Inside The Full Scale Replica of Noah's Ark in Kentucky | dose.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 май 2017
- dose. takes a deep look inside The Ark Encounter,' an exhibit in Northern Kentucky that attracts hundreds of thousands of guests a year.
We went to ask the important question: 'Why?"
Find out more about The Ark Encounter here:
arkencounter.com/ 
Развлечения
Noahs sons and daughters in law had chores of EPIC proportions
It's there to show people that the ark was not just a cute little cartoon ark with animals hanging off the sides like it gets portrayed. It wa huge, more like a huge barge or container ship. Jesus Christ is the ark now, better hop in while there is time. It's beautiful in here.
He is so sarcastic
Do you think so? I don't know he seemed really genuine to me.
Seriously
Guy asks why. I ask why not?
I'm so glad Dose is uploading like Ive been subbed since the Lebron video just in case u guys get big and now since yall are uploading I know y'all will get big
The ark encounter is TOP NOTCH!!!
"Replica" means an exact copy. Therefore this is not a replica.
there is one in the Netherlands--and it floats
Better Question.....WHY NOT??
Even better question, What The Fuck
Because the money could have been spent on better things. This will more likely cause people to eschew the faith, not embrace it.
@@incorrba Better Things such as.....??
@@piijay14 It doesn't matter. Take your pick. Building 75 million ice cream stands would have been better than this.
@@incorrba We gotta enough 'Ice Cream' stands. We don't have enough Faith based Theme Parks!
it took noah 120 years to make it .
I am a missionary in Thailand. There are poor Christians languishing
away in immigration prison in deplorable conditions in third world countries. You could have sprung them from prison. Some are stuck in prison for years, their only crime being that they overstayed their visa. What a collosal waste of the Lord's money. The need for the Gospel in 3rd world countries is desperate. The Labourers are so few here. Church funds should be prioritized for the great commission, and helping the poor.
I'd say it would be worth it if all of the proceeds were going towards mission. Taking millions of dollars and dumping it into missions one time isn't as valuable as creating something that generates exponentially more money and dumps that into missions yearly for the next 50, 100, ???? years
@@bdnelss8442 I doubt there's 50 years left. The harvest is white. The time is now. These projects don't save souls. They need to raise up preachers to go into all the world and preach the gospel
You didn't asked WHY for 'Disneyland...or 'Six Flags...or the Casinos in Vegas. Now somebody builds an Attraction that's 'Biblical' base and all of a sudden you wanna know Why!!
Right, WHY, we know the purpose of the others, bit what the fuck is the point of this Horse shit.
This 🔥
Flying Dog, you are so right!
@@flyingdog1498 Because out the 2billion Theist around the world Im sure some would like to see it! I respect the fact that it doesn't meet your personal taste let those who wanna enjoy do so in peace!
Why does he has to be a jerk about it.... Why go in the first place if you're gonna act like it's a joke to you!!!!
evil
I agree! What a chump( and I hesitated calling him that because I realize that wasn’t a Christian thing to say but I couldn’t help myself!). An actual Bible reading follower of God would have been a much better choice.
Agreed… this guy is a bit of a dick..! I wanted to learn about the ark..
Thank to Noah, we have cruse ships now.
Ship of fools
You did not ask them anything about the Ark in general!! Would love to see that
It's there because it's part of history, why do we have museums throughout the country ??What a stupid question!!!!!!!
This is a myth not history.
No history here, just fantasy.
The Bible is a myth until people meet their maker 😶
To share the gospel!
Promote the BullShit.
@@flyingdog1498 you sir, I will pray for.
@@flyingdog1498 And that's how atheists are! All of them are fools!
"Full scale replica"? If ever put into a big enough body of water, that replica would sink on the spot.
the one built in Netherlands floats
i went in 2019
yesterday
How was it?! This is so interesting I wanna visit
@@maeart628 It is total STUPIDITY.
@@flyingdog1498 Get lost, materialistic dogma kiddo!
Its. Huge🤯
Thenk you for My lord Jesus
Beautiful
I don't recall the Bible talking about the ark having a building build on the backside of it where the exhibits are also located. Funny how they had to do that as there is not enough room to make a proper full sized ark.
This guy is the reason God flooded the planet the first time!
😅😅🤣
And God repopulated the planet through incest with a handful of "chosen" people?
Cool story!
I am surprised your god didn't strike him down as he entered. Sarcasm added.
Lol! There were no dinosaurs on the ark.The dinosaurs were long gone before the ark.Lol!,lol🐆🐂🐕🐎🐃🦊🦁🐵🐥🐇🐪🐐🐘🦏🐧
That's such an ignorant statement. That presupposition is based upon evilution which is NOT science!
@@cmo0429 I agree!
@@kimbanton4398 then your an idiot....
I thought there were supposed to be seven clean animals.
yes 7 pairs of clean.
That mean 14 ? I always understood this to mean 7 the extra one used for sacrifice and food. Either way Ken Ham never addresses this , he claims 2 of each were put on the Ark. why ? Just did not really read the bible i guess.
@@truethinker221 and is a good place to start. read the bible. :)
@@brumhilda52 How many clean animals do you claim the bible says ?
@@brumhilda52 Just did not really read the bible i guess.
Why would this ark NOT float if there was a flood, as stated in the video?
I thought if you make a replica it has to be the exact same thing. The Bible says it was 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high. That’s 450 ft long 75 ft wide and 45 ft high.
The replica is 510 feet long, 85 feet wide, and 51 feet high.
60ft, 10ft, and 6ft got added extra.
I thought that too.
Fyi, a cubit is a measurement from your elbow to your hand. Not everyone has the same distance. Maybe the man who designed this one has big arms.
Do you really want to say you know for a fact that Noah's arm was a certain length?
Those measurements are relative. Cubits is used so you don't mess up the balance of the entire structue measurement.
Yeah (just like someone else comments) a cubit is a subjective measurement from the elbow to your fingers. Similar to how the Egyptians coined the term foot which now in most measurements has been set to 12 inches. Most people use about 18 inches for a cubit which is what you demonstrated in your 450x75x45x but for the reference of this ark a cubit was measured at 20.4 inches. :)))
ive been there
FOR GOD'S GLORY 🙏🏾
He didn't cover anything about their documentary information.
You mean their religious horse shit.
Covid quarantine was kinda like living on the ark… no?
Im curious to know where they kept all the food for Animals and people to eat for up to a 1yr of living on the ARK. Can the bible tell me that?
Most of theologians believe the animals were hibernating, though some food were stored in the vast space.
If you do a rough calculation, the ark can hold slightly over 100 000 cubic meters of stuff, pretty big.
The answer to the question "why" is? Tourist attraction = Money.
There is a sucker born every minute.
I can tell in your heart you might be soul searching. Why not read the text first to see why. Because it happened
There were no dinosaurs on the ark
Says who, you?
@@cmo0429 ["🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"]
6 comments, 3 likes, and 25 views... fucking RUclips, man!
Why not???
Why... to prove it can be
Look at the back of this, it is a building, not an arc.
Duh. To accommodate tourists, by code. What a dumb thing to point out
There is so much wrong about this entire myth of the arc I really don't think anyone with logic and reason needs that to be pointed out.
God's Word says ' in the last days, men will be scoffers.' When the scoffers stand before God at the Great White Throne Judgement in their future after at least 1000 years of torment and then after the 1000 year reign of Christ on earth, all KNEES will bow. But then it shall be too late. The Lake of Fire awaits them for eternity. Forever, and ever and ever and ever....infinity.
agreed
Are there unicorns in your happy world? Oh yeah! The Bibull does mention unicorns! LMAO.
I hate to say this, but that old guy in the robe lied to you when he told you that you will be immortal.
@ Paul W: That's the old KJV version of the Bible. Deuteronomy 33:17: ''His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns (plural) are like the horns (plural) of unicorns'' So this could refer to a wild horned bovin or a now-extinct aurochs or a bison, maybe a Rhino. It's stupid to think the ancient Hebrews meant the fairytale unicorn, because there's no reason to write down a mythical non-existing creature.
And it seems you find pleasure in this suffering. How Christian.
Jesus said, "If u love Me keep my Commandments", so read this; We have to obey God's ten Commandments, and keep the Sabbath Day Holy, not Sunday day but Sabbath Day on Saturday it's on the seventh Day of the week amen amen and amen ❤. The Sabbath Day for the people of God, so if you not belong to God then you don't need to keep the Sabbath Day Holy, amen)))
If this was an attempt at humor... it failed miserably. If it was an attempt at fiercely arrogant ignorance... He nailed it.
Did it take noah 120 years
The answer to the question why ? Because of money ! Tons of money! Religion is filled with greed!
The animals was not into you 🤣
Noah the great saver by Gods will, really nice idea
I thought from the start, the interviewer was ‘mocking’ the ark, and the possibility of its existence . Maybe the wrong person to do the story IMO. Why is it there? Well anyone who actually reads the Bible and is a Christian can answer this repeating, silly question. Because it helps make what we know happened so real and wonderful and an exciting way to teach children about the story (account) within the Bible. The presentation from someone who obviously was there for the wrong reasons really left a bad taste in my mouth. But it was very cool to see it nonetheless.
it's such a nice, heartwarming story of God creating tons of humans and animals, just deciding one day "fuck 'em all except this bearded dude" so he drowns his creations.
Wouldn't the Ark flood with all the rain falling into it?
The rain washed the road away and Ham is suing the insurance company, should he not sue god?
Talk about an act of god!
Bwahahaha, Keep up the good work of free advertising for The Ark encounter,I'm sure it saves them at least a couple of million a year in advertising.
Or maybe it saves the taxpayers a couple million since they are the ones subsidizing this 500 foot drain on the local economy. Hamm had to lay off a bunch of workers and take out PPP loans to stay afloat(pun intended). The irony of a boat supposedly made to withstand a year of turbulent seas suffering from rain damage, though.....
Why don't any of these believers have anything to say about god causing rain damage?
Wow...good job..really nice
God said 2 of every ,kind, not 2 of every species......True.......
Leviticus 11 goes over that kinds and species are the same thing.
I want to visit!
Idiot.
see
just wondering
if they were inside for a year, what did they eat?
I guess they had gathered grain to make bread or something, but what else...
A terrifying idea comes to mind...did they breed with the 2 animals that came with them ans killed the yound animals for food?
That would destroy the idea of a peaceful venture...
Just wondering
Average human consumes about 400KG of food per year.
Eight of them need only store 3.2 ton to survive easily. If the food are seeds based like grains and nuts, you need even less. I don't see the problem here. Noah's time, eating meats were not as common as today.
Remember there were all the human and animal carcasses floating around and on the scattered ground after the flood. The unclean animals had their job cut out cleaning up.
In some conditions, animals were literally freeze dried at the moment of their deaths.
Ivriah Ja,
How were they freeze dried in a flood?
At 1:55 . . ."KIND OF introducing you to the atmosphere of the ark itself." . . . Yep, "KIND OF" is absolutely accurate. The original Ark did not have air conditioning, electric lighting, sanitized sound effects or a gift shop. Instead, (if a real ark existed), it would have had the nauseating smells of animal feces, very little light, the screaming anguish of the people outside of the ark, and no gifts in the form soft stuffed animals made in China.
Well, yeah! Modernized so people can actually comfortably visit it and see the awesome challenge Noah had, as God commanded. I love all these comments really… of course it’s going to be a modernized version, built to code, to accommodate the anticipated crowds, including plumbing, gifts, foid, and other modern things to support it as a tourist attraction.
A Christian who reads the Bible gets the WHY and appreciates the attempt to give us a sense of what it must have looked and felt like to be inside. Like, c’mon now.
Amen Caren Wenner! 🙂👍
yeah the screams would have been so brutal. can you imagine
@@carenwenner622 . . . .Where in the bible does it command it's followers to build a FAKE Air Conditioned Ark ??
Come on Dose, if you're gonna put the time into producing such nice videos it would be nice to actually learn something.
What is there to learn at a this Ignorance.
Come on DeathBecomesDavid, if you're gonna put in the time into watching a nice, satirical video it would be nice for you to pick up on the joke
its there for a mark for god
Yes, shit sy=tains in your underwear.
I just was checking a website and this skeptic stated the account (she called it "legend" or "myth") of the global Flood of Noah (Genesis 6 to 9) was a corrupted and distorted version of the borrowed Babylonian Flood story ( Epic) of Gilgamesh. I pointed out that if she had actually compared the details of the Gilgamesh Epic with the Genesis account of Noah's Flood, she would have discovered it is the other way around; namely, the Epic of Gilgamesh is a distorted and corrupted reflection of divine revelation--the true record of the Genesis Flood. Read my comment as to why.
You guys talk about evidence, but you would not know real EVIDENCE if you saw it. The dimensions of the vessel in the Gilgamesh Epic (see lines 29 and 30, compare lines 57 and 58) were 10 rods high x 10 rods wide x 10 rods long or 165 ft x 165 ft x 165 ft (1 rod=16 1/2 feet); in other words the shape of a cube or square box, which would not have been very stable in a global flood of very turbulent and high waves. Compare this to the dimensions of Noah's Ark, which were 300 cubits x 50 cubits x 30 cubits or 450 feet long by 75 feet wide by 45 feet high, and which shipbuilders calculate would give a ratio of 6:1; in other words, a ship, with a rectangular or barge shape and a very low center of gravity, that was so stable that when they did experiments using a scaled-down prototype of the Ark in a water tank (laboratory) producing assimilated waves, they discovered it could upright itself from a 90 degree tilt--a ship that could stay float in over 100 ft waves, much larger than average oceanic waves today. Of course, the weight of the animals, which would have put it lower in the water, would have made it even more stable. The U.S. battleship Oregon was built around the turn of the century using the same ratio (6:1) in construction as that of Noah's Ark.
Let's look at other details of the Gilgamesh Epic. The ship in the Gilgamesh Epic has 6 decks (line 60) whereas the Ark in Genesis had 3 decks. Also, the flood in the Gilgamesh Epic lasted one week only (lines 127-130)---hardly sufficient to bring about a global cataclysmic flood as evidenced by the worldwide distribution of billions of fossils of all life-forms. The Genesis Flood on the other hand, lasted 150 days (including the 40-days and 40-nights of rain) before the flood waters abated or receded. Finally, the Genesis account tells us that the dove brought a freshly plucked olive tree to Noah--tangible evidence that the flood waters had receded from the earth--whereas the Gilgamesh Epic tells us that the raven, which saw the waters receding and found food, did not return to the ship (line 156). How then did Utanapishti know for sure that the flood waters had actually receded? He could only have assumed because the raven did not return that it saw the flood waters receding and found food, but could not have known for certain, as did Noah, without some tangible evidence.
Some skeptics and liberal theologians would have us believe that the Jews who wrote the Bible actually borrowed myths of Babylonian origin concerning the Genesis Flood from the Gilgamesh Epic (and others) to include with their own writings. However, the big problem with this assumption, as we (and biblical historians) have observed in our comparison of the Gilgamesh Epic with the Genesis Flood, is that the latter (*Genesis Flood) is far more reasonable and believable than the former. The details of the Gilgamesh Epic, which merely reflects the true record of the Bible (divine revelation), are clearly the ones that have become corrupted and distorted due to limitations of human fallibility.
Obviously stories handed down from generation to generation that are not carefully preserved--particularly if they are handed down by word of mouth--do not improve with age. The truth is lost and the stories degenerate markedly. On the other hand, the biblical records have been handed down in written form (though there was a slight period of oral transmission in its early history), carefully preserved by the superintendency of God and have not been corrupted. Assuming our ancient past was very primitive and over a long period of time, we must ask ourselves how certain details of the story of the Great Flood or Deluge (read Genesis 6 to 9) could have been handed down from one primitive stone-age culture to another purely by oral tradition, for hundreds of thousands of years (Gilgamesh cuneiform tablets date as far back as 4,000 years), to be fully incorporated in the Gilgamesh Epic of the Babylonians. That such a thing could have happened over a hundred thousand years is quite inconceivable. No, the only conclusion clearly indicated by careful comparison of the details of the Gilgamesh Epic (which clearly have become corrupted and distorted with time) with the details of the Genesis Flood (which undoubtedly are far more reasonable and believable) is that the Epic of Gilgamesh is a distorted and corrupted reflection of divine revelation--the true record of the Genesis Flood (given by God to Moses--the author of the first five books of the Bible, including Genesis, from the time of creation to the world-wide flood of Noah. Also, as Dr. John Whitcomb has rightly pointed out, "The Gilgamesh Epic, rightly considered, administers a fatal blow to the concept of a vast antiquity for Noah" (DR. John C. Whitcomb in the Early Earth).
Note: The divine inspiration of the Bible would demand that the Genesis account is the correct version. Indeed, the Hebrews were known for handing down their records and tradition. The Book of Genesis is viewed for the most part as an historical work, even by many liberal scholars, while the Epic of Gilgamesh is viewed as mythological. The One-source Theory must, therefore, lead back to the historical event of the Flood and Noah's Ark. To those who believe in the inspiration and infallibility of the Bible, it should not be a surprise that God would preserve the true account of the Flood in the traditions of His people. The Genesis account was kept pure and accurate throughout the centuries by the providence of God until it was finally compiled, edited, and written down by Moses. The Epic of Gilgamesh, then, contains the corrupted account as preserved and embellished by peoples who did not follow the God of the Hebrews.
gilgamesh was made before the bible scrub
That was an epically long response to refute one fake legend with another. On your next post please do the tooth fairy and leprechauns.
Or maybe unicorns...
hmm certainly looks very cool and interesting. Shame I see so much modern methods of construction in it like steel plates, bolts and laminated frames etc looks more like a modern building in the shape of a ship than something that could actually float. I don't know, back in the day this looks to be on a scale even greater than all the pyramids combined, how could this have been built back then without huge international effort and spectacular amounts of cash? you know this thing is more than half the length of the Titanic and just as wide! Would the Ark really have been this colossal? if it was a third this size then ok that might have been doable, I just think the scale is waaaaay off for the time. Like watching Pirates of the Caribbean and some pirate turns up with the Bismarck, what?! where did you get that made?? It would however be great to visit though however the ticket price is a bit steep.
Why?
Because it happened!
Why?
Because it’s history!
Why?
Because- ITS fun!
Inside jk. "Why this is here" basically saying the story is fake, so there was 0 need to build that ark 🤣
Would have loved to hear this interview from a believer
How can it be a replica when there was no original?
Blessed are those who accepts the salvation of Jesus Christ and believe in the living Word of God.
Fleeced are the sheep that believe this shit and send their money.
truly blessed--sad to see the fighting and arguing and immaturity here. Follow Christ and you'll truly find peace--and miracles. I have them daily.
Awesome guys well done, congrats to all.
Best 1/1000th scale model of an ark I have ever seen, so when are you going to build an ark to the true size that would have been needed, the 25,000ft long, 10 million ton Ark, Noah would have actually needed. How come no one ever talks about Dragons, Orcs, Ogre's, Elves and Fairies on the ark.
For your next fantasy fiction build I have some Suggestions
Hogwarts
An Imperial Death Star from Star Wars
The USS Enterprise from Star Trek
The Wall from Game of Thrones
That would be awesome and you may even attract some people with an IQ above 50 to your park.
This is what happens when grown ups think like children ( and have never had a science class) how did Noah get kangaroos from Australia? LOL
Who said that kangaroos were in australia back then! You're just an intolerant darwinian troll! Go away, kiddo!
Haha, he had time he lived to be 600, bible says so, gotta be true
Kimbanton,
I'm going out on a limb here but I'm guessing the fossil record says kangaroos were in australia!
As soon as someone confronts your delusion with fact you have a buddy fit. I really don't think that is what your Jesus would do.
...just like Noah did it...
Morgoth from Angband awesome haha, fucking Noah, he did it all! Dinosaurs and zip lines!
NOAH AND THE FLOOD
For me, sending an angel to do one’s dirty work doesn’t compute - especially when the individual in question is supposedly God Himself.
Imagine how much more powerful God's message would be if he simply spoke to everyone on Earth directly and all at once, “I’m disappointed in you sinful ingrates and I’m about to wipe out all but a handful of you with a 40-day flood.”
Then again, who is left to heed that message if you just killed everyone? The answer is, a handful of people who aren’t sinful in the first place or they wouldn’t be on the boat, outnumbered by thousands of animals who don’t speak human languages and are wondering what’s with all the rain...
Even before this, why would a god able to create Earth in one day need 40 days to wipe it out? And even before that, why would a god who created a flawed model not correct the flaws and replace man with a model that has both a free will AND is sin-proof?
The suggestion is that a free-willed, sin-proofed human cannot be created -- or at least not by the current god, meaning the current god is either limited in his own abilities - which makes no sense -- or delights in intentionally creating a sinful man on whom he is then able to inflict retribution, which makes even less sense.
None of this is blasphemous, much as it will be seem to be to some readers. It DEFENDS the God I believe in, who is a creator, not a destroyer.
You have No idea what your talking about don't put yourself in the place of GOD and use your human point of view to try and rationalize the mind OF GOD.
@@jackclark9812 Just because you don't have a grasp for Science, facts and logic doesn't exclude the rest of humanity from having one. One doesn't need to believe he is God in order to exercise logic, math and Science, which is all I've done. Folks like you are the pinnacle of hypocrisy. You want to murder anything about Science until you get that pain in your chest and run to the hospital and have a cadre of doctors and nurses attending you with the hundreds of machines, medicines and procedures Science has put there. Suddenly all your talk and squawk about God is forgotten and all you care about is being saved === by SCIENCE. If you live, it's because of prayer and fk Science; if you die your family and friends will declare "God wanted you sooner" or "He works in mysterious ways" or something similarly divorced from the Science that either saved you or was unable to address your condition. You God sends you to the hospital and wastes everybody's time and energy. My God just takes me and is done. If I linger or even recuperate He has nothing to do with saving me....it's the doctors and nurses and the Scientific equipment and medications that do. This is the same science that puts Mt. Sainai at over 16k feet, meaning (for anyone with a brain who didn't drop out of 8th grade) that the flood waters that put it there would have to been 16k feet deep --- WORLDWIDE, in which case NO ONE would have survived (a few trees growing on the mountains, perhaps). The sole purpose SLOWLY drowning everyone and everything in the world instead of quickly doing so with the snap of His finger, makes your God cruel and unjust. He is, after all, the creator of all, including the human model. Whatever flaws it has, He made. Cutting to the chase, He might just as easily have made the human Free-Willed and Sin-Proof instead of Free-Willed and Sin-Prone. HIS CALL. HIS DECISION. I don't buy your God because if He did this knowing man would sin (instead of making it impossible for man to sin, which he could have done), then He did so for 1 of 2 reasons: He wanted to have people to send into eternal flames forever and watch them suffer, or He is INCAPABLE of having created a human model that was both Free-Willed and Sin-Proof. Either of those you choose falls short of an omnipotent God, which is why I believe in a God, just not yours and certainly not the silly, nonsensical stores and myths about Him that your bible espouses. And finally let me just point out to you that the problem with all the Gods of the world are the fault of the 4,600 religions and 2,500 bibles of our world. They can't all be right but ask anyone who believes in them and follows them and they will tell you THEIR God and THEIR bible is the only "right one". WHere does all this go, in that case? Look in the mirror and ask the image there, "Do I really need a God in order not to sin? Were it proved tomorrow, positively, that there is no God, would I then start stealing? Killing? Lying? Cheating? Or would I instead continue to excercise common, decent morals? " We do not NEED a God in order to be moral. That's not to cast doubt on the belief in the existence of a God, but rather to point to the hypocricy of man, who refuses to be RESPONSIBLE FOR SELF and chooses instead to blame a Devil for his misdeeds. He gets to do this all week long, then on Sunday, go to "church" where a man in a costume supposedly forgives him. YIPPPPPPPEEEE! He now has a whole new week in which to be sinful all over again, knowing that next Sunday he'll swear he didn't mean it, swear he's sorry, swear he seeks forgiveness and walks out of church -- headed for the bar. Mind you, not all of us are like that, just most of us. And in summary, if you live a generally good and loving life --- a moral life -- and die without believing in a God or having doubt about a God or having a different belief entirely in who and what God is -- and it turns out that there IS a God, every bit as selfish and self-centered as the Christian Bible (falsely in my opinon) makes him out to be, and he still send you to suffer in eternal flames, then that God is neither a just or loving God. He should be replaced by a truly loving and just God, removed from office, fired, and sold into slavery for retraining. So you see, it's not that I don't believe in God, I don't believe in YOUR God or a bunch of silly stories and myths in the bibles of the world. I DEFEND GOD against these silly stories and myths and demand that man get rid of the convenience of a Devil. Until man becomes RESPONSIBLE FOR SELF and stops using a Devil for his excuse to sin, nothing will change -- and the billions upon billions upon trillions of prayers that go unanswered will only continue growing in number. So too will the belief that at the end of a world-wide flood, animals like the pair of polar bears had to somehow find their way back to the ice caps, same for lions and giraffes and tigers who had to find their way down a 16k foot mountain and get back to their native land....having NOTHING to eat coz everything had been drowned. I could go on and on and on but there is no point if you aren't going to wake up and realize that there is NO Pair of shoulders in our world that doesn't have a HEAD on them. Must have been put there for a purpose (which would eliminate someone else using it for you).
@@jameslacey460 HAHA, wow you got very worked up! Didn't you?!?!, you don't know anything about ME what I am or what I have degrees in.
Don't get so excited when someone shakes your reality, that was QUITE a rant you went on I wasn't trying to stir you up. Relax.
@@jackclark9812 You didn't "stir me up". I take pleasure in getting people to THINK and if you read my response -- which you did -- then I succeeded. Welcome to logic. Welcome to using your own mind. You can still believe in God and not they mythology and my guess is that He'd appreciate another member of Earth willing to defend Him. =)
@@jameslacey460 your mind is much more Closed than you think mine is.
Long life to you.
It's a Replica?? .. they copied the original?? LOL!!!!
They copied the description of the History book called the bible.
@@michaelcrowley9008 the Bible narrative, fact or fiction, doesn't provide hardly any design details, no replica can be built that matches what is not even defined. Ham's monstrosity Ark, ain't a boat, its a building that only mimics the Biblical Ark story length, width and height, woopdie doo!!! Which BTW exceed ANY wooden ship ever actually built man .. the largest being the Wyoming, which had metal bracing and leaked so much water it required steam engines to pump the water out, and it eventually sank at Sea in 1924. There is no reason to believe the huge Bible story Ark was factual, it is only part of an allegorical story, never intended to be historically accurate, obviously ... if ya can't understand how to read your own Bible, what good is it?
Interesting! I remember Disney parks got a lot of grief too! Time will tell as to how successful,......heck if it doesn’t pay for itself,..could be a great hotel,.....or casino that would be interesting! Or some multi millionaire named Noah will buy it!
Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female. Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.
Genesis 7:2-3
I guess Noah physically inspected each animal thats roughly 7.7 million to verify it's sex and we can only hope that none of the animals were gay and had no desire to reproduce with the opposite sex.
Why do you find all the penguins (every single one) down in Antartica and nowhere else? How did they get there so fast and not one settled somewhere else.
Why do you find kangaroos only in Australia and nowhere else? How did they get across the water barrier?
Did Noah have sex with his daughters in law.
Did Noah's wife bear any of her grandchildren?
It's certain that Noah's children practiced incest. They had to.
Did God really have to kill everybody except Noah and his wife and children? Don't you love it when your loving god kills all the little laughing children to satisfy his genocidal lust?
Cue some lunatic to post that the world is only a bit over 6000 years old. Hahahahaha. Gee that would be a coherent thought.🙄
wallabies at the Noah theme park? what a joke. pathetic...where are the penguins? I'm sure they walked all the way from Antarctica to the middle east? pretending Dinosaurs existed as well (when in fact they existed 50 Million years ago, is deceitful).
Hundreds of thousands of guest?! The video shows an all but empty attraction. But its a xtian video I expect nothing less than "false" information.
John Donahue - John. a little STUPID, aren't you?
Good one. The only VERY BIG is your ignorance. Ballard's village don't mean crap. Now run along and et the adults speak.
john donahue - evolutionist by and large are too stupid to be ashamed :)
paul w - yea it doesnt mean crap to you if it contradicts your pet theory of idiocy. you ignore evidence to accept a fairy tale.
I'm sorry this guy was such a clown.
This earth is millions of years old and in the first earth age GOD destroyed it. There were no dinosaurs on Noah's Ark. They were here in the first earth age Not the second earth age. Job 4 refers to dinosaurs as behemoths
4.54 billion years old is the earths age , give or take some million years.
@@hornborgland1655 Nope! Our earth is according to the chronology in human history only about 6000 years old! Those dating results are all purely interpretated because the radiometrical methods are only relieable on closed systems! But our earth is an opened system! In order for the dating methods to really get the right age of our earth, we should know all the exact states of the last 4.54 billion years! But how do we know? We weren't there the last 4.54 billion years to observe and/or document everything! So HOW?
Well... the answer is easy: WE DON'T!!! We have NO evidence for the made-up periodes! NOTHING! The only thing we have is PHANTASY!!! The evolutionists build the random dating methods on their phantasies and sell their lies as facts to us through the media! So the earth dating methods all fail!
And have you ever heard of the volcano eruption of Mt. St. Helens on May 18th 1980! New soils were discovered that formed in only few HOURS after the eruption and were completely stoned in a few MONTHS!
NOT in many billion years! Also whole tree trucks were found fossilized! How can that be happening? Depending on the tree kind, wood rot and fully decompose after a maximum of 30 years! But if the fossilization process really takes millions to billions of years, then HOW can those WHOLE trees with their trucks could be fossilized before decomposing? Well... maybe the answer would be that fossils are NOT billions of years old!
@@kimbanton4398 people like u are not sane. U dont accept fact. How ild is the sun . How old is our galaxy. Its calculated and messured in test and math. But i will never be abel to convince you that u belive i. A book and not god. But nothing was made in 7 day or any of yor crazy idears grow up
@@hornborgland1655 You ignorant fool! I just gave you observed and documented evidence against the old earth and you still believe in it! As I already explained, mathematical and radiometrical dating methods can NOT be used for the earth age because they only work at...
1) ... closed systems and our earth is definitely NOT closed, but it's opened!
2) ... opened systems where you know ALL of the states from the past EXACTLY! Question: How do the scientists know all the "old-earth"-periodes if they weren't there to see it? Answer: THEY DON'T! They just ASSUME that and build their dating results on those assumptions! So they do NOT know that the earth is 4.54 billion years old, but they BELIEVE it! You first gotta know all the states of the opened system and THEN date it! Sooooooo... the most scientific academies lie to us! They indoctrinate us to their religion through media!
The scientists distort science through their lies and abuse it for their ideological intensions! And every of their action they justify with the famous sentence "It's scientifically proven! Everyone who doesn't acknowledge the big bang, the old earth, the theory of evolution and abiogenesis, is not a human!".
So the earth is NOT flat! And the observations and fundings after the eruption of the Mt. Saint Helens proved that already 30 years ago! But if you still wanna elieve in the materialistic religion that nothing created everything, then who am I to burst your bubble?
@@kimbanton4398 Tell Mureybit, Cafer Hüyük and Tell Abu Hureyrai. Are all around 11.000 years old. Jeriko and Catal Hüyük had for 9.000 eyars ago around 10.000 people living in a city... Shaqarat Maziyad in Jordan is 10.000 years old. And moses there talk about Adam and eve didnt live at that time :) or even on a 6000 year ol earth :D Sicne that story is stolen from Mesopotamien, there already for 9-10.000 year5s ago had people, cities etc. The bible have stolen most stories from there. Also about Noah. But the earth is far older like i told you. And only people there belive in a copy book belive in such !
This attraction has failed.
Colin12475 no it hasn't
Just wait a few years and it will be bankrupt.
Colin12475 no it wont. You are assuming. People thought Disney land would go bankrupt when it first started in 1955. It hasnt. This won't.
Just wait.
collin - evolution is already bankrupt---morally bankrupt and factually bankrupt
Russian version is better.
I doubt that they really believe that shit.
Morgoth - thats what I think sometimes about evolutionists...but then they prove they do believe that crap...and their IQ's prove it.
Evolution is just a biochemical process on our planet, it's very simple and proven and has nothing to do with believe.
It also doesn't disprove the god-theorie.
Do ya want the answer? Business, money, using peoples religion to make money its symple
no one has to use religion to love things to do with God and the bible .... this is wonderful and if it will get people interested and wanting to read the bible ....then, that is what it is all about.
@@brumhilda52 This is a group pushing propaganda against modern science and doesn't represent the Ark narrative.
I'm sorry but there's no way no way no way that a man and his sons whom didn't know nothing about ship building made this. no way no way no way! and on top of that collected 2 of each animal (unless he sailed over to other continents to pick them up) come on this is so flipping stupid and so made up wow
That's what they said about the African pyramids that men built without scientific knowledge. Hmm
@@singerspeak1 If all those people helped build it why didn't they get in ?
@@truethinker221 You can go inside some of the pyramids..what are you talking about?
@@singerspeak1 All the people that built the Ark. If you are comparing it to the pyramids.
@@truethinker221 Noah built the ark and only his family and animals got in it. So idk what you're talking about regarding the ark and all those people.
Your bias is obvious.
Why? To con the gullible
Jackassman - the gullible have already been conned...by evolution...the belief of idiots.
You're going to have to excuse rusda2. This person obviously can't distinguish fact from fiction. The idiot comments on evolution when clearly the video has nothing to do with it, so you get the idea of the mentality you're dealing with.
What month did the Ark come to rest on dry land ?
Paul W - I am amazed by your complete and utter gullible idiocy. you are on thinking level with a turnip stump.
The video has everything to do with evolution . It is designed to destroy the theory of Evolution by trying to prove the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Although it being a "replica" of the ark is questionable, one has to admire the dedication in building such a project. Something I don't admire is yet another reporter making fun of something he obviously doesn't respect. You ask "why"? Snide reporters is not the reason. The reason is to serve as a major attraction and-- for those who care to do so-- offer a learning opportunity and memorable experience. And in case the reporter isn't aware of it: Kentucky is not the middle of nowhere. Asking why it was built in Kentucky is rather naive, isn't it? The answer is simple: Kentucky is a well-known tourist-attraction state. This is an extremely poor example of unbiased journalism. In other words "dose"... I could have done without the snide. So thumbs down on this one.
This utter bullshit isn't worthy of respect.
To promote a fractured fairy tale.
slartibarfbag - yes thats why we have all these evolutionary fairy tale museums...to promote the evolution fairy tale.
+rusda2 yeah that's right, we can squeeze those dinosaurs into the museums but you can't fit them on the ark. Why? The ark is bullshit. Such a fanciful story , I just don't understand that these creationists can't see the facts. So blinkered.
startbarfbag - funny evolutionists can squeeze all those dino's into museums but they cant squeeze a coherent thought out of their brains.
+rusda2 when you say coherent thought are you talking about how you deny how it is just not possible to fit all the animals into an ark, don't worry about it being impossible to build, feed the animals, prevent them from eating one another, sewerage issues. How is the world suddenly covered by so much water then it just disappears. The planet earth is a locked system, there is a finite amount of water. I know all these questions are above your intellect so just focus on telling me how the dinosaurs fit into and ark,? Even though modern human never walked the earth with these animals.
Slarti - lol...yes it is possible...very possible. see your type doesnt think logically. for example, not every breed of dog we see today was included on the ark. not every breed of bird, etc etc etc. that vastly cuts down on the space needed.
impossible to build? are you kidding me??? lol you look at all the incredible things men build today but you think it was impossible for men back then to build a SIMPLE boat??? yes it was big, but it was simple and no where near impossible to build.
impossible to feed? have you read the bible at all? why do you think the clean animals were brought on by 7 pairs rather than just 2 pair for the unclean? many were used for food. most of the animals on earth are not carnivorous so most of the food stores where of plant origin, grains, beans etc. the deck of the boat could have easily been covered in containers containing fruit and vegetable plants.
as for eating one another, there is this thing at the zoo called a CAGE which is usually more than adequate to keep animals separated...lol. honestly friend, do you even THINK before you post this stuff?
sewage? oh come on dude, THINK. all they had to do is general farm work, just daily mucking out the stalls/cages and tossing the poop overboard. a lot of work yes but not impossible...very possible actually. as for the people, if they didnt want to sit hanging over the side, they could use a bucket...they did have those back then, and then again toss it overboard. no big deal. impossible? hardly.
God is how the world was covered with so much water. under the earth are huge stores of water which the bible says were "broken up" and sent to the surface. can you imagine the hydraulic pressure released from the billions of tons of rock and dirt pressing down on the water? God is the Creator of the earth, He certainly knows how to accomplish a flood and where to get the water from. this not including the torrential downpours that accompanied the explosive underground water sources.
I get the feeling you think the water just went away overnight. that is not what the bible says. it took a while after the rain stopped before any land showed...it had to evaporate. sun and wind did its thing. and even after they landed the water continued evaporating till we got where we are now. how this basic stuff escapes you guys is beyond me. everyone with a swimming pool knows water evaporates...lol...and very quickly in hot windy weather.
apparently every simple thing you asked is above your intellect...lol.
even to there are over 600 names for dinos, there are only about 50 kinds of dinos. see you guys ASSume that every single breed of every animal we see today had to fit on the ark. that is assumption and very bad logic for people like you who claim to be logical. same as the dog illustration I gave above. the dinos could have been brought on as eggs or very young, which would not require near the space.
friend I understand what the reason for atheism and evolution and all these godless beliefs you guys have is. you are terrified of God. you are terrified what will happen if its true. you want to live your life without any possibility of being responsible for your thoughts and actions in this life. well I am sorry for you. you have a hard lesson to learn if you stick with your silly fairy tale evolutionary religious beliefs. and evolution IS a religion of faith. no proof. pure faith.
any thinking man with an ounce of common sense knows that it is impossible for all the infinitely complex interworking systems of the human body, animals, nature, universe etc to have happened by accident. and that it is idiotic to think that life just "self generated' from non life. preposterous.
why are their footprints of man inside a dino track if man never walked with dinos?
where are all the currently in process examples of apelike creatures evolving into men? if its true we should see millions of them in different evolutionary stages. but what have we got? NOT ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE. NONE. NO ONE has EVER seen an apelike creature at all, let alone one evolving into a man. good day.
Whilst the story of Noah’s Ark is clearly ludicrous, if it WAS true, then that makes god the worst genocidal maniac of all time.
That just proves that Noah was very talented at ship building, because he built a huge Ark for all the animals! He deserves a spot in heaven where we can serve at Lord Jesus's feet for eternity, amen.
Delusion much?
The ark story is actully not from the bible, but borrowed from another religion. But 4.54 billion years old , and was created just like the sun from pasts off a old supernova or gas cloud
Another Christian money making amusement park....
Why not invest millions to create a talking walking snake as well. Buffoonery
Jason Williams And a donkey.....
Why the Ark? Because atheists put their belief in something that violates basic Biology 101 - that nonliving stuff became a living thing. Religious people freely admit their faith while atheists lie and deny using their faith even though they do. Either way, EVERYONE uses FAITH. Rather than have unscientific beliefs like "nonliving stuff became a living thing" which violates basic principles of biology, the Ark gives people an alternate view. Also, if being an atheist makes people bigoted and hateful in the process, who wants that in their life?
Because people need to know there is a Creator in heaven. Men without God failed, and became so corrupted, God had to destroy them. The same thing is happening right now, and Christ will return to save those like Noah.
agree with you
King Hill - You must be from the deep south - aka Dumfukistan. Please don't reproduce.
Full scale replica of a fairy tale? No such thing.