I personally would put Indworlds into C tier. The Industrial revolution is known for being particularly rough on workers - so if you are not of high statue... you might be working dangerous jobs a lot. Apart from that you need to hope that the big-shots don't figure out how great war is, now tha they can mass produce weapons, bombs and tanks.
Nice recap of the different planet types! Though, one thing I'm pretty sure you forgot to think about is whether you're being drop podded or born in the planet. Because, if you've never seen a tree, why would urbworlds be unnatural?
I don't think they would be unnatural, but if you are born on one, you'll just never know what a tree looks like, perhaps only from stories, movies or textbooks.
@@thenightarchives4148 (TLDR at bottom) I think I made my point poorly, what I mean is that one super philosophical question: If you've never known about a life better than yours, can you really think about one? I think the people born there, living their entire mental and physical life there, wouldn't know of many lives better than their own, and so would be happy with readjusting what they have every so often. As they say, change is as good as a vacation, angling your bed 180* is a MASSIVE dopamine boost. The fact is. To them, it's not perfect, there would still be an upper and lower class. But, you'd think of your life as a B+, so why rate it lower? We have better lives here than on urbworlds. We have ecosystems, for one. We have movies about lives better than ours, famous people with more money than we can count. We can think about much better lives than they can. Realistically, it wouldn't be the best life, but it'd be one of the best you know of. Which one matters more? TLDR: I personally think it'd be a pretty good life, because you don't know better. Sorry about the text brick, I'm just really enthusiastic about this chunk of philosophy.
"You're definitely not gonna be lonely here" As experience shows, the more overcrowded a living place is the more isolated people become from each other which you can quite easily see by the state of midern big cities like Tokyo and such. It gets especially bad in an intense capitalistic environment. So, no, living in an urbworld would be hella depressing.
But I doubt they will drop pod industrial or glitter medicine in middle of nowhere. At least on rimworld there *are* people and orbital traders visit for generating profit of underdeveloped communities. Or maybe some people might fight with space pirates or something.
Glitterworlds always gave me "Logan's Run" vibes with a little bit of "The Giver". Maybe I'm just jaded, but I don't see that type of civilization happening without something _very_ sinister going on behind the scenes.
Hey! I establish colony on oceanic planet countless time at Persean Sector. The place habitable, people eat good with aquaponic (Goddamn Sindria have monopoly of Volturnian Lobster), plenty of organics (earthen call that black gold) for light industry and space suit, and I put that in either C (at least for the first settler) or A (if you the native born there) and everyone there can swim.
You know if a medival world slowly collided with a Steamworld (like how the moon was formed) you'd literally have an elder scrolls planet imagine steam robots surviving the impact and just chilling with the knights Alternatively they can become just like the ancient steam robots from Skyrim kinda funny really
In that case everyone on both planets would probably die from the force, shockwave, and heat of two planets slamming into one another but its kind of a cool concept
I mostly agree but I'd put oceanworlds in D tier rather than F. It would be like subnautica in rimworld. You would need adapted technology and housing but I'm sure people would manage and if they've got the technology then it might not even be that bad. If it's an uninhabited oceanworld though, you wouldn't survive.
But according to the wiki, the Deathworlds and Deadworlds are different. Deathworld: everything wants to kill you. Deadworld: This planet hasn't been checked yet because it's probably worthless but we'll never know until we see it. But yeah, generally uninhabitable.
From 5:49 to 6:10 it makes me feel... GOOD 😇 because the fact that I also have food, a house, and access to RUclips, despite what is said in the timestamp... I am happy 😄 that I am alive and well. Thank you night archives!
I have a Headcannon for a world Called:Shambler-worlds, as you can expect, its inhabited by Shamblers only and small groups of humans and very fortified strongholds. In your Opinion which would Shamdbler-Worlds hold? (very Likely in either D-F Tier)
considering anomaly loves the idea of sending you 5 billion different threats in the span of a year I'd be surprised if there aren't worlds completely overrun by shamblers or flesh beasts or anything anomaly throws.
Honestly I want to go from a glitter world to a rimworld. I am an anarchist so… the glitter is comfortable but nah fam I am just gonna jack a spaceship and make my drug empire. Also based farm pick. If we have say something like 2075 level of tech from less war being a farmer is going to be pretty cool. A nice farm is easy to operate right now after a few years in job training you will get for existing.
The wealthy explorer scenario is litarelly what you want btw.Some glitterworld citizen leaving for exploratipon and adventure and they start with plenty of supplies too so even tho they wouldnt really understand why they would gladly let you prepare for the journey ahead
Not in the case of Glitterworlds, that's their entire point. On the other hand, Urbworlds are confirmed to hide human-sacrificing cult deep underneath.
I don't think the transcendent world is unlivable. It remains the home of an archotech. So yes, if the archotech wants you dead. It's not an F but a Z in terms of habitability But if he's benevolent, he could probably keep a segment of the planet for human beings, offering them even better living conditions than on a glitterworld. so there you have it, archotech remains for me the only one that cannot be classified because.... Well archotech
i would say that transcendent worlds will be either f tier or s tier with no in-between. if the archotech is benevolent, i could see it allowing humanity to live and thrive on its "body", providing them with whatever they desire. of the archotech is evil or just doesn't care, it's probably gonna be f tier though.
So essentially a 50/50. I would agree with that if it were not that there are still no reports of humans ever living on transcendent worlds, although it could have happened and it was simply never documented.
@@thenightarchives4148 i mean, we DO have documented proof that some archotechs WILL allow people to live on them without killing them, though. they just wipe their memories when they leave, which is honestly pretty fair.
Considering how many colonists I've found with medieval backstories in base-game, I'd say medieval worlds are probably better than you make them out to be but still not great.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
> You arrive on an Animal world
> There will be no raids
> "This is going to be easy !"
> Randy sends you 500 manhunting guinea pigs
*re zero flashbacks intensifies*
Close the door bruh
Babe wake up theres a new Night Archives video
No sleep allowed
Yes honey...
I personally would put Indworlds into C tier. The Industrial revolution is known for being particularly rough on workers - so if you are not of high statue... you might be working dangerous jobs a lot.
Apart from that you need to hope that the big-shots don't figure out how great war is, now tha they can mass produce weapons, bombs and tanks.
Honestly, good point.
Nice recap of the different planet types! Though, one thing I'm pretty sure you forgot to think about is whether you're being drop podded or born in the planet. Because, if you've never seen a tree, why would urbworlds be unnatural?
I don't think they would be unnatural, but if you are born on one, you'll just never know what a tree looks like, perhaps only from stories, movies or textbooks.
@@thenightarchives4148 (TLDR at bottom) I think I made my point poorly, what I mean is that one super philosophical question:
If you've never known about a life better than yours, can you really think about one?
I think the people born there, living their entire mental and physical life there, wouldn't know of many lives better than their own, and so would be happy with readjusting what they have every so often.
As they say, change is as good as a vacation, angling your bed 180* is a MASSIVE dopamine boost.
The fact is. To them, it's not perfect, there would still be an upper and lower class. But, you'd think of your life as a B+, so why rate it lower?
We have better lives here than on urbworlds. We have ecosystems, for one. We have movies about lives better than ours, famous people with more money than we can count. We can think about much better lives than they can.
Realistically, it wouldn't be the best life, but it'd be one of the best you know of. Which one matters more?
TLDR: I personally think it'd be a pretty good life, because you don't know better.
Sorry about the text brick, I'm just really enthusiastic about this chunk of philosophy.
"You're definitely not gonna be lonely here"
As experience shows, the more overcrowded a living place is the more isolated people become from each other which you can quite easily see by the state of midern big cities like Tokyo and such. It gets especially bad in an intense capitalistic environment.
So, no, living in an urbworld would be hella depressing.
Rent will definitely be $3500 for a one bedroom there and the place will smell like piss and homelessness like LA on a good day.
2:11 I feel like the terraforming Agents would have the decency to plant some Healroot, as they have on the Rimworlds.
But I doubt they will drop pod industrial or glitter medicine in middle of nowhere.
At least on rimworld there *are* people and orbital traders visit for generating profit of underdeveloped communities. Or maybe some people might fight with space pirates or something.
@@mirasmussabekov4897 well, who said it was the Terraforming Agents who drop Pod all that Stuff in?
Healroot can only do so much though.
@@thenightarchives4148 true, but it's better than having no medicine at all!
Glitterworlds always gave me "Logan's Run" vibes with a little bit of "The Giver".
Maybe I'm just jaded, but I don't see that type of civilization happening without something _very_ sinister going on behind the scenes.
That's the point of Glitterworlds. Human utopias were everything is perfect. Is what makes them such a sci-fi concept
Hey! I establish colony on oceanic planet countless time at Persean Sector. The place habitable, people eat good with aquaponic (Goddamn Sindria have monopoly of Volturnian Lobster), plenty of organics (earthen call that black gold) for light industry and space suit, and I put that in either C (at least for the first settler) or A (if you the native born there) and everyone there can swim.
You know if a medival world slowly collided with a Steamworld (like how the moon was formed) you'd literally have an elder scrolls planet imagine steam robots surviving the impact and just chilling with the knights Alternatively they can become just like the ancient steam robots from Skyrim kinda funny really
In that case everyone on both planets would probably die from the force, shockwave, and heat of two planets slamming into one another but its kind of a cool concept
I mostly agree but I'd put oceanworlds in D tier rather than F. It would be like subnautica in rimworld. You would need adapted technology and housing but I'm sure people would manage and if they've got the technology then it might not even be that bad. If it's an uninhabited oceanworld though, you wouldn't survive.
Yeah, feels like a wildcard honestly.
I was ganna say with that philosophy it could even be a C tier with bioshock-like cities
Would 100% go live on a Rimworld for a chance to get my hands on that sweet archotechnology and age reversal
Blasphemy against the archotech gods thou shall be smote
almost another 1000, that was quick
I have a feeling you'll be big one day. Keep it up brother.
It's gonna happen, I can feel it too :)
Okay. But what if I *am* a bacterium. Glass Worlds sure sound like a kushy place to live...
Wouldn't you rather be a bacterium in a sprawling jungle?
@@thenightarchives4148 Too many ICKY! multicellular organisms, they're a bad influence! Things were better back in the Proterozoic...
@@Madcat1331 idk man, I live in a jungle and the fellow bacterium are quite nice, just as long as you don’t bring up sanitation
If midworlds are A tier than ı cannot imagine what B or C can be like lul
Man, I wish I could sponsor you, but they have all transactions blocked here in Russia. Thx for the video
@@spaceenjoyer8304 No worries man. Comments and likes are appreciated as well :)
I too would hate to live in a place where I don’t even naturally die or feel any pain whatsoever (fyi I was talking about the title)
But according to the wiki, the Deathworlds and Deadworlds are different. Deathworld: everything wants to kill you. Deadworld: This planet hasn't been checked yet because it's probably worthless but we'll never know until we see it. But yeah, generally uninhabitable.
From 5:49 to 6:10 it makes me feel... GOOD 😇 because the fact that I also have food, a house, and access to RUclips, despite what is said in the timestamp... I am happy 😄 that I am alive and well. Thank you night archives!
😊
We going to a rimworld with this one 🗣️🔥🔥
Comment for the algorithm
I have a Headcannon for a world Called:Shambler-worlds, as you can expect, its inhabited by Shamblers only and small groups of humans and very fortified strongholds. In your Opinion which would Shamdbler-Worlds hold? (very Likely in either D-F Tier)
D towards C perhaps
considering anomaly loves the idea of sending you 5 billion different threats in the span of a year I'd be surprised if there aren't worlds completely overrun by shamblers or flesh beasts or anything anomaly throws.
I like to imagine that worlds mainly populated by yttakins are deemed as animal worlds because people fork above just see wolves 😂
nice tier list
Thanks!
what about THE THRONE WORLD?
Honestly I want to go from a glitter world to a rimworld. I am an anarchist so… the glitter is comfortable but nah fam I am just gonna jack a spaceship and make my drug empire.
Also based farm pick. If we have say something like 2075 level of tech from less war being a farmer is going to be pretty cool.
A nice farm is easy to operate right now after a few years in job training you will get for existing.
The wealthy explorer scenario is litarelly what you want btw.Some glitterworld citizen leaving for exploratipon and adventure and they start with plenty of supplies too so even tho they wouldnt really understand why they would gladly let you prepare for the journey ahead
...can you take on a murderhobo with a knife and 0 melee skill...or a mad hare?
@@memewarranty Yeah the turrets will blow it away.
Welcomeeeee colonistsssss
Welcomeee
I think the glitterworld needs to reevaluated. Every utopia hides dark secrets. on the surface it is perfect, but in the shadows there be monsters.
Not in the case of Glitterworlds, that's their entire point. On the other hand, Urbworlds are confirmed to hide human-sacrificing cult deep underneath.
I don't think the transcendent world is unlivable. It remains the home of an archotech. So yes, if the archotech wants you dead. It's not an F but a Z in terms of habitability But if he's benevolent, he could probably keep a segment of the planet for human beings, offering them even better living conditions than on a glitterworld. so there you have it, archotech remains for me the only one that cannot be classified because.... Well archotech
Transcendant worlds surpass ranking. The idea of "quality of life" on one is literally "undefined".
i would say that transcendent worlds will be either f tier or s tier with no in-between. if the archotech is benevolent, i could see it allowing humanity to live and thrive on its "body", providing them with whatever they desire. of the archotech is evil or just doesn't care, it's probably gonna be f tier though.
So essentially a 50/50. I would agree with that if it were not that there are still no reports of humans ever living on transcendent worlds, although it could have happened and it was simply never documented.
@@thenightarchives4148 i mean, we DO have documented proof that some archotechs WILL allow people to live on them without killing them, though. they just wipe their memories when they leave, which is honestly pretty fair.
Dino worlds are part of the lore? And if they are why haven't we had more dinosaurs added to the game or any at all that would be a cool update DLC
They are part of the lore due to the existence of the Megasloth, which was a pretty old animal too brought back by scientists, similarly to dinosaurs.
Technically you can have dino worlds with mods
So sad we'll only ever see Rimworlds.
It would be a cool dlc to be able to travel to other worlds
@@buddatobiI would just give new planet types to start new colonies on
@@buddatobi It'd be cool to ravage and conquer other worlds
live love night archive
Glitterworld is the best!
Me when new vid
Read the title as plant categories xd
@@exordiuschristensen Plant categories are: Wood - Food - Funny
Considering how many colonists I've found with medieval backstories in base-game, I'd say medieval worlds are probably better than you make them out to be but still not great.
Well, the ones you found are the ones who were still alive.
Does war-crimes even matter on these kinds of topics😂
Comment for algorithm
Iceworld + Steamworld = ???
Frostpunk
Wait there are planet types?
I have a full video on it. I recommend you check it out :)
@@thenightarchives4148best video of all time and it was the first one I saw
Insert Text Here
Hi
Hello!