No replica! Original Ford GT40 sound - Engine noise & Exhaust Notes!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 янв 2025
- Listen this great Ford GT40 sound! An original 1968 Ford GT40 Mk1 sounding loud exhaust sound and engine noise during warm-up, this is one of best cars in the history of motorsport! All info about this car right down.
🔥 SUBSCRIBE for next vid ! bit.ly/Sub-TheG...
Geniune Ford GT40 MK1 chassis,Coming directly from the Willment family collection, Forming part of the original Ford sanction of 100 vehicles (10 prototypes and 90 production models).
In 1981, John Williment secured the rights to GT40P/1087, GT40P/1088 and GT40P/1089 form JWA for leftover chassis that he had collected. Beginning in 1996 construction finally began on these three cars which are built up from original, un-used and un-raced chassis, in fact a Gulf-spec car.
the Ford GT-40 1088 remained in the ownership of Janet Willment until being sold privately in 2006.Currently (2018) this car is raced by Patrick Hautot in Classic Endurance Racing 2018.
Full Car Specs:
1968 Ford Mark I, Chassis Number GT40P/1088
Maker: Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan
Engine: Ford V8 with Gurney-Weslake cylinder heads, overhead valves, 302 cubic inches - 4942cc
Horsepower: 425 @ 6000 rpm
Pounds per horsepower: 5.1
Weight: 2186 pounds
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Carburettors: Weber 48 IDA
Gearbox: ZF 5DS-25 / Type Zero
Brakes: Girling ventilated disc
Wheels: BRM 15'' diameter rim with 10'' front and 14'' rear
Body:Lightweight moulded fibreglass with wide 'Gulf' rear bodywork arches
Height: 40.5”
Width: 70”
Wheelbase: 95”
Overall length: 164.5”
🎥 The Gallery Cars & Sounds
⭕⭕ Car lover and Racing addict ⭕⭕
#loud #ford #exhaust #sound
📷⤵:
Instagram: / thegallerycars
Facebook: / thegallerycars
Google+: plus.google.co...
Genuine Ford GT40 Mk1 Chassis GT40 P/1078 : goo.gl/53a3pV
Rare Ford GT40 Roadster protoype (Only 2 units alive) - Exhaust and Track action : goo.gl/KAbPQm
Absolutely beautiful car and sounds. Great work!
Hi Austin! thanks for the comment 🤗
Thank you for the continued entertainment, the earlier rally car footage was intense, and congrats on 50k subs!
thank you very much for your comments this gives me encouragement and motivation to record something more.. this is fresh air!👍
What a car !! wonderful sound!!
Please ... listen to this beautiful car with good speakers ... not on a Sh ** phone 😜
Sorry but you have the details wrong, the Maker wasn't Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan (they Funded the project so technically the owners) it was John Wyer racing who built all the Mk1-3 in the uk.... Once Ford Won using the Mk2 in 1966 he sold Ford Advanced Vehicles Ltd slough to Wyer so he could build the 'All American' Mk4 in Michigan (the car they messed up the aero that ultimately Ken Miles died in) , you can spot the US cars a mile off as they didn't look anything like the classic Broadly Gt40, plus the car above has a Weslake modified engine (another UK based company) not the Shelby 427. The Irony is the most famous Gulf GT40 that won lemans back to back and was the camera car in the movie Lemans (it was famously was cut up to fit camera gear) was designed, Built and run by the British.
You are the one who is wrong. If it were not for Ford, and its engineers the GT40 would not exist. The Lola was only a test bed, using a different cylinder head on the Ford 302 does not make it a British car either. The true basis for the final body design was the 'Mustang 1 concept, designed and built in Dearborn. As far as the early developments are concerned it was lead by American engineers. As a manufacturer you can hire anyone qualified, country of origin is irrelevant. Example, Duntov was Russian, so the Corvette can not be truly American, "its really a Russian car".
Bob, if it wasn't for Ford's money the Gt would have stayed the Lola Mk6Gt and probably wouldn't have won anything because Lola was run on a shoe string. The Tub design was a carbon copy of the Lola Mk6Gt to the degree you can take the clam shells off a mk1 GT and fit them to a Mk6Gt, there is no debating this......The Mid engine Mustang project was a failure!! thats why Ford farmed out the project in the first place....... Even Ford recognize the Lola Mk6Gt as the car the GT was based. Ford payed for the right to fit Ford badges on the Lola but to say Ford Engineers were the ones who designed and built it is WAY!!! off, from my knowledge only one guy was flown to the Uk from the Mid engine Mustang concept project and even he had very limited knowledge of Mid engine race cars (hence the reason the project was binned and not used for the Gt program). As far as i'm aware even Ford himself recognized how little the mk1-3 America was actually involved in which is why he moved the operation and had the Gt completely redesigned in America (Mk3 on).
Were not talking about a Russian born Engineer working in America here, were talking about a car already assembled by a different manufacture in a different country that has been bought and developed by some one else. Think Ac Cobra...... That was a car designed and built in the Uk then Hotrodded in America, Shelby developed the car that started off life as an AC Ace and thats what Ford/Shelby did with the GT...... The fact the Gulf car was Wyer's interpretation of the work Shelby did is neither here nor there (btw Gulf was Wyer's sponsor..... he did the same thing in a slightly different way, he went light weight with the Wyer Mirage/Gulf cars)
Even the Bag of snakes exhaust that Ford was so proud of wasn't thought up by them, it was ripped off from Cosworth DFV (don't forget Ford had no experience with mid engine cars so they took ideas from all the cutting edge engineers of the time)
@@K2edg It is very obvious you can't stand the fact that Ford created the GT and many other awesome performance vehicles, especially during the 'golden age era' of 1960's. Here is one for you, you probably don't know. During the days of the 917, one of the Porsche's weaknesses (there were more) was in the valve train. An engineer at Ford Engineering Research (in the USA) said to Wyer,
"At Ford we can make a pushrod engine in which the valve train is safe to 10,000 RPM, he also said if I could obtain from Porsche all the relevant data, he would run it through a Ford computer and design a valve spring which give you an adequate margin of safety. Of course the germans did not want help from a Ford engineer but this is but one example of the prowess and expertise at Ford and American ingenuity. You obviously think you know what you are talking about, but what you have stated is only conjecture to fit you're own jealousy. BTW, I am a multiple Ford GT owner and other Ford performance cars. I have broke bread with the Ford family,
personally know many at the top of the current Ford Performance, and have read just about everything. You're comment and conjecture is irrelevant and changes nothing.
Bob, No i think the Gt is a great car but i am sick of hearing how the Americans pulled it out of thin air with no respect to the guys that designed and built it, ask your self why the mk1-3 was assembled in the Uk ( prototypes were built in the Lola factory) when it would have been cheaper and easier to do it in America?. I bet you never owned the Mk4 (the all american GT's as Ford called them) but rather the better looking Broadley designed cars. The irony is it's only fairly recently Ford admitted the Mk6Gt was the father of the Ford Gt after years of creaming the credit for it's design (Note i use the word 'Design')
BTW Porsche didn't need any help, they carried on winning at lemans way after it was out of reach of Ford. Skip on to 2016 and Ford was so obsessed with winning at Lemans they didn't even tell Ferrari there was a competition, the result was Ferrari didn't even field a works car but that didn't stop the gloating and PR spin on a their 18th place finish to those that didn't know the difference between a Class win and Overall win.
Personally i think the Gt was the result of a Childish rant about not getting his own way with Ferrari, i don't for one minute defend Ferrari (i know Enzo was a megalomaniac) but at the same time he built that business from scratch himself and wasn't given it so i can understand why he wouldn't want to let it go easily (especially the race division he loved so much) but hey history is written by the Victor.
The funny thing is i too have owned a number of Ford performance cars .... sadly not a real GT40, but i did own a Superformance Mk2 Bruce McLaren/Chris Amon replica, i've also spent plenty of time round one of the few Lola Mk6Gt's and a number of real GT40's (including Noel Edmonds road car at the time and Bamford's JCB car) i have great respect for the what they achieved i just don't like how long it took them to acknowledge Broadley/Lola's role in how the GT40 came to be and when you see both cars up close you will understand why (IMHO Ford 'Developed' the GT with their huge resources but no amount of money will change the fact it was built using a different manufactures Chassis which in turn was designed way before Ford fell out with Ferrari).
I don't need to argue with you, you have no idea what a Lola Mk6GT is let alone seen one, so how would you know? you have drank the Henry Ford II Kool-aid and are blinkered by the love for Ford.
You're mixing up the Mk4 with the J-car.