The Trijicon MRO HD is NOT the Worst Red Dot on the Market
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024
- The beginning of the Trijicon redemption arc.
The MRO HD is not the worst red dot on the market, and my new favorite LPVO kind of rules.
An updated review of the Trijicon Credo 1-6 SFP BDC, and the MRO HD.
Support this channel on SubscribeStar for bonus content:
www.subscribes...
Amazon affiliate links for the stuff in this video:
amzn.to/3WXr7gu - MRO HD low mount (Scalarworks dropped the HD from their site)
amzn.to/3Xiu5fm - Credo 1-6 SFP BDC
Hi Hop I’m the CEO for Trijicon and I have watched everyone of your videos and appreciate your feedback, we will study the issues and rectify them in 5 or 6 years.
lmao, "in 5 or 6 years"
Or just Lie like another company....
holy shit
🤣
@@1olddirtroadlike sig?
He doesn't hate it! Clearly the 100k subscriber mark has addled his mind, we're gonna need to put Hop down now 😔
Hollywood hop, he gets a couple subscribers and has to change up everything.
He's still the same old Hop. It's not like he bought some eyebrows.
HoploThumb incoming :(
We got too cocky bros
he was a good dog :/
Trijicon is so big and makes so much money off the ACOG that the people who make the MRO have never been introduced to the people who make the ACOG or RMR.
Such a good point. Probably true.
You would be surprised. Manufacturing might be vast and spread out but engineering is typically a tighter knit, smaller group. Although yes, the people who designed the older products may have left the company by now.
@@Jordan-nc3zy I’m a mechanical engineer at a major corporation so I find it believable from my own experiences at least
@@Dompropat fair. I was just saying that since all of their designers are in Michigan that they would be more likely to work together than separate facilities
@@Jordan-nc3zy but also true there should be some overlap if one group needs input from another. Could just be a project management issue more than anything
The best quote @8:52 "If your #1 requirement when buying an LPVO is red dot bright illumination, then the optic you should be buying is called a Red Dot."
the trijicon 1-6 credo HX (single red dot) is daylight bright
@@TheSharpshooter300Is that one also a true 1x or does it also have the typical LPVO 1.1x - 1.3x issue?
The other baffling thing is that Trijicon didn't just make a gen 2 with both ends at 25mm. But Primary Arms beat them with the MD25, and Bushnell with the TRS 25.
I bought that Primary Arms. Wanted to like it. The goddamn power turret is so stiff that it's hard to turn the thing on with one hand.
Now you might say that I've got little bitch fingers, and you'd probably be right. But I've talked to many others out there, and it seems like every single MD25 is the same way. Good fuckin luck turning that thing on in a rainstorm.
@@donjohnson5172 all their stuff that turns is tight. The diopters are probably the worst but is it what it is
@ZyklonBeast yea, they'll loosen up with use. If fact, in an interview between Primary Arms and TFBtv, they said they make it stiffer intentionally. Their reasoning is, after years of use, everything that rotates loosens up, some more than others.
Think of it as a scale of 1-10, with 10 being so tight it can't move, and 1 being so loose it spins freely. 5 is perfectly in the middle and where people like it. But if it starts as a 5 out of the box, it will quickly become a 4 and eventually a 3. On the other hand, if it starts as a 6-7, it will become a 5ish after the break-in period.
When im in a “not updating the format of my optics” competition and my opponent is any military grade optic
Hop, you are almost too well informed. Your video arrangements are a breath of fresh air from the other toobers winging their shit and talking out of their ass. This is actual journalism. Thanks I won't be buying an MRO but maybe a ACOG.
For me, it's the MRO. The best red dot available. I even use it for top, offset and regular mounts and Trijicon is willing to oblige to make the mounts.
One time I asked Trijicon for a lower 1/3 mount and they gave me three different mounts. I said, "Wow, three for free!" and the nice friendly Trijicon customer service worker laughed and said, "I'm going to call you 3-for-free!".
Now the CS at Trijicon greets me with "hey it's 3-for-free!" and ALWAYS give me three mounts when I buy an optic from their website. It's such a fun and cool atmosphere at Trijicon, I go order from them at least 3 times a year for scopes, red dots, acogs, 1-2 times for a kill flash, and maybe once for a magnifier. I can get and can match my shooting needs.
I even use my ACOGs on carry handles, it works great! What a great optics company.
LMAO
Is this parody?
Already had dinner but glad you served up this pasta anyway
The SRS was a kick ass optic for sure and is 100% worth getting second hand if you can find one for under $600. I ran mine for a while and it did great with night vision and was a fantastic alternative for people that have issues with EoTech reticles turning into fuzzy bullshit. I've used mine for blasting hogs at night for a couple years and it works decently under night vision, but it would benefit from being just a hair brighter.
I wish Trijicon would bring it back and it could absolutely have a place at the $600-$700 price range for how well they performed, but they aren't worth $1200.
For the record, I ended up trading it recently for a CompM5 and 1.93 LEAP mount to some dude super thirsty for a SRS.
Talk about an upgrade
@@borkwoof696 it's an upgrade, but not as much as you might think. On a Unity riser, the SRS was positioned right and it's almost as forgiving as my XPS3-0. The biggest difference is the actual and noticeable weight savings and being much more compact.
Part of me regrets it, but with no parts or warranty support on the SRS, I wanted that extra bit of security. Warranty and the value of the CompM5 were the biggest reasons for doing the trade. I had paid $400 for the SRS so it was a fantastic trade up.
but that srs is ugly, its looks like it come from the cold war era.
@@harisyoung4110 makes it look cooler imo
This didn’t age well
It's amazing how bad Trijicon is at making 4x lpvos. Both the credo, and accupower were identical in suck factor. But the same goes for the tr24. The tr25 and credo 1-6's are both Vastly Superior to their 4x Brothers. I just can't fathom as to why.
I wish we could get an SRS re-release at a better price point, I love the way those optics look.
I will never forgive trijicon for discontinuing the SRS before I could get one.
This makes sense only because they had a market niche with the window size. Why waste it?
@@nathanchappell1886 Man I'd be willing to sell mine. It's just sad in the range bag.
I wish they would just sell ACOG's for $200 so I can buy 6 or 8 of them.
Already commented on your last Credo video, but I will again with a different set of features I love because I am a huge Credo fan. The LPVO is not the end-all-be-all of optics choices, but the Credo 1-6 provides tremendous value in almost all aspects that would make a shooter select an LPVO: simple and usable reticle at close and long range, glass that makes the top-end maginifaction useable, capped turrets, lightweight-ish (18 oz before you put your Unity tall boi tanodized and double the weight), and a provided thread-in throw lever. Love not doing my job and watching your videos, keep doing what you're doing
Are the 1-4 really worse? I'd be interested in a 1-4, but don't really want a 1-6 since I don't want that much magnification but a 1-4 with good 1x is something I'd like to try out.
I took a 2 day carbine course and I used an MRO sitting on a Geissele Mount. I honestly never had an issue. I can however see how that fish eye might annoy some peeps. It didn't bug me at all though and it performed very well!.
Listening to him calmly yet methodically dismantle the value of certain products makes me squirm and I'm not even an owner of these products. Imagine being part of the company responsible and having to watch this pop up on your feed as you are trying to sip your morning coffee haha.
Really enjoy the way that you break down features at the end user level, not the marketed claims of performance. Thank you for all the time and money you spend to share your experiences with us.
I will say, Trijicon customer service in my experience is top notch. I bought an MRO HD and 3x magnifier 2nd hand and was missing the longer screws for the riser on the magnifier. I emailed asking what the length and thread pitch was so that I could find them, and they emailed back a polite version of "don't do that you dummy, whats your address?" and sent me the replacement screws for free.
“You shoot red dots with both eyes open, your other provides field of view.”
I am honestly glad you say this because so many serially online morons ignore this completely while having a jerk sesh about their favorite gear
Cross dominance means this doesn’t work for everyone- hence big field of view can still be valuable
@@FMDad-dm5qoYup, Eotechs, Romeo 8T’s, and maybe the 9T now but that shet is expensive as hell.
The MRO would've turned out better if it underwent a training arc, then have Trijicon host a tournament arc to let the best red dot come out on top
I love how you guys cut through so much hype, marketing and general BS! Thank you!
You give, by far, the best reviews for optics and other gear. Keep it up my dude, really helpful for people new to the scene.
I’ve had my trijicon credo 1-6 bdc for about two years now. The glass is super clear and the build quality is nothing to scoff at. Best sub $1000 lpvo on the market.
I've had the 1-6x Credo for about a year now, I like it a lot. My 1x is slightly less than a true 1x, but I usually run it at 2 or 3 anyway
My high contrast brain has decided that I now must sell all of my ACOGs.
Any chance either of you will be reviewing the lead and steel LP-1 soon? Looks like it might be a cheaper Romeo 8T...
I know this is sarcasm but my dm’s are open if not lol
Hop, your original MRO video was the reason I sold mine and got a T2. Especially under a EOTech 3x magnifier the difference was huge and the parallax issue was a total deal breaker for me.
No regerts.
Now if trijicon could just come out with an enclosed rmr with a battery tray...
Never happening. Trijicon abandoned innovation after making their name. Now they just expect you to pay top dollar for tired old designs because Trijicon. Especially when it comes to the RMR since it is the “industry standard”.
I wanna sell my MRO too. Lol
Same! Sold my MRO parallax was terrible inside 25 yards 2 in right! I wanted to love it and really like the scarlworks mount oh well back to eotech
Since the rcr came out since this comment, have you checked that out? Haven't heard much hype about them
@BarnDoor-won5ve T2 still working great. Now have agency provided Aimpoint ACRO P2 which replaced my RMR.
I ended up going with a Holosun EPS for my EDC before trijicon came out with their new stuff.
The most no nonsense reviews. Thanks Hop.
Another much appreciated honest review by The Hop!! Thanks for another awesome video! Currently saving for the EOTECH
Thank you for the honest, quick, and easy review. It's refreshing when there are so many people, even the bigger guntubers, who won't talk about the issues with optics\gear.
I was considering the MRO for my next dot, and granted I hadn't done a ton of research on them yet, but I hadn't heard of some of the issues you noted.
Thanks.
Underrated guntuber 👍🏻 Thanks for the concise reviews.
Articulate.. yes. Concise.. Not so much. Verbose maybe
I bought a Acro C1 for my IPSC production gun and didn’t care much for it. Put it on my AR and are blown away. The small real estate and window are suddenly perfect. Good optics with clear glass and a fairly clean dot. Situational awareness are fantastic. Battery life is quite poor with 5-6 months life. I’m buying the C2 to get that problem out of the way. Another tip is the LPVO Swarovski Z8i. Pricey as hell but fantastic glass and clarity.
My MRO HD justifications:
-Better glass than MRO (less tint)
-Better reticle options with segmented circle
-Much better clarity under magnification
-Good battery life on dot setting with the ability to switch to circle/dot if desired
-Great aftermarket support with plenty of mount options
-Theoretically tougher and better technology than something like Holosun
Please feel free to blow holes in my logic here... I do own the MRO HD, so maybe I'm secretly hoping everyone agrees with me!
The credo 1-6 is super underrated. You need to get a video on it.
I bought an Aimpoint Pro secondhand too many years ago to remember when, and it’s still working just fine. Happy with all the drama I’ve avoided.
LPVO’s on the other hand…
The SRS was my first expensive optic. I snagged it for $900 new with the proprietary QD mount.
It takes a beating. The reflection is meh. But workable. Yhe illumination adjustment and holding both to turn it off are finicky. The kill flash grate really is aggravating so I didn't shoot much with it. And I ended up actually ditching it for the Primary Arms GLX 2x prism cuz dots smear in my eyes regardless.
But it performed well (not compared to price byt well enough to work consistently) and you had no fear of dropping it down a flight of stairs...or using it as a projectile weapon.
Field of view truly spoiled me. But I survived.
I just got a credo 1-6 sfp and have only had it out 2 times but really enjoying it so far.
“I have a learning disability”
He just like me FR FR
Similar experience here. I own an MRO and it’s a very meh optic. I don’t use night vision so those issues don’t affect me.
I bought a Credo HX 1-6 a while back and have been saying for a while that it’s a very good LPVO. Glad you got one too and like it.
11:52 - . Spoiler: I just emailed them. They have now. ...Surprise!
I liked my Credo 1-8, but I did end up selling it. I'm testing a Sig 1-10 SFP right now and it's OK for 1/3 the price. The thing I learned from the Credo is that I'm not sure FFP is all it's cracked up to be.
Honestly I was wondering what how the Trijicon MRO & HD stacked up against the Aimpoint RDS. Similar price points with pros/cons that I think make them a good match up. Great review as usual Hop.
I am absolutely in LOVE with the credo 1-8s. And I had an old accupoint 1-4 that's been with me a long time with no issues. But trijicon is still trijicon and when I had the opportunity to trade a mro for a t1 I did
the quality and writing and critical takes of these reviews keep improving. really good content.
I bought a Trijicon MRO HD from Midway earlier this year when they were on sale, and I have to admit that it surprised me, too. MUCH better than the original MRO, though I also agree that they should never have included the reticle option (which I don’t use). My MRO HD is currently on my BCM MK2 Recce-14, and it compliments that carbine well. The battery life issue doesn’t bother me because I change my red dot batteries every two years, but it would have been nice if they had preserved the original MRO’s battery life, at least (and not had to jack up the price $250 while doing so).
Love your stuff Hop. Great video.
Glad the 1-6 credo worked out for you. I have a 1-8 and 2-10 and they're great.
I pretty much share all of Hop's opinions on the MRO - I could barely zero the first one I had because of the parallax issue. I also have a Credo 1-8 FFP and think its the shit. Glad to see that the 1-6 is an improvement on the 1-4.
I zeroed mine in about 5 rounds at 50 yards.
I have a 1-4 Accupower that I bought right before they were discontinued and replaced with the Credo. Since they were just trying to dump the old models I got it for $480 and I absolutely love that optic at that price point.
A lot of the issues with Trijicon's LPVOs would not even be mentioned if they were priced around $500-$700 instead of $800-$1000
I caught my 1-4 Accupower at Primary around that price. Lil tank of a scope. Forgiving eyebox. Part of me wishes I got 2 just cuz as I learned more about glass the more I saw how useful it would have been.
I bought a brand new Accupower 1-4x for $600
I bought MROs because I couldn't afford a T2. When I finally could afford a T2, I couldn't find that or an H2 in stock anywhere. I got an Aimpoint Duty RDS recently, and it's WAY better than an MRO. What do you do with an MRO once you have a replacement? Sell it on the secondary market for like $10?
Great review and insights! Thanks Hop!
It is INSANE how different the 2 are.
I bought an MRO green dot, returned it the next day as it was so bad it was unusable. I could only convince the store to the take it back if I got the HD. And it's awesome. Wtf... one version unusable, other version great?
The MRO is a product of Drunk Trijicon and the HD was their attempt to make amends after starting a 12 step program.
I liked my issued ACOG. I thought if I liked that, I would like thier red dot. Turns out the MRO sucks.
I thought I had a bad one, then found reviews including yours pointing out what I learned the hard way.
MRO being kinda middle of the road with middle of the road pricing just makes me not kinda like it. It doesn't do anything better than the t2, but then the better performance from other low cost value optics just seems lacking. Idk, just seems like a half assed trijicon optic to me
I wish red dots actually looked like they do in videos for me. God damn astigmatism. I did notice that green dots don't bloom as bad for myself.
You just found yourself another sub. You deserve to hit a million my bro
Crushing it with the subs, congrats dude
Bottom battery loading RDS for pistols, are an automatic fail... No matter how "good" they are.
Trijicon can have the top spot again, when they get with the times.
Lol
Agreed. The higher end holosun pistol red dots are unironically better than the RMR. China bad and all that, but holosun makes fantastic products.
If Trijicon would just come out with an enclosed version of the rmr with a battery mounting tray it would be top tier.
@@asdfghjk2933 🤣
So what was the problem with the SRO? While it's not the most durable optic, it's great for competition and range work with a great window.
I have two of the Credo 1-6's and I've got and had other well known high end scopes. I'll say this about the Credo's I have. The glass is crystal from edge to edge, and the closest 1 to 1 I've ever looked through. They aren't heavy at 18.9 oz yet there's a heaviness there that says It's built very well. I also like the on/off between each alumination. And the reticle sub tensions are 19" wide at their respective ranges. I would not hesitate to encourage someone to buy one for a 556 / 16".
I really miss the RX01 mounted of those forward handle mounts, even though I hated the amber color I really liked how that sight just worked with no frills lol
I have credo 1-6 HX not the BDC reticle, the red dot with hash marks. Happy with it, no regrets 807.00 from EUROOPTIC.
Hop back again with another high quality video. Highest quality right now im a huge fan dude.
Much appreciated!
I've got the 2.5-10 credo. I enjoy it, but it needs a parallax adjustment knob and a better eye box at 10x. If you move JUST ever so slightly off center at max power the ocular lense is a blackout lol
Tenmile is a very good long range rifle option, IMO. They're still on a killer sale at EuroOptic and while there are better scopes out there, at the current EuroOptic sale prices, it's awfully hard to match the quality per dollar.
To be fair to the MRO HD, you get a rated 2.5 years of battery life if you use the red dot alone on the same setting. So in realistic red dot settings that will put you at a year-ish. Using the circle around it is what draws so much extra battery due to it's inefficient LED design relative to say Holosun.
Fantastic review as always brother!
Good info.
I just wanna say that I like your little narcissistic bombshell you dropped, it made me smile, thanks Hop
Awesome review. I really enjoy watching your videos.
I still struggle to see how MROs are people's go-to choice. If you want a good red dot and your budget is around $500, how can you NOT choose aimpoint?
Congrats on 100k Hop!
100% Agree with you. I got the MRO some time ago. To begin with, the brand new MRO I got came in with a lens defect. Sent it back immediately. The replacement was good to go but all the flaws you mention are there. I wanted to love it. But dont. Should have gotten the Primary Arms MD-20 instead. At a 1/3 of the price. Which I do have on another build by the way. Far superior optic over the MRO. Yup. I said it.
Mro HD and Aimpoint T2 are the only red dots that didn’t look like an oil slick smear. The MRO HD reflection is negligibly annoying but if you running the circle dot reticle you don’t see it. Basically came down to price for me at the time it was cheaper than the T-2 with the scalarworks mount and I don’t own nor can afford night vision so half of the complaints are moot to me. The main reason to buy the HD is that it’s actually usable for people with astigmatism.
How is the battery life? Hop claims it's only 75 days or 1800 hours for the circle dot. If that's true, then I don't see the benefit of the MRO HD over an actual holo sight like an eotech.
@@asdfghjk2933 there is a benefit if the dot actually looks like a dot and not a smear/starburst. Reverting back to what I said you have to think of it like an eotech alternative that is potentially clearer to people with astigmatism. I tried eotech at demos and it looked like a blur. Astigmatism is very subjective though and what works for me may not for others. That’s why it’s beneficial for people to look through these optics at the store if you can instead of buying them straight off optics planet or midway USA and hoping they will work.
@@asdfghjk2933 The MRO HD is also significantly lighter than an Eotech. There are no free lunches in physics, only trade offs. Choose wisely for your application.
IMO, the best Trijicon LPVO is the Credo HX 1-6, emphasis on the HX. Daylight bright reticle if you're into that and everything else Hop requires in an LPVO. 😉
I usually use a camera to tell if the smear I see is due to the dot or because of my astigmatism. For my cheapo Holosuns, it's always been my astigmatism. The dot looks perfect through a camera, but that MRO looks like what my dot looks like, but due to my astigmatism, through your camera. Wild.
Now we just need a better reticle for acogs.
Doesn't matter. They sell two screws and a plate with holes in it for 99 bucks. You can get the same results with sheet metal from ace hardware, a drill, and a dream. We just need to wait for their patents on fiber optic lighting to expire so we can get more optics that can self-illuminate.
I have a 1-8 FFP red/green and I love it
The 1-8 credo hx is the best lpvo you can find for under 1k
You are definitely one of my favorite Guntubers.
Congrats on the 100k!!
Surely that battery life for the MRO HD is wrong? that only comes out to 1800 hours on a dim indoor brightness. That's almost as bad as holographic optics, what the hell?
Lol, I have the first generation of the MRO with the greed dot on a lower 1/3 Trijicon mount and it works good for me. Chews up battery way faster than the red, but I like it. That being said, my favorite Trijicon optics are my 3-9x40 AccuPoint (TR20-1G) with the duplex reticle, center green dot illumination, my 1-4 AccuPoint (TR24R) with the red triangle on a post reticle, and my 3.5x ACOG (TA11E) with the red chevron reticle.
At around 4:10, what website were you using to look at the used MRO's? I'm looking for someplace that'd be more or less reliable when it comes to second-hand optics.
Ive tried so many different Trijicon offerings over the last 6 or so years, prior to that my red dot experience wasnt great. I really cant remember what the names of the red dots id tried before were but they were all brand new for 2009 and 2010, and they were terrible so i was soured on dots for awhile. Of all the Trijicon sights i picked up since i got my 1st TA01NSN in Jan 2017 the only one that stuck was a TA31RCO-M150 and thats ONLY because i nerded out and built a super accurate gwot M4A1 clone lol. There just isnt much they make that i lve had good experieces with outside of the sit'n'shoot ranges my grandpa likes us to go to whenever my dad is visiting.
I got a smokin deal on a used EXPS3-2 from a buddy last spring, he only wanted tree-fiddy. Its been an awesome sight and i dont see me getting rid of it anytime soon
Only Trijicon product I own is the RMR. I've looked through and ACOG but never shot a rifle with one. ACOG has a great battlefield rep so...
I have one LPVO, a Weaver 1-5x that fits my needs and the glass is excellent.
Other ARs have either an EoTech or Aimpoint on them. They work great.
So many choices out there now with some good and others not so good that I can see why beginners get confused and don't know what to do.
Thank you again for the quick honest videos
Haha I'm gonna forward this link to trijicon.... Just for funsies
Good video as always man!
-Walsh
I bought 3 MRO's within 2 weeks and was so bad they got placed back in their boxes and 3 EOTech EXPS-2'S were procured and no issues since. Now, just what to do with the MRO's.....
I own lots of high end red dots and LPVO and not a single shitter (holosun), like the RMR Type 2, EXPS 3-4, T2, COMP M5b, MRO HD, ATACR 1-8, MK 8 1-8, VCOG 1-8 and another 6 that I can think of. I do not however own night vision. The MRO HD is decent, I will admit that circuit board is a bit obnoxious. If they aren’t going to fix it, in my opinion it is a $400 dot at most. The blue tint doesn’t bug me whatsoever though. As for your review on the Credo, I have never looked through one but guys get caught up on “daylight bright”LPVO. I have said it maybe 20 times on RUclips and I will say it again…You don’t need Aimpoint bright for an LPVO. The reason for this is even if you are shooting on a perfectly clear day, in Antarctica at high noon on something that is white, the contrast of the etched reticle will do the job, and vice versa, if it is sunset and even if shooting at a darker target with the sun at the back of the target, the dot will be bright enough to contrast the dark target. You said it spot on “if you need an LPVO to be red dot bright, get a red dot.” Even my S&B dual dot 1-8 doesn’t require me to put sunscreen on like an Aimpoint does on max setting. 🤦🏽♂️
Time for Trijicon to get on the GWOT retro bandwagon and throw all the improved tech into an SRS shaped red dot. Time is a flat circle anyway.
Just here for the firearm fashion advice, what's the trend this month? Are ACOGs back in style? Can I wear mine again for the fall season?
Glad I waited for the review. I'll stick with the T2! Thanks again for the hard work!
Aimpoint micros are 18mm ocular and objective. Good video either way.
As a side note, you would not have liked the SRS either. Heavy, shitty battery life, square hali around dot. I bought one thru 3.5 and got the 50% discount. I played around with it on a couple of platforms. It worked best with my Flir T50.......for a red dot. It sucked under Gov't PVS14. Sold it for $50 more than I paid for it on ARFCOM. Buyer seemingly got a good deal price wise. Also, the Credo series still takes a back seat to the older TR24 that is still lightweight Champion.
Did some extensive testing of the MRO, eotech and aimpoint for selection of an issued optic. MRO seemed to get the most favorable reviews. Eotech guys liked the circle dot reticle with added battery life, aimpoint guys were glad to have the option of just the dot. Would I put one on my personal gun- eh. I picked up an aimpoint RDS before it hit the general market, and I think it’s perfectly acceptable and the price is right. I’ve owned plenty of T2s, comp series etc so I’m definitely team aimpoint. But $900+ for a compm5s (or any red dot) is ridiculous. Trijicon does a few things right, but seem exceptionally resistant to innovation. I just want a side or load RMR and a mil reticle in a Acog.
My desire for a Credo 1-6x is that it is the lightest/robust and most useful optic solution that i gamed out for a 7.62x51 "spotter" rifle to accompany a bolt gun. The 308 hunter BDC lines up well with 100m increments to 550m, and after that the drop begins to multiply and the bottom post tops at 976m with Swiss Saltech M80 ball. I could probably get away using an old Viper PST 1-6x but my ballistic calculations were making my eyes twitch.
Your reviews and dry mono tone are growing on me. They're not bought and paid for. If it sucks youre not going to hold back to save face. 110% honest.
Good shit hop 🙌 your content is spectacularly different than most pew tubers and I couldn't give you a better compliment
Trijicon SHOULD watch this channel as I am watching to help me decide whether or not to buy a Trijicon LPVO and I'd bet there are 100'0's more just like me. And I love my MRO on top of my MP5
i have a 152K serial MRO and I really like it, has thousands of rounds on it and its held up really well. there is def better dots out there but i think its in a good price point for what you get. the things pretty tough and the foot print is relatively small. i think i got mine for mid 300s and I would do it again.
My favorite lpvo are my SIG Sauer Tango 1-4 FFP. I like Primary Arms optics but I just keep going back to the SIG Sauer Tango's.
"I recognize other needs for an LPVO may different than mine. I also recognize that your wrong."
- Hop 2022
How about the Vortex second focal plane 1-4 LPVO? I've been thinking of getting one for the AR I'm building because the local CMP limits the max magnification on their test to 4X.
Thank you Hop
_very nice_