My friend Paul did speak with Jesus. I'm sure you have read acts and galatians. Paul says he received the gospel by revelation from Christ. Paul also directed the saints to follow me as I follow Christ. Keep digging, but don't get buried by your agenda. Thank you for hard work to bring forth truth..
@@quamich4 dear sir, I am aware of the claims that Paul makes concerning his visitation from the Lord. However, I have many, many things to share that would completely rebuttal this claim and even if the claim was true, this does not mean that everything that Paul taught, especially when he doesn't quote Jesus of Nazareth who walks the Earth is above reproach. We must test what Paul preaches whether it be true or not. I highly recommend that you subscribe and watch some of my previous videos as I am going through the entire teachings of Paul and explaining how he is not an apostle and that even though he claims to see the Lord that this does not qualify you to have an authority greater than that than the 12 apostles and the Lord Jesus Christ and or the prophets and or Moses. May God bless you
Paul preached Christ. The gospel, the simplicity that is in Christ. The disciples considered him as an apostle, and Jesus said that he is the chosen one to take the gospel to the gentiles. The scriptures does not contradict itself. If it were the case, then God does not exist and everything is relative.@@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502
PART 2 of this message. In this teaching you are going to learn the teachings of the father vs the antichrist. Please join me in this biblical study that I believe if you study it out will change your family and line for the better forever. ruclips.net/video/siepiFtMPio/видео.htmlsi=_fg2b94KLODNp9sO
So, are you blinded? Romans 11:25-26 states “For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.” (And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:) Israel = Jacob = 12 twelves tribes of Israel. Christians are not under the Jacob/Israel umbrella. Romans 11:27 further states “For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.” NOtice the word "They" not to "Us". This shows that Israel and Christian are not the same. There is a clear distinction. Christian did not become Israelites. Also, notice that further in verse 28, ‘As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.’ The fathers are plural, not Father’s, which means it is not referring to God, but it is the Jews forefathers’ sake that is the Jews are still beloved by God. A comma precedes it; hence, the election also refers to the Jews, not Christians. Romans 11:15-23 states that Christians are grafted onto the Olive tree. But, that does not mean Christians became Israelites/Jews. Paul reminds the Gentile Christians that it is only by God’s grace that they can be grafted into the “tree” of God - the “root” of which is Israel. In addition, It is stated "Do not boast against the branches... you do not support the root, but the root supports you:" Lest Gentiles think of themselves as superior to Jews, Paul also reminds them that the root supports the branches - not the other way around. This shows that there is a distinction between Christians and Israelites/Jews. Also grafted in meant that we still maintain our own branch characteristic. And, we are not turned into the natural Olive tree branch. So, it is wrong to say that Christians become Jews/Israelites. My main points are: Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Abraham? Yes, according to Galatians 3:29. Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Issac? Not that I know of. Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Ishmael? Not that I know of. Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Jacob/Israel? Not that I know of. For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: (Romans 11:13) For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: (Ephesians 3:1-2) The age of grace interrupted God’s calling out of the Kingdom church, and postponed their program. However, Christ’s earthly Kingdom is still their hope and the books of Hebrews - Revelation were written to prepare those Saints (had the age of grace ended in their life time) and those who will live in the time of the future tribulation, to endure the events covered in the book of Revelation. This is the next event in their program. Since Acts 8:1 and 11:19 we are told that the Kingdom Saints were scattered. Eventually they were scattered as far as the places where they are when Peter writes to them in I Peter 1:1 and as James 1:1 simply says: “to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad.” These are the Seven Churches John is writing to in Revelation 1-3 and in each case telling them of their strengths and weakness and what they need to do to “overcome.” It is the events that follow in Revelation 4-19 that they are being prepared to overcome. They must endure to the end to be saved into the Kingdom. Many must die in the process of overcoming the Anti-Christ and his mark. In reading the letters to the Seven Churches it is easy to see that they are Jewish Kingdom Churches. Peter, James and John fulfilled their agreement with Paul in Galatians 2:9 that Paul “should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.” The “circumcision” being the believing remnant of Israel. That is exactly who Peter, James and John write to in their epistles. Also, just to point out the Jewish-ness of the 7 churches in Revelation consider the setting of the vision of Chapter 1:12-20. The “Candlesticks” and the “Angels” who are the “Messengers to the 7 Churches.” The “Candlesticks” were the light of God in Israel’s Temple. “Angels” according to Hebrews 1:14 through 2:5 are “ministering spirits” to those who are “heirs” of the “world to come.” That is Israel’s “salvation” - Hebrews; and the Kingdom the Lord Jesus began to preach unto them. Then note: “remove thy candlestick” - Rev 2:5; “synagogue of Satan” - Rev 2:9; “Balaam” and “children of Israel” - Rev 2:14; “Jezebel” and “my servants” - Rev 2:20; “the key of David” - Rev 3:7; “Jews and are not” - Rev 3:9; and the promise “grant to sit with me in my throne” - Rev 3:21; are all terms and promises concerning the nation of Israel. Revelation 3:9 states: Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
There is something very concerning in your argument and it’s this…. You haven’t listed NOT ONE scripture from the Tanakh. All of your references are from the Brit Chadashah. Which means you are interpreting from it. But the apostles foundation was in the Tanakh and when they present a case they refer back to it and state the origin. That’s why you see in the Brit Chadashah EVERYTIME they say it is written they are pointing back to the Tanakh. Even Messiah did the same thing. HE ALWAYS points back to the foundation which is THE LAW & THE PROPHETS. There is nothing New in the Brit Chadashah for it reveals or expounds upon that which is written in the Tanakh. The foundation of the Brit Chadashah (New Testament) IS the Tanakh (Old Testament) YOU CANNOT AND WILL NOT UNDERSTAND what Messiah or the apostles are talking about if you don’t have the same foundation as they did.
@@JahRootsRadio TLDR, just say you reject Paul's teaching/epistle as a whole and reject him as the apostle of the Gentiles (Romans 11:13) John 1:17 states For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. He would remove the curse due to Adam’s fall (Genesis 5 :21-29) He would bring salvation to the Gentile nations (Isaiah 42 :1-4; Isaiah 49 :1-13) He would be rejected at first (Isaiah 49 :1-13; Isaiah 52 :13-53 :12; Zechariah 11 :1-17; Zechariah 12 :10; Psalm 22; Psalm 110 :1-7) He would only be accepted by a small believing remnant of the people (Zechariah 11 :1-17) He would appear to fail but in fact be successful (Isaiah 42 :1-4) His death would be substitutionary (Isaiah 52 :13-53 :12) He would bring justification to those who believe in Him (Isaiah 52:13-53 :12) He will rule over Israel in the Messianic Kingdom (Psalm 110 :1-7) As spoken by Jesus to the 11 Apostle after his resurrection. And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high. (Luke 24:44-49) And they did that in Acts 3:18-19 which states, But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled. Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord. They have to repent/turn to Christ, and be converted so that their Sins may be blotted out when times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord. 1. **Acts 2: The Day of Pentecost and the Outpouring of the Holy Spirit (Gospel to Israel)** - **Acts 2**: At Pentecost, Peter preaches to a Jewish audience in Jerusalem about **Jesus as the Messiah**, calling them to repentance and faith. This was still within the framework of the **gospel of the kingdom**. The message emphasized **Jesus’s resurrection** as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies and the establishment of the kingdom. - **Acts 2:36**: "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ." - The focus here is still on **Israel**-Peter is calling Israel to recognize Jesus as their Messiah and repent. 2. **Acts 7: Stephen’s Speech and the Rejection of the Gospel by Israel** - **Acts 7**: Stephen gives a detailed defense of the gospel to the Jewish leaders, but they reject his message and stone him to death. This event marks a **turning point** where Israel’s leadership **formally rejects the message** of the kingdom. - Stephen’s martyrdom signals a hardening of Israel toward the gospel, preparing the way for a broader Gentile focus in the coming chapters. 3. **Acts 9: The Conversion of Paul (Apostle to the Gentiles)** - **Acts 9:15**: "But the Lord said unto him [Ananias], Go thy way: for he [Paul] is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel." - The **conversion of Paul** is a crucial moment. Paul is explicitly called to be an **apostle to the Gentiles**, signaling a shift toward the **gospel of grace** being extended beyond the Jewish nation to the Gentiles. - Although Paul initially preaches to both Jews and Gentiles, his ministry increasingly focuses on the Gentile world. 4. **Acts 10: Peter’s Vision and the Gentile Cornelius** - **Acts 10**: Peter’s vision of the sheet with unclean animals and his encounter with **Cornelius** (a Gentile) marks a significant turning point. Peter is shown that the gospel is not just for the Jews but also for the Gentiles. - **Acts 10:34-35**: "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." - This event broadens the scope of the gospel, opening the door for Gentile inclusion without the requirement of becoming Jewish proselytes or following the Mosaic Law. 5. **Acts 13: Paul’s First Missionary Journey and Focus on Gentiles** - **Acts 13:46**: "Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you [the Jews]: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles." - This statement by Paul during his first missionary journey is a clear **declaration of the shift** from the focus on Israel to a focus on the **Gentiles**. From this point on, Paul consistently brings the gospel to Gentile nations, and this becomes the dominant focus of his ministry. 6. **Acts 15: The Jerusalem Council** - **Acts 15**: The Jerusalem Council addresses the question of whether Gentiles need to follow the **Law of Moses** to be saved. The decision confirms that **Gentiles are saved by grace through faith** without the requirements of the law, marking a clear distinction from the Jewish-centric **gospel of the kingdom**. - **Acts 15:11**: "But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they." - This solidifies the doctrine of salvation by **grace alone**, apart from the law, which becomes the hallmark of the **gospel of the Church**. ### **Key Moment: The Transition Occurs Gradually but Is Fully Established by Acts 13** The transition from the **gospel of the kingdom** to the **gospel of grace** happens gradually but is fully established in **Acts 13**, where Paul explicitly states that he is turning to the Gentiles. Here, Paul’s message of salvation by grace through faith is directed to a Gentile audience, distinct from the earlier focus on Israel and the message of the kingdom. - **Acts 13** marks a pivotal moment where the focus shifts primarily to the **Gentile mission**. - **Paul’s letters**, such as **Galatians** and **Romans**, further explain this transition and emphasize the **new covenant** of grace through faith in Christ, apart from the Mosaic Law. ### **Conclusion:** The transition from the **gospel of the kingdom** to the **gospel of grace** for the Church can best be seen unfolding between **Acts 7** (the rejection of the kingdom message by Israel) and **Acts 13** (Paul’s formal shift to the Gentiles). By this point, the focus of the gospel has moved away from the offer of the kingdom to Israel and toward the Gentiles, with Paul as the leading apostle for this new phase in God's plan. Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (2 Timothy 2:15) Identifying the beginnings and endings of the divisions, essential to correct interpretation, requires diligent, God-guided study; much truth lies beneath the surface. Failure to do so guarantees miss-interpretation, which is the fountainhead of false doctrine. “It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter” (Proverbs 25:2). A complete understanding of the Apostle Paul’s exhortation to “rightly DIVIDE the word of truth” in 2 Tim. 2:15 [emphasis mine] hinges on the comprehension of five interrelated subjects: 1st The difference between God’s dealings with the three people groups listed in 1 Corinthians 10:32. 2rd The Distinctions between the various Dispensations. 3nd The Contrast between Law and Grace. 4th The Mystery of the Body of Christ. 5th Signs and Wonders during the Church Age.
I just subscribed! Found the short watchmen video with shofars blasting! Content looks great! I'll watch this video tonight! Which other videos do you recommend I start with?
@@ShuwshanEmeq-xb3mk thank you so much for following along. I would recommend that you start in all of them, but I do want to make you aware that I have started teaching advanced things concerning the kingdom of God and I will shortly be teaching the gospels of Jesus + the Torah and the prophets. But I have felt led to start where I'm at. But I will be going through the scriptures to encourage you to become a disciple of the Lord yourself personally. Thank you very much
@ShuwshanEmeq-xb3mk please check my playlist as all of my teachings that I do are in successive order and they build upon each other and I have several series that I have started.
@@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 More Christians need to study Church History. OK then... Marcion was a second century heretic. Believing he was following St. Paul, he made a clean separation between the religion of the Old Testament and the New. There are other similarities between what he taught and Dispensationalism, but I encourage folk to do their own in depth study. RE "ontological dualism": Marcion differs from Dispensationalists in a major way in one area. He attributed the difference between the OT and the NT to their each being the product of a different God. The OT was from Yahweh, the just God of the Jews. The NT was from ABBA---the Father of Jesus Christ---a God of Mercy and Love. He is usually classed with the gnostics, but that is inaccurate. Gnostics taught salvation by secret knowledge. Marcion taught salvation by faith.
@@mikewark6408 I am sorry to hear. We did not delete your comment. If your willing repost. I have studied marcion and alot of early church history. I thought it would be nice to hear from another in the family of GOD share their insights concerning this matter for others to read. Thanks for subscribing.
I remembered something I noticed some time ago. In Mathew 24 Jesus says someone will come saying “I am the “Christ””. He could be identifying them by the NAME they use for the resurrected spiritual being. “CHRIST”
@@stevenschmitz8901 yes I agree totally I’ve thought of this many times. It’s interesting that the 12 apostles always call the Messiah Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Kind of like saying I am God without saying I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob . There is a clear distinction
Matthew 28 18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, *_All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth._* Revelation 13 7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: *_and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations._* Why do these 2 verses line up with each other?
@ not sure your point. The word power is not in rev 13:7, just “it was given”. Jesus had authority in heaven and earth. Beast only given IT, whatever that is, on earth.
I appreciate your work and look forward to more of your in-depth studies. Question though-wouldn't it be hard to deny that all believers are a part of Israel, even through Paul's writings? Take Galatians 3:29 (KJV), for example: "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." This clearly connects believers in Christ to Abraham’s lineage and the promises made to him. Paul also reinforces this idea in Romans 9:6 (KJV): "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel," emphasizing that true Israel is not defined solely by physical descent. And in Ephesians 2:12-13 (KJV): "That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise... But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ." Would love to hear your thoughts!
@@blazeroundhouse6595 thank you for your comment. I will circle back and give you a more theological answer but I will give you the best that I can at this moment. I believe that we are dealing with many different views today and in history. There are religious groups that believe that everyone is grafted into the tree or the family of Abraham as he is the father of many nations, but they do not necessarily believe that you are of the line or the branch that is specifically Israel, meaning that you have the same requirements on you that the Israelites had that came before the father at Mount Sinai and that the prophets prophesied to and that Jesus came to to preach to in person. I think there's another group that believes that we are grafted into Israel but yet we are not truly Israelites. We are sojourners or gentiles living amongst the Israelites or what they might would call Jews and therefore the sojourners have a different set of laws and expectations on them then the Jews Then there is a group that regardless of their views as how we are grafted in. They are literally saying God is saving the gentiles with a completely different set of requirements, even separate from the teachings of Jesus and that it's basically only through the teachings of Paul that they are to follow and that at the end of the gentile dispensation that God will then turn and begin to love the Jews or the Israelites again bringing them back into the covenant and this is what I would call the greater adherence to dispensationalism. No matter how we slice it or dice it, the Catholics, the Protestants and any and all other forms of religion today do not obey Moses nor the prophets, nor the words of the Lord Jesus Christ. In total they are either partially removing Jesus or completely removing jesus's ministry and their life and requirements primarily come from Paul. I think potentially some might would come to the conclusion that we are Israel from Paul's writings, however, I believe they would come to a perverted or twisted view of how they fit in with Israel. Meaning they would maybe always see themselves as gentiles or in some new kind of covenant that would make them different than the gospel Peter, James and John instruct and all of the covenant keeping believing Jews or Israelites going back all the way to Abraham. As Paul in Galatians clearly states that we aren't to keep the law of Moses nor the festivals nor the Sabbath nor new moons and other things. And if we do so, we are forfeiting the grace that God has now bestowed upon us through the cross. Remember, Paul becomes all things to all people that he might win some. It is clear to me that his message changes based upon the audience that he is with. I once was listening to a missionary that said that the Muslims have the same kind of ministry based upon the population that they are serving or ministering to, such as in Iran they would preach a very hard Islamic faith. Whereas here in the United States everything is love and joy and peace and they would not bring out the depths of their message because if they did so it would be highly rejected. I believe Paul follows in the same suit. I would appreciate your thoughts as well. This subject at hand and the Kingdom of heaven and all that we are seeking to know and learn from the father is so big and so vast so I myself am continuing to learn
@@thecure728 I am so sorry for the ads. I have requested that the ads be taken off and I have done the correct settings but I was told by another person that they will not remove the ads until you get to a certain number of subscribers. I will try again. I do not want ads and I do not get paid by them. Freely you have received and freely you must give
Actually the House of Israel was scattered and sown around the world ... If you read the Scottish Declaration of Independence from 1320 , it says that the Irish are from the house of Israel. It further states how they came out of Egypt , sinned against YHVH causing their dispertion . They were later called Scythians, and made their way over the caucus mountains to Spain then to Ireland.. Think the inhabitants of Ireland were once called Tuthan De Dannan which translates House of Dan .....
@@murph19611 yes I've read these, many people are descendants of Jacob in their blood but at this point all are highly mixed with the nations. Esau was direct blood from Isaac but was not apart of the house of spiritual Israel, Manasseh and Ephraim were bloodlines of Jacob but were not apart of the House of Israel until Jacob adopted them back in egypt. No one on earth right now are apart of the house of Israel unless they are adopted back in so to speak through Jesus Christ even though they may be direct bloodlines of Jacob whether they be 5% or 100% of his blood ( Jacob. ). According to scripture anyone could be added or cut off from the house of Israel based upon their adherence to the covenant. Jesus came for the nations building up the house of Israel.
@@murph19611 please read hosea ch 1-2 it says how Israel is not my people but then says a new covenant would be offered and then those who were not called my people shall be called my people again. Pre-requisite they must enter the covenant. The house of Cornelius was a family that one of the first to enter this promise. As the covenant made to the beast of the field, the field of the air, and creeping things was reminded of and shown again to Peter which would have reminded him of hosea. From that vision the salvation of and acceptance of Cornelius as one of them became affirmed. Blessings.
@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 my dna is 100 % Irish...I know what the Holy Spirit has taught me ...that said Revelation speaks of 144,000 with 12,000 from every tribe except Dan.... are they mixed , because the bible is very clear ... Or this ...Genesis 49:16 KJV - Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel.
@@WashYourWorld thank you sir. May God have all the glory. Please consider subscribing. I have many other things that I would love to share and I highly appreciate when people engage and comment and share with me things that they have learned. May you have a blessed Day
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
My friend Paul did speak with Jesus. I'm sure you have read acts and galatians. Paul says he received the gospel by revelation from Christ. Paul also directed the saints to follow me as I follow Christ. Keep digging, but don't get buried by your agenda. Thank you for hard work to bring forth truth..
@@quamich4 dear sir, I am aware of the claims that Paul makes concerning his visitation from the Lord. However, I have many, many things to share that would completely rebuttal this claim and even if the claim was true, this does not mean that everything that Paul taught, especially when he doesn't quote Jesus of Nazareth who walks the Earth is above reproach. We must test what Paul preaches whether it be true or not. I highly recommend that you subscribe and watch some of my previous videos as I am going through the entire teachings of Paul and explaining how he is not an apostle and that even though he claims to see the Lord that this does not qualify you to have an authority greater than that than the 12 apostles and the Lord Jesus Christ and or the prophets and or Moses. May God bless you
Paul preached Christ. The gospel, the simplicity that is in Christ. The disciples considered him as an apostle, and Jesus said that he is the chosen one to take the gospel to the gentiles. The scriptures does not contradict itself. If it were the case, then God does not exist and everything is relative.@@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502
@@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502and Paul never claimed to be greater than the prophets, Moses or Jesus.
New series from this channel.
ruclips.net/video/siepiFtMPio/видео.htmlsi=uKsEBgX5-dd_EMq8
PART 2 of this message. In this teaching you are going to learn the teachings of the father vs the antichrist. Please join me in this biblical study that I believe if you study it out will change your family and line for the better forever. ruclips.net/video/siepiFtMPio/видео.htmlsi=_fg2b94KLODNp9sO
So, are you blinded?
Romans 11:25-26 states
“For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.”
(And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:)
Israel = Jacob = 12 twelves tribes of Israel. Christians are not under the Jacob/Israel umbrella.
Romans 11:27 further states “For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.” NOtice the word "They" not to "Us". This shows that Israel and Christian are not the same. There is a clear distinction. Christian did not become Israelites.
Also, notice that further in verse 28,
‘As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.’
The fathers are plural, not Father’s, which means it is not referring to God, but it is the Jews forefathers’ sake that is the Jews are still beloved by God. A comma precedes it; hence, the election also refers to the Jews, not Christians.
Romans 11:15-23 states that Christians are grafted onto the Olive tree. But, that does not mean Christians became Israelites/Jews.
Paul reminds the Gentile Christians that it is only by God’s grace that they can be grafted into the “tree” of God - the “root” of which is Israel. In addition, It is stated "Do not boast against the branches... you do not support the root, but the root supports you:" Lest Gentiles think of themselves as superior to Jews, Paul also reminds them that the root supports the branches - not the other way around. This shows that there is a distinction between Christians and Israelites/Jews.
Also grafted in meant that we still maintain our own branch characteristic. And, we are not turned into the natural Olive tree branch. So, it is wrong to say that Christians become Jews/Israelites.
My main points are:
Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Abraham? Yes, according to Galatians 3:29.
Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Issac? Not that I know of.
Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Ishmael? Not that I know of.
Did Gentile Christian inherit promises from God to Jacob/Israel? Not that I know of.
For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: (Romans 11:13)
For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: (Ephesians 3:1-2)
The age of grace interrupted God’s calling out of the Kingdom church, and postponed their program. However, Christ’s earthly Kingdom is still their hope and the books of Hebrews - Revelation were written to prepare those Saints (had the age of grace ended in their life time) and those who will live in the time of the future tribulation, to endure the events covered in the book of Revelation. This is the next event in their program. Since Acts 8:1 and 11:19 we are told that the Kingdom Saints were scattered. Eventually they were scattered as far as the places where they are when Peter writes to them in I Peter 1:1 and as James 1:1 simply says: “to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad.” These are the Seven Churches John is writing to in Revelation 1-3 and in each case telling them of their strengths and weakness and what they need to do to “overcome.” It is the events that follow in Revelation 4-19 that they are being prepared to overcome. They must endure to the end to be saved into the Kingdom. Many must die in the process of overcoming the Anti-Christ and his mark. In reading the letters to the Seven Churches it is easy to see that they are Jewish Kingdom Churches.
Peter, James and John fulfilled their agreement with Paul in Galatians 2:9 that Paul “should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.” The “circumcision” being the believing remnant of Israel. That is exactly who Peter, James and John write to in their epistles.
Also, just to point out the Jewish-ness of the 7 churches in Revelation consider the setting of the vision of Chapter 1:12-20. The “Candlesticks” and the “Angels” who are the “Messengers to the 7 Churches.”
The “Candlesticks” were the light of God in Israel’s Temple. “Angels” according to Hebrews 1:14 through 2:5 are “ministering spirits” to those who are “heirs” of the “world to come.” That is Israel’s “salvation” - Hebrews; and the Kingdom the Lord Jesus began to preach unto them.
Then note: “remove thy candlestick” - Rev 2:5; “synagogue of Satan” - Rev 2:9; “Balaam” and “children of Israel” - Rev 2:14; “Jezebel” and “my servants” - Rev 2:20; “the key of David” - Rev 3:7; “Jews and are not” - Rev 3:9; and the promise “grant to sit with me in my throne” - Rev 3:21; are all terms and promises concerning the nation of Israel.
Revelation 3:9 states:
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
There is something very concerning in your argument and it’s this….
You haven’t listed NOT ONE scripture from the Tanakh.
All of your references are from the Brit Chadashah.
Which means you are interpreting from it.
But the apostles foundation was in the Tanakh and when they present a case they refer back to it and state the origin. That’s why you see in the Brit Chadashah EVERYTIME they say it is written they are pointing back to the Tanakh.
Even Messiah did the same thing. HE ALWAYS points back to the foundation which is THE LAW & THE PROPHETS.
There is nothing New in the Brit Chadashah for it reveals or expounds upon that which is written in the Tanakh.
The foundation of the Brit Chadashah (New Testament) IS the Tanakh (Old Testament)
YOU CANNOT AND WILL NOT UNDERSTAND what Messiah or the apostles are talking about if you don’t have the same foundation as they did.
Grafting believers onto the tree does make them Israel.
@ 👊🏾put it here. My brother you get it. You are awake!!
@@JahRootsRadio 👊
@@JahRootsRadio
TLDR, just say you reject Paul's teaching/epistle as a whole and reject him as the apostle of the Gentiles (Romans 11:13)
John 1:17 states
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
He would remove the curse due to Adam’s fall (Genesis 5 :21-29)
He would bring salvation to the Gentile nations (Isaiah 42 :1-4; Isaiah 49 :1-13)
He would be rejected at first (Isaiah 49 :1-13; Isaiah 52 :13-53 :12; Zechariah 11 :1-17; Zechariah 12 :10; Psalm 22; Psalm 110 :1-7)
He would only be accepted by a small believing remnant of the people (Zechariah 11 :1-17)
He would appear to fail but in fact be successful (Isaiah 42 :1-4)
His death would be substitutionary (Isaiah 52 :13-53 :12)
He would bring justification to those who believe in Him (Isaiah 52:13-53 :12)
He will rule over Israel in the Messianic Kingdom (Psalm 110 :1-7)
As spoken by Jesus to the 11 Apostle after his resurrection.
And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high. (Luke 24:44-49)
And they did that in Acts 3:18-19 which states,
But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled. Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.
They have to repent/turn to Christ, and be converted so that their Sins may be blotted out when times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.
1. **Acts 2: The Day of Pentecost and the Outpouring of the Holy Spirit (Gospel to Israel)**
- **Acts 2**: At Pentecost, Peter preaches to a Jewish audience in Jerusalem about **Jesus as the Messiah**, calling them to repentance and faith. This was still within the framework of the **gospel of the kingdom**. The message emphasized **Jesus’s resurrection** as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies and the establishment of the kingdom.
- **Acts 2:36**: "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ."
- The focus here is still on **Israel**-Peter is calling Israel to recognize Jesus as their Messiah and repent.
2. **Acts 7: Stephen’s Speech and the Rejection of the Gospel by Israel**
- **Acts 7**: Stephen gives a detailed defense of the gospel to the Jewish leaders, but they reject his message and stone him to death. This event marks a **turning point** where Israel’s leadership **formally rejects the message** of the kingdom.
- Stephen’s martyrdom signals a hardening of Israel toward the gospel, preparing the way for a broader Gentile focus in the coming chapters.
3. **Acts 9: The Conversion of Paul (Apostle to the Gentiles)**
- **Acts 9:15**: "But the Lord said unto him [Ananias], Go thy way: for he [Paul] is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel."
- The **conversion of Paul** is a crucial moment. Paul is explicitly called to be an **apostle to the Gentiles**, signaling a shift toward the **gospel of grace** being extended beyond the Jewish nation to the Gentiles.
- Although Paul initially preaches to both Jews and Gentiles, his ministry increasingly focuses on the Gentile world.
4. **Acts 10: Peter’s Vision and the Gentile Cornelius**
- **Acts 10**: Peter’s vision of the sheet with unclean animals and his encounter with **Cornelius** (a Gentile) marks a significant turning point. Peter is shown that the gospel is not just for the Jews but also for the Gentiles.
- **Acts 10:34-35**: "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him."
- This event broadens the scope of the gospel, opening the door for Gentile inclusion without the requirement of becoming Jewish proselytes or following the Mosaic Law.
5. **Acts 13: Paul’s First Missionary Journey and Focus on Gentiles**
- **Acts 13:46**: "Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you [the Jews]: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles."
- This statement by Paul during his first missionary journey is a clear **declaration of the shift** from the focus on Israel to a focus on the **Gentiles**. From this point on, Paul consistently brings the gospel to Gentile nations, and this becomes the dominant focus of his ministry.
6. **Acts 15: The Jerusalem Council**
- **Acts 15**: The Jerusalem Council addresses the question of whether Gentiles need to follow the **Law of Moses** to be saved. The decision confirms that **Gentiles are saved by grace through faith** without the requirements of the law, marking a clear distinction from the Jewish-centric **gospel of the kingdom**.
- **Acts 15:11**: "But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they."
- This solidifies the doctrine of salvation by **grace alone**, apart from the law, which becomes the hallmark of the **gospel of the Church**.
### **Key Moment: The Transition Occurs Gradually but Is Fully Established by Acts 13**
The transition from the **gospel of the kingdom** to the **gospel of grace** happens gradually but is fully established in **Acts 13**, where Paul explicitly states that he is turning to the Gentiles. Here, Paul’s message of salvation by grace through faith is directed to a Gentile audience, distinct from the earlier focus on Israel and the message of the kingdom.
- **Acts 13** marks a pivotal moment where the focus shifts primarily to the **Gentile mission**.
- **Paul’s letters**, such as **Galatians** and **Romans**, further explain this transition and emphasize the **new covenant** of grace through faith in Christ, apart from the Mosaic Law.
### **Conclusion:**
The transition from the **gospel of the kingdom** to the **gospel of grace** for the Church can best be seen unfolding between **Acts 7** (the rejection of the kingdom message by Israel) and **Acts 13** (Paul’s formal shift to the Gentiles). By this point, the focus of the gospel has moved away from the offer of the kingdom to Israel and toward the Gentiles, with Paul as the leading apostle for this new phase in God's plan.
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (2 Timothy 2:15)
Identifying the beginnings and endings of the divisions, essential to correct interpretation, requires diligent, God-guided study; much truth lies beneath the surface. Failure to do so guarantees miss-interpretation, which is the fountainhead of false doctrine. “It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter” (Proverbs 25:2).
A complete understanding of the Apostle Paul’s exhortation to “rightly DIVIDE the word of truth” in 2 Tim. 2:15 [emphasis mine] hinges on the comprehension of five interrelated subjects:
1st The difference between God’s dealings with the three people groups listed in 1 Corinthians 10:32.
2rd The Distinctions between the various Dispensations.
3nd The Contrast between Law and Grace.
4th The Mystery of the Body of Christ.
5th Signs and Wonders during the Church Age.
I just subscribed! Found the short watchmen video with shofars blasting! Content looks great! I'll watch this video tonight! Which other videos do you recommend I start with?
@@ShuwshanEmeq-xb3mk thank you so much for following along. I would recommend that you start in all of them, but I do want to make you aware that I have started teaching advanced things concerning the kingdom of God and I will shortly be teaching the gospels of Jesus + the Torah and the prophets. But I have felt led to start where I'm at. But I will be going through the scriptures to encourage you to become a disciple of the Lord yourself personally. Thank you very much
@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 Thanks for responding! I will probably jump around on videos to catch up!
@ShuwshanEmeq-xb3mk please check my playlist as all of my teachings that I do are in successive order and they build upon each other and I have several series that I have started.
Dispensationalism is just Marcionism without the ontological dualism.
thank you for your comment. Please expound further breaking it down for many who might not understand what you are saying. thank you
@@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 More Christians need to study Church History. OK then... Marcion was a second century heretic. Believing he was following St. Paul, he made a clean separation between the religion of the Old Testament and the New. There are other similarities between what he taught and Dispensationalism, but I encourage folk to do their own in depth study. RE "ontological dualism": Marcion differs from Dispensationalists in a major way in one area. He attributed the difference between the OT and the NT to their each being the product of a different God. The OT was from Yahweh, the just God of the Jews. The NT was from ABBA---the Father of Jesus Christ---a God of Mercy and Love. He is usually classed with the gnostics, but that is inaccurate. Gnostics taught salvation by secret knowledge. Marcion taught salvation by faith.
I did. But my extensive comment seems to have gone missing. Your listeners need to study early church history. Then they'll understand.
@@mikewark6408 I am sorry to hear. We did not delete your comment. If your willing repost. I have studied marcion and alot of early church history. I thought it would be nice to hear from another in the family of GOD share their insights concerning this matter for others to read. Thanks for subscribing.
I remembered something I noticed some time ago. In Mathew 24 Jesus says someone will come saying “I am the “Christ””. He could be identifying them by the NAME they use for the resurrected spiritual being. “CHRIST”
@@stevenschmitz8901 yes I agree totally I’ve thought of this many times. It’s interesting that the 12 apostles always call the Messiah Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Kind of like saying I am God without saying I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob . There is a clear distinction
Matthew 28
18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, *_All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth._*
Revelation 13
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: *_and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations._*
Why do these 2 verses line up with each other?
@ not sure your point. The word power is not in rev 13:7, just “it was given”. Jesus had authority in heaven and earth. Beast only given IT, whatever that is, on earth.
If all power is given it means he didn't all way have all power and a different God gave it to him
If all power is given it means he didn't all way have all power and a different God gave it to him
Thank you for listening. You can listen to this video at 1.25 all the way up to 1.75 if you can digest and comprehend at those speeds.
I appreciate your work and look forward to more of your in-depth studies. Question though-wouldn't it be hard to deny that all believers are a part of Israel, even through Paul's writings?
Take Galatians 3:29 (KJV), for example: "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." This clearly connects believers in Christ to Abraham’s lineage and the promises made to him.
Paul also reinforces this idea in Romans 9:6 (KJV): "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel," emphasizing that true Israel is not defined solely by physical descent.
And in Ephesians 2:12-13 (KJV): "That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise... But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ."
Would love to hear your thoughts!
@@blazeroundhouse6595 thank you for your comment. I will circle back and give you a more theological answer but I will give you the best that I can at this moment. I believe that we are dealing with many different views today and in history. There are religious groups that believe that everyone is grafted into the tree or the family of Abraham as he is the father of many nations, but they do not necessarily believe that you are of the line or the branch that is specifically Israel, meaning that you have the same requirements on you that the Israelites had that came before the father at Mount Sinai and that the prophets prophesied to and that Jesus came to to preach to in person. I think there's another group that believes that we are grafted into Israel but yet we are not truly Israelites. We are sojourners or gentiles living amongst the Israelites or what they might would call Jews and therefore the sojourners have a different set of laws and expectations on them then the Jews Then there is a group that regardless of their views as how we are grafted in. They are literally saying God is saving the gentiles with a completely different set of requirements, even separate from the teachings of Jesus and that it's basically only through the teachings of Paul that they are to follow and that at the end of the gentile dispensation that God will then turn and begin to love the Jews or the Israelites again bringing them back into the covenant and this is what I would call the greater adherence to dispensationalism. No matter how we slice it or dice it, the Catholics, the Protestants and any and all other forms of religion today do not obey Moses nor the prophets, nor the words of the Lord Jesus Christ. In total they are either partially removing Jesus or completely removing jesus's ministry and their life and requirements primarily come from Paul. I think potentially some might would come to the conclusion that we are Israel from Paul's writings, however, I believe they would come to a perverted or twisted view of how they fit in with Israel. Meaning they would maybe always see themselves as gentiles or in some new kind of covenant that would make them different than the gospel Peter, James and John instruct and all of the covenant keeping believing Jews or Israelites going back all the way to Abraham. As Paul in Galatians clearly states that we aren't to keep the law of Moses nor the festivals nor the Sabbath nor new moons and other things. And if we do so, we are forfeiting the grace that God has now bestowed upon us through the cross. Remember, Paul becomes all things to all people that he might win some. It is clear to me that his message changes based upon the audience that he is with. I once was listening to a missionary that said that the Muslims have the same kind of ministry based upon the population that they are serving or ministering to, such as in Iran they would preach a very hard Islamic faith. Whereas here in the United States everything is love and joy and peace and they would not bring out the depths of their message because if they did so it would be highly rejected. I believe Paul follows in the same suit. I would appreciate your thoughts as well. This subject at hand and the Kingdom of heaven and all that we are seeking to know and learn from the father is so big and so vast so I myself am continuing to learn
There must be 20 ads here. But I love the video
@@thecure728 I am so sorry for the ads. I have requested that the ads be taken off and I have done the correct settings but I was told by another person that they will not remove the ads until you get to a certain number of subscribers. I will try again. I do not want ads and I do not get paid by them. Freely you have received and freely you must give
This man woke up and chose violence lol
@@conor9109 dear sir, I would appreciate if you would elaborate on your comment. Just a little bit more to help me understand
@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 just a contentious issue to drop live rounds against. People cling to that doctrine as the gospel itself.
@@conor9109 well, when it is a false gospel, only those who love and have the truth are able to lead them out of it
@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 i wish you the best. Never forget the walk of Job
Actually the House of Israel was scattered and sown around the world ...
If you read the Scottish Declaration of Independence from 1320 , it says that the Irish are from the house of Israel. It further states how they came out of Egypt , sinned against YHVH causing their dispertion . They were later called Scythians, and made their way over the caucus mountains to Spain then to Ireland..
Think the inhabitants of Ireland were once called Tuthan De Dannan which translates House of Dan .....
@@murph19611 yes I've read these, many people are descendants of Jacob in their blood but at this point all are highly mixed with the nations. Esau was direct blood from Isaac but was not apart of the house of spiritual Israel, Manasseh and Ephraim were bloodlines of Jacob but were not apart of the House of Israel until Jacob adopted them back in egypt. No one on earth right now are apart of the house of Israel unless they are adopted back in so to speak through Jesus Christ even though they may be direct bloodlines of Jacob whether they be 5% or 100% of his blood ( Jacob. ). According to scripture anyone could be added or cut off from the house of Israel based upon their adherence to the covenant. Jesus came for the nations building up the house of Israel.
@@murph19611 please read hosea ch 1-2 it says how Israel is not my people but then says a new covenant would be offered and then those who were not called my people shall be called my people again. Pre-requisite they must enter the covenant. The house of Cornelius was a family that one of the first to enter this promise. As the covenant made to the beast of the field, the field of the air, and creeping things was reminded of and shown again to Peter which would have reminded him of hosea. From that vision the salvation of and acceptance of Cornelius as one of them became affirmed. Blessings.
@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 my dna is 100 % Irish...I know what the Holy Spirit has taught me ...that said Revelation speaks of 144,000 with 12,000 from every tribe except Dan.... are they mixed , because the bible is very clear ...
Or this ...Genesis 49:16 KJV - Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel.
Paul of Tarsus is a false apostle, the Benjamin wolf in sheeps clothing Jesus warned us about in Rev 2:2. Your video is amazing, thanks.
@@WashYourWorld thank you sir. May God have all the glory. Please consider subscribing. I have many other things that I would love to share and I highly appreciate when people engage and comment and share with me things that they have learned. May you have a blessed Day