A Mike Trout Story You've NEVER Heard Before

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 дек 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @franc587
    @franc587 2 года назад +4

    Hello there Coach
    I'm trying to teach this tactic to my son who is 15
    God willing it does something good for him as a hitter

  • @danielpamaral2837
    @danielpamaral2837 7 месяцев назад

    That's magic that you can do that. I'm 48 and have been feeling it in my hips along with sciatica nerve coming from my hips from swinging the bat.Feeling it in the shoulder to lol

  • @activemusickid
    @activemusickid Год назад +1

    Maybe some hitters get in slumps because they face 1 or a series of great pitchers who just totally mess with their timing ??

  • @YHVHNUTRITION
    @YHVHNUTRITION 2 года назад +2

    A swing has to be repeatable, building consistency. Your swing is that and limits the necessity of perfect timing with the 80% load.

  • @khamaalirowan4814
    @khamaalirowan4814 Год назад

    Can you put out some slow motion videos?

  • @Emmanuel-dd6sw
    @Emmanuel-dd6sw 3 года назад

    Yes please let me no to lol. So over tightness in the upper body got it

  • @theswingmechanic
    @theswingmechanic 3 года назад +5

    You’re still searching because you haven’t found the key. It’s not working consistently because it’s not what separates the greats.

    • @djs2920
      @djs2920 3 года назад +4

      There’s no question in my mind that Teacherman is right about the mechanics of most of the great hitters…I’ve tried it…it works…if in doubt look at Jeff Bagwell…hall of fame with an unconventional setup and swing but did everything teacherman is explaining…the real challenge is the game itself hitting a moving ball that changes speed and direction..I feel that requires more than just great mechanics

    • @theswingmechanic
      @theswingmechanic 3 года назад +1

      ​@@djs2920 That's funny you said Jeff Bagwell. I've been thinking lately that if you took Schenck's method to it's extreme, you get a jeff bagwell. As I looked again at Bagwell's swing I see that it's only partially true.
      If you find the very best pound for pound hitters, you actually DO start to see patterns. The problem with so many of today's gurus, Schenck included, is they bought into the popular swing mechanics of the steroid era (Ever notice almost all his models are steroid users?). But those guys aren't among the top pound for pound hitters of all time. By making the P4P distinction, you change the entire course of action you take in understanding the swing. Schenck's model is not built on a solid foundation because it's based on the wrong guys.
      If this worked for you I think that's great. I can see how it would help some guys.

    • @patricktehan3590
      @patricktehan3590 3 года назад +1

      @@theswingmechanic I think steroids sped up his time to contact which allowed him more time to lay off balls but I think Bond's mechanics were there in Pittsburgh before the roids.

    • @theswingmechanic
      @theswingmechanic 3 года назад

      @@patricktehan3590 i agree with both things. His mechanics never changed, and yet he doubled his home run production. What does that tell you.

    • @patricktehan3590
      @patricktehan3590 3 года назад

      @@theswingmechanic 2 MVPs and a .883 OPS in Pittsburgh