A Comparison of 15 PCI Graphics Cards (DirectX 8, 9, 10, 11)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- 15 graphics cards on the PCI bus, real and simulated, are pitted against each other in this epic comparison! It's the Final Showdown!
Platform specs:
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ @ 2.8GHz
2GB OCZ PC4000 @ 510MHz
ASRock 939Dual-SATA2
Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS
Samsung 830 Series 128GB SSD
Windows XP Professional SP3
Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.5GHz
2GB OCZ PC2-8500 @ 901MHz
Asus P5K-E (Intel P35)
Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS
Samsung 830 Series 128GB SSD
Windows XP Professional SP3
Drivers:
Radeon 9250 - Cat 4.6
Radeon X1300/1550 - Cat 10.2
Radeon HD 2400 Pro/ 3450 - Cat 11.1
Radeon HD 4350/5450 - Cat 12.8
GeForce FX 5500 (both) - FW 71.89
GeForce 6200 - FW 163.71
GeForce 8400GS/9500GT - FW 340.52
GeForce 210 - FW 340.52
GeForce GT 430/520 - FW 340.52
Intro Animation By Ken Gruca Jr - Inquire at kjgruca@gmail.com!
○Join the Pixel Talk Discord server! / discord
○Instagram! / pixelpipes
○Follow me on Twitter! @pixelpipes
○Donate via Paypal: @pixelpipes
I did some number crunching, and totalled the results of each graph. 15 points for first place, 14 points for second, 13 points for third and so on. Any that had 50 points less than the leader were immediately out of the competition. Here are the results:
9500GT: 127
GT520: 127
GT430: 121
210: 113
HD5450: 104
HD4350: 90
8400GS: 86
HD3450: XXX
9250: XXX
X1550: XXX
HD2400: XXX
X1300: XXX
6200: XXX
FX5500128: XXX
FX550064: XXX
So, what're the TL;DR's from these numbers? If you're wanting the best performance bar none, the 9500GT and the GT520 are your go-to's. The GT 430's there if you can't find either of those, with the 210 being a backup for the backup. The HD5450 is the best card for the AMD fans, with the 4350 being their backup.
Footnote: What I find incredible is that the 9500 GT, a card from 2009, has performance comparing to an R5 230, a PCI-E card from April 2014! So, all the way into 2014, you could get graphics better than PCI-E off of PCI!
Haha love the analysis! Thanks!
@GRUMPY OLD BASTARD Well, at least the name of your channel matches the attitude you have.
@His Masters Voice There are actually a lot of groups that this video targets
1: Hardware Enthusiasts
2: Retro Gamers
3: People looking to upgrade older systems only equipped with PCI slots (me)
Just because this video isn't suited to you doesn't automatically make it a bad video.
I have the Galaxy PCIe variant of the 9500GT. That card did what ever I needed it to do, and went into a glorious retirement when it revealed its limits when running The Sims 3, as did the rest of the system (AMD Athlon 64 X2 and 4 gigs of DDR2 800 clock memory).
Thank you so much. You've just saved me so much time.
One ISA-only motherboard owner disliked this video.
you mean 3 owners of only PCI-E slots dislikes this video :D
@@intel386DX he means 5 owners of AGP slot only disliked this video :-D
@@Pidalin hehe it is not postible for the mothearbord with AGP to not have a regular PCIs :) :D
@@intel386DX ok Sherlock :-D
@@Pidalin elementary Watson :D
This is a video I can see being incredibly helpful in a topic that many of us have looked into but can't quite find a solid consensus on all of the cards.
I'm really surprised by some of that 9500GT, the Performance, and the rarity of it are really something special for PCI.
Brilliant Video.
wow!! tremendous work, what we saw in two minutes of graphics must have taken many days of testing
Yes. Yes it did. Glad you liked it!
He actually did it the absolute madman
Thanks for the massive amount of testing and time invested in this project!
Interesting Comparison! I missed the matrox PCI cards and a view towards retro-compatibility like "8Bit palletized textures", working win9x drivers....
Such a testing rig would also be interesting for "agp-lowprofile" and "PCIe Lowprofile".
Nice find on the 9500 GT, I had a friend that begged me to help him find one for his family computer so he could upgrade over the the geforce 6200 we put in there a few years before. I learned a lot about PCI graphics back then and it's nice to see a refresher so many years later.
6200 is a nerfed 6600gt die and could often be flashed back to 6600gt unlocking the extra pipes and faster clocks. That would be interesting to see as a future PCI contender!
Haven't seen the video for the moment but I give you my thumb up ! Keep up dude as always ;)
Is the music in the beginning "Drizzle (Firelight Smoove Mix)"?
Good old age of empires II :-)
Love revisiting old graphics cards, somehow it's just a bit more interesting than current times when it was the wild west of graphics engines and hardware support. I want to try and find an old Dell Dimension tower for a retro P4 build, or somehow build my old college computer with an XP 2600+ and Radeon 9700 XT... many good memories overclocking and maxing out that system!
Keep it up, really enjoy your videos!
Nice video! I also enjoyed the Age of empires background music! Keep up the good content!
Crazy to see that the X1300 on a C2D has about the same performance, according to 3DMark2001SE, as my GF4 Ti on a first generation P4 had at the time.
Awesome job. I recently picked up a old Packard Bell matching desktop P3 and it only has pci so I've been struggling with picking and finding a card for it. This helps a bunch.
Great work man! Some of these results I absolutely would not have expected. Also shows just how important drivers can be.
The driver story with PCI cards is SUUUPER sketchy. It made for some difficult moments.
Thanks for this great benchmark series, I was really curious about them.
It would have been even better with some comparison with the same PCI-Express or AGP cards to see what kind of bottleneck PCI gives.
I didn't know they were making GPUs for old PCI so long time, when I had motherboard with PCI only I would really appreciate that. The best what I found was some S3 with 8 MB VRAM. It was cca in 2004. But it could run AvP 1 on low. :-D 3300 points in 3D Mark 2005 with PCI GPU, that's crazy! Why was that so rare when it has obviously some performance? It would be perfect for office PCs without AGP or PCI-e in that time.
ps: "geforce 95 hundred" without text help I wouldn't know how much is that, English can be very weird :-D
That age of empires 2 soundtrack is just PERFECT for this video! Big thumps up from me!!! :)
This is what you have been working on. I can't wait till pixel box ep 9!
Love your vids man, glad you're back!
Thank you for waiting patiently!
@@PixelPipes cheers mate
This interests me probably more than it should because I've had a bunch of Radeon and pre Radeon cards over the years. 3D Rage II +, Rage 128 Pro, Radeon VE, Radeon X300, Radeon X600, Radeon X1300 Pro Radeon HD 2400 PRO, Radeon HD4670, Radeon HD5670, Radeon HD6670. The more mainstream ones that I've had are Radeon 32MB SDR, Radeon 8500, Radeon 9100, Radeon 9600 Pro Radeon 9800 PRO/XT, Radeon HD3870x2, Radeon RX 550, Radeon RX 570. Most of mine were AGP or PCIe though. I had only a handful of PCI ones and they were 3dFx and nVidia.
Some cards I'am watching first time in PCI version. Nice collection. Reason why I have almost nothing = all PCI cards sitting in AUS :-D
I would take some of your rare cards over any of my PCI cards!
Haha I know :-)
The 9500GT has no windows 98 drivers witch makes it a bit useless for lost of retro builds. The 9250 on the other hand has excelent win9x drivers.
Can you run some HL2 with PIII-S 1.4Ghz with these cards?
I do not own such a CPU, sorry
I keep it glued to this channel. But sadly, after 6 years, we still didn’t get another pci gpu video. Even though it was announced. GeForce 4mx pci and TNT ultra pci would be interesting to see! Also maybe pci to pcie adapters, if they exist.
Well done. I think I've watched this video four times already. Some of those cards are really expensive. You're effort is greatly appreciated.
Good job ! thanks for spending the time and money on this.
I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Solid video as usual--thanks!
This was a very interesting video. Strange to see such massive variation. And as for Far Cry, that just makes absolutely no sense, completely confusing.
I wonder if using a PCI to PCIe Adapter Card (combined with a PCIe x1 Cable Adapter which are equipped with a Berg Connector for extra power) would produce better results than the "native" PCI GPUs? Recently picked up a Sparkle 9500 GT PCI card, and a $60 GT 610 PCI card with 1GB still on eBay. Awesome Videos!
I've had suggestions over the years to try one of those adapters, but I haven't had much personal interest in it
Fantastic video!
Got a free Radeon 7000 from someone and was excited to put it in an old PC... only to find that this PC on has PCI slots and no AGP slots. This is helping me land on the FX5500 for this old XP machine and see how it goes.
Great work, dude. Love these videos. :)
Thanks!
PixelPipes! Where you at? Hopefully working on that Windows 98SE/PCI GPU gaming build lol.
I didn't go anywhere! I just can't give as much time as I would like to my channel. I apologize to my viewers for that.
@@PixelPipes You don't have to apologize man, just pulling your leg. Got a hankering for some classic GPU info videos and I burned through all of yours too fast lol.
I have the geforce 6200 bought 3 months ago! Nice to see how it stacks up to the others.
Its a bloody minefield trying to find a pci card thats not a bloody express slot!! Grrrr! Too many listings incorrectly stating wrong connector listing as a pci and not as a pcie or pci-express!!
Nice test. Tho, for practical reason, if someone wants PCI ard I would recommend those which are older and do not use any bridge (like PLX) to operate, aka native AGP chips (which is natively backwards compatible with PCI). I have seen many of those cards with bridges work bad on older chipsets. Another thing is windows 98 support. Getting a PCI card with no win98 is eh... questionable.
The bad thing about the modern DX10+ ones is that they are only good for 2D desktop extension, some may argue some gaming, but the bandwidth of PCI is so low you cannot even play videos on them HD videos desync or run slow or stop playing. PCI is a huge bottleneck, when it died off I would say it was the right time. Even the latest PCI cards which back in the day showed little to none bottleneck (like Vooodoo5) later became bottlenecked as faster CPUs arrived. Even voodoo5 has massively improved min fps in a bit more modern engines (like UT2004) if ran in PCI-X slot where it can run on 66mhz vs 33mhz of standard PCI. And this was the least bottlenecked card as it natively only runs as PCI66 in AGP and does not utilize any AGP features. On the other cards the impact is much worse.
Well it will nuke you minimal framerates.
great vid, thanks a lot.
Thanks for this nice professional review!
Thank YOU for watching it!
Cool video. The last PCI card I used was a Voodoo II 3DFX with an Onboard SiS6326? 8MB Video on a Pentium III 500Mhz system in 1999. I can't remember the brand of the motherboard but it had a SiS chipset with integrated graphics and Cmedia Audio, I had to purchased a SB Audio PCI card as the integrated Audio did not support my Sidewinder Pro FF Joystick. It was a beast at the time. spent a lot time at Novaworld playing F16, Mig29 and F22 III via 33/56K Dialup.. thanks for the memories man..
Seems weird there are GF 8xxx and above cards on PCI but not AGP.
Love the ages of empires music in the background 😅
Holy shit, that OG CRT monitor brings back memories!
Back when 1024x768 was an impressive resolution... *LMFAO*
Interesting and revealing comparison! Due to your talk about the compatibility of new drivers with older games, which degrade performance on newer video cards, you could have used older drivers for some of the video cards tested.
Like the 45.23 for the fx5500 and the 7.11 for the x1300/x1550/HD2400
Was wondering if you had abandoned the PCI GPU prospect. Glad to see you haven't!
I had SO many obstacles but I'm glad I could finish it. Thank you!
@@PixelPipes I'm sure it was a time consuming project. Hell, I'm dreading having to go through all of them to see which ones support Windows 98SE lol. I'd like to see the limits on Windows 98SE, restricted to the PCI bus, for say, a system that couldn't make the XP jump.
@@AtariBorn The GeForce 6200 may be your best option but I haven't fully investigated these cards in 98
@@PixelPipes Thanks for the shortcut. I'm sure I'll look into each one, before it's over as I'm sure they all have their own little nuances. At least I have an idea of what to keep an eye out for. Keep up the great content!
As a huge bonus GT520 can decode up to 4K h264 video.
great video!!! didn t xpect that the pci slot has that performance left in it
Nice video - Nice collection of cards.
i know its been several years and i know it would be a pain to go back and do this all over again, but it would have been interesting to see overclocked results, assuming there was enough power provided by the pci slot to even get any sort of overclocks on these cards.
really helpful. Thanks!
What about Matrox Parhelia on PCI-X and the last Voodoo 5500 card?
Nice, now I'll have an actual direction for what to buy for my trusty ol' 98 machine to get it off of the (reasonably capable) SiS integrated graphics.
I really enjoyed especially the 9250 passing through from the bottom to the top.
Can you test all the fastest AGP cards as well?
--
Would also like to see a test system with the fastest, first quad core CPU you can find along with cheap modern / older but still-with-driver support PCI express cards you can find?
late AGP cards are nonsense because there war CPU bottleneck, if you have Pentium 4 or something like that (TOP cpu in AGP times) then 2007 GPUs are already bottlenecked.
Okay. I've done my research, watched your videos, and since you seem especially knowledgeable on the subject I could really use some stellar advice, if you don't mind. :)
I have an old Dell Dimension B110 that was basically a donation that I am upgrading to maximum specs as far as I can take it as an interesting hobby. I realize that upgrading it isn't the most financially-sensible venture in the long run, but anyone who tells me "You'd be better off buying a new computer" is missing the point. I already know that. ;)
Long story short, the only major thing left that I need in this thing is a good graphics card. Seeing as how the B110 comes with only PCI slots and no AGT slots, and seeing as how I only have one PCI slot left I want to make sure that I get the best graphics card that this computer can handle.
I realize that I'm not going to get away with playing modern-day resource-intensive games, but I'm mostly a retro-emulator kind of person and FPSs have never really interested me anyway. ;) I just want something that could be a viable replacement for the Intel Extreme Graphics driver that's native to the motherboard.
So my two choices, after much research, have come down to the ZOTAC ZT-40605-10L GeForce GT 430 and also the SPARKLE SP95GT1024D2LHP GeForce 9500 GT. Looking at the specs of both cards, I'm quite frankly torn, because there are so many advantages and disadvantages to each one.
The GT430 appears to have much better specs... 96 cores as opposed to the 9500GTs 32, Direct X11 as opposed to Direct X10, Open GL 4.1 as opposed to Open GL 2.1, and less power consumption requirements (Which I am prepared and willing to compensate for one way or the other). However, the 9500GT I'm looking at has two major things going for it that the GT430 doesn't... memory size and memory bandwidth. 1GB of memory as opposed to the GT430s 512 and 128-bit memory bandwidth as opposed to 64-bit. You say that the GT430, in a different video, is one of the fastest PCI cards made, but your video shows the 9500GT clearly outperforming it in most applications. And according to those who populate this forum ( www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=58022&start=21 ) getting the "fastest" PCI card may not be the best idea since a lot of the GT430s superior features and performance would be held back by its memory bandwidth restrictions as opposed to the 9500GT. Your video also seems to support this.
Features are nice, but at the end of the day I am looking for the absolute best performer that I can get through the lowly PCI slot. ;) Power requirements are either not an issue or one I am ready and prepared to address. I am also working with 2GB of onboard memory and a Pentium 4 3.4Ghz SL793 Northwood CPU, so I'm plenty covered there. :)
So my question: Which, in your professional and personal opinion, would be the better card to pull the trigger on? I really need a consultation here, which I thank you for in advance. At $147 a pop I want to make sure I get this right the first time. ;) Also, thank you for posting your videos, they have been very informative. Take care.
EDIT: Lest you wonder... ;)
www.vgastore.com/1006051/zotac-zt_40605_10l-geforce-gt-430-fermi-512mb-64-bit-ddr3-pci-hdcp-ready-video-card?gclid=eaiaiqobchmi1jpgkk7h4aivdo3ich1lbgtweakyasabegjf6fd_bwe
www.vgastore.com/2016349/sparkle-sp95gt1024d2lhp-geforce-9500-gt-1gb-128-bit-ddr2-pci-hdcp-ready-low-profile-ready-video-card?gclid=eaiaiqobchmi06-yuzf04aivriagch1xwqfveaqybsabegkfevd_bwe
EDIT 2: Running Windows XP Professional SP3 on this machine. Would certainly love the ability to run Windows 7 also, but if I can't it isn't a major dealbreaker. ;)
The 9500GT is marginally faster overall. The limited memory bandwidth holds the GT 430 back too much. Even the GT 520/610 can be faster sometimes because the memory is clocked a little higher.
Just finally after years built my old DOS/98 system took forever to find the parts. Socket 478 pentium 4 2.6 ghz, 512 MB ram and an ATI 7000 64 mb AGP and intel board with the 865pe chipset. with a dual boot of winXP to get use out of a WinTV capture card.
One if not the most watched video on RUclips for me
GREAT VIDEO!
My first card was a GeForce 6200 PCI from BFG. Put it in my families Dell to play Quake 4 (lol). Card was just enough to game on low circa 2006-07. 128MB and overclocked!
Thank you for showing me what I can do with my old computer.
Age of Empires 2 Music! Shamburger!
Great video. Saved a Dell Dimension 2400 from landfill. I'll let rhe new owner know what pci cards are available.
Enjoyed this, should do again with year of release for period correct enthusiasts. My interest atm is the 2001 ATI Radeon 9250 and co.
Why did they continue making PCI video cards but not AGP cards?
RUclips for real... an ad at the beginning and one 27 seconds into the video... great start youtube... you are realling pushing the premium platform...
What would be a good pci card for a pentium II 266 and a pentium 266 mmx system? Both are max ram .
So I bought one of the no name FX 5500 cards you showed and it wouldn't work in one pc. So I bought a BGF 5500 and it worked perfectly. Well I liked the cooler on the no name better so I went to swap them and guess what I found? The no name FX 5500 is actually a 5200 chip. I'm curious if it even actually has 256MB of ram or not since the 5200 was supposed to support 128.
Makes sense as the core clock on mine was 250MHz, same as the 5200. A 5500 would be clocked at 270MHz
Please do the same for VLB, ISA-16 and ISA-8. Your vintage viewers will love you!
Dude it’s ok to show me donuts once, twice, .... but where is the footage from the benchmarks?
Hey man nice test, but best usage for these card is pure DOS or Win98 (i know that some of them will not work in Win98 not drivers after G7/X850, in DOS all of them will work) but still, except you are stuck with some low profile O.E.M HP / DELL etc machine, you have PCI-E or AGP slot on them. Dos benchmark exist (for Quake, Doom etc..) would be particularly interesting with comparison of good old typical DOS cards Ati mach64/S3 Trio/Virge / Tridents, Rage 128 etc.. because lots of these new cards have dynamic clock rate which is driven by drivers and there are starting at pretty low clocks, because of power / noise nationalizations for DOS performance is not so good as someone would expect.
Your machines are completely fine for DOS, we were able to make it working with much newer machine like X58 chipset (newest one with working sound cards, details here: www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=61044, great DOS6.22or7.1/Win98SE/Win2k/WinXP/Win7/Win10 machine, here is similar project video ruclips.net/video/oT47y_EaGHs/видео.html). Funny is that X58 machine with Six core CPU is max 10% slower that my Z8700k, for min framerate is even better.. BTW Windows 98 are running fine even on my X99 /Z170, if you are fiddling with them enough. If you would need help with how to make DOS working come to Vogons we will help you.. I would be shame not test at least few such benchmarks with such collection..
The graphs would be much more interesting if you included a non pci comparison like the hd3850agp or the 6800gtagp to understand how good or bad results are
I would be really interested to see how they perform (if they are even supported) by Windows 98se... that era of PC was far more likely to not have AGP/PCIe
The one card that i love out of the bunch are the 9500gt.I have a pci-e version of the card which i oc'd to match my 9800gt card.Really solid overclocker :D
What the heck man?
Donuts? AoE music? Are you trying to play dirty tricks on our minds?
Wow great pci video
Clicked for pci benchmarks, stayed for Age of Empires 2 music
Oh yeah, we call that Tom's Hardware.
thanks, it is way to hard to find stuff about pci cards. i need something for my 1ghz celeron pc i got for $10
Good old stuffs, I still can remember ma mighty X800XT. 😂😂😄
So out of these cards only 6200 and 9250 (and older) are supported by Win98, right?
It's funny how in 2023 it's easier and cheaper to get an ISA card rather than a decent PCI one. O tempora, o mores!
I'm going to assume a GeForce 8600 would be slightly faster than the GeForce 8400 GS used in this video, just add roughly 5 FPS or so is my guess
Ok now it's time to present: 15 weirdest like DisplayLInk on USB or external GPU via ExpressCard or even Matrox Display Extenders via LAN? Thunderbolt enabled.. USB to PCIE adapters are used for mining are those USB3 links playable?
Don't know, I never messed with any of that stuff you mentioned.
I have a ATI 2400HD in AVG slot configuration. Worked good for what little it was used.
before you say buy a some pci card there are nvidia 5200 that wants windows 7 ( should only need windows 98) which made the card really useless -the matter might be with all later cards
It’s positive feedback only :) you should work a bit on your voice quality. In this initial presenter view your voice is distant, a bit quiter and it lacks of highs and then suddenly you do some nice closeup on those cards with crisp and rich voice. It gives this video a bit of cheap feeling :/
I have a 9500GT in a basement box. Quite possibly the best bang for the buck GPU I'd ever purchased.
Wow, surprised at the amount of pedestrian cards , I always tried to get 75% cards .
NICE AOE background music
How do you find these?
What do you think about making 'Retro PhysX acceleration test'? I mean Physx acceleration by PCI cards, and maybe for comparison PCI-E x1 cards, of course while accompanied by AGP graphics card like Radeon HD3850 (I saw that you have Sapphire, unfortunately not HIS IceQ 3 Turbo.) Hmm ASUS A8V-X / A8V-MX
I'm not planning a PhysX video unless a card falls on my lap.
@@PixelPipes Sorry, that I wasn't precise. I was asking about comparison of PhysX acceleration done by PCI graphics cards set as dedicated PhysX cards. ( 9500GT vs GT430 vs GT520 ) In my opinion it's also interesting how much bandwidth between accelerator and CPU is needed- that's why I mentioned PCI-E x1. You did great comparison between PCI, PCI-E x1 and PCI-E x16 GT520. I think that it would be also interesting to see comparison between PCI-E x1 and PCI-E x16 for fast graphics card set as dedicated PhysX card.
As far as I know, there was close to no difference between Ageia PhysX cards no matter which version- interface, and PPU clock. There is also probably only less than 20 game titles which can use it. I really like an idea of PPU which can calculate whole library of physics, like Ageia PhysX 100, and hate an idea of dividing it between GPU and CPU. I don't know if mixing good ideas and bad ideas in one comparison is the right thing to do. It's like comparing good idea of hardware accelerated simulated audio environment of A3D 2.0/ 3.0 (I saw that you have Aureal Vortex 2.) to any more modern parametric model (doesn't matter if hardware or software accelerated)- the first suitable thing to compare seems to be TrueAudio Next. History shows that good ideas and companies behind them are fated in one particular way.
Back in 2003 I feel In love with call of duty and far cry! PCI based graphics card would perform terribly! Studders and refusal to run! So I bought the most expensive card I could find! Ati 9800 pro agp! Answer to all problems!
Which one is better? The Zotac Geforce GT 610 PCI 512MB or the Jaton Geforce 9500GT PCI 1GB?
NO WAY I HAVE A FX 5500 thats funny that this got recommended to me
What if you used a more modern video card using a pcie to pci adapter?
I like old hardware revisited
We have the same CRT !! Awesome
Nice Collection...
So wonderful!!!!!!!!!!!
I have a GT520 in my P4 NAS. I should think about selling either that or my PCI 9400GT 1GB.
I purchased that Zotac 430 a long time ago to use in a mini ITX computer which had the Intel DG41 mainboard. And I could not get it to work right, it seemed like it was painfully slow, like it didn't have proper drivers or something. And I got black screens with any game launch, so either it was incompatible or bad. In my 200MMX machine with an Asus tx97 I currently use one of those 5500FX 128 bit cards as anything newer will not work on this board, and at that certain revisions wont work either. I had hoped it would have shown better performance in this roundup though :(