Neutone Morpho, real-time Tone Morphing plugin, has arrived!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- We’re pleased to present Neutone Morpho, a real-time tone morphing plugin, today. Our cutting-edge machine learning technology can transform any sound into something new and inspiring.
neutone.ai/morpho
Transform your voice to mimic the elegance of a violin, turn a coffee cup and pen into a rhythmic drum set, the possibilities are endless with our ever-expanding store of exclusive models.
You can download and try Neutone Morpho for free with four models (timbres) for an unlimited time. Upgrading the plugin for 99USD gives you access to ten additional models, with over fifteen more available for direct purchase within the plugin itself. For those interested in creating their own Morpho model, we will soon launch Neutone Cocoon. It's our cloud model training service where you can upload your audio materials (note that upgrading to the full version is required).
We're excited to see what you'll create with Neutone Morpho and Neutone Cocoon! Let's begin exploring the limitless creative potential that Neutone offers!
great work, congrats!
Excellent 👍
Great work
insane !
great!
niiice!
Ok. That looks fun as f
❤👍👏
Hi there,
I see the violin morphing and am interested, could I make a song, phrase or just single note
played by bad sounding VSTi/Kontakt, sounding good, using your tool?
How I see it could be done:
I teach your model with excelent recordings (violin, trumpet...you name it) and then apply it to my bad VSTi/Kontakt sounds...
i that real?
I wonder how the "machine learning" algo works here. Couldn't this be achieved with a convolution reverb type plugin using sounds instead of impulse responses?
Basically, we used Machine Learning to design super-complex convolution (sort of) to achieve the magic!
Wasnt this free??
No, although Morpho does have a free version with a limited number of models for you to demo. You might be thinking of our community plugin, Neutone FX, which is indeed completely free. FX is a host plugin for researchers to experiment with AI models in the DAW. Morpho on the other hand is for artists who want to incorporate tone morphing in their music/sound design workflow. It uses our new proprietary ML tech and (very soon) will let users train custom models on their own sounds.
Has anyone given much thought to an idea that these AI tools undermine the work of actually creative people working with audio? People who have developed complex systems to articulate their concepts and creativity within their unique methodology?
I'm referring to the people that have put much time and work into developing an aesthetic through experimental process.
I think the results of these insta-tools are often wonderful, but there is no artistic process by simply buying one to achieve something that came from a creative person's methodology. Which is of course incredibly important to an artist. I understand that music is fun, especially the attachment of fantasy and idolatry, but for some people the experience of experimentation and creation go beyond a superficial ego charge. It's a journey and the result is only a small part of that.
I'm concerned that the area of culture that electronic music is attached to, in ways, is being completely commercialised and turned into a primarily consumerist cycle of capitalism.
RUclips is of course at the heart of the issue. It's potent in engaging new hobbyists in marketing and turning beloved culture into materialism. Diluting the passion into trendy consumerism for toys to slap the backs of other toys.
Thank you for your comment! As the CEO of Neutone, I fully understand your concerns. Unlike other text-to-music tools, we designed this plugin specifically for individuals who are dedicated to sonic experimentation. Our goal is to enable them to use our tools to innovate new music and music-making processes. Essentially, we're aiming to create a new synthesizer, or rather, a new sampling technology. If you still have concerns about the future of music-making, please reach out to us. We could be overlooking something.
@@naotokui Facts. From my experience Neutone are in the game of AI sound design tools that try to push sonic boundaries. I often have to put in alot of work to get something great out. There is a art to this
I genuinely feel like you don't know what music production is ..? Why are you describing it like these "creatives" singlehandedly created the concept of...morphing a sound? How would you even manually achieve this specific tone? It doesn't sound like a traditional instrument.
@dffgffffffdddddddddd specify what you mean by morphing. I don't believe that you "genuinely" think that. I think that people who have made innovative electronic music used innovative techniques that that were developed over time to create unique aesthetics. Bypassing the creative process by using tools that generate outcomes that would take years to develop, by the right kind of mind, is culturally tacky. Like using loop packs to create hip hop. That's fucking lame. So some toy can pretend they are a part of a culture which put great value on the come up. It's earned, not bought. If you can't understand that you are a toy. A person not deserving of respect within the culture.
It's a pretty simple argument. There will be a push back against lazy AI using simps
@dffgffffffdddddddddd Based on your response I think it is you that doesn't understand creativity, art, making and culture. I think it is you defending a bourgeois consumerism that negates creativity in favour of productivity, outcome and capital.
you are giving the illusion that it is an audio morphing, in reality it is a mixing of two sounds controlled in ination, in real time. true audio morphing takes into account the formant existing in the two sounds, to pass from one sound to the other in such an imperceptible way that the human being can distinguish at what point the transformation actually took place. unfortunately your system is still primitive: 30 years ago the first demonstration samples came out online, of which the audio quality was very poor, but the morphing was far superior to what you propose. When I hear a real morphing sound, I will I live to offer you a system that could revolutionize the way of offering music through audio morphing. Thanks for listening. I am amazed that the A. I haven't yet managed to self-train on audio morphing, given that already today on UDIO if you type a text the AI creates songs with singers included (which in some way is already trained to create physical models that follow musical rules) Thank you for listening. Santosh
you are giving the illusion that it is an audio morphing, in reality it is a mixing of two sounds controlled in ination, in real time. true audio morphing takes into account the formant existing in the two sounds, to pass from one sound to the other in such an imperceptible way that the human being can distinguish at what point the transformation actually took place. unfortunately your system is still primitive: 30 years ago the first demonstration samples came out online, of which the audio quality was very poor, but the morphing was far superior to what you propose. When I hear a real morphing sound, I will I live to offer you a system that could revolutionize the way of offering music through audio morphing. Thanks for listening. I am amazed that the A. I haven't yet managed to self-train on audio morphing, given that already today on UDIO if you type a text the AI creates songs with singers included (which in some way is already trained to create physical models that follow musical rules) Thank you for listening. Santosh