CATIA Icem and Freestyle Control Points Fundamentals

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024

Комментарии • 12

  • @Xaocka
    @Xaocka 3 года назад +1

    Thank you!!! Your lessons are invaluable! Keep 'em coming!

  • @Rovins85
    @Rovins85 2 года назад +1

    Great Tutorial mr.Alcini!. I am glad that I discovered a few functionalities I was not aware of in the control points command. That made my life easier in catia. Thanks!
    I hope some day you make another tutorial regarding to matching constraint command... ;)

    • @GerardAlcini
      @GerardAlcini  2 года назад +1

      Thank you, Jordi...will try doing a matching constraint video when time permits.

  • @1bhamze
    @1bhamze 3 года назад +1

    Great information! Thank you!

  • @huytranvan3145
    @huytranvan3145 3 года назад +1

    Great video. I hope that do you have a good healthy to make more video about icrem.

  • @fddesign
    @fddesign 3 года назад +1

    great video Gerald :)

    • @GerardAlcini
      @GerardAlcini  3 года назад

      thanks Francois! Hope you are having a good summer!

  • @oleksiidergun1580
    @oleksiidergun1580 3 года назад +1

    Thanks!

  • @fardin5059
    @fardin5059 2 года назад

    excellent, enjoyed it.
    A question about harmonization, I have a noisy surface of order 5 x 5, I want to harmonize the second row in say V direction(row V2) and I want the control points of this row to
    move tangentionally in order to not losing the tangent condition to the adjacent surface in boundary V1 , I don't find any of the harmonization options
    to work in this way in Freestyle workbench.
    I wondered maybe "support" options affect the direction of CPs movement in harmonization but it dose not.
    may you suggest a way.
    Thanks for you great video.

    • @GerardAlcini
      @GerardAlcini  2 года назад

      Hi Fardin...a little late with my reply, sorry. If you need to protect the tangent condition to an adjacent surface, and the control points are "noisy", then perhaps the adjacent surface is the actual culprit. I suggest imposing a matching constraint of the surface that you want to clean up to the neighboring patch, then modify those control points (of the neighboring patch). Impose a graphic "dress-up" on the patch that is being matched so you can see the control points when modifying the driving surface....I hope that makes sense!

    • @fardin5059
      @fardin5059 2 года назад

      @@GerardAlcini Thanks so much Mr Alcini,
      I appreciate your answer.