WATCH LIVE: Obsessed Ex-Boyfriend Murder Trial - WI v. Zachariah Anderson - Day 15
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 мар 2023
- Wisconsin man Zachariah Anderson faces trial for charges in connection with the disappearance and death of Rosalio Gutierrez, Jr. in May 2020. Anderson is charged with first-degree intentional homicide, hiding a corpse, and stalking. Prosecutors allege Anderson stalked his ex-girlfriend and killed her new love interest, Gutierrez, at his Kenosha apartment. Anderson is back on trial after a judge declared a mistrial last year after only two days of testimony. Gutierrez's body has never been found.
#MurderTrial #Court #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
That closing argument from the prosecutor was masterfully delivered 👏🏼
The only thing that hangs me up is how did he get RG’s body out of the apartment by himself, with no one seeing him, and no traces of blood?
I think someone helped him. And then the defense trying to blame Sadie and Macias for killing him, I thought how the heck would either of those women be able to take him out of the house
Wow! Those last 10 min of closing arguments were fantastic! She wrapped that up with a bow 🎀
@Mory yes she did....... right to jail!
Does the defense lawyer realize how idiotic he sounds saying Zach was worried about his kids safety and that's why he did all of this? Pathetic defense
He did look Rosalio’s records. Which he had…
Exactly…as he threatens his young child with a gun
Well, I think the Defense lawyers are somewhat desperate. Never the custody of the kids, that were raised by their mom for many years whiteout their father’s financial support, was discussed. Zac, worried by his diminished lack of control, raised this issue as a tool to unerve his ex-wife. Only a lawyer not versed with the domestic violence dynamics would try this argument.
It sounds completely reasonable to me. It is the prosecution that have stretched the fabric of reality to try to implicate Zach for a crime not only is it clear he did not commit but it isn't even clear that Rosalio is deceased, like his father and niece, Rosalio is still considered a missing person.
Good point
Dad's lawyers calling his daughter a liar is not helpful for him.
“This dot” of RGs blood in ZAs van… how.? Explain that
He can’t take the prosecutor talking about him looming over Sadie at 4 a.m. and calling her and babysitter a bad name...that look in this eyes and he started to say something, then leaned into the man defense attorney. Love it!!! Tearing him up Prosecutor!!!
@@eddiereini5419 ?
⏰ Timestamps for day 15⏰
19:34 - OPJ
23:24 - Jury brought in and given the layout of the remaining ‘to do list’
24:44 - Prosecution’s beginning closing argument by District Attorney Michael Gravely
1:53:57 - Break
1:55:21 - Defense Closing Arguments by Attorney Kirk Obear
3:07:43 - Final Closing Arguments by ADA Jessica Krejcarek
3:24:56 - Judge addresses the Jury before they begin deliberating
3:27:27 - Mr Anderson draws a name for the juror to be released
I guess I wasn’t listening..lol. Why were they drawing a name for a juror to be released?
You are AMAZING with all your timestamp comments
I wish these would be pinned at the top. Thank you!
Yeah, thank you for taking the time to do this, hopefully more people will recognize as well. 👍✌️
Thnx
When you look into this defendant 's eyes there is absolutely nothing there, nothing. You see no remorse, no regret, no regret, no sadness when his daughter was testifying, nothing. A soulless, Godless, shell of a nothing!!
There have been times his eyes look glazed. Wonder if he is on medication to keep him calm.
Hexwas actually upset when they daughter cried. They are told to show no emotion.
And in prison thats the face they have inside,you dont show emotion.
Because his innocent
@@Williams370 If he's innocencet he sure did a good job of making himself look guilty. He didn't only do one thing. I don't think it was a coincidence he burned up clothes in the burn pile
right after Rosalio went missing.
@@Williams370 And why is RG’s blood in Z’s van? And why would the carpet be cut out? Etc.
When she said you have to swear the bailiffs and the judge yelled THANK YOU😂😂
Was he being salty towards her, or genuinely thanking her?? I thought she was great, and it felt awkward when he snapped at her...lol
What time stamp is that?
@@CharlieGoldenYT About one minute b4 it ends...maybe 3:35
That was crazy lol
@@Cher_a_Smile I agree! It was very awkward, idk his intentions but it was mean😭
I'm just happy I didn't have to listen to the female defense attorney any more. Something about her robotic tone, strange inflections and dead fish stare really annoyed me every time she spoke...
I am pretty sure I will get beat up for saying this but am I the only one who found the female defense attorneys low cut shirt showing cleavage inappropriate for court ???
@@gailventzke2085 I did thought she looked under dressed foe court could not stand that cold look of hers and that annoying voice 😡😡
I agree with the first comment. The female defence attorney obviously has qualifications but it is hard to believe, listening to her blah blah blah.
@@gailventzke2085 No, I noticed it right off and was appalled!
@@charrielyn1231 I was too. Soooo inappropriate. What was she thinking?
Thank you again Addi for your hard work.
This closing is horrible so far lol
Addi?
@@Sunn777 she is the one organizing the video link, I think.
@@Sunn777 Addi is one of the Admin / Moderators for the live chat. All the moderators throughout the trial have been great.
I don't think zacy is very happy with his defences closing... What a mixed up mess that lost me so many times I need an amazon tracker..
Zach has one lol
@@eileenrobbins8105 Zach has two! Lol
I see what you did there! 😂
@@321_Relax only one! They didn’t find the second
The secondary prosecution closing arguments were so strong. Passionate, succinct and simple. Credit to her. Even Anderson looked rattled.
@Jess I agree she nailed it!
I saw this comment prior to seeing rebuttal so was excited to hear it. Sadly I was VERY disappointed. She sucked! Not good at all.
@@InLieuTube It would make them look bad in front of the jury. Not worth it for a few extra minutes the judge imposed on them with no real notice.
@@InLieuTube The judge sucks. I’ve never seen a judge behave like him. So unprofessional. He also just doesn’t apply the law and bases his rulings on his interpretation/opinion of the law. He shouldn’t be able to practice any longer
@@caitbarton4616 I could’ve sworn he said yesterday that they’d have no time limit…? So I didn’t understand his sass 💁🏻♀️
You guys doing great work on reporting!
Omg, the prosector had to remind the judge to swear in the bailiff before the jury starts deliberating?….he needs to retire immediately following this case. He’s the one at fault for this trial going on way past the 2 weeks they thought it would take. His uhhhhhhh, uhhhhhhh, taking forever to spit out what he wants say….good grief.
Thanks for getting this back ASAP 🙌🏻
The jurors name was still mentioned so I don't know what the point of the live video was
Who wears such a low cut blouse to closing arguments at a murder trial? Different agenda than professionally defending your client?
The face of the woman defense person while the prosecutor is speaking is so perfect. She knows it is the end of the trial and goodbye Zach baby!
The look of doom 😂
Yes she looks defeated...looking her up and down.
Cleavage in the courtroom is inappropriate
Prosecution did a great job of wrapping up a roller coaster of a trial. After hearing both closing arguments I’m convinced: GUILTY
Right yes! Agreed
I was convinced after the opening statements he was obviously guilty.
Any accomplices?
Did LE investigate baby mamma?
@@workhorse7134Did you wait to hear if the defense presented reasonable doubt?
I have watched this trial. After the opening statements I thought if the State can prove every claim put forth it would be a compelling case. IMO they did that. The totality of the evidence tells a very complete story. Closing arguments tied everything together neatly. Jessica Krejcarek did so much in the last ten minutes. I would comfortably vote guilty. I will add I am not "man bun thirsty", as so many women seem to be. I'm sure Zack will have plenty of pen pals. And yes, Ms Muller should read the pamphlet on "dress code for attorneys" and probably stick to DUIs. The trial was a hot mess in so many ways but in the end, Guilty.
Agree. I did not like her & im sure jurors didn’t. That doesn’t help her client at all- the low cut dressing is disgusting
I also noticed after the daughter's testimony she did not cross or question as often. Seems like she failed miserably and the more senior attorneys took over.
@@NeverNotCleaning I noticed that too, she finally got put in her place and blew it and so they took it from there
On point!
Prosecution lied
How'd his blood end up in the van if it's "the wrong guy"!? IMO
EXACTLY
He's not the wrong guy is why
Do you think (guilty) defendants sit there thinking how right/wrong the cops/DA got the info?
Lol, I absolutely do! That’s where my mind went when the DA was outlining the murder and the clean up.
I hope the jury realizes they must sleep at night the rest of their life. That’s what I wonder if each jury member thinks about. They can’t go back and change their decision.
I’ve always wondered this myself!
IMO, I think Zachariah must be medicated with benzodiazepines at the request of his lawyers. Explaining his sometimes fixated stare. Also allowing him to sleep. Otherwise…
@@louiselefrancois-mq1chlol…. You r so funny! Lol…
Why did they not let Muller, who knew the case inside out do closing, this guy isn't even confident in what he is saying?
Probably thought it was best to have a soft spoken attorney do the closing to juxtapose the DA's yelling voice. Incase any jury members were put off by her, it's best they let another attorney do it. He's a former JAG with a cool head - she might get too expressive. He's more experienced. He has been one of the attorneys the whole time and was sitting there listening the whole trial - they probably planned from the start that he'd do closing.
Not sure how anyone could watch this trial and think he was anything but guilty? If he couldn’t have her, no one could.
Same.
Agree, absolutely. Sadistic sociopath with narcissistic traits. Just saying.
Not guilty. My gut is never wrong. You can check yours.
@@luchiayoung I’ll be back when the verdict is in to tell you you’re wrong.
@@luchiayoung OMG! So funny. I have 35 years experience analyzing neuropsychological files and working with forensic experts. And, well, named Googloo by my coworkers because so very few times wrong. So, well, good luck. Times will tell.
Prosecutor 2nd closing killed it case CLOSED
She’s the best. So organized.
@@InLieuTube well actually, he limited her to ten minutes because of a doctor previous appointment he had.
No she didn’t. Stop hyping people up. She sucked.
Agree. Thought she was excellent! Wish she’d done the whole closing tbh
How many times can a DA say “maybe” and not expect some reasonable doubt?
Meeting the kids IS a Big step plus she didn't know about anyone else
The defense is ridiculous saying there's no evidence... please
She should have waited much longer. 12 weeks is too fast kids don't need to be a part of something that's not permanent
@@celticwarrior777 she's not on trial for meeting his kids. There are people that meet and after a few weeks, days hours have formed a relationship that lasts the rest of their lives. Then there are people that are together for years before making life time commitments that end shortly after. The majority of the people commenting have made bad decisions when it comes to affairs of the heart. Now let's get back to this being a trial about murder and stalking. Victim blaming is never good
Worst defense attorney ever! She is beyond annoying 😈😈😈😈😈
Wow guilty on all charges! I personally believed he was but didn't think there was strong enough evidence to convict him. I'm happy for the victims family but feel so bad for his ex and thier children that's tough
Prayers that his family gets JUSTICE. This has been an incredible amount for mom to go through! Blessings 💜
Has it though, or is that what she wishes us to perceive? Lots of threats from her side remember.
@@victorialawgeek81cornwell64 The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming re; ZA. Threats from SB are just that, threats. If they had any circumstantial or physical evidence it was SB, they would of arrested her and she would be on trial.
Thank you for helping me see that. It’s so hard this case. He got Guilty and tbh I think that was the right decision, whether new evidence will come out years down the line, who knows, I think he will confess at some point to someone, but not just to a fellow inmate. Maybe his daughter in years to come. He owes her that.
@@victorialawgeek81cornwell64 I agree…I believe both him and SB were very two toxic people together and apparently apart. I do believe that SB was a manipulator regarding ZA and her own children. Sad, all the way around.
The time for him to talk would have been BEFORE sentencing. He knows where RG remains are. He should have used that to leverage a better sentence.
His arrogance and insistence that he’s innocent cost him a bunch of time.
He belongs in prison forever and his silence keeps him there:
When the prosecutor was talking about him putting OA up to calling someone and telling them they were home alone the prosecutor says what kinda parent does that ZA mouthed toward the jury Sadie not once but twice. This guy is dangerous and hopefully for Sadie and the kids he gets put away for a long time.
He was blatantly responding/reacting to a lot of the closing. I wish I knew how to read lips.
And the gaslighting continues. ZA is a narcissistic psychopath.
Him bringing up the relationship is not as serious as the prosecution made it out to be just makes Zach even more bad. So he did this to a guy who wasn't even serious about her
That’s what blows my mind! This guy wasn’t even as serious with Sadie as she was him otherwise he wouldn’t have been talking and trying to go out with others. I wonder if during trial when that came up what zach was thinking. He basically ruined his life and took the life of someone else who more than likely given the bs going on would have moved on. It’s so heartbreaking
Agree but Zach had no idea Rosalio was interested in dating someone other than Sadie. It must have been really upsetting and embarrassing to Sadie having this disclosed.
@@SJC49 z found a letter in R's car, when he allegedly broke into it, signed by a "DJ" and one of z's texts to S was warning her about it. so it seems he suspected he wasn't that serious about her, and maybe it made him more mad that she wouldn't take him back, but was being treated that way by R (like his behavior wasn't totally disturbing🥴). Maybe he thought if she knew that, she would leave him, and when that didn't work he lost it. Just my opinion anyway!
(and R told S that the letter must have been from a previous owner; so either he was lying to S to hide the other woman/women, or it was a random letter left by the previous owner, who really knows)
It cracks me up how many women in these threads are so desperate to say Zach is innocent. Seriously? Most men who found Jodi Arias hot would be the first to admit she was guilty af.
People hqv3 a right to their opinion stop being sexist
@@celticwarrior777 the irony.
pick mes🤮 if I saw him in a club I would cover my drink, or possibly leave. he is slimy and grimy looking. and he don't clean up well
I’m a female and I agree - I think they might be letting their eyes deceive their brain cells!!!
It was a minority of women who thought he was innocent. Btw, more women than men watch trials, my opinion.
Wait. I thought they didn't find the body? Mr Gravely stated that he was found in the 19th. How can that be?
Because the prosecution team don't care about facts and evidence, they just want a conviction, they don't care if they send an innocent person to jail for a crime he did not commit.
That was def a mis-spoken moment. I believe he meant that was the day the crime scene was discovered.
Wow. Why didn't the judge or the defense say anything when the DA stated that "his body was found on the 19th, 2020?"
Um, What body?
Agree - you could see the female defence attorney caught that. Maybe there is a good reason why they don’t say anything. May be that it would seem petty as it’s obvious the prosecutor misspoke.
Because it makes no difference. Why would the judge say something anyway???
Wow, Prosecutor doing GREAT!!! He’s mapping it all out..TELL THE STORY!!!👏👏👏👏 So much evidence, daughter witness to stalking, blood, disappearance of Victim, on camera buying cleaning supplies and so much more.....anybody who thinks he is innocent is not in their right mind. The faces of the defense attorney and the defendant is priceless. Sitting there listening how he killed a man and can’t speak in denial gotta be frustrating. GUILTY!!! To think of how the victim last moments were is sad. My heart goes out to his family and Sadie and her children too...this hurts all of the families, in some way. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
What blood?
@@Thebeautiful11 Probably referring to what was DEEMED to be blood by 3 expert witnesses in the field (but WAS proven to be the victim’s DNA)
The defense’s closing argument was probably one of the worst closing arguments I have heard. Blah, blah, blah. I’d rather watch paint dry than listen to this guy.
chair was used for that to put him to take him out of apartment
Very clever.
Prove it. It's speculation otherwise.
@@teemyoutube2066 we are just having fun. You know the real court is in Wisconsin, right.
Yep- from Olivia testimony- chair on wheels from the basement!
The excused jurors name was still mentioned out loud 😳
@@InLieuTube The daughter’s name was already mentioned a few times by the mom.
@@tracyevans9012 loving wise mom? ???
So what?
@@luchiayoung Loving father?
Wow - says a lot when your Family doesn’t even attend court for the final arguments! Guilty!
Who is sitting behind the defendant?
"Don't use that language in this courtroom" LOL
I like the assistant district attorney. The Prosecution closing was quite good in exposing a coherent narrative. I predict guilty on three counts. Verdict tomorrow noon. I bet…
Her name is Jessica Krejcarek and she was excellent throughout. I agree, guilty on three of four, not guilty on the stalking of Gutierrez.
@@kylebaldwin8813 I agree
The judge seems to be really snappy at her throughout this trial.
Time for this judge to retire. He spent most of the trial playing on his phone.
The “phone” was his connection to the jury room.
Hhhmmmm…hhhmmmm…hhhmmmmm.hhhmmmm. His reply. 🤣
Gentle Eyes Judge used the landline on the desk to his right to contact the jury room. Holley is talking about his cell which he was on a lot.
Anyone that kills their partner because they can’t “live without them” should just off themselves if that’s the case, what an absolute loser
I reckon he dumped the body on the way to get his taxes ! He cut him up and put in bags, this lawer isn't in caging me to think he didn't do it.
The defense overly stressed he couldn’t do it with a bad back. But turns around and said he continued to work. Also the odds of the dna matching RG family is probably astronomical.. also the way Defense mocks a 12yo girl in a childish voice and sarcasm is sickening. Then they try to smear the victims name by mentioning how many women he talked to. Just gross. They’re trying to distract the jurors.
Defense attorneys are so gross. Not every single one but most.
This is definition of ‘If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.’
Any other of the swipe -right hookups have possible jealous husbands/lovers?
There’s always the “reasonable doubt” gang in the comments.
lmao, they're so embarrassing, they literally will accept any excuse unless there's an actual confession or video evidence. Now that we're in the age of deepfakes, they'll probably start saying you can't trust video evidence either
Both prosecutors did an amazing job in closing...
GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY
This guy is so guilty!! Just a little concerning that the jury still out
Has the jury comeback yet?
No
I know the defendant doesn’t have to do anything to prove his innocence. But it’s just crazy, the defense they even put on. The witnesses didn’t really do much to help prove his innocence. & it’s ironic that he had nobody. Family, friends or employers that could give him an alibi or something to help his innocence! .. and he just sits there like he’s got no care in the world about to fall asleep 🤦♀️
That's a morally-bankrupt slime ball for ya.
His witnesses were so weak. I was shocked!
Excellent closing arguments prosecutors 👏 he’s guilty. I can’t believe he put the children in on his stalking, waking them at 4am, spying, his blood DNA in your car. Who on earth keeps saying not proven 🤦🏾♀️
Exactly! Cuz you know....
Seriously.. there are only a few types of way DNA is deposited. It isn't skin cells, isn't touch DNA, isn't semen.. clearly it's blood common sense people. Guilty AF ! RIP Rosalio 🙏
At the very least he should be prosecuted for burning all his work demolition junk in his garden. Is he not aware that the burn permit only entitles you to burn waste items obtained from your home in Wisconsin. 😄
Wow - maybe they won’t give him another permit - hope this is sarcastic enough!
His hands!!?? Sounds desperate
The judge should instruct the gallery lookie lou's regarding facial expressions and head shaking.
Ok so Kyle Rittenhouse judge was "Bruce Schroeder", is that this dude? He was the best! I was looking for "don't get brazen with me" on a hoodie but couldn't find it
I say GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY 100 %
my house was broken into and no one saw nothing while they took tv computers and other stuff so you take body out no one was it
Also, this judge needs to retire. Oh my God. This was painful.
can someone please update, was watching the teen in FL who stabbed his class mate 114x
Closing by both parties done. Deliberation since 13h 08. In my opinion, the closing of the Prosecution offered a more coherent narrative. I say guilty on count 2, 3 & 4. Will see.
@@ryanlipple6854 well very articulate argument. I like it.
@@ryanlipple6854 geez. Just watch the whole 15 days.
@@ryanlipple6854 so this is called the argument of the lesser party.
Really can’t understand why people ask others to catch them up because they are behind. We don’t care!
Blood in the van of the defendant belongs to the victim he’s guilty oh and it’s blood
💯💯💯
Right! Why would his blood be in vehicle? Why burn things he wore? In middle of rain storm? GUILTY‼️
That guy makes me think of Gollum from The Lord of the Rings...
Why does the blond defense attorney keep looking at the male Prosecuter's behind?
I mean just look at her LMAO. gross
For people spektical of the blood stain found in the back of Zach’s van, check March 3 & March 17. Two DNA experts make very clear the van had Rosalio’s blood. Look for the picture March 17
Agreed, it had DNA of RG.
Omg! The lady next to the defendant’s father keeps yawning.
OH MY GOD
I'm wondering where Anderson's mother and I think sister is.. They were sitting behind him at the beginning of the trial
His whole family, mom dad, siblings and even siblings spouses I think have been there off and on throughout the trial. I was also wondering where everyone is today. Many showed up for junior. Says a lot in my opinion!
Rosolios blood in defendants van- all I need to know. GUILTY.
Olivia could've cleaned up his tissue from a bloody nose. Did the lab confirm it was blood?
Camera guys gone to sleep and the audios all out of whack! I thought L&C were professional 🤦♀️🙄🙄
Not at all important, but it's been bugging me the whole trial. The pillars on the wall behind Zach, there is a painting error. The one further back, the brown paint goes up higher than the one right behind him, infact higher than all the rest in the courtroom. How is it no one has fixed that?
And someone should pitch out the painting. Not good.
It guys my OCD too
what activity did he record when he visited her house at night with his daughter and they looked through the window?
The couple on the couch listening to music and then going to bed
Did anderson take the stand? I missed a few days
No.
ANYONE- Is that judge the "DON'T get brazen with me!!" judge from the Kyle Rittenhouse case?!?
Yes!
I’m so confused….I thought this had to be edited and put back up bc of him saying the jurors name? This version still has her name as well.
time stamp?
Daughters name you mean? Yeah they said it multiple times. It was also said one other day, I forget. It’s a shame, she’s a minor and should be protected properly.
The daughters name has been said plenty. That’s a whole other issue. But tons of people were claiming today that the reason the video had to be taken down, edited and reposted was bc he said the alternate jurors name. However it’s still in the video. I don’t have the time stamp but it’s right after closings are finished when he releases her.
@@kristimilazzo4094 What made you think they had to edit it to take out her name?
I don't think there is enough evidence and the defense had a good point. If you have enough evidence, why do you need testimony from a scumbag prison snitch? This guy is definitely a jerk and a stalker, but I still don't see how there could be absolutely no DNA of his in the crime scene.
It's Rosolio's DNA!!!!
@2:09:00 I am guessing that lawyers like him is the reason people hate lawyers :)
Go up and get what?
There daughter's bad influence seems to me to have been her Father in my opinion and Sadie was terrified plus it is a machismo reaction to fear is to say you're going to "do something about it!" But he didn't and Zachariah did torture them both!!!
Nope. Sadie, too. That snotty child came from both.
I agree. With him going in their house in the middle of the night and waking the children up, or literally teaching her how to peep in the windows, and to track her own mother. It’s just crazy… and I agree about the machismo comment. It’s perfectly natural of him to be talking that way when you’re feeling like there’s a threat. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t actually concerned, everything progressed so quickly he may not have realized the extent Anderson was willing to go to.
Hmm, Sadie didn't seem terrified at all imo
@@sandra_44 two years from it and after being interviewed by a lot of detectives and attorneys, which makes it much easier to speak about. You can’t really speak her her emotions at the time of this all happening.
Einstein there’s no rear windows in that vehicle
Wow! No verdict! You just never know what a jury is going to do! I say he is guilty! All evidence points to him!
Thing is, I worry that the longer they take indicates there is a lot of doubt about his innocence. Hopefully, they are just being thorough. I think guilty.
@SComment Yea, I hope you are right! I'm just trying to think where the doubt is that he should walk?
The lady Da is a star. And the state is lucky to have her.
Apologies to Solomon, but during their testimonies both Olivia and Sophia came off as deft prevaricators. Being petulant and Ill-mannered, along with contradicting themselves, made them both incredible.
Did they look in Zach’s shed I think that was missed on their investigation. Yes or No?
They searched EVERYWHERE and found nothing except one tiny speck that was so small they could not perform both a blood test and a DNA test.
@@LouHillierPsych they had to choose between a blood test OR a DNA test, they chose DNA and it matched the victims familial DNA. Case closed. He cut out the carpet in his van. He burned bleach bottles and clothing in the rain. He had photos of the victims family and had a file of his information on his computer. He was stalking and watching through the window. My god you’re blind
Who’s the Macias person? Why was she at the wrong building or was that a coverup? Odd
Ugh defense is irritating to listen to
What's w the clevage?
How many Males on the Jury? 🤷🏼♀️🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s so gross
Awfully short time frame for him to kill him & dispose of body. No direct evidence except for how you interpret the spot in the van. As a juror I would have hard time convicting this guy. Was he a butthole & harassing & stalker yes. I would never believe a jailhouse snitch
@@InLieuTube They could not verify it was RG"s blood. They could not rule out that it was his blood.
@@Why0825 I missed the DNA match from the van spot only being through genealogy? Who testified to that?
@@Why0825 it was his dna, they just didn’t have enough to state what type of dna, but it’s common sense it’s blood…a lot more reasonable than phlegm 🤦♀️
Short time span? 5/17 to 5/18- crime scene discovered 5/19… Like Zach said- back in 2020 he was fit and high adrenaline! Look at the photo he took of himself.
Don’t forget the body size of carpet cut out of the van. The boots, jeans and clothes, bleach bottle being burned during rain… the photos of the family of the victim. The blood matching DNA of family members of the victim in HIS CAR. Don’t forget him on camera buying more cleaning supplies, trash bags etc
If the defendant had such a planned attack as the DA says, why would he leave a file on his computer?
He wasnt expecting anyone to think it was him I'd say
Killers always make mistakes
He was too busy getting rid of the body and clothes…but I personally think he wanted to keep that info he gathered…kinda like a trophy
Because he’s not as smart as he thinks he is.
Arrogance
What a strange couple she had a girlfriend promise to take care of her problem and then he is told he killed a guy she was seeing. Oh the guy with many girlfriends that owed money to many guys. He could have got rid of the clothes with the body never found
Wow… forgot about the victim’s kids as well, Zack destroyed a lotta lives
I believe he’s guilty but this DA is a hot mess. The assistant DA was great tho, IMO. Hoping Rosalio and his family get the justice they deserve ⚖️🕊
Honestly defense… your closing is a yawn factor
I really like this ada. Just for his sake I hope they find him guilty. He put a lot of work into this. The longer they take the more I think they won’t. Hope they’re being thorough. We will see
Not guilty
God. Try not to be so willfully ignorant and willing to let a murderer walk
Is this correct... Sadie went on a vakay with Romeo, leaving her friend to care for the children, but failed to inform Zack that she'd be out of the country?
I can’t believe the DA got away with saying that they had found the body, when no evidence was shown!
I’m on the fence on this one but leaning to a NG due to reasonable doubt.
I listened to the full closing argument. Please tell me the time that you heard this.
@@mea1831 I actually watch this earlier when it was streaming live, but decided to rewatch I noticed people were saying he said the same thing in the live chat. I must keep missing it. period.
I heard him say the body was found at 1:17:30
He absolutely said it. “Murdered on the 17th and body found on the 19th” were his words
What difference does it make? As far as reasonable doubt, there's no reasonable explanation for Anderson's behavior if he was actually innocent
The female prosecutor has potentials. All she needs is to get polished down the road.
Exactly my thoughts.
Her name is Jessica Krejcarek
Polished and told to wear appropriate clothing to court
Great closing argument from the DA, from the defence blah blah blah. Why did miss lady defence not speak, would have been better in my opinion. But oh well, let’s see what comes out of this very weird trial. Fun, with the greatest judge, but weird nonetheless.
Prosecution give it up. Find the real killer.
They did 😂
You’re so willfully ignorant it’s actually gross
What points give you reasonable doubt? I have my own