The 11 Most Terryfying Missiles In 2023

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 янв 2023
  • These are the 11 most dangerous missiles in the world. Hypersonics lead the way, but several conventional weapons still keep generals up at night; we included those, too.
    SOURCES: www.popularmechanics.com/mili...
    FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
    * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 1,4 тыс.

  • @levenusine5095
    @levenusine5095 Год назад +547

    Only an American could make a video where an old american ICBM with low yield warheads, is somehow better than Russian Hypersonic weapons.

    • @JOSSBLASTING
      @JOSSBLASTING Год назад +136

      Yes, that's american propaganda! I'm tired from that one!

    • @christopherbeckford3102
      @christopherbeckford3102 Год назад +1

      Everything from the United States is propaganda

    • @levenusine5095
      @levenusine5095 Год назад +1

      @@christopherbeckford3102 Hello, where are you from?

    • @jwhite0105
      @jwhite0105 Год назад +64

      Lol act like we haven’t seen your fight against Ukraine. Hahahaha no one is worried

    • @levenusine5095
      @levenusine5095 Год назад +1

      @@jwhite0105 You have been worried for decades. All your foreign policy is about either related to Russia or China. You even talk about them on presidential elections. And there are even old documents where you study how to separate Ukraine from Russia, because you would piss your pants if they joined again. You are actively involved in the war, with more than 100 billion dollars in aid, and 2/3 of that is military aid; you send equipment, munition; you borrow your satellites, comunications, even instructors and mercenaries, yet you pretend you are not there because is shameful how you can't still change the course of war, because now it's not a 3rd world country with outdated equipment, but a country that even has weapons that you don't; and that's the reason you try to change the subject from hypersonic weapons, to Ukraine.

  • @-x5858
    @-x5858 6 месяцев назад +45

    The AGM-183 ARRW ("Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon") was a hypersonic air-to-ground missile planned for use by the United States Air Force. Developed by Lockheed Martin, the boost-glide vehicle is propelled to a maximum speed of more than Mach 5[5] by a rocket motor before gliding toward its target.[6][7] The program was cancelled in March 2023 after multiple failed tests.[8]

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 4 месяца назад

      And it was NOT a maneuverable missile, the flight path was conventional ballistic. Even so, a shameful failure.

    • @KILLSWITCH_007
      @KILLSWITCH_007 3 месяца назад

      Agm 183 arrw is not a ballistic missile.. It's a boost glide missile and , yes it failed but atleast they does not lie like Russian zircon and khinzal.... Khinzal is a ballistic missile and even hypersonic... Zircon on the other hand doesn't even exist..

  • @vibecee4183
    @vibecee4183 Год назад +34

    Hypersonic rockets are still in the US dreams... 😂

    • @orkopayp9338
      @orkopayp9338 4 месяца назад

      russia and korea is ridicolous. china is real danger for next 50 years

    • @watcher63034
      @watcher63034 3 месяца назад

      Hypersonic rockets have been around for a long time. All ICBM's are hypersonic.

  • @megaharlequin3990
    @megaharlequin3990 Год назад +50

    One thing about the WZ-8, the "WZ (Wu Zhen, 无侦)" stands for "Unmaned Scout"

    • @osher87
      @osher87 10 месяцев назад +1

      Unmanned*

    • @edwardhochwand9063
      @edwardhochwand9063 6 месяцев назад

      @@osher87 WZ-8= Unmaned Scout Drone - 8

  • @utherq827
    @utherq827 Год назад +58

    RS-28 Sarmat: Well, I won't scare you and I won't appear on this list. 😁

    • @jeanlyguinea
      @jeanlyguinea 9 месяцев назад +4

      because its only russian dream hahaa

    • @user-qq5kv6nd6h
      @user-qq5kv6nd6h 6 месяцев назад

      @@jeanlyguinea one can find footages of this "dream" launches. Cartoons, like Kinzhal, Avangard and so on? ))

    • @TNTAH_1
      @TNTAH_1 4 месяца назад

      @@user-qq5kv6nd6h for stupid people it is cartoons)

    • @watcher63034
      @watcher63034 4 месяца назад

      Like the "impossible to intercept" Kinzahl missile? Russia has its hands full holding ground against Ukraine, let alone taking over the country. Like many of its claims, Russia is a paper dragon.

    • @argon8908
      @argon8908 3 месяца назад

      @@jeanlyguinea clueless lol

  • @theone4782
    @theone4782 8 месяцев назад +33

    the chinese spy balloon is the most powerful of them all

    • @peronliu6886
      @peronliu6886 6 месяцев назад

      nono.your mouth is even worse than that

    • @unclelou2366
      @unclelou2366 Месяц назад

      Well , the fact that balloon can penetrate that deep into US main land before we find out is rather scary

  • @blackphoenix114
    @blackphoenix114 Год назад +32

    When I heard about kinzhal misfired, I Knew at that moment this was just a western propaganda channel🤣

    • @schwanzuslongus4638
      @schwanzuslongus4638 Год назад +1

      Why you believe Russian Propaganda?

    • @thedonkilluminati96
      @thedonkilluminati96 Год назад

      ​@@schwanzuslongus4638 no such thing especially when the west have banned all russian media outlets

    • @scottmeehan2422
      @scottmeehan2422 Год назад +2

      The dagger is not a hypersonic missle as it cant move or adjust its speed once fired making it easy to shoot out the sky. As to me a proper hypersonic missle is one that can adjust its speed and move mid air to avoid counter measures. Such as the beast that is mbda's meteor BVR missle.

    • @kaijugabriel1685
      @kaijugabriel1685 8 месяцев назад

      Ok The khinzal was not intercepted and neither were the s300 destroyed by small drones 🤡👍 Tomorrow Russia will show their version of Iron Man too

  • @ZZZ2573
    @ZZZ2573 Год назад +81

    your ranking system is truly a comedy

    • @muammarmehatsketch711
      @muammarmehatsketch711 Год назад +24

      Because you're American 😂😂
      Because the truth does not suit your mood.. Russia🇷🇺💪 has the best missiles in the world... without a doubt

    • @b3ng260
      @b3ng260 Год назад +7

      ​@@muammarmehatsketch711you're not wrong, even the Indian brahmos was of Russian origin

    • @linusibaren
      @linusibaren Год назад +1

      ​@@muammarmehatsketch711 Yeah, and Lada has the best cars. Russia is known over the world for their ability to produce quality products. 🤣

    • @imergeradeaus
      @imergeradeaus Год назад

      ​@@linusibaren The Rockets are quality even the best so nothing funny here🧠 i as a human think its stupid lets stop War 🌏

    • @Issavibe3
      @Issavibe3 Год назад

      Why , because Russia’s missiles overtook their American counterparts??? Understandably..do you research dude

  • @kamalchandramoney3541
    @kamalchandramoney3541 Год назад +200

    The kinzhal successfully destroyed a deep underground arm depot 80 meters deep amidst a dense network of air defenses as well as Ukraine largest Depot. Where is the Trident 2 ,bulava or the sarmat which are easily the most feared icbm today.

    • @junkookbts1273
      @junkookbts1273 Год назад +2

      Lol

    • @gillwill5023
      @gillwill5023 Год назад +1

      Midget man LOL

    • @michaelsekalala8041
      @michaelsekalala8041 Год назад

      I agree, you these media are all about praising the fake us military complex

    • @chrisp2249
      @chrisp2249 Год назад

      The kinzhal did kill over a hundred Ukraine mercs in Lviv. Radar didn't even pick it up. That's when the Tik Tok morons realized they weren't in Kansas anymore and the enemy shoots back. America isn't on the top of the food chain anymore and realizes they waste too much money on expensive, highly logistical and man power intensive hardware. Russia and china produce excellent variants at a fraction of the cost.

    • @schwanzuslongus4638
      @schwanzuslongus4638 Год назад +3

      Russia claims that yeah. Which means absolutely nothing

  • @Liturgich
    @Liturgich Год назад +68

    Посмеялся когда девушка сказала, что типа кинжал это фигня и их было типа три выстрела, ну ну )))) А если б это было западное вооружение, то не удивлюсь, что в диферамбах расписала какое оно "крутое" ( как видим на примере украины - нет не крутое). Еще что меня повеселило - это то что в ролики непрерывно указывается словосочетание - россия применит ядерное оружие, только один нюанс об этом начали кричать западные страны, причем говорили о ядерной войне пугая россию, на что естественно ей пришлось отвечать. А сейчас я слышу как ваша пропаганда в том числе и на этом ролике поет о применении ядерного удара по украине - это россии не надо она рядом с украиной, а вот всяким уродам из америки британии это нормально, так как сидят далеко, поэтому при пройгрыше не удивлюсь, что запад это применит, так как запад - никогда людей не ценили и природу , главное для них только деньги. Западные уроды открыто говорят, что украина это их полигон для вооружений и тактик, так что делайте выводы., а народу украины я б посоветовал сбрасывать ваше руководство, которое получает бабосы от амеров и сделало из страны полигон.

    • @alexmilano9367
      @alexmilano9367 Год назад +1

      А я поржал с тебя кл@ун! Кинжал, калибр да хоть любое другое АНАЛоговнетное оружие в руках второй армии страны третьего мира( тоесть рф) прилетает только по жилым домам и сараям.

    • @Liturgich
      @Liturgich Год назад +3

      @@alexmilano9367 ахахах, да-да особенно когда товарищ Милано в теме полнейший ноль , то у подобных сказочников все прилетает в дома, главное верить своему единственному каналу тв в стране, единственной партии и главному единственному клоуну зеле)))) главное что они рассказывают нуну))) особенно смешно когда калибр с кинжалом сравнивают, что говорит о полном незнании человека темы вообще.

    • @adityasusantapanda
      @adityasusantapanda Год назад +12

      I'm with you my Russian brother...love from India...

    • @Liturgich
      @Liturgich Год назад +3

      @@adityasusantapanda with you too, brother💪

    • @adityasusantapanda
      @adityasusantapanda Год назад +5

      @@Liturgich we are always with our Russian brothers...what if Russia and India are far away...our hearts are together...

  • @sun_538
    @sun_538 Год назад +28

    Le indian missiles : to yae Kya Diwali Kae liyae rakha hai Kya

  • @nirvana3921
    @nirvana3921 Год назад +66

    To be precise, the DF-17 is a medium-range ballistic missile. It could not only attack the aircraft carrier fleet, but also turn the Japanese archipelago into a wasteland full of radioactive materials.
    🚀🗾💥🍄☢️

    • @Av0nKraD
      @Av0nKraD Год назад +15

      No No No Its just our new year flame work,not supose to be on the list

    • @user-ue4em8ui8u
      @user-ue4em8ui8u Год назад +7

      ​@@Av0nKraD 战忽局同志今晚加鸡腿😂

    • @liuyanbo6510
      @liuyanbo6510 8 месяцев назад

      No need. There's radioactive now.

    • @BestluckYan
      @BestluckYan 6 месяцев назад +5

      射程100公里,误差2000公里。只是防御武器

    • @XLrebbit777
      @XLrebbit777 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@Av0nKraD达瓦里氏,感谢你的辛苦工作😂

  • @frankcuritana8159
    @frankcuritana8159 Год назад +5

    No matter how impressive and destructive any missiles would destroy all living creatures on earth then there’s no point surviving because everything will just vanished for good.

  • @Google-Is-Idiot
    @Google-Is-Idiot Год назад +46

    In fact, WZ-8 is an unmanned reconnaissance aircraft, not a missile. And it can be recovered and reused.

  • @noneintel2119
    @noneintel2119 Год назад +4

    Chinese JL2 is an outdated missiles. Now they are using Jl3 with greater range and more accuracy in late 2022 for their subs. Jl4 is under development with much greater range than JL3.

  • @javidhaydari1268
    @javidhaydari1268 Год назад +53

    DF 17 is number two for the moment 👍

    • @chetansingh9980
      @chetansingh9980 Год назад +1

      Okk 😇

    • @user-xs2ru9on4s
      @user-xs2ru9on4s Год назад +2

      Они украли технологию в России, но не всё!

    • @n.c9653
      @n.c9653 Год назад +17

      @@user-xs2ru9on4s nonsense. It came out way before anything from Russia

    • @user-xs2ru9on4s
      @user-xs2ru9on4s Год назад

      @@n.c9653 the Chinese stole all the technology, the USSR also received nuclear weapons, they began to copy planes there too, and the development of these missiles was still in the USSR, the Americans were also in the 80s, last year Russia mastered 2 professors, now they are convicted and espionage, they are 5 years ago they transferred part of the technology to China! Why does China have missile speeds from Mach 5 to Mach 27, while the Chinese cannot reach Mach 10? They don't have the technology anymore, and Russia has used this missile for the first time in the world. By the way, the Chinese also stole laser technology from Russia!

    • @n.c9653
      @n.c9653 Год назад

      @@user-xs2ru9on4s you make many accusations without a single piece of evidence. Or you are still living in the 20th century. China has surpassed Russia is almost all military domain in the 21st. There is nothing to 'copy'.

  • @alexsandertroposci1631
    @alexsandertroposci1631 Год назад +4

    @The Buzz
    The WZ-8 is "Woo Zhéhn Bah". The H6K is also known as the Xian (Shyian) H6K. Also known as "Jzháhn Shéhn"/"God War"/God of War.

  • @user-fi2nv3ym2w
    @user-fi2nv3ym2w Год назад +37

    Avangard is not a rocket. This is the combat equipment of intercontinental ballistic missiles and medium-range missiles.. And the range there is naturally appropriate - up to the possibility of entering near-Earth orbit with subsequent entry into the atmosphere anywhere on the planet.. The Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile will host four such hypersonic units, and with the use of a special upper stage, which will act as an orbital bomber, dropping blocks in random order on targets located anywhere on the planet.

    • @GegeDxD
      @GegeDxD 10 месяцев назад +1

      How did you find out that it will host 4 units? 😂
      No one knows how many units the Sarmat can carry. According to the developers it can carry up to 15. So anything you say, it's nothing but misinformation.

    • @user-fi2nv3ym2w
      @user-fi2nv3ym2w 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@GegeDxD Firstly, the Sarmat cannot carry any missiles. Simply because he himself is a missile - a land-based intercontinental ballistic missile. Secondly, the payload itself depends on such a value as the "thrown weight", well, that is, how many kilograms or tons a ballistic missile can deliver to its maximum flight range. The Sarmat has a throwable weight for a maximum range of about eleven tons, and therefore any payload should fit into this parameter. If we take the Avangard combat equipment, then this is a hypersonic gliding unit, it is heavy in itself, and quite dimensional. The UR-100N UTTH rocket with a cast weight of 5.8 tons carries only one "vanguard", and in principle, according to the size of the cast weight, it was possible to place two such blocks, but the size of the head part did not allow this, two "vanguards" did not fit there stupidly, because initially this rocket was developed for a completely different combat equipment.

    • @alaskaaksala123
      @alaskaaksala123 3 месяца назад +1

      Uh, we know,it’s not a rocket… did you not see the title of the video??

  • @stevenbaer5999
    @stevenbaer5999 Год назад +18

    JL 2 can actually reach mach 20 that's actually too far fetch

  • @romanromanowski4470
    @romanromanowski4470 Год назад +114

    RS-28 Sarmat jest najniebezpieczniejszy. Może przenosić między innymi pociski Avangard (nie podano ile) jako alternatywę dla 10-15 klasycznych głowić nuklearnych. Nie wiem jak mogło go zabraknąć w tym zestawieniu?

    • @user-fi2nv3ym2w
      @user-fi2nv3ym2w Год назад +7

      Yes, in this list, you'll understand what the hell. The same "Avangard" is not a rocket. This is the combat equipment of intercontinental ballistic missiles and intermediate-range ballistic missiles.. Depending on the modification of the block itself (there are at least two of them), it has a different mass And the range there is naturally appropriate - up to the possibility of entering near-Earth orbit with subsequent entry into the atmosphere anywhere on the planet.. The Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile will be equipped with four or six such hypersonic blocks, and with the use of a special upper stage, which will act as an orbital bomber, dropping blocks in any order on targets located anywhere on the planet.

    • @romanromanowski4470
      @romanromanowski4470 Год назад +1

      @@user-fi2nv3ym2w 👍

    • @notarrono4310
      @notarrono4310 Год назад

      Semoga Indonesia mengakuisisi bom kinzal ...URAAA

    • @conpa3yma659
      @conpa3yma659 Год назад +1

      Этот "список" - пропагандистское дерьмо, переполненное ложью, фантазиями и вымыслом западной пропаганды.
      Более того, видеорассказчик не понимает о чем говорит. Перепутана классификация по дальности, скорости, назначению, типу боеголовок и т.д.

    • @FrancisGuite
      @FrancisGuite Год назад

      ​@@notarrono4310 believe me indondesian will never ever acquire kinzhal missiles even if they're willing to pay billions and billions of money..... Russia will never ever sell kinzhal to Indonesia so don't even hope about it as you're just gonna end up in depression mode

  • @mohdshahrilshuib2991
    @mohdshahrilshuib2991 Год назад +18

    Western still in testing phase on hypersonics. While russia have more type hypersonics ready in service.

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Год назад

      Western will catch up and surpass , so if they aren't mean to use it in a hurry , it's doesn't matter

    • @mohdshahrilshuib2991
      @mohdshahrilshuib2991 Год назад +3

      @@tluangasailo3663
      When western has catch up... Russia has already in new stage...

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Год назад

      @@mohdshahrilshuib2991 Russia already can't develop the same method US is pursuing i.e.,an air launched miniature hypersonic glide vehicle & scramjet air breathing hypersonic, compact yet effective, could be fit multiple inside stealth bomber and depending on the carriers , it's range could exceed 9000 km!

    • @johnhalford378
      @johnhalford378 Год назад +5

      Oof, imagine thinking Russian Tech is competent after the fall is USSR . Cant even invade a neighboring country with any type of competence.

    • @nikhilPUD01
      @nikhilPUD01 Год назад

      I don't believe any country have hypersonic missiles at all

  • @BlackholeJET369
    @BlackholeJET369 Год назад +18

    Without Brahmos this list is incomplete.

    • @user-us7di5ek5w
      @user-us7di5ek5w 9 месяцев назад +6

      technology given by russian? joky

    • @bettawala1234
      @bettawala1234 9 месяцев назад

      All critical technology of America devlop by nazi scientists.

    • @awhig2474
      @awhig2474 3 месяца назад +1

      Check your rear @@user-us7di5ek5w its Burning

  • @ConscienceCorner
    @ConscienceCorner 10 месяцев назад +1

    people discuss destruction, death, disaster,calamity, sadness, bitterness with seriousness without knowing the next victim let us embrace peace

  • @adityasusantapanda
    @adityasusantapanda Год назад +36

    Shaurya...Agni-6 & Brahmos 2 says hello...

    • @tforaodg
      @tforaodg Год назад +9

      India is not on the list

    • @FrEeTibEtXinJiAnGfReEpOkCoL
      @FrEeTibEtXinJiAnGfReEpOkCoL Год назад

      @@tforaodg hum duniya basane main yakeen rakh te hai naki barbad karne main chottu 😎 tum log lado aur maro 🤪

    • @ankitsingh-pf5lz
      @ankitsingh-pf5lz Год назад +2

      @@tforaodg we don't have flying tanks

    • @tforaodg
      @tforaodg Год назад +5

      @@ankitsingh-pf5lz
      That has nothing to do with India on the list.

    • @ankitsingh-pf5lz
      @ankitsingh-pf5lz Год назад

      @@tforaodg but Russian tanks are flying in Ukraine, we don't have that tech that's why we are not on the list.

  • @kimjong_un17
    @kimjong_un17 Год назад +26

    Made in China ☕☕☕😂😂😂

  • @skybughai
    @skybughai 6 месяцев назад

    1.agm-183,The second test of the project failed. So this project is still in progress, all indicators are expected rather than reality.
    2.WZ8, which is an abbreviation of Chinese "无人侦察机8(Wuren Zhenchaji 8,Unmanned Scout 8)", so it is more like a unmanned version of the black bird mini Plus.

  • @stevenbaer5999
    @stevenbaer5999 Год назад +7

    The faster the missile is, more friction it's going to cause. They actually need some type of metal or something else that is actually very extremely heat resistant.

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 Год назад

      Or you figure out how to cheat. Which i'm reasonably sure is what Russia did, due to how apparently relatively small changes are required to turn an old "fast" missile into a hyperfast missile.

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz Год назад +3

      That's the problem they have to overcome 😅

    • @travkin8842
      @travkin8842 Год назад +2

      Они летят в облаке плазмы

    • @Shinuchiha_99
      @Shinuchiha_99 Год назад

      @@travkin8842 so does the trident 2.. Mach 27 in orbit..

    • @golonawailus4312
      @golonawailus4312 Год назад +1

      China is leading on this material research

  • @reptilexcq2
    @reptilexcq2 Год назад +10

    Meanwhile, India had developed a missile that can fly at 60mph.

    • @snjr1021
      @snjr1021 7 месяцев назад +2

      Your country has no missile 😂😢😢😅😅😅

    • @user-ux5ir7uf2e
      @user-ux5ir7uf2e 6 месяцев назад

      meters per hour, got it.

  • @goranmancevski5550
    @goranmancevski5550 Год назад +3

    For Putin and Russian , this is good exercise for conventional fight.

    • @f-35lightningii6
      @f-35lightningii6 Год назад

      Russia training Avangard beast then course combat war Russia Avangard fails..

  • @zuenpin
    @zuenpin Год назад +1

    very good ^Q^

  • @fqeagles21
    @fqeagles21 Год назад +57

    Come on guys,i think mach 27 for the Avangard seems a bit of a big Stretch

    • @keydaaq1805
      @keydaaq1805 Год назад +26

      It will slow down to less than mach 5 when hitting a target. Its re-entering earth's atmosphere thats why its above mach 20

    • @fqeagles21
      @fqeagles21 Год назад +5

      @@keydaaq1805 ok that's make sense then

    • @Casseiopeia9720
      @Casseiopeia9720 Год назад

      You see how russian stupid propaganda can easily fool naive people Mach 27 only travels exosphere regime like Orbital flight vehicles you can see that glide vehicle animation projectiles dives towards below endosphere there's no Mach 27 can maneuver and travel at 60,000 ft with ambient temperature and your still dealing with Newtonian physics

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Год назад +12

      @@keydaaq1805 No, it does not slow down to Mach 5, no Ballistic missiles slow down that fast, especially this type of missiles.

    • @romankovalev7894
      @romankovalev7894 Год назад +6

      Relax. It's just a guided nuclear warhead. All intercontinental missiles since the 60s descend at such hypersonic speeds along a ballistic and, accordingly, predictable trajectory. And warheads fly from one missile to one place with a spread of a hundred kilometers. And Avangard allows you to hit targets from one missile at least throughout the country

  • @india5317
    @india5317 Год назад +21

    Le indian missiles : these are toys in front of me 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣

    • @peacedude-gy3zl
      @peacedude-gy3zl Год назад +1

      🇨🇳 you love china 😂😂😂 🤪

    • @india5317
      @india5317 Год назад +14

      @@peacedude-gy3zl I like west taiwan 😂🤣

    • @india5317
      @india5317 Год назад +5

      @@peacedude-gy3zl where is atmi power mulk Pakistan 🤔🤔😂😂😂🤣🤣

    • @SphereMan121
      @SphereMan121 Год назад +4

      Very arrogant comment.

    • @peacedude-gy3zl
      @peacedude-gy3zl Год назад +1

      @@india5317
      Me too😂👍

  • @thetrademarkclan
    @thetrademarkclan Год назад +3

    you talked about the Trident 2 but it didn't make the list?

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Год назад

      Obviously not, its an obsolete missile, its good, but not comparable with the new Russian Bulava, Sineva or Lyner, the Chinese JL-3 or the France M41, Triden exist because of life extension and they are developing a replacment missile, for good reason.

  • @AnimasiKanasia
    @AnimasiKanasia 8 месяцев назад

    As an Indonesian, I can confirm Singkong is the most terrifying.
    I mean Xingkong...

  • @Jeff-uq7iu
    @Jeff-uq7iu Год назад +1

    Look up minute man missile silo doors hit images, you'll know when you see it lol

  • @arround1
    @arround1 Год назад +4

    The video forgot to mention a US made mobile surface-to-surface hypersonic missile called "Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon" (also nicknamed as "Black Eagle").
    The first pre-production samples have already taken up combat duty with mass deployment is scheduled for around 2023

    • @nirvana3921
      @nirvana3921 Год назад +6

      First of all, you must understand that if China and Japan have a direct conflict over the Taiwan crisis or the Senkaku Islands. If Washington's attitude is not clear, it is likely to withdraw the USFJ and USFK to the second island chain from a new deployment. Because the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific was proposed as early as the Obama era. Secondly, the United States started a full-scale nuclear war without a winner for the sake of CCP for Japan. Do you think it's possible? This will affect the entire continental U.S. Plus, you know almost nothing about China's National Missile Defense (CNMD) system. Including his early warning mechanism and subregional interception mechanism. Both The Minuteman 3 are well-launched ballistic missiles of the last century. Its maneuverability is much lower than that of a launch vehicle. Of course, China also has nuclear submarines that have long cruises in the waters around the Caribbean Sea and the Aleutian Islands, and they can also launch JL-2 missiles. You also know very little about hypersonic vehicles. China has enough strategic depth to place its launchers anywhere on its mainland. The missile will break through the atmosphere into space inside China. The THAAD system is simply powerless. And after entering the atmosphere, the aircraft carried out irregular taxiing and orbit change with Qian Xuesen Ballistics. When it breaks into the atmosphere again, it will penetrate at Mach 25, and no weapon in the world can intercept it at the moment. And you should be clear that it can be launched not only land-based. It can also be carried and launched by strategic bombers H6k. This adds more variables. You also need to be clear that THAAD is deployed in South Korea to counter North Korea's ballistic missile threat. Will South Korea make an early interception for Japan during the war? After all, this will drag South Korea into the Sino-Japanese war. South Korea and Japan are not allies, and they are full of contradictions. In addition, you must be aware that the United States has not made any nuclear commitments to Japan in the U.S-Japan security treaty. Japan itself has three non-nuclear principles.

    • @user-fl8qk3xs7p
      @user-fl8qk3xs7p Год назад +1

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 9 месяцев назад

      @@nirvana3921 China has ~200 total warheads available. The US maintains ~7,000 on active duty. Trident missiles are far worse than Minuteman missiles as they carry up to eight total warheads per missile with 20 SLBMs per submarine. The bulk of the total megatonnage of US nuclear power is contained on the Trident missiles.
      The US never started a war on behalf of Japan.
      A Chinese strike, even if using all missiles and warheads, will not affect the entire continental US as China lacks a sufficient capacity of warheads of sufficient power to do so.
      The Minuteman missiles have been continuously upgraded and the presently deployed missiles are of 21st century technology, not 20th.
      The Minuteman, like any ballistic missile, is sufficiently maneuverable as its only task is to gain the proper altitude and bring the payloads into range of their targets.
      China can indeed deploy their weapons anywhere in China. The US, on the other hand, can deploy their weapons virtually anywhere in the world due to treaties, foreign bases, carrier strike groups and the constant constantly present second strike capabilities of the nuclear-armed Ohio-class submarines.
      THAAD has been tested and been effective. It's not perfect, but it's just one of three known anti-ballistic missile weapons that exist in the US and doesn't even factor in the log in deployed weapons systems becoming known to the world and the ten or twenty years before that point where the weapons are deployed without being commonly known.
      Now actively deployed US naval laser weapons can absolutely intercept re-entry vehicles and you don't seem to understand the Mach measurement as 25 isn't really a possibility for any country. That speed is 18,527.425 miles per hour. Since re-entry vehicles lack propulsion due to the complications of re-entering the atmosphere and space vehicles don't even plummet to earth at a fraction of that speed.... Well, you're wrong, basically/.
      Japan is actually covered by the US nuclear umbrella. Not in the document you mentioned, but it's kind of odd to assume only one document dictates such a complicated number of commitments, interactions and assurances.
      I envy that you're at least being paid to post this non-sense by the CCP while I'm only correcting you for free.

    • @thehairypavementant3931
      @thehairypavementant3931 6 месяцев назад

      @@user-fl8qk3xs7p

    • @Vot666
      @Vot666 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@nirvana3921he's not talking about china

  • @ashnazgthrakatulukii1165
    @ashnazgthrakatulukii1165 Год назад +2

    Avangard is not a missile, but it can be part of a missile.
    Also there are others non missiles in the list which even noted.

  • @rc3178
    @rc3178 Год назад +2

    Кроме,как у России,пока ни у кого нет гиперзвуковой ракеты.

  • @Desire123ification
    @Desire123ification Год назад +12

    21st century warfare would be dominated by speed: Light (Laser) and Kinetic (Asteroids/Comets).

    • @josephjroy6593
      @josephjroy6593 Год назад

      A comet crashing against the ground isn't warfare, it'll be a mass extinction event.

  • @justindad2240
    @justindad2240 Год назад +5

    Are you kidding AGM183-A ahead of DF17(Unpredictable trajectory(unstoppable) HPGV 2500km), in addition, FxxBxx got nowhere to takeoff or landing in pacific west, how? DF26 Guam/Carrier killer 5000km Mach18, Air launch DF17 10000+km, DF27 long range DF17, Australia/Hawaii express.

  • @karachiking92
    @karachiking92 Год назад

    Nice

  • @3w653
    @3w653 Год назад

    3.30 AGM183A 3rd test failed..... And the assistant Secretary, Andrew, of Air Force Procurement department said they plan to give up AGM183A proj and Air Force is inclined to promote the development of HACM Proj of Thor instead.

  • @ddr3629
    @ddr3629 Год назад +16

    I'm Russian but i feel proud for China and North Korea too. Iran also should have hypersonic nukes to defend themselves from Israel.

    • @jenny2329
      @jenny2329 Год назад

      What do you mean by putting China and North Korea together?

  • @stevenbaer5999
    @stevenbaer5999 Год назад +4

    The faster things are more heat it produces. What type of material does it take to go mach 20 or maybe less?

  • @alexkor380
    @alexkor380 Год назад +16

    On December 12, 2022, the US Air Force command shouted to the whole world about the "successful test of a hypersonic missile."
    They just didn’t say that the success was as follows:
    1. The missile was finally able to unhook from the B-52.
    2. The rocket flew in a straight line - the flight was uncontrolled, without guidance.
    3. The rocket accelerated to Mach 5.
    4. The missile has not yet been put into service. She now needs to be taught to fly faster and fly where you need to.

    • @nobodycares2164
      @nobodycares2164 Год назад +3

      Yep. This rocket not exist yet. But still in the list. Lol

    • @technoartfest8708
      @technoartfest8708 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@nobodycares2164 the most shocking thing is how they place Avangard ,the world first Re-entry speed missile behind most missiles in the list.
      A true list should be .
      1)Sarmat super nuke First mach 22
      2)Avangard missile second mach 27.0 missile ,This is beyond hypersonic speeds.. LOL
      3)Kinhzal missile third Mach 12
      4) Tsirkong missile four. mach 9
      5)chinese hypersonic missile
      6)from here all americans and indians experimental missiles. Mach 5.0 and under.

  • @IlaDey-pk2cs
    @IlaDey-pk2cs 10 месяцев назад

    Nice video you shared. Thank you for sharing this amazing vidio.

  • @Angel77300
    @Angel77300 Год назад

    French Missile M.51.3 .... Speed MAch25 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (10.000 km range)

  • @fqeagles21
    @fqeagles21 Год назад +13

    Minuteman strenght Is Speed and Precision

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Год назад +8

      Not really, Many missiles are faster, or just as fast, Russian Sarmat, Stiletto and R-36, Indian Agni, Chinese DF-41 or France M41, They are faster, and CEP, well, Miutman 3 have a cep of 250 Meter, that is ok, Agni 10m, DF-41 100m, R-36 600m, Stiletto 300m, and what do that mean, that all missiles kill their target

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 Год назад +1

      They're being replaced. Plus, they were just recently upgraded. Where it goes nobody knows!

    • @kamalchandramoney3541
      @kamalchandramoney3541 Год назад +1

      Minuteman carries only 3 warheads and is over 50 years old . The trident is the most dreaded missile in U.s arsenal

    • @fqeagles21
      @fqeagles21 Год назад

      @@kamalchandramoney3541 i know, but i wasn't talking about SLBM,only land based

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Год назад

      @@MrCastodian although India agni is definitely not 10 m CEP, the CEP is irrelevant in nuclear ICBM , it blast will always cover

  • @cidop3427
    @cidop3427 Год назад +11

    The buzz ☕☕☕☕😂😂😂🤣

  • @yukisuzuki9468
    @yukisuzuki9468 Год назад +1

    US,China,Russia….big boys‘ game

  • @Grizathvili
    @Grizathvili Год назад +1

    There are still Peresvet, Bulava, and others, which are not on this list.

  • @patatebanine4278
    @patatebanine4278 Год назад +5

    the WZ-8 Chinese looks alot like the Lockheed D-21.

    • @milkycatmeowmeow9302
      @milkycatmeowmeow9302 Год назад +7

      Chinese... Copy everything

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Год назад +14

      Why copy a faild US drone? They made 4 operational flights with D-21, all crashed, 1 in Sovjetunion, 1 in China and 2 over the sea :p

    • @user-vo1qi1nx4p
      @user-vo1qi1nx4p Год назад +11

      眼睛不需要可以捐给有需要的人😅

    • @user-ql2jo7su9s
      @user-ql2jo7su9s Год назад

      @@milkycatmeowmeow9302 Yes,you can believe that China has stolen the time machine from future America

    • @milkycatmeowmeow9302
      @milkycatmeowmeow9302 Год назад

      @@user-ql2jo7su9s yes i can

  • @peacemusiclove1377
    @peacemusiclove1377 Год назад +3

    There's no mention of Brahmos, Agni

    • @puravidavlog5831
      @puravidavlog5831 Год назад +1

      B'coz, this post is mainly from Chinese paid media 😂

    • @Xrginld17X
      @Xrginld17X 6 месяцев назад

      Because India got its ass fucked in war with CHina in 1962, so sdtfu ad talk less and worlk harder n smareter. jahahaha @@puravidavlog5831

  • @golonawailus4312
    @golonawailus4312 Год назад

    WZ 8 is theoretically an unmanned vehicle

  • @agenthunk3491
    @agenthunk3491 Год назад +2

    Mach 27… godly

  • @djordjetodorovic4176
    @djordjetodorovic4176 Год назад +16

    3 KINZHALS????
    DAMN THERE ARE TENS OF VIDEOS OF DIFFERENT LOUNCHINGS OF THAT ROCKET

    • @ohmygoalspain8581
      @ohmygoalspain8581 Год назад +5

      Russia used only 1 kinzal

    • @romanberkutov2592
      @romanberkutov2592 Год назад

      @@ohmygoalspain8581 2

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 9 месяцев назад

      @@ohmygoalspain8581 Says here they've used at least six against Ukraine and one of them was successfully intercepted by the Patriot system.

  • @ohmygoalspain8581
    @ohmygoalspain8581 Год назад +4

    why is sarmat not on the list?

    • @pavelslutsky3114
      @pavelslutsky3114 Год назад

      Слишком страшен, чтоб даже говорить о нем.

  • @user-kt2eg4oi3m
    @user-kt2eg4oi3m Месяц назад

    You forgot the french M51, flying at Mach 15 to 10.000 km with 100 kilotons power.

  • @ajinkyagaikwad26
    @ajinkyagaikwad26 Год назад +1

    AGM-183 ARRW failed recently in a test & USAF will cancel this Lockheed Martin's Hypersonic missile program to focus on other

  • @dad-ms8mz
    @dad-ms8mz Год назад +10

    Happy to seee as always.
    Many Indian Messiles above mach 24+ Plus in terminal phase are not present in the list.😅

    • @tapiomith9403
      @tapiomith9403 9 месяцев назад +1

      Bhutan have mach 70++plus missile in testing phase .that too is also not maintained 😂😂

    • @stevestarnes9198
      @stevestarnes9198 8 месяцев назад +5

      iNDIA SHOULD MAYBE PROVIDE ITS CITIZENS WITH TOILETS FIRST ..lol

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz 8 месяцев назад

      @@stevestarnes9198 I seee someone's ass is burning 🤣..
      Probably Whose Kid takes gun In school and have hard time Distinguishing between male and female 🤣

    • @abcejeh3774
      @abcejeh3774 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@stevestarnes9198 We have enough toilets but after reading your comment I don't think we need our toilet because your mouth is always there .

    • @Xrginld17X
      @Xrginld17X 6 месяцев назад

      @@abcejeh3774 Don tworry, he enemy will fill the lad with cows. Chck mate India, you're worth nothing infron of your mata coes. LMFAO

  • @XkMeng
    @XkMeng Год назад +5

    Although the agm183 has passed the PPT stage, the test has hardly been successful, and it has never flown above Mach 5

  • @islandon22
    @islandon22 Год назад

    Mutual annihilation is such a fun topic.

  • @madunmadun873
    @madunmadun873 Год назад +1

    Bagus sekali teruslah kalian saling berlomba lomba membuat senjata canggih lalu gunakan dalam perang sesungguhnya untuk mengukur keberhasilan dan kualitas.setelah kalian sukses percayalah senjata buatan anda akan laris terjual diseluruh dunia.

  • @georgecoons6872
    @georgecoons6872 Год назад +3

    Well now what the u.s. military can do is turn the old F-104 starfighter into a a flying maneuverable missile.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 Год назад +4

    Whatever became of the "Midget Man"? Single warhead missile. The whole thing about hypersonics is they have to survive reentry like speeds and still be able to navigate. Not an easy ability to sustain over long distances. I haven't seen any performance more impressive than other missiles so far.

    • @vonnegutshot
      @vonnegutshot Год назад

      The midgetman never made it past the prototype stage of development... The program was scrapped in 1992 right after the cold war ended in 91. Tactical nukes like the midge are frightening. A nuke fired out of a pickup truck is definitely scary. BTW check out the Orion Pegasus missile in regards to midgetman esque performance.

    • @albertmedel4168
      @albertmedel4168 7 месяцев назад

      "Scrapped" 😉

  • @Walnut777
    @Walnut777 6 месяцев назад

    Wait till they come up with a “ludicrous” speed missile😂

  • @littlepeng6668
    @littlepeng6668 6 месяцев назад

    The United States has always lagged behind in terms of hypersonic missiles.

  • @jerrybell7934
    @jerrybell7934 Год назад +10

    Great respect from China.

    • @deveryhenderson8335
      @deveryhenderson8335 Год назад +2

      Ling ling on RUclips? Ling ling not allowed on RUclips

    • @jerrybell7934
      @jerrybell7934 Год назад +8

      @@deveryhenderson8335 Well, trolls also not allowed on RUclips.

    • @Dreadwolf3155
      @Dreadwolf3155 Год назад

      @@jerrybell7934 scary if you believe all this Chinese stuff is actually real. We have of course to assume it is and plan accordingly.

    • @jerrybell7934
      @jerrybell7934 Год назад +6

      @hyper Hatred and resentment can't solve any problem for your country. In China, there's few media or channel provoking anti-this or anti-that anger. But if you are hostile, then don't expect any respect.

  • @avramisnegirev1827
    @avramisnegirev1827 4 месяца назад

    Chinese spy balloon: "Left The Chat"

  • @umu8934
    @umu8934 Год назад +7

    Nuclear countries should start making orbital station with nuclear weapons or tungsten poles that can be drop(rods of gods)

    • @bayanzabihiyan7465
      @bayanzabihiyan7465 Год назад +2

      So many reason why this wouldn't work, but the most notable. 1. It's VERY hard to get anything to space, let alone something that heavy and expensive, (putting a nuke on a rocket that may or may not fail is very reckless too) 2. Satellites are typically unpowered and have predictable orbits and not very maneuverable, hence you really wouldn't have a lot of options as to when or even where you wanted to strike.

  • @xwqi
    @xwqi 6 месяцев назад +1

    It is said that Russia has more than three kinds of hypersonic missiles in the sea, land and air, while China currently only has hypersonic missiles in the army. It seems that the United States is still in the testing phase.

    • @bentony7548
      @bentony7548 6 месяцев назад

      well,have to correct your comments that China had these 3 kinds,,3 ways to launch a hypersonic missiles..
      055 is the ship platform.H6 for airborne. DF17/27 for the land...it just like the f35A/B/C,

    • @user-gc6om4ov8e
      @user-gc6om4ov8e 6 месяцев назад

      @@bentony7548 不不不,中国什么都没有,所谓DF系列都是假的,3D动画和模型而已。我们只有一种叫做炮仗的东西是重大节日庆祝用的。

    • @user-ux5ir7uf2e
      @user-ux5ir7uf2e 6 месяцев назад

      keep believing ur words

  • @mehranaliyari9866
    @mehranaliyari9866 Год назад

    I just don't know why the Iranian Khyber Breaker was not among these missiles, while it has a speed of Mach 18

    • @AliHuffman
      @AliHuffman 10 месяцев назад +1

      All intercontinental ballistic missiles and even shuttles and the Apollo module have hypersonic speeds in the terminal phase, but this does not mean they are hypersonic at low altitude. A hypersonic missile is a missile that can glide the final stage at a low altitude or fly with scramjet engines(maneuverable)
      For example the Shuttle in terminal phase has about 30 _40 mach.

    • @mehranaliyari9866
      @mehranaliyari9866 10 месяцев назад

      @@AliHuffman With a slight change, the Iranian Khyber Shakan can be one of the hypersonic missiles, but why was Fattah not among these missiles?

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 9 месяцев назад

      Hypersonic weapons have existed since the 1950s. A modern hypersonic aircraft or missile is differentiated based on whether or not they are able to maneuver when at those speeds. So far there are none that have been down to do so.

  • @user-uq8yy1mp3d
    @user-uq8yy1mp3d Год назад +8

    RS-28 «Sarmat»???

  • @alxelin9546
    @alxelin9546 Год назад +3

    没有巨浪3,东风41😂😂😂😂

  • @alexsandertroposci1631
    @alexsandertroposci1631 Год назад +2

    @The Buzz
    It is pronounced "Sheeng Kóhng', not "ZjeenKōhng". I actually speak Chinese. Five dialects in fact

    • @kimpoho9064
      @kimpoho9064 Год назад

      "ZING"is Cantonese 星.....

    • @Chillerll
      @Chillerll Год назад

      Here is a little star for your language skills ⭐

  • @armantape
    @armantape Год назад

    America failed / could not develop a hypersonic missile, then formed an aukus

  • @PavelMyth
    @PavelMyth Год назад +3

    From the very first words, a propaganda lie!
    In the first months of the SVO (special military operation), only military facilities, military equipment and military units were subjected to missile strikes. Ukrainian servicemen who were not members of neo-Nazi battalions and organizations were asked to lay down their arms and those who wished could continue to serve in the Russian army.
    But, during the 8 years of the civil war in the Donbass, when the Ukrainian military shelled the peaceful city of Donetsk, with the help of propaganda, neo-Nazism deeply penetrated the Ukrainian totalitarian society. This predetermined the fate of Ukraine as a state.
    But, it's even worse than you think. The NATO war machine is working for Ukraine in the war against Russia. That is, NATO is still unofficially, but fighting against Russia with the hands of Ukrainians. Although not only Ukrainians. For example, ask how many Polish soldiers died in Ukraine? Poland's interest is understandable, they want to seize and annex Western Ukraine and Belarus to Poland.
    The problem is that after the NATO countries are recognized as participants in the conflict, a big war will begin, which will inevitably become nuclear and lead to the death of mankind. The combined stockpile of nuclear weapons would be enough to destroy humanity. There will be no winners.

  • @vimalkumar3815
    @vimalkumar3815 Год назад +8

    No problem... What ever you made it😁... Vietnam is best example... What happened in Afghanistan.. All these toys failed... Latest is Ukraine... Technological advances no matters?.. It is human skill.

    • @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365
      @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 Год назад +2

      True 👍👍👍 Best comment so far 👍👍👍

    • @Booz2020
      @Booz2020 Год назад

      Talibans,. Hezbollahs, and Hamas members love driving TOYOTA Trucks 🗾🎌🇯🇵👀

    • @winstonchurchill5892
      @winstonchurchill5892 Год назад

      Ah yes the famous hypersonic missiles in Vietnam...

  • @sharad99088
    @sharad99088 21 день назад

    comparing ballistic with cruise missiles does not make any sense

  • @skanthaadsigns
    @skanthaadsigns 6 месяцев назад

    “Civilian Targets”…..hello?!

  • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
    @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Год назад +40

    Only Western countries show full test results of their equipment. Russia claims 100% success for its missiles even during testing and development.

    • @romankovalev7894
      @romankovalev7894 Год назад

      Oh really? In Russia, hypersonic weapons have been PRODUCED since 2017. The West has not yet completed the tests, someone there said something that they had successfully launched. No launches are shown, the rocket in motion was also not shown. But computer graphics were drawn. And already included in the list. This says that you are at least a liar and things are exactly the opposite of what you wrote.

    • @Booz2020
      @Booz2020 Год назад

      What's Up with Hypersonic Missiles of Dong Feng Family 🇨🇳❓

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Год назад

      @Reverend Boaz You have to trust a country that just claimed a gain of 3% GDP growth after its economy completely fell apart.

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Год назад +12

      The United States conducted a total of 24+ publicly disclosed hypersonic missile tests between April 2010 and Dec 2022. Of those 24 tests, 12 were deemed successful most recently, with three partial successes, and eight total failures in the beginning. We know this because the US makes all its data public information. The tax payers have a right to know how their money is being spent. Meanwhile, the USA has launched 28 infrared hypersonic missile tracking satellites for a fully operational system unique to the world. The Russian Kinzhal missile is simply an ICBM (iskander) with heat shields added to its reentry payload. It does not have a scramjet engine. It's accuracy is not extremely precise and can only hit stationary targets. THAAD would have no problem taking out a Kinzhal if it was defending within 40 miles of the Kinzhal target. The US is developing scramjet engines for all its hypersonic weapons. Let that sink in. The only reason the US wants a HGV "hypersonic glide vehicle" is to put them on F15'EX's flying 1500 miles away to strike within minutes. Compared to its JASSM's which have never been intercepted when flying over S400 systems in Syria (2018 chemical weapons facility hits 17/17) that o ly cost us 2-3 million a shot. Versus a hypersonic missile at 20-100 million per shot.

    • @romankovalev7894
      @romankovalev7894 Год назад +5

      @@MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      Did they show a flying rocket? No. Have you hit at least one target? No. Well, don't fart here. Yes, the United States did a bunch of tests. Separately, the components fly with hypersound - not assembled. Achieving speed is not the most important thing, dude - it is no less difficult to control a rocket at such a speed. Iskander ... This is nonsense that you write every time. The Porsche is made on the body of the Volkswagen Beetle family car. Have you seen the characteristics of Iskander? Speed ​​2 M and range 500 km. Kinzhal has 12M and 2500 km. Iskander has one feature - he makes an anti-missile maneuver. It was very convenient not to invent something new, but to take what is. Well, what can you say about Zhirkon? Also an Iskander? 😂😂😂 Even your experts recognize the lag

  • @danielkuleshov5876
    @danielkuleshov5876 Год назад +15

    also this channel "india will be next superpower"

    • @gattlinggun9881
      @gattlinggun9881 Год назад +2

      IND!A IT'S SUPPER P0PPER!!!
      😂🤣🤣🤭🤭🤭

    • @Maratha382
      @Maratha382 Год назад +1

      @@gattlinggun9881 😂😂

    • @ritamsarma9568
      @ritamsarma9568 Год назад +2

      @@gattlinggun9881 and Pakistan is super bhikhari

  • @Kolmi140
    @Kolmi140 6 месяцев назад +2

    В России🇷🇺 всегда были и есть👉 умные👌 инженеры💪 которые мыслят👍 не так как другие и этим👉 мы 🇷🇺отличаемся умом и сообразительностью😂🇷🇺👌💪👍🤣

  • @alexsandertroposci1631
    @alexsandertroposci1631 Год назад

    @The Buzz
    It is pronounced "Dōhng Fúhng", not "DōhngFayng". I actually speak Chinese. Five dialects in fact.

  • @Petozzi
    @Petozzi Год назад +38

    Slava russia!

  • @user-ys1pd2nk1i
    @user-ys1pd2nk1i Год назад +3

    X 32? Iskander? Sarmat? Onyx? Jars? USA propaganda

  • @_KPA_
    @_KPA_ 7 месяцев назад

    DPRK allready has Hwasong-17 and Hwasong-18

  • @vicat555vick7
    @vicat555vick7 11 месяцев назад

    500 kilotons is not a weight, it is a yield. Thanks!

  • @user-ys1pd2nk1i
    @user-ys1pd2nk1i Год назад +3

    Kinzal 14800 km h 3000 km

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 9 месяцев назад

      And already shown to be vulnerable to the existing Patriot missile system.

    • @user-ys1pd2nk1i
      @user-ys1pd2nk1i 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@nochannel1q2321да три дивизиона патриот были уничтожены)))) это западные фантазии! Патриот ни разу не сбил ракеты Скад! Сказочник!

  • @bkjworld
    @bkjworld Год назад +4

    Agni 5 speed is mach 24

  • @ericb7776
    @ericb7776 6 месяцев назад

    Don't understand how countries know so much about each other's weapons.

    • @gutsky
      @gutsky 4 месяца назад +2

      Because they don't,all these things are way behind the real military weapon tech.

  • @chewwaileong8199
    @chewwaileong8199 6 месяцев назад

    By understand how powerful a hydrogen bomb compare to normal atomic bomb, all this missile are just a transporter for the deadly war head , the war head is the terrifying part.

  • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
    @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Год назад +4

    Top speeds of missiles is subjective to altitude. 10,000mph where there is no friction in the atmosphere is very different than 10,000mph at sea level 14.4psi/ 1 bar of atmosphere.

    • @nedeljkoostojic5222
      @nedeljkoostojic5222 Год назад

      These is true.But.
      Sarmat have speed in the exite to the earth atmosfer about max32 and then he turn into flying and burning ball with speed about 27max.No one media will tel as the true.

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Год назад +1

      Those missiles launch straight up. They don't reach high speeds until they are significantly above the atmospheric pressures found at sea level. Rockets face 3 forms of pressure. Gravity, thrust, and atmospheric drag. When all 3 of these are at their most is called max Q. The only way these rockets reach hypersonic speeds is when atmospheric drag and gravity have been severely negated. They would never reach hypersonic speeds without it. Scramjet engines seek to change that for long-duration flights at low altitudes. This is why America appears behind in "hypersonic" weapons. They aren't just putting wings and heatshields on a ICBM. They are developing a new form of propulsion.

    • @user-xs2ru9on4s
      @user-xs2ru9on4s Год назад

      Единственный, кто её применил- это Россия, остальное это китайские выдумки, и воровство китайцами технологий!

    • @alexevdokimov9615
      @alexevdokimov9615 Год назад

      lovedurmom is Elon Musk with girl hair. ha ha too funny.

    • @alexevdokimov9615
      @alexevdokimov9615 Год назад

      are you Elon Musk,s sister?

  • @chriswatt859
    @chriswatt859 Год назад +3

    The kinzhal is meant to avoid air defenses but has been shot down numerous times

  • @FTFSupremacyROBLOX
    @FTFSupremacyROBLOX 11 месяцев назад

    Screw zodiac signs, what cruise missile are you?

  • @teckmenglee8060
    @teckmenglee8060 6 месяцев назад +1

    What about the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile by the Russian?

  • @korencek
    @korencek 6 месяцев назад +6

    Russia fired at least 5 kinzhals. 2 were captured on camera early. 2 were seen when exploding at patriot missile launch site. 1 was seen in crimea where pilot failed to arm the missile and fell on the field. 0 kinzhals were intercepted.

  • @patrikjakobsen2142
    @patrikjakobsen2142 Год назад +4

    Well i live in the west and the missile im most afraid of is a fucking avanguard, that missile is sick. Sarmat-2 is a strong second because of the massive payload it can carry

    • @harshshree4354
      @harshshree4354 Год назад +1

      then Russian will fulfill your dream one day they will hit one on your city

    • @patrikjakobsen2142
      @patrikjakobsen2142 Год назад

      @@harshshree4354 There live under 1k people in my city so not really, but nice try

    • @OCIPALA-NATURE
      @OCIPALA-NATURE Год назад

      @@patrikjakobsen2142 dont forgot TSAR BOMBA lmao

    • @patrikjakobsen2142
      @patrikjakobsen2142 Год назад +1

      @@OCIPALA-NATURE Not really that has to be dropped from a bomber and no one does that anymore its to ineffective. Easier, faster and more secure to just shoot a ballistic missile

    • @user-gq5lv1tg1d
      @user-gq5lv1tg1d Год назад

      @@patrikjakobsen2142 а ещё у нас есть Посейдон.

  • @WwarpfirewW
    @WwarpfirewW Год назад +4

    Wtf where you get that info on kinzhal? From some shady indian website?

  • @inseiin
    @inseiin Месяц назад

    If the chinese would carry a bomb weighing 500kilo tons as you are saying...it would never even get off the ground....the talk here is about yield!