Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Damage to Karen Read's Tail Light Isn’t Consistent With Hitting John O'Keefe: Accident Expert
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
- David Wolfe, an accident reconstruction expert, took the stand Monday morning in the boyfriend cop murder trial. He revealed that he believes the damage to Karen Read’s car does not match the damage it would have sustained if it had hit a human body. Wolfe testified that, from a damage standpoint, the damage to the tail light was inconsistent with the car allegedly striking John O’Keefe’s head.
Subscribe to Law&Crime Trials for More Courtroom Coverage: bit.ly/LawAndC...
Watch More Karen Read Trial Clips: bit.ly/KarenRe...
Karen Read faces several charges including second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. She was arrested in February of 2022, a few days after John O’Keefe died. If convicted, Read faces life in prison.
#KarenRead #MurderTrial #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
Watch More Karen Read Trial Clips: bit.ly/KarenReadTrial
This judge needs to be investigated
Clear, articulate, doesn’t falter or pause searching for words, this guy is incredibly credible.
Eye contact is constant even when taking a drink, not one ummmm or ahhhhh he is epic!!!
More importantly his testimony is based on science!!!
@@doragreen3887facts my friend
And the other people’s science isn’t science?
@@LisaBush-qb2ic credibility is important factor. This guy has Phd, the withness for the CW has and associates degree in some disciplin, which wasn't in accident reconstruction. CW guy did no forensic testing, at least he didn't enumuerate any.
The fact that NO COP on scene knocked on the Albert's house is mind boggling...And quite frankly a dereliction of their duty...SHAME ON PROCTOR and any other officer involved in this case...Had this case been objectively investigated this woman would not be on trial
Oh, but cops protect one another. I was married to one....once. It was disgusting what I witnessed. They would beat up suspects and then lie about it. L.A. Sheriff's Dept.
Excellent point!
@@marygoff3332which is confusing because they certainly didn’t protect one of their own police officers: JO. And did I hear that not one of those people even went to JO’s funeral?!? Shameful.
@@kelli2833were they wanted at the funeral?
Lol!! They want Karen to be accountable for JO’s death, why would they’ll be honest in the investigation and collection of evidence? Then it will point back to the real killers which are the Alberts and Higgins.
This expert is very knowledgeable, credible, and just overall a smart scientist. The commonwealth's "expert" was a freakin joke. He was a kid that took a few hours of simple physics and math and he was certified as an expert,which is pathetic
Kid? Nah, that trooper from the commonwealth graduated from university in 2003. This witness is probably 10-years younger 😅
@@D-Z321 true 👍
@@D-Z321well based on what we have witnessed from the “experts” from the commonwealth only have to have an associate degree and doesn’t have to know basic physics and math questions. Not the brightest in that town.
This Man's parents should be PROUD. He literally looks and acts like Superman! Class Act ❤
So classy, confident, intelligent, strong and honest!
Intelligent? Just because he built a cannon from scratch simply to test a theory? You ladies get impressed with the silliest things these days..
🙋 Yes!. Everything about his testimony is fire.. Apparently it's not just "us ladies" It's the F.B.I. Seriously?? 😊
AMAZING!!
Totally
It is simply astonishing that this was allowed to go to trial.
Why she is guilty of murder? Nobody else wanted him dead more that she did.
@@fglocal5250 what's your iq?
the albert crime family needed a patsy, karen read filled the bill. the real question is who has the power to control the canton police, the state police and the norfolk county district attorney's office. that is the person or persons the fbi are investigating.
@@fglocal5250 they haven’t even proven murder… it was ruled undetermined and experts today said he could have simply fallen
@@fglocal5250and you know that how? Because in the moment she was annoyed with him?
Judge doing her best to prevent the truth from being heard
Exactly my opinion.
Yep , bev is despicable! And shouldn't be allowed on bench.🤬
😂your ridiculous. She has been steady with both attorneys..watch the court lives
She really is. It's scary.
Auntie Bev-erage probably warned them all that the order to retain their phone data was coming because they all destroyed their phones the day before they received the order.
This expert is very credible and professional.
How could the jury struggle with a not guilty verdict in this case ?
The foreperson that the corrupt judge selected is a former police officer (who NEVER should have been on the jury)
Allegedly the jury was rigged.
The state & demeanor of this "judge" is staggering...truly staggering...
It’s laughable that Lally is grilling a scientific expert on accuracy.. when Lally put Trooper Paul on the stand…
Lally should be embarrassed. He's absolutely terrible lawyer.
@@mishkrager I feel like he’s not the worse attorney but was just given the worst case in recent history by the DA to try and defend!
@@mishkrager but should also be a embarrassed by the witnesses he put on the stand
Lally is trying to sound like he knows more that these expects he is just laughable he goes down in history as the male MARCIA CLARK! 😂😂
@@sueper28 Don’t make excuses for him. He is a human being capable of free will. A fundamentally moral person would have refused to try this case.
If she hit him with her car to cause the amount of damage to his that has been reported, why have they not mentioned that any amount of blood, tissue, etc was found on her car? Also he had an injury to the back of his head, if she left him to die in the snow, why aren't they saying blood was found where his body was found? If he died where she left him, where is the blood?
It happened in the basement of the Albert’s household. Specifically in the weight room…
There was over 3Q of blood unaccounted for when autopsy was performed, that could not have possibly been collected in the *”red solo cups.”* the volume collected wasn’t even comparable… what they gathered was equatable to a nose bleed…
Head trauma bleeds a lot.
Somehow, miraculously, the blood went away with the concrete in Albert's basement floor. It was like an angel of death moved the blood. Truly a phenomena
Wolfe and Rentshel and the phone guy. Make that whole circle of friends and police look incredibly evil and guilty of misconduct and conspiracy. Also the prosecutor looks morally and professionally awful that he is even trying this case. Especially when trooper Paul is your *expert* your relying on who is atrociously incompetent and corrupt.
Moral and professional don’t belong in the same sentence as Lally. He is 100% unethical and he doesn’t even care.
This type of behavior from the prosecution is why lally's boss, the District Attorney, michael morrissey is the subject of the federal grand jury criminal investigation being conducted by the Justice Department and the FBI.
@@coryhernandez508 THE JURY DIDN'T BELIEVE IN THE THIRD PARTY CULPRIT
Dr. Wolfe was an excellent witness. Wow!
That judge is dreadful! Not allowing an expert opionion on cause? Re trial on judge alone!
become a judge then and do better
Totally agree....she.needs investigating after this is all over!
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b unfairness is seen and felt even as child. It's the justice system that needs to better!
@@donna626 she is guilty though
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b I don't think so.
This guy without a doubt was the defenses strongest witness.
I feel like Brian Higgins, Brian Albert, McCabe and Proctor were the defenses strongest witness, even though they weren't the defenses witness.
they were paid
@@mrsalilg agreed
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b See the testimony, he was not paid.
@@user-ii2uh1xq7bthey weren’t paid or met with defense prior to trial ! Very credible testimony
Wouldn't there have been severe bruises from a vehicle hit?
Yes. The doctor who just testified speaks about this
and from a violent fight? I mean John was no small guy carrying out and throwing him on the asphalt no bruising?
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b most of the injuries were all confined to head/ face area like in a fist fight.
@@annesmith1223 fist fights dont cause any other injuries? what about when they picked up his nobody and dumped it in the yard?
@@annesmith1223yes and not one bruise other than his arm . Deff doesn’t sound like no automobile accident. How would head get hit only. Plus this guy said there was a dent also on her car. Video showed at her home she may have hit that Parker car backing out his driveway.
More exculpatory than “damage isn’t consistent” is the fact that that the tail light wasn’t shattered until after John was found dead. It was still only cracked but not destroyed as of Jan 29 afternoon per Dighton Police Sergeant Barros. It was shattered after the Lexus was towed back to Canton from Dighton.
@@patrickdaly836 LAST PRETRIAL HEARING JACKSON TALKS ABOUT KAREN READ S ADMISSION OF GUILT
This dude is very articulate
AND a babe … 😊
@lincolnhtschick I read that as attractive, lol!
@@lincolnhtschick keep that ro your self please
@@lincolnhtschick Like a movie star. Heavens! (The heat wave is suddenly inside, too).
@@AnnaChristie-vp4ipI wish I could!!!!!
Karen was the only person related to this situation that was not a cop, cop wife, cop kid or kid friend. Therefore get your story straight and frame the outsider!
oh please
Thank You Sir for your Integrity ✨
please he was paid
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b shows what you know. The FBI hired him.
@@user-ii2uh1xq7bAre you deaf? They are hired aka paid by the FBI. Not the prosecution and not the defense. They were completely INDEPENDENT and have no skin in the game.
The science and the math in fact prove KR did not kill John O’Keefe. Meaning the beating and dog attack he suffered were not caused by her bumper and tail light! It’s not a complicated issue.
We need to turn our attention to actual getting justice for officer O and his family
Yes you are correct about that except for there is no justice with Proctor as the lead investigator. He is one Shady character. I feel sorry for anybody that has a case that guy is investigating.
Agreed although not possible at this point sadly. They completely mishandled the investigation.
Apparently that is not what this case is about!
I look forward to seeing what the feds investigation turns up!
@BH-1964 Exactly!
A truly refined, articulate and credible expert witness. Very impressive expert and masterful strategy for the defense to end testimony with him.
After observering Karen's CAR, I felt she was innocent. If she hit John and shattered her tail light that supposed to have caused his death, how would her tail light be intact when she was driving away from John's home .
Exactly. This should never have gone to trial. Waste money. XO
Exactly, plus there would be tissue, hair and DNA evidence on the tail light! There is SO much reasonable doubt in this case I'm amazed that it made it to Court, I'm sure that if John O'Keefe was not a LEO found dead in another LEO's front garden this would have never made it to court! This trial stinks to high heaven!
You can't argue with physics!😂
Dr. Wolfe is fine as wine!!! And intelligent whew somebody cool me down 😂
Karen Reed has great group of Lawyers I’m glad you have them not guilty
I am a big supporter of the blue, but in this case they screwed up and Karen Read is innocent. I hope they investigate these police officers and get to the bottom of what really happened.
I highly doubt that’ll happen. Whether Karen is found guilty or acquitted, I’d expect cops in that area to remain certain that “Karen backed over John O’Keefe with her Lexus and left him there to die in the cold because she’s a whack job”…it’s unfortunate, the way they seem to be in this case.
I would say the state has failed to prove guilt.
Compared to the testimonies from the alcoholic and semi literate gang of the Albert family and friends, this was an excellent example of honesty and professional integrity. It’s a breath of fresh air to have someone not obfuscate and lie. And btw, that judge needs to be investigated. Cheers from Canada 🇨🇦👍
Yes she does. No integrity whatsoever
I think he most impressed by his self for inventing his cannon… which the defense attorney was also impressed by and used it to stroke this guy’s ego… defense attorney is a spider… and he is spinning a web of deception…😮
Canadians don’t have any idea of what it is like to be an American citizen…. You only wish…
You don't need an expert to see all the inconsistencies and psychical impossibilities in this case, the prosecutor and judge are highly questionable for bringing this case to trial.
A Judge does NOT bring a case to tail. A DA decides that.
@@Jane-kp3xryeah that’s why the comment above also mentions the prosecutor.
Also…
The judge co-signs the questionable decisions of the ADA in this case by not holding both parties to the same exact standards.
@logicandreason8090 In addition this judge has had several opportunities to dismiss this case, for very valid and justifiable reasons, and she refused to each and every time. She’s just as much of a Corrupt POS as Proctor, Lally, & Morrissey are!
Not guilty... Arrest the McAlberts.
Sounds like a bunch of inebriated dudes that lost track of their friend.
Whats the point if the judge doesnt let Jackson ask the necessary questions? This is why the witness showed uo to say if she hit him or not. Its immpossible to defend Karen with those sustained objections. This is why the witness was invited....to testify if John was striked by Karen SUV. After all this will finish Jackson should file complain against the judge and prosecutor in the Bar association.
cry me a river she is going by the law there are certain questions you cant ask because they leading action jackson seems to do that a lot
@@user-ii2uh1xq7boh yeah coz since the cw has been asking questions that leads to nowhere, presented witnesses that has conflicting stories and law enforcement that botched the investigation from the get go. But yes, let's criticize the defense's way of questioning because it's soooooo bad. 😂
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b Sure, Jen.
😂😂😂😂@@goodcompany6494
I can’t believe lollipop tried to cross these geniuses! He looked and sounded like a fool
I have only been able to watch here and there, but caught that Dr.'s testimony today. WOW! Based on what I heard from him, NOT GUILTY!!! He was an awesome witness for the Defense. Game over!
This witness (doctor) for the defense is great. Hard as the prosecution tries, they can't trip him up. Very obvious he's leagues above the prosecutor in intelligence.
Even the judge was crushing on him 😂
this judge says, SUSTAINED! in her sleep
Oh but only for the defence! 😮
Yeah but she struggles with the word "overruled".
I'll allow that.
@@colemacedo-phillips5768 really?
😂💯
" I'll allow it " is a favorite of hers too
Police probably knocked her tail light out. When they took her vehicle into the police station .
The judge should be removed just for allowing this case to go forward, she can't be trusted.
The DA decides if a Trail goes forward or not. NOT the Judge.
@@Jane-kp3xrNot true. There were several motions submitted to dismiss this case prior to trial and also during trial and the Judge refused to dismiss it. She’s just as bad and the DA, ADA, and, the MSP!
@@2882Lindsey It actually is the D.A's choice to take the case to trial. But the defense is always allowed to submit motions to dismiss the charges. These defense attorneys also submitted motions to have the judge recuse herself from judging this trial because of her numerous conflicts' of interest. She refused to allow another judge try the case. The District Attorney is the one who is the subject of a federal criminal grand jury investigation being conducted by the Justice Department and the FBI.This is not the 1st time he's knowingly prosecuted an innocent person. This is the 1st crime or the even the 1st murder he's covered up.D.A michael morrissey is without a doubt, filthy dirty, corrupt. He's absolutely morally bankrupt. His entire office is too
@@kchunter7389 I am well aware that it’s the DA with the ultimate decision to bring a case to trial. And although they are supposed to adhere to strict ethical guidelines and are supposed to seek justice within the law(Not just seek a conviction). This DA’s office follows its own set of “guidelines”. Should Morrissey or his office have taken this to trial? No absolutely not. But my point was or is… Once the Norfolk County DA decided to throw ethics out the window and proceed with a malicious prosecution… It then becomes the job of the judge to make sure our system of justice is working as it was intended to. Bev had ample opportunities to dismiss this case prior to it going to trial and also during the trial. There were several valid motions to dismiss put in front of her that she chose to ignore. And you’re right she also had the opportunity to recuse herself, and she refused to. TBH she actually wasn’t even originally assigned to this case. But because she is the “Senior” judge at that court house she rearranged schedules and specifically assigned this case to her docket(which is completely sus in and of itself). Many people including myself believe this is the reason KR’s charges were upgraded to 2nd degree murder. Because the DA’s office knew it would then be pushed up to Superior Court. They knew they had Auntie Bev in their back pockets, and knew she would be able to assign this case to herself. Don’t think for one second that Bev being the judge for this, wasn’t by design. With that being said, I’m sticking to my prior opinion… Beverly Canone is as crooked and corrupt as the NCDA, the ADA, and the MSP!. 🤷🏼♀️
I hope trooper paul is taking notes this is how you break it down
🤭
I saw photos of the vehicle and the only damage seemed to be the tail light. One would think that hitting a full grown man would put a dent into the body.
This guy can’t be an expert like blooper Paul because “it just did… and stuff” was never uttered
he was prepped better
He didn't get hit by a car.
Then why was there particals...found on his shirt??????????
@@colettejaques2559 Procter put them there duh
@@colettejaques2559are you serious?
We ALL KNEW FROM THE START!!!!!!COVER UP!!!!FKR JUSTICE FOR OFFICER JO!!!!!
You knew before you heard the evidence? That's weird.
@@smacdonald5142 It's not, everyone claimed there was this "mountain of evidence" despite the FBI running a parallel investigation on prosecution witnesses, then offered up two of their own highly respected/educated forensics experts for free to the defense, why would they do that if this was some "conspiracy"?? Why would the FBI ruin their reputation by interfering in a small town murder case, state the defense didn't ask them to and then turn around and refute the two biggest pieces of evidence in this case: the "hos long to die" search, and the claim she hit him with her SUV? They have no skin in this case, why do that?!
@@smacdonald5142the evidence was out there before the start of the trial as a matter of public record.
Where was the blood and skin from scratches on JO's arm? Winter and no coat/jacket? Must have put jacket on after severe head wound????!!!!!
Free Karen Read!!
The science tells you everything!
Not guilty. Cover up.
guilty
It's laughable the state theory of arm or head getting hit by single half broken tail light @ 24mph spun OJO around and he went flying through the air and landed in his resting place on lawn.
If this guy and the doctor are right, then that means Proctor planted the glass on John's shirt!
That’s one of the only sticking points; and Karen Read telling JOK’s sister that they would likely never speak again.
Remember that Proctor collected his clothes and didn't sign it in as evidence and completely miss handled it. Pretty obvious he did it to tamper with it. Same with the tail light.
@@quicklykay Yeah cos murderers always tell the victim's family that they are the most likely suspect. What are you people on? You are a bit quiet about all the butt-dialing and the destruction of phones though, aren't you? Cops discover a body then destroy their phones? Yeah, right; makes perfect sense.
Karen's biggest problem will be the fact that the jury is made up of Americans who like you are impervious to logic and reason.
Particles on clothes, yet no blood on any lights on lawn, no blood on tail light casing, no fragments of light embedded in arm and no blood on shirt. They didn’t think this through well. Makes no sense except planted.
I hope the FBI brings charges in federal court!
It’s virtually milliseconds after he says objection she says sustained,like she’s not even thought about it. She’s already decided what she’s going to do.
She partied with the Alberts; they have video of her, allegedly.
@@undercoveragent9889 when it’s over, they going to auntie Bev’s holiday home. Even if karen is found guilty, the prosecution could say well we still think she is the prime suspect so we’re not going to investigate any further so all those lot and get off with it.
@@arzemagic I believe they are going to find out the feds are not anything like them... I look for the truth to eventually be told.
The Albert's got rid of the dog oh rehomed her (according to an Albert not the same as gotten rid of) they moved from this home that they raised their children in! (I find this odd) almost as if they couldn't live there any longer knowing that a man was attacked by their dog and murdered within the walls of that family home.
Totally agree....worst and most conflicted Judge I ever saw! I hope this is looked into after the trial!
i noticed that too
Beverly Cannone should be recused from this case, disbarred and investigated.
You're ridiculous!!!
Lol, Lally is fumbling in the cross examination... As a witness, David Wolfe puts the prosecution's previous "expert" to shame. The state's expert (Trooper Joe Paul) couldn't explain anything, and Lally thinks he's going to stump the defense expert, simply by using fancy terminology, like "conspicuity!"
Lol
The fact that the prosecution could have called these experts just makes this trial even more embarrassing. What a waste of nine weeks. Not guilty.
I think that that the state, Lally, didn’t call this man or anyone from the Feds because he thought that the Feds should not have been involved in this case in the first place. I believe that the Feds were called to investigate this case by the defense, and the defense counsel prior to this trial starting.
By the way… she is indeed guilty of hurting Officer O’Keefe with her own words….
Honestly I don’t think the judge knows WHY she sustains the Questions regarding the Defendant .
It is called 'being a judge' and that you don't understand suggests you are not. This is EXACTLY why contempt of court is a crime but contempt of police is not. Judges effectively ARE the court, they uphold the laws and make sure procedures are followed. If you haven't passed the bar and spent at least a decade practicing law in court, there is no more reason you should understand what the rules are than you should understand a nuclear power reactor without being a physicist.
@@saltriverpirate3172 You forgot to mention that the Judge is in bed with the Alberts, quisling.
Aunt Bev is related to the prosecution.
Ridiculous statement.
It's impossible to know why... he doesn't even have to give a reason? Perplexing. Judge looks ridiculous that look on her face while she rocks in her chair
Will they seek the real killer once Karen Read is acquitted?
Unfortunately, probably not.
This young man’s testament was unbelievably professional in my opinion. The specific testing, bio-chemical testing and engineering testing was above all impressive. It was exceptionally frustrating that this judge continued to side with the prosecution. Bev is clearly biased!
The most credible and convincing testimony of the entire trial. He's great!
You are easily impressed.
It never even occurred to me that he could have thrown the glass at the taillight….,makes a lot of sense!
Wouldn’t it be a natural reflex to take those precious few moments to jump out of the way of a vehicle about to hit you vs. take the time to throw the glass in your hand at the tail light of the vehicle?
Did it occur to you that a hair of John wouldn’t have made it 60 miles in a blizzard to be pulled off easily with a set of tweezers when they inspected the vehicle? And the only possible explanation for that to happen is that it was planted? I’m really not sure how anyone in their right mind could conclude he was hit by a vehicle after seeing the evidence
@@JosephBroughtonsounds to me like they were arguing when she dropped him off. He very well could have chucked the glass at the back of her car and then went inside. Common Sense 101
Yeah and she forgot to mention that...Think she would notice if a glass was thrown at her vehicle... I actually do agree it is possibility and that it angered her more, thus backing up on him.. Why not say that from get go if she really innocent..
@@user-jx1fg8kq2bmaybe that’s the reason she said; did i hit him? It was the glas that he threw at her when she drove off and did not pay more attention to the sound she heard? And he then went inside?
Are you listening trooper Paul? 👀 take notes please 😂 trooper Paul: “it just does”
This expert: spitting straight facts
By far strongest non-biased testimony in this whole trial for defense. Does prosecution not understand that FBI hired and provided these two experts over for both sides for a reason? If prosecution read their reports and still continued this trial like this than something way bigger is going on. They all can’t be this dense, or are they?
I can’t believe the way lollies question this expert. He should’ve questioned his own expert like this.
At last.Qualified professional analysis based on scientific research. Not sloppy unqualified trouper testimony.
it might be sloppy but its real, these two are paid to talk about scientific data which noone understands.
@@user-ii2uh1xq7bspeak for yourself if you don’t understand it.
Many of us do understand it.
And they were paid, sure.
But not by either party in this case.
You’re only allowed to ask questions like… would you say the only possible explanation is that miss read is hundred percent guilty.
I wonder if when Karen is found not guilty, will the Feds go after the Alberts
no
@@karenrossi9132 they should
She will be found guilty
@@colettejaques2559what was that???
"yeah, it was pretty awesome"
Lally trying to prove he is smarter than a highly educated witness and failing miserably.
He's amazing. Well educated, articulate, the perfect
Expert witness.
I would pay to see a live stream of these brilliant experts watching Trooper Paul’s testimony. These guys are heroes.
Extremely smart .. and nice eye candy 😍
Commonsense 🏆
My wise old boss used to say ‘common sense isn't too common’. That certainly applies here!
So how did her tail light break and pieces end up by him and on him? The cops busted it and staged it?
are you for real?
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b just asking. Only catching some highlights. How did they stage it?
I saw a great 3 minute video by a RUclipsr that makes her guilty AF. Then I’m seeing sides of crooked cops. So which is it?
@@dodgecharger5040according to the last two experts (hired by the FBI) not the defense there is no possible way John was hit by a car. The investigation on this case was a joke so unfortunately we will never know what happened but it’s pretty clear Karen didn’t hit him
@@dodgecharger5040 the problem is that I don't know how the pieces got there. The crooked cop (Proctor) had seized the vehicle for 90 minutes before the warrant was in. He had access to the crime scene which wasn't secure. Video from the sallyport was missing so we don't know who came in or out during that time. Proctor had made up his mind as to who committed the crime before he'd even investigated. Then he accepted gifts from the Alberts, who he should have been investigating. An independent cop at the scene said her tail light was cracked but not shattered in the morning before it was seized. He created so much room for doubt with his terrible police work. I think she'll be found not guilty.
Imagine asking an expert that go to the bar to get a glass yet proctor didn’t have anyone go into the house 😂
I love how excited he got about the “cannon” - I definitely trust his expertise over the convoluted and nonsensical story from the far less knowledgeable testimonies of the prosecutions so called experts.
Yes, but didn’t Trooper Paul say the crime scene spoke to him? 😅
no way a drunken woman such as K.R. could back up in a, 'straight' line 60 feet in a snowy blizzard. NO WAY!
well she made it home wasted on vodka so she us super woman.
The only injuries to John not relative to his face, which was from being punched and beat up mind you, was the dog bites on his arm. OK, let’s fantasize and say those are scratches from the accident. Are you going to tell me that the rear tail light broke when it hit that arm? The arm that has no bruises, but just dog bites, I mean scratches? That broke the tail light? Has anyone ever seen a tail light? You would need a hammer to break it.
lets fantasize off the get go and say we know exactly what happened in the first place anyway. 🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂
AND there was NO BLOOD ON ANY OF THE TAILLIGHT PIECES ,NOT QUILTY!!
@@denisephillips1988 he had interval injuries which means hes bleeding inside
Didn't he lose 2L of blood? WHERE?!!!!!!!
Cover up cover up!!!!!! Was beaten by cop with red knuckles !!!!!!! NOT GUILTY
That was the cops nephew. Brother in law’s son.
@@lillypants what was the motive?
@@user-ii2uh1xq7bDoesn't have to be any motive. Just brutish, juvenile behavior that went too far following a night of heavy drinking.
@@annesmith1223 juvenile behavior? to break someones skull isnt juvenile its pure evil what is wrong with you?
@user-ii2uh1xq7b is obviously a family member 😂😂 she’s helping with the cover up behind the scenes.
Judge needs to get another job
The judge is on autopilot to sustain any objection from Lally, she doesn't even contemplate.
Somebody commented she says it in her sleep
NOT QUILTY NOT QUILTY !!! Cops did it cops did it!!
Uhmmm! Do you mean Not GUILTY! Wtf is quilty?
A kind of quilt? Or not quilt like?
😂😂😂😂😂😂
20:00 that woman defense attorney is hyper focused on this witness 😅
It makes me sick that the prosecution is working with the judge together !!
Love it when they have a witness that can't be rattled under cross examination. The procecutor thinks he's the expert but got shut doen.
Energy does not lie!! This smart attractive man just got Justice For John O'Keefe! Free Karen Read!
Dr. Crash Daddy Wolfe
This judge is horrible!
Case closed not guilty
guilty
@@user-ii2uh1xq7b. Get back in your box.. 📦
Justice for John O'Keefe
and his family! 🙏🏼❤️🩹
Yes! He threw the glass. I have thought this for awhile now. I am sure many others of you have, too.
How did the glass get under his body then? Doesn't this support the CW's claim that they fought and she backed into him?
They just proved that he didn’t throw a glass 😬
I don't think they proved that a glass was thrown lol. I think they may have exposed how much more likely it is that the glass was broken sprinkled on the car and the body, and the tail light was smashed with something
I love this guy!!
This never was a homicide trial; It was a popularity contest.......
Another great reel! Thanks Peter
Who said that the damage to the car was done at the thne she dropped it? Why didnt they took pictures of the Lexus before they towed it away?
Bj ch b;l
His shoe came off, therefore he was hit by a vehicle- the fourth law of physics. Endof!
😂lol there are many ways for one's shoe to come off.
Yes, no one could have possibly removed that shoe another way. You should be a detective 😂
His shoe came off so she's guilty!! Give me a break! You aren't embarrassed writing that in a public forum!? Yikes 🙄
Came off schmoff🤔🤔the mcalberts deliberately TOOK shoe off to cover their serial killer plot🤔
John took his shoes off entering Albert's house, the shoe was planted!
Idk this expert, but he makes me proud!! Dang. He blew it away. 😊❤
I like how AJ asked questions and after he was done, the judge ordered a morning break giving time for Lally to get help to come up with questions to try to make the Dr look bad. I feel, if a witness is in the stand then both parties should ask questions before a break or being released
Why dont jackson object? The prosecution objected every other question...why didnt Jacjson objecting?
Because lalley objects because the answers to those questions are damaging to his narrative, and he doesn’t want them answered. Jackson knows no matter what question is asked, or how the expert responds- it’s not going to damage the defenses theory! Most of the time the extra info given by the expert (rather than objecting to it) furthered the amount of reasonable doubt, and just further showed how the commonwealth has no theory backed by physics and facts!!
cause there was nothing to object to, what is yetti doing just getting cozy with karen?
@@user-ii2uh1xq7bhello Colin
Can't wait for when closing arguments happen, I like when closing arguments take place because it sounds so much better when it is puts together & makes more sense of everything, I still think defense is winning, I really don't think Karen at all did this, John's arm definitely looks like a dog attack & his face was beaten up, maybe John didn't go in the house Maybe John was beaten up on the front lawn & the dog attacted John & John passed out in the snow cause he was beaten up so bad & John then frozed to death with having hypothermia & the Alberts & the McCabes knew what had happened & they all tried covering it up. Because they all knew they would all be held accountable & because Trooper Proctor knew the families & Trooper Proctor Hated Karen & Trooper Proctor Tampered with the evidence & made it look like it was Karen that did this. one thing, is, The Judge is very Biased she always sustains everything, she always rushes everything, she always has an attitude, I don't care very much for this Judge.. She should of been removed.. I believe Karen is definitely 100% not guilty & all the ones involved should be charged & if I was Karen after this is over I would file a civil suit & sue them all. & reading some comments people couldn't possibly watched this whole trial, People are just guessing stuff as you hear it. Lol I been watching from the very beginning & John's O'Keefes family testified in the beginning , they think too that this was a cover up. People need to read & understand the whole story before just guessing & assuming & Karen was drunk dialing John but before she knew John was dead if Karen knew John was dead she would not of texted John that many times. With people just assuming without even been following this story & trial, People would just send anyone to prison This is a woman's life on the line I bet though when Karen is found not guilty, Karen doesn't drink anymore & Proctor should of been fired immediately Karen has great lawyers especially Karen's lawyer Jackson from California & I read Karen spent over 10,000 in lawyers fees
Karen Read was observed drinking at lunch time in a North End restaurant with one of her lawyers, so it is a blatant lie to say she quit drinking
Retired FBI agent Jennifer Coffinander personally saw Karen Read drinking at lunchtime with her lawyer at a restaurant in Boston
@bethmccrae2714 ok she's still not guilty evidence shows This has nothing to do with how much they all were drinking that night case shows evidence that has nothing to do with drinking
@@bethmccrae2714 So? Are you the drinking police?
@@bethmccrae2714 So, I’m confused as to the relevance of KR having a drink with lunch?
He's the first witness I've seen who seemed to know what he was talking about and wasn't trying to avoid questions. I wish that the judge and lawyers had let him talk when he wanted to explain things. He creates real doubt about the prosecution's view of the case.
Prosecution's line of questioning feels weird to me. it feels like he is trying to sow reasonable doubt as to what might have happened, rather than trying to show conclusively what did happen. Feels almost like the defense and prosecution have their roles reversed sometimes in this case.
The bias judge rocking back and forth in her chair is distracting. What a job.