There are several dead giveaways that this is fake. Here’s a few. And to get it out the way I am an aviation expert. First: the ailerons and spoilers are going the wrong way for the roll motions that you see. Second: the wings could not bend down at that angle without snapping. Third: the Airbus A320 and all FBW Airbus aircraft have a roll limiter that prevents rolls beyond about 67 degrees (according to an Airbus pilot in the comments). Fourth: the aircraft is not moving fast enough to stay airborne at those extreme angles and in general is moving to slow. Fifth: Airliners can roll but not that fast and certainly not in landing configuration. Sixth: No pilot that wasn’t trying kill everyone would even attempt an approach that is so unstable. Seventh: nobody would actually stand there and film such an event. I’m done.
You pay for what you get. WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU EXPECT FROM A COMPANY THAT CHARGES YOU €10?? HUH? I WONDER WHERE YOU'RE FROM, PROBABLY WHERE RYANAIR DOESN'T OPERATE AND JUST EXPECT RYANAIR TO DO MAD SHIT LIKE THIS BECAUSE YOU HEARD IT FROM SWISS001.
Sorry but it's not a fUcking woosh dO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND ITS NOT A FUCKING *WOOSH DO YOU EVEN* KNOW WHAT IT FUCKING MEANS? NO YOU FUCKING DONT r/ihavereddit
I'm not an aviation expert, but the fact that the smoke/exhaust coming out of the engines just hangs in the air, to me suggests that there is no extreme crosswind.
I know very little about avionics or the physics of air-flight. However, the fact that there has been no news report containing this footage tells you all you need to know about its validity. Not a single tweet from a passenger, ground-crew, independent witness... It's a really good fake, to my untrained eye, but not passing the 'sniff-test.' What little I do know about flying is that at landing speed, such a dramatic roll would drop the plane like a stone, given the sudden loss of lift.
I agree, I couldnt find any other source or news article about this. A 707 has been recorded doing a barrel roll back in 1955. a 707 is 6 feet shorter than a 767 and this is suppose to be a 737 supposedly. Interesting if it did happen to know what happened to the people.
'A barrel roll'. If accurately reported, a barrel roll is not what you, or most people imagine. Which is simply rolling around while maintaining its' course on a flat axis. No, a barrel roll is a plane going forward and maintaining a constant bank and upward pick to one direction, such that it makes loops again and again around an invisible 'column' of forward airspace. It's like using a paint brush to paint a coil around the inside of a barrel. This requires significant altitude, and most likely if it was done in '55 this is how it was done, because simply pulling the maneuver with such a heavy, sluggish plane means you're definitely losing altitude in the process.
Actually, airplane wings are designed to bend If they do not bend, they'll just break apart and fall outta the sky dead. I'm not saying the vid's real, just saying...
I can tell you there are no "Jetz" airliner companies here in Canada. Whoever made this is obviously a very talented CGI artist! Wow! Very realistic looking indeed.
If this is real, then it is absolutely amazing! Check out the flex on those wings. That pilot has some serious skills, but thank goodness the bird was built well, or one of those wings would have snapped off and this would have been a tragedy. That pilot though...wow. If it's a fake, then well done. That's some Hollywood level editing.
It is real--the deflection of all control surfaces isas it would be, and the flex in the wing can not be faked by a NONE pilot CGI geek. He'dhave no idea. this plane is designed to do a chandell with ease or in a strong wind shear either way. He had full power 7 seconds before roll thats why they lived--they were "going around" long before the shear hit them. None pilots don't have a f'ing clue. A 747 will roll, spin fly upside down. This A-319 is much smaller. Built in safety features can NOT over power nature. It's an airplane, not a f'ing magic alien space craft. He came about 11 feet from hitting the ground--because full power had kicked it by then- lucky,! not magic, not fake.
Pretty nice fake, but some rendering issues: 1. Visible sampling noise in motion blur (freeze frame near the end of the clip). Flares don't blur at all. 2. Chromatic ghost in lower left has a single-frame movement discontinuity around 0:16 + 1s. Doesn't respond appropriately when camera pans up. 3. Atmospheric distortion artifact around control tower when smoke reaches it (0:13 + 1s). Too much atmospheric distortion for the conditions, anyway. 4. Chain link fence defocus blur is too soft/opaque--probably composited in a gamma-corrected color space.
@@Silent-ji6bc it says in a new fake story. So I guess I’m wrong then silly me! People do not usually read the description first before they comment on that.
Despite other comments this is totally plausible according to physics. The ailerons oscillate proportionally with the pilot corrections because like in a floating boat, the correction speed depends on velocity and inertia so the viewer will perceive an opposite motion. Because of the gyroscopic effect and stress, the wings bend accordingly and because of the approaching angle, the viewer can't correctly perceive the approaching speed making the plane seem impossibly airborne when it should be stalling.
It's also plausible that the CGI company who posted this video (MeniThings) happened to have a cameraman hanging around an airport when this happened......but somehow I doubt it. Here'a a link to a trailer for some of their other work ruclips.net/video/FY3ZCZ1Ojr0/видео.html
How is it fake there are several airports that have huge crosswinds off and on during the year . test pilots have barrell rolled 707 , 737 , military planes many times . if you watch the flaps on the wings it is a indication it is not faked.
backyardbuilttrucks1 you have to be trolling. There are several dead giveaways that this is fake. Here’s a few. And to get it out the way I am an aviation expert. First: the ailerons and spoilers are going the wrong way for the roll motions that you see. Second: the wings could not bend down at that angle without snapping. Third: the Airbus A320 and all FBW Airbus aircraft have a roll limiter that prevents rolls beyond about 45 degrees. Fourth: the aircraft is not moving fast enough to stay airborne at those extreme angles and in general is moving to slow. Fifth: Airliners can roll but not that fast and certainly not in landing configuration. Sixth: No pilot that wasn’t trying kill everyone would even attempt an approach that is so unstable. Seventh: nobody would actually stand there and film such an event. I’m done.
There are so many "experts" in this thread. It would be nice to see them say what kind of expert exactly they are and where that expertise comes from. To your dead giveaways: 1. You make it look like the pilot could only have done this on purpose. What about a plane that is "out of control"? 2. Sure, no pilot would try such an approach but is it possible that the pilot didn't know a near-surface gush would hit his plane in that exact moment? Plus, at 0:04-0:05 it looks like he's breaking off his attempt. 3. The real altitude of that plane should be much higher than it looks. The blurred fence indicates magnification. I'm not saying it's not a fake. But I wouldn't call it a fake just yet.
雷特 6 years USAF, A&P certified mechanic, have been working at Lockheed Martin since 2011, lifelong self study of aircraft and aerodynamics. Good enough?
I don't know. You tell me. Lockheed hasn't been producing any comparable aircraft since 1984. Do you have any experience with investigating flight incidents involving abnormal wind conditions? Are you familiar with the wing flex of modern civil aircraft? The wing tip of a Boeing 777 for instance is designed to flex up to 25 feet. An A319 is a fairly modern aircraft. You can't compare that to a Hercules. And again... the way you put it was that the pilot in the video is supposed to have done the roll one purpose. That doesn't make any sense of course. It is obvious that the roll is not done on purpose. Even if it is computer-generated, it is not designed to look like a voluntary action. Can you at least try to look at it from that angle?
Common tell is the perspective, and the edit. The perspective is imposed, via the fence (on it's own layer with a blur for distance), there is another plane wing on the left on another layer, giving the impression if the viewer is 5.5 ft tall, the fence is 10 ft.... with all that the plane doesn't scale correctly, nor to the birds flying by indicate abnormal wind conditions, nor does the mic suggest there's enough wind to cause this plane to barrel roll against it's ailerons.
LOL, Impossible at any altitude or wind. A heavy commercial Jet Liner can not perform those kind of maneuvers especially this close to the ground and going that slow. But nicely Photo chopped by Russian Hackers. :-)
Most likely from a flight simulator game. Fence resolution is poor. Lighting from sunset on left and reflection on cockpit windows facing right and sharpness of video camera focus on the plane are all too good as to be using a high end camera that can probably do HDR. If fence resolution was good then this could be CGI, but it is not.
I saw this animation in another video and it was so crazy, I had to look it up. This is a seriously good video though, it fooled me until I read the description.
Ho Lee Shyt & Wat Wentwong were piloting this Chinese Airlines Dreamliner when all hell broke loose. It was the greatest Save in Avionics history. Even greater than the Miracle on the Hudson, piloted by America's famed Sully Sullenberger...No Animals or Humans were harmed in filming of this video.....WORD !!!
"The male 737 airliner performs acrobatic stunts in order to attract a female mate of it's species...".
megadoomerr it was an a320
imm deceased
Hahahahaha
megadoomerr 😂😂
Why isn't your comment pinned
yall the description literally says it's an animation. please read everything
I know. They said it was a CGI right in the description. Many don't read.
Underrated comment
Lol total didn't but read your comment then did it did seem a little over the top and that guy wouldn't be that calm unless he has balls of steel
Damn chill out
It was added later
There are several dead giveaways that this is fake. Here’s a few. And to get it out the way I am an aviation expert.
First: the ailerons and spoilers are going the wrong way for the roll motions that you see. Second: the wings could not bend down at that angle without snapping. Third: the Airbus A320 and all FBW Airbus aircraft have a roll limiter that prevents rolls beyond about 67 degrees (according to an Airbus pilot in the comments). Fourth: the aircraft is not moving fast enough to stay airborne at those extreme angles and in general is moving to slow. Fifth: Airliners can roll but not that fast and certainly not in landing configuration. Sixth: No pilot that wasn’t trying kill everyone would even attempt an approach that is so unstable. Seventh: nobody would actually stand there and film such an event. I’m done.
*clap*
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
😂😂😂😂😂 Just FACTS!
Like a boss! 👍👍
superskullmaster God Bless you sir. The exact response I was looking for. Haha 👍🏼
That's a seriously impressive animation, fooled me the first time watching
How the fuck did you think THAT is real??
@@Enceladus2106 physically its possible on heavy wind shear.
@@norbert.kiszka no
@@Enceladus2106 Not at that airspeed but I'm sure you're familiar with Tex Johnson?
@@ArgueNaught Are you kidding mate
The control surfaces and wing flex *really* add some authenticity here. Nicely done!
Certainly! LOL
Denzel be drinking again 🤦🏽♂️
Axil GET JOHN GOODMAN AND THE COCAINE.
Axil 🤣🤣🤪
Hahahah!
FACTS!
Lmfaoo
Normal ryanair flight dont worry folks.
They would charge you for the added fear
You pay for what you get. WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU EXPECT FROM A COMPANY THAT CHARGES YOU €10?? HUH? I WONDER WHERE YOU'RE FROM, PROBABLY WHERE RYANAIR DOESN'T OPERATE AND JUST EXPECT RYANAIR TO DO MAD SHIT LIKE THIS BECAUSE YOU HEARD IT FROM SWISS001.
Banana Man 101 woooosh
Sorry but it's not a fUcking woosh dO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND ITS NOT A
FUCKING *WOOSH DO YOU EVEN* KNOW WHAT IT FUCKING MEANS? NO YOU FUCKING DONT r/ihavereddit
Banana Man 101 mate you didn’t get the joke calm down
Me risking my whole mission in gta
Me playing FSX:
@@Waddle_Dee_With_Internet me playing X-Plane:
LMAO
Ryanair : You're hired as our chief instructor pilot.
Definitely
@@Spencer09YT but it’s fake
@@SR-71_Blackbird-3.2 Ik it's fake
@@Spencer09YT Ur mom is fake 🤣
Damn...the G-Forces alone would rip that plane apart. Let alone incapacitate everyone onboard.
I know it’s fake but damn.
plus, STALL
I was tbe pilot of this plane and wanted to pick up my mobile phone that fell out my pocket and couldnt be botherd to reach over and pick it up.
LMAO UNDERATED
But airbuses have side sticks
Qantasavation 2 r/woosh
@@cloudhazard2860 oh yeah i get it 😂
Lmao
Amazon prime 1 day shipping be like:
Yeah. Look VERY carefully. They Deliver Via the New PES. Package Ejection System.
Someone hire this guy for his CGI. Much better than what's in movies these days.
It’s well done, but I’m not sure I’d go quite that far.
Ummm, no its not
Ahh, the lost art of sarcastic understanding...
You are also full of shit!
That's because it's real--it happened to me on approach to YBW Alberta in a twin Piper Seminole.
Co Pilot: You know what's awesome? If you type "do a barrel roll" in Google search the screen will do a barrel roll.
Pilot: Hold my beer. XD
I thought this was a "made you do it" prank and tried it. It really worked! also easter egg for "askew"
Thank you very much, i just know
If you go full screen on a vid the type in awesome, something will happen...
@@antagonisingbison287 what is vid? i typed awesome in youtube, nothing happened
Naro Harn When you are watching a video, go full screen and then type in awesome without leaving fullscreen (you don’t type in the search box)
“If you look out the window to your right it is now to your left”. Was on another video and I just had to share it here lol
LMFAO
I'm not an aviation expert, but the fact that the smoke/exhaust coming out of the engines just hangs in the air, to me suggests that there is no extreme crosswind.
Only literal proof I have found. Thanks dude.
That, and if you read the description of the video it says it's fake
@@djp2358 maybe that is not the original video, who knows?
@@toz_dumann BOI
@Drizzt Do'Urden It certainly was a viral success, at the least.
When real life physics is worse than video game physics:
IT's fAkE.
Yea, it's a fake simulation. It looks like CG, but it's actually in real life, so your argument is invalid.
@@___xyz___ 😂🤣
Flying in kerbal space program:
Wait you actually get off the ground?
More like Fight Simulator 2020 smh
Thank you for injecting a new phobia straight into my brain.
some silly people would still think this video is real
You think you’re having a bad day?
Tell that to the person in that bathroom when that happened.
I was on that flight!!
Everyone was clapping and cheering and yelling out, "dude-dude-dude!"
this is a damn fake !! you lyer !!
R/ Wooosh
Yeah, sure you were.
This comment made me laugh
@@matheo9246 r/wooosh
Whoever made this is really good at CGI.
*AWACS Long Caster*
*"Trigger, stop doing stunts. You are in a civilian aircraft and there are no enemies in your area."*
Gotta thank the description for confirming this is fake. I’m not sure I could’ve been able to tell otherwise
Imagine sitting on the shitter when this happened.
Well its fake
Calvin - aah yes I remember sitting on the toilet on short final approach
Damn you can live in an animation? Sick
I know very little about avionics or the physics of air-flight. However, the fact that there has been no news report containing this footage tells you all you need to know about its validity. Not a single tweet from a passenger, ground-crew, independent witness... It's a really good fake, to my untrained eye, but not passing the 'sniff-test.' What little I do know about flying is that at landing speed, such a dramatic roll would drop the plane like a stone, given the sudden loss of lift.
Harry McMahon the way the aircraft handles in this video is enough for it to be deemed fake by someone that knows next to nothing about aviation.
I agree, I couldnt find any other source or news article about this. A 707 has been recorded doing a barrel roll back in 1955. a 707 is 6 feet shorter than a 767 and this is suppose to be a 737 supposedly. Interesting if it did happen to know what happened to the people.
'A barrel roll'. If accurately reported, a barrel roll is not what you, or most people imagine. Which is simply rolling around while maintaining its' course on a flat axis. No, a barrel roll is a plane going forward and maintaining a constant bank and upward pick to one direction, such that it makes loops again and again around an invisible 'column' of forward airspace. It's like using a paint brush to paint a coil around the inside of a barrel.
This requires significant altitude, and most likely if it was done in '55 this is how it was done, because simply pulling the maneuver with such a heavy, sluggish plane means you're definitely losing altitude in the process.
ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html
@@luxspew That's not a barrel roll. Doing that lost him a lot of altitude. Next.
Real wings were supposed to be broken
OniricFlow VR yah
Actually, airplane wings are designed to bend
If they do not bend, they'll just break apart and fall outta the sky dead.
I'm not saying the vid's real, just saying...
OniricFlow VR maybe not but the wing flex or flutter
Cycling Cycles Correct
A 707's wings don't break until they are literal inches from touching when bent upwards. Aviation major here
2.3k ppl think its fake, its just cgi effect
i swear meni things has the weirdest aviatuion content
I'm telling you this is real!!!! I saw it on all the news networks... 😁😂🤣😃😄
I can tell you there are no "Jetz" airliner companies here in Canada. Whoever made this is obviously a very talented CGI artist! Wow! Very realistic looking indeed.
Jetz belongs to Air Canada: www.aircanada.com/no/en/aco/home/book/charters.html
Please look up "Air Canada Jetz"
I stand corrected. :(
You are right. I stand corrected. :(
So what is this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Canada_Jetz
If your ever having a bad day,think of the guy in the airplane bathroom during the flip.
Computer animations do not have personality :))
razvan radu It’s still funny 😃
@@wtfatc4556 It's a joke
PC Games : real physics good graphics and others
Mobile Games :
Thank you for posting this nightmare-fuel video.
Amazon one day shipping be like
Extreme crosswind but then you see 2 little bird flying by as normal condition and no wind
Birds love the wind ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html watch and learn
That was 3 jets flying in formation, not birds. But your point remains valid.
Oh man😂😹😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂!
When Ryanair has its first ever crash in history be like: 0:10
A320 planes have all been equipped with a feature that corrects bank angles plus people out side like you who filmed it would have been blown away...
Tell me you're joking please
I'm convinced, from a photography standpoint, THIS IS REAL! No pixelation anywhere!
Read the description smarty pants
If this is real, then it is absolutely amazing! Check out the flex on those wings. That pilot has some serious skills, but thank goodness the bird was built well, or one of those wings would have snapped off and this would have been a tragedy. That pilot though...wow.
If it's a fake, then well done. That's some Hollywood level editing.
Look at the smoke from engine. Talented CGI guy.
ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html you got it--not CGI, someones trying to take credit for awesome training film.
Quentin Hicks
Those are not smokes. They are vortices of air from the wings. Anyway the video is fake😁
It is real--the deflection of all control surfaces isas it would be, and the flex in the wing can not be faked by a NONE pilot CGI geek. He'dhave no idea. this plane is designed to do a chandell with ease or in a strong wind shear either way. He had full power 7 seconds before roll thats why they lived--they were "going around" long before the shear hit them. None pilots don't have a f'ing clue. A 747 will roll, spin fly upside down. This A-319 is much smaller. Built in safety features can NOT over power nature. It's an airplane, not a f'ing magic alien space craft. He came about 11 feet from hitting the ground--because full power had kicked it by then- lucky,! not magic, not fake.
Ah yes the fly by wire lets the pilot do something like this yes ofc.the flight dynamics arent realisitc
we don'at need the repeats or slo mo.. there's a rewind/replay button if we really cared for that.
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, before we take off we must put the plane on sicko mode
Lmao
Thank you for chosing Joseph airlines
İm studying aviation engineering and im can guarantee this is *IMPOSIBLE*
No shit
"Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts
“That’s gotta be the best pirate I’ve ever seen”
Lol 😂 smh
Your not funny.
@@theaviator5637 Neither are you.
@@theaviator5637 *You're
of course its fucking fake, he already proved himself as a cgi creator and a short movie creator. but his work is really good so far, very realistic.
FR34KY clearly not by this standard
I honestly don't get why people hate on this amazing CGI
Better CGI than most movies.
The guy in the restroom was really pissed!
Pretty nice fake, but some rendering issues:
1. Visible sampling noise in motion blur (freeze frame near the end of the clip). Flares don't blur at all.
2. Chromatic ghost in lower left has a single-frame movement discontinuity around 0:16 + 1s. Doesn't respond appropriately when camera pans up.
3. Atmospheric distortion artifact around control tower when smoke reaches it (0:13 + 1s). Too much atmospheric distortion for the conditions, anyway.
4. Chain link fence defocus blur is too soft/opaque--probably composited in a gamma-corrected color space.
There are no rendering issues, Pal! You simply like to discredit amazing things that happen. Look up barrel rolls on Google and put a sock in it.
This is a fake video. It's definitely cgi. lol
I can't believe the level of intelligence it must take to believe this video is real. I'll bet you think the Earth is flat, too.
Good, I'm glad you believe it....oh, by they way, I got some cheap ocean front property in Arkansas, I can sell you, real cheap!
I'd like to award "BandfromtheBand" with this medal for biggest idiot on youtube this year. I'm so proud of you!
Pretty sure Leslie Nielsen would have to be the captain of that plane, remember Airplane the Movie.
No, just a trained pilot ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html watch and learn
Leslie Neilsen played the doctor...
Surely you're not serious
I take my coffee black......like my men.
Over Macho Grande?
0:13 I thought the plane would be crashed and into flames for a second! But luckily the pilots have some very good skills with that airplane.
@iFIopsi K. well u might think it’s not but in my opinion it is.
@@babydaisy1 read the description lmaoo
@@Silent-ji6bc it says in a new fake story. So I guess I’m wrong then silly me! People do not usually read the description first before they comment on that.
As far as fakes go, this is as real as you can get. Nice job.
this really looks like an animation plus the guy's reaction isn't really expressive lol
Read the description
1. On the loop the plane shoud've be dead
2. The winglets seem like from an A310 not A320
3. His ears shoud explode by how low it was flying
AgusAviation you really don’t know anything about aero planes ..do you!?
@@General5USA are u saying that that maneuver is possible?
might be fake but its still cool to watch and imagine
It was on the news . not fake
don't know what to believe tbh..either way its amazing
@@backyardbuilttrucks1 read the description
Absolutely amazing CGI.
Despite other comments this is totally plausible according to physics. The ailerons oscillate proportionally with the pilot corrections because like in a floating boat, the correction speed depends on velocity and inertia so the viewer will perceive an opposite motion. Because of the gyroscopic effect and stress, the wings bend accordingly and because of the approaching angle, the viewer can't correctly perceive the approaching speed making the plane seem impossibly airborne when it should be stalling.
It's also plausible that the CGI company who posted this video (MeniThings) happened to have a cameraman hanging around an airport when this happened......but somehow I doubt it.
Here'a a link to a trailer for some of their other work
ruclips.net/video/FY3ZCZ1Ojr0/видео.html
When your crush on the plane and your the captain
Definitely fake. If a real commercial jet liner spun like that, it would've stalled out and slammed into the ground.
How is it fake there are several airports that have huge crosswinds off and on during the year . test pilots have barrell rolled 707 , 737 , military planes many times . if you watch the flaps on the wings it is a indication it is not faked.
backyardbuilttrucks1 you have to be trolling. There are several dead giveaways that this is fake. Here’s a few. And to get it out the way I am an aviation expert.
First: the ailerons and spoilers are going the wrong way for the roll motions that you see. Second: the wings could not bend down at that angle without snapping. Third: the Airbus A320 and all FBW Airbus aircraft have a roll limiter that prevents rolls beyond about 45 degrees. Fourth: the aircraft is not moving fast enough to stay airborne at those extreme angles and in general is moving to slow. Fifth: Airliners can roll but not that fast and certainly not in landing configuration. Sixth: No pilot that wasn’t trying kill everyone would even attempt an approach that is so unstable. Seventh: nobody would actually stand there and film such an event. I’m done.
There are so many "experts" in this thread. It would be nice to see them say what kind of expert exactly they are and where that expertise comes from.
To your dead giveaways:
1. You make it look like the pilot could only have done this on purpose. What about a plane that is "out of control"?
2. Sure, no pilot would try such an approach but is it possible that the pilot didn't know a near-surface gush would hit his plane in that exact moment? Plus, at 0:04-0:05 it looks like he's breaking off his attempt.
3. The real altitude of that plane should be much higher than it looks. The blurred fence indicates magnification.
I'm not saying it's not a fake. But I wouldn't call it a fake just yet.
雷特 6 years USAF, A&P certified mechanic, have been working at Lockheed Martin since 2011, lifelong self study of aircraft and aerodynamics. Good enough?
I don't know. You tell me. Lockheed hasn't been producing any comparable aircraft since 1984. Do you have any experience with investigating flight incidents involving abnormal wind conditions? Are you familiar with the wing flex of modern civil aircraft? The wing tip of a Boeing 777 for instance is designed to flex up to 25 feet. An A319 is a fairly modern aircraft. You can't compare that to a Hercules.
And again... the way you put it was that the pilot in the video is supposed to have done the roll one purpose. That doesn't make any sense of course. It is obvious that the roll is not done on purpose. Even if it is computer-generated, it is not designed to look like a voluntary action.
Can you at least try to look at it from that angle?
I like it :-)
İts the best pirate i have ever seen.
So it would seem
Haha I came from that video as well.
Tom Cruise taking it to a whole new level😎
Denzel Washington in Flight 2 coming summer 2019. Can he fly high on cocaine ? He will even land the plane.
how did that plane even stay on air???
i shud hv stalled at that speed and crashed straight away
How did you pass English class?
@@broddsaviation5471 damn this shit one year ago u actually replied
Underpants sales skyrocketed that day
Finnaly a version where not all comments say "FAKE"
Common tell is the perspective, and the edit. The perspective is imposed, via the fence (on it's own layer with a blur for distance), there is another plane wing on the left on another layer, giving the impression if the viewer is 5.5 ft tall, the fence is 10 ft.... with all that the plane doesn't scale correctly, nor to the birds flying by indicate abnormal wind conditions, nor does the mic suggest there's enough wind to cause this plane to barrel roll against it's ailerons.
I looked up the company, they are professionals at this. Kinda. Well, this is free so don't expect too much.
I love your stuff but this is not as realistic as others
Läski Mursu hes a animater duh iys fake do more research
watch a bigger jet do the same ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html
@@mynewfamanda that was at a way higher altitude and sufficient speed with perfect conditions
Real or not, still makes my stomach hurt to watch it. That's stressful.
ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html watch this demo
Well if you were really on that plane, you'd feel very nauseous and vomit everywhere!!!!!
It seems an Air Canada airplane because it shows a maple logo on its tail. 0:13
This is fucking amazing man!
Some WWI dude: im gonna be the best pilot ive never seen..
WWI Dude 2: so worth it.
How planes attract mates.
This is an Airbus A320 not Boeing 737. Vertical stabilizer is a dead giveaway. Not to mention it is being fake.
ruclips.net/video/DGuGzqGsWF0/видео.html - this is real (Antonov-74, 27-05-2000, Kharkiv, Ukraine) - so, ...
ruclips.net/video/VMMCIQS_HeY/видео.html - one more (Antonov-72)
ruclips.net/video/wJfK6AcUH40/видео.htmlm39s - check it (Antonov-32, Hostomel, Ukraine)
ruclips.net/video/0X6NrWx_xdg/видео.htmlm6s - so, if Antonov's planes can, why Airbus could not?
ruclips.net/video/-KNbKFMBsQE/видео.html - Boeing 707 also can ^)))
LOL, Impossible at any altitude or wind. A heavy commercial Jet Liner can not perform those kind of maneuvers especially this close to the ground and going that slow. But nicely Photo chopped by Russian Hackers. :-)
Not true. Pilot Tex Johnston did a barrel roll with a 747 in 1955. There is a video on RUclips showing it.
they have been known to do this before. One air had a 737 do a barrel roll.
Total bullshit!
@@walldoo99 High up in the Sky, and not that slow.
@@KsAdventures It's possible, Yes, but on that speed? No, it would crash. No engine has enough power to recover from that.
The level 12 ppl in my gta missions:
Plane: takes off at night in fog
What it feels like:
737? Looks more like an A320
JTDanteAviation it does
JTDanteAviation its a airbus 737 @kewr.spotter
What the flip
A319 -- at least according to Air Canada that's what all Jetz charter planes are
I thought so too
That’s an AirBus A 320.
I laughed i lost
The description of video actually says: "fictional creation of an impossible maneuver"
You're welcome
That’s the best pirate I’ve ever seen
so fak its funny
Elena Tassi do more research
Oh! is it really "FAK?"
It's not so funny when you're sitting in the captains chair--I've been through this. Yes, flipped upside down on approach
watch and learn ruclips.net/video/AaA7kPfC5Hk/видео.html
@@mynewfamanda Yes it is possible but this footage is cgi you big spastic.
Most likely from a flight simulator game. Fence resolution is poor. Lighting from sunset on left and reflection on cockpit windows facing right and sharpness of video camera focus on the plane are all too good as to be using a high end camera that can probably do HDR. If fence resolution was good then this could be CGI, but it is not.
Surely the resolution of the fence is so because the fence is out of focus because the focus is on the plane?
This is taking first place for the most stupid comment on this page.
I saw this animation in another video and it was so crazy, I had to look it up. This is a seriously good video though, it fooled me until I read the description.
Anybody can roll an airliner 500 feet off the deck. This is the mostest realest extra most bestest footage ever!!
Fake
I love the editing
nice CG！
People who disliked the video are the ones who never read the description.
Yup
The flexing in the wings are a pretty nice touch for CGI
This video is so underrated and deserves more views, so I watched it 5 times !!!
Nice RC model!👍👍
Ho Lee Shyt & Wat Wentwong were piloting this Chinese Airlines Dreamliner when all hell broke loose. It was the greatest Save in Avionics history. Even greater than the Miracle on the Hudson, piloted by America's famed Sully Sullenberger...No Animals or Humans were harmed in filming of this video.....WORD !!!
I know this is fake, but it's satisfying to watch
pretty sure the wings would have snapped off if that was real
"That gotta be the best pirate ive ever seen"
"So it would seem..."
This guy took the "go around" maneuver literally by the words.