The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
My prima-facie opinion based on the portion shown in this video:- 1. No doubt that the lawyer came unprepared. But the Lawyer is also an officer of The court. The lawyer was extremely polite. If The Honourable Court itself abuses its officers by yelling at them, it will create an atmosphere of fear. Hence the way The Honourable Judge shouted at the lawyer is completely uncalled for & inhumane. 2. It's easier to remove a Prime Minister from his post than a High Court or Supreme Court judge. A High Court judge can be removed from the post only through an impeachment in the Parliament. Thus High Court Judges are vested with huge power & are well protected. So such power has to come with sense of humility. In my opinion, this judge needs to be sensitized by The Honourable Chief Justice of India on controlling his anger. 3. As a student of law, I would like to give technical answer to the best of my ability to the question asked by The Honourable Judge - "How can a person approach a court for direction to the government officials based on some directive issued by DGP which were not adhered to by another official under DGP?" Ans - If there is incorrect use of the discretionary powers by a government officials, a person may approach The Honourable Court for a remedy by filing a writ of mandamus.
The Judge has been asking the lawyer what provisions of the act or statute has been violated by the DGP .But the lawyer has been repeating throughout that the DGP has violated section10 of Bihar police Act 2007.But what's section 10 of the Bihar police Act 2007, the lawyer must read out in the court.Very sad he doesn't have the minimum knowledge of how to proceed in a High COURT
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
Bro that judge was remarkably patient. He shouldn’t have yelled, but the lawyer must be held accountable for being unprofessional, violating the fiduciary duty he owes to whoever he is representing. But yes, if the DGP’s circular has the force of subordinate legislation and the officer under him was ultra vires the circular, Article 14 would be violated and a mandamus can be asked for
Judges are human beings too. I think he seems to have been affected by the number of imposters and frauds that he has to deal with on a daily basis. It has become hard for him to be able to trust anyone. That is why the judge is trying to set examples on any such account. I sympathize with him.
@@BansalHirdyansh It seems you don't understand the basic work ethics, Jab ek lawyer ko itni simple baat samajh nahi ayegi to Judge ka time waste jata hai.
The lawer is irritating, not replying to judges question.. I think the judge asked atleast 5-6 times.. Shut up nahin bolte to lawyer lordship lordship karta rahta...
Advocate fault He doesn’t remember the section totally unprepared in front of the judges Law is above dgp police Any directive circular has no such merit in the court Law is above all I bow down to the lordship rightly said in the end
The lawyer was showing the order of police DGP again and again while he should have read the act regarding the matter. Honorable Judge tried him to understand but he didn't. That's why it's happened. That was right by the Honorable Judge to be threatened lawyer.
May be! But judge should not act like M TV Raghu, otherwise we can make Roadies Raghu as a judge as well...He could've politely said, we dont want to hear it again and again..And admonished the lawyer for coming not prepared in polite manner.
People are commenting based on their knowledge. The lawyer needs to know the CPC which is a procedural law for courts to follow. When the judge asks a question the lawyer has to answer it to the point and not beat round the bush. Lawyers are only interest in money. Any normal reading of plaints for a case gives away the intentions of the lawyer. The supreme Court has also asked the bar council to redraft the law courses. Moreover this is a divisional bench so the waisting of court's time counts
100%sub case ko wakil more day more money ka principle rakh ke court me case ka ambar laga ke rakhe hue hai ispar sub judge prasasnik adhikari ya SDM ko dhyan dena chahiye
Yeh Hain BIMARU states ke lawyers. Get a case in a decade and keep stretching it like chewing gum. I'm pretty sure that the lawyer was very well aware that the case will be tossed out. Just that he might not have expected such a sharp reaction from the judge. This lawyer will keep on trying his best to elongate the case.
It's called checks and balances. Each branch of government checks on each other to maintain the separation of equal power. For example, the judiciary can check the executive and legislative via judicial review. But the main goal of all of this is to safeguard the independence of the judiciary from any interference.
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
So in simple what I understood is lawyer was highlighting the rules laid down by igp where judges were trying to explain the lawyer that his rules doesn't effect the court in anyway...the judge warned once but this lawyer didn't get the warned messages well...when the lawyer spoke about igp for second time judge lashed out at him like Roadies raghu 😂
These videos have spread immense info and many could see how even judges could react.. Judge should have shown restraint but outburst.. Lawyers bhi Apna ghar chalate hai they have no luxury to choose cases as per their choices.
It can be necessary though if the lawyer repeats the same mistake over and over again. The judges have to ensure that they can give their judgements and get the case done. With the lawyer being incompetent, it is only slowing down the judicial process.
@@legally.malaysian There is a bar council for that and fine's can be issued for that . Shout is not the way . if shouting is fine then every industry is ok with it and perform against their employee's . For everything there is a fine or simply removing them from a job or suspension can be done .
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
I think the judge should not be so arrogant. If the lawyer didnt came prepared, the judge could reject the appeal. The lawyer mentioned the section which was in the circular. The judge shoukd have asked the court staff to take.a printout of the mentioned section.
Idiots who don't know law are commenting on the deameanour of the judge and didn't realise that more than 5 times the judge has said the same thing that they cannot pass the order as they are not under the dgp but that advocate kept repeating the same thing like 10 times and wasted precious time of the court. You need to understand this is high court not your home friendly grievance redressal forum. Before standing there you need to know law, need to have etiquettes.
Agreed. If you are telling the person the same thing for more than 5 to 10 times and being a lawyer the other person cannot understand then judge's reaction although very crude, it is not unwarranted.
A judge says to an advocate shut up, very peculiar,,,bar association is silent,may be argument will be wrong, but this is unbecoming of a judge, unfortunate
What kind of substandard lawyer in Patna High court we don't understand.Does not understand the abc of Law .Very sorry state of affairs of the lawyers in patna
A Judge can't be that much rude! Complain should be logged against the judge to the supreme court for his unprofessional attitude. If a petition can't be honored the simple thing to do for a judge to reject with an apology; Not by intimidating the lawyer. Very dark side of the Indian judicial system!
If the lawyer shuts up, how can he present his case. If the arguement is bad, let the judges reject and give verdict against his client. How correct for a judge to stop talking in a place where the talking is a major tool of the profession
Under no circumstances should the judge have used words like "shut up" in that tone. In fact someone who cannot control his emotions in such a manner has no business being in such an exalted position.
Please see the circumstances under which the judge literally lost his cool... The judge is repeatedly telling the counsel to read section 10 from the police act per se and not the findings of DGP.. Still the idiot counsel is repeatedly annoyingly quoting the DGP... For a judge who is delaing with hundreds of cases daily.. It is not uncommon to get triggered by this irritating act of the counsel
Brother understand the situation. Honorable Judge once calmly told they are not computers, then also you trying to do Irrelevant argument then what will happen.
The Advocate is totally unprepared and did not even bring the Act on the provisions of which he is relying! The Learned Judges warned him that they may react. And they did and how!
Judge Position is a very responsible position. Judges sud not behave like any common man, they sud behave professionally wid Respect,Calm & Leadership manner bt here the behaviour is not sending a good /positive Message to the society
If you understand how many cases are there in each state’s high court system, include ones that are pressing and urgent that get delayed and pushed back due to such incompetent lawyers you will understand why the judge has the need to shout. Every min of a judge’s active time matters a lot since they could be ruling on a murder/land grabbing/matters of life and death, while cases where lawyers are unprepared and wasting a courts time pushes such cases back and eventually the judges are transferred to a different state bench and the important cases get pushed back even further.
As per my understanding Judges and Layers hold different positions and responsibilities but on the same subject so none is superior than other. But if a Judge looses his temper, then something somewhere in not correct. In such cases who will make it correct ✅????
Isnt there a laptop or something where the judge can pull up the relevant section ? From my understanding this issue is because the lawyer is stating a section but not explaining what it contains and therefore the judge cannot pass ruling as he doesn't know what he is talking about
Not done full Home Work. Looks like a case of Writ of Certiorari which is issued by High Courts or the Supreme Court to quash the order passed by an inferior court or tribunal after hearing. Mandamus is issued to question the Validity / Authority / Source of Power of the Executive order. But internal administrative matters on the Executive side such as Promoton Transfers and Postings ( herein by DGP , unless established to be done mala fide) are a touchy and thorny issue to many Courts. Similar is the issue of Payscale parity cases, i.e., equal work for equal pay , which has great financial budgetsry ramifications for the Executive side if order is issued by Court. Normally Courts order the Executive to conduct Work Study, Cadre Review etc., and dispose the cases as such.
If AI ever relpaces human jobs, the Indian judiciary should be on top of that list probably at #1 spot. These judges enjoy best perks, salaries and max vacations and still only interested in showing their supremacy than working productively.
To be honest, he has a right to say that. In court, no matter which judge is presiding over the case, you will be subjected to scolding and criticisms from them. So it is the duty of the lawyers to act competently and provide sufficient and valid evidence in their case.
@@legally.malaysianto be honest he has no right to shout like that , but the law is yet weak as to guide or limit a the jurisdiction for the behaviour of a judge , how a judge should act in a court of law.
Such shouting by the Judge is most pathetic and certainly uncalled for ? The CJI should definitely take some cognisance and do something about such episodes repeating. Why can’t the judges just passed the order of they’re not convinced by the submission of any advocate instead of shouting in such manner. Very pathetic to watch such shouting by the judge. Tarrikh Pe Taarikh देते रहो और इनका कोई कुछ भी नहीं कर सकता है । Such a shame … “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied”
Maybe this lawyer is unprepared, incompetent or maybe he brought up this issue in a wrong way, form or manner altogether, the case can be politely and lawfully dismissed/rejected. The demeanor of this judge is completely unprofessional, unnecessary, unbecoming of a judge and uncalled for. Why do you have to be an arrogant d*ckhead just because you are elevated to a high status in your career? Such arrogance, pride and egotastic mindset are most often seen among legal practitioners, be it a judge or a lawyer. At the end of the day, any profession under the government's pay is 'for the service of the people'. Please be polite and professional.
advocate is wrong,judge is asking him again and again the section of law, advocate is just talking rubbish, he is just strching case, advocate ko law nahi pata... judge is right...advocate bar bar passover mang raha hai, advocate farzi hai...judge is aking him law..judge is right...
This is because he can not understand English and these rules to explain case in english is just aweful in India where we are fitting for Hindi to be our mother tongue
Classic example of "if you cannot convince them ,confuse them." 😂
Then you don't get the relief. Keeping it simple is the way to go.
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
@@keshavmaskara4715भाई साहब, तो आप बन जाय 😁
My prima-facie opinion based on the portion shown in this video:-
1. No doubt that the lawyer came unprepared. But the Lawyer is also an officer of The court. The lawyer was extremely polite. If The Honourable Court itself abuses its officers by yelling at them, it will create an atmosphere of fear. Hence the way The Honourable Judge shouted at the lawyer is completely uncalled for & inhumane.
2. It's easier to remove a Prime Minister from his post than a High Court or Supreme Court judge. A High Court judge can be removed from the post only through an impeachment in the Parliament. Thus High Court Judges are vested with huge power & are well protected. So such power has to come with sense of humility. In my opinion, this judge needs to be sensitized by The Honourable Chief Justice of India on controlling his anger.
3. As a student of law, I would like to give technical answer to the best of my ability to the question asked by The Honourable Judge - "How can a person approach a court for direction to the government officials based on some directive issued by DGP which were not adhered to by another official under DGP?" Ans - If there is incorrect use of the discretionary powers by a government officials, a person may approach The Honourable Court for a remedy by filing a writ of mandamus.
The Judge has been asking the lawyer what provisions of the act or statute has been violated by the DGP .But the lawyer has been repeating throughout that the DGP has violated section10 of Bihar police Act 2007.But what's section 10 of the Bihar police Act 2007, the lawyer must read out in the court.Very sad he doesn't have the minimum knowledge of how to proceed in a High COURT
Be very careful... Or else you are gonna go to jail for contempt of court....
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
Bro that judge was remarkably patient. He shouldn’t have yelled, but the lawyer must be held accountable for being unprofessional, violating the fiduciary duty he owes to whoever he is representing.
But yes, if the DGP’s circular has the force of subordinate legislation and the officer under him was ultra vires the circular, Article 14 would be violated and a mandamus can be asked for
@@keshavmaskara4715 most of lawyers r like that only. Mental fools. How they became lawyer I cannot understand
Judges are human beings too.
I think he seems to have been affected by the number of imposters and frauds that he has to deal with on a daily basis. It has become hard for him to be able to trust anyone. That is why the judge is trying to set examples on any such account. I sympathize with him.
judge bhi toh bihar mai work raha hai felling sed
1000 of cases pending Indian courts because of such kind of lawyers.
bro vo lawyers nahi judge ki wajahase hote hai do some research
@@BansalHirdyansh It seems you don't understand the basic work ethics, Jab ek lawyer ko itni simple baat samajh nahi ayegi to Judge ka time waste jata hai.
@@sunil0081 per agar case court mai he naho aayega tho ganta kuch hoga
@@BansalHirdyansh you do some research and have some common sense
The lawer is irritating, not replying to judges question..
I think the judge asked atleast 5-6 times..
Shut up nahin bolte to lawyer lordship lordship karta rahta...
Advocate fault
He doesn’t remember the section totally unprepared in front of the judges
Law is above dgp police
Any directive circular has no such merit in the court
Law is above all
I bow down to the lordship rightly said in the end
DGP's circular has zero value before the court....
The individual came unprepared and draft seems inconclusive.
The lawyer was showing the order of police DGP again and again while he should have read the act regarding the matter. Honorable Judge tried him to understand but he didn't. That's why it's happened. That was right by the Honorable Judge to be threatened lawyer.
First write the correct spelling of JUDGE 😂
@@payment-g5g Man is made to be mistaken but blunder is not allowed 😅
May be! But judge should not act like M TV Raghu, otherwise we can make Roadies Raghu as a judge as well...He could've politely said, we dont want to hear it again and again..And admonished the lawyer for coming not prepared in polite manner.
Lawyer be like- Maine nahi bola ke wo bola. Maine bola ke wo bola 😂😂 rajpal yadav.
This lawyer deserves a meme 😂
हुई हुई हुई 😂😂😂
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
People are commenting based on their knowledge.
The lawyer needs to know the CPC which is a procedural law for courts to follow.
When the judge asks a question the lawyer has to answer it to the point and not beat round the bush.
Lawyers are only interest in money.
Any normal reading of plaints for a case gives away the intentions of the lawyer.
The supreme Court has also asked the bar council to redraft the law courses.
Moreover this is a divisional bench so the waisting of court's time counts
But still judges need to be professional
100%sub case ko wakil more day more money ka principle rakh ke court me case ka ambar laga ke rakhe hue hai ispar sub judge prasasnik adhikari ya SDM ko dhyan dena chahiye
@I am Sorry they are also trained to be professional
@@freedom5941 phir tum bologe “cases not completed in time” “judges are incompetent”
@@finevinestv8839 honge toh bolenge
Yeh Hain BIMARU states ke lawyers. Get a case in a decade and keep stretching it like chewing gum. I'm pretty sure that the lawyer was very well aware that the case will be tossed out. Just that he might not have expected such a sharp reaction from the judge. This lawyer will keep on trying his best to elongate the case.
😂😂😂
People want judicial interference in all administrative decisions. It's creating unnecessary burden on courts. Judges are human too
if administrative policies required judicial interference then what is the meaning of efficient policy making
It's called checks and balances. Each branch of government checks on each other to maintain the separation of equal power. For example, the judiciary can check the executive and legislative via judicial review. But the main goal of all of this is to safeguard the independence of the judiciary from any interference.
Judges are human but advocates are animals ?
how did this lawyer survive this long in his career
Through a combination of "extremely sorry" and "bow down".
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
He's buying time for a losing case , every hearing earns him@@keshavmaskara4715
Bihari hai. That's why shameless
At last the council forgot to smile😂
So in simple what I understood is lawyer was highlighting the rules laid down by igp where judges were trying to explain the lawyer that his rules doesn't effect the court in anyway...the judge warned once but this lawyer didn't get the warned messages well...when the lawyer spoke about igp for second time judge lashed out at him like Roadies raghu 😂
These videos have spread immense info and many could see how even judges could react..
Judge should have shown restraint but outburst..
Lawyers bhi Apna ghar chalate hai they have no luxury to choose cases as per their choices.
senseless, not answering the question put by hon, judge.
Judge discussing "kya bol rha ha ye".
Respect of bar and bench is necessary ' this is a court which comes under Indian constitution. Shouting by judge is not appreciated.
If the judge didn't shout the lawyer would keep saying the same thing over and over again.
It can be necessary though if the lawyer repeats the same mistake over and over again. The judges have to ensure that they can give their judgements and get the case done. With the lawyer being incompetent, it is only slowing down the judicial process.
@@legally.malaysian There is a bar council for that and fine's can be issued for that . Shout is not the way . if shouting is fine then every industry is ok with it and perform against their employee's . For everything there is a fine or simply removing them from a job or suspension can be done .
Headphone users lol😂
🎧💀
The lawyer seems like a mental fool showing his teeth after every sentence unnecessarily. It shows he is doing nothing but wasting time of the court by not being clear and straight forward with his argument. Just look at his attitude tilting his head sideways and smiling like a fool. I mean i would be annoyed as hell if someone behaved that way. What a fool this lawyer is and just looking at this video made me angry.
Ara kitna comment karoga bhai
0:55 Judge delivered some gases🤣🤣😂😂
0:55 judge passed gas from side 😂
Please show some respect and comment with some dignity this is not a comedy video
You look obsessed with that, weird likings you have 😂
@@amitpatil2421 😂 kuch bhi ...
@@zionmoses1839 😂😂😂
@@amitpatil2421 Judge delivered some f!rts😂
The argument may be absurd, wrong, or out of the procedure, all agreed. India is the heaven of Advocacy.
I think the judge should not be so arrogant. If the lawyer didnt came prepared, the judge could reject the appeal. The lawyer mentioned the section which was in the circular. The judge shoukd have asked the court staff to take.a printout of the mentioned section.
THANKS !
Idiots who don't know law are commenting on the deameanour of the judge and didn't realise that more than 5 times the judge has said the same thing that they cannot pass the order as they are not under the dgp but that advocate kept repeating the same thing like 10 times and wasted precious time of the court. You need to understand this is high court not your home friendly grievance redressal forum. Before standing there you need to know law, need to have etiquettes.
Agreed. If you are telling the person the same thing for more than 5 to 10 times and being a lawyer the other person cannot understand then judge's reaction although very crude, it is not unwarranted.
Fully agree, the lawyer was irritating.
senseless, advocate.
@@adityadwivedi7672 why don’t you become a judge then, we need more of emotionally driven judges in this country
@@adityadwivedi7672 oh no, we lost a gem but let me tell you if you ever want to get into Judiciary let me know I will be there to cheer you
Thanks God, experience counts!
With this temperament he is not suitable for the CHAIR.
Lawyer nailed it by saying "Highly Obliged"
Even after so many warnings lawyer isn’t getting any clue and only smiling
A judge says to an advocate shut up, very peculiar,,,bar association is silent,may be argument will be wrong, but this is unbecoming of a judge, unfortunate
What kind of substandard lawyer in Patna High court we don't understand.Does not understand the abc of Law .Very sorry state of affairs of the lawyers in patna
Indeed and Govt is not doing anything about it.
A Judge can't be that much rude! Complain should be logged against the judge to the supreme court for his unprofessional attitude. If a petition can't be honored the simple thing to do for a judge to reject with an apology; Not by intimidating the lawyer. Very dark side of the Indian judicial system!
I agree with you, me i from pakistan
Stern action is the need of the hour for counsels like these , Justice Chakradhari did right.
Can you expect a judge to shout? According to Indian constitution such judges are to be subjected to judicial analysis n removed
If the lawyer shuts up, how can he present his case. If the arguement is bad, let the judges reject and give verdict against his client. How correct for a judge to stop talking in a place where the talking is a major tool of the profession
Under no circumstances should the judge have used words like "shut up" in that tone. In fact someone who cannot control his emotions in such a manner has no business being in such an exalted position.
They don't have to go through a personality test
Please see the circumstances under which the judge literally lost his cool... The judge is repeatedly telling the counsel to read section 10 from the police act per se and not the findings of DGP.. Still the idiot counsel is repeatedly annoyingly quoting the DGP... For a judge who is delaing with hundreds of cases daily.. It is not uncommon to get triggered by this irritating act of the counsel
They definitely can. A person in power can definitely correct the course in a manner they see fit for the mischievous ones.
@@Swatimoon25 some people like to kowtow before the better off
Brother understand the situation.
Honorable Judge once calmly told they are not computers, then also you trying to do Irrelevant argument then what will happen.
A judge should not shout to an advocate. Advocates are not slaves of a judge. Without advocates there is no court.
Attorney sits there with a smirk that is asking for trouble from the Court.
Very bad argument in the court before such an intelligent and senior judge of the patna high court😮😡🤦
Judge should not shout like that it's a violation he can sue the judge he can complain in the bar.
Advocate laugh provoked the beast of judge...
The Advocate is totally unprepared and did not even bring the Act on the provisions of which he is relying!
The Learned Judges warned him that they may react. And they did and how!
Judge Position is a very responsible position. Judges sud not behave like any common man, they sud behave professionally wid Respect,Calm & Leadership manner bt here the behaviour is not sending a good /positive Message to the society
7:56
Reminded me of my dad Scolding me (Edit... Teaching me Discipline❤)
Those were the days
Missing them already😊
Totally bad reaction by a judge. Absolutely inappropriate.
Wow, nice words
Judge is stupid, there should be some authority over judges too
It seems that the judge knows nothing about the law that's why he is reacting in such a manner
I'm imagining how would he have faced his client after this trial 😂😂
If you understand how many cases are there in each state’s high court system, include ones that are pressing and urgent that get delayed and pushed back due to such incompetent lawyers you will understand why the judge has the need to shout. Every min of a judge’s active time matters a lot since they could be ruling on a murder/land grabbing/matters of life and death, while cases where lawyers are unprepared and wasting a courts time pushes such cases back and eventually the judges are transferred to a different state bench and the important cases get pushed back even further.
Why the hell is he behaving that way?? Can someone please answer??
frustration
@@lazypops3117 not the judge but the lawyer ...... why the hell is he behaving in an insane way...... tilting his head and smiling??? Whyyyyyy???!!!!
In any circumstances is incorrect, UNDER any circumstances stances is correct
The Judge seems to have a poor grasp on the concept of wtit of mandamus
Why they use my lord word in every sentenace.
As per my understanding Judges and Layers hold different positions and responsibilities but on the same subject so none is superior than other. But if a Judge looses his temper, then something somewhere in not correct.
In such cases who will make it correct ✅????
03:34 is the lady lawyer sleep
Such a level of observation skills man 😅but yes you are correct.
Isnt there a laptop or something where the judge can pull up the relevant section ? From my understanding this issue is because the lawyer is stating a section but not explaining what it contains and therefore the judge cannot pass ruling as he doesn't know what he is talking about
Horrible behaviour …but many ppl behave like that.
thumbnail best. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not done full Home Work. Looks like a case of Writ of Certiorari which is issued by High Courts or the Supreme Court to quash the order passed by an inferior court or tribunal after hearing. Mandamus is issued to question the Validity / Authority / Source of Power of the Executive order. But internal administrative matters on the Executive side such as Promoton Transfers and Postings ( herein by DGP , unless established to be done mala fide) are a touchy and thorny issue to many Courts. Similar is the issue of Payscale parity cases, i.e., equal work for equal pay , which has great financial budgetsry ramifications for the Executive side if order is issued by Court. Normally Courts order the Executive to conduct Work Study, Cadre Review etc., and dispose the cases as such.
Bad Preparation & Bad Reaction.
Very irritating Lawyer.
This all foolish things happen in पटना HC only.
The counsel looks like P. Sathasivam retired judge of Supreme Court and later governor of Kerala.
If AI ever relpaces human jobs, the Indian judiciary should be on top of that list probably at #1 spot.
These judges enjoy best perks, salaries and max vacations and still only interested in showing their supremacy than working productively.
Is there any judgement video for this case??
Why the judge is shouting has he gon mad ??
Kahan chali gayi sari hassi
Judiciary is the only thing that differentiate between non human and human.
Even Dharmasthala Nirbhaya brutal gang rape and murder also be the same kind of argument by the advocate because of drag the case
लायर कितना अच्छा इस्माइल दे रहे है 😂
Incompetent Lawyer
Though the council is irrectating through his arguments, yet honerable judge should angry but should not shout like this.
To be honest, he has a right to say that. In court, no matter which judge is presiding over the case, you will be subjected to scolding and criticisms from them. So it is the duty of the lawyers to act competently and provide sufficient and valid evidence in their case.
@@legally.malaysianto be honest he has no right to shout like that , but the law is yet weak as to guide or limit a the jurisdiction for the behaviour of a judge , how a judge should act in a court of law.
Judges should off the mices,while doing discussions.
There should be some system in courts in our legal system to monitor judges for their accountability and behaviour
Shouting by judge is not appreciated
Judge is justified in shutting up this lawyer
Excellent and great Judge.
Lawyer is smiling stupidly
Very bad reaction by Court. Very bad.
Reaction was according to the action. The counsel was advised and warned multiple times.
Looks like the counsel is quite a thick skin.
Imagine if someone f!rts in this court room 😭😂
OMG
01:03 did some one farted😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂out of nervousness 😂😂
Terrible lawyer and a horrible judge.
Fake advocate.... License must b verified....
सभ्य वकील, असभ्य जज
Such shouting by the Judge is most pathetic and certainly uncalled for ?
The CJI should definitely take some cognisance and do something about such episodes repeating.
Why can’t the judges just passed the order of they’re not convinced by the submission of any advocate instead of shouting in such manner.
Very pathetic to watch such shouting by the judge.
Tarrikh Pe Taarikh देते रहो और इनका कोई कुछ भी नहीं कर सकता है ।
Such a shame …
“Justice Delayed is Justice Denied”
Maybe this lawyer is unprepared, incompetent or maybe he brought up this issue in a wrong way, form or manner altogether, the case can be politely and lawfully dismissed/rejected. The demeanor of this judge is completely unprofessional, unnecessary, unbecoming of a judge and uncalled for. Why do you have to be an arrogant d*ckhead just because you are elevated to a high status in your career? Such arrogance, pride and egotastic mindset are most often seen among legal practitioners, be it a judge or a lawyer. At the end of the day, any profession under the government's pay is 'for the service of the people'. Please be polite and professional.
7:55
Kindly have a look of is incorrect, ....correct is have a look AT
Very bad
Judges can't shout 'Shut Up' to the Officers of the Court.
Parliament mein vidhuri gaaliyan deta hai, tho koi kuch nahi karta...
advocate is wrong,judge is asking him again and again the section of law, advocate is just talking rubbish, he is just strching case, advocate ko law nahi pata... judge is right...advocate bar bar passover mang raha hai, advocate farzi hai...judge is aking him law..judge is right...
This is because he can not understand English and these rules to explain case in english is just aweful in India where we are fitting for Hindi to be our mother tongue
They are not LORD
Nahi toh kya.. Chomu chau chau karrha hai.. Lawyer jaise behave nahi karrha hai