Thank you for great work on your youtube channel. I had a question about Atem Mini Extreme ISO (HDMI as well as SDI). So we have 2 HDMI Aux outputs and we an send Multiview through that. My question is can we have Cam 1 to 4 via Multiview 1 via HDMI 1 and Cam 5 to 8 via Multiview 2 via HDMI 2. Assuming I have connected 8 cams to my Atem Mini Extreme. And similarly for the SDI version can I do 4 different multiviews with a combination of different cameras, etc. Waiting for your reply...
@@TarunsP.O.V I’ve had it on for a few hours without issue. Since it’s not recording in camera, it doesn’t heat up as fast. I also have the heat sensitivity setting set to high so it would take longer before it gave me a warning. I’d say test it first, but you should be ok. I’ve had a couple times I left it on by accident, walked away for hours, and it was still on and fine.
@@TheRealistYJ any time you have HDMI with a camera you’ll get a slight delay. I typically delay my audio by about 3 frames and I’m good to go. Hasn’t been an issue for me.
I'm new to this and looking to set up my streaming system, probably using Riverside. I think this camera is great, but I'm wondering if there's a less techy option that still gives a clear picture. I'd appreciate your help
Can the HDMI cable also be plugged into the graphics card of my laptop ? Sorry I’m new to this streaming thing,I’m getting a new laptop as well ,so I wonder if the internal graphics card is adequate.
Typically a graphics card HDMI port is an output, not an input. I'm afraid you would need a capture card still in order to capture a video signal into a computer. However you can use the ZVE10 as a webcam using a USB-C cable. I think it's limited to 1080p so you won't get a full 4K signal but that might be enough for your needs.
@@zephanmoses Okay thanks for your advice’I’m disappointed though ,those capture cards seem very expensive. I’ll see what I can do anyway. I’m a bit confused about the lenses for the Sony ZV E10. It’s different from the old 35mm system . I don’t want to be too close to the camera on my streams ,so I’m not sure which lens is right for me . I think the equivalent 35mm or 50mm on the old SLR system would be okay ,but I don’t know what the equivalent lens width would be for the Sony as it’s different. I’m told the 16mm lens you suggest is the equivalent to 24mm on the old DSLR system . It’s all rather confusing to choose a lens for a cropped image setup .
@@jazzycattruthkitten4101 capture cards aren’t that expensive. On the low end there’s the Elgato Camlink which you can usually grab for $99. There’s cheaper knockoffs on Amazon for half the price but you’ll get what you pay for. As far as lenses go the 16mm is great for me. The camera is mounted to my desk so it’s not very far away from me. The only reason I’d recommend someone go for anything tighter than 16 would be if they’re sitting further away from the camera and have a good amount of space. You’re just reading about the crop factor due to the sensor size when you see that 16 is equivalent to something else but 16mm is still 16mm. It’s just not as wide as 16mm would be on a camera that has a full frame sensor size.
Hi Zephan, thank you for the video. I stream a U15 curling team's games live, and I am looking for something we can use for live streaming, with a great zoom, but as cheap as possible. Unfortunately, the cheapest camera on this video is far outside our price range. Right now I am using a webcam with a 9X zoom, but that zoom is not enough. Do you have any suggestions for a camera I can use with OBS, but can be run through USB, as the HDMI port on my laptop doesn't work?
@@ScottsBride2008 while you’re relatively limited in that price range, you might be able to find an older camcorder with a big zoom. The Vixia G70 is like the lowest I’d go but that’s $1k. Maybe try the Feelworld PTZ cams?
Hello, thank you for the video. I have the Sony A7rV just upgraded from A7IV. I have an unlimited budget when it comes to zoom calls, streaming etc but can also be used for videos. what would you recommend?
What do I recommend as far as what? It sounds like you have a camera already. What else are you trying to accomplish? It's a bit of a vague question so it's hard to answer that.
@@Milkybar882 I'm not giving attitude, I'm being playful. You can't tell emotion over text. Sorry if it came off that way. What I'm trying to say is to simply say that you have unlimited budget, doesn't tell me much about what you really want to spend or what you really want to achieve. It's kind of like asking how long is a piece of string - the answer is it depends. So I need more information if you're looking for my help. Me personally, I don't spend more than $600 on my Sony ZVE10 for home and streaming use. But I use my Canon C70 and Canon CRN500 PTZ camers which cost thousands when I'm doing client work in the field because they allow me more features and capabilities, not to mention that they're going to function better in low light, have larger sensors, etc. So I'd love to give you a good answer but I really need more information about your unique situation.
Hi Zephan, great job on the video and well explained! The ZVE10 with the lens do an amazing job but I can't afford it by now. I want to start streaming my DJ sets and I'm looking for an affordable and also a good 4K camera to use. I started recording my session practices with a a Gopro 10 but it cashed, I don't know what happened but it doesn't turn on again. I spent too much time trying everything and watching all the videos on RUclips and nothing work, the manufacture guarantee is expired as well so I'm done with it and decide to get a good camera for my streaming's in a rage of $500 which is my budget. I use OBS studio and a Focusrite 212 as an audio interface. Which camera would you recommend me to start doing a professional stream in my studio and outside? Also keeping in mind the camera overheat. Thanks in advance. Pablo
@@Jokeniv Hmm haven't had an issue on my end and I've been using mine for 2 years. Are you recording in camera too? Are you doing extended (all day) streaming?
Great detailed explanation of your setup, thank you! One question, using your MV7 mic plugged into the XLR on the Rode Streamer x are there any sync timing issues between voice and lip movement which needs adjusting vs a mic with 3.5 jack straight into camera? Thanks
I think it’s great for any talking head work. Sit or stand is fine. It’s the right depth of field and field of view for that. Most of my RUclips videos use that lens and it’s just mounted next to my computer screen.
@@ariblochpro the 18-50 is a kit lens with a slow aperture. It won’t give you a shallow depth of field and it’s not going to do as well unless the lighting scenario is near perfect. The f1.4 gives you the blurred out background look that most people want and it’s much sharper because it’s a prime lens.
@@zephanmoses interesting. Personally I have the Sony a7iv and use the Tamron 28-75 2.8 for video, mostly talking heads, and it is fine. But in this case researching which lens to recommend to a friend planning to get the ZV-e10 (also for talking heads like vlog and digital courses).
@@ariblochpro A 28-85 gives you more room to zoom but it's just the same to physically move the camera closer to the person or person closer to the camera. I find the 16mm is great for me only because I sit down at the same desk with the same setup every time. But if someone is operating the camera and will be constantly moving around or needing to adjust then obviously a zoom lens allows for more flexibility. It's just not nearly as much of a shallow depth at 2.8 vs. 1.4
Ouch, that's not in my budget haha, at least all of the required gear would easily set me back $1200-$1500 here with taxes and bad currency. Have wanted to get into streaming and content creation, the PC is good enough and have pretty good video editing abilities (not on this channel) I guess I'll just start with what I have and upgrade if there's even some remote success!
I always tell people first and foremost to start with what they have, beyond that you can look at some decent webcams like the Obsbot or the Insta360 Link if you have $200-300 and use the free OBS software. But this video features the camera that a lot of home streamers are using for the best quality. There's definitely a big jump in quality and price going from a webcam to a mirrorless camera so this is the cheapest mirrorless I'd recommend.
@@zephanmoses Thank you for the reply and advice! I have spent upwards of $1400 on a camera before, it's just that it's obsolete now haha. And if the good webcams are $300-$400 the ZV-E10 is probably just worth selling some of the random stuff I collect to cover the additional cost as at least it's a multi-functional tool! Appreciate it!
@@Unhhrr haven’t had any issues. Since it’s AC powered and not using a battery it helps reduce heat. It’s also not recording in camera so that keeps the heat down too.
@@Lightflames85 you won’t find a mirrorless camera for much cheaper. At that point you’ll be in the $300 range for certain webcams but you won’t find a camera that can take interchangeable lenses and blur out a background. The ZVE10 is commonly used by thousands of streamers now. It might be outside of your range but I typically am teaching professional videographers how to livestream if you look at the rest of my channel content so it’s well within the type of equipment price range we’re using and teaching here.
Hello Zephan, thanks for this very informative video! I want to buy a camera for my streaming setup and also want to use it for my RUclips Videos in the near future. Should I go with the Sony ZV-E10 like you do in this Video, but instead of the StreamerX I would use the Elgato Cam link or should I buy the Sony A6100 or 6400 or 6600 and use it with the cam link? Thanks for your answer and kind regards from Germany!
The magic audio actually sounded terrible. I definitely think you're overhyping that prospect of it. But it's a great videon nonetheless. Very informative!
I do think there is an audience of people that want to switch from a webcam to an actual camera when it comes to streaming, and making a guide or video about how you set that up would be great. For instance, how would you go about connecting the ZV E10 and get it to record video for you in the best quality possible and how do you set that up on your computer?
Thanks for that. I have a video in the works on a setup I made for a news anchor who is using the camera to record live news hits for her work. It’s essentially the ZVE10 with a Rode Streamer X and a Blackmagic Video Assist. I’ll keep this in mind for the future!
I appreciate the comment but in today's day and age, the only option you have sub $600 for a decent camera with 4K capability is going to be using your smartphone or a $300 webcam. It's not reasonable to expect to do anything below that type of budget. For reference, a typical cinema camera that I use on my livestream costs $6000, requires a $4000 lens and has at least another $1000 in SD cards, batteries and accessories and that's before you put it on a tripod. This industry is expensive, my channel aims to teach those who are intermediate or advanced professionals.
Man its a good camera on a budget but if you can afford it i think for streaming and content creation the sony a7iii is one of the best cameras i have ever tried. Sony is definitely the purveyor of the best cameras and lenses. Though i wish i had the money to afford the zv e10 because the a7iii belongs to my dad😂 this is also a good camera. This world is too expensive to live in when there are so many things that you want lol.
But can you imagine just a small device which takes photos and records videos is at the price point of a thousand bucks? Honestly I just want to win a giveaway from some content creator to get some streaming equipment. In my country buying locally is even more of a nightmare because it's even more money. What XLR deck would you recommend and what mic would you recommend for streaming under $500 for both things combined if you can tell me.
@@District_keenu there’s plenty of cheap audio mixers but it depends how many inputs you need and what features you want. I use the Zoom livetrak L8 as my main mixer and also recently added in a Rodecaster. But you can find analog mixers from Behringer for like $80-100. As far as a mic that’s kind of a broad question. What kind of mic? Wireless lavalier? Wired? Shotgun mic? Every livestream event has different needs.
@@zephanmoses ok sorry for the vague question. I wanted a mic with a boom arm included. I can spend $300 on the Mackie dlz compact xs but the mic is the main issue. I cannot find anything good under $100
@@District_keenu typically a boom pole is sold separately. At that price you might need to look at the older Rode NTG microphones or maybe a used Deity mic.
@@arda830 professional videographers use cinema level cameras ranging from $3-10K so a $600 camera for the body is very reasonable. You won’t find a mirrorless camera for less than that unless it’s used, or much older and especially not capable of doing 4K. You’d have to go the webcam route and then you’re losing shallow depth of field that you’d find in mirrorless cameras with larger sensors and interchangeable lenses, along with low light capabilities and overall quality of image. So yea, when it comes to live streaming if you don’t have the budget, keep using your phone or the webcam built into your computer. Any 4K webcam worth using is going to cost you $200-300 (look up the Obsbot and Insta360 link) and even still the quality will look webcam-ish without a good lighting setup. That’s just how it is.
16mm is a terrible focal length for talking head work, unless you stay wide and away. Get close and personal and I hope you and your guests like your noses thick. With an APS sensor, something like 50mm would be nice and will give you creamy backgrounds if you get a f/1.4 or something. Maybe a 35mm if don't get too close. But it's not gonna happen in a 5x5 feet room. Portrait photography requires distance
Portrait photography is different than videography. 16mm is a very commonly used lens on this style of APS-C camera and works just fine for all of my videos. All of my stuff is talking head, it’s close and personal (per your comments) and my nose is just fine thank you. A 35 on this sensor is going to be much closer to a 50 on a full frame which simply wouldn’t work in such a small space like the one I have and many others have for their home office setup. The 16mm comes out to about 24ish after the crop. And for the record, my APS-C sensor and 16mm lens has been used on my RUclips for well over a year and a half and hasn’t prevented me from building a following or teaching others.
@@zephanmoses Sorry for writing like a dick. Your following is a testament to your efforts and to the quality of your material. Please keep my comment as a suggestion for improvement though. I understand that the tight space is a big restriction, but we better clarify this when making suggestions for equipment improvements, especially expensive ones. Videography or photography, the geometry of the image is the same for the same sensor. And the traditional minimum focal length for flattering shots is 85mm FF. A bit more than 55mm in an APS. Many pros even use huge teles. 16mm APS translates to something close to 24mm in terms of geometry. It can work for wider frames like upper torso shots, but for tighter head-shots the geometry distortion becomes more pronounced. I cannot post links, but if you search for the photo main-qimg-bf4bec815f0cf72e67cbbfd4ff10feed-lq on google you will see a very nice example in quora
@@dimitris470 I understand where an 85mm makes perfect sense for portraits. I’ve used the Canon 85mm on my other cameras for plenty of corporate video work and some headshot photos. I was strictly speaking from the standpoint of a home streaming camera setup for use similar to my scenario. It’s not possible to make an all encompassing answer. If we’re looking at it from that perspective half the content on RUclips would be useless because there is no “best” it’s all subjective and what works for one won’t work for everyone. All we can do is choose what’s right for us and if it works, we can recommend it. In all fairness, I use titles that work with the RUclips algorithm because people don’t search for “lens that works for 70% of people live streaming from home” they search for “best” or “cheapest” or “top”, so admittedly my titles and explanations are subjected to some scrutiny because I’m working with the algorithm here. But again, people aren’t likely to be using a 50 or 85 for a home setup and if it’s a corporate streaming setup we’re usually leveraging zooms anyways because we have to accommodate adjusting our shots of conference speakers and presenters.
@@dimitris470 tell us you don't know about cameras without telling us lol. This is a good example where theoretical knowledge doesn't apply to practical knowledge
@@docen67 you won’t find a mirrorless camera for much cheaper than $600-700. At that point you’re looking at a webcam. Just being realistic about what’s out there on the market. My corporate video work uses a $5000 camera and that’s before I add any lenses and accessories. In case you’re new here on the channel I teach videographers and filmmakers how to live stream. If you’re looking for someone who teaches how do just do things cheap, I’m not your guy. I teach how to do things on a budget within my industry. It’s like saying you could ride a bicycle from Washington DC to New York, sure you could do it, but a car makes a whole lot more sense. I’m recommending a Honda civic over a Porsche here.
@@MR_DOME the camera is $600 body only and my regular cinema camera is $6000. Even a decent 4K webcam these days will cost you $300 (look at the Obsbot and Insta360 link as examples). This Sony camera is a very affordable option. You won’t find a comparable mirrorless camera that allows for interchangeable lenses so that you can get the necessary depth of field for anything less than that. When you toss an F1.4 prime lens on this camera you cannot recreate a similar image with a webcam. It’s just not possible.
@@zephanmoses although I agree with the camera aspect although you can buy a used different model for less, this is in no way a budget video. Why? Because you really didn’t went for the budget part of anything. Let me give you an example. You chose a Shure MV7 for the mic. Is it budget? No, not even in Shure standards because the SM58 is just the same for a bit more than half the price. You just went with a slight cheaper SM7B but hey, it’s fancy. Guess what’s budget, a Behringer XM8500 which, surprise surprise, is almost as good as the SM7B and only a tiny percentage of users will notice the difference and it costs less than 1/3 of the MV7 and never in streaming. The problem with videos claiming things being budget is the reality their creators. To a person that buys a couple of Rolls Royce a Porsche is also a budget car… except it’s not.
Jumped from my 5100 to the ZV as soon as it came out and I love this camera. Super sharp and beautiful video. I use an Avermedia 4k usb capture.
Thank you for great work on your youtube channel. I had a question about Atem Mini Extreme ISO (HDMI as well as SDI). So we have 2 HDMI Aux outputs and we an send Multiview through that. My question is can we have Cam 1 to 4 via Multiview 1 via HDMI 1 and Cam 5 to 8 via Multiview 2 via HDMI 2. Assuming I have connected 8 cams to my Atem Mini Extreme. And similarly for the SDI version can I do 4 different multiviews with a combination of different cameras, etc. Waiting for your reply...
The extreme doesn’t have two multi views. Only one. You’d have to graduate to the constellation 2ME to get two multi views.
@@zephanmoses Thanks a lot for a prompt reply...
The editing on this video is excellent. Pay your editor more.
Would you use this camera for a live podcast shoot ?
@@dnaadmail9799 I don’t see why not. Just make sure you have the AC battery adapter so you can power it as long as you need.
I have a question,
Will it overheat if i do live streaming for 5 hours?
@@TarunsP.O.V I’ve had it on for a few hours without issue. Since it’s not recording in camera, it doesn’t heat up as fast. I also have the heat sensitivity setting set to high so it would take longer before it gave me a warning. I’d say test it first, but you should be ok. I’ve had a couple times I left it on by accident, walked away for hours, and it was still on and fine.
@@zephanmoses The issue with Sony's, is that they are prone to overheating. Not sure if I would trust it long term.
@ been using mine for years with no overheating ever. But I use it indoors in a controlled environment.
How do you get rid of the image delay when using this camera?
@@TheRealistYJ any time you have HDMI with a camera you’ll get a slight delay. I typically delay my audio by about 3 frames and I’m good to go. Hasn’t been an issue for me.
I'm new to this and looking to set up my streaming system, probably using Riverside. I think this camera is great, but I'm wondering if there's a less techy option that still gives a clear picture. I'd appreciate your help
@@JanineEPayne you could use a webcam like the insta360 link or the Obsbot.
Can the HDMI cable also be plugged into the graphics card of my laptop ?
Sorry I’m new to this streaming thing,I’m getting a new laptop as well ,so I wonder if the internal graphics card is adequate.
Typically a graphics card HDMI port is an output, not an input. I'm afraid you would need a capture card still in order to capture a video signal into a computer. However you can use the ZVE10 as a webcam using a USB-C cable. I think it's limited to 1080p so you won't get a full 4K signal but that might be enough for your needs.
@@zephanmoses Okay thanks for your advice’I’m disappointed though ,those capture cards seem very expensive. I’ll see what I can do anyway. I’m a bit confused about the lenses for the Sony ZV E10. It’s different from the old 35mm system . I don’t want to be too close to the camera on my streams ,so I’m not sure which lens is right for me . I think the equivalent 35mm or 50mm on the old SLR system would be okay ,but I don’t know what the equivalent lens width would be for the Sony as it’s different. I’m told the 16mm lens you suggest is the equivalent to 24mm on the old DSLR system . It’s all rather confusing to choose a lens for a cropped image setup .
@@jazzycattruthkitten4101 capture cards aren’t that expensive. On the low end there’s the Elgato Camlink which you can usually grab for $99. There’s cheaper knockoffs on Amazon for half the price but you’ll get what you pay for. As far as lenses go the 16mm is great for me. The camera is mounted to my desk so it’s not very far away from me. The only reason I’d recommend someone go for anything tighter than 16 would be if they’re sitting further away from the camera and have a good amount of space.
You’re just reading about the crop factor due to the sensor size when you see that 16 is equivalent to something else but 16mm is still 16mm. It’s just not as wide as 16mm would be on a camera that has a full frame sensor size.
@@zephanmoses Okay thanks very much for that ,very helpful ,cheers .
@@zephanmoses Okay thanks ,very helpful.
Hi Zephan, thank you for the video. I stream a U15 curling team's games live, and I am looking for something we can use for live streaming, with a great zoom, but as cheap as possible. Unfortunately, the cheapest camera on this video is far outside our price range. Right now I am using a webcam with a 9X zoom, but that zoom is not enough. Do you have any suggestions for a camera I can use with OBS, but can be run through USB, as the HDMI port on my laptop doesn't work?
@@ScottsBride2008 while you’re relatively limited in that price range, you might be able to find an older camcorder with a big zoom. The Vixia G70 is like the lowest I’d go but that’s $1k. Maybe try the Feelworld PTZ cams?
@@zephanmoses Thank you! Appreciate the answer
Hello, thank you for the video. I have the Sony A7rV just upgraded from A7IV. I have an unlimited budget when it comes to zoom calls, streaming etc but can also be used for videos. what would you recommend?
What do I recommend as far as what? It sounds like you have a camera already. What else are you trying to accomplish? It's a bit of a vague question so it's hard to answer that.
@@zephanmoses I don’t want to use my A7RV for daily zooms, streams etc. Need a dedicated video camera
@@Milkybar882 well this video recommends the ZVE10 so.... But I mean if you have unlimited budget go get a Sony Burano haha they're $25,000.
@@zephanmoses thanks for the attitude👍
@@Milkybar882 I'm not giving attitude, I'm being playful. You can't tell emotion over text. Sorry if it came off that way. What I'm trying to say is to simply say that you have unlimited budget, doesn't tell me much about what you really want to spend or what you really want to achieve. It's kind of like asking how long is a piece of string - the answer is it depends. So I need more information if you're looking for my help.
Me personally, I don't spend more than $600 on my Sony ZVE10 for home and streaming use. But I use my Canon C70 and Canon CRN500 PTZ camers which cost thousands when I'm doing client work in the field because they allow me more features and capabilities, not to mention that they're going to function better in low light, have larger sensors, etc.
So I'd love to give you a good answer but I really need more information about your unique situation.
I love the zv-e10 paired with Sigma 18-50 lens.
A much more sane choice for portrait work. Stick to 50 if you can for close up shots
You can get two Lumix g7 with a lenses for $900
But then you have to use Panasonic color science 🤮 haha but I get it.
Hi Zephan, great job on the video and well explained! The ZVE10 with the lens do an amazing job but I can't afford it by now. I want to start streaming my DJ sets and I'm looking for an affordable and also a good 4K camera to use. I started recording my session practices with a a Gopro 10 but it cashed, I don't know what happened but it doesn't turn on again. I spent too much time trying everything and watching all the videos on RUclips and nothing work, the manufacture guarantee is expired as well so I'm done with it and decide to get a good camera for my streaming's in a rage of $500 which is my budget. I use OBS studio and a Focusrite 212 as an audio interface. Which camera would you recommend me to start doing a professional stream in my studio and outside? Also keeping in mind the camera overheat.
Thanks in advance.
Pablo
@@goodvibes9313 check out the Insta360 link. I like it as a 4K webcam and if you have decent lighting it performs really well.
@@zephanmoses Thank you for your suggestion and quick response!
Don't buy the ZV-E10 for streaming. Keeps overheating despite using EVERY SINGLE trick on RUclips
@@Jokeniv Hmm haven't had an issue on my end and I've been using mine for 2 years. Are you recording in camera too? Are you doing extended (all day) streaming?
I just bought this whole setup, what cord should I be connecting to the camera?
What are you trying to connect the camera to? The Rode Streamer X? If so, you'll need a HDMI Micro to full size HDMI cable like this: amzn.to/3z6bFaB
@@zephanmoses rode streamer in your video
@@teammvz1032 HDMI
@@zephanmoses so hdmi from camera into the rodex then hdmi from rode into pc ? Sorry for questions new to this
@@teammvz1032 the rode connects to the computer via USB-c. I recommend checking out the rode channel for some videos that explain it.
Great detailed explanation of your setup, thank you! One question, using your MV7 mic plugged into the XLR on the Rode Streamer x are there any sync timing issues between voice and lip movement which needs adjusting vs a mic with 3.5 jack straight into camera? Thanks
@@PureMonochrome no issues there.
Would you recommend the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN for someone wanting to film digital courses but who prefers to stand rather than sitting at a table?
I think it’s great for any talking head work. Sit or stand is fine. It’s the right depth of field and field of view for that. Most of my RUclips videos use that lens and it’s just mounted next to my computer screen.
So how would you say it differs from the Sigma 18-50 in terms of use cases? When is each more/most suitable?
@@ariblochpro the 18-50 is a kit lens with a slow aperture. It won’t give you a shallow depth of field and it’s not going to do as well unless the lighting scenario is near perfect. The f1.4 gives you the blurred out background look that most people want and it’s much sharper because it’s a prime lens.
@@zephanmoses interesting. Personally I have the Sony a7iv and use the Tamron 28-75 2.8 for video, mostly talking heads, and it is fine. But in this case researching which lens to recommend to a friend planning to get the ZV-e10 (also for talking heads like vlog and digital courses).
@@ariblochpro A 28-85 gives you more room to zoom but it's just the same to physically move the camera closer to the person or person closer to the camera. I find the 16mm is great for me only because I sit down at the same desk with the same setup every time. But if someone is operating the camera and will be constantly moving around or needing to adjust then obviously a zoom lens allows for more flexibility. It's just not nearly as much of a shallow depth at 2.8 vs. 1.4
So, using a Canon C200 is overkill?
I mean use what you have first and foremost. My main camera is a C70. But the ZVE10 has been perfect for streaming from home and smaller setups.
I can agree this is a great camera!
Ouch, that's not in my budget haha, at least all of the required gear would easily set me back $1200-$1500 here with taxes and bad currency. Have wanted to get into streaming and content creation, the PC is good enough and have pretty good video editing abilities (not on this channel) I guess I'll just start with what I have and upgrade if there's even some remote success!
I always tell people first and foremost to start with what they have, beyond that you can look at some decent webcams like the Obsbot or the Insta360 Link if you have $200-300 and use the free OBS software. But this video features the camera that a lot of home streamers are using for the best quality. There's definitely a big jump in quality and price going from a webcam to a mirrorless camera so this is the cheapest mirrorless I'd recommend.
@@zephanmoses Thank you for the reply and advice! I have spent upwards of $1400 on a camera before, it's just that it's obsolete now haha. And if the good webcams are $300-$400 the ZV-E10 is probably just worth selling some of the random stuff I collect to cover the additional cost as at least it's a multi-functional tool! Appreciate it!
What about overheating ?
@@Unhhrr haven’t had any issues. Since it’s AC powered and not using a battery it helps reduce heat. It’s also not recording in camera so that keeps the heat down too.
thank you so much for this video
700 dollars is a lot for a camera if your a normal streamer. 15k is like top photographer level and I am not even sure they need a camera like this.
@@Lightflames85 you won’t find a mirrorless camera for much cheaper. At that point you’ll be in the $300 range for certain webcams but you won’t find a camera that can take interchangeable lenses and blur out a background. The ZVE10 is commonly used by thousands of streamers now. It might be outside of your range but I typically am teaching professional videographers how to livestream if you look at the rest of my channel content so it’s well within the type of equipment price range we’re using and teaching here.
Hello Zephan, thanks for this very informative video! I want to buy a camera for my streaming setup and also want to use it for my RUclips Videos in the near future. Should I go with the Sony ZV-E10 like you do in this Video, but instead of the StreamerX I would use the Elgato Cam link or should I buy the Sony A6100 or 6400 or 6600 and use it with the cam link? Thanks for your answer and kind regards from Germany!
@@LEONallcaps there’s not much of a difference other than how much you spend 😉
@@zephanmoses thanks for the quick response!
The magic audio actually sounded terrible. I definitely think you're overhyping that prospect of it. But it's a great videon nonetheless. Very informative!
I do think there is an audience of people that want to switch from a webcam to an actual camera when it comes to streaming, and making a guide or video about how you set that up would be great. For instance, how would you go about connecting the ZV E10 and get it to record video for you in the best quality possible and how do you set that up on your computer?
Thanks for that. I have a video in the works on a setup I made for a news anchor who is using the camera to record live news hits for her work. It’s essentially the ZVE10 with a Rode Streamer X and a Blackmagic Video Assist. I’ll keep this in mind for the future!
Stranger Things, however was shot on,like, Alexa - since the later seasons :)
It’s a joke 😉
Dude! What budget do you think we have????? 🤦🏻♂️
I appreciate the comment but in today's day and age, the only option you have sub $600 for a decent camera with 4K capability is going to be using your smartphone or a $300 webcam. It's not reasonable to expect to do anything below that type of budget. For reference, a typical cinema camera that I use on my livestream costs $6000, requires a $4000 lens and has at least another $1000 in SD cards, batteries and accessories and that's before you put it on a tripod.
This industry is expensive, my channel aims to teach those who are intermediate or advanced professionals.
Man its a good camera on a budget but if you can afford it i think for streaming and content creation the sony a7iii is one of the best cameras i have ever tried. Sony is definitely the purveyor of the best cameras and lenses. Though i wish i had the money to afford the zv e10 because the a7iii belongs to my dad😂 this is also a good camera. This world is too expensive to live in when there are so many things that you want lol.
It’s not a cheap hobby 😅
But can you imagine just a small device which takes photos and records videos is at the price point of a thousand bucks? Honestly I just want to win a giveaway from some content creator to get some streaming equipment. In my country buying locally is even more of a nightmare because it's even more money. What XLR deck would you recommend and what mic would you recommend for streaming under $500 for both things combined if you can tell me.
@@District_keenu there’s plenty of cheap audio mixers but it depends how many inputs you need and what features you want. I use the Zoom livetrak L8 as my main mixer and also recently added in a Rodecaster. But you can find analog mixers from Behringer for like $80-100. As far as a mic that’s kind of a broad question. What kind of mic? Wireless lavalier? Wired? Shotgun mic? Every livestream event has different needs.
@@zephanmoses ok sorry for the vague question. I wanted a mic with a boom arm included. I can spend $300 on the Mackie dlz compact xs but the mic is the main issue. I cannot find anything good under $100
@@District_keenu typically a boom pole is sold separately. At that price you might need to look at the older Rode NTG microphones or maybe a used Deity mic.
u good bro ?
@@arda830 I think? Why do you ask?
@@zephanmoses you said budget huh 😂😂
@@arda830 professional videographers use cinema level cameras ranging from $3-10K so a $600 camera for the body is very reasonable.
You won’t find a mirrorless camera for less than that unless it’s used, or much older and especially not capable of doing 4K. You’d have to go the webcam route and then you’re losing shallow depth of field that you’d find in mirrorless cameras with larger sensors and interchangeable lenses, along with low light capabilities and overall quality of image.
So yea, when it comes to live streaming if you don’t have the budget, keep using your phone or the webcam built into your computer. Any 4K webcam worth using is going to cost you $200-300 (look up the Obsbot and Insta360 link) and even still the quality will look webcam-ish without a good lighting setup. That’s just how it is.
@@zephanmoses i didnt know the price for good camera so yeah you have a point sorry btw
16mm is a terrible focal length for talking head work, unless you stay wide and away. Get close and personal and I hope you and your guests like your noses thick. With an APS sensor, something like 50mm would be nice and will give you creamy backgrounds if you get a f/1.4 or something. Maybe a 35mm if don't get too close. But it's not gonna happen in a 5x5 feet room. Portrait photography requires distance
Portrait photography is different than videography. 16mm is a very commonly used lens on this style of APS-C camera and works just fine for all of my videos. All of my stuff is talking head, it’s close and personal (per your comments) and my nose is just fine thank you. A 35 on this sensor is going to be much closer to a 50 on a full frame which simply wouldn’t work in such a small space like the one I have and many others have for their home office setup. The 16mm comes out to about 24ish after the crop.
And for the record, my APS-C sensor and 16mm lens has been used on my RUclips for well over a year and a half and hasn’t prevented me from building a following or teaching others.
@@zephanmoses Sorry for writing like a dick. Your following is a testament to your efforts and to the quality of your material. Please keep my comment as a suggestion for improvement though. I understand that the tight space is a big restriction, but we better clarify this when making suggestions for equipment improvements, especially expensive ones. Videography or photography, the geometry of the image is the same for the same sensor. And the traditional minimum focal length for flattering shots is 85mm FF. A bit more than 55mm in an APS. Many pros even use huge teles. 16mm APS translates to something close to 24mm in terms of geometry. It can work for wider frames like upper torso shots, but for tighter head-shots the geometry distortion becomes more pronounced. I cannot post links, but if you search for the photo main-qimg-bf4bec815f0cf72e67cbbfd4ff10feed-lq on google you will see a very nice example in quora
@@dimitris470 I understand where an 85mm makes perfect sense for portraits. I’ve used the Canon 85mm on my other cameras for plenty of corporate video work and some headshot photos.
I was strictly speaking from the standpoint of a home streaming camera setup for use similar to my scenario. It’s not possible to make an all encompassing answer. If we’re looking at it from that perspective half the content on RUclips would be useless because there is no “best” it’s all subjective and what works for one won’t work for everyone. All we can do is choose what’s right for us and if it works, we can recommend it.
In all fairness, I use titles that work with the RUclips algorithm because people don’t search for “lens that works for 70% of people live streaming from home” they search for “best” or “cheapest” or “top”, so admittedly my titles and explanations are subjected to some scrutiny because I’m working with the algorithm here.
But again, people aren’t likely to be using a 50 or 85 for a home setup and if it’s a corporate streaming setup we’re usually leveraging zooms anyways because we have to accommodate adjusting our shots of conference speakers and presenters.
@@dimitris470 tell us you don't know about cameras without telling us lol. This is a good example where theoretical knowledge doesn't apply to practical knowledge
13 cameras... WTF?
@@bobbymoss6160 corporate high end events taking over an entire arena…
And he said budget camera but it cost 700 dollars 💀😂. But the quality is cool
@@docen67 you won’t find a mirrorless camera for much cheaper than $600-700. At that point you’re looking at a webcam. Just being realistic about what’s out there on the market. My corporate video work uses a $5000 camera and that’s before I add any lenses and accessories.
In case you’re new here on the channel I teach videographers and filmmakers how to live stream. If you’re looking for someone who teaches how do just do things cheap, I’m not your guy. I teach how to do things on a budget within my industry.
It’s like saying you could ride a bicycle from Washington DC to New York, sure you could do it, but a car makes a whole lot more sense. I’m recommending a Honda civic over a Porsche here.
an 800$ camera before the lens are you serious on the budget. dear lord that's not affordable .
@@MR_DOME the camera is $600 body only and my regular cinema camera is $6000. Even a decent 4K webcam these days will cost you $300 (look at the Obsbot and Insta360 link as examples). This Sony camera is a very affordable option. You won’t find a comparable mirrorless camera that allows for interchangeable lenses so that you can get the necessary depth of field for anything less than that. When you toss an F1.4 prime lens on this camera you cannot recreate a similar image with a webcam. It’s just not possible.
@@zephanmoses although I agree with the camera aspect although you can buy a used different model for less, this is in no way a budget video. Why? Because you really didn’t went for the budget part of anything. Let me give you an example. You chose a Shure MV7 for the mic. Is it budget? No, not even in Shure standards because the SM58 is just the same for a bit more than half the price. You just went with a slight cheaper SM7B but hey, it’s fancy. Guess what’s budget, a Behringer XM8500 which, surprise surprise, is almost as good as the SM7B and only a tiny percentage of users will notice the difference and it costs less than 1/3 of the MV7 and never in streaming.
The problem with videos claiming things being budget is the reality their creators.
To a person that buys a couple of Rolls Royce a Porsche is also a budget car… except it’s not.
First!!! 🤣
You got it!