The Buick 3800 is legendary! Known for its durability, smooth operation, and versatility, it’s a true icon in the engine world. Over its 30-year production run, it powered a wide range of vehicles and consistently proved its reliability, with many reaching 200,000 miles or more without major issues. Its fuel efficiency and power balance made it a standout among V6 engines. But as with all engines, it wasn't without a few quirks. Some early versions had intake manifold gasket issues, and like many older engines, it could develop coolant leaks over time. However, these minor issues never overshadowed its reputation for being one of the best engines ever made. If you're a fan of the Buick 3800 or have any stories about it, let us know in the comments! And for more great discussions on iconic American engines, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters-let's keep these memories alive together...
While the Buick 3800 certainly has its merits and a loyal fanbase, calling it one of the best engines ever built might be a bit of a stretch. This engine was known for reliability, yes, but it had its limitations, especially in terms of performance compared to other powerhouses from that era. Its power output and overall refinement were modest, and for true performance enthusiasts, it often fell short of expectations. Other engines, like the Ford 302 or Chevy LS series, offered a better balance of performance, durability, and aftermarket support, making them stronger contenders for the title of 'best ever.'
The Buick 3800 does indeed shine in its reliability, smooth operation, and remarkable fuel efficiency, making it a staple in the engine world for over three decades. While it's true the 3800 wasn’t necessarily designed for high performance compared to legends like the Ford 302 or Chevy LS, it carved out a different niche-serving as a reliable workhorse rather than a powerhouse. In fact, the 3800 earned its reputation in everyday driving, where its longevity and ease of maintenance made it a favorite among drivers who valued consistency. It was versatile too, powering everything from family sedans to sports coupes. Though it didn’t lead in horsepower, its balance of fuel economy, smooth operation, and durability gave it a legendary status, especially among V6 engines. Let's hear from you-do you agree, or do you have your own Buick 3800 stories? Drop a comment! And if you want more dives into the engines that powered American muscle and beyond, be sure to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters. Let’s keep the conversation going and celebrate these icons together...
the 3800 is not a bad engine. I mean... everyone knows its good so idk what you are talking about. I also had one so I know first hand that its bulletproof.
@@kylersmith5551 The 3800 is indeed a powerhouse of reliability, and you're right-it's known for being incredibly durable, with many fans considering it nearly bulletproof! Many people have had great experiences, especially with its balance of performance and longevity. But alongside that, like any engine, it’s not without a few common issues that can crop up over time. Some 3800s, especially in later series, have been known to have issues with intake manifold gaskets and coolant leaks. However, many of these are manageable with regular maintenance. Thank you for sharing your firsthand experience! It’s always valuable to hear directly from enthusiasts who’ve been behind the wheel. And hey, if anyone else has a 3800 story or insight, drop it in the comments! Let’s keep this discussion going. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more in-depth looks at classic engines and muscle car lore!
While the 3800 is known for its durability and has a solid reputation, it's not without its issues-especially in certain models and under specific conditions. Some owners have experienced intake manifold gasket problems and issues with plastic coolant elbows. It's a great engine in many respects, but like any, it has its quirks. Sounds like you had a good experience, though, which is awesome...
The 3800 engine is a fantastic example of a well-engineered powerplant that delivers on both performance and reliability. Known for its solid construction and resilience, it’s earned its reputation as one of GM’s most dependable engines, particularly for its smooth power delivery and fuel efficiency. But as you pointed out, no engine is entirely perfect. Intake manifold gasket issues and those pesky plastic coolant elbows are indeed common challenges, especially in Series II models. Thankfully, these quirks are well-known in the community, and there are durable aftermarket solutions available that help mitigate these issues. Regular maintenance can also go a long way in keeping the 3800 running smoothly and extending its already impressive lifespan. Thank you so much for sharing your experience! Your story adds real value to the discussion. To everyone watching, if you've got a 3800 tale-good or bad-share it below! And if you’re enjoying these deep dives, be sure to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more insights and stories that celebrate the engines and legends of the American muscle era.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 Sure, I get why the 3800 has fans-it’s durable and efficient for many. But I’ve found it to be a bit overrated, especially when comparing its performance to other engines in GM’s lineup. The intake manifold gasket and coolant elbow issues aren’t minor; they’re recurring headaches that can lead to costly repairs if ignored. While aftermarket solutions help, they shouldn’t be necessary if the original design was up to par. It’s a solid engine, but I think its reputation sometimes overshadows some clear flaws. Curious if anyone else has experienced similar issues or has had a different take?
Why isn’t the Chevy Vega mentioned? I became a pro at replacing its head gasket. That engine kept me busy, and I mastered the skill! The Vega was infamous for its issues, especially with the head gasket. It was a challenge, but it taught me a lot about repairs. Seems like it deserves a spot in the discussion for memorable engine experiences.
While the Vega’s issues with the head gasket were definitely notorious, it seems like engines like the Northstar or the Cummins with the killer dowel pin deserve a bit more attention here. Those engines brought challenges on an entirely different scale-think costly repairs and the potential for total engine failures. Compared to these, the Vega’s head gasket replacements, though frustrating, feel like more manageable issues. So maybe the focus should be on the engines that presented bigger risks and headaches for owners.
The Chevy Vega had its fair share of engine troubles, especially with that infamous head gasket issue, which kept a lot of DIYers like yourself busy. The Vega’s aluminum block without iron sleeves and its unique cooling challenges certainly made it memorable in terms of repairs and durability lessons. Many mechanics from that era probably honed their head gasket skills thanks to this engine alone! But you hit the nail on the head about memorable engine experiences-it’s about the scale and complexity of the problems too. Engines like the Northstar or Cummins with the “killer dowel pin” often involved higher-stakes failures and much costlier repairs. In the Vega’s case, even though replacing the head gasket was a recurring pain, it typically didn’t spell total disaster the way some other engines did. Still, it’s a great call to bring up the Vega here because it represents a classic era of hands-on learning for car lovers. We’d love to hear more stories like this! If anyone else has memorable engine experiences, or stories of overcoming notorious repairs, share them here. And remember to comment, share, and subscribe for more on classic car engines and the wild stories behind them.
@@KeithGreene-k1v "While it's true that engines like the Northstar and Cummins had their fair share of high-stakes issues, I’d argue that the Vega’s head gasket problem still stands out for a few reasons. The Vega was notorious because the issue was practically guaranteed to occur-meaning nearly every owner had to deal with it. This wasn’t just a ‘risk’ but almost a certainty, and it happened at a time when Chevy was pushing for innovation with an aluminum block that ultimately fell short. For those who owned one, the constant repairs made the Vega memorable, even if the cost was lower. It wasn't just a repair; it was an ongoing saga, and that's what made it infamous.
Honestly, I think the Vega's head gasket issues were actually kind of overblown compared to some of the real problem engines out there. Sure, it was a hassle, but it didn’t have the high-stakes, catastrophic potential of the Northstar’s infamous head bolt issues or the Cummins 'killer dowel pin' problem. Those engines were ticking time bombs that could take out the entire engine if things went wrong, costing way more in repairs. The Vega was a hassle, no doubt, but at least you knew what you were dealing with-it wasn't like the gamble of a complete engine failure. If anything, it’s these higher-stakes engines that deserve more of the spotlight for their risk factor and repair bills.
@@KeithGreene-k1v Actually, I have to side with you on this one-the Vega's head gasket issue was practically a guarantee, not just a possibility, and that alone makes it infamous in a way that the Northstar and Cummins can't quite match. Those engines had their "ticking time bomb" moments, sure, but with the Vega, every single owner knew they'd be dealing with that head gasket at some point. Chevy’s push for an aluminum block was ambitious, but it just wasn’t up to the task. It wasn’t just a repair; it was almost a rite of passage for Vega owners, a saga you couldn’t avoid, and that level of inevitability is exactly why it’s still so memorable in the car community.
The only problems I ever encountered with the 3800 were the intake gaskets leaking and the plastic cooling elbows for the heater hoses. Once you replaced those 2 items, you head an incredibly reliable engine that had good power and awesome fuel economy for its time. As far as crankshaft sensors failing, the 3800 was not the only engine with that problem, and it was an easy, inexpensive repair. Despite this video bashing the 3800, it was one of GMs best engines since the small block V8.
Y’all are missing the point The 3800 earned its respect yeah, plastic elbows and intake gaskets were headaches, but once fixed? Bulletproof. GM nailed reliability and efficiency here. Compared to today’s complex messes, the 3800 is simple, strong, and proven....lol...
The GM 2.2 OHV was reliable.Same with the 3100,Fel Pro and Dorman came out with upgraded intake manifold gaskets made out of metal to fix the intake manifold gasket problem.That Jaguar V12,lot of them were yanked out replaced with a 350 Chevy.The GM 2.5 was good
You're absolutely right about the GM 2.2 OHV and the 3100 engines Both earned a reputation for reliability once that notorious intake manifold gasket issue was addressed. Props to Fel-Pro and Dorman for stepping up with those upgraded metal gaskets-proof that the aftermarket world knows how to solve problems! The Jaguar V12 swaps are a classic story, with many owners opting for the bulletproof Chevy 350 for its simplicity and power. As for the GM 2.5 'Iron Duke,' it was an unsung hero-rugged, efficient, and a go-to workhorse for many GM vehicles. We love hearing stories like this! Muscle cars are all about ingenuity and passion. Got more experiences or knowledge to share? Drop them in the comments! Don’t forget to share this video and hit that subscribe button to join the American Muscle Cars family. See you in the next video, and have a fantastic day
While many muscle car fans dismiss GM's smaller engines, the 2.2 OHV and 2.5 Iron Duke were underrated workhorses. They offered durability and easy maintenance. The 3100 V6 improved reliability with upgraded Fel Pro gaskets. Unlike temperamental Jaguar V12s swapped for Chevy 350s, these engines earned their keep with simplicity and dependability over raw power.
Thank you for your comment. GM's 3800 V6 is one of the most dependable engines ever made. It’s a testament to solid engineering, delivering both performance and reliability for decades. Whether it was in a Buick Regal, Pontiac Bonneville, or even the Grand National, this engine proved its worth with millions of loyal fans like you! From the Series I to the supercharged Series II, the 3800 had the muscle to power through the miles and keep going strong. And for those who gave it the right care? Forget about failures-it was practically unstoppable! We’d love to hear more about your experiences with the 3800. What models were they in, and do you have a favorite memory? Let’s keep this gearhead conversation rolling! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engine talk and classic car content. Hope to see you in the next video-have an amazing weekend....
That engine’s a legend in its own right. Sure, it ain’t a high-revving small block or a big, throaty V8, but the 3800 is bulletproof I’ve seen ‘em go 300k miles without missing a beat. They’re torquey, reliable, and a sleeper gem in cars like the Grand Prix GTP. You think American Muscle is just about horsepower? Reliability and longevity gotta count for something, too
@@AilaniMadden GM's 3800 V6 deserves legendary status for its reliability and longevity. No engine is truly indestructible, but with proper care, the 3800 has proven it can outlast many. Its torque and versatility made it a hidden gem in cars like the Grand Prix GTP and Buick Regal. From supercharged power to daily dependability, this engine struck a perfect balance. What’s your favorite 3800-powered ride or memory? Let’s celebrate these unsung heroes together! Comment below, share this video, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome car conversations. See you in the next one
Y’all are overlooking what makes the 3800 special. Sure, the plastic elbows and intake gaskets were a pain, but fix those and you’ve got an engine that’s rock solid.
@@AilaniMadden Absolutely, Ailani! You make a great point about the 3800 engine. While the plastic elbows and intake gaskets were known weaknesses, once those issues are addressed, this engine really shines. Its reputation for reliability, longevity, and low-maintenance needs is hard to beat. The 3800 has powered some incredible cars, and it’s often underrated when compared to some of the bigger, more famous V8s. Whether in the supercharged Grand Prix GTP or the smooth-running Buick Regal, it has proven itself as a dependable, capable powerhouse. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, and I’d love to hear more memories from others
There’s nothing wrong with a 305 engine. The ‘78 to 79 engines lacked power big time. I installed a 4 barrel system off a worn 350 and perked it up. I also had an 85 GMC with 305 4 barrel I purchased new the engine was 10 years old before it gave any trouble
Thank you for your comment. The 305 engine often gets an unfair reputation, but as you pointed out, with a little tweaking, it can hold its own. Adding a 4-barrel system from a 350 is a classic move-proving once again that a little ingenuity can wake up any small block. Your experience with the '85 GMC speaks volumes about the 305's durability. Running strong for a decade without issues shows it was built to last, especially when cared for properly. The late '70s engines were indeed choked by emissions regulations, but with upgrades like yours, they had the potential to shine. Stories like these remind us why muscle car enthusiasts keep these engines alive and roaring. Thanks for sharing your insights-keep ‘em coming! Everyone, let’s hear your stories, mods, and favorite memories. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. See you in the next video-keep the muscle alive.
The 305 was as reliable as at 3:50 was it just has as much horsepower. Everybody I was a small block Chevys ran forever and ever with very little maintenance so I don’t know where they got this idea from.
@@tomtaylor7484 Hey, thanks again for your comment! You’re absolutely right, the 305 small block often gets overlooked, but it's definitely capable when treated right. Your experience with the '85 GMC proves that these engines can be reliable workhorses, lasting for years with minimal maintenance. It’s all about the right care and a few tweaks, like the 4-barrel upgrade, to really unleash that potential. We know that the emission restrictions of the '70s and '80s didn’t do these engines any favors, but with the right mods, they’re ready to roar. Thanks for sharing your story. Everyone, drop your thoughts, mods, and memories in the comments, and don’t forget to share and subscribe to keep the muscle car legacy alive See you in the next video...
@@williampowell2722 Hey, thanks for sharing your story about the '82 Chevy Over 400k miles is a true testament to how tough those engines can be when treated right. Like I said before, the 305 small block may not get all the love, but it’s a workhorse. Emission restrictions held it back, but with proper care and a few upgrades like a 4-barrel carb these engines prove they’ve got staying power. Keep those memories coming, and if you’ve got more tips or mods, drop them in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to keep the American muscle car spirit alive. See you soon, have a great day....
Chevrolet 2300 4 cylinder built from 1971-1977. Aluminum block with a steel cylinder head, and no steel cylinder liners. My grandfather had a Vega wagon with one, then my dad had it, and his mechanic said get rid of it as soon as possible.
Thank you so much for sharing your family’s connection to the Chevrolet 2300 engine! It’s incredible how cars often carry stories across generations. The aluminum block with a steel head was an innovative choice, but it lacked steel cylinder liners, which led to durability concerns especially with improper maintenance or neglect. The Vega's engine earned a reputation for overheating and oil consumption, which mechanics at the time often warned against. However, it’s worth noting that GM tried to address these issues later, with better cooling systems and improved materials, though the damage to the Vega's reputation had already been done. Some enthusiasts have even rebuilt these engines successfully using aftermarket upgrades to overcome the original flaws. Let’s hear from others did anyone have better luck with this engine? Share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more car history and discussions
Sure, no liners was risky, but it paved the way for innovation. With proper maintenance and updates, these engines could last. My uncle had one, and he swore by it for years.
Alright, hear me out, fellow gearheads: everyone dogs on the Chevy Vega’s 2300 4-cylinder, calling it a disaster. But let’s get real, it was ahead of its time! An aluminum block with no steel liners? That’s cutting-edge engineering for the early ’70s. Sure, it had issues, but with proper maintenance and cooling upgrades, it wasn’t hopeless. My grandfather’s Vega wagon ran fine for years. It’s not a V8 monster, but respect it as a stepping stone in GM’s innovation journey...
@@AilaniMadden Thank you for sharing such a thoughtful perspective on the Chevy Vega's 2300 engine You're absolutely righ, it was cutting-edge for its time, and GM's choice to innovate with an aluminum block showed real ambition, even if it had its pitfalls. Stories like your grandfather’s Vega wagon remind us how proper care could make these engines reliable. Many enthusiasts today even restore and modify them, proving they weren’t hopeless. Let’s hear from others-did you or your family have a Vega or a similar experience? Drop your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars....
I had a Buick Enclave with the 3.6 litre VVT engine. It was horrible! I ended up having it replaced with a junkyard motor. Even with the newer engine, i was still afraid to ever push. We had sooo many problems with that car! Oh, and as far as the Buick 3800 goes, the later engines were some of the best ever made. But, the old even fire 3.8's were terrible. They were notorious for blowing out the bottom of the motor after 100000 miles.
Thanks for sharing your experience! The 3.6L VVT in the Enclave has been a mixed bag for many. Timing chain issues and oil consumption have frustrated owners, but with proper care, some have had better luck. As for the Buick 3800, you're spot-on! The Series II and III engines are legendary for reliability and power, even rivaling V8s in some builds. The early even-fire 3.8s, though, were a learning curve-prone to bottom-end failures if pushed too hard. Let’s keep this conversation going-comment your favorite engines, share with fellow enthusiasts, and subscribe for more Muscle Car stories. Hope to see you next videos. Have a good day...
Note on the 3.1 GM V6 the intake manifold gasket did not become a problem until they converted from Green coolant to Dex Cool Orange. Prior to that those engines would last hundreds and thousands of miles with minimal issue had a 94 with that engine that lasted over 300 K with the last 25k being quite abused because of loaning it to a family member before it gave out contrast that with a 96 model of the same car with the same engine and because the intake gasket issue the original engine went to put at 120 k and even trying to rehab it with a new gasket the initial damage did enough damage that I had to replace the engine in a few more months anyway. But the gasket only became a problem when they went to DexCool orange long life antifreeze. If you take the regular green stuff and change it at the proper intervals that engine will last for a very long time.
You're absolutely right about the 3.1 GM V6 That engine was a workhorse with green coolant, but DexCool sure brought its headaches. The intake gasket failures became a nightmare after the switch, with many engines like yours falling victim early. It’s a great reminder that maintenance and proper fluids make all the difference. Thanks for sharing your story-it's a testament to how well these engines can perform when treated right. Let’s hear more stories like this from all of you Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day
Gm 3800 is one of the best engines out there and the 2.2 my racing group has had over 80 of them in cavaliers sunfires etc and are one of our favourite race cars only ever had transmission issues
the GM 3800 is a legendary engine, known for its incredible reliability and smooth power delivery. The 2.2, especially in Cavaliers and Sunfires, has earned respect for its performance in the racing community. It's amazing your group has run over 80 of them! Transmission issues can be tricky, but it’s a testament to these engines that they keep pushing hard regardless. Share your favorite racing moments with these cars-we’d love to hear! And to everyone watching, drop your comments, hit that like button, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day...
The main issues my friends encountered with the 3800 were leaking intake gaskets and the plastic cooling elbows for the heater hoses. Once those were replaced, the engine was incredibly reliable, offering solid power and impressive fuel economy for its time. Crankshaft sensor failures happened on other engines too and were an easy, affordable fix.
@@AilaniMadden Thanks for sharing your experience the 3800 engine is a beast when it comes to reliability, and those common issues like intake gasket leaks and the plastic cooling elbows are something many people overlook. It’s great that your friends had those sorted out, and it’s awesome to hear about the engine’s performance and fuel economy. It’s also interesting that crankshaft sensor failures popped up across other engines, but as you mentioned, they're a quick and easy fix. To all our viewers, drop your thoughts, share your experiences, and let’s keep the conversation going! Don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video, have a great day
Thank you for your comment and for highlighting the importance of regular maintenance You’re absolutely right many engines, including the Ford 3.8L, could deliver solid performance with proper care. However, like all engines, they had their quirks. For example, the Ford 3.8L was notorious for head gasket issues, especially in the early '90s, which often arose if routine maintenance wasn’t meticulous. The GM 305 and the 3800 V6 also had their strengths and weaknesses. The 305, while not a powerhouse, was a reliable and fuel-efficient option, while the 3800 earned its reputation as one of GM’s most dependable V6 engines, even spawning a supercharged version for more spirited performance. The key takeaway? Proper care can make or break an engine’s legacy. Let’s keep the conversation going! Share your experiences with these engines, and don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more insights....
Yes, even Ford's 3.8, despite the head gasket issues, held its own when well-maintained. Not every engine needs to be a fire-breathing monster to earn respect in the muscle car world
Oh, those 3100/3400 intake gaskets-what a nightmare You’re absolutely right; those things caused more headaches than they should have. GM's design flaws with the plastic intake gaskets led to coolant and oil mixing disasters, often wrecking engines before their time. It wasn’t just frustrating-it was a wallet drainer for countless owners. The upgraded metal gaskets helped later on, but by then, the damage to the 3100/3400’s reputation was already done. For anyone dealing with these engines, always look for the revised gaskets and check the coolant regularly to avoid costly repairs. Thank you for sharing your experience-it’s stories like yours that keep the muscle car community alive and kicking
Who does the research for this list? I've been an ASE Certified Master Tech and Diagnostician for over 30 years. I read everything I can to stay up-to-date in the industry. Many of these engines on this list are not engineering failures as many of them functioned as intended over the lifespan they were designed for. The GM 2.2L was meant to be a low cost, low powered economy engine for economy cars with a projected life of 100k miles. Most only saw major issues when reaching higher mileage(150k+) or owners didn't perform maintenance at semi-regular intervals. The same could be said of the famously long-lasting Iron Duke. The GM 3800 was a great engine, especially the Series II. The only real issue the 3800 had was extremely badly designed and produced intake manifold gaskets. Once you replaced them, the engine was one of the best engines GM ever made. The exact same can be said for its predecessors as far as bad intake gaskets and great longevity in the 3.3L and the 3.1L. And I'm not a fan of GM. GM has built some duds, yes, but not most of the ones on this list. The Cadillac 8-6-4 was a dud as was the Northstar with it's leaking, split block and horrendously difficult to change water pump. The 307ci V8 was an underpowered, vacuum hose nightmare of an engine. All manufacturers have built some duds and sone great engines. ALL engines that are mass produced will and do have design flaws and common points of failure. But if it's a parts manufacturing failure and not an engine design failure, such as GM's fiber plastic intake gaskets, I don't believe you should condemn the engine design as a failure. The Chrysler 2.7L V6 was a design failure in that it had a badly designed and prone-to-leak water pump that was timing chain driven so thus encased behind the timing cover. When the badly designed water pump failed, it would leak all the engine coolant into the oil sump(oil pan) and cause main/rod bearing failure due to lack of lubrication. That's an example of engine design failure. Do your research before making these lists. Ask people who have been in the industry for decades. Don't just read someone's anecdotal evidence based on their personal issues with an engine. Ask the professionals.
Thanks for your detailed comment Your insights as an ASE Certified Master Tech bring great depth to the discussion. You’re absolutely right-many engines labeled "failures" served their purpose when properly maintained. The GM 3800, especially the Series II, is a legendary workhorse once intake gaskets were addressed. Similarly, the Iron Duke proved its worth in longevity and economy. We aim to engage enthusiasts like you, balancing technical facts with broader perspectives. Your point on distinguishing design failures (like the Chrysler 2.7L's infamous water pump issue) from parts failures is spot-on! Feedback like this helps refine our research, ensuring we honor both engineering triumphs and lessons learned. Keep sharing your knowledge-it enriches our community! To all viewers, comment below with your experiences, share with fellow gearheads, and hit subscribe to join the Muscle Car Masters family. Hope to see you in our next video. Have a great day, everyone
Respectfully, I think you’re missing the big picture here. Many engines were great for what they were designed for. Take the Iron Duke cheap, reliable, and ran forever if maintained. Even ‘duds’ like the 8 6 4 showed innovation, just poorly executed. It’s not always the design; sometimes, it’s maintenance or expectations that lead to failure.
@AilaniMadden I am VERY familiar with the various designs and modern innovations of the internal combustion engine as well as newer vehicle EV technology. I've been an ASE Certified Master Tech and Master Diagnostician for over 30 years. I've dealt with all these engines numerous times.
@@knowplay3258 Respectfully, I hear you, but dismissing engines like the 8 6 4 overlooks their potential. GM aimed for efficiency in an era of tightening emissions ambitious for its time. Poor execution doesn’t erase the innovative thinking behind it. Sometimes, innovation stumbles before it soars. Muscle cars thrive on bold risks, even when they miss the mark initially.
@AilaniMadden You seem to have gotten me wrong. I defend many of the motors in the video as not being the badly designed engines and failures the video claims. I have no issue with innovation..with purpose. But, innovation simply for the sake of innovation tends to NOT further any part of engine design. Rather, it tends to waste time and resources. Sometimes, newly innovative engines are a boon to the automotive industry, other times they become the bane of the same industry. The 8 6 4 engine was a bane that cost consumers millions for a virtually untested design..it was rushed and not fully tested to the extent other designs are normally. In later years, we've seen successful attempts of the same technology from Chrysler/Stellantis/FCA with their MDS and GM with both their AFM and DoD systems. All as a result of the lessons learned from the catastrophic failure that was the 8-6-4.
You're dead wrong about the GM 2.2,2.5 and 3800. 2.2 is a good economic engine as is the 2.5 "Iron Duke" is a great economic engine mail trucks use them. And the 3800 is one of the best engines of all time.
Thank you for your passionate response and for sharing your perspective! The GM 2.2, 2.5 'Iron Duke,' and 3800 V6 certainly have their merits, especially in reliability and efficiency. The 2.5 'Iron Duke' was a workhorse, powering everything from mail trucks to compact cars, and the 3800 is undeniably a legend renowned for its durability and versatility in applications ranging from family sedans to supercharged performance models. That said, as with any engine, they had their quirks. For example, the 2.2 sometimes faced head gasket issues, and the 3800 had occasional intake manifold problems in later versions. Still, their overall legacy speaks volumes. We'd love to hear more from fans-what’s your experience with these engines? Share your stories, comment, and let’s keep the discussion alive. Don’t forget to subscribe and share with fellow enthusiasts to keep American Muscle Cars thriving...
The GM 2.2 and 2.5 are reliable, sure, but calling them great is a stretch. Mail trucks used the Iron Duke because it was cheap and simple-not powerful. As for the 3800, it’s solid for daily drivers, but 'best engine of all time'? Not in the muscle car world. Give me a screaming V8 like the 289 HiPo or the mighty 426 Hemi any day
Wow, a 1990 Beretta GTZ with the Quad 4 That’s a gem from the era when GM was pushing the boundaries of small displacement performance. The Quad 4 was no joke, boasting up to 180 horsepower in HO form-a big deal for a naturally aspirated 4-cylinder back then. Its DOHC design and robust build made it a force on the streets, earning respect for its power-to-weight ratio and reliability when well-maintained. It’s awesome to hear yours treated you so well-sounds like you got a solid one. To everyone reading, do you have Quad 4 stories or know someone who rocked a Beretta GTZ? Let us know in the comments, share your experiences, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Let’s keep the conversation rolling. Hope to see you in our next video, stay passionate about muscle and classics, and have a fantastic day
I had a Chevy beretta GT with the 3100. That little engine was the truth. I was easily able to stay on a mustang GT with the 4.6 butt. I also had a Buick Enclave with the 3.6 engine. It was the truth too but the water pump did fail about 110,000 miles. Luckily I had an extended warranty that covered the cost. 11 years old I hit the gas it still will break the tires loose and leave rubber on the road. Had me a 2001 Monte Carlo SS with the 3800 in it. I loved that engine as well. I actually turbocharged that engine and upgraded drivetrain components. I had 600hp going to the front wheels. The car was swift lol. I regret getting rid of that car and it was a rare color too
Wow, you’ve had quite the lineup of legendary GM engines That 3100 in the Beretta GT punching above its weight against a Mustang GT? Respect! The 3.6 in the Buick Enclave has always been a powerhouse for its size, even with the common water pump issue. Good thing that warranty came through because an 11-year-old SUV still breaking tires loose? That’s saying something Now, that 3800 in your Monte Carlo SS - turbocharged with 600hp to the front wheels? Absolute beast mode! The 3800 is one of GM’s most underrated engines, and your setup sounds like it was built for pure thrill. Rare color too? You must miss that one for sure Folks, let us know about your favorite GM rides in the comments. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Stay tuned for more! Hope to see you in the next video, and have an awesome day
I had a Cavalier Z24 with the 3.1 and that was a fast car and got great mileage with no issues up to 175K when I traded it in on my Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8L Series II and drove that car to 250K until it rusted out and I got rid of it. Regular maintenance and not beating on it all the time will get you great life out of these engines.
@@johnkaltinger3922 Great, you've got a real knack for picking legendary GM rides! The 3.1 in your Cavalier Z24 was a workhorse with surprising speed and efficiency. Trading up to the Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8L Series II? That engine is an absolute icon, delivering smooth power and reliability for a quarter-million miles-impressive! Regular maintenance and smart driving really do wonders, and your story proves these engines can go the distance. The 3800, especially in the Monte Carlo SS, deserves more love. Its versatility, from commuter cars to turbocharged monsters, is unmatched. GM nailed it with this platform Folks, share your stories in the comments what GM rides left their mark on your life? Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead tales and legendary engines. Thanks for watching, and stay awesome! Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day, everyone...
I owned 3 Rx7s with the 1.3 ltr rotary engine, and drove them hard. No problems following recommended service under warranty. I added engine flush before every 3 - 4 oil changes, that freed rotor tips from gumming up. Auto trany on one car gave out at 105,000 mi.
Great to hear from someone with hands-on experience with the RX-7's rotary engine! The 1.3L rotary is definitely a unique beast, and you nailed it with the engine flush strategy - that’s a great tip to keep those rotor tips clean and prevent buildup that can cause issues down the road. Following the recommended maintenance schedule under warranty definitely makes a difference with rotary engines, as they have different needs than standard piston engines. It's interesting that your auto transmission made it to 105,000 miles, especially with how hard you drove it - that’s pretty solid for an RX-7! Rotary engines tend to handle high RPMs well, but it’s the transmission that often feels the wear and tear, especially with aggressive driving. To everyone watching, if you’ve had similar experiences or tips on maintaining unique engines like the rotary, drop a comment below! We love hearing your insights on keeping these classic machines running smoothly. Don't forget to share and subscribe to keep the conversation going about these legendary cars!
Honestly, I'm with you on the RX-7's rotary being more reliable than people give it credit for. I ran three RX-7s myself, stuck to regular maintenance, and didn’t run into any of the catastrophic failures people love to talk about. The rotary gets a bad rap, but it's all about upkeep. Engine flush every so often? Totally agree - keeps things running smooth and prevents those rotor tips from sticking. And hey, 105K out of the auto tranny? Not bad at all for a car everyone thinks will break down at half that mileage...
@@KeithGreene-k1v Absolutely, you’re right on the money about the rotary engine - maintenance is the real secret to keeping it running strong! The Mazda RX-7’s rotary often gets misunderstood, but as you’ve shown, regular upkeep like engine flushes can go a long way in preserving those rotor seals and keeping the engine humming along smoothly. Rotary engines naturally produce more heat, which can lead to carbon buildup, but by sticking to a solid maintenance plan, many owners - just like you - enjoy years of reliable performance. The automatic transmission lasting 105,000 miles is impressive! Rotary engines put unique stress on the transmission due to the high-revving nature of the engine, so it's great to hear that Mazda engineering held up to that kind of demand. Plus, it’s a testament to how durable these cars can be if they’re treated right. For everyone watching, we’d love to hear your experiences with rotary engines or other unique setups you’ve maintained over the years! Let’s keep the discussion alive - drop a comment below, share this video with fellow enthusiasts, and make sure to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more tips and insights on keeping these classic engines alive and well. Thanks for being part of our community!
@@garrypritchard1658 I get it, the rotary engine gets a ton of flak, and sure, they’re not everyone’s cup of tea. But let’s be real - a rotary isn’t just some quirky Mazda gimmick; it’s a marvel when maintained properly. The whole “rotary clothesline” joke? Funny, but it doesn’t do justice to what these engines can achieve. I’ve had mine go past 100K miles with regular care, which isn’t the disaster many claim. Sure, it’s not a V8, but it wasn’t designed to be one. It’s an entirely different beast-compact, high-revving, and more reliable than people give it credit for.
The current Ford 1.0L Exoboost is currently causing owners of the Fiesta, Ecosport, and Focuses major headaches with 393,000 under recall because of oil pump failures. There is no current time line for when Ford will be able to effect repairs.
Ford’s 1.0L EcoBoost engine has been a real headache for many owners, with oil pump failures putting over 393,000 vehicles under recall. It’s frustrating for enthusiasts to see modern engines face these kinds of issues, especially when we think back to the rock-solid reliability of classic American muscle cars. Those old-school V8s could take a beating and still keep roaring down the road! For fans of power and durability, this is why the muscle car era remains unmatched-engines like the 427, 289 HiPo, or the Boss 429 were built to last and deliver raw, untamed performance. Thank you and Have a good day.
You fell off at the 305 and the 3.8l😅 The block of the 305 is still sought after to this day for racing builds and the 3.8 is still running strong in different cities that I've worked in. Other than that this is a great video
Thanks for sharing your thoughts You're absolutely right-both the 305 and the 3.8L have more to them than meets the eye. The 305's small bore and long stroke make it a favorite for racers looking to build high-revving engines, especially in classes where displacement is restricted. And that 3.8L V6? It’s a legend in its own right. From powering Buick Grand Nationals to still hauling in taxis and daily drivers, it’s proof that GM got some things very right. We appreciate your kind words about the video! It’s fans like you who keep this community alive, sharing insights and keeping the passion for American Muscle Cars burning strong. Let us know what you’d like to see next-your input shapes this channel. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe for more muscle car stories and discussions. Hope to see you in the next video Have a fantastic day
Hey man, gotta respectfully disagree about the 305 and 3.8 being a fall-off. The 305 small block is a legend in the sleeper build world, perfect base for stroker kits, and it's lightweight. As for the 3.8, it’s bulletproof! Buick Grand National made it iconic, and I’ve seen those engines turbocharged to outrun V8s.
@@AilaniMadden thanks for your awesome input the 305 and 3.8L have their own legendary status. The 305’s versatility in sleeper builds and its lightweight design make it a gem for creative enthusiasts, while the 3.8L V6 has carved its place in history, especially with the Buick Grand National showcasing its turbocharged prowess. It’s insights like yours that keep this community thriving! What’s your favorite sleeper build or turbo mod story? Share it below-we’d love to feature more in future content. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead discussions. Have a good day.
Thanks for sharing that story-it's a classic example of the Oldsmobile Diesel's infamous issues! Many owners dealt with hard-starting problems due to design flaws like the weak injection pump and glow plug systems. GM rushed these engines to market, and while they had potential, poor execution hurt their reputation. Did your uncle ever consider retrofitting it with a gas V8 or modifying the fuel system? We'd love to hear more Let us know your own experiences with tricky engines in the comments below. Don’t forget to share, subscribe, and keep the muscle car spirit alive! Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day
He Oldsmobile early V8 diesel engines. Yes we’re very big problem, by 1981 with the DX block and upgraded head bolts and injection pump. They were quite a reliable vehicle, but by that time they got such a bad reputation nobody bought them.
@@tomtaylor7484 Thanks for sharing your insights on the Oldsmobile V8 diesel. the time the 1981 DX block and upgraded components came along, the damage to its reputation had already been done. The early models suffered from those significant design flaws, including the problematic injection pumps and weak glow plug systems. It's unfortunate because, with proper refinement, they had the potential to be solid engines. I'd love to hear more about any modifications or personal experiences you've had with them Keep the comments coming, share the videos, and subscribe for more classic American muscle car content! We’re all about preserving these legends. Thanks again, and I look forward to hearing more
I had exactly the same problem (engine not starting when pointed downhill) with my 1979 olds Delta 88, my 1981 Old Delta 88, and my 1982 Olds Cutlass. I don't remember any problems with my 1981 GMC pickup diesel. I loved the fuel mileage and I loved the sound of awesome power inside the cabin. They didn't have awesom power, but they sounded like they did. Outside, the cars sounded like a bucket of bolts, but inside you only heard the low frequency rumble of the V8. I bought them used for very low prices. I wish I could have kept at least one of them for an occasional drive. The sound of the engine was the best of all my 25 cars except my 1964 Corvette fastback. I removed the 327/300HP engine w/Powerglide and installed a 409/409HP V8 with 2 Carter AFB carbs and B&M rebuilt Chevrolet truck 4 speed hydramatic. At low throttle, it ran on only 2 barrels,. But when I floored the gas peddle, opening the other 6 barrels , the engine sounded like it was going to inhale the trees on both sides of the road.
@@dessertfox3263 Thank you for sharing such an awesome story Those Oldsmobiles and that epic Corvette swap are a real tribute to the golden age of American muscle and ingenuity. It’s amazing how those V8s could create such a symphony inside the cabin while roaring like beasts on the outside. Your 409/409HP setup must have been a dream-true muscle car magic And you're absolutely right, every engine has its quirks, but that’s part of their charm. To all our fans: what are your favorite muscle car memories? Let’s hear them in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars... Have a good day.
You missed the worst engine series ever built the Ford Powerstroke 6.0L and 6.4L diesel engines. They are notorious for having to be rebuilt between 35,000 and 50,000 miles. The rebuilds cost $35,000 to $52,000 to fix the design flaws and make them reliable. My friend got burned by both engines in his F450 trucks.
These engines were plagued by design flaws like head gasket failures, oil cooler issues, and EGR problems. Ford tried to address them, but many owners ended up "bulletproofing" their engines, which involved costly upgrades like ARP head studs, upgraded oil coolers, and aftermarket EGR deletes. The 6.0L, in particular, became infamous for its reliability issues, leaving truck owners frustrated. The 6.4L, while offering better power, didn’t fare much better due to fuel system failures and excessive soot buildup. That said, these engines have become a cautionary tale in diesel truck history. Thanks for bringing this up-it’s always great to discuss these stories. Let us know what other engines or vehicles you’d like us to cover. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day.
I definitely do not disagree with you, but I have to say that I was very fortunate with a 2004 Super Duty 6.0 that I owned. I had ~174,000 miles on it when I sold it, and NEVER had a single problem with it. It hauled heavy payloads on a dedicated route, and it was virtually all highway miles. I sold it out of fear of what “could” be lurking around the corner.
@mistered9435 Wow, it's great to hear a success story about the 6.0 Powerstroke You're one of the lucky few who had a trouble-free experience with this engine, especially hauling heavy payloads on highway routes. Many owners weren't so fortunate, dealing with head gasket failures, EGR issues, and oil cooler breakdowns. Ford tried to address these problems, but “bulletproofing” became the go-to solution-adding ARP head studs, upgraded oil coolers, and EGR deletes to make these trucks reliable workhorses. Your story proves that with proper maintenance and highway driving, the 6.0 could still deliver solid performance. It’s always awesome to hear real-world experiences like yours. Let us know if there are other engines or trucks you'd like us to dive into. Thanks for sharing your story! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video. Keep those muscle car memories alive-have a fantastic day...
I had a Ranger with the 3.8 v6. I drove it for 40k with bad head gaskets. I just kept adding coolant and waiting for the oil to turn into a coffee milkshake. The thing overheated as part of normal operation.
@steveo7006 Thanks for sharing your Ranger experience Dealing with bad head gaskets and overheating must have been really challenging. It highlights the importance of regular maintenance and addressing engine issues promptly to keep your vehicle running smoothly. For all our muscle car enthusiasts, ensuring your engine’s health is crucial for that powerful performance we love. We’d love to hear more about your experiences and any tips you might have for others facing similar issues. Don’t forget to comment below, share your stories, and subscribe to our channel for more awesome content on American Muscle Cars. Let’s keep the passion roaring
2.2L gm engine was NOT bad. Had one in a Cavalier, and at one point went over 100k mile w/o an oil change (was "poor" at the time. Kept it topped off, that was all. It ran over 250k miles, and when traded in, bought a Cobat. Almost wish I still had the Cavalier.
Thanks for sharing your awesome experience, @abn82dmp It’s impressive how your 2.2L GM engine in the Cavalier lasted over 250k miles with just topping off the oil. Your story highlights the durability and potential of these engines when properly maintained. Transitioning to a Cobra must have been thrilling! We’d love to hear more from our community about their muscle car journeys. Don’t forget to comment below with your stories, share this video with fellow enthusiasts, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more great content. Let’s keep the muscle car passion roaring
While the 2.2L wasn’t a powerhouse, it had legendary durability for an economy engine. It's not a muscle car engine, but Chevy showed they could build tough even in small packages.
@jameshanes7982 Thanks for sharing your experience with the GM 3.8L V6 It’s always great to hear real-life stories about the longevity and reliability of these iconic engines. The 3.8L V6 is truly a workhorse in GM’s lineup, known for its durability and solid performance. Many muscle car enthusiasts have fond memories of these engines powering everything from daily drivers to performance builds. It’s no wonder they’ve left such a lasting impression! For those who may not know, the 3.8L V6 was not only reliable but also versatile, powering models like the Buick Grand National-an absolute beast in its time. have a great day...
The Cadillac HT-4100 is much more deserving of a place on this list than the V-4-6-8. With the 4-6-8, all you had to do was deactivate the cylinder deactivation and you had one of the toughest engines ever made; I've even read that just deactivating the inherently rough 6 cylinder mode, letting it switch between 4 and 8 cylinders, was enough to make it smooth and adequately reliable. But there was no easy way to fix the 4100; what can you do with an engine that won't stay in one piece?
the Cadillac HT-4100 earned its reputation for being one of the most troublesome engines of its time. The aluminum block paired with cast-iron heads led to coolant leaks and major reliability headaches. With underwhelming performance and a design that just couldn’t keep up, it was a real letdown for Cadillac fans. On the flip side, the V8-6-4, when cylinder deactivation was bypassed or fine-tuned, proved to be a solid performer. As you mentioned, even leaving just the 4- and 8-cylinder modes intact made a night-and-day difference. It showed that Cadillac had the right idea, but the tech of the time just wasn’t ready. Keep those great comments coming, everyone! We love diving into these topics with you. Don’t forget to share, subscribe, and join the ride with American Muscle Cars. Have an awesome day, and see you in the next video...
I wanted to love the Buick 3800’s, but I’ve both witnessed and experienced catastrophic failures with them, even though they had all been meticulously maintained and never saw much abuse.
Hey there, thanks for sharing your experience with the Buick 3800! It’s tough to hear about catastrophic failures, especially when you’ve taken great care of the engine. The 3800 has a bit of a love-hate reputation in the car community. On one hand, it was praised for its efficiency and power when introduced, even landing a spot on Ward's 10 Best Engines list. On the other, issues like intake manifold gaskets and the occasional random failures have left some owners scratching their heads. That said, plenty of enthusiasts still swear by its durability when properly maintained-and we’d love to hear more stories from others. Maybe some tips or fixes could help someone out there Everyone, if you’ve got a Buick 3800 tale or know a trick to keep these engines running strong, drop a comment below. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more muscle car memories. Hope to see you in the next video, and have a great day...
Respectfully disagree, while GM had its share of flops, let’s not forget Ford and Mopar had their missteps too like Ford's 410 FE or Mopar's 413 'Golden Lion'...
I've heard only good things about the GM 3800 V6, especially it's incredibly good fuel economy. I've heard that up to 30 mpg could be achieved on the highway. As for the Ford 3.8 Essex V6, I had the 4.2 version in my F150 and it had nearly 190K on it when I traded it in. It was still running good.
Thanks so much for sharing your experience You're absolutely right about the GM 3800 V6, it's known for its amazing fuel efficiency, often reaching up to 30 mpg on the highway, making it a great option for long trips. The Ford 3.8 Essex V6 also has a solid reputation, and it's impressive that your F150 ran strong even at nearly 190K miles! These engines really show how durability and efficiency can go hand in hand. We'd love to hear more from everyone, so drop your thoughts in the comments, share your experiences, and don't forget to subscribe for more American muscle car insights Have a great day...
Interesting take, but I gotta say, the GM 3800 V6 gets too much hype for being ‘bulletproof.’ Sure, 30 mpg sounds nice, but it lacked the raw power muscle car fans crave. The Ford Essex 3.8? Solid, but no performance champ either especially compared to old-school V8s. My 4.2 felt underpowered hauling loads in my F150. Honestly, they’re great commuters, but for muscle? Gimme a small-block V8 any day
@@KeithGreene-k1v The GM 3800 V6 truly stands out for its incredible highway fuel economy, often reaching up to 30 mpg. And the Ford 3.8 Essex V6, especially with nearly 190K miles on your F150, is a testament to its durability. Of course, no engine is perfect, some might face issues others haven't experienced yet. That’s why we’d love to hear from all our fans! What’s been your experience with these engines or others? Share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for the best in American Muscle Car content
@@MuscleCarMasters68 The GM 3800 V6 is overhyped. 30 mpg is great, but muscle cars are about power, not MPG. And the Ford Essex 3.8? Durable, sure, but falls flat in performance especially compared to a roaring small block V8. My F150’s 4.2 struggled with loads. For true muscle, there’s no replacement for displacement.
@@KeithGreene-k1v The GM 3800 V6 truly stands out for its incredible highway fuel economy, often reaching up to 30 mpg. And the Ford 3.8 Essex V6, especially with nearly 190K miles on your F150, is a testament to its durability. Of course, no engine is perfect, some might face issues others haven't experienced yet. That’s why we’d love to hear from all our fans What’s been your experience with these engines or others? Share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for the best in American Muscle Car content...Have a great day.
Absolutely, it's incredible what some engines can accomplish with the right maintenance and a bit of luck! The Saturn 1.9L engines, especially the SOHC versions, really have built a reputation for endurance. With regular oil changes, careful maintenance, and even a few part replacements along the way, many of these engines have gone the distance and then some. It's no wonder some hit the 500k mark! Thanks for sharing your experience-keeping these legends alive is what we're all about! To everyone watching, drop your own mileage stories in the comments, share this with fellow enthusiasts, and don’t forget to subscribe for more insights and stories on American Muscle Cars....
Look, I know folks love to slam the 1.9 Saturn, but I'm calling BS on it being unreliable. Mine clocked over 500k miles, and it still ran like a champ. Sure, it might not have the muscle of a classic V8, but for what it was, that engine could go the distance. I get it; it’s not a fire-breathing V8, but sometimes, a car that just keeps going can be more impressive than a finicky powerhouse. Not every engine needs to be a gas-guzzling beast to be respected.
@CookeZachery Absolutely. It's amazing to hear stories like yours-engines that prove their worth not just in raw power but in sheer durability. The Saturn 1.9L, especially in the SOHC form, definitely earned its stripes as a high-mileage workhorse. These engines had some unique design traits that contributed to their longevity, like lightweight aluminum blocks and straightforward engineering that made them easier to maintain. And let’s not forget, it was one of those engines that didn’t need to be flashy to earn respect-it just kept going! And you're right, not every legendary engine needs to be a roaring V8. Sometimes, it's those engines that just keep ticking mile after mile, year after year, that leave a lasting impression. Stories like yours show that there's more to the car world than raw horsepower; reliability and durability deserve their own spotlight too. To everyone else here, what’s your high-mileage hero? Drop your stories in the comments, hit that share button with a fellow car lover, and make sure to subscribe for more incredible tales from the world of American Muscle Cars.
Massive difference between the first gen 3.8 that was in cars in the 80s versus The Late Model 3800 the only thing they really have in common is the displacement. And despite some of the development problems The Late Model 3800 has a more solid durable architecture than the old school 3.8 because of the offset cylinder Banks which take full advantage of the bearing clearance and the optimal positioning for the rods and mains where is the more uniform cylinder Bank design of the old school 3.8 proved to be downfall for the design and problematic in anything that was not also invested with a Turbocharger, those engines got all of the durability goodies along with the go fast goodies but the regular naturally aspirated 3.8 got the short end of the stick.
You're spot on about the massive difference between the first-gen 3.8 and the late-model 3800. The first-gen had its charm but lacked the robustness we see in the 3800's offset cylinder bank design. That offset layout wasn’t just about clever engineering it gave the rods and mains optimal positioning, ensuring greater durability and smoother operation. The early naturally aspirated 3.8s often fell short, missing out on the durability upgrades reserved for their turbocharged counterparts, which had beefier internals to handle the boost. The late-model 3800 fixed those issues, becoming a reliable powerhouse, especially when paired with supercharging. It's why the 3800 Series II and III are fan favorites today, known for solid performance and longevity. What’s your favorite engine generation and why? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic content. Hope to see you in the next video, have a great day
Thank you for sharing your thoughts Cadillac engines of that era had solid potential, but the electronics often let them down. Systems like the V8-6-4 cylinder deactivation were ahead of their time but lacked the refinement we expect today, leading to many reliability complaints. It’s a classic case of great engineering hindered by underdeveloped control technology. That said, opinions on this engine are divisive. Some fans believe it’s one of the most innovative concepts Cadillac ever attempted, while others view it as a total misstep. What do you all think? Was this engine truly a failure, or just a victim of early electronic limitations? Let’s hear your experiences and opinions in the comments! Keep sharing, commenting, and subscribing to Muscle Car Masters-your voice fuels this community. Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day.
YEP! I hot-rodded a '70 8.2l (500ci) Cadillac v8 and put it in a '74 3/4 ton GMC 4x4 (K2500). Runing approx. 450hp / 560 ft-lb torque. Was a beast, couldn't keep a trans behind it. Truck had a TH350, and had to rebuild it multiple times. Finally got a race shop to do a good rebuild, then sheared the transfer case bolts off. Great engine, could easily turn 38" Monster-Mudder tires into smoke in about 1/2 sec., plus with all the torque, 12-16mpg was typical (not bad for 4bbl Holley Carb.)
@@abn82dmp Wow, what an incredible build! That '70 8.2L Cadillac V8 in a '74 K2500 sounds like an absolute monster. 450hp and 560 ft-lb of torque is no joke! It's a testament to how much raw power those engines had, especially when paired with some creative hot-rodding. The story of blowing through TH350 transmissions and even shearing transfer case bolts speaks volumes about the sheer force behind it. And 12-16 mpg? Impressive for a Holley-fed beast like that We’d love to hear more stories like this-share your builds, experiences, and thoughts below. Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars....hope to see you next time.
I had to stop when they said the 3.8/3800 was a bad engine. The engine makes decent power in naturally aspirated form and better power in its forced induction form. 2 issues with the engine which are easily fixed and these engines are known to go 350-500,000 miles.
Hey @therealR.D., thanks so much for your comment and for sharing your thoughts the 3.8/3800 engine is often underrated. In its naturally aspirated form, it does make respectable power, and when you add a forced induction system, it really wakes up, showing just how capable that engine is. The reliability of these engines is another key point-when well-maintained, they really can go the distance, often hitting impressive mileage numbers like you mentioned, from 350,000 to 500,000 miles. It's all about keeping them in good shape, especially when addressing the known issues, which are relatively easy to fix, as you pointed out. We appreciate your input, and it’s great to see fellow muscle car fans who understand these engines' true potential! To everyone else, don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to stay up-to-date on all things American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the newest videos-have a nice weekend
Thanks so much for sharing your perspective You bring up a really important point about how the reputation of certain engines often reflects how they’re maintained rather than the quality of their design. In the world of American muscle, proper upkeep can make all the difference. When enthusiasts truly invest time, care, and attention into their rides-performing regular tune-ups, using quality parts, and ensuring proper storage engines that might be labeled “problematic” can actually deliver fantastic performance and longevity. Your comment reminds us that it’s not only about the engineering that went into these legendary powerplants, but also the dedication and passion that owners bring to the table. Every American muscle car has a story that’s shaped by the hands and hearts of those who maintain it. We’d love to hear more thoughts and experiences from you and other viewers, so be sure to comment, share your stories, and subscribe for more great American Muscle Cars content...
As much as I love (loved?) the Mazda Wankel Rotary Engine, the pre-1974 versions were REALLY bad. As in, it's going to give you lots of trouble before dying at 30,000-40,000 miles bad. By the time they got to the 1976-77 models, they were quite good if you maintained them properly. This helped the 1979-1985 RX-7 become the huge success that it was.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the Mazda Wankel Rotary Engine You’re absolutely right-those early pre-1974 models were plagued with reliability issues, mainly due to apex seal failures and oil consumption. But Mazda didn’t give up. By the mid-70s, they had ironed out the problems, making the rotary far more durable. The RX-7 you mentioned? It was a game-changer. Its lightweight chassis and high-revving rotary engine made it a hit, capturing the spirit of pure performance. As muscle car fans, we can appreciate how innovation, even with its bumps, shapes automotive history. From the rumble of a V8 to the scream of a rotary, it’s all about passion for the road. What’s your favorite muscle car-engine combo? Let us know in the comments Don’t forget to share, subscribe, and keep the American Muscle Cars spirit alive. Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day
@@MuscleCarMasters68 I'm more of a sports car/sports sedan/rally car guy than a muscle car guy. I love admitting though that Dodge's Hellcat Chargers and Challengers had me giddy almost every time I thought about how outrageous they were! 707 NET, emissions legal horsepower with a factory warranty for "only" $80,000? That was almost impossible to believe! Big, silly, unbelievably fast cars made by an American manufacturer. Iconic and legendary the moment they came out. Tesla got my attention when they started making AWDs and they were fast to boot. Now many of their faster accelerating models are changing minds about what constitutes a fast car/SUV.
Thanks for sharing your love for cars The Hellcat lineup is a wild mix of raw power and American engineering-707 horsepower with a warranty is truly mind-blowing. Dodge brought the muscle car back into legendary status with these beasts. Tesla, though, has flipped the script with insane acceleration in electric form, proving speed comes in many shapes. Muscle cars, sports cars, or rally legends-it’s all about that thrill on the road... What’s your dream car-engine combo? Let us know in the comments. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars! Hope to see you next videos. Stay inspired and have an amazing day
The GM 3800 is a legend From the Series I to the supercharged Series II, it’s a testament to engineering done right durable, powerful, and endlessly adaptable. It powered everything from sedans to sports cars and earned its spot among the all-time greats. Whether naturally aspirated or boosted, this V6 proved GM could deliver reliability and performance in one package. What do YOU think? Does the 3800 deserve the #1 spot? Share your thoughts below, and let’s keep this muscle car conversation roaring Don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe for more engine history and horsepower Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day...
The 80’s 350 V8 converted to diesel was total junk. I rode in one a friend of mine had bought for $1,000 and it was only a few months old. His boss had bought and hated it and sold it for a big loss. It was probably the slowest car I ever rode in. You could walk across the road faster than it. He pulled the engine and converted it back to gasoline and it was then a nice driving car.
@Dld1985 Thanks for sharing that story what a wild experience The 1980s diesel-converted 350 V8 is often remembered as a misstep in automotive history, but it's great to hear that your friend's conversion back to gasoline brought new life to the car. It's a testament to the resilience and adaptability of classic American muscle! Keep the stories coming, your insights make this channel even better. For everyone watching, what’s your take on the most failed engine or car setup in history? Drop a comment, share your stories, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more classic car tales and insights!
I didn't own one but remember the Cadillac 8-6-4 as problematic and wonder how it ever made it to production. I bought a new 1984 Chevy Silverado with a 5.0 V8 and it was ok at first but later it was problematic.
Thanks for sharing your memories! The Cadillac 8-6-4 was certainly a bold move, aiming for fuel efficiency by deactivating cylinders-a concept ahead of its time. Unfortunately, the technology wasn't quite there, leading to reliability issues. GM’s ECM struggled to manage the transitions smoothly, frustrating many owners. However, it laid the groundwork for modern cylinder deactivation systems we see today. As for your '84 Chevy Silverado with the 5.0 V8, those engines were known for their dependability when well-maintained, but carburetor issues and emissions control systems often caused headaches. Many owners found upgrading to a better carb or tweaking the timing made a world of difference. It’s always fascinating to hear these stories-our passion for these classic rides keeps them alive! What’s your favorite memory from that Silverado? Let us know below, and don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars! Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day....
As a mechanic back in the 80s the Caddy 8 6 4 was not a bad engine. When it changed cylinders the car seemed to missfire. A simple fix was to cut the control wire at the ECM to eliminate the change over.
WHEN I WAS LIVING IN PHOENIX, AZ. I OWNED A '97 CHEVY CAMARO WITH THE 3800 V-6 AND I HAD NO PROBLEMS WITH IT. I PURCHASED IT IN GLENDALE, AZ. RIGHT OFF THE LOT. I SOLD IT ABOUT FIVE YEARS LATER.
Cadillac 390 circa 1963 was an awful motor. Oil pumps in the front cover, oil pickup tube was almost feet long, Dealerships told customers to not change their oil. I built 3 of these for my best buddy and they never last long, the cast iron blicks are horrible and were never bored well. Just junk
Thank you so much for sharing your experience and thoughts on the Cadillac 390 It’s fascinating to hear firsthand insights, especially from someone who’s worked on these engines. While the 390 is often remembered as a key part of Cadillac’s luxury performance in the early ‘60s, it certainly had its share of challenges. The long oil pickup tube and front-mounted oil pump were definitely design quirks, and lack of proper maintenance compounded reliability issues. Cadillac prioritized smooth power delivery over durability back then, which might explain some of the machining inconsistencies you mentioned. Your story highlights how important maintenance and design quality are for classic engines! For everyone else, what’s been your experience with Cadillac motors? Drop a comment below, share your stories, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more discussions about the highs-and lows-of classic engines. Let’s keep this conversation rolling
I couldn’t disagree more That Cadillac 390 was a powerhouse for its time smooth, torquey, and reliable if maintained right. Sure, the oil system wasn’t perfect, but most issues were from neglect or cheap oil. I’ve rebuilt a couple, and they’re bulletproof if done properly. Cast iron blocks were solid, and boring issues? Probably a bad shop.....
The 3.0 Mitsubishi motor. The single overhead cam (SOHC) version of the 3.0L V6 was known for its simplicity and reliability, while the dual overhead cam (DOHC) version was a bit more complex, but definitely held up well with fewer known issues. The SOHC motor was also widely used in cars like the Dodge Caravan and Chrysler LeBaron, gaining a reputation for durability over the years. If anyone has memories of driving these cars or has a different take, we’d love to hear it! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to keep these great discussions going on American Muscle Cars!
Everyone's always quick to call out the DOHC 3.0 Mitsubishi motor as some 'engineering marvel,' but let's be real here-single overhead cam was the way to go! Fewer headaches, fewer moving parts, and honestly, it held up better than the DOHC model ever could. In my experience, the DOHC was the one that needed constant tweaking just to keep running smooth. The SOHC? Rock solid by comparison.
@CookeZachery You're absolutely right about the SOHC version of the 3.0 Mitsubishi V6. It’s a classic case of “less is more”-with fewer moving parts, the SOHC setup offered easier maintenance, fewer timing issues, and overall reliability that owners could count on. This engine also became popular because of its smooth, dependable performance in models like the Dodge Dynasty and Plymouth Acclaim, where it proved to be a long-haul motor for families and commuters alike. On the other hand, the DOHC version, while it brought more power and performance potential, did require more tuning and was prone to issues if not meticulously maintained. Some even argued that it felt a bit over-engineered for its time, especially compared to the rock-solid simplicity of the SOHC. For many enthusiasts, the SOHC 3.0 ended up being the reliable workhorse while the DOHC became more of a high-maintenance choice. If anyone else has memories with these engines-whether you were dealing with the DOHC’s quirks or enjoying the SOHC’s no-fuss dependability-share your story with us in the comments! And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Every story helps us keep these conversations rolling and the history alive...
@@DayTwo-w8n As someone who worked on these engines back in the day, I never understood the hype around the DOHC 3.0 Mitsubishi. Sure, it looks great on paper, but in practice? Constantly chasing oil leaks, valve guide issues, and worn seals was a regular occurrence. Meanwhile, the SOHC version quietly got the job done with fewer complications. Less moving parts meant fewer chances for something to go wrong-simple as that. The DOHC crowd can keep bragging about "higher revs," but what's the point if you're spending all that time under the hood? Give me a reliable SOHC any day of the week.
ya, i had a '03 gmc sonoma with that dam 2.2l, in my 47 years of driving many cars and trucks, IT WAS THE SLOWEST, MOST GUTLESS vehicle i have EVER driven. i have 2.7 tacoma, was ok, 2.3l ranger, was ok. but it couldn't move out of its own way, with n empty truck, turn on the AC or put ANY load and you needed to deploy the sails to help push you along.. heh maybe in some econobox small car it might have worked, but NOT A TRUCK. it never shoulda been even considered for trucks.
the 2.2L in the '03 Sonoma was an engine that left a lot of drivers underwhelmed, especially when paired with a truck. While it might have been acceptable in a lightweight econobox, expecting it to handle the demands of a truck, especially with the AC running or carrying a load, was asking too much. For comparison, engines like the 2.3L Ranger or the 2.7L Tacoma provided at least adequate performance for their class, but the 2.2L struggled to deliver torque where it mattered most. It’s a classic case of manufacturers trying to balance fuel economy and costs without considering real-world truck use. We’d love to hear from others-did you ever own a truck with an underwhelming engine? Drop a comment, share your story, and don't forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engine talk. Have a great weekend, and see you in the next video...
I suspect that there might be a worse one; a carbureted 2.8l v6 in a 1984 S-10 blazer! I had one, and if I was driving into a headwind, it could not maintain 55mph at wide open throttle!
@@mistered9435 You're absolutely right-those carbureted 2.8L V6s in the early S-10 Blazers were infamous for leaving drivers frustrated. Wide open throttle just to hit 55 mph? That’s rough! It reminds me of the 2.2L in the '03 Sonoma-another engine that seemed better suited for a compact car than a truck. It’s amazing how engines like the 2.3L Ranger or 2.7L Tacoma could at least keep up, while some GM small blocks left drivers shaking their heads. What about you, gearheads? Have an awesome day-see you in the next video
Most of these issues were results of government intervention in the form of the EPA . Chrysler had economic versions as well as performance engines in V-8 and 6 cylinder that performed well . As did Ford with 4-6. & v8 . Several that were bullet proof . GM as well .
Thanks for your thoughtful comment, @ramie-uz9xi You’re absolutely right about the impact of government regulations like the EPA on the muscle car industry. While these regulations forced automakers to adapt, they also pushed them to innovate in some interesting ways. Chrysler’s performance V8 and six-cylinder engines, along with Ford’s 4-, 6-, and V8 options, were legendary for their reliability and raw power. The bulletproof engines you're talking about, like the Ford FE and Chrysler's 440, are definitely iconic in the muscle car world. GM also had their share of powerhouse engines, and it's fascinating to see how all three brands adapted to the changing market while still delivering those legendary performance figures. It’s a testament to their engineering and determination. For everyone watching, drop your thoughts in the comments! Share your favorite muscle car engines or any other insights you have. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more deep dives into these classics. Hope to see you in the newest videos... have a nice weekend
You might want to think about creating a dedicated list just for GM's failed engines. From the 3.1L V6 to the Oldsmobile Diesel and even the 2.4L Quad 4, there’s a whole lineup of GM engines that could fill an entire video series on their own.
GM's lineup of 'challenging' engines could easily fill an entire video series. Starting with the 3.1L V6, known for head gasket issues, to the Oldsmobile Diesel, which, while innovative, fell short with reliability concerns and a lack of durability - GM certainly had its share of experimental designs. And then there's the 2.4L Quad 4! Originally intended as a high-output, efficient engine, it faced problems like head gasket leaks and timing chain issues, making it memorable for all the wrong reasons. The potential for a full series on these engines is huge. We'd love to dive into the stories behind each of these powerplants, from the engineers' visions to the real-world outcomes. Everyone, let us know in the comments if you'd like to see that series! Be sure to share this video and subscribe to American Muscle Cars - we’ve got more in-depth content on GM's history and much more coming your way!
@@MuscleCarMasters68 you could just make a series about GM using a worse engine than there was in the GM family for "reasons". particularly in the 4 cyls of 80s. particularly the fiero.
@@lasskinn474 GM's history of sometimes ‘puzzling’ engine choices in the '80s is prime material for a series! The Fiero's 2.5L "Iron Duke" engine is a perfect example: initially meant to balance economy and durability, it didn’t quite meet expectations, especially with some high-profile failures and recalls due to oil leaks and connecting rod issues. And when it came to high-performance potential? Well, the Iron Duke left enthusiasts wanting a lot more. And let's not forget the 2.8L V6, which, although better suited to the Fiero's ambitions, still wasn’t without quirks, from cooling issues to intake manifold problems. GM had higher-output engines in their arsenal, but cost and design constraints meant they often stuck to engines that weren't quite up to the demands of spirited driving. We’re excited about diving into this series - tracing how each decision played out for GM and for the fans who loved (or put up with!) these engines. So, let us know what you think in the comments, share this video with fellow fans, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. We’re ready to take a deep dive into these engines and bring you more on GM's legacy, both the highs and the lows....
@@lasskinn474 I get where you're coming from, but I’d argue that not all of GM’s 4-cylinder engines of the ’80s were worse choices. For instance, the Fiero’s original engine may have had its limitations, but the 2.5L ‘Iron Duke’ was actually chosen for its reliability and fuel efficiency, which were key priorities during the fuel-conscious 1980s. It may not have been a performance powerhouse, but it fit the needs of the time. Plus, GM did make strides in other engine areas later on, like with the Quad 4. There's definitely a list of misses, but it's not all one-sided....
@@CookeZachery the european gm wing for latter half of 80s had cheaper, lighter engines that did same power with much less displacement as the duke while being more fuel efficient though. like 90hp is 1.6l region, not 2.5. GM had cheap efficient 4 cyl designs all along within the company. at the latter end if they had done a fiero2 just with the driving gear from the turbo 4wd calibra that could've been really something. the refusal to use the european gm designs that went into cheaper cars and were more efficient would make for a decent video. not just 4 cyls, 1990 opel/vauxhall had a saloon with a turbo inline six that had higher top speed than the zr1 1990 - that also used less fuel.
Great list, but I was definitely expecting to see the Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines make an appearance! Both of these had their fair share of infamous issues, from the 4100's oil leaks and underwhelming power to the Northstar's notorious head gasket failures and high maintenance costs.
The Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines both brought their own unique challenges to the table. The 4100, introduced in the early '80s, was Cadillac’s attempt to downsize and improve fuel efficiency, but it faced issues like low horsepower and oil leaks that hurt its reputation. Cadillac intended it to be economical, but many enthusiasts found it lacked the performance expected from the Cadillac name. The Northstar, on the other hand, was Cadillac’s high-tech flagship engine in the '90s. Known for its power and smoothness, it unfortunately became infamous for head gasket issues, high repair costs, and a complex design that could be challenging to maintain. The Northstar had potential and offered a solid driving experience-when it was running well-but the long-term reliability concerns overshadowed its performance for many owners. If you’ve got more to add or have experience with these engines, we’d love to hear about it! Drop your thoughts in the comments, and if you’re enjoying the deep dives into American muscle history, make sure to comment, share, and subscribe for more content on both the iconic and controversial engines that shaped the industry....
@@MuscleCarMasters68 The 4100, introduced during a time when Cadillac was under pressure to meet new fuel efficiency standards, indeed struggled with reliability. Its aluminum block, combined with cast-iron heads, often led to overheating and coolant issues that frustrated owners. Plus, its low output of around 125 horsepower really did fall short of the powerhouse reputation Cadillac had built over decades. Unfortunately, despite Cadillac's effort to embrace fuel economy, the 4100’s reputation stuck as one of the brand’s weaker engines.
totally agree.... The Cadillac 4100 and Northstar absolutely deserve a spot on this list for their unique character! Sure, some fans love to bash on these engines for their issues, but let's be real - they brought something different to the muscle car world! The 4100 may not have been the strongest, but its quirks make it memorable. And the Northstar? Head gaskets aside, it showed Cadillac was still trying to push the envelope with advanced tech, even if it came with a few challenges. These engines definitely deserve some recognition
Absolutely, you nailed it! The Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines were bold moves for their time, and they both deserve more credit than they get. The HT4100 may have been modest on power, but it marked a period where Cadillac was experimenting with weight-saving aluminum and fuel efficiency, which was a huge pivot from the land yacht era. This engine paved the way for Cadillac to rethink what a luxury performance engine could be, quirks and all! And as for the Northstar, Cadillac really went for innovation. Variable valve timing, all-aluminum construction, and the Northstar's high-revving nature were ahead of their time, especially in the luxury market. Despite the well-known head gasket issues, the Northstar was a powerhouse for Cadillac’s return to performance - and let’s face it, it set the stage for a whole new era of Cadillac performance vehicles. Let’s hear what you all think! Share your stories, opinions, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars so we can keep this conversation going and give these engines the recognition they deserve!
You're absolutely right The Iron Duke in the Fiero did have a reduced oil capacity due to its shallow oil pan, all in the name of lowering the car's stance. Unfortunately, that design compromise contributed to engine durability issues, especially under spirited driving conditions. It's a reminder of how engineering trade-offs can impact performance and reliability. For those who love the Fiero or the Iron Duke, share your experiences and tips in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more fascinating insights. Wishing everyone a great day, see you in the next video
@@timdodd3897 Yes, the Audi 1.8T shares some of the same challenges when it comes to engine design compromises. Just like the Iron Duke in the Fiero, the 1.8T's performance can be influenced by factors like oil capacity and cooling, which affect durability, especially when pushed hard. It's a perfect example of how every engine has its strengths and weaknesses. For those of you who love these engines, drop your thoughts and experiences in the comments we’d love to hear your stories! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more muscle car passion and insights. Keep the engine roaring...
I have known the 122/2200 engine to be very reliable. I own a 98 s10 with 560,000 on the original/untouched 2200 engine. They definitely lack in power. The head gaskets are something I have encountered in engines from the early to mid 90s and rarely in later models.
Wow, 560,000 miles on an untouched 2200 engine-that’s absolutely incredible and a true testament to its reliability You’re right about the power, though; these engines weren’t built for speed but for durability. The head gasket issues you mentioned were more common in the earlier versions, and GM seemed to improve the design in the later models, making them tougher over time. Your S10 proves just how solid these engines can be with proper care. Let’s hear from everyone-share your high-mileage stories, hit that like button, and don’t forget to subscribe for more! Hope to see you in the next video. Have a fantastic day
@@MuscleCarMasters68my parents both owned cavaliers (80s/early 90s) that went over 300,000. Unfortunately for my s10, everything else around the engine is going to pot. Interior plastics cracking and breaking, electrical problems and rust on the body and frame. I haven’t given up yet, but the decision on whether to get it past another inspection is happening right now.
@@BucktailFishing Wow, 560,000 miles on an untouched 2200 engine-now that’s what we call bulletproof reliability! GM may not have built these engines for raw power, but they sure knew how to keep them ticking. It’s a shame about the S10’s other issues; unfortunately, rust and brittle interior plastics were common battles for trucks of that era. Still, the fact that you’re considering keeping it alive shows your dedication-it’s a true labor of love for any enthusiast. For those watching, let’s hear your stories! Have you pushed your car or truck past 300,000 miles? Drop your high-mileage victories in the comments below.
No mention of the Northstar? And what about Cummins' infamous killer dowel pin or the Vulcan V6? Seems like a missed chance to cover some of the biggest headaches out there! Those engines brought plenty of challenges, from costly repairs to full-on engine rebuilds.
The Northstar, Cummins’ killer dowel pin (KDP), and the Vulcan V6 all have their own unique stories of challenges and costly repairs. The Northstar engine, for example, was groundbreaking in design with its DOHC and aluminum construction but became infamous for head gasket failures and the challenging, labor-intensive repair process. It’s a real love-hate relationship for those who’ve had one! And that killer dowel pin on the Cummins engines - what a nightmare! If that pin came loose, it could cause catastrophic damage by falling into the timing gears, potentially leading to full engine failure. Luckily, a KDP fix kit became available and has saved many engines since. The Vulcan V6 may not have gained as much fame, but its own issues with oil leaks and cooling system flaws left many owners facing big bills over time. It’s amazing to see how these engines, while still beloved, brought their fair share of headaches. Thanks for pointing these out! Everyone, feel free to share more engine stories and experiences - we’d love to hear from you. And if you’re enjoying these deep dives, make sure to comment, share, and subscribe to keep the American Muscle Car discussions rolling...
@@DeannaLobes This engine, though not known for powerhouse performance, was designed with simplicity and durability in mind, which kept it chugging along for hundreds of thousands of miles. It’s true that while the engine itself was practically bulletproof, the transmissions paired with it often couldn’t keep up - particularly the AX4S and AX4N automatic transmissions, which had a reputation for early failures due to heat buildup and insufficient fluid flow. Ford even released a few upgrades over the years, but some Vulcan owners still remember the dreaded “trans light” warning flash! What’s fascinating about the Vulcan is that it earned a bit of a cult following because of its reliability in the right conditions. While not exactly a screamer on the track, it had a loyal fanbase in part because it was easy to repair and had a forgiving design for DIY mechanics. And you’re right - like the Northstar and Cummins KDP, the Vulcan V6 has its own tale of quirks and resilience! Thanks for bringing it up! We’d love to hear more from everyone on their experiences with the Vulcan or any other engine stories. If you’ve had memorable moments - good or bad - with these engines, drop them in the comments! And don’t forget to share, subscribe, and join us as we keep exploring the quirks, stories, and legends of American Muscle Cars.
@@DeannaLobes Totally agree about the missed opportunities here! I can't believe there was no mention of those notorious engines like the Northstar and Vulcan V6 - they both have a history of serious issues that would’ve been worth exploring. And let’s not forget the infamous Cummins killer dowel pin! Ignoring these engines is like sweeping all the big headaches under the rug. These engines aren’t just niche problems; they were nightmares for a lot of people! It would’ve been a solid addition to really dive into the realities of owning these notorious engines.
@@DeannaLobes Honestly, I don't get all the complaints about the Vulcan V6. For a lot of folks, it was a dependable workhorse that just kept going, even if it wasn't a powerhouse. And the transmissions? They weren’t as bad as people make them out to be-probably just a few isolated issues getting blown out of proportion. Same with the Northstar. Yeah, they had their quirks, but plenty of them ran well without any major drama. Cummins' 'killer dowel pin' was overblown too; it’s not like every engine was bound to fall apart. Seems like people focus on a few hiccups and ignore the engines that went the distance without any fuss...
Why is the GM 3800 on this list, I disagree that it was a bad engine. I think it was one of their best ever built. and also the GM 2200 or 2.2 Liter Ecotec is what is currently in my chevy cavalier with 168k on it and nothing ever done to the engine other than coolant flush when I bought it at 70k and regular 5k oil changes. They are known to go 300k in the L-61 variant with proper maintenance, so I don't know how that is a bad engine either. I do agree with the 2.4 Litre Iron duke not being good though. They ate camshafts, or at least that was my experience with them in my 85 cutlass ciera.
Hey, thanks so much for sharing your perspective We truly appreciate hearing from viewers who have firsthand experience with these engines. You make a great point about the GM 3800 and the 2.2L Ecotec (L61). Many enthusiasts do consider the GM 3800 to be one of the best engines that General Motors produced, known for its durability and smooth torque delivery. Likewise, the 2.2L Ecotec in your Chevy Cavalier has indeed proven its longevity, with many owners reporting well over 200,000 miles on these engines when properly maintained. It’s great to see these stories, as they show that personal care and regular upkeep can make a significant difference. Every engine design has its strengths and weaknesses, and personal experiences vary. Thanks again for weighing in with your story, it helps enrich our community’s understanding. Be sure to share your own engine experiences below, hit that subscribe button, and spread the word about American Muscle Cars
But let’s not overlook the Iron Duke’s role in GM history. Sure, it had its flaws, but it powered countless cars through the ’80s. Sometimes, durability isn’t just performance; it’s resilience through tough times...
Thank you for your feedback. The Subaru 2.5 turbo, often found in the WRX and STI, is a legendary engine known for its rally heritage and insane tuning potential, especially when paired with all-wheel drive. As for the Pontiac Sunfire, while it’s not a muscle car, it reminds us how diverse car culture really is-from JDM icons to compact American coupes. We appreciate sharp-eyed viewers like you keeping us on point-it’s how we grow as a channel. Keep the feedback coming, folks.
had an 89 geo metoir with the suziki 3 cylinder. drove it many times from virginia to kansas. with a little tweeking to the carb and ignition timing, 50 MPG were very doable. only problem was the small car would beat you to death if there was a cross wind, or a lot of big trucks on a two lane.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it's great to hear from passionate muscle car fans like you. You're right, 'most failed engines' lists can stir up a lot of debate because everyone has their own experiences and favorites. We aim to shine a light on engines that might not have lived up to their potential or had significant issues, but there's always room for discussion. If you think we missed some or included one that doesn't belong, drop those suggestions in the comments-we’d love to hear your take! That’s what makes the muscle car community so special; it’s all about sharing knowledge and stories. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars so we can keep bringing you these deep dives into automotive history. Hope to see you in the next video Have a fantastic day, and keep those wheels turning
Ah, the infamous 2.8 Chevy V6-GM's attempt to modernize with a compact engine for smaller cars and trucks in the late '70s and '80s. While it had promise, you’re absolutely right about the rod bearing issue. The early models, especially those before 1985, were notorious for oiling system deficiencies. Low oil pressure and insufficient lubrication at higher RPMs caused premature wear on the bearings. Later versions improved somewhat, especially with the introduction of the 3.1L and 3.4L variants, which built on the same platform but addressed some of those early flaws. Despite its flaws, the 2.8 V6 powered plenty of iconic vehicles, from the Camaro to the S-10 pickups, making it a memorable engine for many enthusiasts. We’d love to hear what you think share your stories, memories, and experiences! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters! Hope to see you in the next video, and have an awesome day
Thanks for catching that, @jimlangley4779 Yes....the Ford 1.9L 4-cylinder engine in the 1988 1/2 Escort LX is a detail we didn’t mention. It's always awesome to hear from fellow enthusiasts who know their stuff! While it’s not a muscle car engine, it’s definitely a key piece of Ford’s history during that era. Your comment adds great value to the discussion-keep those insights coming! For everyone watching, let’s keep the conversation going! What’s your favorite engine or forgotten gem from American automotive history? Drop your thoughts below, and who knows, it might inspire our next video. have a good day...hope to see you next comments...
@MuscleCarMasters68 my dad had a 1988 1/2 it snapped two camshaft and eventually Ford just replaced the entire engine which fixed the problem, don't know if it was a different version of the 1.9 but it ran better than it ever did which dad traded it for a Ford F-150 not long after that
@@jimlangley4779 Thanks for sharing that story, @jimlangley4779 It’s amazing how those real-life experiences with Ford engines add so much depth to the conversation. The 1.9L may not be a muscle car powerhouse, but it’s a fascinating part of Ford's evolution, especially during the late ‘80s. Replacing the engine must have been a turning point, and trading up to the iconic F-150? Classic move hope to see you on newest videos...have a good weekend.
Thanks for sharing your point of view! It’s true that every mechanic develops an instinct for spotting troublesome designs, and some engines or cars definitely earned their reputations as "problematic." That said, these so-called clunkers often have fascinating stories behind their creation, from corporate decisions to innovative features that didn’t quite pan out. Take the Oldsmobile Diesel V8, for example-it had groundbreaking potential but was held back by cost-cutting measures. Or the Vega, which had innovative aluminum engine tech but struggled with reliability and rust issues. We’d love to hear more from you and others about the cars you’ve worked on and what stood out, good or bad! Let’s keep the conversation rolling. If you enjoy exploring these stories and their impact on automotive history, comment, share your experiences, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters. Let’s keep the passion for muscle cars alive.
Thanks for sharing your experience with the GM 3.1 V6 It’s true-many owners had great reliability from this engine, with proper maintenance making all the difference. However, the 3.1 also had a reputation for intake manifold gasket issues, which led to its mixed legacy. That said, it’s always fascinating to hear stories of engines that defied the odds! What do you all think? Did the GM 3.1 earn its place in history, or does it belong on the "most failed" list? Let us know in the comments, share your thoughts, and subscribe for more great content! Hope to see you in the next video have a great day
@jimlangley4779 That 79 Cutlass Supreme with the 305 4-barrel sounds like a true classic Those late '70s rides had a unique style and presence that still turn heads today. The 305 may not have been the biggest engine, but paired with the right setup, it offered a solid mix of performance and reliability. Thanks for sharing your story, it’s always awesome to hear about the cars that hold a special place in people’s lives! Everyone, drop your favorite muscle car stories in the comments, hit that like button, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead goodness Keep cruising, have a great day.
Add the GM Ecotec 4 banger found in the 2004 Cavelier LS Sport. I had one that died at 67,000 miles due to a stretched timing chain. It took me a year to pay the $1600 repair cost, only to lose my money when they recalled it a year later for that same problem. This engine is recognizable with its oil filter cartridge housing being cast into the block and easily seen in the left front corner (in car relation position) of the block. Ik is simply a fragile engine, and it is junk.
Thanks for sharing your experience with the GM Ecotec 4-cylinder in the 2004 Cavalier LS Sport. It's unfortunate that you had such a costly and frustrating time with that engine. The Ecotec 4-banger, while a solid performer in many other applications, did have its issues, especially with timing chain problems. This kind of failure is a reminder of how even some well-known engines can fall short in terms of reliability. It's frustrating when a car lets you down like that, especially after putting money into a repair, only to have it recalled for the same issue. The oil filter housing, a unique feature of the Ecotec, definitely made it stand out, but it didn't save it from being a bit too fragile in the long run. For all the real American muscle fans out there, we love hearing your stories and insights. Drop your thoughts in the comments, share with your fellow car enthusiasts, and don't forget to subscribe to keep the muscle car passion alive Let’s keep the love for these legendary machines strong...
The Buick 3800 Series 2 was supposedly a great engine. The early 3800, not so much! I owned some of these knocking oil burning beasts, and even though I belong to Buick Club of America, and am the local Chapter Director, I will say those early 3.8 liter V6 Buicks are all turkeys. A quart every 300 to 400 miles was doing good, and they would knock going uphill. Also, no power to speak of. When the speed limit was 55 mph they barely were good enough to keep up with traffic. Dangerously slow with a 70 mph limit!!
Great comment, @fredanddebramacdonald2445 You bring up a solid point about the early Buick 3.8 V6. While they laid the foundation for the legendary 3800 Series II, those first-generation engines definitely had their struggles-oil consumption, knocks, and that lack of punch were real headaches for owners back in the day. By the time Buick refined things for the 3800 Series II in the '90s, it became one of the most reliable and efficient engines ever produced. Some folks still call it the ‘modern-day straight-six’ for its smoothness and durability. I’d love to hear what others think-any Buick fans out there with stories about these engines? Drop your thoughts in the comments! And if you haven’t already, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to the channel. There’s plenty more coming your way, and I hope to see you in the newest videos. Have a nice day
Thanks for your honest feedback We’re always looking for ways to improve the viewing experience, and your input helps us fine-tune our content for true muscle car enthusiasts like you. While we aim to create engaging videos, we’ll revisit those effects to ensure they’re not a distraction. Stay tuned for more deep dives into the iconic world of American Muscle Cars. Let us know what you’d like to see next! Your thoughts drive this channel forward. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to join a growing community of muscle car fans. Let’s keep the passion alive Have a good day.
Wow, @808bigisland, that's incredible A 2.2 Vortec with 450,000 km and still going strong proof of solid engineering and great maintenance on your part. And to compare it to a legendary '54 Stovebolt? That’s some high praise! It’s amazing how these engines, though not traditional muscle powerplants, have carved their own legacy of reliability. To everyone tuning in, what’s the highest mileage or best experience you’ve had with an engine? Drop your stories below, let’s keep the conversation going! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the newest videos... have a nice weekend
Disagree about the Chevy 2.2. Mine used no oil and wasn't that weak. Sold the truck with over 150,000 miles still going strong. Mitsubishi V6 DID have poor valve guides. Haven't heard bad stuff about the 255 Ford V8. It was still a basic Windsor engine so how could Ford goof it up? Ford found a way. Had the Ford 3.8 in 1990 Cougar. Car itself was a PIA>>always fixing something. The engine sprung an antifreeze leak between the front cover and the block that I had to fix. Chevy 305 wasn't that bad. Oil leaks were common with everything. Flat tappet cams of the era (and still today) were poorly heat treated and went flat easily. I disagree about the 3800. It was the BEST engine GM built. The EARLIER 3.8 wasn't good>>weak engine. 2.5 Iron Duke WAS weak from the factory but the basic design could handle some serious power. Quad 4 had a POTENTIALLY good design but quality was poor.
Thank you for sharing such detailed insights and experiences It’s always great to hear firsthand accounts that challenge or support the points in our videos. The 2.2 and 305 Chevy engines certainly have their defenders, and you’re right-maintenance and luck often play huge roles in engine longevity. As for the 255 Ford V8, its design limitations for emissions and economy left it underpowered, even by 1980s standards. The 3.8 Ford in your Cougar is a testament to the challenges of balancing reliability with complex components like timing covers. The 3800's legendary status among GM engines is well-deserved, it’s a powerhouse of reliability compared to earlier iterations like the 3.8 Buick. And the Quad 4? A missed opportunity, indeed We love these kinds of debates, so keep them coming! Everyone, drop your thoughts, share this video, and hit subscribe to keep the conversation rolling.... Have a good day.
Disagree all you want, but facts don’t lie... The Chevy 2.2 earned its rep for weak performance, especially compared to real muscle. And yeah, the 305 could run, but it was no powerhouse. The 255 Ford? Ford totally botched it, low compression, weak power, and smog equipment strangled it. As for the 3.8, early versions were junk. Sure, the 3800 improved, but BEST? Not when Buick’s 455 existed....
Disagree about the 255 Ford V8? Fair point, it’s still a Windsor block, but Ford cut compression and flow to chase fuel economy, killing its power. Sure, the Chevy 305 had leaks, but it could run forever with care. And the 3800? Absolute legend
Wow, a Lotus Elise with a turbocharged 1.8L Acura engine? That’s a wild combo and an impressive build! The Elise is known for its lightweight handling and sharp cornering, so adding the power and reliability of an Acura turbo engine must make it a real rocket on the streets! Acura’s 1.8L engines, especially with a turbo, are known for their high-revving performance and durability. It's a unique contrast to the big displacement V8s we talk about here, but it shows how creative enthusiasts are in pushing boundaries with imports and domestic swaps alike. We love hearing stories about unique cars like this, so thanks for sharing..
The Volvo 2.8v6 that was made together with Peugeot and Renault was a very bad engine. It was made with 90dgr angle , first it was made as a v8 , and knowing for its rough stationair running. The camshafts failure are notorius for that engine, don’t buy i would say
Thank you so much for your comment. The Volvo 2.8 V6, also known as the PRV (Peugeot-Renault-Volvo) engine, has quite a notorious reputation. Its 90-degree design, originally intended for a V8, caused inherent balance issues that led to that rough idle you mentioned. The camshaft failures, especially due to poor oiling, became a significant weak point, making maintenance a nightmare. Interestingly, it found its way into cars like the DeLorean, which struggled with similar issues. For enthusiasts looking for reliability and performance, it’s no wonder this engine gets a big thumbs down. We appreciate you sharing your insight! Let’s keep the conversation going-tell us about your favorite or least favorite engines in the comments. And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engaging discussions. Hope to see you in our next video! Wishing you an awesome weekend filled with horsepower and great memories. Stay tuned
2.7 was shit because the water pump was run of the timing chain, the TIGHT side of it... chain harmonics kill the bearings of the pump 3.1 gm was not shit, nor was the 3.8, or the "duke", or the rotary.... every 3.6 issue ive encountered was due to "gas and go" soccermom mentality (marginal if any maintainence, and oil changes)
Thanks for sharing your insight! You’ve hit the nail on the head regarding the 2.7 - that water pump design was a ticking time bomb. Running it off the tight side of the timing chain was an engineering oversight that doomed the bearings to premature failure. Chain harmonics and stress were indeed major contributors, making regular maintenance essential for prolonging its life-though even that wasn’t always enough. The 3.8, in particular, gained a reputation for durability and even powered some memorable performance models with the supercharged L67 variant. You also make a valid point about the "duke" 2.5 and GM’s rotary efforts. While the "Iron Duke" wasn’t flashy, it was a reliable workhorse. The rotary, though short-lived, showcased GM’s innovation at the time. Your comments on the 3.6 are spot-on. It’s a strong engine, but the "gas-and-go" mindset leads to problems, especially with timing chain wear and oil consumption. Regular maintenance and proper oil levels are critical to keeping it running smoothly. Let’s keep this conversation rolling! Share your experiences, like this video, and don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters....
I had a Chrysler new Yorker 3.0 engine I bought it at 79,000 miles burning oil I was adding one qt every week then at 130,000 miles then I was adding 2 or qts a week then at 197,000 miles it just cut off and stop running 😢 but very reliable car
Thank you so much for sharing your experience with the Chrysler New Yorker It's always interesting to hear about the longevity of cars, especially when they're pushing through issues like oil consumption. The 3.0 engine, while known for its durability, wasn't immune to some of the common issues that can arise as cars age, like oil burning. It's impressive that it kept going as long as it did before finally calling it quits at 197,000 miles! Even though it had its share of challenges, the fact that it was a reliable ride for you really speaks to the quality of Chrysler's engineering back then. To everyone reading, if you have your own muscle car stories or experiences with engines like the 3.0 Chrysler, please feel free to share in the comments below Don’t forget to hit that like button, share this video, and subscribe for more amazing American Muscle Car content. Let’s keep this conversation rolling and celebrate these legendary machines
Hey there! Thanks for your feedback on the ads - we totally understand where you’re coming from! But we’re always listening and open to ways to make the experience even better for you within what’s possible under RUclips's guidelines. Let us know if you have other ideas or suggestions - we’re here for it. Thank you.
strange, i've not seen one... in 10 years... maybe your using your browser wrong. hint: INSTALL AN AD BLOCKER, the internet (web sites ARE NOT USABLE without one)
Nothing really wrong with the Ford 4.2 V8 they just deliberately made it underpowered. Virtually anything you can do with any Windsor V8 would improve even the 255.
there’s nothing inherently wrong with the Ford 4.2 V8 (the 255). It was built during tough times for performance engines, with emissions regulations and fuel economy taking the front seat. But here’s the good news: it shares the Windsor DNA With upgrades like a better camshaft, headers, and a 4-barrel carb, you can unlock its true potential. Windsor engines love mods, and the 255 is no exception. Keep the conversation going Share your favorite builds, comment your thoughts, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead goodness. Hope to see you in the next video, have an awesome day
@A.LeeMorrisJr Thanks for sharing your insight the GM 3800 is well-known for its reliability, often regarded as one of the most durable V6 engines of its time. It did shine in terms of longevity, but as you pointed out, it could feel a bit underpowered in heavier cars, especially when compared to some of the beefier V8s we love in muscle cars. That said, its efficiency and smooth operation made it a favorite for many enthusiasts. If you’re into exploring more powerful classics, what’s your take on GM’s small block V8 or the iconic LS-series engines? Let’s keep the muscle car discussion going! Everyone else watching, let us know your favorite GM engines, drop a comment, and don’t forget to share this video. Subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more deep dives into the cars and engines that define the golden age of American horsepower Have a a great day.
@jimlangley4779 That’s awesome The '89 Thunderbird LX was a gem in Ford’s lineup-luxurious yet sporty, with that smooth ride that made it stand out. It’s great to hear your mother’s car held up so well, 126,000 miles with no problems is impressive! Ford really nailed reliability with those models, especially with their V6 and optional V8 engines. They truly don’t make them like they used to By the way, we’re diving deep into American muscle cars like the Thunderbird here on Muscle Car Masters. What’s your favorite memory of that LX? We’d love to hear more stories like yours in the comments. And to everyone else, let’s keep the muscle car legacy alive, comment with your favorite classic, share this with fellow car enthusiasts, and make sure to hit that subscribe button for more incredible car stories and content. Let’s keep this community roaring...have a great weekend.
Great point....The 3.5 EcoBoost did face its fair share of challenges, and you're absolutely right-cam phaser issues were a hot topic. While the timing chain itself often held up, the phasers sometimes couldn't keep up with the engine's high performance demands, leading to that infamous 'rattling' sound during startup. Ford tackled this with updates over the years, especially on newer generations. Despite these hiccups, the 3.5 EcoBoost has proven itself as a powerhouse, delivering impressive torque and horsepower while maintaining solid efficiency. To everyone out there-what’s your take on Ford’s EcoBoost engines? Share your experiences or thoughts in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome engine talk and muscle car history. Thanks for being part of our community-your input fuels our passion. Have a fantastic weekend, and we can’t wait to see you in the next video. Stay awesome
@@Bill-mj8hf Great point, The Ford 3.5 EcoBoost, like the 5.4, has had its ups and downs. Cam phaser issues and that infamous startup rattle stirred debates, but Ford made strides to improve durability in later versions. Still, the 3.5 EcoBoost remains a torque-packed powerhouse with remarkable efficiency and reliability when maintained properly. What do you think about Ford’s EcoBoost engines? Got any stories or favorites? Drop them in the comments Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic car talk. Stay legendary, have an amazing day, and hope to see you in the next video....
Yes, the 3.8 GM engine has earned a loyal fanbase! It's a powerhouse of durability and efficiency, especially in its later years. However, earlier versions had their fair share of challenges, like intake manifold issues and head gasket problems that left many owners frustrated. Over time, GM refined the 3.8 into one of the most reliable V6 engines out there, proof that even a rough start doesn’t define a legacy. This discussion highlights why we need all voices in the Muscle Car community. Every engine has its story good, bad, and misunderstood and together, we can uncover them all. Drop your thoughts, experiences, or favorite engines in the comments. Don’t forget to share this video with fellow car enthusiasts and subscribe for more deep dives into the legends of American Muscle Cars. Thanks for being part of the ride, and have an amazing day Hope to see you in the next video
The 2.5L non-turbo Subaru engine had its fair share of issues-primarily head gasket problems. Subaru enthusiasts often say it wasn’t built to handle as much as its turbocharged counterpart, which had reinforced internals. Interestingly, the turbo 2.5 engines found in models like the WRX and STI were more robust, with better cooling and head gasket durability, making them the go-to choice for performance fans. The non-turbo version, while reliable for daily driving, just couldn’t handle stress as well over time, especially under poor maintenance. For us American Muscle fans, it’s like comparing a small-block Chevy that’s bone stock to one built for racing-engineering makes all the difference What’s your take on reliability versus performance? Drop a comment below, share this with fellow car enthusiasts, and don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into engine stories. Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day...
Thanks so much for your comment The 3000 Essex V6 is definitely a unique engine with a lot of history, and we appreciate you sharing your experience. It's interesting to think about how engines like that have contributed to the evolution of muscle cars. While we don't always get to cover every engine, we love hearing about all the diverse options that made muscle cars what they are today If you have more insights about the Essex V6 or any other engines you think deserve more attention, feel free to drop them in the comments below. We’re always looking for more interesting stories and technical details to share with the community. Remember to like, comment, and share with fellow muscle car fans. And don’t forget to subscribe to stay updated on all our latest content about American muscle cars! Your support helps us keep the conversation going. Thanks again for being part of the Muscle Car Masters community
Hey there, thanks for sharing your thoughts You’re absolutely right-the first engine shown in the video, while flawed in some ways, was pivotal in GM’s history. Engines like the Buick 3800 V6, for example, may not have been perfect at first, but their later versions became legendary for reliability and performance, literally keeping GM alive during tough times. Sometimes, even the most criticized engines play a major role in automotive history, and that’s part of what makes this journey so fascinating for us muscle car fans. We’d love to hear what engine YOU think saved GM or even changed the game for muscle cars. Drop your thoughts below, share this video with your friends, and don’t forget to hit that subscribe button to keep these epic conversations alive. Thanks for being part of the Muscle Car Masters community! Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day, and keep cruising
The Buick 3300 series engine was one of the best engines ever built for semi-compact cars it was a awesome engine and besides routine maintenance it lasted 430,000 MI all that ever had to be done to it was a water pump and a starter
Thanks for sharing your experience with the Buick 3300 series engine It truly is one of the underrated gems of the muscle car world. With that kind of longevity 430,000 miles on just routine maintenance-it’s clear that Buick built something special. The 3300 was designed for efficiency and durability, making it an ideal engine for semi-compact cars of its time. That’s the heart of American muscle, reliability with power. If you're a fan of classic engines like this, drop a comment below, share your thoughts, and don't forget to subscribe for more deep dives into muscle car history. Let’s keep the passion for these iconic machines alive...
Thank you for sharing your experience with the 3800 engine and others like the 2.5, 3.1, and 2200 The 3800 truly earned its reputation as a powerhouse, delivering reliability and performance. The 2200 was solid, though it seems the ICM issue was a common hiccup for many owners. It’s fascinating how these engines shaped GM’s lineup through the years. Muscle Car fans, what’s your take? Share your stories about these engines in the comments your insights fuel this community Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more muscle car history and fun. Hope to see you in the next videos, have a great day....
@MuscleCarMasters68 the 3.1 I had they were a great engine always ran great and I done the maintenance on them the 2.5 was a beast of an engine I had it in a couple of cars and it done great and kept the maintenance up also
@@tommybutler7669 Thank you for sharing your experience with the 3.1 and 2.5 engines-two unsung heroes in GM's lineup. It’s amazing to hear how good maintenance kept these engines running strong-something every gearhead can appreciate. Muscle Car fans, let’s hear your stories! Whether you’ve had a 3.1, a 2.5, or even the mighty 3800 under the hood, share your experiences in the comments. Have a good day, we are waiting for more information from all fans to claim whether is failed or not. Thank you so much.
@MuscleCarMasters68 the 3.1 I had it never gave any type of issues with it I kept up with maintenance everytime had to the 2.5 I had in a celebrity and she was a good engine I ended up putting another one in that car due to a hole in the block and the 3800 that was a strong engine had over 225k on miles and I ended up dropping a cylinder on the engine but I had great luck with them
@@tommybutler7669 Thanks for sharing your story! The 3.1, 2.5, and 3800 engines really show what GM was capable of when they put reliability at the forefront. The 3800, in particular, is known for its toughness, and getting 225k miles is no small feat! It’s awesome to hear that with good maintenance, these engines kept running strong. It’s always a bit of luck too, right? If you have more information, pls share it with us... have a good day hope to see you next time.
So much insinformation here. Many of these problems blown out of proportion by the speaker here. It seems like he went to "Consumer Reports" or some other car maintenance monitoring site and got info on basic engine problems, then plotted all the consequential issues that could result if a basic problem was left unchecked. A prime example is the Toyota 3VZ-E. He displayed pictures of any Toyota 3VZ engine except the one he wanted to crap on. He errored in naming the actual engine designation and its use in particular vehicles, then "listed" everything he knew that could happen as a result of a blown head gasket. He failed to realized (as many other misinformed people - negligent original owners and ignorant secondary owners, dumb repair technicians, and dedicated rock-climbers) or inform his viewers that Toyota had an active recall on the 3VZ-E in Four Runners and Pickups, and they replaced head gaskets in those vehicles with mileage in excess of 100,000 miles - free of charge. This is personal experience. With my head gasket replaced at 103,000 miles, my truck now has 370,000 miles with no further head gasket issues. this video should be titled "THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN TO THESE ENGINES IF YOU DON'T PROPERLY MAINTAIN THEM." Try starting with late model vehicles that has turbocharged engines and instruct people on how to manage the flaws in those engines because there will be many, and manufacturers will not accept responsibility for their poorly designed products.
Thank you for sharing your detailed feedback and personal experience! It’s crucial to address misinformation and provide accurate context, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify. You’re absolutely right about the Toyota 3VZ-E. Toyota’s recall program for head gasket replacements in the 3VZ-E engines in 4Runners and Pickups is a key point that should have been highlighted. Your truck reaching 370,000 miles after a recall repair is a testament to the durability of these engines when properly maintained. The title suggestion, focusing on maintenance, is spot-on. Many engine problems are indeed magnified when regular upkeep is neglected. Late-model turbocharged engines, as you noted, often require meticulous care to manage inherent flaws, and their manufacturers aren’t always transparent about these issues. We strive to bring accurate, engaging content to our viewers. In future videos, we’ll emphasize preventative maintenance and delve deeper into issues like turbocharged engine care and how to identify manufacturer recalls. To our community: if you’ve had similar experiences with engines that exceeded expectations after maintenance, or if you have tips for managing flaws in newer engine designs, let us know in the comments. Your stories are invaluable. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engaging discussions, accurate information, and fascinating stories from enthusiasts like you. Together, we can build a knowledgeable and vibrant car community....
Thanks so much for sharing your experience with the Cadillac V8-6-4 It’s great to hear from someone with firsthand knowledge of this unique engine. The V8-6-4 was definitely ahead of its time, pioneering the technology of cylinder deactivation, but it had its share of challenges, particularly with reliability and complexity. It was introduced in the 1981 Cadillac Seville and could switch between 8, 6, or 4 cylinders, aiming to improve fuel efficiency without compromising performance. Unfortunately, the system was often prone to malfunction and did not last long in the Cadillac lineup. For anyone tuning in, if you're interested in the full story behind the V8-6-4, its impact on Cadillac's reputation, and how it compares to other performance innovations of its era, drop a comment below Let’s keep this conversation going-don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more in-depth discussions about American muscle cars We’d love to hear your thoughts on this groundbreaking engine
the 3.5 ecoboost shouldnt be on here even the first model was a good engine if maintained correctly. gotta love ppl that buy a turbocharged engine and think they never need to change the oil
You're spot on The 3.5 EcoBoost is a solid performer when cared for properly-regular oil changes are key for any turbocharged engine! Neglecting basic maintenance often gives great engines a bad rep. The early EcoBoost models faced criticism, but much of it boiled down to improper upkeep. Ford really packed power and efficiency into this V6, making it a game-changer. Let’s hear from everyone-what's your take on turbocharged engines in muscle cars? Drop a comment, share your stories, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead fun Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day....
Thanks for your comment! Disagreements like this fuel the passion we all share for classic American Muscle Cars. The 2.5 Iron Duke, 3.8 Buick V6, and Chevy 305 V8 have sparked endless debates. While the Iron Duke was loved for its fuel efficiency, it struggled in performance. The 3.8 V6, especially the turbo versions, brought some serious power later on, but early reliability issues caused doubts. The 305, while not as exciting as its big-block brothers, served as a reliable base for countless builds. Let’s keep the discussion alive what are your thoughts on how these engines performed in muscle cars or daily drivers? We’d love to hear your experiences. Drop your knowledge in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars to keep this conversation roaring. Hope to see you in the next video. Stay legendary, and have a great day
Thank you for pointing that out We always aim to showcase the most accurate information and visuals, so we appreciate you catching this. The 1.0L Suzuki engine we referenced is a unique piece of engineering history, especially with its lightweight design and remarkable efficiency for its size. It’s fascinating how such compact engines can punch above their weight, even earning a spot in discussions alongside bigger performance beasts! We’ll work on improving the visuals in future videos to better match the engines we talk about. Your input helps make our channel even better for the entire muscle car community. Let us know if there’s another engine or topic you’d like us to dive into-your feedback fuels us! Keep the comments rolling, share with fellow car enthusiasts, and don’t forget to subscribe for more! Hope to see you in the next video. Have an awesome day, gearheads...
Could have made it alot shorter. Basicly every engine produced by GM since 1970 Almost every engine of the same vintage made by Ford. All rotary engines.
Thanks for the comment. You’re right-there were a lot of engines from GM and Ford in that era that had their fair share of issues, especially as automakers scrambled to meet emissions regulations and fuel economy standards. Engines like the GM 305, some of the smog-strangled 350s, and Ford’s 351M certainly had their critics. And yes, rotary engines had their own reliability quirks, though Mazda stuck with them for a while. But let’s not forget the gems of that time! The Chevy LS6 454, Ford’s Boss 351 Cleveland, and even the underrated AMC 401 showed how powerful engines could still thrive. They proved there were exceptions to the struggles of the ‘70s. What are your thoughts on which engines deserved better reputations? Drop a comment, share your favorites, and don’t forget to subscribe for more muscle car history Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day...
There are actually 3 different versions of the Buick 3800 engine one was great the others were junk. One version only lasted 2 years it was such a piece of crap. It had a 92% failure rate for 5 years of operation.
There were indeed three versions of the Buick 3800, and each had its own story. The Series I was a solid engine, known for its reliability and strong performance. It laid the groundwork for the 3800's reputation. Then came the Series II, a true powerhouse that balanced efficiency and performance, earning its place as one of the best V6s ever made. However, the Series III had its share of issues, particularly in the early runs. If you’re talking about the infamous first-generation 3800, its short lifespan and high failure rate were due to design flaws like head gasket problems and cooling inefficiencies.
Yes, the 5.4 Triton 2V was a reliable workhorse! It powered countless 10th-generation F-150s that are still hauling, towing, and running strong today. Its robust design, with a forged crankshaft and iron block, made it durable under heavy loads. Ford’s modular engine platform also made parts readily available, further boosting its longevity. While some experienced spark plug or coil pack issues, proper maintenance kept them going for hundreds of thousands of miles. It’s a testament to Ford’s engineering. What’s your experience with this engine? Comment below, share your thoughts, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more... Have a good day.
The 4.0L DOHC V6, especially the version used in models like the Ford Explorer, definitely deserves attention for its timing chain issues. Ford's choice of plastic timing chain guides in this engine led to premature wear, often resulting in rattling sounds and, eventually, failure if not addressed early. For those who owned these engines, the repair could be costly since it often involved removing the engine to replace the guides and chains-a major headache for what’s otherwise a powerful engine with strong torque. Thanks for bringing this up! If anyone else has had experience with the 4.0L V6 or other engines known for timing chain problems, drop your stories in the comments below. And for more discussions like these on engines, maintenance tips, and American Muscle Car history, don't forget to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters...
Honestly, I can’t believe everyone overlooks the 4.0 DOHC V6 when it’s had some of the most notorious timing chain failures. Everyone’s hyped about its power, but what’s power worth if you’re constantly worried about that chain giving out? In my book, reliability should count for a lot more than hype, and this engine has proven to be way too risky for serious muscle car fans.
@@KeithGreene-k1v Absolutely, you’ve got a solid point about the 4.0 DOHC V6. Power alone doesn't make up for the risks involved, especially with an engine as infamous for timing chain issues as this one. Ford’s use of plastic chain guides really put this engine on the map for reliability concerns, as those guides would often wear down far too quickly, leading to that dreaded chain rattle. If left unchecked, it could even lead to catastrophic failure, sidelining an otherwise powerful engine. And you're right-reliability matters a lot in the muscle car world! Many enthusiasts who want that classic American power also expect their engines to last, especially with the investment of time and money in these builds. While the 4.0 V6 delivers impressive torque, this kind of maintenance risk makes it a tough sell for serious muscle car fans who value dependability. If anyone else has experiences with timing chain issues in the 4.0L or other engines with similar quirks, we’d love to hear your story! Join the conversation below, and remember to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more insights on engine builds, maintenance, and the history that makes American Muscle so legendary. Thanks again for sparking this great discussion....
Boy , what a bunch of crap has been built and unleashed on the public. The engineers and accountants and corporate greed goons should feel the cost out of their salaries.
Thank you for sharing your passionate thoughts It’s true that some of the decisions made in the muscle car era were driven by a mix of innovation, cost-cutting, and sometimes corporate missteps. We’ve seen brilliant engineering paired with compromises due to financial constraints, leaving behind both legends and lessons. Engines like the Oldsmobile 5.7L Diesel or the Vega’s aluminum-block motor remind us how innovation can stumble under pressure. But let’s not forget, those same companies also delivered iconic machines like the HEMI, Boss 429, and LS6 Chevelle that continue to awe us today. This community thrives on discussions like these Let us know what’s your favorite (or least favorite) example of engineering decisions gone wrong? Your thoughts help keep this passion alive, so don’t forget to comment, share your stories, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters Together, we’ll keep these memories-and debates-roaring
The 305 V8 definitely has its place in muscle car history Known for its durability and versatility, it powered everything from Camaros to trucks, proving itself as a dependable workhorse. While it might not boast the raw power of the 350, its smaller bore made it a reliable, efficient option for daily drivers and weekend warriors alike. But hey, muscle car fans-what do you think? Share your take in the comments Let’s keep this engine debate alive. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic discussions. Hope to see you in the next video, have an amazing day
Thank you, @jimlangley4779, for your insightful comment! You're absolutely right, solid development and research are key to producing legendary engines. That’s why the iconic American muscle cars we love, like the Ford 410 V8 or the HEMI engines, stand the test of time. These were crafted with passion and precision, not just to perform but to roar with power. so great when you gave us a lot of meaningful information, hope to see you next videos.
Thank you for your comment and sharing your thoughts on the 1980 Chevy (GMC) 5.7 Diesel engine Indeed, it has a controversial reputation, often labeled as one of GM's more challenging designs. Its conversion from a gas engine to a diesel without robust modifications led to reliability issues, but it was also a bold experiment in the era of rising fuel prices. We appreciate your insights! What’s your take on other GM engines from that time? Let us know in the comments, and don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more classic car stories... Have a great day.
Thanks for pointing that out, @jimlangley4779 the Quad 4 was an innovative Oldsmobile engine introduced in the late ’80s, known for its high-revving DOHC design and impressive performance for a four-cylinder. While not a traditional “muscle car” engine, it played a unique role in GM’s history and showed how Oldsmobile pushed engineering boundaries. Speaking of muscle cars, let us know your favorite American V8 powerhouse Everyone here, keep the conversation alive, comment your thoughts, share with fellow car enthusiasts, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome insights and stories about these legendary machines....
bruh i have to completely disagree on the chrysler 2.7l v6 with you bro! my aunt had a 96 sebring and i think that thing is still on the road! it is a 1 one of a kind sebring because it has a bmw where the chrysler logo was on the grille.. my aunt sold it with about 180,000 miles on it because the ragtop was shot it ran pefect without ever having a head gasket blow..... i actually saw it on the road before with a new black ragtop on it... if my aunts old sebring made it to 180k before she got rid of it and still ran without that head gasket thing happening you are incorrect sir!
Hey there Thanks for sharing your experience with the Chrysler 2.7L V6 in your aunt’s ’96 Sebring, it’s great to hear that some of these engines went the distance. You’ve got a unique story with that custom BMW logo on the grille! While your aunt’s Sebring hitting 180k without head gasket issues is impressive, it’s worth noting the 2.7L earned its reputation for trouble due to oil sludge problems, often from poor maintenance or design flaws. Many engines didn’t make it that far without issues, but clearly, your aunt's Sebring was a rare gem We love hearing stories like yours, so keep them coming! If anyone else has a unique experience or thoughts, drop a comment below. Don’t forget to share this video with your friends and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome discussions. Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day...
Respect your take, but gotta say, the Vega 2.3 wasn’t all bad. Chevy pushed boundaries with an aluminum block, and while it had flaws, early models showed promise when maintained. I had one, dialed in right, and it ran like a champ for years. Sure, it wasn’t a V8 beast, but it wasn’t meant to be.
Thank you for sharing your firsthand experience with the Vega 2.3-liter engine, @bigfoottoo2841. Many enthusiasts remember that engine’s reliability issues overheating, oil burning, and early wear were common complaints back in the day. Your honest feedback helps everyone here gain a better understanding of the shortcomings that some American cars faced during certain eras. Still, it’s all part of the rich tapestry of automotive history. We’d love to hear from others who’ve had similar or different experiences. Let’s keep this conversation rolling: drop your thoughts in the comments, share this video with fellow car lovers, and don’t forget to subscribe for more American Muscle Car insights...
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! It's true that many enthusiasts and mechanics have raised concerns about certain late-model Chrysler engines. Models like the 2.0L, 2.4L, and 3.7L have indeed faced issues, particularly around durability and excessive use of plastic components that can impact long-term reliability. For example, the 3.7L V6 was notorious for oil sludge build-up if not meticulously maintained, while the 4.7L V8 also had some challenges with cooling and longevity under heavy use. Even the Hemi engines, like the 5.7L and 6.4L, which are praised for performance, aren't free from criticism. Some owners report that the cylinder deactivation (MDS) in the 5.7L can cause lifter and camshaft wear over time, an issue that’s had many switching off MDS to extend the engine’s life. It’s a love-hate relationship for many, appreciating the power but frustrated with the engineering choices. Let us know what you think! Are you a fan of Chrysler’s recent engines, or do you agree that they're over-reliant on plastic components? We’d love to hear your experiences-share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, subscribe, and join us in celebrating all things muscle....
While some Chrysler engines had issues, labeling them all as 'junk' seems a bit harsh. The 5.7L HEMI, for instance, has a strong reputation for performance and reliability when properly maintained, and the 6.4L HEMI is known for its impressive power output in the performance market. Chrysler’s lineup includes engines that offer a good balance of efficiency and power. Like any brand, some models might have had their setbacks, but many Chrysler engines have shown solid longevity and value when cared for correctly. It’s more about maintenance and usage than just the make of the engine.
Thank you for sharing such a balanced perspective! You’re absolutely right-Chrysler’s lineup, especially the HEMI engines, has achieved a reputation for serious power and performance. The 5.7L and 6.4L HEMIs have been workhorses in the performance world, delivering a satisfying punch for muscle car enthusiasts. And while these engines can handle a lot, maintenance truly makes the difference. For instance, regular oil changes and careful monitoring of the Multi-Displacement System (MDS) can help extend the life of the 5.7L HEMI, especially since MDS-related wear on lifters and camshafts is a known concern among owners. You’re also spot-on about Chrysler’s use of plastic components-this trend has raised some eyebrows in the community. Certain engines, particularly the 2.0L and 2.4L, have been known to struggle with plastic components that just don’t hold up under long-term stress, which can impact durability and drive up repair costs. However, when it comes to the overall lineup, Chrysler has engineered some real performers that, with proper care, deliver fantastic reliability and longevity. So, what’s your take? Have you had any experiences with the MDS system or other Chrysler engines? We’d love to hear more stories, insights, or even those quirks you've encountered under the hood. Keep the conversation going in the comments, hit that like button if you’re passionate about American muscle, and subscribe for more in-depth dives into the engines we love...
The second iteration of the 3.8L engine truly shines as a reliable powerhouse. The first version, while innovative, faced its fair share of challenges-especially in durability. By the second go-round, Buick engineers had it nailed, delivering a durable and efficient V6 that powered everything from muscle cars to family sedans. What do you think about its turbocharged versions? Let’s keep this discussion alive-drop your thoughts below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more epic car talk. Hope to see you in the next video Wishing you horsepower-filled days and a fantastic journey ahead
Thanks so much for sharing your story and experiences with us That stuck EGR valve on the Saturn sounds like a scary situation glad you’re here to tell the tale. It’s interesting to hear from someone who worked at Saturn; you must have some unique insights into those cars. And it’s awesome to hear how much you love your Pontiac Grand Am! They were definitely reliable and had that classic American spirit we all admire in muscle-inspired cars. If you have any more stories or memories about American cars, we’d love to hear them. Everyone watching, let’s keep the conversation going share your favorite car stories or the most reliable muscle cars you’ve owned Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more amazing car history, stories, and reviews. Your support keeps us going..
@MuscleCarMasters68 my first car had posi traction It saved me from killing someone Guy set up to kill my ex-girlfriend You are right about some engines cause worked at different dealships Model have know problem they take off thousand off trade in
Thanks for sharing your incredible story and insights, it’s always fascinating to hear from someone with firsthand dealership experience! Your tale about posi traction saving lives is a powerful reminder of how engineering can make a difference in the real world. And you’re absolutely right about certain models having known issues that affect trade-ins-it’s a side of the industry we don’t always consider. Have a great day... hope to see you next videos.
Man, I gotta say, I’ve owned plenty of cars, but that Grand Am can’t hold a candle to real muscle! Sure, it might’ve been reliable, but where’s the roar, the raw power? I’ll take an old-school GTO or Firebird any day over that 1.9-liter Saturn drama. You want the best Pontiac ever made? Look no further than the '69 Judge.
Hey @darinrodriguez8551, thanks for sharing your thoughts You're right that the 3400 engine had its issues, like blown head gaskets and reliability problems, especially in some of the earlier models. It’s interesting to see how different engines from that era hold up over time, right? But some muscle car enthusiasts still appreciate these cars for their raw power and the nostalgia they bring. The 3400 is part of that muscle car history, even if it wasn't the best on paper. I encourage everyone to share their thoughts below, let's talk more about the cars we love Don't forget to comment, share, and subscribe to the channel for more awesome content on American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the newest videos Have a nice weekend
Hey there! Thanks for your comment The GM 3800 V6 is definitely one of the most legendary engines out there, and if you’ve ever owned one, you know exactly why it’s so beloved. Reliable, efficient, and surprisingly powerful for its size, this engine was a staple in everything from Buicks to Pontiacs, proving its versatility and durability. It wasn’t just about the numbers-it was about how it delivered smooth performance with that distinct GM touch. From the Series I to the supercharged Series II and III, the 3800 carved out a reputation as one of GM’s best V6s, even earning a spot on Ward’s 10 Best Engines list. It's a powerhouse that often punches above its weight! We’d love to hear your thoughts-share your experiences with the 3800 or any other iconic engine in the comments. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe. Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts You make an excellent point about how even engines with issues helped keep people working and contributed to the economy. It's true that many of these "failed" engines, while not perfect, played important roles in their time and led to further innovations. However, like any mechanical system, even the best engines have their share of flaws, and it's important to discuss these openly. That's why I encourage everyone to share their experiences and thoughts, so we can keep the conversation going and dive deeper into the history of these engines. Let’s hear from you all whether you love them or hate them Have a good day.
The Buick 3800 was actually one of the best engines ever built, period.
The Buick 3800 is legendary! Known for its durability, smooth operation, and versatility, it’s a true icon in the engine world. Over its 30-year production run, it powered a wide range of vehicles and consistently proved its reliability, with many reaching 200,000 miles or more without major issues. Its fuel efficiency and power balance made it a standout among V6 engines.
But as with all engines, it wasn't without a few quirks. Some early versions had intake manifold gasket issues, and like many older engines, it could develop coolant leaks over time. However, these minor issues never overshadowed its reputation for being one of the best engines ever made.
If you're a fan of the Buick 3800 or have any stories about it, let us know in the comments! And for more great discussions on iconic American engines, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters-let's keep these memories alive together...
While the Buick 3800 certainly has its merits and a loyal fanbase, calling it one of the best engines ever built might be a bit of a stretch. This engine was known for reliability, yes, but it had its limitations, especially in terms of performance compared to other powerhouses from that era. Its power output and overall refinement were modest, and for true performance enthusiasts, it often fell short of expectations. Other engines, like the Ford 302 or Chevy LS series, offered a better balance of performance, durability, and aftermarket support, making them stronger contenders for the title of 'best ever.'
The Buick 3800 does indeed shine in its reliability, smooth operation, and remarkable fuel efficiency, making it a staple in the engine world for over three decades. While it's true the 3800 wasn’t necessarily designed for high performance compared to legends like the Ford 302 or Chevy LS, it carved out a different niche-serving as a reliable workhorse rather than a powerhouse.
In fact, the 3800 earned its reputation in everyday driving, where its longevity and ease of maintenance made it a favorite among drivers who valued consistency. It was versatile too, powering everything from family sedans to sports coupes. Though it didn’t lead in horsepower, its balance of fuel economy, smooth operation, and durability gave it a legendary status, especially among V6 engines.
Let's hear from you-do you agree, or do you have your own Buick 3800 stories? Drop a comment! And if you want more dives into the engines that powered American muscle and beyond, be sure to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters. Let’s keep the conversation going and celebrate these icons together...
I agree 100%, plus great gas mileage!
I can't understand why they classified the Buick 3800 as a poor engine.
the 3800 is not a bad engine. I mean... everyone knows its good so idk what you are talking about. I also had one so I know first hand that its bulletproof.
im not convinced you guys are doing any real research and are just throwing whatever at the wall
@@kylersmith5551 The 3800 is indeed a powerhouse of reliability, and you're right-it's known for being incredibly durable, with many fans considering it nearly bulletproof! Many people have had great experiences, especially with its balance of performance and longevity.
But alongside that, like any engine, it’s not without a few common issues that can crop up over time. Some 3800s, especially in later series, have been known to have issues with intake manifold gaskets and coolant leaks. However, many of these are manageable with regular maintenance.
Thank you for sharing your firsthand experience! It’s always valuable to hear directly from enthusiasts who’ve been behind the wheel. And hey, if anyone else has a 3800 story or insight, drop it in the comments! Let’s keep this discussion going. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more in-depth looks at classic engines and muscle car lore!
While the 3800 is known for its durability and has a solid reputation, it's not without its issues-especially in certain models and under specific conditions. Some owners have experienced intake manifold gasket problems and issues with plastic coolant elbows. It's a great engine in many respects, but like any, it has its quirks. Sounds like you had a good experience, though, which is awesome...
The 3800 engine is a fantastic example of a well-engineered powerplant that delivers on both performance and reliability. Known for its solid construction and resilience, it’s earned its reputation as one of GM’s most dependable engines, particularly for its smooth power delivery and fuel efficiency.
But as you pointed out, no engine is entirely perfect. Intake manifold gasket issues and those pesky plastic coolant elbows are indeed common challenges, especially in Series II models. Thankfully, these quirks are well-known in the community, and there are durable aftermarket solutions available that help mitigate these issues. Regular maintenance can also go a long way in keeping the 3800 running smoothly and extending its already impressive lifespan.
Thank you so much for sharing your experience! Your story adds real value to the discussion. To everyone watching, if you've got a 3800 tale-good or bad-share it below! And if you’re enjoying these deep dives, be sure to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more insights and stories that celebrate the engines and legends of the American muscle era.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 Sure, I get why the 3800 has fans-it’s durable and efficient for many. But I’ve found it to be a bit overrated, especially when comparing its performance to other engines in GM’s lineup. The intake manifold gasket and coolant elbow issues aren’t minor; they’re recurring headaches that can lead to costly repairs if ignored. While aftermarket solutions help, they shouldn’t be necessary if the original design was up to par. It’s a solid engine, but I think its reputation sometimes overshadows some clear flaws. Curious if anyone else has experienced similar issues or has had a different take?
Why isn’t the Chevy Vega mentioned? I became a pro at replacing its head gasket. That engine kept me busy, and I mastered the skill! The Vega was infamous for its issues, especially with the head gasket. It was a challenge, but it taught me a lot about repairs. Seems like it deserves a spot in the discussion for memorable engine experiences.
While the Vega’s issues with the head gasket were definitely notorious, it seems like engines like the Northstar or the Cummins with the killer dowel pin deserve a bit more attention here. Those engines brought challenges on an entirely different scale-think costly repairs and the potential for total engine failures. Compared to these, the Vega’s head gasket replacements, though frustrating, feel like more manageable issues. So maybe the focus should be on the engines that presented bigger risks and headaches for owners.
The Chevy Vega had its fair share of engine troubles, especially with that infamous head gasket issue, which kept a lot of DIYers like yourself busy. The Vega’s aluminum block without iron sleeves and its unique cooling challenges certainly made it memorable in terms of repairs and durability lessons. Many mechanics from that era probably honed their head gasket skills thanks to this engine alone!
But you hit the nail on the head about memorable engine experiences-it’s about the scale and complexity of the problems too. Engines like the Northstar or Cummins with the “killer dowel pin” often involved higher-stakes failures and much costlier repairs. In the Vega’s case, even though replacing the head gasket was a recurring pain, it typically didn’t spell total disaster the way some other engines did. Still, it’s a great call to bring up the Vega here because it represents a classic era of hands-on learning for car lovers.
We’d love to hear more stories like this! If anyone else has memorable engine experiences, or stories of overcoming notorious repairs, share them here. And remember to comment, share, and subscribe for more on classic car engines and the wild stories behind them.
@@KeithGreene-k1v "While it's true that engines like the Northstar and Cummins had their fair share of high-stakes issues, I’d argue that the Vega’s head gasket problem still stands out for a few reasons. The Vega was notorious because the issue was practically guaranteed to occur-meaning nearly every owner had to deal with it. This wasn’t just a ‘risk’ but almost a certainty, and it happened at a time when Chevy was pushing for innovation with an aluminum block that ultimately fell short. For those who owned one, the constant repairs made the Vega memorable, even if the cost was lower. It wasn't just a repair; it was an ongoing saga, and that's what made it infamous.
Honestly, I think the Vega's head gasket issues were actually kind of overblown compared to some of the real problem engines out there. Sure, it was a hassle, but it didn’t have the high-stakes, catastrophic potential of the Northstar’s infamous head bolt issues or the Cummins 'killer dowel pin' problem. Those engines were ticking time bombs that could take out the entire engine if things went wrong, costing way more in repairs. The Vega was a hassle, no doubt, but at least you knew what you were dealing with-it wasn't like the gamble of a complete engine failure. If anything, it’s these higher-stakes engines that deserve more of the spotlight for their risk factor and repair bills.
@@KeithGreene-k1v Actually, I have to side with you on this one-the Vega's head gasket issue was practically a guarantee, not just a possibility, and that alone makes it infamous in a way that the Northstar and Cummins can't quite match. Those engines had their "ticking time bomb" moments, sure, but with the Vega, every single owner knew they'd be dealing with that head gasket at some point. Chevy’s push for an aluminum block was ambitious, but it just wasn’t up to the task. It wasn’t just a repair; it was almost a rite of passage for Vega owners, a saga you couldn’t avoid, and that level of inevitability is exactly why it’s still so memorable in the car community.
3800 is a great engine
The 3800 series 1,2, supercharged and NA, rank GM's #1 engine ever made, and is in the top 10 best engines EVER MADE.
The only problems I ever encountered with the 3800 were the intake gaskets leaking and the plastic cooling elbows for the heater hoses. Once you replaced those 2 items, you head an incredibly reliable engine that had good power and awesome fuel economy for its time. As far as crankshaft sensors failing, the 3800 was not the only engine with that problem, and it was an easy, inexpensive repair. Despite this video bashing the 3800, it was one of GMs best engines since the small block V8.
One of the very best.
Y’all are missing the point
The 3800 earned its respect yeah, plastic elbows and intake gaskets were headaches, but once fixed? Bulletproof. GM nailed reliability and efficiency here. Compared to today’s complex messes, the 3800 is simple, strong, and proven....lol...
The GM 2.2 OHV was reliable.Same with the 3100,Fel Pro and Dorman came out with upgraded intake manifold gaskets made out of metal to fix the intake manifold gasket problem.That Jaguar V12,lot of them were yanked out replaced with a 350 Chevy.The GM 2.5 was good
You're absolutely right about the GM 2.2 OHV and the 3100 engines
Both earned a reputation for reliability once that notorious intake manifold gasket issue was addressed. Props to Fel-Pro and Dorman for stepping up with those upgraded metal gaskets-proof that the aftermarket world knows how to solve problems! The Jaguar V12 swaps are a classic story, with many owners opting for the bulletproof Chevy 350 for its simplicity and power. As for the GM 2.5 'Iron Duke,' it was an unsung hero-rugged, efficient, and a go-to workhorse for many GM vehicles.
We love hearing stories like this! Muscle cars are all about ingenuity and passion. Got more experiences or knowledge to share? Drop them in the comments! Don’t forget to share this video and hit that subscribe button to join the American Muscle Cars family.
See you in the next video, and have a fantastic day
While many muscle car fans dismiss GM's smaller engines, the 2.2 OHV and 2.5 Iron Duke were underrated workhorses. They offered durability and easy maintenance. The 3100 V6 improved reliability with upgraded Fel Pro gaskets. Unlike temperamental Jaguar V12s swapped for Chevy 350s, these engines earned their keep with simplicity and dependability over raw power.
I've had so many 3800s never fail. I know what y'all are talking about.
Thank you for your comment. GM's 3800 V6 is one of the most dependable engines ever made. It’s a testament to solid engineering, delivering both performance and reliability for decades. Whether it was in a Buick Regal, Pontiac Bonneville, or even the Grand National, this engine proved its worth with millions of loyal fans like you! From the Series I to the supercharged Series II, the 3800 had the muscle to power through the miles and keep going strong. And for those who gave it the right care? Forget about failures-it was practically unstoppable!
We’d love to hear more about your experiences with the 3800. What models were they in, and do you have a favorite memory? Let’s keep this gearhead conversation rolling! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engine talk and classic car content.
Hope to see you in the next video-have an amazing weekend....
That engine’s a legend in its own right. Sure, it ain’t a high-revving small block or a big, throaty V8, but the 3800 is bulletproof
I’ve seen ‘em go 300k miles without missing a beat. They’re torquey, reliable, and a sleeper gem in cars like the Grand Prix GTP. You think American Muscle is just about horsepower? Reliability and longevity gotta count for something, too
@@AilaniMadden GM's 3800 V6 deserves legendary status for its reliability and longevity. No engine is truly indestructible, but with proper care, the 3800 has proven it can outlast many. Its torque and versatility made it a hidden gem in cars like the Grand Prix GTP and Buick Regal. From supercharged power to daily dependability, this engine struck a perfect balance.
What’s your favorite 3800-powered ride or memory? Let’s celebrate these unsung heroes together! Comment below, share this video, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome car conversations. See you in the next one
Y’all are overlooking what makes the 3800 special. Sure, the plastic elbows and intake gaskets were a pain, but fix those and you’ve got an engine that’s rock solid.
@@AilaniMadden Absolutely, Ailani! You make a great point about the 3800 engine. While the plastic elbows and intake gaskets were known weaknesses, once those issues are addressed, this engine really shines. Its reputation for reliability, longevity, and low-maintenance needs is hard to beat. The 3800 has powered some incredible cars, and it’s often underrated when compared to some of the bigger, more famous V8s. Whether in the supercharged Grand Prix GTP or the smooth-running Buick Regal, it has proven itself as a dependable, capable powerhouse. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, and I’d love to hear more memories from others
There’s nothing wrong with a 305 engine. The ‘78 to 79 engines lacked power big time. I installed a 4 barrel system off a worn 350 and perked it up. I also had an 85 GMC with 305 4 barrel I purchased new the engine was 10 years old before it gave any trouble
Thank you for your comment. The 305 engine often gets an unfair reputation, but as you pointed out, with a little tweaking, it can hold its own. Adding a 4-barrel system from a 350 is a classic move-proving once again that a little ingenuity can wake up any small block. Your experience with the '85 GMC speaks volumes about the 305's durability. Running strong for a decade without issues shows it was built to last, especially when cared for properly.
The late '70s engines were indeed choked by emissions regulations, but with upgrades like yours, they had the potential to shine. Stories like these remind us why muscle car enthusiasts keep these engines alive and roaring.
Thanks for sharing your insights-keep ‘em coming! Everyone, let’s hear your stories, mods, and favorite memories. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars.
See you in the next video-keep the muscle alive.
The 305 was as reliable as at 3:50 was it just has as much horsepower. Everybody I was a small block Chevys ran forever and ever with very little maintenance so I don’t know where they got this idea from.
@@tomtaylor7484 Hey, thanks again for your comment! You’re absolutely right, the 305 small block often gets overlooked, but it's definitely capable when treated right. Your experience with the '85 GMC proves that these engines can be reliable workhorses, lasting for years with minimal maintenance. It’s all about the right care and a few tweaks, like the 4-barrel upgrade, to really unleash that potential. We know that the emission restrictions of the '70s and '80s didn’t do these engines any favors, but with the right mods, they’re ready to roar.
Thanks for sharing your story. Everyone, drop your thoughts, mods, and memories in the comments, and don’t forget to share and subscribe to keep the muscle car legacy alive
See you in the next video...
had one on a 82 Chevrolet had over 400k when traded
@@williampowell2722 Hey, thanks for sharing your story about the '82 Chevy
Over 400k miles is a true testament to how tough those engines can be when treated right. Like I said before, the 305 small block may not get all the love, but it’s a workhorse. Emission restrictions held it back, but with proper care and a few upgrades like a 4-barrel carb these engines prove they’ve got staying power. Keep those memories coming, and if you’ve got more tips or mods, drop them in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to keep the American muscle car spirit alive.
See you soon, have a great day....
Chevrolet 2300 4 cylinder built from 1971-1977. Aluminum block with a steel cylinder head, and no steel cylinder liners. My grandfather had a Vega wagon with one, then my dad had it, and his mechanic said get rid of it as soon as possible.
Thank you so much for sharing your family’s connection to the Chevrolet 2300 engine! It’s incredible how cars often carry stories across generations. The aluminum block with a steel head was an innovative choice, but it lacked steel cylinder liners, which led to durability concerns especially with improper maintenance or neglect. The Vega's engine earned a reputation for overheating and oil consumption, which mechanics at the time often warned against.
However, it’s worth noting that GM tried to address these issues later, with better cooling systems and improved materials, though the damage to the Vega's reputation had already been done. Some enthusiasts have even rebuilt these engines successfully using aftermarket upgrades to overcome the original flaws.
Let’s hear from others did anyone have better luck with this engine?
Share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more car history and discussions
Sure, no liners was risky, but it paved the way for innovation. With proper maintenance and updates, these engines could last. My uncle had one, and he swore by it for years.
Alright, hear me out, fellow gearheads: everyone dogs on the Chevy Vega’s 2300 4-cylinder, calling it a disaster. But let’s get real, it was ahead of its time! An aluminum block with no steel liners? That’s cutting-edge engineering for the early ’70s. Sure, it had issues, but with proper maintenance and cooling upgrades, it wasn’t hopeless. My grandfather’s Vega wagon ran fine for years. It’s not a V8 monster, but respect it as a stepping stone in GM’s innovation journey...
@@AilaniMadden Thank you for sharing such a thoughtful perspective on the Chevy Vega's 2300 engine
You're absolutely righ, it was cutting-edge for its time, and GM's choice to innovate with an aluminum block showed real ambition, even if it had its pitfalls. Stories like your grandfather’s Vega wagon remind us how proper care could make these engines reliable. Many enthusiasts today even restore and modify them, proving they weren’t hopeless. Let’s hear from others-did you or your family have a Vega or a similar experience? Drop your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars....
I had a Buick Enclave with the 3.6 litre VVT engine. It was horrible! I ended up having it replaced with a junkyard motor. Even with the newer engine, i was still afraid to ever push. We had sooo many problems with that car!
Oh, and as far as the Buick 3800 goes, the later engines were some of the best ever made. But, the old even fire 3.8's were terrible. They were notorious for blowing out the bottom of the motor after 100000 miles.
Thanks for sharing your experience! The 3.6L VVT in the Enclave has been a mixed bag for many. Timing chain issues and oil consumption have frustrated owners, but with proper care, some have had better luck. As for the Buick 3800, you're spot-on! The Series II and III engines are legendary for reliability and power, even rivaling V8s in some builds. The early even-fire 3.8s, though, were a learning curve-prone to bottom-end failures if pushed too hard. Let’s keep this conversation going-comment your favorite engines, share with fellow enthusiasts, and subscribe for more Muscle Car stories. Hope to see you next videos.
Have a good day...
Note on the 3.1 GM V6 the intake manifold gasket did not become a problem until they converted from Green coolant to Dex Cool Orange. Prior to that those engines would last hundreds and thousands of miles with minimal issue had a 94 with that engine that lasted over 300 K with the last 25k being quite abused because of loaning it to a family member before it gave out contrast that with a 96 model of the same car with the same engine and because the intake gasket issue the original engine went to put at 120 k and even trying to rehab it with a new gasket the initial damage did enough damage that I had to replace the engine in a few more months anyway. But the gasket only became a problem when they went to DexCool orange long life antifreeze. If you take the regular green stuff and change it at the proper intervals that engine will last for a very long time.
You're absolutely right about the 3.1 GM V6
That engine was a workhorse with green coolant, but DexCool sure brought its headaches. The intake gasket failures became a nightmare after the switch, with many engines like yours falling victim early. It’s a great reminder that maintenance and proper fluids make all the difference. Thanks for sharing your story-it's a testament to how well these engines can perform when treated right. Let’s hear more stories like this from all of you
Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars
Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day
Gm 3800 is one of the best engines out there and the 2.2 my racing group has had over 80 of them in cavaliers sunfires etc and are one of our favourite race cars only ever had transmission issues
the GM 3800 is a legendary engine, known for its incredible reliability and smooth power delivery. The 2.2, especially in Cavaliers and Sunfires, has earned respect for its performance in the racing community. It's amazing your group has run over 80 of them! Transmission issues can be tricky, but it’s a testament to these engines that they keep pushing hard regardless. Share your favorite racing moments with these cars-we’d love to hear! And to everyone watching, drop your comments, hit that like button, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day...
The main issues my friends encountered with the 3800 were leaking intake gaskets and the plastic cooling elbows for the heater hoses. Once those were replaced, the engine was incredibly reliable, offering solid power and impressive fuel economy for its time. Crankshaft sensor failures happened on other engines too and were an easy, affordable fix.
@@AilaniMadden Thanks for sharing your experience
the 3800 engine is a beast when it comes to reliability, and those common issues like intake gasket leaks and the plastic cooling elbows are something many people overlook. It’s great that your friends had those sorted out, and it’s awesome to hear about the engine’s performance and fuel economy. It’s also interesting that crankshaft sensor failures popped up across other engines, but as you mentioned, they're a quick and easy fix. To all our viewers, drop your thoughts, share your experiences, and let’s keep the conversation going! Don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video, have a great day
305? 3800? This guy is smoking something. Even the Ford 3.8l was a pretty good motor as long as you kept up with the maintenance.
Thank you for your comment and for highlighting the importance of regular maintenance
You’re absolutely right many engines, including the Ford 3.8L, could deliver solid performance with proper care. However, like all engines, they had their quirks. For example, the Ford 3.8L was notorious for head gasket issues, especially in the early '90s, which often arose if routine maintenance wasn’t meticulous. The GM 305 and the 3800 V6 also had their strengths and weaknesses. The 305, while not a powerhouse, was a reliable and fuel-efficient option, while the 3800 earned its reputation as one of GM’s most dependable V6 engines, even spawning a supercharged version for more spirited performance.
The key takeaway? Proper care can make or break an engine’s legacy. Let’s keep the conversation going! Share your experiences with these engines, and don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more insights....
Yes, even Ford's 3.8, despite the head gasket issues, held its own when well-maintained. Not every engine needs to be a fire-breathing monster to earn respect in the muscle car world
3100/3400 intake gaskets 🤢. I replaced way more of them or entire engines due to oil/coolant mixing than I care to remember.
Oh, those 3100/3400 intake gaskets-what a nightmare
You’re absolutely right; those things caused more headaches than they should have. GM's design flaws with the plastic intake gaskets led to coolant and oil mixing disasters, often wrecking engines before their time. It wasn’t just frustrating-it was a wallet drainer for countless owners. The upgraded metal gaskets helped later on, but by then, the damage to the 3100/3400’s reputation was already done. For anyone dealing with these engines, always look for the revised gaskets and check the coolant regularly to avoid costly repairs.
Thank you for sharing your experience-it’s stories like yours that keep the muscle car community alive and kicking
Who does the research for this list? I've been an ASE Certified Master Tech and Diagnostician for over 30 years. I read everything I can to stay up-to-date in the industry. Many of these engines on this list are not engineering failures as many of them functioned as intended over the lifespan they were designed for. The GM 2.2L was meant to be a low cost, low powered economy engine for economy cars with a projected life of 100k miles. Most only saw major issues when reaching higher mileage(150k+) or owners didn't perform maintenance at semi-regular intervals. The same could be said of the famously long-lasting Iron Duke.
The GM 3800 was a great engine, especially the Series II. The only real issue the 3800 had was extremely badly designed and produced intake manifold gaskets. Once you replaced them, the engine was one of the best engines GM ever made. The exact same can be said for its predecessors as far as bad intake gaskets and great longevity in the 3.3L and the 3.1L.
And I'm not a fan of GM.
GM has built some duds, yes, but not most of the ones on this list. The Cadillac 8-6-4 was a dud as was the Northstar with it's leaking, split block and horrendously difficult to change water pump. The 307ci V8 was an underpowered, vacuum hose nightmare of an engine.
All manufacturers have built some duds and sone great engines. ALL engines that are mass produced will and do have design flaws and common points of failure. But if it's a parts manufacturing failure and not an engine design failure, such as GM's fiber plastic intake gaskets, I don't believe you should condemn the engine design as a failure.
The Chrysler 2.7L V6 was a design failure in that it had a badly designed and prone-to-leak water pump that was timing chain driven so thus encased behind the timing cover. When the badly designed water pump failed, it would leak all the engine coolant into the oil sump(oil pan) and cause main/rod bearing failure due to lack of lubrication. That's an example of engine design failure.
Do your research before making these lists. Ask people who have been in the industry for decades. Don't just read someone's anecdotal evidence based on their personal issues with an engine. Ask the professionals.
Thanks for your detailed comment
Your insights as an ASE Certified Master Tech bring great depth to the discussion. You’re absolutely right-many engines labeled "failures" served their purpose when properly maintained. The GM 3800, especially the Series II, is a legendary workhorse once intake gaskets were addressed. Similarly, the Iron Duke proved its worth in longevity and economy.
We aim to engage enthusiasts like you, balancing technical facts with broader perspectives. Your point on distinguishing design failures (like the Chrysler 2.7L's infamous water pump issue) from parts failures is spot-on! Feedback like this helps refine our research, ensuring we honor both engineering triumphs and lessons learned.
Keep sharing your knowledge-it enriches our community! To all viewers, comment below with your experiences, share with fellow gearheads, and hit subscribe to join the Muscle Car Masters family.
Hope to see you in our next video. Have a great day, everyone
Respectfully, I think you’re missing the big picture here. Many engines were great for what they were designed for. Take the Iron Duke cheap, reliable, and ran forever if maintained. Even ‘duds’ like the 8 6 4 showed innovation, just poorly executed. It’s not always the design; sometimes, it’s maintenance or expectations that lead to failure.
@AilaniMadden I am VERY familiar with the various designs and modern innovations of the internal combustion engine as well as newer vehicle EV technology. I've been an ASE Certified Master Tech and Master Diagnostician for over 30 years. I've dealt with all these engines numerous times.
@@knowplay3258 Respectfully, I hear you, but dismissing engines like the 8 6 4 overlooks their potential. GM aimed for efficiency in an era of tightening emissions ambitious for its time. Poor execution doesn’t erase the innovative thinking behind it. Sometimes, innovation stumbles before it soars. Muscle cars thrive on bold risks, even when they miss the mark initially.
@AilaniMadden You seem to have gotten me wrong. I defend many of the motors in the video as not being the badly designed engines and failures the video claims. I have no issue with innovation..with purpose. But, innovation simply for the sake of innovation tends to NOT further any part of engine design. Rather, it tends to waste time and resources. Sometimes, newly innovative engines are a boon to the automotive industry, other times they become the bane of the same industry. The 8 6 4 engine was a bane that cost consumers millions for a virtually untested design..it was rushed and not fully tested to the extent other designs are normally. In later years, we've seen successful attempts of the same technology from Chrysler/Stellantis/FCA with their MDS and GM with both their AFM and DoD systems. All as a result of the lessons learned from the catastrophic failure that was the 8-6-4.
You're dead wrong about the GM 2.2,2.5 and 3800. 2.2 is a good economic engine as is the 2.5 "Iron Duke" is a great economic engine mail trucks use them. And the 3800 is one of the best engines of all time.
Thank you for your passionate response and for sharing your perspective! The GM 2.2, 2.5 'Iron Duke,' and 3800 V6 certainly have their merits, especially in reliability and efficiency. The 2.5 'Iron Duke' was a workhorse, powering everything from mail trucks to compact cars, and the 3800 is undeniably a legend renowned for its durability and versatility in applications ranging from family sedans to supercharged performance models.
That said, as with any engine, they had their quirks. For example, the 2.2 sometimes faced head gasket issues, and the 3800 had occasional intake manifold problems in later versions. Still, their overall legacy speaks volumes.
We'd love to hear more from fans-what’s your experience with these engines? Share your stories, comment, and let’s keep the discussion alive. Don’t forget to subscribe and share with fellow enthusiasts to keep American Muscle Cars thriving...
The GM 2.2 and 2.5 are reliable, sure, but calling them great is a stretch. Mail trucks used the Iron Duke because it was cheap and simple-not powerful. As for the 3800, it’s solid for daily drivers, but 'best engine of all time'? Not in the muscle car world. Give me a screaming V8 like the 289 HiPo or the mighty 426 Hemi any day
I owned a 1990 Beretta GTZ with the Quad 4. Never had an ounce of trouble with it. It was strong and reliable.
Wow, a 1990 Beretta GTZ with the Quad 4
That’s a gem from the era when GM was pushing the boundaries of small displacement performance. The Quad 4 was no joke, boasting up to 180 horsepower in HO form-a big deal for a naturally aspirated 4-cylinder back then. Its DOHC design and robust build made it a force on the streets, earning respect for its power-to-weight ratio and reliability when well-maintained. It’s awesome to hear yours treated you so well-sounds like you got a solid one.
To everyone reading, do you have Quad 4 stories or know someone who rocked a Beretta GTZ? Let us know in the comments, share your experiences, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Let’s keep the conversation rolling.
Hope to see you in our next video, stay passionate about muscle and classics, and have a fantastic day
I had a Chevy beretta GT with the 3100. That little engine was the truth. I was easily able to stay on a mustang GT with the 4.6 butt.
I also had a Buick Enclave with the 3.6 engine. It was the truth too but the water pump did fail about 110,000 miles. Luckily I had an extended warranty that covered the cost. 11 years old I hit the gas it still will break the tires loose and leave rubber on the road.
Had me a 2001 Monte Carlo SS with the 3800 in it. I loved that engine as well. I actually turbocharged that engine and upgraded drivetrain components. I had 600hp going to the front wheels. The car was swift lol. I regret getting rid of that car and it was a rare color too
Wow, you’ve had quite the lineup of legendary GM engines
That 3100 in the Beretta GT punching above its weight against a Mustang GT? Respect! The 3.6 in the Buick Enclave has always been a powerhouse for its size, even with the common water pump issue. Good thing that warranty came through because an 11-year-old SUV still breaking tires loose? That’s saying something
Now, that 3800 in your Monte Carlo SS - turbocharged with 600hp to the front wheels? Absolute beast mode! The 3800 is one of GM’s most underrated engines, and your setup sounds like it was built for pure thrill. Rare color too? You must miss that one for sure
Folks, let us know about your favorite GM rides in the comments. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars.
Stay tuned for more! Hope to see you in the next video, and have an awesome day
I had a Cavalier Z24 with the 3.1 and that was a fast car and got great mileage with no issues up to 175K when I traded it in on my Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8L Series II and drove that car to 250K until it rusted out and I got rid of it. Regular maintenance and not beating on it all the time will get you great life out of these engines.
@@johnkaltinger3922 Great, you've got a real knack for picking legendary GM rides! The 3.1 in your Cavalier Z24 was a workhorse with surprising speed and efficiency. Trading up to the Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8L Series II? That engine is an absolute icon, delivering smooth power and reliability for a quarter-million miles-impressive! Regular maintenance and smart driving really do wonders, and your story proves these engines can go the distance.
The 3800, especially in the Monte Carlo SS, deserves more love. Its versatility, from commuter cars to turbocharged monsters, is unmatched. GM nailed it with this platform
Folks, share your stories in the comments what GM rides left their mark on your life? Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead tales and legendary engines.
Thanks for watching, and stay awesome! Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day, everyone...
I owned 3 Rx7s with the 1.3 ltr rotary engine, and drove them hard. No problems following recommended service under warranty. I added engine flush before every 3 - 4 oil changes, that freed rotor tips from gumming up. Auto trany on one car gave out at 105,000 mi.
Great to hear from someone with hands-on experience with the RX-7's rotary engine! The 1.3L rotary is definitely a unique beast, and you nailed it with the engine flush strategy - that’s a great tip to keep those rotor tips clean and prevent buildup that can cause issues down the road. Following the recommended maintenance schedule under warranty definitely makes a difference with rotary engines, as they have different needs than standard piston engines.
It's interesting that your auto transmission made it to 105,000 miles, especially with how hard you drove it - that’s pretty solid for an RX-7! Rotary engines tend to handle high RPMs well, but it’s the transmission that often feels the wear and tear, especially with aggressive driving.
To everyone watching, if you’ve had similar experiences or tips on maintaining unique engines like the rotary, drop a comment below! We love hearing your insights on keeping these classic machines running smoothly. Don't forget to share and subscribe to keep the conversation going about these legendary cars!
Honestly, I'm with you on the RX-7's rotary being more reliable than people give it credit for. I ran three RX-7s myself, stuck to regular maintenance, and didn’t run into any of the catastrophic failures people love to talk about. The rotary gets a bad rap, but it's all about upkeep. Engine flush every so often? Totally agree - keeps things running smooth and prevents those rotor tips from sticking. And hey, 105K out of the auto tranny? Not bad at all for a car everyone thinks will break down at half that mileage...
@@KeithGreene-k1v Absolutely, you’re right on the money about the rotary engine - maintenance is the real secret to keeping it running strong! The Mazda RX-7’s rotary often gets misunderstood, but as you’ve shown, regular upkeep like engine flushes can go a long way in preserving those rotor seals and keeping the engine humming along smoothly. Rotary engines naturally produce more heat, which can lead to carbon buildup, but by sticking to a solid maintenance plan, many owners - just like you - enjoy years of reliable performance.
The automatic transmission lasting 105,000 miles is impressive! Rotary engines put unique stress on the transmission due to the high-revving nature of the engine, so it's great to hear that Mazda engineering held up to that kind of demand. Plus, it’s a testament to how durable these cars can be if they’re treated right.
For everyone watching, we’d love to hear your experiences with rotary engines or other unique setups you’ve maintained over the years! Let’s keep the discussion alive - drop a comment below, share this video with fellow enthusiasts, and make sure to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more tips and insights on keeping these classic engines alive and well. Thanks for being part of our community!
In Australia we have a rotary its called a rotary cloths line😂😂😂😂
@@garrypritchard1658 I get it, the rotary engine gets a ton of flak, and sure, they’re not everyone’s cup of tea. But let’s be real - a rotary isn’t just some quirky Mazda gimmick; it’s a marvel when maintained properly. The whole “rotary clothesline” joke? Funny, but it doesn’t do justice to what these engines can achieve. I’ve had mine go past 100K miles with regular care, which isn’t the disaster many claim. Sure, it’s not a V8, but it wasn’t designed to be one. It’s an entirely different beast-compact, high-revving, and more reliable than people give it credit for.
The current Ford 1.0L Exoboost is currently causing owners of the Fiesta, Ecosport, and Focuses major headaches with 393,000 under recall because of oil pump failures. There is no current time line for when Ford will be able to effect repairs.
Ford’s 1.0L EcoBoost engine has been a real headache for many owners, with oil pump failures putting over 393,000 vehicles under recall. It’s frustrating for enthusiasts to see modern engines face these kinds of issues, especially when we think back to the rock-solid reliability of classic American muscle cars. Those old-school V8s could take a beating and still keep roaring down the road!
For fans of power and durability, this is why the muscle car era remains unmatched-engines like the 427, 289 HiPo, or the Boss 429 were built to last and deliver raw, untamed performance.
Thank you and Have a good day.
You fell off at the 305 and the 3.8l😅
The block of the 305 is still sought after to this day for racing builds and the 3.8 is still running strong in different cities that I've worked in.
Other than that this is a great video
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
You're absolutely right-both the 305 and the 3.8L have more to them than meets the eye. The 305's small bore and long stroke make it a favorite for racers looking to build high-revving engines, especially in classes where displacement is restricted. And that 3.8L V6? It’s a legend in its own right. From powering Buick Grand Nationals to still hauling in taxis and daily drivers, it’s proof that GM got some things very right.
We appreciate your kind words about the video! It’s fans like you who keep this community alive, sharing insights and keeping the passion for American Muscle Cars burning strong. Let us know what you’d like to see next-your input shapes this channel.
Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe for more muscle car stories and discussions. Hope to see you in the next video
Have a fantastic day
Hey man, gotta respectfully disagree about the 305 and 3.8 being a fall-off. The 305 small block is a legend in the sleeper build world, perfect base for stroker kits, and it's lightweight. As for the 3.8, it’s bulletproof! Buick Grand National made it iconic, and I’ve seen those engines turbocharged to outrun V8s.
@@AilaniMadden thanks for your awesome input
the 305 and 3.8L have their own legendary status. The 305’s versatility in sleeper builds and its lightweight design make it a gem for creative enthusiasts, while the 3.8L V6 has carved its place in history, especially with the Buick Grand National showcasing its turbocharged prowess. It’s insights like yours that keep this community thriving! What’s your favorite sleeper build or turbo mod story? Share it below-we’d love to feature more in future content. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead discussions.
Have a good day.
My uncle had an Olds diesel. It would only start if parked downhill facing forward. After MANY trips to dealer problem was NEVER solved.
Thanks for sharing that story-it's a classic example of the Oldsmobile Diesel's infamous issues! Many owners dealt with hard-starting problems due to design flaws like the weak injection pump and glow plug systems. GM rushed these engines to market, and while they had potential, poor execution hurt their reputation. Did your uncle ever consider retrofitting it with a gas V8 or modifying the fuel system? We'd love to hear more
Let us know your own experiences with tricky engines in the comments below. Don’t forget to share, subscribe, and keep the muscle car spirit alive! Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day
He Oldsmobile early V8 diesel engines. Yes we’re very big problem, by 1981 with the DX block and upgraded head bolts and injection pump. They were quite a reliable vehicle, but by that time they got such a bad reputation nobody bought them.
@@tomtaylor7484 Thanks for sharing your insights on the Oldsmobile V8 diesel. the time the 1981 DX block and upgraded components came along, the damage to its reputation had already been done. The early models suffered from those significant design flaws, including the problematic injection pumps and weak glow plug systems. It's unfortunate because, with proper refinement, they had the potential to be solid engines. I'd love to hear more about any modifications or personal experiences you've had with them
Keep the comments coming, share the videos, and subscribe for more classic American muscle car content! We’re all about preserving these legends.
Thanks again, and I look forward to hearing more
I had exactly the same problem (engine not starting when pointed downhill) with my 1979 olds Delta 88, my 1981 Old Delta 88, and my 1982 Olds Cutlass. I don't remember any problems with my 1981 GMC pickup diesel. I loved the fuel mileage and I loved the sound of awesome power inside the cabin. They didn't have awesom power, but they sounded like they did. Outside, the cars sounded like a bucket of bolts, but inside you only heard the low frequency rumble of the V8. I bought them used for very low prices. I wish I could have kept at least one of them for an occasional drive. The sound of the engine was the best of all my 25 cars except my 1964 Corvette fastback. I removed the 327/300HP engine w/Powerglide and installed a 409/409HP V8 with 2 Carter AFB carbs and B&M rebuilt Chevrolet truck 4 speed hydramatic. At low throttle, it ran on only 2 barrels,. But when I floored the gas peddle, opening the other 6 barrels , the engine sounded like it was going to inhale the trees on both sides of the road.
@@dessertfox3263 Thank you for sharing such an awesome story
Those Oldsmobiles and that epic Corvette swap are a real tribute to the golden age of American muscle and ingenuity. It’s amazing how those V8s could create such a symphony inside the cabin while roaring like beasts on the outside. Your 409/409HP setup must have been a dream-true muscle car magic
And you're absolutely right, every engine has its quirks, but that’s part of their charm. To all our fans: what are your favorite muscle car memories? Let’s hear them in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars...
Have a good day.
You missed the worst engine series ever built the Ford Powerstroke 6.0L and 6.4L diesel engines. They are notorious for having to be rebuilt between 35,000 and 50,000 miles. The rebuilds cost $35,000 to $52,000 to fix the design flaws and make them reliable. My friend got burned by both engines in his F450 trucks.
These engines were plagued by design flaws like head gasket failures, oil cooler issues, and EGR problems. Ford tried to address them, but many owners ended up "bulletproofing" their engines, which involved costly upgrades like ARP head studs, upgraded oil coolers, and aftermarket EGR deletes. The 6.0L, in particular, became infamous for its reliability issues, leaving truck owners frustrated. The 6.4L, while offering better power, didn’t fare much better due to fuel system failures and excessive soot buildup.
That said, these engines have become a cautionary tale in diesel truck history. Thanks for bringing this up-it’s always great to discuss these stories. Let us know what other engines or vehicles you’d like us to cover.
Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video.
Have a good day.
I definitely do not disagree with you, but I have to say that I was very fortunate with a 2004 Super Duty 6.0 that I owned. I had ~174,000 miles on it when I sold it, and NEVER had a single problem with it. It hauled heavy payloads on a dedicated route, and it was virtually all highway miles. I sold it out of fear of what “could” be lurking around the corner.
@mistered9435 Wow, it's great to hear a success story about the 6.0 Powerstroke
You're one of the lucky few who had a trouble-free experience with this engine, especially hauling heavy payloads on highway routes. Many owners weren't so fortunate, dealing with head gasket failures, EGR issues, and oil cooler breakdowns. Ford tried to address these problems, but “bulletproofing” became the go-to solution-adding ARP head studs, upgraded oil coolers, and EGR deletes to make these trucks reliable workhorses.
Your story proves that with proper maintenance and highway driving, the 6.0 could still deliver solid performance. It’s always awesome to hear real-world experiences like yours. Let us know if there are other engines or trucks you'd like us to dive into.
Thanks for sharing your story! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the next video. Keep those muscle car memories alive-have a fantastic day...
I had a Ranger with the 3.8 v6. I drove it for 40k with bad head gaskets. I just kept adding coolant and waiting for the oil to turn into a coffee milkshake. The thing overheated as part of normal operation.
@steveo7006 Thanks for sharing your Ranger experience
Dealing with bad head gaskets and overheating must have been really challenging. It highlights the importance of regular maintenance and addressing engine issues promptly to keep your vehicle running smoothly. For all our muscle car enthusiasts, ensuring your engine’s health is crucial for that powerful performance we love. We’d love to hear more about your experiences and any tips you might have for others facing similar issues.
Don’t forget to comment below, share your stories, and subscribe to our channel for more awesome content on American Muscle Cars.
Let’s keep the passion roaring
2.2L gm engine was NOT bad. Had one in a Cavalier, and at one point went over 100k mile w/o an oil change (was "poor" at the time. Kept it topped off, that was all. It ran over 250k miles, and when traded in, bought a Cobat. Almost wish I still had the Cavalier.
Thanks for sharing your awesome experience, @abn82dmp
It’s impressive how your 2.2L GM engine in the Cavalier lasted over 250k miles with just topping off the oil. Your story highlights the durability and potential of these engines when properly maintained. Transitioning to a Cobra must have been thrilling! We’d love to hear more from our community about their muscle car journeys.
Don’t forget to comment below with your stories, share this video with fellow enthusiasts, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more great content.
Let’s keep the muscle car passion roaring
While the 2.2L wasn’t a powerhouse, it had legendary durability for an economy engine. It's not a muscle car engine, but Chevy showed they could build tough even in small packages.
I had two cars with the GM 3.8L V6. Both lasted many more than 100k and I felt the engines had plenty of power, did not use oil nor overheat.
@jameshanes7982 Thanks for sharing your experience with the GM 3.8L V6
It’s always great to hear real-life stories about the longevity and reliability of these iconic engines. The 3.8L V6 is truly a workhorse in GM’s lineup, known for its durability and solid performance. Many muscle car enthusiasts have fond memories of these engines powering everything from daily drivers to performance builds. It’s no wonder they’ve left such a lasting impression!
For those who may not know, the 3.8L V6 was not only reliable but also versatile, powering models like the Buick Grand National-an absolute beast in its time.
have a great day...
@ It would have been a good motor for a mid-engined, consumer sports car.
The Cadillac HT-4100 is much more deserving of a place on this list than the V-4-6-8. With the 4-6-8, all you had to do was deactivate the cylinder deactivation and you had one of the toughest engines ever made; I've even read that just deactivating the inherently rough 6 cylinder mode, letting it switch between 4 and 8 cylinders, was enough to make it smooth and adequately reliable. But there was no easy way to fix the 4100; what can you do with an engine that won't stay in one piece?
the Cadillac HT-4100 earned its reputation for being one of the most troublesome engines of its time. The aluminum block paired with cast-iron heads led to coolant leaks and major reliability headaches. With underwhelming performance and a design that just couldn’t keep up, it was a real letdown for Cadillac fans.
On the flip side, the V8-6-4, when cylinder deactivation was bypassed or fine-tuned, proved to be a solid performer. As you mentioned, even leaving just the 4- and 8-cylinder modes intact made a night-and-day difference. It showed that Cadillac had the right idea, but the tech of the time just wasn’t ready.
Keep those great comments coming, everyone! We love diving into these topics with you. Don’t forget to share, subscribe, and join the ride with American Muscle Cars. Have an awesome day, and see you in the next video...
I wanted to love the Buick 3800’s, but I’ve both witnessed and experienced catastrophic failures with them, even though they had all been meticulously maintained and never saw much abuse.
Hey there, thanks for sharing your experience with the Buick 3800! It’s tough to hear about catastrophic failures, especially when you’ve taken great care of the engine. The 3800 has a bit of a love-hate reputation in the car community. On one hand, it was praised for its efficiency and power when introduced, even landing a spot on Ward's 10 Best Engines list. On the other, issues like intake manifold gaskets and the occasional random failures have left some owners scratching their heads.
That said, plenty of enthusiasts still swear by its durability when properly maintained-and we’d love to hear more stories from others. Maybe some tips or fixes could help someone out there
Everyone, if you’ve got a Buick 3800 tale or know a trick to keep these engines running strong, drop a comment below. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more muscle car memories. Hope to see you in the next video, and have a great day...
GM is the king of this list!
Respectfully disagree, while GM had its share of flops, let’s not forget Ford and Mopar had their missteps too like Ford's 410 FE or Mopar's 413 'Golden Lion'...
I've heard only good things about the GM 3800 V6, especially it's incredibly good fuel economy. I've heard that up to 30 mpg could be achieved on the highway. As for the Ford 3.8 Essex V6, I had the 4.2 version in my F150 and it had nearly 190K on it when I traded it in. It was still running good.
Thanks so much for sharing your experience
You're absolutely right about the GM 3800 V6, it's known for its amazing fuel efficiency, often reaching up to 30 mpg on the highway, making it a great option for long trips. The Ford 3.8 Essex V6 also has a solid reputation, and it's impressive that your F150 ran strong even at nearly 190K miles! These engines really show how durability and efficiency can go hand in hand. We'd love to hear more from everyone, so drop your thoughts in the comments, share your experiences, and don't forget to subscribe for more American muscle car insights
Have a great day...
Interesting take, but I gotta say, the GM 3800 V6 gets too much hype for being ‘bulletproof.’ Sure, 30 mpg sounds nice, but it lacked the raw power muscle car fans crave. The Ford Essex 3.8? Solid, but no performance champ either especially compared to old-school V8s. My 4.2 felt underpowered hauling loads in my F150. Honestly, they’re great commuters, but for muscle? Gimme a small-block V8 any day
@@KeithGreene-k1v The GM 3800 V6 truly stands out for its incredible highway fuel economy, often reaching up to 30 mpg. And the Ford 3.8 Essex V6, especially with nearly 190K miles on your F150, is a testament to its durability. Of course, no engine is perfect, some might face issues others haven't experienced yet. That’s why we’d love to hear from all our fans! What’s been your experience with these engines or others? Share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for the best in American Muscle Car content
@@MuscleCarMasters68 The GM 3800 V6 is overhyped. 30 mpg is great, but muscle cars are about power, not MPG. And the Ford Essex 3.8? Durable, sure, but falls flat in performance especially compared to a roaring small block V8. My F150’s 4.2 struggled with loads. For true muscle, there’s no replacement for displacement.
@@KeithGreene-k1v The GM 3800 V6 truly stands out for its incredible highway fuel economy, often reaching up to 30 mpg. And the Ford 3.8 Essex V6, especially with nearly 190K miles on your F150, is a testament to its durability. Of course, no engine is perfect, some might face issues others haven't experienced yet. That’s why we’d love to hear from all our fans
What’s been your experience with these engines or others? Share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for the best in American Muscle Car content...Have a great day.
Calling BS on 1.9 Saturn. Had one with over 500k
Absolutely, it's incredible what some engines can accomplish with the right maintenance and a bit of luck! The Saturn 1.9L engines, especially the SOHC versions, really have built a reputation for endurance. With regular oil changes, careful maintenance, and even a few part replacements along the way, many of these engines have gone the distance and then some. It's no wonder some hit the 500k mark!
Thanks for sharing your experience-keeping these legends alive is what we're all about! To everyone watching, drop your own mileage stories in the comments, share this with fellow enthusiasts, and don’t forget to subscribe for more insights and stories on American Muscle Cars....
Look, I know folks love to slam the 1.9 Saturn, but I'm calling BS on it being unreliable. Mine clocked over 500k miles, and it still ran like a champ. Sure, it might not have the muscle of a classic V8, but for what it was, that engine could go the distance. I get it; it’s not a fire-breathing V8, but sometimes, a car that just keeps going can be more impressive than a finicky powerhouse. Not every engine needs to be a gas-guzzling beast to be respected.
@CookeZachery Absolutely. It's amazing to hear stories like yours-engines that prove their worth not just in raw power but in sheer durability. The Saturn 1.9L, especially in the SOHC form, definitely earned its stripes as a high-mileage workhorse. These engines had some unique design traits that contributed to their longevity, like lightweight aluminum blocks and straightforward engineering that made them easier to maintain. And let’s not forget, it was one of those engines that didn’t need to be flashy to earn respect-it just kept going!
And you're right, not every legendary engine needs to be a roaring V8. Sometimes, it's those engines that just keep ticking mile after mile, year after year, that leave a lasting impression. Stories like yours show that there's more to the car world than raw horsepower; reliability and durability deserve their own spotlight too.
To everyone else here, what’s your high-mileage hero? Drop your stories in the comments, hit that share button with a fellow car lover, and make sure to subscribe for more incredible tales from the world of American Muscle Cars.
This clip bait video!
@@MuscleCarMasters68then don't call them out for views!!! Get a real job!
Massive difference between the first gen 3.8 that was in cars in the 80s versus The Late Model 3800 the only thing they really have in common is the displacement. And despite some of the development problems The Late Model 3800 has a more solid durable architecture than the old school 3.8 because of the offset cylinder Banks which take full advantage of the bearing clearance and the optimal positioning for the rods and mains where is the more uniform cylinder Bank design of the old school 3.8 proved to be downfall for the design and problematic in anything that was not also invested with a Turbocharger, those engines got all of the durability goodies along with the go fast goodies but the regular naturally aspirated 3.8 got the short end of the stick.
You're spot on about the massive difference between the first-gen 3.8 and the late-model 3800. The first-gen had its charm but lacked the robustness we see in the 3800's offset cylinder bank design. That offset layout wasn’t just about clever engineering it gave the rods and mains optimal positioning, ensuring greater durability and smoother operation.
The early naturally aspirated 3.8s often fell short, missing out on the durability upgrades reserved for their turbocharged counterparts, which had beefier internals to handle the boost. The late-model 3800 fixed those issues, becoming a reliable powerhouse, especially when paired with supercharging. It's why the 3800 Series II and III are fan favorites today, known for solid performance and longevity.
What’s your favorite engine generation and why?
Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic content. Hope to see you in the next video, have a great day
The Caddy engine was good. It was the control electronics which were screwed.😯
Thank you for sharing your thoughts Cadillac engines of that era had solid potential, but the electronics often let them down. Systems like the V8-6-4 cylinder deactivation were ahead of their time but lacked the refinement we expect today, leading to many reliability complaints. It’s a classic case of great engineering hindered by underdeveloped control technology.
That said, opinions on this engine are divisive. Some fans believe it’s one of the most innovative concepts Cadillac ever attempted, while others view it as a total misstep. What do you all think? Was this engine truly a failure, or just a victim of early electronic limitations? Let’s hear your experiences and opinions in the comments!
Keep sharing, commenting, and subscribing to Muscle Car Masters-your voice fuels this community.
Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day.
YEP! I hot-rodded a '70 8.2l (500ci) Cadillac v8 and put it in a '74 3/4 ton GMC 4x4 (K2500). Runing approx. 450hp / 560 ft-lb torque. Was a beast, couldn't keep a trans behind it. Truck had a TH350, and had to rebuild it multiple times. Finally got a race shop to do a good rebuild, then sheared the transfer case bolts off. Great engine, could easily turn 38" Monster-Mudder tires into smoke in about 1/2 sec., plus with all the torque, 12-16mpg was typical (not bad for 4bbl Holley Carb.)
@@abn82dmp Wow, what an incredible build! That '70 8.2L Cadillac V8 in a '74 K2500 sounds like an absolute monster. 450hp and 560 ft-lb of torque is no joke! It's a testament to how much raw power those engines had, especially when paired with some creative hot-rodding. The story of blowing through TH350 transmissions and even shearing transfer case bolts speaks volumes about the sheer force behind it. And 12-16 mpg? Impressive for a Holley-fed beast like that
We’d love to hear more stories like this-share your builds, experiences, and thoughts below. Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars....hope to see you next time.
I had to stop when they said the 3.8/3800 was a bad engine. The engine makes decent power in naturally aspirated form and better power in its forced induction form. 2 issues with the engine which are easily fixed and these engines are known to go 350-500,000 miles.
Hey @therealR.D., thanks so much for your comment and for sharing your thoughts
the 3.8/3800 engine is often underrated. In its naturally aspirated form, it does make respectable power, and when you add a forced induction system, it really wakes up, showing just how capable that engine is. The reliability of these engines is another key point-when well-maintained, they really can go the distance, often hitting impressive mileage numbers like you mentioned, from 350,000 to 500,000 miles. It's all about keeping them in good shape, especially when addressing the known issues, which are relatively easy to fix, as you pointed out.
We appreciate your input, and it’s great to see fellow muscle car fans who understand these engines' true potential!
To everyone else, don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to stay up-to-date on all things American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the newest videos-have a nice weekend
So many of these enignes are on this list because people don't care of their cars, not because they were bad engines.
Thanks so much for sharing your perspective
You bring up a really important point about how the reputation of certain engines often reflects how they’re maintained rather than the quality of their design. In the world of American muscle, proper upkeep can make all the difference. When enthusiasts truly invest time, care, and attention into their rides-performing regular tune-ups, using quality parts, and ensuring proper storage engines that might be labeled “problematic” can actually deliver fantastic performance and longevity.
Your comment reminds us that it’s not only about the engineering that went into these legendary powerplants, but also the dedication and passion that owners bring to the table. Every American muscle car has a story that’s shaped by the hands and hearts of those who maintain it. We’d love to hear more thoughts and experiences from you and other viewers, so be sure to comment, share your stories, and subscribe for more great American Muscle Cars content...
As much as I love (loved?) the Mazda Wankel Rotary Engine, the pre-1974 versions were REALLY bad. As in, it's going to give you lots of trouble before dying at 30,000-40,000 miles bad. By the time they got to the 1976-77 models, they were quite good if you maintained them properly. This helped the 1979-1985 RX-7 become the huge success that it was.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the Mazda Wankel Rotary Engine
You’re absolutely right-those early pre-1974 models were plagued with reliability issues, mainly due to apex seal failures and oil consumption. But Mazda didn’t give up. By the mid-70s, they had ironed out the problems, making the rotary far more durable. The RX-7 you mentioned? It was a game-changer. Its lightweight chassis and high-revving rotary engine made it a hit, capturing the spirit of pure performance.
As muscle car fans, we can appreciate how innovation, even with its bumps, shapes automotive history. From the rumble of a V8 to the scream of a rotary, it’s all about passion for the road.
What’s your favorite muscle car-engine combo? Let us know in the comments
Don’t forget to share, subscribe, and keep the American Muscle Cars spirit alive. Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day
@@MuscleCarMasters68 I'm more of a sports car/sports sedan/rally car guy than a muscle car guy.
I love admitting though that Dodge's Hellcat Chargers and Challengers had me giddy almost every time I thought about how outrageous they were! 707 NET, emissions legal horsepower with a factory warranty for "only" $80,000? That was almost impossible to believe! Big, silly, unbelievably fast cars made by an American manufacturer. Iconic and legendary the moment they came out.
Tesla got my attention when they started making AWDs and they were fast to boot. Now many of their faster accelerating models are changing minds about what constitutes a fast car/SUV.
Thanks for sharing your love for cars
The Hellcat lineup is a wild mix of raw power and American engineering-707 horsepower with a warranty is truly mind-blowing. Dodge brought the muscle car back into legendary status with these beasts. Tesla, though, has flipped the script with insane acceleration in electric form, proving speed comes in many shapes. Muscle cars, sports cars, or rally legends-it’s all about that thrill on the road...
What’s your dream car-engine combo? Let us know in the comments.
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars! Hope to see you next videos. Stay inspired and have an amazing day
The 3800 series 1,2, supercharged and NA, rank GM's #1 engine ever made, and is in the top 10 best engines EVER MADE.
The GM 3800 is a legend
From the Series I to the supercharged Series II, it’s a testament to engineering done right durable, powerful, and endlessly adaptable. It powered everything from sedans to sports cars and earned its spot among the all-time greats. Whether naturally aspirated or boosted, this V6 proved GM could deliver reliability and performance in one package. What do YOU think? Does the 3800 deserve the #1 spot? Share your thoughts below, and let’s keep this muscle car conversation roaring
Don’t forget to like, comment, share, and subscribe for more engine history and horsepower
Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day...
The 80’s 350 V8 converted to diesel was total junk. I rode in one a friend of mine had bought for $1,000 and it was only a few months old. His boss had bought and hated it and sold it for a big loss. It was probably the slowest car I ever rode in. You could walk across the road faster than it. He pulled the engine and converted it back to gasoline and it was then a nice driving car.
@Dld1985 Thanks for sharing that story what a wild experience
The 1980s diesel-converted 350 V8 is often remembered as a misstep in automotive history, but it's great to hear that your friend's conversion back to gasoline brought new life to the car. It's a testament to the resilience and adaptability of classic American muscle! Keep the stories coming, your insights make this channel even better.
For everyone watching, what’s your take on the most failed engine or car setup in history? Drop a comment, share your stories, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more classic car tales and insights!
I didn't own one but remember the Cadillac 8-6-4 as problematic and wonder how it ever made it to production. I bought a new 1984 Chevy Silverado with a 5.0 V8 and it was ok at first but later it was problematic.
Thanks for sharing your memories! The Cadillac 8-6-4 was certainly a bold move, aiming for fuel efficiency by deactivating cylinders-a concept ahead of its time. Unfortunately, the technology wasn't quite there, leading to reliability issues. GM’s ECM struggled to manage the transitions smoothly, frustrating many owners. However, it laid the groundwork for modern cylinder deactivation systems we see today.
As for your '84 Chevy Silverado with the 5.0 V8, those engines were known for their dependability when well-maintained, but carburetor issues and emissions control systems often caused headaches. Many owners found upgrading to a better carb or tweaking the timing made a world of difference.
It’s always fascinating to hear these stories-our passion for these classic rides keeps them alive! What’s your favorite memory from that Silverado? Let us know below, and don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars! Hope to see you in the next video. Have a good day....
As a mechanic back in the 80s the Caddy 8 6 4 was not a bad engine. When it changed cylinders the car seemed to missfire. A simple fix was to cut the control wire at the ECM to eliminate the change over.
Yeah that makes a ton of sense.
WHEN I WAS LIVING IN PHOENIX, AZ. I OWNED A '97 CHEVY CAMARO WITH THE 3800 V-6 AND I HAD NO PROBLEMS WITH IT. I PURCHASED IT IN GLENDALE, AZ. RIGHT OFF THE LOT. I SOLD IT ABOUT FIVE YEARS LATER.
Cadillac 390 circa 1963 was an awful motor. Oil pumps in the front cover, oil pickup tube was almost feet long, Dealerships told customers to not change their oil. I built 3 of these for my best buddy and they never last long, the cast iron blicks are horrible and were never bored well. Just junk
Thank you so much for sharing your experience and thoughts on the Cadillac 390
It’s fascinating to hear firsthand insights, especially from someone who’s worked on these engines. While the 390 is often remembered as a key part of Cadillac’s luxury performance in the early ‘60s, it certainly had its share of challenges. The long oil pickup tube and front-mounted oil pump were definitely design quirks, and lack of proper maintenance compounded reliability issues. Cadillac prioritized smooth power delivery over durability back then, which might explain some of the machining inconsistencies you mentioned.
Your story highlights how important maintenance and design quality are for classic engines! For everyone else, what’s been your experience with Cadillac motors? Drop a comment below, share your stories, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more discussions about the highs-and lows-of classic engines.
Let’s keep this conversation rolling
I couldn’t disagree more
That Cadillac 390 was a powerhouse for its time smooth, torquey, and reliable if maintained right. Sure, the oil system wasn’t perfect, but most issues were from neglect or cheap oil. I’ve rebuilt a couple, and they’re bulletproof if done properly. Cast iron blocks were solid, and boring issues? Probably a bad shop.....
The 3.0 mistubishi motor was the single overhead cam motor. The dohc motor didn't have any issues
The 3.0 Mitsubishi motor. The single overhead cam (SOHC) version of the 3.0L V6 was known for its simplicity and reliability, while the dual overhead cam (DOHC) version was a bit more complex, but definitely held up well with fewer known issues. The SOHC motor was also widely used in cars like the Dodge Caravan and Chrysler LeBaron, gaining a reputation for durability over the years.
If anyone has memories of driving these cars or has a different take, we’d love to hear it! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to keep these great discussions going on American Muscle Cars!
Everyone's always quick to call out the DOHC 3.0 Mitsubishi motor as some 'engineering marvel,' but let's be real here-single overhead cam was the way to go! Fewer headaches, fewer moving parts, and honestly, it held up better than the DOHC model ever could. In my experience, the DOHC was the one that needed constant tweaking just to keep running smooth. The SOHC? Rock solid by comparison.
@CookeZachery You're absolutely right about the SOHC version of the 3.0 Mitsubishi V6. It’s a classic case of “less is more”-with fewer moving parts, the SOHC setup offered easier maintenance, fewer timing issues, and overall reliability that owners could count on. This engine also became popular because of its smooth, dependable performance in models like the Dodge Dynasty and Plymouth Acclaim, where it proved to be a long-haul motor for families and commuters alike.
On the other hand, the DOHC version, while it brought more power and performance potential, did require more tuning and was prone to issues if not meticulously maintained. Some even argued that it felt a bit over-engineered for its time, especially compared to the rock-solid simplicity of the SOHC. For many enthusiasts, the SOHC 3.0 ended up being the reliable workhorse while the DOHC became more of a high-maintenance choice.
If anyone else has memories with these engines-whether you were dealing with the DOHC’s quirks or enjoying the SOHC’s no-fuss dependability-share your story with us in the comments! And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Every story helps us keep these conversations rolling and the history alive...
As mechanic back in the 90s I cant to begin to tell you how many valve guides and oil seals I replaced on those things.
@@DayTwo-w8n As someone who worked on these engines back in the day, I never understood the hype around the DOHC 3.0 Mitsubishi. Sure, it looks great on paper, but in practice? Constantly chasing oil leaks, valve guide issues, and worn seals was a regular occurrence. Meanwhile, the SOHC version quietly got the job done with fewer complications. Less moving parts meant fewer chances for something to go wrong-simple as that. The DOHC crowd can keep bragging about "higher revs," but what's the point if you're spending all that time under the hood? Give me a reliable SOHC any day of the week.
ya, i had a '03 gmc sonoma with that dam 2.2l, in my 47 years of driving many cars and trucks, IT WAS THE SLOWEST, MOST GUTLESS vehicle i have EVER driven. i have 2.7 tacoma, was ok, 2.3l ranger, was ok. but it couldn't move out of its own way, with n empty truck, turn on the AC or put ANY load and you needed to deploy the sails to help push you along.. heh maybe in some econobox small car it might have worked, but NOT A TRUCK. it never shoulda been even considered for trucks.
the 2.2L in the '03 Sonoma was an engine that left a lot of drivers underwhelmed, especially when paired with a truck. While it might have been acceptable in a lightweight econobox, expecting it to handle the demands of a truck, especially with the AC running or carrying a load, was asking too much. For comparison, engines like the 2.3L Ranger or the 2.7L Tacoma provided at least adequate performance for their class, but the 2.2L struggled to deliver torque where it mattered most. It’s a classic case of manufacturers trying to balance fuel economy and costs without considering real-world truck use.
We’d love to hear from others-did you ever own a truck with an underwhelming engine? Drop a comment, share your story, and don't forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engine talk. Have a great weekend, and see you in the next video...
I suspect that there might be a worse one; a carbureted 2.8l v6 in a 1984 S-10 blazer! I had one, and if I was driving into a headwind, it could not maintain 55mph at wide open throttle!
@@mistered9435 You're absolutely right-those carbureted 2.8L V6s in the early S-10 Blazers were infamous for leaving drivers frustrated. Wide open throttle just to hit 55 mph? That’s rough! It reminds me of the 2.2L in the '03 Sonoma-another engine that seemed better suited for a compact car than a truck. It’s amazing how engines like the 2.3L Ranger or 2.7L Tacoma could at least keep up, while some GM small blocks left drivers shaking their heads.
What about you, gearheads?
Have an awesome day-see you in the next video
Most of these issues were results of government intervention in the form of the EPA . Chrysler had economic versions as well as performance engines in V-8 and 6 cylinder that performed well . As did Ford with 4-6. & v8 . Several that were bullet proof .
GM as well .
Thanks for your thoughtful comment, @ramie-uz9xi
You’re absolutely right about the impact of government regulations like the EPA on the muscle car industry. While these regulations forced automakers to adapt, they also pushed them to innovate in some interesting ways. Chrysler’s performance V8 and six-cylinder engines, along with Ford’s 4-, 6-, and V8 options, were legendary for their reliability and raw power. The bulletproof engines you're talking about, like the Ford FE and Chrysler's 440, are definitely iconic in the muscle car world.
GM also had their share of powerhouse engines, and it's fascinating to see how all three brands adapted to the changing market while still delivering those legendary performance figures. It’s a testament to their engineering and determination.
For everyone watching, drop your thoughts in the comments! Share your favorite muscle car engines or any other insights you have. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more deep dives into these classics.
Hope to see you in the newest videos... have a nice weekend
You might want to think about creating a dedicated list just for GM's failed engines. From the 3.1L V6 to the Oldsmobile Diesel and even the 2.4L Quad 4, there’s a whole lineup of GM engines that could fill an entire video series on their own.
GM's lineup of 'challenging' engines could easily fill an entire video series. Starting with the 3.1L V6, known for head gasket issues, to the Oldsmobile Diesel, which, while innovative, fell short with reliability concerns and a lack of durability - GM certainly had its share of experimental designs. And then there's the 2.4L Quad 4! Originally intended as a high-output, efficient engine, it faced problems like head gasket leaks and timing chain issues, making it memorable for all the wrong reasons.
The potential for a full series on these engines is huge. We'd love to dive into the stories behind each of these powerplants, from the engineers' visions to the real-world outcomes. Everyone, let us know in the comments if you'd like to see that series! Be sure to share this video and subscribe to American Muscle Cars - we’ve got more in-depth content on GM's history and much more coming your way!
@@MuscleCarMasters68 you could just make a series about GM using a worse engine than there was in the GM family for "reasons". particularly in the 4 cyls of 80s. particularly the fiero.
@@lasskinn474 GM's history of sometimes ‘puzzling’ engine choices in the '80s is prime material for a series! The Fiero's 2.5L "Iron Duke" engine is a perfect example: initially meant to balance economy and durability, it didn’t quite meet expectations, especially with some high-profile failures and recalls due to oil leaks and connecting rod issues. And when it came to high-performance potential? Well, the Iron Duke left enthusiasts wanting a lot more.
And let's not forget the 2.8L V6, which, although better suited to the Fiero's ambitions, still wasn’t without quirks, from cooling issues to intake manifold problems. GM had higher-output engines in their arsenal, but cost and design constraints meant they often stuck to engines that weren't quite up to the demands of spirited driving.
We’re excited about diving into this series - tracing how each decision played out for GM and for the fans who loved (or put up with!) these engines. So, let us know what you think in the comments, share this video with fellow fans, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. We’re ready to take a deep dive into these engines and bring you more on GM's legacy, both the highs and the lows....
@@lasskinn474 I get where you're coming from, but I’d argue that not all of GM’s 4-cylinder engines of the ’80s were worse choices. For instance, the Fiero’s original engine may have had its limitations, but the 2.5L ‘Iron Duke’ was actually chosen for its reliability and fuel efficiency, which were key priorities during the fuel-conscious 1980s. It may not have been a performance powerhouse, but it fit the needs of the time. Plus, GM did make strides in other engine areas later on, like with the Quad 4. There's definitely a list of misses, but it's not all one-sided....
@@CookeZachery the european gm wing for latter half of 80s had cheaper, lighter engines that did same power with much less displacement as the duke while being more fuel efficient though.
like 90hp is 1.6l region, not 2.5. GM had cheap efficient 4 cyl designs all along within the company.
at the latter end if they had done a fiero2 just with the driving gear from the turbo 4wd calibra that could've been really something.
the refusal to use the european gm designs that went into cheaper cars and were more efficient would make for a decent video. not just 4 cyls, 1990 opel/vauxhall had a saloon with a turbo inline six that had higher top speed than the zr1 1990 - that also used less fuel.
Great list, but I was definitely expecting to see the Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines make an appearance! Both of these had their fair share of infamous issues, from the 4100's oil leaks and underwhelming power to the Northstar's notorious head gasket failures and high maintenance costs.
The Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines both brought their own unique challenges to the table. The 4100, introduced in the early '80s, was Cadillac’s attempt to downsize and improve fuel efficiency, but it faced issues like low horsepower and oil leaks that hurt its reputation. Cadillac intended it to be economical, but many enthusiasts found it lacked the performance expected from the Cadillac name.
The Northstar, on the other hand, was Cadillac’s high-tech flagship engine in the '90s. Known for its power and smoothness, it unfortunately became infamous for head gasket issues, high repair costs, and a complex design that could be challenging to maintain. The Northstar had potential and offered a solid driving experience-when it was running well-but the long-term reliability concerns overshadowed its performance for many owners.
If you’ve got more to add or have experience with these engines, we’d love to hear about it! Drop your thoughts in the comments, and if you’re enjoying the deep dives into American muscle history, make sure to comment, share, and subscribe for more content on both the iconic and controversial engines that shaped the industry....
@@MuscleCarMasters68 The 4100, introduced during a time when Cadillac was under pressure to meet new fuel efficiency standards, indeed struggled with reliability. Its aluminum block, combined with cast-iron heads, often led to overheating and coolant issues that frustrated owners. Plus, its low output of around 125 horsepower really did fall short of the powerhouse reputation Cadillac had built over decades. Unfortunately, despite Cadillac's effort to embrace fuel economy, the 4100’s reputation stuck as one of the brand’s weaker engines.
totally agree.... The Cadillac 4100 and Northstar absolutely deserve a spot on this list for their unique character! Sure, some fans love to bash on these engines for their issues, but let's be real - they brought something different to the muscle car world! The 4100 may not have been the strongest, but its quirks make it memorable. And the Northstar? Head gaskets aside, it showed Cadillac was still trying to push the envelope with advanced tech, even if it came with a few challenges. These engines definitely deserve some recognition
Absolutely, you nailed it! The Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines were bold moves for their time, and they both deserve more credit than they get. The HT4100 may have been modest on power, but it marked a period where Cadillac was experimenting with weight-saving aluminum and fuel efficiency, which was a huge pivot from the land yacht era. This engine paved the way for Cadillac to rethink what a luxury performance engine could be, quirks and all!
And as for the Northstar, Cadillac really went for innovation. Variable valve timing, all-aluminum construction, and the Northstar's high-revving nature were ahead of their time, especially in the luxury market. Despite the well-known head gasket issues, the Northstar was a powerhouse for Cadillac’s return to performance - and let’s face it, it set the stage for a whole new era of Cadillac performance vehicles.
Let’s hear what you all think! Share your stories, opinions, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars so we can keep this conversation going and give these engines the recognition they deserve!
I'd been told the HT-4100 V8 had fuel injection problems
The iron duke in the fiero also suffered from a reduced oil capacity because of a shallow oil pan to get the car lower.
You're absolutely right
The Iron Duke in the Fiero did have a reduced oil capacity due to its shallow oil pan, all in the name of lowering the car's stance. Unfortunately, that design compromise contributed to engine durability issues, especially under spirited driving conditions. It's a reminder of how engineering trade-offs can impact performance and reliability. For those who love the Fiero or the Iron Duke, share your experiences and tips in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more fascinating insights.
Wishing everyone a great day, see you in the next video
As does the Audi 1.8t
@@timdodd3897 Yes, the Audi 1.8T shares some of the same challenges when it comes to engine design compromises. Just like the Iron Duke in the Fiero, the 1.8T's performance can be influenced by factors like oil capacity and cooling, which affect durability, especially when pushed hard. It's a perfect example of how every engine has its strengths and weaknesses. For those of you who love these engines, drop your thoughts and experiences in the comments we’d love to hear your stories! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more muscle car passion and insights.
Keep the engine roaring...
I have known the 122/2200 engine to be very reliable. I own a 98 s10 with 560,000 on the original/untouched 2200 engine. They definitely lack in power. The head gaskets are something I have encountered in engines from the early to mid 90s and rarely in later models.
Wow, 560,000 miles on an untouched 2200 engine-that’s absolutely incredible and a true testament to its reliability
You’re right about the power, though; these engines weren’t built for speed but for durability. The head gasket issues you mentioned were more common in the earlier versions, and GM seemed to improve the design in the later models, making them tougher over time. Your S10 proves just how solid these engines can be with proper care.
Let’s hear from everyone-share your high-mileage stories, hit that like button, and don’t forget to subscribe for more! Hope to see you in the next video.
Have a fantastic day
@@MuscleCarMasters68my parents both owned cavaliers (80s/early 90s) that went over 300,000. Unfortunately for my s10, everything else around the engine is going to pot. Interior plastics cracking and breaking, electrical problems and rust on the body and frame. I haven’t given up yet, but the decision on whether to get it past another inspection is happening right now.
@@BucktailFishing Wow, 560,000 miles on an untouched 2200 engine-now that’s what we call bulletproof reliability! GM may not have built these engines for raw power, but they sure knew how to keep them ticking. It’s a shame about the S10’s other issues; unfortunately, rust and brittle interior plastics were common battles for trucks of that era. Still, the fact that you’re considering keeping it alive shows your dedication-it’s a true labor of love for any enthusiast.
For those watching, let’s hear your stories! Have you pushed your car or truck past 300,000 miles? Drop your high-mileage victories in the comments below.
No mention of the Northstar? And what about Cummins' infamous killer dowel pin or the Vulcan V6? Seems like a missed chance to cover some of the biggest headaches out there! Those engines brought plenty of challenges, from costly repairs to full-on engine rebuilds.
The Northstar, Cummins’ killer dowel pin (KDP), and the Vulcan V6 all have their own unique stories of challenges and costly repairs. The Northstar engine, for example, was groundbreaking in design with its DOHC and aluminum construction but became infamous for head gasket failures and the challenging, labor-intensive repair process. It’s a real love-hate relationship for those who’ve had one!
And that killer dowel pin on the Cummins engines - what a nightmare! If that pin came loose, it could cause catastrophic damage by falling into the timing gears, potentially leading to full engine failure. Luckily, a KDP fix kit became available and has saved many engines since.
The Vulcan V6 may not have gained as much fame, but its own issues with oil leaks and cooling system flaws left many owners facing big bills over time. It’s amazing to see how these engines, while still beloved, brought their fair share of headaches.
Thanks for pointing these out! Everyone, feel free to share more engine stories and experiences - we’d love to hear from you. And if you’re enjoying these deep dives, make sure to comment, share, and subscribe to keep the American Muscle Car discussions rolling...
The Vulcan was gutless, but it was usually the trans that gave out before the motor.
@@DeannaLobes This engine, though not known for powerhouse performance, was designed with simplicity and durability in mind, which kept it chugging along for hundreds of thousands of miles. It’s true that while the engine itself was practically bulletproof, the transmissions paired with it often couldn’t keep up - particularly the AX4S and AX4N automatic transmissions, which had a reputation for early failures due to heat buildup and insufficient fluid flow. Ford even released a few upgrades over the years, but some Vulcan owners still remember the dreaded “trans light” warning flash!
What’s fascinating about the Vulcan is that it earned a bit of a cult following because of its reliability in the right conditions. While not exactly a screamer on the track, it had a loyal fanbase in part because it was easy to repair and had a forgiving design for DIY mechanics. And you’re right - like the Northstar and Cummins KDP, the Vulcan V6 has its own tale of quirks and resilience!
Thanks for bringing it up! We’d love to hear more from everyone on their experiences with the Vulcan or any other engine stories. If you’ve had memorable moments - good or bad - with these engines, drop them in the comments! And don’t forget to share, subscribe, and join us as we keep exploring the quirks, stories, and legends of American Muscle Cars.
@@DeannaLobes Totally agree about the missed opportunities here! I can't believe there was no mention of those notorious engines like the Northstar and Vulcan V6 - they both have a history of serious issues that would’ve been worth exploring. And let’s not forget the infamous Cummins killer dowel pin! Ignoring these engines is like sweeping all the big headaches under the rug. These engines aren’t just niche problems; they were nightmares for a lot of people! It would’ve been a solid addition to really dive into the realities of owning these notorious engines.
@@DeannaLobes Honestly, I don't get all the complaints about the Vulcan V6. For a lot of folks, it was a dependable workhorse that just kept going, even if it wasn't a powerhouse. And the transmissions? They weren’t as bad as people make them out to be-probably just a few isolated issues getting blown out of proportion. Same with the Northstar. Yeah, they had their quirks, but plenty of them ran well without any major drama. Cummins' 'killer dowel pin' was overblown too; it’s not like every engine was bound to fall apart. Seems like people focus on a few hiccups and ignore the engines that went the distance without any fuss...
Why is the GM 3800 on this list, I disagree that it was a bad engine. I think it was one of their best ever built. and also the GM 2200 or 2.2 Liter Ecotec is what is currently in my chevy cavalier with 168k on it and nothing ever done to the engine other than coolant flush when I bought it at 70k and regular 5k oil changes. They are known to go 300k in the L-61 variant with proper maintenance, so I don't know how that is a bad engine either. I do agree with the 2.4 Litre Iron duke not being good though. They ate camshafts, or at least that was my experience with them in my 85 cutlass ciera.
Hey, thanks so much for sharing your perspective
We truly appreciate hearing from viewers who have firsthand experience with these engines. You make a great point about the GM 3800 and the 2.2L Ecotec (L61). Many enthusiasts do consider the GM 3800 to be one of the best engines that General Motors produced, known for its durability and smooth torque delivery. Likewise, the 2.2L Ecotec in your Chevy Cavalier has indeed proven its longevity, with many owners reporting well over 200,000 miles on these engines when properly maintained. It’s great to see these stories, as they show that personal care and regular upkeep can make a significant difference.
Every engine design has its strengths and weaknesses, and personal experiences vary. Thanks again for weighing in with your story, it helps enrich our community’s understanding.
Be sure to share your own engine experiences below, hit that subscribe button, and spread the word about American Muscle Cars
But let’s not overlook the Iron Duke’s role in GM history. Sure, it had its flaws, but it powered countless cars through the ’80s. Sometimes, durability isn’t just performance; it’s resilience through tough times...
Your section on the Subaru 2.5 turbo shows a Pontiac Sunfire.
Thank you for your feedback.
The Subaru 2.5 turbo, often found in the WRX and STI, is a legendary engine known for its rally heritage and insane tuning potential, especially when paired with all-wheel drive. As for the Pontiac Sunfire, while it’s not a muscle car, it reminds us how diverse car culture really is-from JDM icons to compact American coupes.
We appreciate sharp-eyed viewers like you keeping us on point-it’s how we grow as a channel. Keep the feedback coming, folks.
had an 89 geo metoir with the suziki 3 cylinder. drove it many times from virginia to kansas. with a little tweeking to the carb and ignition timing, 50 MPG were very doable. only problem was the small car would beat you to death if there was a cross wind, or a lot of big trucks on a two lane.
Seems like a biased list at best. Some don't belong on the list, yet there are several that should be on the list.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it's great to hear from passionate muscle car fans like you.
You're right, 'most failed engines' lists can stir up a lot of debate because everyone has their own experiences and favorites. We aim to shine a light on engines that might not have lived up to their potential or had significant issues, but there's always room for discussion. If you think we missed some or included one that doesn't belong, drop those suggestions in the comments-we’d love to hear your take! That’s what makes the muscle car community so special; it’s all about sharing knowledge and stories.
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars so we can keep bringing you these deep dives into automotive history. Hope to see you in the next video
Have a fantastic day, and keep those wheels turning
What hapoened to the 2.8chevy. couldn't keep rod bearings in thhem.
Ah, the infamous 2.8 Chevy V6-GM's attempt to modernize with a compact engine for smaller cars and trucks in the late '70s and '80s. While it had promise, you’re absolutely right about the rod bearing issue. The early models, especially those before 1985, were notorious for oiling system deficiencies. Low oil pressure and insufficient lubrication at higher RPMs caused premature wear on the bearings. Later versions improved somewhat, especially with the introduction of the 3.1L and 3.4L variants, which built on the same platform but addressed some of those early flaws. Despite its flaws, the 2.8 V6 powered plenty of iconic vehicles, from the Camaro to the S-10 pickups, making it a memorable engine for many enthusiasts.
We’d love to hear what you think share your stories, memories, and experiences! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters! Hope to see you in the next video, and have an awesome day
You forgot the Ford 1.9L 4-cylinder engine found in the 88 1/2 Escort LX
Thanks for catching that, @jimlangley4779
Yes....the Ford 1.9L 4-cylinder engine in the 1988 1/2 Escort LX is a detail we didn’t mention. It's always awesome to hear from fellow enthusiasts who know their stuff! While it’s not a muscle car engine, it’s definitely a key piece of Ford’s history during that era. Your comment adds great value to the discussion-keep those insights coming!
For everyone watching, let’s keep the conversation going! What’s your favorite engine or forgotten gem from American automotive history? Drop your thoughts below, and who knows, it might inspire our next video.
have a good day...hope to see you next comments...
@MuscleCarMasters68 my dad had a 1988 1/2 it snapped two camshaft and eventually Ford just replaced the entire engine which fixed the problem, don't know if it was a different version of the 1.9 but it ran better than it ever did which dad traded it for a Ford F-150 not long after that
@@jimlangley4779 Thanks for sharing that story, @jimlangley4779
It’s amazing how those real-life experiences with Ford engines add so much depth to the conversation. The 1.9L may not be a muscle car powerhouse, but it’s a fascinating part of Ford's evolution, especially during the late ‘80s. Replacing the engine must have been a turning point, and trading up to the iconic F-150? Classic move
hope to see you on newest videos...have a good weekend.
Thank God I missed these clunkers... As a mechanic, you just get a sense for crap
Thanks for sharing your point of view! It’s true that every mechanic develops an instinct for spotting troublesome designs, and some engines or cars definitely earned their reputations as "problematic." That said, these so-called clunkers often have fascinating stories behind their creation, from corporate decisions to innovative features that didn’t quite pan out. Take the Oldsmobile Diesel V8, for example-it had groundbreaking potential but was held back by cost-cutting measures. Or the Vega, which had innovative aluminum engine tech but struggled with reliability and rust issues.
We’d love to hear more from you and others about the cars you’ve worked on and what stood out, good or bad! Let’s keep the conversation rolling. If you enjoy exploring these stories and their impact on automotive history, comment, share your experiences, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters. Let’s keep the passion for muscle cars alive.
The GM 3.1 V6 was overall a very good engine. I knew of several people who put lots of trouble free miles on those.
Thanks for sharing your experience with the GM 3.1 V6
It’s true-many owners had great reliability from this engine, with proper maintenance making all the difference. However, the 3.1 also had a reputation for intake manifold gasket issues, which led to its mixed legacy. That said, it’s always fascinating to hear stories of engines that defied the odds! What do you all think?
Did the GM 3.1 earn its place in history, or does it belong on the "most failed" list?
Let us know in the comments, share your thoughts, and subscribe for more great content! Hope to see you in the next video have a great day
I had a 79 Cutlass Supreme with a 305 4 bbl was great
@jimlangley4779 That 79 Cutlass Supreme with the 305 4-barrel sounds like a true classic
Those late '70s rides had a unique style and presence that still turn heads today. The 305 may not have been the biggest engine, but paired with the right setup, it offered a solid mix of performance and reliability. Thanks for sharing your story, it’s always awesome to hear about the cars that hold a special place in people’s lives! Everyone, drop your favorite muscle car stories in the comments, hit that like button, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead goodness
Keep cruising, have a great day.
Add the GM Ecotec 4 banger found in the 2004 Cavelier LS Sport. I had one that died at 67,000 miles due to a stretched timing chain. It took me a year to pay the $1600 repair cost, only to lose my money when they recalled it a year later for that same problem. This engine is recognizable with its oil filter cartridge housing being cast into the block and easily seen in the left front corner (in car relation position) of the block. Ik is simply a fragile engine, and it is junk.
Thanks for sharing your experience with the GM Ecotec 4-cylinder in the 2004 Cavalier LS Sport. It's unfortunate that you had such a costly and frustrating time with that engine. The Ecotec 4-banger, while a solid performer in many other applications, did have its issues, especially with timing chain problems. This kind of failure is a reminder of how even some well-known engines can fall short in terms of reliability. It's frustrating when a car lets you down like that, especially after putting money into a repair, only to have it recalled for the same issue. The oil filter housing, a unique feature of the Ecotec, definitely made it stand out, but it didn't save it from being a bit too fragile in the long run.
For all the real American muscle fans out there, we love hearing your stories and insights.
Drop your thoughts in the comments, share with your fellow car enthusiasts, and don't forget to subscribe to keep the muscle car passion alive
Let’s keep the love for these legendary machines strong...
The Buick 3800 Series 2 was supposedly a great engine. The early 3800, not so much! I owned some of these knocking oil burning beasts, and even though I belong to Buick Club of America, and am the local Chapter Director, I will say those early 3.8 liter V6 Buicks are all turkeys. A quart every 300 to 400 miles was doing good, and they would knock going uphill. Also, no power to speak of. When the speed limit was 55 mph they barely were good enough to keep up with traffic. Dangerously slow with a 70 mph limit!!
Great comment, @fredanddebramacdonald2445
You bring up a solid point about the early Buick 3.8 V6. While they laid the foundation for the legendary 3800 Series II, those first-generation engines definitely had their struggles-oil consumption, knocks, and that lack of punch were real headaches for owners back in the day. By the time Buick refined things for the 3800 Series II in the '90s, it became one of the most reliable and efficient engines ever produced. Some folks still call it the ‘modern-day straight-six’ for its smoothness and durability.
I’d love to hear what others think-any Buick fans out there with stories about these engines? Drop your thoughts in the comments! And if you haven’t already, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to the channel. There’s plenty more coming your way, and I hope to see you in the newest videos.
Have a nice day
All I know is the key board sound and fake paper crumbling is really annoying!
Thanks for your honest feedback
We’re always looking for ways to improve the viewing experience, and your input helps us fine-tune our content for true muscle car enthusiasts like you. While we aim to create engaging videos, we’ll revisit those effects to ensure they’re not a distraction. Stay tuned for more deep dives into the iconic world of American Muscle Cars. Let us know what you’d like to see next! Your thoughts drive this channel forward. Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to join a growing community of muscle car fans.
Let’s keep the passion alive
Have a good day.
Owned a 2.2 Vortec in a manual C-15 truck from 1998. 100% problemfree 450 000km. It still runs with its original engine. As good as my 54 stovebolt.
Wow, @808bigisland, that's incredible
A 2.2 Vortec with 450,000 km and still going strong proof of solid engineering and great maintenance on your part. And to compare it to a legendary '54 Stovebolt? That’s some high praise! It’s amazing how these engines, though not traditional muscle powerplants, have carved their own legacy of reliability.
To everyone tuning in, what’s the highest mileage or best experience you’ve had with an engine? Drop your stories below, let’s keep the conversation going! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the newest videos... have a nice weekend
Disagree about the Chevy 2.2. Mine used no oil and wasn't that weak. Sold the truck with over 150,000 miles still going strong. Mitsubishi V6 DID have poor valve guides. Haven't heard bad stuff about the 255 Ford V8. It was still a basic Windsor engine so how could Ford goof it up? Ford found a way. Had the Ford 3.8 in 1990 Cougar. Car itself was a PIA>>always fixing something. The engine sprung an antifreeze leak between the front cover and the block that I had to fix. Chevy 305 wasn't that bad. Oil leaks were common with everything. Flat tappet cams of the era (and still today) were poorly heat treated and went flat easily. I disagree about the 3800. It was the BEST engine GM built. The EARLIER 3.8 wasn't good>>weak engine. 2.5 Iron Duke WAS weak from the factory but the basic design could handle some serious power. Quad 4 had a POTENTIALLY good design but quality was poor.
Thank you for sharing such detailed insights and experiences
It’s always great to hear firsthand accounts that challenge or support the points in our videos. The 2.2 and 305 Chevy engines certainly have their defenders, and you’re right-maintenance and luck often play huge roles in engine longevity. As for the 255 Ford V8, its design limitations for emissions and economy left it underpowered, even by 1980s standards. The 3.8 Ford in your Cougar is a testament to the challenges of balancing reliability with complex components like timing covers. The 3800's legendary status among GM engines is well-deserved, it’s a powerhouse of reliability compared to earlier iterations like the 3.8 Buick. And the Quad 4? A missed opportunity, indeed
We love these kinds of debates, so keep them coming! Everyone, drop your thoughts, share this video, and hit subscribe to keep the conversation rolling....
Have a good day.
Disagree all you want, but facts don’t lie... The Chevy 2.2 earned its rep for weak performance, especially compared to real muscle. And yeah, the 305 could run, but it was no powerhouse. The 255 Ford? Ford totally botched it, low compression, weak power, and smog equipment strangled it. As for the 3.8, early versions were junk. Sure, the 3800 improved, but BEST? Not when Buick’s 455 existed....
Disagree about the 255 Ford V8? Fair point, it’s still a Windsor block, but Ford cut compression and flow to chase fuel economy, killing its power. Sure, the Chevy 305 had leaks, but it could run forever with care. And the 3800? Absolute legend
My brother has a Lotus Elise and because it was imported into the United States it has a turbo charged 1.8L Acura engine.
Wow, a Lotus Elise with a turbocharged 1.8L Acura engine?
That’s a wild combo and an impressive build! The Elise is known for its lightweight handling and sharp cornering, so adding the power and reliability of an Acura turbo engine must make it a real rocket on the streets! Acura’s 1.8L engines, especially with a turbo, are known for their high-revving performance and durability. It's a unique contrast to the big displacement V8s we talk about here, but it shows how creative enthusiasts are in pushing boundaries with imports and domestic swaps alike.
We love hearing stories about unique cars like this, so thanks for sharing..
The Volvo 2.8v6 that was made together with Peugeot and Renault was a very bad engine. It was made with 90dgr angle , first it was made as a v8 , and knowing for its rough stationair running. The camshafts failure are notorius for that engine, don’t buy i would say
Thank you so much for your comment.
The Volvo 2.8 V6, also known as the PRV (Peugeot-Renault-Volvo) engine, has quite a notorious reputation. Its 90-degree design, originally intended for a V8, caused inherent balance issues that led to that rough idle you mentioned. The camshaft failures, especially due to poor oiling, became a significant weak point, making maintenance a nightmare. Interestingly, it found its way into cars like the DeLorean, which struggled with similar issues. For enthusiasts looking for reliability and performance, it’s no wonder this engine gets a big thumbs down.
We appreciate you sharing your insight! Let’s keep the conversation going-tell us about your favorite or least favorite engines in the comments. And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engaging discussions.
Hope to see you in our next video! Wishing you an awesome weekend filled with horsepower and great memories.
Stay tuned
2.7 was shit because the water pump was run of the timing chain, the TIGHT side of it... chain harmonics kill the bearings of the pump
3.1 gm was not shit, nor was the 3.8, or the "duke", or the rotary....
every 3.6 issue ive encountered was due to "gas and go" soccermom mentality (marginal if any maintainence, and oil changes)
Thanks for sharing your insight! You’ve hit the nail on the head regarding the 2.7 - that water pump design was a ticking time bomb. Running it off the tight side of the timing chain was an engineering oversight that doomed the bearings to premature failure. Chain harmonics and stress were indeed major contributors, making regular maintenance essential for prolonging its life-though even that wasn’t always enough.
The 3.8, in particular, gained a reputation for durability and even powered some memorable performance models with the supercharged L67 variant.
You also make a valid point about the "duke" 2.5 and GM’s rotary efforts. While the "Iron Duke" wasn’t flashy, it was a reliable workhorse. The rotary, though short-lived, showcased GM’s innovation at the time.
Your comments on the 3.6 are spot-on. It’s a strong engine, but the "gas-and-go" mindset leads to problems, especially with timing chain wear and oil consumption. Regular maintenance and proper oil levels are critical to keeping it running smoothly.
Let’s keep this conversation rolling! Share your experiences, like this video, and don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters....
I had a Chrysler new Yorker 3.0 engine I bought it at 79,000 miles burning oil I was adding one qt every week then at 130,000 miles then I was adding 2 or qts a week then at 197,000 miles it just cut off and stop running 😢 but very reliable car
Thank you so much for sharing your experience with the Chrysler New Yorker
It's always interesting to hear about the longevity of cars, especially when they're pushing through issues like oil consumption. The 3.0 engine, while known for its durability, wasn't immune to some of the common issues that can arise as cars age, like oil burning. It's impressive that it kept going as long as it did before finally calling it quits at 197,000 miles! Even though it had its share of challenges, the fact that it was a reliable ride for you really speaks to the quality of Chrysler's engineering back then.
To everyone reading, if you have your own muscle car stories or experiences with engines like the 3.0 Chrysler, please feel free to share in the comments below
Don’t forget to hit that like button, share this video, and subscribe for more amazing American Muscle Car content.
Let’s keep this conversation rolling and celebrate these legendary machines
Way too many ADS.
Hey there! Thanks for your feedback on the ads - we totally understand where you’re coming from! But we’re always listening and open to ways to make the experience even better for you within what’s possible under RUclips's guidelines. Let us know if you have other ideas or suggestions - we’re here for it. Thank you.
strange, i've not seen one... in 10 years... maybe your using your browser wrong. hint: INSTALL AN AD BLOCKER, the internet (web sites ARE NOT USABLE without one)
Nothing really wrong with the Ford 4.2 V8 they just deliberately made it underpowered. Virtually anything you can do with any Windsor V8 would improve even the 255.
there’s nothing inherently wrong with the Ford 4.2 V8 (the 255).
It was built during tough times for performance engines, with emissions regulations and fuel economy taking the front seat. But here’s the good news: it shares the Windsor DNA
With upgrades like a better camshaft, headers, and a 4-barrel carb, you can unlock its true potential. Windsor engines love mods, and the 255 is no exception. Keep the conversation going
Share your favorite builds, comment your thoughts, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead goodness. Hope to see you in the next video, have an awesome day
Never heatd of much trouble with a GM 3800 altho' a bit underpowered in heavier vehicles.
@A.LeeMorrisJr Thanks for sharing your insight
the GM 3800 is well-known for its reliability, often regarded as one of the most durable V6 engines of its time. It did shine in terms of longevity, but as you pointed out, it could feel a bit underpowered in heavier cars, especially when compared to some of the beefier V8s we love in muscle cars. That said, its efficiency and smooth operation made it a favorite for many enthusiasts.
If you’re into exploring more powerful classics, what’s your take on GM’s small block V8 or the iconic LS-series engines? Let’s keep the muscle car discussion going! Everyone else watching, let us know your favorite GM engines, drop a comment, and don’t forget to share this video.
Subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more deep dives into the cars and engines that define the golden age of American horsepower
Have a a great day.
My mother had a 89 Thunderbird LX with no problems it had 126,000
@jimlangley4779 That’s awesome
The '89 Thunderbird LX was a gem in Ford’s lineup-luxurious yet sporty, with that smooth ride that made it stand out. It’s great to hear your mother’s car held up so well, 126,000 miles with no problems is impressive! Ford really nailed reliability with those models, especially with their V6 and optional V8 engines. They truly don’t make them like they used to
By the way, we’re diving deep into American muscle cars like the Thunderbird here on Muscle Car Masters. What’s your favorite memory of that LX? We’d love to hear more stories like yours in the comments. And to everyone else, let’s keep the muscle car legacy alive, comment with your favorite classic, share this with fellow car enthusiasts, and make sure to hit that subscribe button for more incredible car stories and content.
Let’s keep this community roaring...have a great weekend.
3.5 eco boost had cam phaser issues not timing chain stretch
Great point....The 3.5 EcoBoost did face its fair share of challenges, and you're absolutely right-cam phaser issues were a hot topic. While the timing chain itself often held up, the phasers sometimes couldn't keep up with the engine's high performance demands, leading to that infamous 'rattling' sound during startup. Ford tackled this with updates over the years, especially on newer generations. Despite these hiccups, the 3.5 EcoBoost has proven itself as a powerhouse, delivering impressive torque and horsepower while maintaining solid efficiency.
To everyone out there-what’s your take on Ford’s EcoBoost engines? Share your experiences or thoughts in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome engine talk and muscle car history. Thanks for being part of our community-your input fuels our passion. Have a fantastic weekend, and we can’t wait to see you in the next video.
Stay awesome
One kinda leads to the other lol
Similar to the ford 5.4
@@MuscleCarMasters68😊
@@Bill-mj8hf Great point, The Ford 3.5 EcoBoost, like the 5.4, has had its ups and downs. Cam phaser issues and that infamous startup rattle stirred debates, but Ford made strides to improve durability in later versions. Still, the 3.5 EcoBoost remains a torque-packed powerhouse with remarkable efficiency and reliability when maintained properly. What do you think about Ford’s EcoBoost engines? Got any stories or favorites? Drop them in the comments
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic car talk. Stay legendary, have an amazing day, and hope to see you in the next video....
I can't agree with most of these. In fact some engines like the 3.8 gm are one of the best engines ever made.
Yes, the 3.8 GM engine has earned a loyal fanbase! It's a powerhouse of durability and efficiency, especially in its later years. However, earlier versions had their fair share of challenges, like intake manifold issues and head gasket problems that left many owners frustrated. Over time, GM refined the 3.8 into one of the most reliable V6 engines out there, proof that even a rough start doesn’t define a legacy.
This discussion highlights why we need all voices in the Muscle Car community. Every engine has its story good, bad, and misunderstood and together, we can uncover them all. Drop your thoughts, experiences, or favorite engines in the comments. Don’t forget to share this video with fellow car enthusiasts and subscribe for more deep dives into the legends of American Muscle Cars.
Thanks for being part of the ride, and have an amazing day
Hope to see you in the next video
The 2.5 non turbo subaru engine was the issue, not the turbo
The 2.5L non-turbo Subaru engine had its fair share of issues-primarily head gasket problems. Subaru enthusiasts often say it wasn’t built to handle as much as its turbocharged counterpart, which had reinforced internals. Interestingly, the turbo 2.5 engines found in models like the WRX and STI were more robust, with better cooling and head gasket durability, making them the go-to choice for performance fans. The non-turbo version, while reliable for daily driving, just couldn’t handle stress as well over time, especially under poor maintenance.
For us American Muscle fans, it’s like comparing a small-block Chevy that’s bone stock to one built for racing-engineering makes all the difference
What’s your take on reliability versus performance? Drop a comment below, share this with fellow car enthusiasts, and don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into engine stories.
Hope to see you in the next video.
Have a great day...
Glad my old v6 3000 Essex is not on your list
Thanks so much for your comment
The 3000 Essex V6 is definitely a unique engine with a lot of history, and we appreciate you sharing your experience. It's interesting to think about how engines like that have contributed to the evolution of muscle cars. While we don't always get to cover every engine, we love hearing about all the diverse options that made muscle cars what they are today
If you have more insights about the Essex V6 or any other engines you think deserve more attention, feel free to drop them in the comments below. We’re always looking for more interesting stories and technical details to share with the community.
Remember to like, comment, and share with fellow muscle car fans.
And don’t forget to subscribe to stay updated on all our latest content about American muscle cars! Your support helps us keep the conversation going. Thanks again for being part of the Muscle Car Masters community
A video about terrible engine yet the 1st engine they show is the engine that SAVED gm
Hey there, thanks for sharing your thoughts
You’re absolutely right-the first engine shown in the video, while flawed in some ways, was pivotal in GM’s history. Engines like the Buick 3800 V6, for example, may not have been perfect at first, but their later versions became legendary for reliability and performance, literally keeping GM alive during tough times. Sometimes, even the most criticized engines play a major role in automotive history, and that’s part of what makes this journey so fascinating for us muscle car fans.
We’d love to hear what engine YOU think saved GM or even changed the game for muscle cars. Drop your thoughts below, share this video with your friends, and don’t forget to hit that subscribe button to keep these epic conversations alive.
Thanks for being part of the Muscle Car Masters community! Hope to see you in the next video.
Have a great day, and keep cruising
The Buick 3300 series engine was one of the best engines ever built for semi-compact cars it was a awesome engine and besides routine maintenance it lasted 430,000 MI all that ever had to be done to it was a water pump and a starter
Thanks for sharing your experience with the Buick 3300 series engine
It truly is one of the underrated gems of the muscle car world. With that kind of longevity 430,000 miles on just routine maintenance-it’s clear that Buick built something special. The 3300 was designed for efficiency and durability, making it an ideal engine for semi-compact cars of its time. That’s the heart of American muscle, reliability with power. If you're a fan of classic engines like this, drop a comment below, share your thoughts, and don't forget to subscribe for more deep dives into muscle car history.
Let’s keep the passion for these iconic machines alive...
The 3800 engine was a beast engine and I have also had a 2.5 and 3.1 and 2200 and they were all good engines the 2200 I had to replace icm every year
Thank you for sharing your experience with the 3800 engine and others like the 2.5, 3.1, and 2200
The 3800 truly earned its reputation as a powerhouse, delivering reliability and performance. The 2200 was solid, though it seems the ICM issue was a common hiccup for many owners. It’s fascinating how these engines shaped GM’s lineup through the years. Muscle Car fans, what’s your take? Share your stories about these engines in the comments your insights fuel this community
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more muscle car history and fun.
Hope to see you in the next videos, have a great day....
@MuscleCarMasters68 the 3.1 I had they were a great engine always ran great and I done the maintenance on them the 2.5 was a beast of an engine I had it in a couple of cars and it done great and kept the maintenance up also
@@tommybutler7669 Thank you for sharing your experience with the 3.1 and 2.5 engines-two unsung heroes in GM's lineup. It’s amazing to hear how good maintenance kept these engines running strong-something every gearhead can appreciate. Muscle Car fans, let’s hear your stories! Whether you’ve had a 3.1, a 2.5, or even the mighty 3800 under the hood, share your experiences in the comments.
Have a good day, we are waiting for more information from all fans to claim whether is failed or not.
Thank you so much.
@MuscleCarMasters68 the 3.1 I had it never gave any type of issues with it I kept up with maintenance everytime had to the 2.5 I had in a celebrity and she was a good engine I ended up putting another one in that car due to a hole in the block and the 3800 that was a strong engine had over 225k on miles and I ended up dropping a cylinder on the engine but I had great luck with them
@@tommybutler7669 Thanks for sharing your story! The 3.1, 2.5, and 3800 engines really show what GM was capable of when they put reliability at the forefront. The 3800, in particular, is known for its toughness, and getting 225k miles is no small feat! It’s awesome to hear that with good maintenance, these engines kept running strong. It’s always a bit of luck too, right?
If you have more information, pls share it with us...
have a good day
hope to see you next time.
So much insinformation here. Many of these problems blown out of proportion by the speaker here. It seems like he went to "Consumer Reports" or some other car maintenance monitoring site and got info on basic engine problems, then plotted all the consequential issues that could result if a basic problem was left unchecked.
A prime example is the Toyota 3VZ-E. He displayed pictures of any Toyota 3VZ engine except the one he wanted to crap on. He errored in naming the actual engine designation and its use in particular vehicles, then "listed" everything he knew that could happen as a result of a blown head gasket. He failed to realized (as many other misinformed people - negligent original owners and ignorant secondary owners, dumb repair technicians, and dedicated rock-climbers) or inform his viewers that Toyota had an active recall on the 3VZ-E in Four Runners and Pickups, and they replaced head gaskets in those vehicles with mileage in excess of 100,000 miles - free of charge. This is personal experience.
With my head gasket replaced at 103,000 miles, my truck now has 370,000 miles with no further head gasket issues. this video should be titled "THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN TO THESE ENGINES IF YOU DON'T PROPERLY MAINTAIN THEM." Try starting with late model vehicles that has turbocharged engines and instruct people on how to manage the flaws in those engines because there will be many, and manufacturers will not accept responsibility for their poorly designed products.
Thank you for sharing your detailed feedback and personal experience! It’s crucial to address misinformation and provide accurate context, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify. You’re absolutely right about the Toyota 3VZ-E. Toyota’s recall program for head gasket replacements in the 3VZ-E engines in 4Runners and Pickups is a key point that should have been highlighted. Your truck reaching 370,000 miles after a recall repair is a testament to the durability of these engines when properly maintained.
The title suggestion, focusing on maintenance, is spot-on. Many engine problems are indeed magnified when regular upkeep is neglected. Late-model turbocharged engines, as you noted, often require meticulous care to manage inherent flaws, and their manufacturers aren’t always transparent about these issues.
We strive to bring accurate, engaging content to our viewers. In future videos, we’ll emphasize preventative maintenance and delve deeper into issues like turbocharged engine care and how to identify manufacturer recalls.
To our community: if you’ve had similar experiences with engines that exceeded expectations after maintenance, or if you have tips for managing flaws in newer engine designs, let us know in the comments. Your stories are invaluable.
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more engaging discussions, accurate information, and fascinating stories from enthusiasts like you. Together, we can build a knowledgeable and vibrant car community....
@@MuscleCarMasters68my comment wouldn't post. Thanks for responding to me.
@@supercleaner Thank you and have a great day. hope to see you next videos.
I've worked on a Cadillac V8-6-4
Thanks so much for sharing your experience with the Cadillac V8-6-4
It’s great to hear from someone with firsthand knowledge of this unique engine. The V8-6-4 was definitely ahead of its time, pioneering the technology of cylinder deactivation, but it had its share of challenges, particularly with reliability and complexity. It was introduced in the 1981 Cadillac Seville and could switch between 8, 6, or 4 cylinders, aiming to improve fuel efficiency without compromising performance. Unfortunately, the system was often prone to malfunction and did not last long in the Cadillac lineup.
For anyone tuning in, if you're interested in the full story behind the V8-6-4, its impact on Cadillac's reputation, and how it compares to other performance innovations of its era, drop a comment below
Let’s keep this conversation going-don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more in-depth discussions about American muscle cars
We’d love to hear your thoughts on this groundbreaking engine
the 3.5 ecoboost shouldnt be on here even the first model was a good engine if maintained correctly. gotta love ppl that buy a turbocharged engine and think they never need to change the oil
You're spot on
The 3.5 EcoBoost is a solid performer when cared for properly-regular oil changes are key for any turbocharged engine! Neglecting basic maintenance often gives great engines a bad rep. The early EcoBoost models faced criticism, but much of it boiled down to improper upkeep. Ford really packed power and efficiency into this V6, making it a game-changer. Let’s hear from everyone-what's your take on turbocharged engines in muscle cars? Drop a comment, share your stories, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more gearhead fun
Hope to see you in the next video. Have a great day....
Disagree on the 2.5, 3.8 and 305 engines
Thanks for your comment! Disagreements like this fuel the passion we all share for classic American Muscle Cars. The 2.5 Iron Duke, 3.8 Buick V6, and Chevy 305 V8 have sparked endless debates. While the Iron Duke was loved for its fuel efficiency, it struggled in performance. The 3.8 V6, especially the turbo versions, brought some serious power later on, but early reliability issues caused doubts. The 305, while not as exciting as its big-block brothers, served as a reliable base for countless builds.
Let’s keep the discussion alive what are your thoughts on how these engines performed in muscle cars or daily drivers? We’d love to hear your experiences. Drop your knowledge in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars to keep this conversation roaring.
Hope to see you in the next video. Stay legendary, and have a great day
Not 1 of those 1.0 Suzuki engine photos is a picture of the engine you where talking about!
Thank you for pointing that out
We always aim to showcase the most accurate information and visuals, so we appreciate you catching this. The 1.0L Suzuki engine we referenced is a unique piece of engineering history, especially with its lightweight design and remarkable efficiency for its size. It’s fascinating how such compact engines can punch above their weight, even earning a spot in discussions alongside bigger performance beasts!
We’ll work on improving the visuals in future videos to better match the engines we talk about. Your input helps make our channel even better for the entire muscle car community. Let us know if there’s another engine or topic you’d like us to dive into-your feedback fuels us!
Keep the comments rolling, share with fellow car enthusiasts, and don’t forget to subscribe for more! Hope to see you in the next video. Have an awesome day, gearheads...
Could have made it alot shorter. Basicly every engine produced by GM since 1970
Almost every engine of the same vintage made by Ford. All rotary engines.
Thanks for the comment.
You’re right-there were a lot of engines from GM and Ford in that era that had their fair share of issues, especially as automakers scrambled to meet emissions regulations and fuel economy standards. Engines like the GM 305, some of the smog-strangled 350s, and Ford’s 351M certainly had their critics. And yes, rotary engines had their own reliability quirks, though Mazda stuck with them for a while.
But let’s not forget the gems of that time! The Chevy LS6 454, Ford’s Boss 351 Cleveland, and even the underrated AMC 401 showed how powerful engines could still thrive. They proved there were exceptions to the struggles of the ‘70s.
What are your thoughts on which engines deserved better reputations? Drop a comment, share your favorites, and don’t forget to subscribe for more muscle car history
Hope to see you in the next video.
Have a great day...
There are actually 3 different versions of the Buick 3800 engine one was great the others were junk. One version only lasted 2 years it was such a piece of crap. It had a 92% failure rate for 5 years of operation.
There were indeed three versions of the Buick 3800, and each had its own story. The Series I was a solid engine, known for its reliability and strong performance. It laid the groundwork for the 3800's reputation. Then came the Series II, a true powerhouse that balanced efficiency and performance, earning its place as one of the best V6s ever made. However, the Series III had its share of issues, particularly in the early runs. If you’re talking about the infamous first-generation 3800, its short lifespan and high failure rate were due to design flaws like head gasket problems and cooling inefficiencies.
The 5.4 triton 2v was actually pretty damn good. Look at how many 10th generation F150's are still on the road. Millions
Yes, the 5.4 Triton 2V was a reliable workhorse! It powered countless 10th-generation F-150s that are still hauling, towing, and running strong today. Its robust design, with a forged crankshaft and iron block, made it durable under heavy loads. Ford’s modular engine platform also made parts readily available, further boosting its longevity. While some experienced spark plug or coil pack issues, proper maintenance kept them going for hundreds of thousands of miles. It’s a testament to Ford’s engineering. What’s your experience with this engine? Comment below, share your thoughts, and don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more...
Have a good day.
The 4.0 duel overhead cam v6 should be in that list for timing chane faileure
The 4.0L DOHC V6, especially the version used in models like the Ford Explorer, definitely deserves attention for its timing chain issues. Ford's choice of plastic timing chain guides in this engine led to premature wear, often resulting in rattling sounds and, eventually, failure if not addressed early. For those who owned these engines, the repair could be costly since it often involved removing the engine to replace the guides and chains-a major headache for what’s otherwise a powerful engine with strong torque.
Thanks for bringing this up! If anyone else has had experience with the 4.0L V6 or other engines known for timing chain problems, drop your stories in the comments below. And for more discussions like these on engines, maintenance tips, and American Muscle Car history, don't forget to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters...
Honestly, I can’t believe everyone overlooks the 4.0 DOHC V6 when it’s had some of the most notorious timing chain failures. Everyone’s hyped about its power, but what’s power worth if you’re constantly worried about that chain giving out? In my book, reliability should count for a lot more than hype, and this engine has proven to be way too risky for serious muscle car fans.
@@KeithGreene-k1v Absolutely, you’ve got a solid point about the 4.0 DOHC V6. Power alone doesn't make up for the risks involved, especially with an engine as infamous for timing chain issues as this one. Ford’s use of plastic chain guides really put this engine on the map for reliability concerns, as those guides would often wear down far too quickly, leading to that dreaded chain rattle. If left unchecked, it could even lead to catastrophic failure, sidelining an otherwise powerful engine.
And you're right-reliability matters a lot in the muscle car world! Many enthusiasts who want that classic American power also expect their engines to last, especially with the investment of time and money in these builds. While the 4.0 V6 delivers impressive torque, this kind of maintenance risk makes it a tough sell for serious muscle car fans who value dependability.
If anyone else has experiences with timing chain issues in the 4.0L or other engines with similar quirks, we’d love to hear your story! Join the conversation below, and remember to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more insights on engine builds, maintenance, and the history that makes American Muscle so legendary. Thanks again for sparking this great discussion....
Boy , what a bunch of crap has been built and unleashed on the public. The engineers and accountants and corporate greed goons should feel the cost out of their salaries.
Thank you for sharing your passionate thoughts
It’s true that some of the decisions made in the muscle car era were driven by a mix of innovation, cost-cutting, and sometimes corporate missteps. We’ve seen brilliant engineering paired with compromises due to financial constraints, leaving behind both legends and lessons. Engines like the Oldsmobile 5.7L Diesel or the Vega’s aluminum-block motor remind us how innovation can stumble under pressure. But let’s not forget, those same companies also delivered iconic machines like the HEMI, Boss 429, and LS6 Chevelle that continue to awe us today.
This community thrives on discussions like these
Let us know what’s your favorite (or least favorite) example of engineering decisions gone wrong? Your thoughts help keep this passion alive, so don’t forget to comment, share your stories, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters
Together, we’ll keep these memories-and debates-roaring
The 305 is one of the most hearty v8's ever made. Fight me in the comments section 😤
The 305 V8 definitely has its place in muscle car history
Known for its durability and versatility, it powered everything from Camaros to trucks, proving itself as a dependable workhorse. While it might not boast the raw power of the 350, its smaller bore made it a reliable, efficient option for daily drivers and weekend warriors alike. But hey, muscle car fans-what do you think? Share your take in the comments
Let’s keep this engine debate alive.
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic discussions. Hope to see you in the next video, have an amazing day
Any engine regardless the maker if poor development and research is rushed you get a bad product
Thank you, @jimlangley4779, for your insightful comment! You're absolutely right, solid development and research are key to producing legendary engines. That’s why the iconic American muscle cars we love, like the Ford 410 V8 or the HEMI engines, stand the test of time. These were crafted with passion and precision, not just to perform but to roar with power.
so great when you gave us a lot of meaningful information, hope to see you next videos.
1980 Chevy (GMC) 5.7 Diesel engine.
Thank you for your comment and sharing your thoughts on the 1980 Chevy (GMC) 5.7 Diesel engine
Indeed, it has a controversial reputation, often labeled as one of GM's more challenging designs. Its conversion from a gas engine to a diesel without robust modifications led to reliability issues, but it was also a bold experiment in the era of rising fuel prices. We appreciate your insights! What’s your take on other GM engines from that time? Let us know in the comments, and don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more classic car stories...
Have a great day.
The quad 4 was an Oldsmobile engine
Thanks for pointing that out, @jimlangley4779
the Quad 4 was an innovative Oldsmobile engine introduced in the late ’80s, known for its high-revving DOHC design and impressive performance for a four-cylinder. While not a traditional “muscle car” engine, it played a unique role in GM’s history and showed how Oldsmobile pushed engineering boundaries. Speaking of muscle cars, let us know your favorite American V8 powerhouse
Everyone here, keep the conversation alive, comment your thoughts, share with fellow car enthusiasts, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome insights and stories about these legendary machines....
bruh i have to completely disagree on the chrysler 2.7l v6 with you bro! my aunt had a 96 sebring and i think that thing is still on the road! it is a 1 one of a kind sebring because it has a bmw where the chrysler logo was on the grille.. my aunt sold it with about 180,000 miles on it because the ragtop was shot it ran pefect without ever having a head gasket blow..... i actually saw it on the road before with a new black ragtop on it... if my aunts old sebring made it to 180k before she got rid of it and still ran without that head gasket thing happening you are incorrect sir!
Hey there
Thanks for sharing your experience with the Chrysler 2.7L V6 in your aunt’s ’96 Sebring,
it’s great to hear that some of these engines went the distance. You’ve got a unique story with that custom BMW logo on the grille! While your aunt’s Sebring hitting 180k without head gasket issues is impressive, it’s worth noting the 2.7L earned its reputation for trouble due to oil sludge problems, often from poor maintenance or design flaws. Many engines didn’t make it that far without issues, but clearly, your aunt's Sebring was a rare gem
We love hearing stories like yours, so keep them coming! If anyone else has a unique experience or thoughts, drop a comment below. Don’t forget to share this video with your friends and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more awesome discussions. Hope to see you in the next video, have a fantastic day...
Every engine has a 100% fail rate.....
Well, if the body rusts out first.
@mpetersen6 engine still going to fail sometime. Entropy is a bish
Vega 2.3 liter = WORST EVER, I KNOW FIRST HAND.😢😢😢
Respect your take, but gotta say, the Vega 2.3 wasn’t all bad. Chevy pushed boundaries with an aluminum block, and while it had flaws, early models showed promise when maintained. I had one, dialed in right, and it ran like a champ for years. Sure, it wasn’t a V8 beast, but it wasn’t meant to be.
Thank you for sharing your firsthand experience with the Vega 2.3-liter engine, @bigfoottoo2841.
Many enthusiasts remember that engine’s reliability issues overheating, oil burning, and early wear were common complaints back in the day. Your honest feedback helps everyone here gain a better understanding of the shortcomings that some American cars faced during certain eras. Still, it’s all part of the rich tapestry of automotive history. We’d love to hear from others who’ve had similar or different experiences.
Let’s keep this conversation rolling: drop your thoughts in the comments, share this video with fellow car lovers, and don’t forget to subscribe for more American Muscle Car insights...
every late model chrysler engine is junk, 2.0l, 2.4l, 3.7l, 4.7l, 5.7l, 6.4l, etc!!!!!! pure plastic junk!!!!!!!!!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! It's true that many enthusiasts and mechanics have raised concerns about certain late-model Chrysler engines. Models like the 2.0L, 2.4L, and 3.7L have indeed faced issues, particularly around durability and excessive use of plastic components that can impact long-term reliability. For example, the 3.7L V6 was notorious for oil sludge build-up if not meticulously maintained, while the 4.7L V8 also had some challenges with cooling and longevity under heavy use.
Even the Hemi engines, like the 5.7L and 6.4L, which are praised for performance, aren't free from criticism. Some owners report that the cylinder deactivation (MDS) in the 5.7L can cause lifter and camshaft wear over time, an issue that’s had many switching off MDS to extend the engine’s life. It’s a love-hate relationship for many, appreciating the power but frustrated with the engineering choices.
Let us know what you think! Are you a fan of Chrysler’s recent engines, or do you agree that they're over-reliant on plastic components? We’d love to hear your experiences-share your stories in the comments, and don’t forget to like, subscribe, and join us in celebrating all things muscle....
While some Chrysler engines had issues, labeling them all as 'junk' seems a bit harsh. The 5.7L HEMI, for instance, has a strong reputation for performance and reliability when properly maintained, and the 6.4L HEMI is known for its impressive power output in the performance market. Chrysler’s lineup includes engines that offer a good balance of efficiency and power. Like any brand, some models might have had their setbacks, but many Chrysler engines have shown solid longevity and value when cared for correctly. It’s more about maintenance and usage than just the make of the engine.
Thank you for sharing such a balanced perspective! You’re absolutely right-Chrysler’s lineup, especially the HEMI engines, has achieved a reputation for serious power and performance. The 5.7L and 6.4L HEMIs have been workhorses in the performance world, delivering a satisfying punch for muscle car enthusiasts. And while these engines can handle a lot, maintenance truly makes the difference. For instance, regular oil changes and careful monitoring of the Multi-Displacement System (MDS) can help extend the life of the 5.7L HEMI, especially since MDS-related wear on lifters and camshafts is a known concern among owners.
You’re also spot-on about Chrysler’s use of plastic components-this trend has raised some eyebrows in the community. Certain engines, particularly the 2.0L and 2.4L, have been known to struggle with plastic components that just don’t hold up under long-term stress, which can impact durability and drive up repair costs. However, when it comes to the overall lineup, Chrysler has engineered some real performers that, with proper care, deliver fantastic reliability and longevity.
So, what’s your take? Have you had any experiences with the MDS system or other Chrysler engines? We’d love to hear more stories, insights, or even those quirks you've encountered under the hood. Keep the conversation going in the comments, hit that like button if you’re passionate about American muscle, and subscribe for more in-depth dives into the engines we love...
The 3.8l engine in its second version is an excellent engine, 1st iteration, not so much.
The second iteration of the 3.8L engine truly shines as a reliable powerhouse. The first version, while innovative, faced its fair share of challenges-especially in durability. By the second go-round, Buick engineers had it nailed, delivering a durable and efficient V6 that powered everything from muscle cars to family sedans. What do you think about its turbocharged versions? Let’s keep this discussion alive-drop your thoughts below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more epic car talk.
Hope to see you in the next video
Wishing you horsepower-filled days and a fantastic journey ahead
Almost got killed in saturn cause 1.9 cause stuck erg valve
I used work at saturn i brought pontiac grandam best car i ever owned
Thanks so much for sharing your story and experiences with us
That stuck EGR valve on the Saturn sounds like a scary situation glad you’re here to tell the tale. It’s interesting to hear from someone who worked at Saturn; you must have some unique insights into those cars. And it’s awesome to hear how much you love your Pontiac Grand Am! They were definitely reliable and had that classic American spirit we all admire in muscle-inspired cars.
If you have any more stories or memories about American cars, we’d love to hear them. Everyone watching, let’s keep the conversation going share your favorite car stories or the most reliable muscle cars you’ve owned
Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more amazing car history, stories, and reviews.
Your support keeps us going..
@MuscleCarMasters68 my first car had posi traction
It saved me from killing someone
Guy set up to kill my ex-girlfriend
You are right about some engines cause worked at different dealships
Model have know problem they take off thousand off trade in
Thanks for sharing your incredible story and insights, it’s always fascinating to hear from someone with firsthand dealership experience! Your tale about posi traction saving lives is a powerful reminder of how engineering can make a difference in the real world. And you’re absolutely right about certain models having known issues that affect trade-ins-it’s a side of the industry we don’t always consider.
Have a great day... hope to see you next videos.
Man, I gotta say, I’ve owned plenty of cars, but that Grand Am can’t hold a candle to real muscle! Sure, it might’ve been reliable, but where’s the roar, the raw power? I’ll take an old-school GTO or Firebird any day over that 1.9-liter Saturn drama. You want the best Pontiac ever made? Look no further than the '69 Judge.
I think he meant 3400 it was a piece of crap blown head gaskets etc
Hey @darinrodriguez8551, thanks for sharing your thoughts
You're right that the 3400 engine had its issues, like blown head gaskets and reliability problems, especially in some of the earlier models. It’s interesting to see how different engines from that era hold up over time, right? But some muscle car enthusiasts still appreciate these cars for their raw power and the nostalgia they bring. The 3400 is part of that muscle car history, even if it wasn't the best on paper.
I encourage everyone to share their thoughts below, let's talk more about the cars we love
Don't forget to comment, share, and subscribe to the channel for more awesome content on American Muscle Cars. Hope to see you in the newest videos
Have a nice weekend
Obviously never owned a 3800 gm!!
Hey there! Thanks for your comment
The GM 3800 V6 is definitely one of the most legendary engines out there, and if you’ve ever owned one, you know exactly why it’s so beloved. Reliable, efficient, and surprisingly powerful for its size, this engine was a staple in everything from Buicks to Pontiacs, proving its versatility and durability. It wasn’t just about the numbers-it was about how it delivered smooth performance with that distinct GM touch.
From the Series I to the supercharged Series II and III, the 3800 carved out a reputation as one of GM’s best V6s, even earning a spot on Ward’s 10 Best Engines list. It's a powerhouse that often punches above its weight!
We’d love to hear your thoughts-share your experiences with the 3800 or any other iconic engine in the comments. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe. Hope to see you in the next video.
Have a great day...
all these crappy engines are great for the economy be grateful it kept people working
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
You make an excellent point about how even engines with issues helped keep people working and contributed to the economy. It's true that many of these "failed" engines, while not perfect, played important roles in their time and led to further innovations. However, like any mechanical system, even the best engines have their share of flaws, and it's important to discuss these openly. That's why I encourage everyone to share their experiences and thoughts, so we can keep the conversation going and dive deeper into the history of these engines. Let’s hear from you all whether you love them or hate them
Have a good day.