Express Your Needs: The 4 Steps of Nonviolent Communication

Communication is the essence of human interaction. It is in these communications that we can get or cause emotional injury. So how can we transform our exchanges into connections that are more empathetic, understanding, and effective?
In this video Dr. Ko shares the transformative model of Nonviolent Communication, developed by Marshall Rosenberg.
In this insightful video, Dr. Ko breaks down the four crucial steps of Nonviolent Communication: Observation, Feelings, Needs, and Requests.
Learn how to start conversations by observing without judgment, express your feelings without blame, identify and convey your needs clearly, and make constructive requests. This method not only enhances personal and professional relationships but also helps in reducing internal mental anguish and conflict stemming from interpersonal dynamics.
By the end of this video, you'll have a clear understanding of how to apply these principles to everyday situations to promote a more harmonious and respectful dialogue. If you're looking to deepen your communication skills and enrich your interactions with others, this video is your essential guide.
🤗Subscribe to stay informed and empowered in your healing journey.
🎧Endscreen music 🎶
Skyline by Luke Hall / c_luke_hall
Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported - CC BY-SA 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/3pDjlby
Music promoted by Audio Library • Skyline - Luke Hall (N...
DISCLAIMER: THESE VIDEOS DO NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE
This information, including but not limited to, text, graphics, images, video, and other materials contained on this RUclips channel are for informational purposes only. No material on this side is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always see the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare professional with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or treatment and before undertaking a new health care regiment. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have seen on this RUclips channel. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, a physician-patient relationship. This video describes the off-label use of ketamine and the FDA has not approved ketamine for use in mood /pain disorders.
======================================================
Our mission at Reset Ketamine is to provide innovative, holistic, and rapid treatment for depression, anxiety, PTSD, & chronic pain so you can go back to living a whole, healthy life.
Reset Ketamine is the first ketamine infusion clinic in Palm Springs, California & serves the entire Coachella Valley.
Want to learn more? Check our website at www.resetketamine.com/
** Check out our latest blog! Link below **
goo.gl/UkishG
Follow us on all the socials at:
Instagram / resetketamine
Facebook / resetketamine
Twitter / resetketamine

[@vladvlog9677]

No, most of conflict comes from competition for resources, territory and sex. Nothing to do with communication - an over-rated human expression, best left for white-collar office environments.

[@MrRellic]

I disagree, unresolved trauma creates unmet needs that people carry into their adulthood leads to patterns of communication based on warped views of themselves, others, and the world which cause a lot of conflict. On the surface, a couple may be fighting over responsibilities and resources, but the reason they're communication takes forms of verbal abuse rather than communication about their needs and discussing solutions is because they learned to deny responsibility and win through expressing the most anger. The way material conditions are negotiated depends not just on those conditions but the beliefs and psychological health of the negotiators. Any point of view is essentially an expression of faith on the part of the person saying it, even if it is denying they have any

[@vladvlog9677]

@@MrRellic Your argument can be reduced to this: A, will function healthily or not, depending on B happening or not, which will result in C, the desired behaviour or not. But you are saying that because A and C are most likely is not happening, you know B is the cause on both. But you can never prove one way or another B is the cause. You are going round in circles trying to prove what you see in life and in people's behaviour, hoping one day, to see the desired behaviour. Except it never comes. It is the old 'If only...' plea to people, used by Marxists, Christians, and Social Reformers to keep arguing for the validity of their beliefs in their 'ism' rather than accepting defeat. Psychoanalysis has been around for over a century now and their disciples have failed to get your hopeful (delusional, I believe) outcome.