin
    @Khan0098assasin Год назад

    Jag are u serious with last one😟😦😦😦😭😭what a car..... damn I wanna this car so bad😭Also amg new c63s super dope fast and Porsche... oh my god this engineering got my heart

  • @ionitaalexandru7342
    @ionitaalexandru7342 Год назад

    Bro your editing is funny af😂

  • @Shotbyha
    @Shotbyha Год назад +2

    Most underrated RUclipsr ever

  • @bugjuicer
    @bugjuicer Год назад

    Main reason the XJ220 never met its potential, was Jag was having its own crisis at the time and couldn't find the value in a hypercar. So the engineers built it in their own time as a passion project. They couldn't get funding for the V12, it would have been too long to use an existing one, and the AWD would have made the thing too heavy. They didn't want to shorten the dimensions and the lines, hence the V6 is swimming in space. There's room for all that stuff tho, if you wanted..

    • @lqr824
      @lqr824 Год назад

      I visited Eagle E-Types in 2002--you probably know who they are. They had an XJ220 for I think $120k. I should have bought an E-Type AND an XJ220.

  • @maggiejetson7904
    @maggiejetson7904 Год назад

    Enzo: aerodynamics are for people who can't build an engine.
    EV1: engines are for people who can't do aerodynamics.

  • @keino111689
    @keino111689 Год назад

    The edits and memes are killing me😂

  • @BlueJazzBoyNZ
    @BlueJazzBoyNZ Год назад +1

    The CX 75 is a Jewel

  • @CerberusTenshi
    @CerberusTenshi Год назад

    Stolen from Wikipedia:
    The Jaguar C-X75 is a hybrid-electric, 2-seat, concept car produced by British automobile manufacturer Jaguar Cars in partnership with the derivative of the Formula One team, Williams Advanced Engineering which debuted at the 2010 Paris Motor Show. The powertrain of the C-X75 concept is rated at 778 hp (789 PS; 580 kW) through four YASA electric motors, each of which drives one of the four wheels. The batteries driving these motors are recharged using two diesel-fed micro gas turbines instead of a conventional four-stroke engine. It was described as a design study that would influence future design and technology.

  • @Zyrus848
    @Zyrus848 5 месяцев назад

    1:34 ain't no way 💀 never thought every triangle was an illuminati

  • @OliverTrist
    @OliverTrist 5 месяцев назад

    Small engines with big turbos are fine and fun for the track, but not as ‘road’ cars.
    Ask anyone who drives a Volvo XC90; 2.0 litres that puts out 320bhp, trying to propel a vehicle that weighs 2.25 tonnes. It is constantly wheezing and changing gear to cope with even just small inclines. Thereby, it’s buzzy and noisy and not relaxing.
    In other words BHP is relevant on the track, but in 95% of road driving, TORQUE at LOW revs matters far more. My ‘runabout’ in the UK is a V8. It develops all of its torque at less than 1800rpm, which means that it rarely needs to change gear, which means it’s smoother and vastly more relaxing than a car that’s powered by a hairdryer.

  • @Lemmiou
    @Lemmiou Год назад +2

    Now just need to do the biggest engines.

  • @randypischke1270
    @randypischke1270 Год назад

    Big error with the F40. It was not the first production car to break 200. In april 1987 at the Road and Track top speed shootout, the Ruf yellow bird hit 211 mph

    • @TopCarsTV
      @TopCarsTV  Год назад

      I consider RUFs to be tuner cars. Yes they have their own VIN numbers but... Eh

  • @asadsankar589
    @asadsankar589 Год назад

    McLaren, Porche, Douche bag 🤣🤣🤣
    Literally caught me off guard

  • @yzedrohurlington3855
    @yzedrohurlington3855 Год назад

    im kinda sad to not see the VW XL1 here but eh, im not salty sinse the list was still very good

  • @joostprins3381
    @joostprins3381 Год назад

    Just look at the Donkervoort, 5 cilinder Audi engine with 500 hp in a car that weighs…. 750 kg. It’s the car which pulls the highest f force while cornering.

  • @jacobshawn1010
    @jacobshawn1010 Год назад

    NYC
    William engineering 😇👌

  • @courtneypuzzo2502
    @courtneypuzzo2502 Год назад

    to us in the US that's a fairly common size for a V6 engine not a V8 engine the biggest V8 used in a luxury car was Cadillac's 8.2 L V8 used in the 70s in the Fleetwood Series 75 Limousine Series 62 Eldorado/Deville etc. mind you in 1972 for example the Eldorado Convertible had 235 HP and 385 pf torque went from 0-60 in 9.7 seconds similar to a modern Toyota Camry though about 1300 LBs heavier and did the 1/4 mile in 17 seconds at 81 MPH

  • @anhondacivic6541
    @anhondacivic6541 Год назад +1

    1. BMW i8
    2. Amg one
    3. Lancia beta monte carlo

    • @MDDeGrande1994
      @MDDeGrande1994 Год назад

      Not the Beta Monte Carlo but the 037 Stradale.

  • @davidsherman7868
    @davidsherman7868 Год назад

    The Jaguar CX is a beautiful little badass.

  • @redzzzz203
    @redzzzz203 Год назад +1

    Turbo lag: a lag that i like - call of duty player

  • @TurboMountTV
    @TurboMountTV Год назад

    You for get the mighty Toyota MR-2 Turbo... The poor man's Ferrari.
    200 HP out of only 2 liters. IN 1989.

  • @LarsBergman-ld7kj
    @LarsBergman-ld7kj 5 месяцев назад

    Well how much punishment does a small engine with corresponding Hp/torque vs bigger engine last in the long run if we leave out the fueleconomy?

  • @extraflames5308
    @extraflames5308 3 месяца назад

    surprised lotus elise 2008 was not mentioned

  • @paulnieder4236
    @paulnieder4236 Год назад +1

    As always, your videos never fail to entertain!

  • @TheOriginalDJMoses
    @TheOriginalDJMoses Год назад

    When you said douchebag ferrari I lost it and now I'm crying and can't stop laughing. Lol

  • @T0NYMANUEL
    @T0NYMANUEL Год назад +4

    It's not about the size...it's about the work

  • @DjJoeEmeric
    @DjJoeEmeric Год назад

    EV1 ?!?!?!? big surprise , want it ! 😁

  • @tolitsdterrible4785
    @tolitsdterrible4785 6 месяцев назад

    I'd say whoever was managing Jaguar during that time is a friggin bad decision maker. That CX was awesome looking. Look at Jaguar now. They got totally left behind.

  • @biroattila21
    @biroattila21 5 месяцев назад

    Love the Turbo S

  • @Blue_Bird_Vision_5
    @Blue_Bird_Vision_5 10 месяцев назад

    I'm pretty sure that the Ferrari F40 was not the first production car to reach the 200mph mark

  • @lqr824
    @lqr824 Год назад

    One of the Caterham special models should have been included. Didn't they have a supercharged Hayabusa engine in one? 400HP in 500kg/1100lb?