I would love if you could do a rationale of how you came yo develop that build? What trial and error did you go through to come to these numbers? Thanks
once you know the type of car you're building (in this case a high-powered FR) and if you analyze his other builds, they follow a similar formula based on FR/MR/AWD. in this case, this follows his FR build approach of 35/45 for compression/expansion; natural frequency in the 2.6-2.9 range, camber in the 1.8-2.4 range, low tow angle, and initial torque that's generally consistent with 10/15/15. then you experiment off of those initial starting points.
@ what I mean is from that template. Let’s say it’ all thrown together but it’s still off. I want to know what is off and what he’s going to change first and why.
Because on the nurburgring with gt7s wonky physics it tends to make the car act weird on steep inclines. id also have to raise the car even more, which people dont really like looks wise.
10/10
I would love if you could do a rationale of how you came yo develop that build? What trial and error did you go through to come to these numbers? Thanks
once you know the type of car you're building (in this case a high-powered FR) and if you analyze his other builds, they follow a similar formula based on FR/MR/AWD. in this case, this follows his FR build approach of 35/45 for compression/expansion; natural frequency in the 2.6-2.9 range, camber in the 1.8-2.4 range, low tow angle, and initial torque that's generally consistent with 10/15/15. then you experiment off of those initial starting points.
@ what I mean is from that template. Let’s say it’ all thrown together but it’s still off. I want to know what is off and what he’s going to change first and why.
Why wide body if you don’t wide track to go along with it?
Because on the nurburgring with gt7s wonky physics it tends to make the car act weird on steep inclines. id also have to raise the car even more, which people dont really like looks wise.