@@rainkode8795lol obviously not bro Isreal used aircraft to attack iran not ibcm or land luanched missle And yet air ti surface missles still passed and hit targets so it not even close
@@RealInosuke lala land mate. It was 80% shot down with the help of Allies, not Israel. Israel wouldn't last one day without US and G7 support. Economically and militarily. Yes, US is no doubt a formidable power, and it is destruction for most of the countries if you are being opposed by them. But come on mate! Israelis probably shot 80% of the debris that was falling after being shot by the Americans
Well Iran Repelled ISRAELI attack with Russian and locally made Air defence systems and unlike Israeli n American air defence systems their shields were actually able to defend Iranian air space.
There was clearly a lot of uneducated people in these comments, the Iron Dome is a very effective system, one of the best in the world in fact, but it isnt designed to counter ballistic missiles, its like being mad at an F1 car for having no luggage space.
Remember, the God of Israel never forsakes His people, nor does He deliver them into the hands of their enemies. This is why Israel emerges victorious in every war.
@@IsraelMilitaryChannelare you comparing Israel military power to Gaza and Lebanon?😂 What a loser. Why don't you try full scale attack against Turkiye or Iran. And let see how iron dome would fare against their counter attack.
You are simply ignorant. Iron dome's role: interception of rockets, mortars, and drones. Name me another system which does better than the iron dome in these roles. You can't.
Yes thats exactly what I said Shooting down cheap short range missiles not advanced tactical BM And aircrafts Its not capable of holding number 10 @@IsraelMilitaryChannel
@@sasuke4231 The Iron Dome is a C-RAM and V-SHORAD system not a SAM system. It is specifically designed to protect military installations and assets from incoming rocket, artillery, and mortar threats. It is the most combat tested C-Ram in the world. Name me another C-Ram that is more successful. Why do you place laughing emojis? It makes it obvious that you have no clue what you're talking about.
@@sasuke4231 The Iron Dome is a C-RAM/V-SHORAD system not a SAM system. It is specifically designed to protect military installations and assets from incoming rocket, artillery, and mortar threats. The Iron Dome is the most combat test C-RAM/V-SHORAD in the world. Your emojis implies you don't know what you are talking about.
The Patriot and the Iron Dome are advanced systems, are you joking? There are plenty videos where we can see that Patriot in Ukraine actually couldn't even protect itself.
@@frederiklindegaard8400yes is has! 🤡👌🤣🤣🤣 western weapons are just expensive junk! That are just getting put to the test and failing miserably while Russian weapons continues to defeat the US around the world.
@@frederiklindegaard8400 And the Patriot can't shoot down one Iskander lol. To let the S-400 ATACMS through, Ukraine produces 6 at a time and shoots down about 4-5 of them, which is already not bad, of course no air defense can cope with a large number of ballistic targets, the Iskander is better than the American and even with one launch, it is extremely difficult for the Ukrainian air defense and its PATRIOT
@@frederiklindegaard8400 Come on, smart guy, tell me why when there were cruise missile attacks on the Pivdenne (Yuzhmash) plant, Patriot shot them down but missed one missile from iskander-k in the form of 9M728, while when launching a ballistic missile, one missile easily passed and hit the hangar of this plant. Let's not forget to add the strikes on airfields in central Ukraine and the strike on the Poltava Military Communications Academy.
The S-500's anti-ballistic missiles were created on the basis of the missiles that were created for the S-300VM, in turn, this system coped well against SRBM and will probably also show itself well in improvements when inserted into the new air defense system.
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel At least it can stop the Russian Iskander in theory with a higher chance than the Patriot and S-400 system, since its missile is designed for such purposes. The S-400/Patriot missiles are designed more to intercept horizontally flying targets, they can intercept ballistic missiles with a partial chance.
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel The ARROW-3 is designed more for larger ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads and it flies much further, and the S-300VM system is against SRBMs. DCS has shown that this system intercepts ballistic missiles better than other long-range SAMs like the S-400 and Patriot, its missile was designed for this task.
Seriously if Russian air defenses did not work then a big part of Russia including parts of Moscow would be a burning hell these days looking at the frequency of Ukrainian attacks throughout the armed conflict. Almost all of them do get intercepted by Rus defenses being unbiased. But on the other hand Ukr isn't being as successful even though they also shoots down many of the drones coming from Rus side but not nearly as successful.
When it comes to ranking air defence systems, it would probably be best to split them into categories based on the class and type such as short or long range and exoatmospheric because then its an apples to apples comparisons.
S-300V4 is really impressive! I also read in Military Watch about the world air defense record, S-300V4 shot down MiG-29 at 234 km during Ukrainian counteroffensive in 2023.
@@vanhelsing5469 Pantsir S1 missiles are designed to destroy short-range aerodynamic targets, but in summer it managed to shoot down ATACMS missile, and in 2022, soviet Tochka-U.
@@vanhelsing5469😂 it's not fake it's an anti ballistic missile interceptor that's why it's ridiculously fast and still undergoing testing. Because ballistic missiles can reach up to mach 20 you need something fast to hit it.
All defence system will fail in fight against truth 😂😂😂 . Good going RESISTANCE ARMY 💪 keep it up 👍 Majority of world peoples stands with truth, oppressed and justice
For Israel to defend their country without any maximum damage against 200 ballistic missiles, is evidence that they have a strong air defense. But do you think that Iran will stand a chance? I doubt which is why they're on a diplomatic talks with regional leaders. Iran assets are vulnerable for attacks without any protection from IDF attack.
@@TLC-v5ySeriously... do you believe this lazy propaganda? If it is true, then why until now has Israel not responded even after talking so much? I tell you, it's because the toy anti-aircraft defenses that Israel had were pulverized by Iran, and they are trying to rebuild with the massive support of the USA. Believe me friend, Israel is no longer the dominant power in the region, it is no match for the Persians.
The BEST of them should the Pantsir S1, it can kill anything, from drones to hypersonic missiles. Ukraine hasn't been able to struck and destroy none of them lately even with HIMARS, Storm Shadows, ATACMS etc...especially, the latest version.
Israel: saying June 2024 Ukraine claimed the S-500 had been deployed to the Crimean peninsula to defend the Kerch Bridge. In its operational debut in Ukraine, the S-500 proved unsuccessful in defending against Ukrainian launched MGM-140 ATACMS missiles. Russia: why? Israel: saying Russia high technology advanced very very lower 0.01% no match for Western Storm missile, ATAMCS, GLSDB..
Bullshit! Don't believe in Ukraine, are just lying. Nearly all ATACMS and Strom Shadows towards Krim are intercepted. Russian S-Series are worlds 's best air defense systems. S-500 ist no yet operational, but S-400 is used. It's rockets are more far reaching as any other system.
S400s and s500s have proved their inability in Ukraine, they succumbed to an atacms missile, a missile made in the 1980s. And they are not great against missiles specifically with cluster warheads.
Do you think someone using Multi-millions of dollars S-400 or S-500 missiles to destroy a few thousand dollars drone or missiles that hit inside Ukraine or some useless area, which totally have no importance to defend in first place ?? You do not need to destroy every projectile that comes to you. You need to calculate the risk-cost-benefit ratio & then let it hit the target. Repairing cost is way more cheaper than destroying it in the sky. Not everyone got a blank check like Israel.
Another liar writes nonsense that the S-500 was tested in Ukraine. There is no fact anywhere that it was used, just as they write nonsense about it being hit by a missile lol. Officially, there is only one sample of this installation that is still being tested, and it does not protect anything yet lol. As for what you write about ballistic missiles, look for yourself - the Yuzhmash Patriot cannot fully protect against ballistic missiles, as well as other buildings in central Ukraine and airfields. If you open the air defenses that are there, Russia can quite easily destroy them too, but it is clear that ballistic missiles are a difficult target. And Israel was also not thrilled with the Patriot after trying to repel Iranian ballistic missiles last time (not on October 1).
Yeah, because it feared the most, to get attacked😂 other countries like usa dosen't care about defense system that much, cause nobody is stupid enough to lunch an attack on us soil!
it's time for the entire world to speak the truth. we have all seen what is happening in our own eyes in Europe. Russia have the best air defense system in the entire world .not by propaganda as the others do. patriot air defense system is just like a toys 🎉. all weapons are now in use in Ukraine. Abraham tanks was a game changer. Himars air defense system was a game changer. patriot air defense system was a game changer. (F 16) fighter jet was a game changer. all this America weapons are made for video games only. 🎮. meanwhile Russia has proven to the entire world that no one else can stand Russian alone face to face in any form of war. Russia war machines will burn you down to achis
The Israeli defence system have flopped against non-state operatives, therefore, it is doubtful whether it can withstand onslaughts of powerful states.
Russian and terrorist trolls be like “Israeli air defenses aren’t shit, they let at least a dozen out of 180 “hypersonic(by Iranian standards)” missiles through that hit some desert & some runways” meanwhile Russia with their S-400’s and S-500’s and Pansirs and everything else cant stop a few drones from blowing up their main arsenal 😂
I am a Russian speaker and I have not seen any trolls here who are against Israel. Here, on the contrary, the trolls are idiots from English-speaking countries who write how good the Patriot is when it misses ballistic missiles, just as they write about the Russian system, forgetting about the failures of their own systems. So I don't understand the meaning of your letter and where did you see a Russian troll here? I personally said that the Iron Dome is effective because it has enough characteristics to intercept Hamas missiles that do not have supersonic speed and are made of pipes, here, of course, everything will be ok.
Let me refresh your memory - currently no long-range system can see small and plastic drones, so they must be covered by other short-range air defense systems that can detect targets at lower altitudes.
Israel's territory is very small and easy to defend, and militants's missiles are slow and low-tech. I don't need to remind you about the giant US oil refinery in Saudi Arabia in 2019. To protect it, US installed several Skyguard and Patriot missile systems, and as resul - US air defense didn't see Iranian drone that hit the refinery, reducing global oil production by 5%. US was unable to protect the small facility, karl! Russian ads protects thousands kilometers of border and shoot down everything they have missiles for. Not S-400, but S-300V4 is their most technologically advanced weapon. S-300V4 holds world record for detection and shootdown range ( S-300V4 shot down MiG-29 in 2023 at 234 km distance during ukrainian offensive). Military Watch wrote about this.
The point is that the enemy is firing too many missiles which is difficult for any air defence system to intercept. Hence we see failures for Iron dome, Patriots and S-400 systems.
@@marshalljulie3676 There could be many reasons for this: 1. Saturation attack. 2. Insufficient air defense launchers or interceptors. 3. 85-90% interception rate. 4. Missile is ignored and allowed to land because projected to hit non populated area. That being said Iran is 30 years behind Israel in air defense technology. Can Iran hit a single ballistic missile?
@@nazipunmukti8981 Iran has a 1960s air force, Israel is 50 years ahead of Iran's air force. Israel is 20 years ahead of Iran's drone technology, Israel is 20 years ahead of Iran's missile technology. Israel is 30 years ahead of Iran in air defense technology.
@@BK-wt1lc Judging by the attack on the giant American oil refinery in Saudi Arabia in 2019, it can't even shoot down an Iranian drone. To protect it, the US installed several Skyguard and Patriot missile systems, and as a result, the US air defense did not detect the Iranian drone that hit the plant, reducing global oil production by 5%. Patriot and Skyguard couldn't protect a small facility, but Russian ones protect thousands km of border and shoot down everything they have missiles for.
Turkish Air Defence System Siper has a interception range of 200 km and within only 2 years that's gonna increase to 600 km the Early Warning Radar System ALP-300G gonna have a instrumented range of 800 km
Iron Dome is the most combat tested air defense system in the world. In regards to its role and successful interception rate, there is no other system with the same role that comes close period.
Ukraine have found a way through the S300 and 400 due to low capacity and slow reload. Its also stupid expensive making deployment limited. The only systems actually battle tested with success is the patriot and the three israeli systems
@@hobby2621 And all it took back was a lifetime of budget, and complete annihilation. 5000 rockets : One time show. Meanwhile; Haniyeh, Nasarallah and Prez. Raisi in his 'Eli Copter'
@@hobby2621 there was video confirmation of exosphere intercepts, to date Israel is the only nation with multiple intercepts at that distance from the earths surface.
😂😂bruh come on it's been 3 years they are battle tested even than iron dome and patriot. They shot down stealthy cruise missiles with the new pentsir s the s300 is used to attack ground targets mostly the s400 shot down most of Ukraines bombers and su-27. There's no reason to lie this is public information you just have to read a lot.
LMAO! This is the problem that I have with @The Buzz, they place the S-300, S-400, and S-500 over the US made Patriot when in reality the Patriot system is batter and more effective (only know system to have shot down hypersonic missiles in combat) and they placed both the S-400 and the S-500 highter than the THAAD...even when the S-300, S-400, and S-500 have failed to destroy simple HIMARS ballistic missile. In fact all three have been victims of the HIMARS. Patriots & THAAD radar, sensors, and tracking outclass any Russian system.
Your problem is that The Buzz is not a political propaganda channel. Every day we hear Zelenski crying. Ukrainians complain the most. There is not a single independent confirmation of anything that happens in Ukraine.
Why are ANY of the Russian S systems even in this list??? The 1 and only S-500 system ever deployed in an active war zone didn't even last 2 weeks before being blown away LMAO
больше слушай пропаганду сша. дада и гиперзвук и все, а на деле сидит в засаде , и по сигналу авакс которого нельзя сбивать на секунду появляется и из засады чтото убивает. химарсы сбивают постоянно, и с-400 на это никто не тратит.
First of all, the Iron Doom is not against air systems, because it cannot shoot down targets that have a variable trajectory. Second, you don't have a single Chinese system, and they are very advanced and excellent!
@@slobodanstojanovic5521 china doesnt make anything good. They are just copies of russian tech on a cheap scale. Read about Bangladesh and Pakistan and the problems they have had with the J8 and exploding tank barrels. China also uses high powered RF radar which is noisy and easy to track because they lack AESA capability. China makes junk
How can a system that has not seen combat be your number 1. How do you guys rate these systems. The best are combat proven systems, not what is written in brochures.
Arrow-3 is more intended for MRBS than all types of ballistic missiles, although Israel initially wanted to make it as an interceptor of nuclear warheads, but still has not worked out. Meanwhile, Russia has long had a system for intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles in the form of A-135 and A-235, which also shoot down missiles in space, but fly further in theory. And those systems that are on the list can most likely mainly only shoot down MRBS, including the Israeli one.
lol there is literally a video of the S400 launching interceptors at incoming ATACMS that fail to intercept their target, and then the S400 is obliterated by the incoming ATACMS
such lists should AT LEAST be devided for troops (army) aa (including on march) and object stationary aa. and if you went into anti-missile terretory where a-135 / a-235 and whatever US strategic missile defense called?
Iron dome in not design to destroy balistic missiles. Get your fact straight. That goes to the arrow air defence. But its expensive and israel have few arrows. Iran fired 440 balistic misiles. Usa interceptepted 12 , some fell in iran. The rest was intercepted by the arrow. Over 50 made impact. Which is not bad. But remember this is the largest balistic missil attac in all of history. 50 is still impresive. But iran only have 5000 balistuc missiles. Meaning only 200 can actuatly impact israel.
how do you know you understand david sling proved its failure why do you think david sling is the only interceptor israel fired??180 missile launched only 10-12 hits on military targets some of them landed in remote village or deserts.Why would the fire a missilion dollar interceptor when they found that the missile is going to land on low risk side.Missile defence is a tough topic than what media tells.
No they are actually successful but the problem was Iranians have fired over 240 supersonic ballistic missiles. Iron dome is not soo effective to bring them down compared to Arrow 3 and david sling. 240 supersonic ballistic missiles overwhelmed them cuz there have never been this much of firing ballistic missiles together at once in world history.
A good system, but it is not capable of intercepting ballistic missiles and simple supersonic missiles. Even these indicators are enough for Israel, considering that militants often make missiles from water pipes and which do not fly so fast, this system also copes with drones.
@@isadanjan4762 you know the problem? Those pipe rockets cost almost 0$, even those pipes are donated by the EU, while iron dome missiles cost millions and are manufactured at the US. Israel have run out of those missiles and are spending billions to buy new ones.
@@aligator2150 The Iron Dome itself still intercepts 90% of Hamas' subsonic missiles, which has been demonstrated more than once, so in this case, given what non-modern means (except Iran) Israel's opponents have, this interception system is enough for them for now. Israel has made its own systems for other purposes.
The world has seen how bad Russian air defence is ... its comical that you have them no.1&2 🤣🤣 ...The ONLY S500 system Russia had was obliterated by a 30 year old NATO missile !
Cool, Patriot couldn't shoot down "Kinzhal" over the airfield in Khmelnytsky region, as well as let cruise missiles fly to Lviv through, there was a strike there recently too. By the way, if you don't know, S-500 is still in the testing stage, it is not used as the main air defense and there is only one model. What Ukraine says is also military censorship nonsense, there is no fact of use yet.👍
I will also add by the way that the attack was on Poltava, where the Swedish instructors were located, the Iskander missiles passed through the Ukrainian air defense without any problems and accurately hit the building twice.
You're an idiot Russia has the only AD platform that can intercept hypersonic missiles which was highlighted in a Rand company paper about American air defense systems and whats needed to get them on par with Russia and China. While we spent trillions on 20 years of Iraq and Afghanistan Russia and China spent trillions creating the world's best air defense systems and hypersonic missiles of which the us has 0 hypersonic missiles in service and the last test of one failed. Which prompted the quote were 10 years behind in missile technology. If you have doubts about our ability to outfit our servicemen in the best gear ask anyone who served. In 2004 when I went to Iraq we were putting sandbags in our humvees and welding steel on trying to make armor
@@vanhelsing5469👇👇 ““Russians deployed S-500 anti-aircraft missile systems in Crimea. Russians claim that the S-500 Prometheus is capable of shooting down not only medium-range ballistic missiles, but even intercontinental ballistic missiles and hypersonic targets. But it is worth noting that the Russians' statements rarely correspond to reality. Deputy CEO of an electronic warfare company and aviation expert Anatoly Khrapchinsky noted in a commentary to 24 Channel that the components of the S-500 system have already been used separately by the Russians in combination with other systems and have not shown any phenomenal effectiveness. Therefore, in his opinion, the transfer of new systems to Crimea is nothing more than a demonstrative step. After a series of defeats with the S-400 systems, the Russians need to put forward something, that they have something, because they understand that this is a significant blow to the Russian military-industrial complex through such strikes with the destruction of air defense systems, the destruction of modern aircraft. That is, they received such a powerful blow from Ukraine to their strategic facilities and to the weapons that they sold around the world. The transfer of the S-500 to Crimea will not change the situation. It is difficult for 4 batteries to cover all the losses of the Russians over the past 2 months. “
@@junnel1970 The only anti-ballistic system that has a longer range is SM-3 (600-1000 km). THAAD in turn cannot fly as far, as its primary task is to reflect MRBS in the final leg of the flight, so this is not true.
@@isadanjan4762 wala namang problema kung hindi yan totoo.pero yung Sa blogger number 1 anti air missile na S400 pinulbos lang ng Himars.mabuti pa ang Patriot pinabahaak ang hipersonic ng Russia at subok na.
If that Storm Shadow or ATACMS isn't jammed and thrown off target maybe. Just because a thing isn't invincible (what is?) doesn't mean it doesn't work or it sucks. Superior Western weapons haven't managed to push the Russians back in any meaningful way and that's really the funny part. And they have actually captured ATACMS and Storm Shadows, they've even published videos of technicians taking them apart.
Why u fools have to lie so much, Russia has no trouble shooting down Storm Shadow or ATACMS. The only way Ukraine can have any success now is by trying to saturate Russian air defenses
They stopped every one that came to the places where the air defense systems are placed. It is difficult to cover every place depending on the size of the territory of Russia.
Do you think someone using Multi-millions of dollars S-400 or S-500 missiles to destroy a few thousand dollars drone or missiles that hit inside Ukraine or some useless area, which totally have no importance to defend in first place ?? You do not need to destroy every projectile that comes to you. You need to calculate the risk-cost-benefit ratio & then let it hit the target. Repairing cost is way more cheaper than destroying it in the sky. Not everyone got a blank check like Israel.
After the recent IDF attack on Iran, this needs to be reworked
Iranian Bavar 373 is no 2 now, close second to S-400
@@rainkode8795lol obviously not bro
Isreal used aircraft to attack iran not ibcm or land luanched missle
And yet air ti surface missles still passed and hit targets so it not even close
Correction 2:43. The graphic shows country of origin as USA, instead of France and Italy.
Don't bother. It's a dogsh!t video from a dogsh!t channel.
This channel provides wrong information.
Don't you see they are biased asf? They even shamelessly put the Patriot between advanced systems 🤦🏻♂️
Bavar 373 is now tested in real combat....
Now you must at bavar after S300
S300 is thise good what about s500 😂
The Iron Dome is only good at shooting down homemade sugar rockets 😅
Would you like said homemade sugar rockets shot at your home?
Lol it countered 80% of Iran's balastic missile
@@RealInosuke lala land mate. It was 80% shot down with the help of Allies, not Israel. Israel wouldn't last one day without US and G7 support. Economically and militarily.
Yes, US is no doubt a formidable power, and it is destruction for most of the countries if you are being opposed by them.
But come on mate! Israelis probably shot 80% of the debris that was falling after being shot by the Americans
@@RealInosukecomedy😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Iron dome and thaad clearly tested its capability not like the other its just only on paper.
Well Iran Repelled ISRAELI attack with Russian and locally made Air defence systems and unlike Israeli n American air defence systems their shields were actually able to defend Iranian air space.
Iron dom is a massive failure 😂😂😂
Irone done, Arrow and David sling is already finished.. Next is Thaad turn...😂
Next are Iran's most important facilities, unlucky for them - they don't have the Iron Dome, Arrow nor the David's Sling systems
David Sling?? This guy can't remember what happened in operation True Promise 2 😂😂
There was clearly a lot of uneducated people in these comments, the Iron Dome is a very effective system, one of the best in the world in fact, but it isnt designed to counter ballistic missiles, its like being mad at an F1 car for having no luggage space.
That why I wonder!! why it in the list while it best for countering only sugar mad rocket from palestine and not any missille, it is very disgusting
We saw that from hammas rocket iron dome is a sleeper
We talking of reality not stories from your great fathers here
Iron Trash only good for propaganda lol
Yes Iron dome king of sleep 😂
😮😮😮😮
Kopong
Remember, the God of Israel never forsakes His people, nor does He deliver them into the hands of their enemies. This is why Israel emerges victorious in every war.
Is that why Israel is intact and Gaza and Lebanon are not? 🤣
@@IsraelMilitaryChannelare you comparing Israel military power to Gaza and Lebanon?😂 What a loser. Why don't you try full scale attack against Turkiye or Iran. And let see how iron dome would fare against their counter attack.
The iron dome is only good at shooting down homemade sugar short range missiles 😅😅
You are simply ignorant. Iron dome's role: interception of rockets, mortars, and drones. Name me another system which does better than the iron dome in these roles. You can't.
Nobody uses the iron dome in the world for a reason moron @@IsraelMilitaryChannel
Yes thats exactly what I said
Shooting down cheap short range missiles not advanced tactical BM
And aircrafts
Its not capable of holding number 10 @@IsraelMilitaryChannel
@@sasuke4231 The Iron Dome is a C-RAM and V-SHORAD system not a SAM system. It is specifically designed to protect military installations and assets from incoming rocket, artillery, and mortar threats. It is the most combat tested C-Ram in the world. Name me another C-Ram that is more successful. Why do you place laughing emojis? It makes it obvious that you have no clue what you're talking about.
@@sasuke4231 The Iron Dome is a C-RAM/V-SHORAD system not a SAM system. It is specifically designed to protect military installations and assets from incoming rocket, artillery, and mortar threats. The Iron Dome is the most combat test C-RAM/V-SHORAD in the world. Your emojis implies you don't know what you are talking about.
The Patriot and the Iron Dome are advanced systems, are you joking? There are plenty videos where we can see that Patriot in Ukraine actually couldn't even protect itself.
that was crazy and sad lives were lost but they shouldn't have been there.
And the S-400 systems cant even shoot down small ballistic missiles (ATACMS).
@@frederiklindegaard8400yes is has! 🤡👌🤣🤣🤣 western weapons are just expensive junk! That are just getting put to the test and failing miserably while Russian weapons continues to defeat the US around the world.
@@frederiklindegaard8400 And the Patriot can't shoot down one Iskander lol. To let the S-400 ATACMS through, Ukraine produces 6 at a time and shoots down about 4-5 of them, which is already not bad, of course no air defense can cope with a large number of ballistic targets, the Iskander is better than the American and even with one launch, it is extremely difficult for the Ukrainian air defense and its PATRIOT
@@frederiklindegaard8400 Come on, smart guy, tell me why when there were cruise missile attacks on the Pivdenne (Yuzhmash) plant, Patriot shot them down but missed one missile from iskander-k in the form of 9M728, while when launching a ballistic missile, one missile easily passed and hit the hangar of this plant. Let's not forget to add the strikes on airfields in central Ukraine and the strike on the Poltava Military Communications Academy.
How is S-500 better than Arrow when S-500 has never intercepted a ballistic missile in space in real time combat?
The S-500's anti-ballistic missiles were created on the basis of the missiles that were created for the S-300VM, in turn, this system coped well against SRBM and will probably also show itself well in improvements when inserted into the new air defense system.
@@isadanjan4762 And the interceptor of S-300VM intercepted what? What is its past historical combat record?
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel At least it can stop the Russian Iskander in theory with a higher chance than the Patriot and S-400 system, since its missile is designed for such purposes. The S-400/Patriot missiles are designed more to intercept horizontally flying targets, they can intercept ballistic missiles with a partial chance.
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel The ARROW-3 is designed more for larger ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads and it flies much further, and the S-300VM system is against SRBMs. DCS has shown that this system intercepts ballistic missiles better than other long-range SAMs like the S-400 and Patriot, its missile was designed for this task.
@@isadanjan4762 We are not interested in theories. We are interested in combat proven systems.
IRIS-T SLM ?
Bavar 373 of Iran is most advanced ADS and can easily outnumber the David sling and iron dome
Don't add iron done 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Else you will get notification from YT to lead misleading information 😂
The iron dome is one of the best defence systems
@@lior4334 yes we saw 🌚
You must be a clown
@@lior4334the best at sleeping 😂
Sampt é italo-francese
Ukraine's using the Patriot, and NAMAS to defend itself.
It's actually their 100 s-300 that protects them they have few western AA
How is that working out? 😂
@@70newlife Mostly really well. Some drones and missile did get through.
The MEADS program was canceled years ago
yeah, bullshit info here.
Lot of NAFO bots who have coping issues when it comes to Russian Air Defenses.
The same Russian air-defences that have proved largely ineffective at stopping western weapons like Storm Shadow?
And we all know how good the Russian Air Defenses are 🤣🤣
So funny seeing a Russian boy gaslight people into thinking NATO bots are a thing
Seriously if Russian air defenses did not work then a big part of Russia including parts of Moscow would be a burning hell these days looking at the frequency of Ukrainian attacks throughout the armed conflict. Almost all of them do get intercepted by Rus defenses being unbiased. But on the other hand Ukr isn't being as successful even though they also shoots down many of the drones coming from Rus side but not nearly as successful.
@@graphite8842 And American air defense in Ukraine too, Iskanders and daggers easily hit airfields and other objects
Dont worry , china will make copy all of them in short time 😂😂😂
😂😂
China already had
@@altafahmed5123 Always remember one thing , China is tiger but on paper 📜
i don't see any china air defence here.
Why would China make a copy of american' ineffective systems that can't even protect itself?
When it comes to ranking air defence systems, it would probably be best to split them into categories based on the class and type such as short or long range and exoatmospheric because then its an apples to apples comparisons.
S-300V4 is really impressive! I also read in Military Watch about the world air defense record, S-300V4 shot down MiG-29 at 234 km during Ukrainian counteroffensive in 2023.
What's surprising is that he shot down the plane because his missiles are designed to hit ballistic targets.
@@vanhelsing5469 Pantsir S1 missiles are designed to destroy short-range aerodynamic targets, but in summer it managed to shoot down ATACMS missile, and in 2022, soviet Tochka-U.
@@avadhutagita3741-1 patriot today lol.
4:38 it is mim 104 not mim 400
The UK's system is the best, as it's invisible and nobody knows it exists!👍
😂😂😂😂
what about s550
Fake. It’s A-235 anti ballistic missile.
@@vanhelsing5469 but its russian?
Its designed to destroy satellites
@@vanhelsing5469😂 it's not fake it's an anti ballistic missile interceptor that's why it's ridiculously fast and still undergoing testing. Because ballistic missiles can reach up to mach 20 you need something fast to hit it.
Make yours 🤔
What about India's "Barak 8"😅
Not tested in real conflict so cannot say anything about this system
@@khanaafaq6202 I accept our thoughts
@@sivakumarsannasi5524 i appreciate that
All defence system will fail in fight against truth 😂😂😂 . Good going RESISTANCE ARMY 💪 keep it up 👍 Majority of world peoples stands with truth, oppressed and justice
It seems the spectacular Iron dome worries many here.
Ayon Dome has just been internationally shamed...
For Israel to defend their country without any maximum damage against 200 ballistic missiles, is evidence that they have a strong air defense. But do you think that Iran will stand a chance? I doubt which is why they're on a diplomatic talks with regional leaders. Iran assets are vulnerable for attacks without any protection from IDF attack.
@@TLC-v5ySeriously... do you believe this lazy propaganda?
If it is true, then why until now has Israel not responded even after talking so much? I tell you, it's because the toy anti-aircraft defenses that Israel had were pulverized by Iran, and they are trying to rebuild with the massive support of the USA. Believe me friend, Israel is no longer the dominant power in the region, it is no match for the Persians.
@@TLC-v5y this dude just found out that other countries do not target civilian residence so he's shocked that Iran only hit military bases
Thank God for the air defense destroyers technology system
Israel's arrow 3 is the most beautiful, long distance, still tested
long and soft 😂
😅😅 iran says otherwise on oct 1
Didn’t do any shit against Iranian missiles lol
Can't defend Iranian missiles
What about Iris-T?
The BEST of them should the Pantsir S1, it can kill anything, from drones to hypersonic missiles. Ukraine hasn't been able to struck and destroy none of them lately even with HIMARS, Storm Shadows, ATACMS etc...especially, the latest version.
😂😂😂😂 this comment is crazy funny
@@charliematts1736I think he was sarcastic 😂
@@Hudelcubut he's right, damage to Pansir systems has been very limited in the battlefield.
@@ejimayang3687 he doesn't just know it well. The only system killer of any flying objects, high or low.
@charliematts1736 I'm not. Check the system, compare it to any of them, you will realize that is the top of performance on low or high altitude.
Israel: saying June 2024 Ukraine claimed the S-500 had been deployed to the Crimean peninsula to defend the Kerch Bridge. In its operational debut in Ukraine, the S-500 proved unsuccessful in defending against Ukrainian launched MGM-140 ATACMS missiles.
Russia: why?
Israel: saying Russia high technology advanced very very lower 0.01% no match for Western Storm missile, ATAMCS, GLSDB..
Bullshit! Don't believe in Ukraine, are just lying. Nearly all ATACMS and Strom Shadows towards Krim are intercepted. Russian S-Series are worlds 's best air defense systems. S-500 ist no yet operational, but S-400 is used. It's rockets are more far reaching as any other system.
Hit-to-kill doesn't increase the probability of kill, it increases the probability to miss the target.
THAAD has an epic record tho
@@fqeagles21only on test not on a real battle
@@fqeagles21says who
@@icemike1 look
@@fqeagles21 at what
This video is only for Europe research is not for World new technology
Correct 👏👏
Aku masih menyukain sistem pertahanan udara S-300 dan S-400 Buatan Rusia😊😊😊
You are in good company: NATO also likes S-300 and S-400😂
@@virtualinfinity6280Yes, these systems like ATACMS too much. That's why they let 'em hit.
@@noproki2838 Patriot also cannot cope with Iskander and has already been destroyed by it, especially since the S-300 is also often used by Ukraine.
Iranian Bavar 373 is now colse 3rd to S-400, now it's fully tested
Israel just Destroyed 3 S-300 + S-400 systems in Iran‼️
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
And Iran just destroyed all western multilayer systems in Israel 😂
@@rainkode8795explain pls? I dont know about what you talking
IRIS-T is the most sucessful SAM with a hit rate from 100 %
David sling made top 4 because it shot down a home made missile 2 years ago
S400s and s500s have proved their inability in Ukraine, they succumbed to an atacms missile, a missile made in the 1980s. And they are not great against missiles specifically with cluster warheads.
this can be verified ? i am not even aware that the s400 and 500 was used in ukraine. whats the purpose of using that in ukraine ?
Do you think someone using Multi-millions of dollars S-400 or S-500 missiles to destroy a few thousand dollars drone or missiles that hit inside Ukraine or some useless area, which totally have no importance to defend in first place ??
You do not need to destroy every projectile that comes to you. You need to calculate the risk-cost-benefit ratio & then let it hit the target. Repairing cost is way more cheaper than destroying it in the sky.
Not everyone got a blank check like Israel.
Another liar writes nonsense that the S-500 was tested in Ukraine. There is no fact anywhere that it was used, just as they write nonsense about it being hit by a missile lol. Officially, there is only one sample of this installation that is still being tested, and it does not protect anything yet lol. As for what you write about ballistic missiles, look for yourself - the Yuzhmash Patriot cannot fully protect against ballistic missiles, as well as other buildings in central Ukraine and airfields. If you open the air defenses that are there, Russia can quite easily destroy them too, but it is clear that ballistic missiles are a difficult target. And Israel was also not thrilled with the Patriot after trying to repel Iranian ballistic missiles last time (not on October 1).
@@leonardoorellano6652 absolutely right
All of them were fake news
Russia 🇷🇺has no competitors in missile technology... either in case of missile technology or anti defense system... Russia is far ahead from the rest
Yeah, because it feared the most, to get attacked😂 other countries like usa dosen't care about defense system that much, cause nobody is stupid enough to lunch an attack on us soil!
@@sinagasemzadeh3504can’t spell huh?
More like they aren't competition anymore.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 Não está interceptando nem drone de papelão ucraniano.
S-500 is not even able to defend an ATACMs missile.
Not the listing price matters only but the allocation to the community
Just add Iran 😅…today they proved
I believe that Egypt has a secret missile program comparable to the Iranian missile program. I hope for a video about this Egyptian missile program.
Fairy tale
Why secret?
it's time for the entire world to speak the truth. we have all seen what is happening in our own eyes in Europe. Russia have the best air defense system in the entire world .not by propaganda as the others do. patriot air defense system is just like a toys 🎉. all weapons are now in use in Ukraine. Abraham tanks was a game changer. Himars air defense system was a game changer. patriot air defense system was a game changer. (F 16) fighter jet was a game changer. all this America weapons are made for video games only. 🎮. meanwhile Russia has proven to the entire world that no one else can stand Russian alone face to face in any form of war. Russia war machines will burn you down to achis
dont use a spade in a spoon dish. the Russian defence system are so advance they cannot defend artillery.
❤❤❤❤نعم
For almost 3 years Russia can't even win Ukraine, Mr do your research well 👌
No NASAMS?
India’s KUSHA 💪🇮🇳❤️upcoming best LR-SAM defence system
Khuska? 😢
S 500 S 400 S 300 Pantsir S1❤❤❤
The Israeli defence system have flopped against non-state operatives, therefore, it is doubtful whether it can withstand onslaughts of powerful states.
Still here. Still kicking arse. Am yisrael chai
I don't see the flop
Arrow 4 and beam iron are missed.
Russian and terrorist trolls be like “Israeli air defenses aren’t shit, they let at least a dozen out of 180 “hypersonic(by Iranian standards)” missiles through that hit some desert & some runways” meanwhile Russia with their S-400’s and S-500’s and Pansirs and everything else cant stop a few drones from blowing up their main arsenal 😂
I am a Russian speaker and I have not seen any trolls here who are against Israel. Here, on the contrary, the trolls are idiots from English-speaking countries who write how good the Patriot is when it misses ballistic missiles, just as they write about the Russian system, forgetting about the failures of their own systems. So I don't understand the meaning of your letter and where did you see a Russian troll here? I personally said that the Iron Dome is effective because it has enough characteristics to intercept Hamas missiles that do not have supersonic speed and are made of pipes, here, of course, everything will be ok.
Let me refresh your memory - currently no long-range system can see small and plastic drones, so they must be covered by other short-range air defense systems that can detect targets at lower altitudes.
By now, the whole world knows who the real terrorists are.
Israel's territory is very small and easy to defend, and militants's missiles are slow and low-tech.
I don't need to remind you about the giant US oil refinery in Saudi Arabia in 2019.
To protect it, US installed several Skyguard and Patriot missile systems, and as resul - US air defense didn't see Iranian drone that hit the refinery, reducing global oil production by 5%. US was unable to protect the small facility, karl!
Russian ads protects thousands kilometers of border and shoot down everything they have missiles for.
Not S-400, but S-300V4 is their most technologically advanced weapon. S-300V4 holds world record for detection and shootdown range ( S-300V4 shot down MiG-29 in 2023 at 234 km distance during ukrainian offensive). Military Watch wrote about this.
This is true expert analysis
The point is that the enemy is firing too many missiles which is difficult for any air defence system to intercept. Hence we see failures for Iron dome, Patriots and S-400 systems.
Fun fact: Iran and Turkey has never shot down a single projectile in their entire lifetime.
🤣😂😂😂😂
How did Iran's missiles make it through?🤔
@@marshalljulie3676 There could be many reasons for this:
1. Saturation attack.
2. Insufficient air defense launchers or interceptors.
3. 85-90% interception rate.
4. Missile is ignored and allowed to land because projected to hit non populated area.
That being said Iran is 30 years behind Israel in air defense technology. Can Iran hit a single ballistic missile?
@@IsraelMilitaryChannelonly 1 answer is enough. Israel air defend is sucks compare to iranian missile
@@nazipunmukti8981 Iran has a 1960s air force, Israel is 50 years ahead of Iran's air force. Israel is 20 years ahead of Iran's drone technology, Israel is 20 years ahead of Iran's missile technology. Israel is 30 years ahead of Iran in air defense technology.
SAMP/T country origin is USA ? Whaaat !?
Are You from India ????
Just you wanted to advertise for Us and it's alleys and yet Russia the best air defence system
Today -1 radar and Launcher from MIM-104 Patriot missile near Dnepropetrovsk region.
the russian systems doesnt work as well as the numbers say
yes, the same as the patriots who even failed to intercept the x101 missile
Still far better than western air defenses
You are not current the S 500 is the best
@@BK-wt1lc Judging by the attack on the giant American oil refinery in Saudi Arabia in 2019, it can't even shoot down an Iranian drone. To protect it, the US installed several Skyguard and Patriot missile systems, and as a result, the US air defense did not detect the Iranian drone that hit the plant, reducing global oil production by 5%. Patriot and Skyguard couldn't protect a small facility, but Russian ones protect thousands km of border and shoot down everything they have missiles for.
@@technatural2198 even the old HAWK system works better than the russian ones
*where is MRSAM*
Turkish Air Defence System Siper has a interception range of 200 km and within only 2 years that's gonna increase to 600 km the Early Warning Radar System ALP-300G gonna have a instrumented range of 800 km
But the interception rate is only 40% lol.
@@dracula7058 99 %
@@Soungouri There is no such sam system in the world which will give you 99% interception rate 😂. Stop bluffing
@@dracula7058 it is exceptional you have no clue
@@Soungouri Ah asgardian technology. I actually don't have any clue about it.
S300??? WTF. What has it done except be a target itself???
Iron Dome is the most combat tested air defense system in the world. In regards to its role and successful interception rate, there is no other system with the same role that comes close period.
S-300V4 it’s only anti ballistic missile system (Like ARROW-3), not Full air defence.
Ukraine have found a way through the S300 and 400 due to low capacity and slow reload. Its also stupid expensive making deployment limited.
The only systems actually battle tested with success is the patriot and the three israeli systems
Sure thay are tested 1 october 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😋
@@hobby2621
And all it took back was a lifetime of budget, and complete annihilation. 5000 rockets : One time show.
Meanwhile; Haniyeh, Nasarallah and Prez. Raisi in his 'Eli Copter'
@@KRISH57676 🤫
@@hobby2621 there was video confirmation of exosphere intercepts, to date Israel is the only nation with multiple intercepts at that distance from the earths surface.
😂😂bruh come on it's been 3 years they are battle tested even than iron dome and patriot. They shot down stealthy cruise missiles with the new pentsir s the s300 is used to attack ground targets mostly the s400 shot down most of Ukraines bombers and su-27. There's no reason to lie this is public information you just have to read a lot.
Kudos to isreals defense, it had served for long...
I hope they improve....
IRONDOME 100% BEST defense 💪
Nah only good against short rang missiles
@@sasuke4231 It's OK that is good 👍
💩
@@Maxr-bq9pfin your dream
Saved my familys life hundreds of times in the past year. Works for me.
Good and informative
LMAO! This is the problem that I have with @The Buzz, they place the S-300, S-400, and S-500 over the US made Patriot when in reality the Patriot system is batter and more effective (only know system to have shot down hypersonic missiles in combat) and they placed both the S-400 and the S-500 highter than the THAAD...even when the S-300, S-400, and S-500 have failed to destroy simple HIMARS ballistic missile. In fact all three have been victims of the HIMARS. Patriots & THAAD radar, sensors, and tracking outclass any Russian system.
Who do you think pays for the channel?
Your problem is that The Buzz is not a political propaganda channel. Every day we hear Zelenski crying. Ukrainians complain the most. There is not a single independent confirmation of anything that happens in Ukraine.
Why are ANY of the Russian S systems even in this list??? The 1 and only S-500 system ever deployed in an active war zone didn't even last 2 weeks before being blown away LMAO
больше слушай пропаганду сша. дада и гиперзвук и все, а на деле сидит в засаде , и по сигналу авакс которого нельзя сбивать на секунду появляется и из засады чтото убивает. химарсы сбивают постоянно, и с-400 на это никто не тратит.
кстти патриот уничтожили теми ракетами, против котрых он создавался- искандер-м
Arrow 3 🤯
First of all, the Iron Doom is not against air systems, because it cannot shoot down targets that have a variable trajectory. Second, you don't have a single Chinese system, and they are very advanced and excellent!
Lol chaaaaai nah
@@ZionOrange I don't understand. Write in English!
@@slobodanstojanovic5521 china doesnt make anything good. They are just copies of russian tech on a cheap scale.
Read about Bangladesh and Pakistan and the problems they have had with the J8 and exploding tank barrels.
China also uses high powered RF radar which is noisy and easy to track because they lack AESA capability.
China makes junk
Why would you need all that if you dont go to war?
How can a system that has not seen combat be your number 1. How do you guys rate these systems. The best are combat proven systems, not what is written in brochures.
How do you think the whole experience of S300+S400 not being integrated in the new generation ? Like saying F4 jet is not metter then F22?
Arrow has the longest range and is actually teted in combat unlike the russian missiles
Arrow-3 is more intended for MRBS than all types of ballistic missiles, although Israel initially wanted to make it as an interceptor of nuclear warheads, but still has not worked out. Meanwhile, Russia has long had a system for intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles in the form of A-135 and A-235, which also shoot down missiles in space, but fly further in theory. And those systems that are on the list can most likely mainly only shoot down MRBS, including the Israeli one.
lol there is literally a video of the S400 launching interceptors at incoming ATACMS that fail to intercept their target, and then the S400 is obliterated by the incoming ATACMS
Aster SAMP/T is a French-Italian system.
They miss the chinese air defence system
such lists should AT LEAST be devided for troops (army) aa (including on march) and object stationary aa.
and if you went into anti-missile terretory where a-135 / a-235 and whatever US strategic missile defense called?
Thanks you Russia for S500
IDF has the Jericho 2 & 3.
Myth of Iron dome busted few days ago…it turned out to be iron net with holes.
Iron dome in not design to destroy balistic missiles. Get your fact straight. That goes to the arrow air defence. But its expensive and israel have few arrows. Iran fired 440 balistic misiles. Usa interceptepted 12 , some fell in iran. The rest was intercepted by the arrow. Over 50 made impact. Which is not bad. But remember this is the largest balistic missil attac in all of history. 50 is still impresive. But iran only have 5000 balistuc missiles. Meaning only 200 can actuatly impact israel.
Factoring cost of defence compared to cost to attack all systems are redundant. Missile defrnce can never keep ip with missile advancements.
David sling proved its failure in the iranian shelling on 1st October 2024
You should have asked for the Arrow-3 system and not David.
how do you know you understand david sling proved its failure why do you think david sling is the only interceptor israel fired??180 missile launched only 10-12 hits on military targets some of them landed in remote village or deserts.Why would the fire a missilion dollar interceptor when they found that the missile is going to land on low risk side.Missile defence is a tough topic than what media tells.
No they are actually successful but the problem was Iranians have fired over 240 supersonic ballistic missiles.
Iron dome is not soo effective to bring them down compared to Arrow 3 and david sling.
240 supersonic ballistic missiles overwhelmed them cuz there have never been this much of firing ballistic missiles together at once in world history.
@@kibun1 exactly
Best in the world Russia S500 ❤❤❤❤
Iron dom 😂😂
A good system, but it is not capable of intercepting ballistic missiles and simple supersonic missiles. Even these indicators are enough for Israel, considering that militants often make missiles from water pipes and which do not fly so fast, this system also copes with drones.
@@isadanjan4762 david sling no worke 😉😁
@@isadanjan4762 you know the problem? Those pipe rockets cost almost 0$, even those pipes are donated by the EU, while iron dome missiles cost millions and are manufactured at the US. Israel have run out of those missiles and are spending billions to buy new ones.
@@aligator2150 The Iron Dome itself still intercepts 90% of Hamas' subsonic missiles, which has been demonstrated more than once, so in this case, given what non-modern means (except Iran) Israel's opponents have, this interception system is enough for them for now. Israel has made its own systems for other purposes.
Iron Dom f..k defence system 😂😂😂😂
Western and isareli systems ki, Iran, Houthi, Hebozallah, Iraq groups and Russia ne wat lagadi hai😂😂
Russia is still on top. All the videos about the air defense systems. That's incredible 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Arrow 3 and others are more so BMD than SAM
The world has seen how bad Russian air defence is ... its comical that you have them no.1&2 🤣🤣 ...The ONLY S500 system Russia had was obliterated by a 30 year old NATO missile !
Yeah in RUclipsr Videos
Mean while iran doomed all irondoom, patriot, arrow all in jusr one attack
Cool, Patriot couldn't shoot down "Kinzhal" over the airfield in Khmelnytsky region, as well as let cruise missiles fly to Lviv through, there was a strike there recently too. By the way, if you don't know, S-500 is still in the testing stage, it is not used as the main air defense and there is only one model. What Ukraine says is also military censorship nonsense, there is no fact of use yet.👍
I will also add by the way that the attack was on Poltava, where the Swedish instructors were located, the Iskander missiles passed through the Ukrainian air defense without any problems and accurately hit the building twice.
You're an idiot Russia has the only AD platform that can intercept hypersonic missiles which was highlighted in a Rand company paper about American air defense systems and whats needed to get them on par with Russia and China. While we spent trillions on 20 years of Iraq and Afghanistan Russia and China spent trillions creating the world's best air defense systems and hypersonic missiles of which the us has 0 hypersonic missiles in service and the last test of one failed. Which prompted the quote were 10 years behind in missile technology. If you have doubts about our ability to outfit our servicemen in the best gear ask anyone who served. In 2004 when I went to Iraq we were putting sandbags in our humvees and welding steel on trying to make armor
@@vanhelsing5469👇👇
““Russians deployed S-500 anti-aircraft missile systems in Crimea. Russians claim that the S-500 Prometheus
is capable of shooting down not only medium-range ballistic missiles, but even intercontinental ballistic missiles and hypersonic targets. But it is worth noting that the Russians' statements rarely correspond to reality. Deputy CEO of an electronic warfare company and aviation expert Anatoly Khrapchinsky noted in a commentary to 24 Channel that the components of the S-500 system have already been used separately by the Russians in combination with other systems and have not shown any phenomenal effectiveness. Therefore, in his opinion, the transfer of new systems to Crimea is nothing more than a demonstrative step. After a series of defeats with the S-400 systems, the Russians need to put forward something, that they have something, because they understand that this is a significant blow to the Russian military-industrial complex through such strikes with the destruction of air defense systems, the destruction of modern aircraft. That is, they received such a powerful blow from Ukraine to their strategic facilities and to the weapons that they sold around the world.
The transfer of the S-500 to Crimea will not change the situation. It is difficult for 4 batteries to cover all the losses of the Russians over the past 2 months. “
Eeee ..( surprised 😯 by China ) 🤫🤫🤫🔥🔥💥
russia most advance?
it was a joke :)
Na, ob die Reihenfolge so stimmt? 😁
Ich vermisse IRIS-T SLM 😢
No China.. Lol..😂😂
Zero surprise 😁
Why never mention India Israel Mr Barak Sam 😏
We have INDIA's 🇮🇳 VISHWAGURA JUMLA 😂😂😂
Ha ha ha 😂😂😂 ur correct 😄 😅😅😅 foolish PM modi
Thaad range is 2,500 km not 200 km.
Proof ?
@@isadanjan4762 mag research ka.250 km ang taas sa himpapawid pero sa aabot ng 2,500 km anti balisti missiles yung Thaad.
@@junnel1970 The only anti-ballistic system that has a longer range is SM-3 (600-1000 km). THAAD in turn cannot fly as far, as its primary task is to reflect MRBS in the final leg of the flight, so this is not true.
@@isadanjan4762 wala namang problema kung hindi yan totoo.pero yung Sa blogger number 1 anti air missile na S400 pinulbos lang ng Himars.mabuti pa ang Patriot pinabahaak ang hipersonic ng Russia at subok na.
S-500 and S-400 @ #1 & #2. Someone has been on the Russia propaganda crack. 😂😂😂. They cannot intercept 30-years old Storm Shadow or ATACMS.
Why do u fools have to keep lying? Russians have been shooting down storm shadows and atacms
If that Storm Shadow or ATACMS isn't jammed and thrown off target maybe. Just because a thing isn't invincible (what is?) doesn't mean it doesn't work or it sucks. Superior Western weapons haven't managed to push the Russians back in any meaningful way and that's really the funny part. And they have actually captured ATACMS and Storm Shadows, they've even published videos of technicians taking them apart.
Why u fools have to lie so much, Russia has no trouble shooting down Storm Shadow or ATACMS. The only way Ukraine can have any success now is by trying to saturate Russian air defenses
They stopped every one that came to the places where the air defense systems are placed. It is difficult to cover every place depending on the size of the territory of Russia.
Do you think someone using Multi-millions of dollars S-400 or S-500 missiles to destroy a few thousand dollars drone or missiles that hit inside Ukraine or some useless area, which totally have no importance to defend in first place ??
You do not need to destroy every projectile that comes to you. You need to calculate the risk-cost-benefit ratio & then let it hit the target. Repairing cost is way more cheaper than destroying it in the sky.
Not everyone got a blank check like Israel.
Iron dome proven and tested
What a load of crap. We all know Russian equipment is massively overrated the knars
Cope harder
Thaad maximum range is 200 km not 400 ...😂