The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
You do know the ark was around 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high(300 cubits, 50 cubits, 30 cubits). They were in the ark for a year, which most measurements is around 365 days. Just for one pair of horse it is several tons to feed them for a year. Hopefully the food doesn't spoil and they brought enough to sustained the animal for the time after they departed. What kind of formula did you use to get that number from?
No, the Ark used the Egyptian cubit, which was around 20.64 inches, so the Ark would have been much bigger, it was around 516 feet long, 86 feet wide and 51.6 feet high
RUclips : Low Tech Bible Discovries RUclips: Ron Wyatt If your not not Afraid Take the challenge Note: they were not anchors the are roll Stones , they did not hang them from the bottom of the ark , they are like are Modern day Paravaine.
The ark was about to leave for Brazil ( on the back of a barge for health and safety reasons, although I think it would sink) but someone ran into the side of it and made a hole.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
A 600-foot high tsunami would surely leave behind a geological calling card -- and that it did. When waves are generated by such a significant impact, they create wedge-shaped configurations in the sand, known as chevrons, and when the Holocene Impact Working Group went looking for them with satellite imagery, they were able to locate such formations in Africa and Asia.
National Geographic Society explorer Robert Ballard, inspired by Ryan and Pitman's hypothesis, has discovered supporting physical evidence, including an underwater river valley and ancient shoreline as well as Stone Age structures and tools beneath the Black Sea. His team has also unearthed fossils of now-extinct freshwater species dating back some 7,460 to 15,500 years
When one looks into history one can see so many global flood stories from so many different cultures its amazing. It's also amazing people that call themselves intelligent disrespectful to other people who all have valid opinion shame shame shame.
@@mauriceguymoi The book of Genesis is real. People who say that it's not real only because they don't truly understand it. I'm actually making a documentary film on Noah's Ark; and for 2 years I've made more discoveries and accurate theories then most professional biblical experts would. When I read the book of Genesis I picture whatever it says in my mind in order to understand it more clearly. Doing this trick might help you better understand the book of Genesis.
God always does what is right. Though something can be unfortunate that it has to occur, God would have never done this extreme punishment, if it was not necessary to do. Note that though the wicked are many, even as it was in Sodom and Gomorrah, going with the popular crowd is not always wise, if the majority is doing unrighteousness. God will not be unjust by punishing the righteous with the unrighteous. A righteous judge must pronounce judgment against evildoers. It does not make the judge evil, but the judge is necessary to keep righteousness preserved in the earth, and a good and righteous judge is honest and true.
It is appalling to think that people would waste over $100 Million for a myth instead of building god knows how many hospitals for the needy or sending Dr.s to help the poor and ill of the world; it's almost criminal and shame on these idiots. How many times must it be shown that the ark is a myth. It was demonstrated in 1777 by Eberhart Zimmerman (google it). That was 243 years ago and yet today ignoramuses still purport this insanity. It's simple; A ship stranded on a high mountain where there is no vegetation (High altitude) or killed vegetation (Mud, salt water, little vegetation to start with), will not sustain a troupe of Herbivores. Let them loose on this island on a mountain and they will die of starvation, but before they do, the predators will eat them all in a swift swoop. If they eat but one of a couple (male or female) it's doom for that species. Finally, what ever the scenario, it ends up in a mass extinction. And, that is why the whole thing is a myth, which by the way the Pope admitted to in the late 18th century. Pass the word along once and for all.
It is appalling to think that people would waste over $100 Million for a myth instead of building god knows how many hospitals for the needy or sending Dr.s to help the poor and ill of the world; it's almost criminal and shame on these idiots. How many times must it be shown that the ark is a myth. It was demonstrated in 1777 by Eberhart Zimmerman (google it). That was 243 years ago and yet today ignoramuses still purport this insanity. It's simple; A ship stranded on a high mountain where there is no vegetation (High altitude) or killed vegetation (Mud, salt water, little vegetation to start with), will not sustain a troupe of Herbivores. Let them loose on this island on a mountain and they will die of starvation, but before they do, the predators will eat them all in a swift swoop. If they eat but one of a couple (male or female) it's doom for that species. Finally, what ever the scenario, it ends up in a mass extinction. And, that is why the whole thing is a myth, which by the way the Pope admitted to in the late 18th century. Pass the word along once and for all.
I do like that he doesn't say anything like "This is a mission from god." He kinda treats it like... well, a hobby. I can't dislike this if it's done for fun or to make a profit from tourists.
Geological events that alter sea level will be more to do with changing the shape of the ocean bed. For example an earthquake which raises the ocean floor by 2 feet will raise the sea by the same amount. Obviously this would only occur if all the Worlds ocean floors were raised but the raising of one area of sea floor will raise the average sea level, if only by a tiny amount. Over long periods of time this could add up to a significant alteration is sea level. Sounds like flooding aftermath.
That would survive 300ft waves for sure... Easily would sail through twice the size of this planets highest ocean waves during storms. Would sail without a bumpy ride.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
The Ark itself was seaworthy, but not enough to waves bigger than it, so it had drogue stones to keep it stable and not sink it. The real Ark wasn't 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet tall as many say, the Ark used a cubit that measured 20.64 inches, so it's real size would be 516 feet long, 86 feet wide and 51.6 feet tall.
As the ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
It's not just "some guy", these are well respected oceanographers and archeaologists, not some crack-heads. I always thought that water evaoporated, call me crazy. If water evaporates, isn't there a chance that there once was water in the pyramids? You have obviously never heard of the water-erosion affect in Egypt, and although it is not specifically aimed at the pyramids, I think that it applies here. Go to wikipedia and type in Sphinx water erosion hypothesis.
Darwin’s theory is natural selection. He didn’t “invent” the theory of evolution. Heck, his grandfather Erasmus was a proponent of evolution vs. the cataclysmic theory, of which a universal flood was considered a major cause.
the number doesn't matter, it never happened. It is appalling to think that people would waste over $100 Million for a myth instead of building god knows how many hospitals for the needy or sending Dr.s to help the poor and ill of the world; it's almost criminal and shame on these idiots. How many times must it be shown that the ark is a myth. It was demonstrated in 1777 by Eberhart Zimmerman (google it). That was 243 years ago and yet today ignoramuses still purport this insanity. It's simple; A ship stranded on a high mountain where there is no vegetation (High altitude) or killed vegetation (Mud, salt water, little vegetation to start with), will not sustain a troupe of Herbivores. Let them loose on this island on a mountain and they will die of starvation, but before they do, the predators will eat them all in a swift swoop. If they eat but one of a couple (male or female) it's doom for that species. Finally, what ever the scenario, it ends up in a mass extinction. And, that is why the whole thing is a myth, which by the way the Pope admitted to in the late 18th century. Pass the word along once and for all.
There are around 225 global flood stories, I didn't favor one myth over another in that calculation. Though that formula was in response to the claim of the population double every 150 years. However, the food supply for herbivores would be non-existent and and carnivores' would become existent within a year. Just using your data and the lower limit of the estimate population(7 million) during 4000 B.C.E. there is a 874999% increase of the population over a 400 year span.
That is not Bible no windows except one in the top an one door an God sealed them and you better read your Bible again get the facts straights 1 windows one door you didn't see through the eyes of Noah God told him how to build the ark in side may be OK, but outside is not Wright miss in one point you must miss all the other God doesn't make mistake God is always right no mistake Wright all the time that's why He is God
Noah's Ark did exist, non-believers, it's on one of the mountains of Ararat, almost gone by now, it is on a place called Durupinar site, the Ark looked like 2 rectangular boxes, the higher the smaller, in a canoe/boat hull, it was made out of gopher wood, covered inside and outside with pitch for waterproofing, it had drogue stones hanging on it's back to keep it stable on extremely tough seas; it's size was 300 cubits long (516 feet), 50 cubits wide (86 feet) and 30 cubits tall (51.6 feet), it used a cubit that measured 20.64 inches. You would probably say the Durupinar site has a natural formation, but it has too much evidence of being Noah's Ark, so it's NOT a natural formation.
(Just for fun).... When the information of a DNA molecule (DNA coding) is copied, the source of the info in that copy always goes back to the mind from which it was created. The laws of information say that information has to come from somewhere/something, it can not be spontanenous or come from natural selection. =)
I have to wonder why you're even on here to begin with. I mean, if you don't believe in this stuff, why are you watching this? There's no point. Going back to one of my earlier posts, an oceanographer is one who studies WATER, just saying. If he is an oceanographer, shouldn't he know what the hell he's talking about? The thing that amazes me about you non-believers, is even if someone has provided you with evidence like I have, you still don't believe and most likely never will. Why watch it?
...according to the Bible, God sent two each of the "unclean" beasts, but the "clean" animals He sent in groups of sevens (Ge 7:2). The catholics teach their own perversion of this wonderful story of redemption and this is why it is so important to go directly to the Word of God...
At 5:05 did this guy say people don’t make “these” things up? REALLY?!? People haven’t been making up stories since person a could communicate with person b? When you are 100% bent on being wrong, you sure can find ways to make it happen. Dumb story for gullible people.
What about the ice age? Frozen water covering the planet. How did water cover the WHOLE planet. If it is improbable to have a flood covering the whole planet, wouldn't that by extention make the ice age improbable? Because, whether it's the flood or the ice age, it's still water covering the whole planet.....
Yes there was, it is on Durupinar site, one of the mountains of the Ararat region, it is a mountainous valley and the Ark is in it, almost gone by now and fossilized, it has a lot of evidence that proves it's the real one, it's size is 516 feet long, 86 feet wide and 51.6 feet tall, it looked like two rectangular boxes on a canoe/boat hull, the higher the smaller, it also had drogue stones hung on it's back for keeping it stable on very tough seas.
It is a structure built upon barges. Floating is not sailing. Not two of every animal. Two of every "unclean" animal and fourteen of every "clean" animal. Genesis 7:2-3 "Of every clean beast you shall take with you seven by seven, the sire and his dam, and of the beast that is not clean, of them pairs, the sire and his dam. Also, of the clean flyer of the heavens seven by seven, male and female, and of the flyer that is not clean, of them pairs, male and female, to keep seed alive on the surface of the entire earth." Adam did not know his Bible not very well. Nine year later, he may. 3:03 I do not ask why. Why implies intent. Weather has no intent. 3:14 I just get over it as quickly as possible. No need for fairly tales and nonsensical stories to sooth my feels. There is no meaning to be found in the Bible. It is a collection of 66 books written by, for and about men. 3:44 Oh no. You are so wrong. God destroyed everything on the face of the Earth because Yahweh regretted creating humans. He did not regret destroying them and everything else with them. genesis 6:7 "Yahweh regretted that He had made humanity on earth, and He grieved in His heart." 1 Samuel 15:10-11 "The word of Yahweh came to Samuel, saying, I regret that I caused Saul to reign as king, for he has turned away from following Me and has not carried out My words. Now Samuel grew angry, and he cried out to Yahweh all that night." 1 Samuel 15:35 "Samuel did not come again to see Saul until the day of his death, though Samuel mourned for Saul, because Yahweh regretted that He had made Saul king over Israel." There are flood stories all over because localized floods have and still happen almost everywhere. Demonstrate the existence of Yahweh.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
@@richardwebb2348 Very disingenuous. I checked this out and I invite others to as well. It lacked necessary certificates ( anti-fouling and such ) which is why it was deemed unseaworthy. It was towed successfully to several other countries without incident. Needless to say, Noah didn't have British codes to deal with it.
Indeed. Then we have the fact that the “laws” of probability and statistics are used to “predict” the motions of things including the most elementary “particles.” So the naive idea of “randomness” is almost aways wrong, as wrong as the naive idea of "destiny. " Everything seems to act within bounds. As for “mind” it is what acts on information. What it IS, is the question. . Eben Alexander’s little firestorm based on his experience. love him for raising so many protests from the cocksure,
Oh thanks. The most probable number of 'kinds' were just over 900, meaning about 2000 creatures, which was more than feasible. After all, if you were going to make it up, you'd make it up well. Oh and also your keyboard seems to be malfunctioning, its making you look juvenile.
In total, Noah, his family, and the animals spent a total of 378 days in the Ark: equivalent to 1 year and 18 days, not 120 years as stated by the reporter.
Noah spent approximately 120 years on building the ark, that's what she meant. This is just a maximum approximation based on the range between his age when his sons were born and the post-flood.
like how that bloke says "people dont make this stuff up", I forgot every story in existence was real. What i fail to understand is that an adult believing in someone like Santa is ludicrous, but believing in a bloke who we've never seen and can do all this 'amazing stuff'' isn't?... I have no qualms with people who find comfort in religion but i just don't understand it at all.
I look forward to when we can visit. I was an atheist, raised in a family of scientists, got my Bachelor of Science in science and test materials for a living with nuclear gauges. I once was an old age believing earthling, now I know the difference. God is the real deal. This Disneyland styled theme park looks fun for all, (including atheists, billion year and recent year scientists), it looks well done, and half the price of other theme parks (I hope they build a 'log jam' and 'hammerhead' ride). Anyway, the price-point seems reasonable, after all, even the skeptic benefits by seeing the 'supposed' scale of the Biblical claim. Keep the doors open, and eventually, like the animals (not saying anything) we will come!
This is not some crack-head, this is an archeaologist; someone who spends their life devoted to studying things like that. Also, archeaologists have to rule-out any opposing possibilities to dis-prove their findings before presenting their findings as what they believe it to be. So, obviously that is what he had to do. If he didn't follow the ethics of his career, wouldn't that cause problems? It has to be a gov-funded/educational source to publish archeaological findings? Strawman argument.
Before the Ark was built people had become evil. They had 120 years to repent and 120 years to build the Ark. but they mocked and laughed at Noah and God as many do here. All sin is a transgression of Gods law. 1 John 3.3-5 …3 And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure. 4. Everyone who practices sin practices lawlessness as well. Indeed, sin is lawlessness. 5. But you know that Christ appeared to take away sins, and in Him there is no sin.… Matthew 24:37-39 King James Version (KJV) 37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man, Jesus be. God is going to send Jesus to save this world from destruction. Are you ready or at least wise enough to read Gods word and see if it will benefit you?
Not one word was mentioned whether this boat floated or not. That boy said he thought the story was a fairy tale, then he grew up and now knows the real meaning... Ha! Grow up and realize it is STILL a fairy tale. Poorly written but widely believed by children of every age.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
let me get this right. Noah building a boat is a myth. Ape turning into a person not a myth. Hmmmmmmm i think we can all agree which is more of a fairy tale.
***** Francis Crick the co discoverer of DNA and code breaker actually believed in alien seeding to explain away the impossibility of the cell creating itself as to a state by which it could replicate. There is no natural process which creates large amounts of specified complex information, natural processes with no exception always reduce specified complex information over time. A natural origins of life scenario violates this known fact. The only reason why so many have opted to believe the un believable and hold onto a dead idea is because if you can't get a cell to form naturally there is only one other solution. That solution is design. Secular scientist operate under the ABCD logic, " Anything But Creationism / Design. " We have known forever that cells don't just make themselves, life only comes from life, it is a LAW for crying out loud. As I said the only reason people bet their life savings on an impossible idea is because of the logical consequence of accepting the truth. Just accept it, we were designed, big deal not like you did not know that already. Nobody with a working brain could possibly speculate that nature just blindly wrote its own code with repair enzymes, molecular machinery, so on and so forth. It simply is not possible to really believe that, even if you wanted to believe it you can't because you have a brain and your brain knows better.
***** Awe the good ol poor design argument. Remember the poorly designed eye argument ? That was recently shown to be incredibly false as well. How long before your car begins to rust ? Due to genetic entropy, humans have accumulated mutations over time. This same mechanism which allows for a mutation to be selected for is the same mechanism which passes on in far greater abundance neutral and harmful mutations. There is a huge miss conception that harmful genes are not passed on. This could not be further from the truth. Any mutation which prevents you from passing on your genes is not passed on, however harmful mutations which do not prevent passing on of genes can and are passed on. For instance a late life cancer, or even loosing eyes as cave dwelling animals or bats. Then there are the mutations which have no noticeable effect which are titled neutral mutations. Why is this important ? Simple because in order for darwinian evolution to be true, and not a myth / legend, the useful mutations must outnumber both near neutral and harmful mutations within those who pass their genes on. The problem is they are not even close. Useful mutations are extremely rare, and even when they happen, they are passed on ALONG SIDE other mutations which had no benefit or role to play on the passing of genes. What does this mean ? This means evolution is 100% true, if by evolution you mean change over time. The problem is that change is going in the reverse direction assumed by materialist. It would be like spending 100 bucks to get 1 buck back and calling that progress because you took your focus off the 100 and solely directed your attention to the 1 dollar return. Junk Dna was a prediction made by evolutionist based on this known fact. Evolutionist predicted that if the process was random, and long periods of time had passed, most of the genome should be evolutionary leftovers. Scientist assumed junk dna was true because up until very recently they had no clue what the rest of the genome did. So junk dna was taught as proof of evolution, boasting without shame of the predictive power of evolutionary thinking within biology. The Encode Project however discovered that over 85% of the human genome is functional. This defies evolutionary predictions. Mathematically this is impossible. One can't account for such large amounts of useful coding without appealing to intelligence. This evolutionary prediction fell flat on its face with the advancement of science. The boasting of junk dna as proof of evolution has been silenced by the reality of the prediction not matching reality. Evolution if you are subscribed to science feeds as I am is in a serious crisis. Nobody with a brain takes it serious. Now the origins of life, only a serious nut case honestly believes blindly that just happened. Nobody in their right mind who knows the problems and odds can look you in the face and tell you they believe it. I am just being as honest as I can with you. To deny these known facts is to be willfully ignorant, which is to be dogmatic. Truth should never be fought, it should be embraced at the expense of our prior belief structure. Mind you, for 24 Years of my life i too believed in evolution. I converted slowly, it did not happen over night. I have studied this topic for over 6 years now, I have read more articles than I would like to admit, I have seen admissions I never thought I would see from both sides. It is true, look it up for yourself, evolutionist are calling for a new theory because the current theory fails at explaining features of the organic world.
***** Hello Emfederin, you seem really upset for no reason. Can you please tell me when i miss treated you as to encourage such hostile behavior from you ? I am simply speaking the truth and sharing what I have learned, which was kept from me in the public school system. Everyone deserves to know the truth, what they do with that truth is up to them. I will continue to share the truth so that others can make a more informed decision. If this angers you than you need to re examine yourself in light of this observation.
***** Scientifically speaking i can only say we were designed. I can't say who. The arguments I have brought up are only useful for design. Just trust me you can't even form a single protein by chance let alone a self replicating cell by chance. The cell is far more advanced than any super computer we have ever built, our super computers get pooped on by the cell. Can't even compare the two, not even close to fair for our computers, they suck so much compared to a simple cell. Believing in an alien is more rational than believing lightning hit some mud and made an error correcting cell, that is absolute nonsense.
***** the reason being is that even if you have the right building materials, you can't get them to organize themselves in a meaningful manner. Imagine a box of billions of puzzle pieces. How long would it take you to form the image on the front cover by simply shaking the box ? The answer is it would never happen because the moment you got 5 pieces to fit together at random by chance, they would fall back apart by the continual shaking of the box in attempt to get the 6th piece to connect. The shaking both brings pieces together and breaks them back apart. Likewise in reality the same natural processes which bring amino acids together are the same natural processes which destroy and tare them apart. There is no way nature can build specified complex arrangements, nature always reduces specificity. I can give you an experiment to try at home to test this fact. Get 2 decks of cards, build a castle out of 1 outside. Now place a deck of cards next to it. Grab a lawn chair and observe the results. Nature will destroy your specified card arrangement and your solo deck of cards will have done nothing. You can also do it with any specified complex arrangement. Mount Rushmore is another example. Given time and erosion what will happen to the faces ? Will they magically resemble different presidents faces with high accuracy or will they loose their specificity due to natural processes ? Clearly mount rushmore will loose its specificity over time. You can observe this in every specified complex arrangement. Your engine is specified, over time it becomes less and less specified until it breaks. To believe a cell made itself you have to believe that when nobody was looking nature did what nature is not capable of doing in the present, which is produce large amounts of specified complex information. This is absolutely silly. We know something is designed if it is both, specified and complex. The cell is both specified and complex. Mount rushmore is both specified and complex. You can instantly recognize design when you see both criteria met. Since you are into aliens, Cern uses this same method for knowing if a signal is random or intelligent. They look for a specified complex sequence because nature is not capable of producing specified complex sequences. Nature can only create patterns. If we use the same method Cern uses to search for life and turn those big ol telescopes back in at ourselves, we discover that our dna matches the requirement for intelligent design. YEAY !
its his money not yours dont complain about what he does its not a waste to be happy and do what you want to do. although i agree it could have helped people you also have to be happy...
God did not punish mankind with the flood because of sin. He did it because our DNA had been manipulated to create something ungodly. ‘Noah was perfect in his generations’. His DNA was unblemished. That’s why he was chosen to survive. The days of Noah are back. You’ll see.
I love how when someone runs out of intelligent things to say, that they resort to swearing and get all defensive or go into attack mode... funny! Thanks for making my night. :)
Ron Wyatt "banned proof the Bible is real" on youtube has found each and every archeological find. There are 8 videos and if you choose to watch I feel you will have no doubt that YHWH is the One True God and Yeshua (Jesus) was the Messiah. Dr. Kent Hovind " creation series" also has some very good evidence and stated that most of the water the Bible say's came from under the crust of the earth when the fountains of the deep broke open.
'The story of Noah and his ark...' It's not really a story, is it? Is it? It's just a fairy tail, or something to that effect. If it's a story, it's a bullshit story.
At the end of the last ice age, there were inundations world wide, including the Mediterranean Basin, England was once connected to Europe, for imstances.
She gets several things wrong, God did not regret destroying evil people in the flood, the rain now is the promise of grace to allow people to live, even if they turn from Him, as most of the world is doing now, but will destroy all with fire next time; repent and believe, Jesus Christ, crucified and risen!
Would somebody point to the spot in this video where we actually see the ark sailing?
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
i am intrigued, what backing is that?
What's that song in the back ground with the instrumentals
how many cubic meters of wood are needed for a project like this? what wood was used?
+Rosana Di Carlo way to much,. many innocent trees have been wasted creation this pile of crap.
+Rosana Di Carlo inderdaad, erg duidelijk, ik wens je hetzelfde, en veel plezier met je denkbeeldige vriendje
You do know the ark was around 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high(300 cubits, 50 cubits, 30 cubits). They were in the ark for a year, which most measurements is around 365 days. Just for one pair of horse it is several tons to feed them for a year. Hopefully the food doesn't spoil and they brought enough to sustained the animal for the time after they departed. What kind of formula did you use to get that number from?
No, the Ark used the Egyptian cubit, which was around 20.64 inches, so the Ark would have been much bigger, it was around 516 feet long, 86 feet wide and 51.6 feet high
RUclips :
Low Tech Bible Discovries
RUclips: Ron Wyatt
If your not not Afraid
Take the challenge
Note: they were not anchors the are roll Stones , they did not hang them from the bottom of the ark , they are like are Modern day Paravaine.
@@56username ron wyatt was a con artist. he did not find the ark.
Bloody Brilliant. Its surreal to see something like this in 2013
Do they still open in 2022?
Adres alstublieft, kunt u bezoeken?
I also didn't see this ark sailing as the vid title claims.
The ark was about to leave for Brazil ( on the back of a barge for health and safety reasons, although I think it would sink) but someone ran into the side of it and made a hole.
@@Macthella convently someone made a hole that day
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
Don’t forget genesis 7:2 he sent 7 pairs of every clean animal 🦒 besides the 2 pairs of every unclean animal 🦓 to the ark
Supposedly. Don't say it like he did! There's no evidence.
A 600-foot high tsunami would surely leave behind a geological calling card -- and that it did. When waves are generated by such a significant impact, they create wedge-shaped configurations in the sand, known as chevrons, and when the Holocene Impact Working Group went looking for them with satellite imagery, they were able to locate such formations in Africa and Asia.
National Geographic Society explorer Robert Ballard, inspired by Ryan and Pitman's hypothesis, has discovered supporting physical evidence, including an underwater river valley and ancient shoreline as well as Stone Age structures and tools beneath the Black Sea. His team has also unearthed fossils of now-extinct freshwater species dating back some 7,460 to 15,500 years
When one looks into history one can see so many global flood stories from so many different cultures its amazing. It's also amazing people that call themselves intelligent disrespectful to other people who all have valid opinion shame shame shame.
What does my age have to do with anything?
It was in the port of our Village and it crushed 2 boats lol
3:47. False statement! God regretted making mankind because of their sin and wickedness. Read Genesis.
Everything she said was a complete ignorant lie!
Genesis is a myth and not worth the read
It goes deeper than that... read Genesis 6.
@@mauriceguymoi The book of Genesis is real. People who say that it's not real only because they don't truly understand it. I'm actually making a documentary film on Noah's Ark; and for 2 years I've made more discoveries and accurate theories then most professional biblical experts would. When I read the book of Genesis I picture whatever it says in my mind in order to understand it more clearly. Doing this trick might help you better understand the book of Genesis.
God always does what is right. Though something can be unfortunate that it has to occur, God would have never done this extreme punishment, if it was not necessary to do. Note that though the wicked are many, even as it was in Sodom and Gomorrah, going with the popular crowd is not always wise, if the majority is doing unrighteousness. God will not be unjust by punishing the righteous with the unrighteous. A righteous judge must pronounce judgment against evildoers. It does not make the judge evil, but the judge is necessary to keep righteousness preserved in the earth, and a good and righteous judge is honest and true.
wow..lots of hate and anger on these comments...
It is appalling to think that people would waste over $100 Million for a myth instead of building god knows how many hospitals for the needy or sending Dr.s to help the poor and ill of the world; it's almost criminal and shame on these idiots. How many times must it be shown that the ark is a myth. It was demonstrated in 1777 by Eberhart Zimmerman (google it). That was 243 years ago and yet today ignoramuses still purport this insanity. It's simple; A ship stranded on a high mountain where there is no vegetation (High altitude) or killed vegetation (Mud, salt water, little vegetation to start with), will not sustain a troupe of Herbivores. Let them loose on this island on a mountain and they will die of starvation, but before they do, the predators will eat them all in a swift swoop. If they eat but one of a couple (male or female) it's doom for that species. Finally, what ever the scenario, it ends up in a mass extinction. And, that is why the whole thing is a myth, which by the way the Pope admitted to in the late 18th century. Pass the word along once and for all.
Click bait.
Beautiful.
It is appalling to think that people would waste over $100 Million for a myth instead of building god knows how many hospitals for the needy or sending Dr.s to help the poor and ill of the world; it's almost criminal and shame on these idiots. How many times must it be shown that the ark is a myth. It was demonstrated in 1777 by Eberhart Zimmerman (google it). That was 243 years ago and yet today ignoramuses still purport this insanity. It's simple; A ship stranded on a high mountain where there is no vegetation (High altitude) or killed vegetation (Mud, salt water, little vegetation to start with), will not sustain a troupe of Herbivores. Let them loose on this island on a mountain and they will die of starvation, but before they do, the predators will eat them all in a swift swoop. If they eat but one of a couple (male or female) it's doom for that species. Finally, what ever the scenario, it ends up in a mass extinction. And, that is why the whole thing is a myth, which by the way the Pope admitted to in the late 18th century. Pass the word along once and for all.
He isn't going to flood it this next time. Its all going to burn. Hes going to destroy it with fire next time.
I do like that he doesn't say anything like "This is a mission from god." He kinda treats it like... well, a hobby. I can't dislike this if it's done for fun or to make a profit from tourists.
Until they pack 2 of every animal on earth on board it's not a replica, is it?
It was a lot easier than you think from the wolf look how many kinds of dogs came All those K9 from 1
There are many animals/insects etc. that exist in continents unknown in the Bronze Age. Genesis does not mention Kangaroos or Polar Bears.
Geological events that alter sea level will be more to do with changing the shape of the ocean bed. For example an earthquake which raises the ocean floor by 2 feet will raise the sea by the same amount. Obviously this would only occur if all the Worlds ocean floors were raised but the raising of one area of sea floor will raise the average sea level, if only by a tiny amount. Over long periods of time this could add up to a significant alteration is sea level. Sounds like flooding aftermath.
2:04 : Wrong, never is it said in the Bible how long it took Noah to build the Ark. 120 years is an interpretation of Genesis 6: 3
Everything that woman said was a lie. She doesn't even know what the biblical account says.
Geez, I thought the Dutch were a lot smarter than this? OK now sail it across the Atlantic, or tow it across, bet it won't make it.
unpleasant comments? O NOES!!!
Lol! Well God bless and Merry Christmas to you too!
Nice inspiration .
That would survive 300ft waves for sure... Easily would sail through twice the size of this planets highest ocean waves during storms. Would sail without a bumpy ride.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
Karen Armstrong. Give us a break. How about a real Bible scholar who is a Christian?
Noah's Ark 500 ft long Johann Huibers Ark 390 ft long. Not seaworthy.
and yet its been to germany,norway, and denmark...
@@redsampler2017 Send it to the north atlantic during a winter storm. We'll see if Dog can keep it afloat.
The Ark itself was seaworthy, but not enough to waves bigger than it, so it had drogue stones to keep it stable and not sink it. The real Ark wasn't 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet tall as many say, the Ark used a cubit that measured 20.64 inches, so it's real size would be 516 feet long, 86 feet wide and 51.6 feet tall.
As the ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
It's not just "some guy", these are well respected oceanographers and archeaologists, not some crack-heads. I always thought that water evaoporated, call me crazy. If water evaporates, isn't there a chance that there once was water in the pyramids? You have obviously never heard of the water-erosion affect in Egypt, and although it is not specifically aimed at the pyramids, I think that it applies here. Go to wikipedia and type in Sphinx water erosion hypothesis.
Noah's drunk is straight from Genesis. Try reading the Bible sometime.
Ok but the odds of 75 feet of rain a day to cover the highest points on earth is just not possible
Everything is possible to GOD....
Darwin’s theory is natural selection. He didn’t “invent” the theory of evolution. Heck, his grandfather Erasmus was a proponent of evolution vs. the cataclysmic theory, of which a universal flood was considered a major cause.
The clean animals walked in by 7"S the unclean animals walked in by 2"s
the number doesn't matter, it never happened. It is appalling to think that people would waste over $100 Million for a myth instead of building god knows how many hospitals for the needy or sending Dr.s to help the poor and ill of the world; it's almost criminal and shame on these idiots. How many times must it be shown that the ark is a myth. It was demonstrated in 1777 by Eberhart Zimmerman (google it). That was 243 years ago and yet today ignoramuses still purport this insanity. It's simple; A ship stranded on a high mountain where there is no vegetation (High altitude) or killed vegetation (Mud, salt water, little vegetation to start with), will not sustain a troupe of Herbivores. Let them loose on this island on a mountain and they will die of starvation, but before they do, the predators will eat them all in a swift swoop. If they eat but one of a couple (male or female) it's doom for that species. Finally, what ever the scenario, it ends up in a mass extinction. And, that is why the whole thing is a myth, which by the way the Pope admitted to in the late 18th century. Pass the word along once and for all.
Yes Hannah, you are correct.
Tide goes in, tide goes out. Never.... Sea levels went down because ice formed on the land and didn't run off.And ice did not cover the whole Earth.
There are around 225 global flood stories, I didn't favor one myth over another in that calculation. Though that formula was in response to the claim of the population double every 150 years. However, the food supply for herbivores would be non-existent and and carnivores' would become existent within a year. Just using your data and the lower limit of the estimate population(7 million) during 4000 B.C.E. there is a 874999% increase of the population over a 400 year span.
That is not Bible no windows except one in the top an one door an God sealed them and you better read your Bible again get the facts straights 1 windows one door you didn't see through the eyes of Noah God told him how to build the ark in side may be OK, but outside is not Wright miss in one point you must miss all the other God doesn't make mistake God is always right no mistake Wright all the time that's why He is God
And that Ark is a sure floater and you know it
Woah there tiger! Just don't ever pick a fight with me in the future...lol!
Look at this new reef for belgium. What a nice guy.
Is it a replica if the Ark never existed in the first place?
It’s a fake copy meant to give credibility
Noah's Ark did exist, non-believers, it's on one of the mountains of Ararat, almost gone by now, it is on a place called Durupinar site, the Ark looked like 2 rectangular boxes, the higher the smaller, in a canoe/boat hull, it was made out of gopher wood, covered inside and outside with pitch for waterproofing, it had drogue stones hanging on it's back to keep it stable on extremely tough seas; it's size was 300 cubits long (516 feet), 50 cubits wide (86 feet) and 30 cubits tall (51.6 feet), it used a cubit that measured 20.64 inches. You would probably say the Durupinar site has a natural formation, but it has too much evidence of being Noah's Ark, so it's NOT a natural formation.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 It never existed
@@GamePlayerZ1912 that is a hoax btw
@@xxxod shut up, you're just an angry non-believer of the word of the mighty Lord
That's interesting, where in the Bible does it say that?
Genesis chapters 6-9.
so why comment when you cant back it up...whatever...dont believe everything you see or read...question it. Merry xmas
(Just for fun)....
When the information of a DNA molecule (DNA coding) is copied, the source of the info in that copy always goes back to the mind from which it was created. The laws of information say that information has to come from somewhere/something, it can not be spontanenous or come from natural selection. =)
I have to wonder why you're even on here to begin with. I mean, if you don't believe in this stuff, why are you watching this? There's no point. Going back to one of my earlier posts, an oceanographer is one who studies WATER, just saying. If he is an oceanographer, shouldn't he know what the hell he's talking about? The thing that amazes me about you non-believers, is even if someone has provided you with evidence like I have, you still don't believe and most likely never will. Why watch it?
...according to the Bible, God sent two each of the "unclean" beasts, but the "clean" animals He sent in groups of sevens (Ge 7:2). The catholics teach their own perversion of this wonderful story of redemption and this is why it is so important to go directly to the Word of God...
I hope one day children in history class will ask their teacher "what was religion?"
At 5:05 did this guy say people don’t make “these” things up? REALLY?!? People haven’t been making up stories since person a could communicate with person b? When you are 100% bent on being wrong, you sure can find ways to make it happen. Dumb story for gullible people.
@5:00 Of course people don't make these things up. Harry Potter really did save the world from Voldemort!
Or they have the comments disabled because of unpleasant comments with vulgar language.
What about the ice age? Frozen water covering the planet. How did water cover the WHOLE planet. If it is improbable to have a flood covering the whole planet, wouldn't that by extention make the ice age improbable? Because, whether it's the flood or the ice age, it's still water covering the whole planet.....
Apparently the ice age is going at the ark museum as well.
I havent made any claims and havent preached any message. I havent anything to back up. but whatever merry christmas
A replica suggests there was once an original. Two animals of each sounds very incestuous to me. Very cool boat though
That is a fallacy propagated by far too many people. Many animals came in by 7's.... only some came in by 2's.
Yes there was, it is on Durupinar site, one of the mountains of the Ararat region, it is a mountainous valley and the Ark is in it, almost gone by now and fossilized, it has a lot of evidence that proves it's the real one, it's size is 516 feet long, 86 feet wide and 51.6 feet tall, it looked like two rectangular boxes on a canoe/boat hull, the higher the smaller, it also had drogue stones hung on it's back for keeping it stable on very tough seas.
Noah's family - the only survivors - were therefore also Incestuos.
Where did all the water go?
It is a structure built upon barges.
Floating is not sailing.
Not two of every animal. Two of every "unclean" animal and fourteen of every "clean" animal.
Genesis 7:2-3
"Of every clean beast you shall take with you seven by seven, the sire and his dam, and of the beast that is not clean, of them pairs, the sire and his dam.
Also, of the clean flyer of the heavens seven by seven, male and female, and of the flyer that is not clean, of them pairs, male and female, to keep seed alive on the surface of the entire earth."
Adam did not know his Bible not very well. Nine year later, he may.
3:03 I do not ask why. Why implies intent. Weather has no intent.
3:14 I just get over it as quickly as possible. No need for fairly tales and nonsensical stories to sooth my feels.
There is no meaning to be found in the Bible. It is a collection of 66 books written by, for and about men.
3:44 Oh no. You are so wrong. God destroyed everything on the face of the Earth because Yahweh regretted creating humans. He did not regret destroying them and everything else with them.
genesis 6:7
"Yahweh regretted that He had made humanity on earth, and He grieved in His heart."
1 Samuel 15:10-11
"The word of Yahweh came to Samuel, saying,
I regret that I caused Saul to reign as king, for he has turned away from following Me and has not carried out My words. Now Samuel grew angry, and he cried out to Yahweh all that night."
1 Samuel 15:35
"Samuel did not come again to see Saul until the day of his death, though Samuel mourned for Saul, because Yahweh regretted that He had made Saul king over Israel."
There are flood stories all over because localized floods have and still happen almost everywhere.
Demonstrate the existence of Yahweh.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
I never said that Darwin invented Evolution, I don't know where that came from.....
I would LOVE to see Noah's ark actually sailing for months MAYBE YEARS
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
@@richardwebb2348 So much for the Bible..
@@richardwebb2348 Very disingenuous. I checked this out and I invite others to as well. It lacked necessary certificates ( anti-fouling and such ) which is why it was deemed unseaworthy. It was towed successfully to several other countries without incident. Needless to say, Noah didn't have British codes to deal with it.
Genesis 7:2 You shall take with you 7 each of every CLEAN animal a male & female 2 each of UNCLEAN animals.....
Um...there was no Noah
Indeed. Then we have the fact that the “laws” of probability and statistics are used to “predict” the motions of things including the most elementary “particles.” So the naive idea of “randomness” is almost aways wrong, as wrong as the naive idea of "destiny. " Everything seems to act within bounds. As for “mind” it is what acts on information. What it IS, is the question. . Eben Alexander’s little firestorm based on his experience. love him for raising so many protests from the cocksure,
Oh thanks. The most probable number of 'kinds' were just over 900, meaning about 2000 creatures, which was more than feasible. After all, if you were going to make it up, you'd make it up well. Oh and also your keyboard seems to be malfunctioning, its making you look juvenile.
In total, Noah, his family, and the animals spent a total of 378 days in the Ark: equivalent to 1 year and 18 days, not 120 years as stated by the reporter.
Also, the ark only floated for 6 months. Good point.
Noah spent approximately 120 years on building the ark, that's what she meant. This is just a maximum approximation based on the range between his age when his sons were born and the post-flood.
120 years to build
The only thing God regrets is NOT just flooding the earth. He started off by saying HE REGRET MAKING HUMANITY
Show me where in the Bible it says that Yahweh regretted flooding Earth.
like how that bloke says "people dont make this stuff up", I forgot every story in existence was real. What i fail to understand is that an adult believing in someone like Santa is ludicrous, but believing in a bloke who we've never seen and can do all this 'amazing stuff'' isn't?... I have no qualms with people who find comfort in religion but i just don't understand it at all.
It is not in religion your foolishness, it is in God
Religion does not save anyone, it is God who saves
#amen
The Fishes and the Ducks took up too much space... so the Dinosaurs had to stay out!!
God is coming back. Hope everyone is ready ❤
I look forward to when we can visit. I was an atheist, raised in a family of scientists, got my Bachelor of Science in science and test materials for a living with nuclear gauges. I once was an old age believing earthling, now I know the difference. God is the real deal. This Disneyland styled theme park looks fun for all, (including atheists, billion year and recent year scientists), it looks well done, and half the price of other theme parks (I hope they build a 'log jam' and 'hammerhead' ride). Anyway, the price-point seems reasonable, after all, even the skeptic benefits by seeing the 'supposed' scale of the Biblical claim. Keep the doors open, and eventually, like the animals (not saying anything) we will come!
Glad you found the truth.
I am the opposite. I had a heavy religious background but I woke up.
This is not some crack-head, this is an archeaologist; someone who spends their life devoted to studying things like that. Also, archeaologists have to rule-out any opposing possibilities to dis-prove their findings before presenting their findings as what they believe it to be. So, obviously that is what he had to do. If he didn't follow the ethics of his career, wouldn't that cause problems? It has to be a gov-funded/educational source to publish archeaological findings? Strawman argument.
Before the Ark was built people had become evil. They had 120 years to repent and 120 years to build the Ark. but they mocked and laughed at Noah and God as many do here.
All sin is a transgression of Gods law. 1 John 3.3-5 …3 And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure. 4. Everyone who practices sin practices lawlessness as well. Indeed, sin is lawlessness. 5. But you know that Christ appeared to take away sins, and in Him there is no sin.…
Matthew 24:37-39 King James Version (KJV) 37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man, Jesus be.
God is going to send Jesus to save this world from destruction. Are you ready or at least wise enough to read Gods word and see if it will benefit you?
I prefer Lucy. His crib seems way more action-packed. Plus he doesn't punish you for having fun.
People NEED to believe this kinda....stuff. Whether it's true or not is irrelevant.
Not one word was mentioned whether this boat floated or not.
That boy said he thought the story was a fairy tale, then he grew up and now knows the real meaning... Ha! Grow up and realize it is STILL a fairy tale. Poorly written but widely believed by children of every age.
The ark has no sails or other means of propulsion - it is a barge requiring to be towed! Displayed recently in Britain, it proved to be so un-seaworthy it has been impounded and the owner fined:allthatsinteresting.com/noahs-ark-stranded
You must have believed in this?? You should have believed in this
WOLVES WRAPPED IN SHEEPS CLOTHING
let me get this right. Noah building a boat is a myth. Ape turning into a person not a myth.
Hmmmmmmm i think we can all agree which is more of a fairy tale.
***** Francis Crick the co discoverer of DNA and code breaker actually believed in alien seeding to explain away the impossibility of the cell creating itself as to a state by which it could replicate. There is no natural process which creates large amounts of specified complex information, natural processes with no exception always reduce specified complex information over time. A natural origins of life scenario violates this known fact.
The only reason why so many have opted to believe the un believable and hold onto a dead idea is because if you can't get a cell to form naturally there is only one other solution. That solution is design. Secular scientist operate under the ABCD logic, " Anything But Creationism / Design. "
We have known forever that cells don't just make themselves, life only comes from life, it is a LAW for crying out loud. As I said the only reason people bet their life savings on an impossible idea is because of the logical consequence of accepting the truth.
Just accept it, we were designed, big deal not like you did not know that already. Nobody with a working brain could possibly speculate that nature just blindly wrote its own code with repair enzymes, molecular machinery, so on and so forth. It simply is not possible to really believe that, even if you wanted to believe it you can't because you have a brain and your brain knows better.
***** Awe the good ol poor design argument. Remember the poorly designed eye argument ? That was recently shown to be incredibly false as well.
How long before your car begins to rust ? Due to genetic entropy, humans have accumulated mutations over time. This same mechanism which allows for a mutation to be selected for is the same mechanism which passes on in far greater abundance neutral and harmful mutations.
There is a huge miss conception that harmful genes are not passed on. This could not be further from the truth. Any mutation which prevents you from passing on your genes is not passed on, however harmful mutations which do not prevent passing on of genes can and are passed on. For instance a late life cancer, or even loosing eyes as cave dwelling animals or bats. Then there are the mutations which have no noticeable effect which are titled neutral mutations.
Why is this important ? Simple because in order for darwinian evolution to be true, and not a myth / legend, the useful mutations must outnumber both near neutral and harmful mutations within those who pass their genes on. The problem is they are not even close. Useful mutations are extremely rare, and even when they happen, they are passed on ALONG SIDE other mutations which had no benefit or role to play on the passing of genes.
What does this mean ? This means evolution is 100% true, if by evolution you mean change over time. The problem is that change is going in the reverse direction assumed by materialist. It would be like spending 100 bucks to get 1 buck back and calling that progress because you took your focus off the 100 and solely directed your attention to the 1 dollar return.
Junk Dna was a prediction made by evolutionist based on this known fact. Evolutionist predicted that if the process was random, and long periods of time had passed, most of the genome should be evolutionary leftovers. Scientist assumed junk dna was true because up until very recently they had no clue what the rest of the genome did. So junk dna was taught as proof of evolution, boasting without shame of the predictive power of evolutionary thinking within biology.
The Encode Project however discovered that over 85% of the human genome is functional. This defies evolutionary predictions. Mathematically this is impossible. One can't account for such large amounts of useful coding without appealing to intelligence. This evolutionary prediction fell flat on its face with the advancement of science. The boasting of junk dna as proof of evolution has been silenced by the reality of the prediction not matching reality.
Evolution if you are subscribed to science feeds as I am is in a serious crisis. Nobody with a brain takes it serious.
Now the origins of life, only a serious nut case honestly believes blindly that just happened. Nobody in their right mind who knows the problems and odds can look you in the face and tell you they believe it. I am just being as honest as I can with you. To deny these known facts is to be willfully ignorant, which is to be dogmatic. Truth should never be fought, it should be embraced at the expense of our prior belief structure.
Mind you, for 24 Years of my life i too believed in evolution. I converted slowly, it did not happen over night. I have studied this topic for over 6 years now, I have read more articles than I would like to admit, I have seen admissions I never thought I would see from both sides. It is true, look it up for yourself, evolutionist are calling for a new theory because the current theory fails at explaining features of the organic world.
***** Hello Emfederin, you seem really upset for no reason. Can you please tell me when i miss treated you as to encourage such hostile behavior from you ?
I am simply speaking the truth and sharing what I have learned, which was kept from me in the public school system. Everyone deserves to know the truth, what they do with that truth is up to them.
I will continue to share the truth so that others can make a more informed decision. If this angers you than you need to re examine yourself in light of this observation.
***** Scientifically speaking i can only say we were designed. I can't say who. The arguments I have brought up are only useful for design. Just trust me you can't even form a single protein by chance let alone a self replicating cell by chance.
The cell is far more advanced than any super computer we have ever built, our super computers get pooped on by the cell. Can't even compare the two, not even close to fair for our computers, they suck so much compared to a simple cell.
Believing in an alien is more rational than believing lightning hit some mud and made an error correcting cell, that is absolute nonsense.
***** the reason being is that even if you have the right building materials, you can't get them to organize themselves in a meaningful manner.
Imagine a box of billions of puzzle pieces. How long would it take you to form the image on the front cover by simply shaking the box ? The answer is it would never happen because the moment you got 5 pieces to fit together at random by chance, they would fall back apart by the continual shaking of the box in attempt to get the 6th piece to connect. The shaking both brings pieces together and breaks them back apart.
Likewise in reality the same natural processes which bring amino acids together are the same natural processes which destroy and tare them apart. There is no way nature can build specified complex arrangements, nature always reduces specificity.
I can give you an experiment to try at home to test this fact. Get 2 decks of cards, build a castle out of 1 outside. Now place a deck of cards next to it. Grab a lawn chair and observe the results. Nature will destroy your specified card arrangement and your solo deck of cards will have done nothing.
You can also do it with any specified complex arrangement. Mount Rushmore is another example. Given time and erosion what will happen to the faces ? Will they magically resemble different presidents faces with high accuracy or will they loose their specificity due to natural processes ? Clearly mount rushmore will loose its specificity over time.
You can observe this in every specified complex arrangement. Your engine is specified, over time it becomes less and less specified until it breaks.
To believe a cell made itself you have to believe that when nobody was looking nature did what nature is not capable of doing in the present, which is produce large amounts of specified complex information. This is absolutely silly.
We know something is designed if it is both, specified and complex. The cell is both specified and complex. Mount rushmore is both specified and complex. You can instantly recognize design when you see both criteria met.
Since you are into aliens, Cern uses this same method for knowing if a signal is random or intelligent. They look for a specified complex sequence because nature is not capable of producing specified complex sequences. Nature can only create patterns.
If we use the same method Cern uses to search for life and turn those big ol telescopes back in at ourselves, we discover that our dna matches the requirement for intelligent design. YEAY !
lol thats like across my home :p
its his money not yours dont complain about what he does its not a waste to be happy and do what you want to do. although i agree it could have helped people you also have to be happy...
this is a nice homage to the beliefs of our forefathers and a nice way to make a buck.
Just look at the Grand Canyon and you know it is true!
Amazing Ark god would be proud of you
God did not punish mankind with the flood because of sin. He did it because our DNA had been manipulated to create something ungodly. ‘Noah was perfect in his generations’. His DNA was unblemished. That’s why he was chosen to survive. The days of Noah are back. You’ll see.
Noah was the head of an incestuous family following the genocide - think of all the millions of abortions perpetrated by your Bronze Age god!
That's real cute
I love how when someone runs out of intelligent things to say, that they resort to swearing and get all defensive or go into attack mode... funny! Thanks for making my night. :)
Exactly.....
Did anybody else notice what looked like a sore on that teenage boys lip? Smh...lol!
Ron Wyatt "banned proof the Bible is real" on youtube has found each and every archeological find. There are 8 videos and if you choose to watch I feel you will have no doubt that YHWH is the One True God and Yeshua (Jesus) was the Messiah. Dr. Kent Hovind " creation series" also has some very good evidence and stated that most of the water the Bible say's came from under the crust of the earth when the fountains of the deep broke open.
The ark is a one of the many symbols of GOD`S MERCY AND LOVE TO MANKIND EVEN THOUGH WE DONT DESERVE IT WE DESERVE DEATH GOD BLESS AMERICA!
'The story of Noah and his ark...'
It's not really a story, is it? Is it? It's just a fairy tail, or something to that effect. If it's a story, it's a bullshit story.
could not say better ...
There was no world wide flood as claimed by the bible. Time to put away childish things and acknowledge reality Robby.
At the end of the last ice age, there were inundations world wide, including the Mediterranean Basin, England was once connected to Europe, for imstances.
Visit Netherlands to see monument to human stupidity.
She gets several things wrong, God did not regret destroying evil people in the flood, the rain now is the promise of grace to allow people to live, even if they turn from Him, as most of the world is doing now, but will destroy all with fire next time; repent and believe, Jesus Christ, crucified and risen!
Too me. I have dream to build real Noah's Ark.
How very Christian of them. Instead of spending 100 mil on food for the hungry, they built a non sea worthy boat!!!
They can charge 5.00 to see and give it to the poor and hospitals.
Yeah, that's what happened,
Lol! Nice profile pic!