@@Mr_Respect. Spoken like someone who doesn't know what stealth is or how it works. There isn't one "Universal Stealth", it's not like binary code where there is either stealth or there isn't. Stealth is a scale which can be measured in what is called RCS (Radar Cross Section), essentially the lower the number, the harder it is to detect. The reason I call the Su 57 a 4.5th gen fighter is because its stealth capability is around that of an upgraded F-18(E Super hornet), which means its stealthier then 4th gen fighters but its not stealthy enough to be considered 5th gen. In case you're wondering, an Su-57 has an RCS of 0.1m² (in its absolute best case scenario) and that source is from Sukhoi itself. The F-22 has a RCS of 0.0001m² with some sources saying 0.0002m². That means the F-22 is only 1000x times more stealthy (actual factual statement LMAO)
@@КонстантинРокоссовский-б2д 1) a photo of bolts being screwed the way it is not acceptable on stealth airctaft. 2) bulge before the canopy 3) Air intakes and compresor that sticks out 4) Engine nozzeles that are not stealth in any of the way 5) Aircraft just being fucking huge
It's highly unlikely that the SU-57 would be detectable by a World War II-era radar. The technological advancements in radar systems since World War II have been significant. World War II-era radars typically operated at much lower frequencies and had limited range and resolution compared to modern radar systems. The SU-57, being a fifth-generation stealth fighter, is designed to have a reduced radar cross-section and employ various stealth technologies to minimize its detectability by contemporary radar systems. These stealth features would likely make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for a World War II-era radar to detect the SU-57.
LMAO the cope is real, it isn't even a 5th gen fighter and the source is Sukhoi itself. The Su-57 has a RCS (Radar cross section, aka the way you measure stealth. The lower the better.) of 0.1m², and that is in its absolute best scenario, said by Sukhoi itself btw, oh and the F-18E Superhornet has the same RCS, With the F-22 having an RCS of 0.0001m² so cope all you want.
While it looks cool it seems horribly made. From the pictures I have seen of it landed it had nothing preventing radar from bouncing off the intake of air. And also other issues like exposed screws. There is also the fact that I have not heard of any being fielded.
The Su-57 is the most beautiful 4.5th Gen Fighter.
5th
@@ВадимСавенков-з2ю 4.5th* a 5th gen fighter is a stealth fighter
@@Pioneer_DEthen by Ur definition 4.5 doesn't exist
It's Stealth or not there's no between that
@@Pioneer_DE точно, забыл, Су-57 это же тот кусок российского говна который сделал из хрен пойми чего. Тогда действительно 4.5
@@Mr_Respect. Spoken like someone who doesn't know what stealth is or how it works. There isn't one "Universal Stealth", it's not like binary code where there is either stealth or there isn't. Stealth is a scale which can be measured in what is called RCS (Radar Cross Section), essentially the lower the number, the harder it is to detect. The reason I call the Su 57 a 4.5th gen fighter is because its stealth capability is around that of an upgraded F-18(E Super hornet), which means its stealthier then 4th gen fighters but its not stealthy enough to be considered 5th gen. In case you're wondering, an Su-57 has an RCS of 0.1m² (in its absolute best case scenario) and that source is from Sukhoi itself. The F-22 has a RCS of 0.0001m² with some sources saying 0.0002m². That means the F-22 is only 1000x times more stealthy (actual factual statement LMAO)
"speed is life" shows russian jets going slow.
Atleast they go slow so they dont have to pay the physics taxes
@@AngryMunci-vg8yj they don't
@@AngryMunci-vg8yjthey dont even know what physics are. In a two circle dogfight the felon just pulls a backflip and is behind its enemy again
just for the song bro
Nice edit!
💌
the SU-57 is so stealth it has not been seen in combat before
this had me laugh out loud 😂
Скажи это украинцам, по которым нередко проводятся удары с су 57
@@ЧертизподвалаA-G but not A-A
this edit was fire to watch from a radar
💀
Some are easily impressed.
Better than the F-15 edit
Awesome edit mate
F 22 🤧😜
Su-57 is so beeg it can be detected by radar from ww2
Do you have any proof?
@@КонстантинРокоссовский-б2д 1) a photo of bolts being screwed the way it is not acceptable on stealth airctaft.
2) bulge before the canopy
3) Air intakes and compresor that sticks out
4) Engine nozzeles that are not stealth in any of the way
5) Aircraft just being fucking huge
@@strikingeagle9855 The radar in ww2 are not capable of detecting the su-57 due to its altitude and speed .
@@Aspect.32 due to same logic modern military radar won't detect meteor coming into our atmosphere
It's highly unlikely that the SU-57 would be detectable by a World War II-era radar. The technological advancements in radar systems since World War II have been significant. World War II-era radars typically operated at much lower frequencies and had limited range and resolution compared to modern radar systems.
The SU-57, being a fifth-generation stealth fighter, is designed to have a reduced radar cross-section and employ various stealth technologies to minimize its detectability by contemporary radar systems. These stealth features would likely make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for a World War II-era radar to detect the SU-57.
Hey Aspect, delete all comments from american propagandists now 💥
Su-57 is the best 5th Gen Fighter in the world
LMAO the cope is real, it isn't even a 5th gen fighter and the source is Sukhoi itself. The Su-57 has a RCS (Radar cross section, aka the way you measure stealth. The lower the better.) of 0.1m², and that is in its absolute best scenario, said by Sukhoi itself btw, oh and the F-18E Superhornet has the same RCS, With the F-22 having an RCS of 0.0001m² so cope all you want.
@@Pioneer_DE This is all american propaganda, comrade
@@mrfire735_1 The source is literally Sukhoi itself... Sukhoi... as in the Russian company that made the Su 57...
@@Pioneer_DE Nah comrade, you are lying. I looked at the source and it says RCS = 0.00001m².
@@mrfire735_1 it does not, anyhow if you don't have anything meaningful to say then seize your annoyance.
Not even the motto of the SU-57
While it looks cool it seems horribly made. From the pictures I have seen of it landed it had nothing preventing radar from bouncing off the intake of air. And also other issues like exposed screws. There is also the fact that I have not heard of any being fielded.
still the worst jet to be made in human history 💀💀💀