@@nltennis2429 notice where that post is located. At the French (and other big events), they can move their larger posts into the correct position for singles/doubles, while this one has the larger posts permanently in the doubles position. That's why the singles sticks are necessary, as well as the rule for "inside/outside" the net post.
The supervisor can help decide a question of rule. They cannot help in a question of judgment. Players know this, and yet they continue to call the supervisor whenever they disagree with a line call just because they are spoiled brats
Anyone agrees that Cuevas played the point albeit lackadaisical because he was waiting for the out call? I never saw him raise his hand nor did he walk away. I think he genuinely thought the ball was out but hit it back casually "just in case". I think the umpire erred and stopped the point too hastily
Hi. It doesn’t matter if the player stops or not, as long as the shot is in the opponent has to keep playing. Just watch Monfils and also Tiafoe shots where they faked that they had lost the point and unexpected they played the point and actually won the point, cheers.
@@mauriciovirmond7272 Hi those trick shots are fine and part of the tennis culture. And it's different from stopping to walk over to a mark during the middle of a rally. For example, watch Sharapovs vs Zakopalova 2012 RG highlights and at 16:33, Sharapova does a similar thing and the umpire leaves her chair to inspect the mark. Because you cannot do that in the middle of a rally as it puts the opponent off.
Finally, after all these years, we finally get a video hhaha. Great stuff, Tennis Advocate and welcome back. I hope you keep on being healthy during these times.
10:02 is one of the worst calls I’ve seen in a while. Cuevas didn’t at all stop the point there. Empire should not have interfered at all. Why can’t empires just learn to keep their mouths shut until the point is over in points like these?
13:47 - a professional tournament, and I can't believe they don't have a roller brush for the lines?? They just use a broom, which is sloppy and uneven. A roller brush keeps the brush on the line the entire time, and the roller makes it easy to push it down along the line from end to end, with an even, consistent cleaning of the tape. This was so rec-league-ish level......
They need to add like point replay monitors to the stand so that umpires can see whether something did or didn't happen (not for in or out). There will be things that refs miss like if a ball was returned in play after a challenge that they for some reason won't just go back and check.
I like how (in the Moutet match, for example) a player will argue about missed calls and other calls, hit the net, throw tantrums and argue with the umpire, but then when the match is over the player forgets it all, shakes the umpire's hand and goes away, like nothing happened
If you look at the "handshake", most times it's a no-look feeble gesture that means nothing. But, it cannot be said that they refused to shake the Ump's hand. Really funny to look at some times.
I swear to God supervisors are the definition of useless in tennis.. Chair umpire doesn't need an advocate, just remove that position. I ve never ever seen a supervisor overruling a chair umpire decision. Just don't make players believe calling him does something, it just delays the game for the viewers.
Ive seen it - with a review. Guy asked for a review, chair heard it, then for some reason chair denied the review. Supervisor called... "you heard him say review? Yes. Then do the review". Only time Ive ever seen it TBH.
wtf man idk how tennis players are getting so used to being able to challenge and complaijt about everything. The umpire can be fucking wrong he is a person. Just accept the decision and keep doing your job you babies
It's clay so they have to check the marks on it so if the lines are not clean sometimes that can affect the ball marks and as a result the call at times, I think his semantics were not the best but the principle was alright because on every changeover they are supposed to clean the lines but when you look at the lines their was clay all over it and that can be an issue in terms of slipping at times that's why at Roland Garros they brush the lines with a huge brush to make sure that doesn't happen
Does anyone else think moutet was just being a cry baby for no reason. The fact that he was complaining about the courts being cleaned, has nothing to do with the fact that he is losing! A clean court should be a good thing not something to complain about. Clearly he was just mad that he was losing. But my gosh, if your going to complain about something find something that matters!!
moutet y forcadell, dos personas que lo que no tienen de edad de experiencia en su profesión, lo tienen en errores xD aunque lo de la pelota de Garin que pego en la red y entró, pero no le dieron el punto, no sé, ese arbitro no se leyó ni la primera página de las reglas del tenis
En la de Garín el cobro es correcto, cuando hay palos de singles sosteniendo la red todo lo que sigue después se considera out, incluyendo los postes. Te dejo la explicación de Damian Steiner sobre el tema ruclips.net/video/ZUWM8U-hhuM/видео.html
Moutet hits the net with his racket agressively five times. In soccer when you do two little things wrong (for example hands and kicking a ball away after referee stopped the game) you get send off. In tennis after something like that you should not get a warning, you should be disqualified immediately.
For me, the point should be For Schwartzman. Pablo hitted the Ball, that’s right. But after that, he was looking the mark still before the umpire says “stop”, so it’s obvious he stopped the point. I don’t understand why do you think the umpire acted Weibo.
10:02 Umpire would be right if Cuevas didn't hit a lob ball and had a closer look at the mark, taking the time to look is a stopping action. good call here, even though everbody found it ambigious
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Missing Everything [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dTYeMZGzOzw/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how Lahyani is almost never wrong and when he is, he admits it right away.
sounds like such a nice guy
In my opinion is the best umpire so far
@@NicoCeleste1 I agree
Idk how you find these clips but well done mate
I swear you deserve 1M subs... no tennis yet you still give us tennis’ angriest moments.
4:14 because the singles sticks are up, any shot that hits outside of that is considered out. I know someone will likely ask, so there you go.
Thank you, I was curious about that one.
I am a tennis umpire and I can confirm. The chair umpire was 100% right
Bruh I coulda sworn the tennis tv ig said the umpire made the wrong call
Then what about the one where Kim Clisters hit the post at the French open?
@@nltennis2429 notice where that post is located. At the French (and other big events), they can move their larger posts into the correct position for singles/doubles, while this one has the larger posts permanently in the doubles position. That's why the singles sticks are necessary, as well as the rule for "inside/outside" the net post.
How tf did moutet come back to win that match wow
it's clay bruh and besides, Pella is so unpredictable.
tedd yea that’s true lol
Goes from 4-0 to 4-5 in the second......
Moutet guy didn’t impress me. He’s obnoxious af
Gamesmanship by Moutet. Very disrespectful. It's a tactic he uses often when he's down in matches.
I don’t even know why players are given the choice to call a supervisor when they always agreed with the umpire
The supervisor can help decide a question of rule. They cannot help in a question of judgment. Players know this, and yet they continue to call the supervisor whenever they disagree with a line call just because they are spoiled brats
Anyone agrees that Cuevas played the point albeit lackadaisical because he was waiting for the out call? I never saw him raise his hand nor did he walk away. I think he genuinely thought the ball was out but hit it back casually "just in case". I think the umpire erred and stopped the point too hastily
The umpire stopped because Cuevas was walking over to the mark to inspect it?
@@user-gu1un7pb7k you may be right, however he made no CLEAR indication of stopping the point. I think the umpire erred. Such is the game I suppose
Yeah Cuevas made it very tough on the umpire but idk why the umpire just stopped it.
Hi. It doesn’t matter if the player stops or not, as long as the shot is in the opponent has to keep playing. Just watch Monfils and also Tiafoe shots where they faked that they had lost the point and unexpected they played the point and actually won the point, cheers.
@@mauriciovirmond7272 Hi those trick shots are fine and part of the tennis culture. And it's different from stopping to walk over to a mark during the middle of a rally. For example, watch Sharapovs vs Zakopalova 2012 RG highlights and at 16:33, Sharapova does a similar thing and the umpire leaves her chair to inspect the mark. Because you cannot do that in the middle of a rally as it puts the opponent off.
you missed diego being salty in the trophy ceremony, blaming lahyani for his loss against garin.
😈😈😈will be Nice to see that
the umpire in the Moutet video was incredibly rude. calling the "staff" lazy.
Finally, after all these years, we finally get a video hhaha. Great stuff, Tennis Advocate and welcome back. I hope you keep on being healthy during these times.
How can 2 tournaments go in such bad directions xd
South America
Oh stfu these nonsense happens everywhere. Have you not seen the 90% rest of the videos in this chanel about hard courts in europe and Asia?
ChoroGil someone’s a little aggressive
Finally new video and now wait for new drama :-)
It's amazing how you collect these clips. You deserve more subscribers.
Best tennis serie on youtube
Where is AD Fokina vs ST Wild? That was a dramatic classic in Rio, everything including the kitchen sink.
10:02 is one of the worst calls I’ve seen in a while. Cuevas didn’t at all stop the point there. Empire should not have interfered at all. Why can’t empires just learn to keep their mouths shut until the point is over in points like these?
I can't be agree with you. If the ball had been out, Cueva had been so happy.
hamaja18 is English not your first language? I don’t understand what you’re trying to say
@@HarryJohnson69 What did you not understand? If the ball had gone out, he would not have complained. Cuevas is a cryer
hamaja18 well obviously he would’ve been happy. That doesn’t mean that the umpire’s decision was correct
@@HarryJohnson69 For me, he stopped the point. But it is only my opinion.
Regards.
Thank you for including the results of the match!
13:47 - a professional tournament, and I can't believe they don't have a roller brush for the lines?? They just use a broom, which is sloppy and uneven. A roller brush keeps the brush on the line the entire time, and the roller makes it easy to push it down along the line from end to end, with an even, consistent cleaning of the tape. This was so rec-league-ish level......
love how you put the scores in this one
A new drama video? YESS
Schwartzman looks like Dominic Thiem, but shorter.
Papa thiem has some explaining to do
It always surprises me that professional tennis players don't actually know the rules when balls hit net posts and stuff like that
They need to add like point replay monitors to the stand so that umpires can see whether something did or didn't happen (not for in or out). There will be things that refs miss like if a ball was returned in play after a challenge that they for some reason won't just go back and check.
I like how (in the Moutet match, for example) a player will argue about missed calls and other calls, hit the net, throw tantrums and argue with the umpire, but then when the match is over the player forgets it all, shakes the umpire's hand and goes away, like nothing happened
If you look at the "handshake", most times it's a no-look feeble gesture that means nothing. But, it cannot be said that they refused to shake the Ump's hand. Really funny to look at some times.
12:30 And in the next point , Schwartzman got injured, and won the match while he could barely move
Love ur vids
Max here again, I’m in the shower on my phone, and I watch right away!!!!!!!! Ty again
The clay in Buenos Aires is such orange, that I can`t look at it.
The Cuevas ones are difficult. Imo it seems he stopped play on both occasions.
I've subbed just for the subtitles 👌
Ive always wondered how clay courts feel like. Is it like sand, is there lots of crushed powder, is it hard???
Just really slippery with most shoes. A bit like a packed sand path for pedestrians - hard surface, slippery if you want to accelerate or decelerate.
14:16 what a horrible job. It looks like Nino is now cleaning tennis courts. Even have video to prove it!
I swear to God supervisors are the definition of useless in tennis.. Chair umpire doesn't need an advocate, just remove that position. I ve never ever seen a supervisor overruling a chair umpire decision. Just don't make players believe calling him does something, it just delays the game for the viewers.
Ive seen it - with a review. Guy asked for a review, chair heard it, then for some reason chair denied the review. Supervisor called... "you heard him say review? Yes. Then do the review". Only time Ive ever seen it TBH.
Yeeees finally, LOVE IT!!
Just mail it to ATP. They can use it for umpire grading courses.
The Aussie commentators call it a "hissy fit" LOL
wtf man idk how tennis players are getting so used to being able to challenge and complaijt about everything. The umpire can be fucking wrong he is a person. Just accept the decision and keep doing your job you babies
People don’t even want to argue with Lahayani because he is so nice.
Shout out to Schwartzman’s clothing sponsor TJ Maxx apparently
Munar says he wants to be like Nadal but he has such a bad attitude that he’ll never ever be like him.
nobody will ever be like Rafael so.....
check out my channel for his academy footage btw
"I bounced it badly" 🤣😂🤣😂. C'mon.
I hope children don't watch these games. It's a sad display of the worst behaviour in sports.
7:24 it's his forefinger mate... to express the fact he only said it once.
I've heard FO will play in September. How could it be? French still hard spread.
Code violation, shirt abuse, warning mister Verdasco
What was up with that umpire having the courts swept on a regular change over? wtf?
And then saying he didn’t want the linespeople to be lazy. That’s just rude
It's clay so they have to check the marks on it so if the lines are not clean sometimes that can affect the ball marks and as a result the call at times, I think his semantics were not the best but the principle was alright because on every changeover they are supposed to clean the lines but when you look at the lines their was clay all over it and that can be an issue in terms of slipping at times that's why at Roland Garros they brush the lines with a huge brush to make sure that doesn't happen
TERRIBLE UMPIRES!!!!
I don't wanna play tannis after watching these unfair sh*t,
So many of these issues could be fixed by electronic line calling. You can't argue with a machine. No need for Hawkeye challenges either.
Lmao " i bounded it badly 3 Time "
Get another strange habits dude
Verdasco without hat > Verdasco with hat
Does anyone else think moutet was just being a cry baby for no reason. The fact that he was complaining about the courts being cleaned, has nothing to do with the fact that he is losing! A clean court should be a good thing not something to complain about. Clearly he was just mad that he was losing. But my gosh, if your going to complain about something find something that matters!!
How can Cuevas say he didn't stop the play? He literally walked over to the mark during the point to see if it was out lmfao
Verdasco has always been a 2nd 3rd rounder player. Except that magic run in 09 AO.
Yes he is a dickhead. Unsportsmanship.
12:05 Kovalik lost the first set in tiebreak
12:26 Kovalik lost the match 2-6 3-6
o_O
They took a game away from him for every time he hit the court.........
14:37
Lmao who made Ricardo Kaka a ref.
You need your eyes checked. He's not even close
Kovalik is psycho, what' the critical in this start of set progress?
Andujar looks so much like Andy Roddick
Vamos Rinolas was like in every one
Moutet is too precious to be a tennis player.
moutet y forcadell, dos personas que lo que no tienen de edad de experiencia en su profesión, lo tienen en errores xD aunque lo de la pelota de Garin que pego en la red y entró, pero no le dieron el punto, no sé, ese arbitro no se leyó ni la primera página de las reglas del tenis
En la de Garín el cobro es correcto, cuando hay palos de singles sosteniendo la red todo lo que sigue después se considera out, incluyendo los postes. Te dejo la explicación de Damian Steiner sobre el tema
ruclips.net/video/ZUWM8U-hhuM/видео.html
cuevas didnt stop
How did Sousa beat kovalik 6-2; 6-3 of the first set score was 7-6
ML Lifestyle yes. I was just about to write it also 😁
Corentin 🤩
Moutet hits the net with his racket agressively five times. In soccer when you do two little things wrong (for example hands and kicking a ball away after referee stopped the game) you get send off. In tennis after something like that you should not get a warning, you should be disqualified immediately.
Lol no tennis matches would be played then haha. At least one player gets angry and does things like that in at least half of the matches
Why Cuevas has tge worst calls??
13:04 final score should have been 7-6(3)/7-6(5)
terrible umpires as usual
ARCILLA ES ANTIGUO,. SEAN MAS MODERNOS CON PISTAS RAPIDAS. Y TV..
12:16
Temper tantrum much dude?
For me, the point should be For Schwartzman. Pablo hitted the Ball, that’s right. But after that, he was looking the mark still before the umpire says “stop”, so it’s obvious he stopped the point. I don’t understand why do you think the umpire acted Weibo.
QUIEN SE CREE EL ATORRANTE...
Tennis has because some buuuuullshiiiit
7:19 Middle Finger
Rastko Manasic I think he might’ve been saying only once and used one finger but maybe not 🤷♂️
Rastko Manasic its not the middle finger, he said only once and pointed one finger up...
That's not his middle finger, if you pause at 7:24, it's his index finger
Are you dumb or blind?
10:02 Umpire would be right if Cuevas didn't hit a lob ball and had a closer look at the mark, taking the time to look is a stopping action. good call here, even though everbody found it ambigious
😮💨
Garin was right
11:56..the female official behind Cuevas (to his left) got injected with Joker venom.
what the heckk?????? the scores are different for kovalik and sousa, bad editing as always
Why is this pinned ;-;
Not a lot of drama