Check out the gear used for the comparison video in the description. Timecodes: 00:00 - Anthem Clean Tone 00:24 - Anthem Dirty Tone 00:49 - BV25M Clean Tone 01:14 - BV25M Dirty Tone 01:39 - BV25M-SP Clean Tone 02:04 - BV25M-SP Dirty Tone 02:29 - BV30H Clean Tone 02:54 - BV30H Dirty Tone 03:19 - BV30V Clean Tone 03:44 - BV30V Dirty Tone 04:09 - Greyhound Clean Tone 04:34 - Greyhound Dirty Tone 04:58 - Watchtower Clean Tone 05:23 - Watchtower Dirty Tone
How a speaker demo should be done.Back to back,same riff,you always know which speaker is playing,easy to skip around,no random blues noodling.Perfect comparison. I have and like the BV25M,can recomend.
Hi, you need to compare the same riff with each speaker immediately after the previous speaker. When you play clean and dirty and then switch speakers a person has a hard time remembering what the prior speaker sounded like.
@@mojotoneofficial Thank you for the reply. Watching RUclips through Roku you don't see the time codes so thank you for the heads up. Now a person can properly compare the speakers!
Dude, the clip is time stamped and labeled; you can scroll right to the tones you want to compare. All clean, all dirty, a specific speaker to another, whatever you want, easy.
Thanks for getting back to me. I now know that there are time codes but as I stated, watching through Roku you don't see the time codes and I have noticed through the comments that there are other people that had the same suggestions as to the grouping of the sound samples.
I have a quick question for you guys. I have the M, the H and the V. For my medium magnet speakers I use the M and an M creamback. The V and H are my heavy magnet speakers. I don't use a 4x12 though; I use two 2x12s with the M & H paired up for more vintage stuff and the Creamback and V paired up for higher gain. Usually all four are going though. Anyway my question is that, like the Creamback, I was under the impression from the frequency response graph, that the sensitivity of the M was 97 just like the Creamback, and the heavy magnet drivers also matched at around 100. But there are a few places, here ^ included, which say the efficiency of the M is actually 99 -- just like with the Creamback. So I've sent them a question asking which it is, and now I pose the same to you. I know it's somewhat arbitrary since it's a mean, nominal value that could simply indicate higher extension and no more . . . but unfortunately I'm a hifi guy, and we thrive on these figures.
I can hear a pretty big difference in the 'SP' and 'V' versions of the above speakers, which I assume are some of Mojotone's aged cones. They are smoother with less high end frequencies. In this video capture, I personally prefer the regular versions, especially that BV30H - what a great sounding speaker. I suppose if you had a super bright or edgy amp you were pairing with, the aged cones could work well.
Check out the gear used for the comparison video in the description.
Timecodes:
00:00 - Anthem Clean Tone
00:24 - Anthem Dirty Tone
00:49 - BV25M Clean Tone
01:14 - BV25M Dirty Tone
01:39 - BV25M-SP Clean Tone
02:04 - BV25M-SP Dirty Tone
02:29 - BV30H Clean Tone
02:54 - BV30H Dirty Tone
03:19 - BV30V Clean Tone
03:44 - BV30V Dirty Tone
04:09 - Greyhound Clean Tone
04:34 - Greyhound Dirty Tone
04:58 - Watchtower Clean Tone
05:23 - Watchtower Dirty Tone
How a speaker demo should be done.Back to back,same riff,you always know which speaker is playing,easy to skip around,no random blues noodling.Perfect comparison. I have and like the BV25M,can recomend.
That BV30H is sweet. Great alternative to the big C's speakers
That was one of the best produced demo videos I’ve ever seen.
Anthem 12" is a great sounding speaker!
Gotta go high gain to really see the difference
Hi, you need to compare the same riff with each speaker immediately after the previous speaker. When you play clean and dirty and then switch speakers a person has a hard time remembering what the prior speaker sounded like.
Thanks for the feedback, please use the times codes or chapters provided to switch back in forth to each speaker you want listen.
@@mojotoneofficial Thank you for the reply. Watching RUclips through Roku you don't see the time codes so thank you for the heads up. Now a person can properly compare the speakers!
Dude, the clip is time stamped and labeled; you can scroll right to the tones you want to compare. All clean, all dirty, a specific speaker to another, whatever you want, easy.
Thanks for getting back to me. I now know that there are time codes but as I stated, watching through Roku you don't see the time codes and I have noticed through the comments that there are other people that had the same suggestions as to the grouping of the sound samples.
how about clean tones first, then the dirty ones? This way you dont scramble the listener to much. anyhow, great sounding speakers!
Use the markings in the player, easy.
They all sound really good. You guys hit it out of the park.
So this says the BV25M is 99dB Efficient but on the Mojo site it is listed as 97dB? Which is right?
The site listing is correct the BV25M is 97db, thanks
Thanks
🔊Well done👊🏻
I have a quick question for you guys. I have the M, the H and the V. For my medium magnet speakers I use the M and an M creamback. The V and H are my heavy magnet speakers. I don't use a 4x12 though; I use two 2x12s with the M & H paired up for more vintage stuff and the Creamback and V paired up for higher gain. Usually all four are going though. Anyway my question is that, like the Creamback, I was under the impression from the frequency response graph, that the sensitivity of the M was 97 just like the Creamback, and the heavy magnet drivers also matched at around 100. But there are a few places, here ^ included, which say the efficiency of the M is actually 99 -- just like with the Creamback. So I've sent them a question asking which it is, and now I pose the same to you. I know it's somewhat arbitrary since it's a mean, nominal value that could simply indicate higher extension and no more . . . but unfortunately I'm a hifi guy, and we thrive on these figures.
Nicely done. I have a good inkling about which speakers would likely work well in my different amps.
The BV 25M, according to the web site , is 97db, not 99db……..just sayin’!
I would like to hear more examples of clean, crunchy, and overdriven tones. Some lead to get a better idea of what these soeakers do.
a comment for the RUclips metrics
a reply for the RUclips metrics
Yeah,I think of all the speaker manufacturers,mojotone has nailed the vintage celestion sound.
Man, that Anthem is really doing it for me.
Greyhound or Anthem 🤔
Awesome! I like the 25M and the 30H the best here 🥸
I’m excited to try some of these to upgrade my Fender Champ 100 and my Marshall code 25…. I’m tore between the British vintage and the greyhounds!
Let us know how it goes!
Does the aged cone you guys offer make a drastic difference?
I figure they both end up aged after you play them a while.
I can hear a pretty big difference in the 'SP' and 'V' versions of the above speakers, which I assume are some of Mojotone's aged cones. They are smoother with less high end frequencies. In this video capture, I personally prefer the regular versions, especially that BV30H - what a great sounding speaker. I suppose if you had a super bright or edgy amp you were pairing with, the aged cones could work well.
bv30v - nice and clear
Awesome thank you
Bv25 1:15
WT 5:24
👍👍