Using a scissors or "nutcracker" move to control or cause pain submission is risky against a powerful aggressive attacker. For one thing, if he doesn't submit, you've just tied up both your hands and your baton while he has at least one arm free. In my experience, aggressive people don't just give up when you give them pain. They fight harder.
VTSifuSteve t It’s less about pain compliance and more about the leverage created., which is significant . Techniques like ude garame use two hands , as do most chokes . This vice .is a commonly used technique in law enforcement. I personally have used the empty handed variation which has less leverage a number of times against very motivated and resistant subjects and it worked perfectly for me., for car and bathroom extractions, to break grips etc.
@@Combatprofessor Thanks for responding! Yes, I can absolutely see the value of this in law enforcement. Less so for me personally. I'm not an LEO, I'm on the small side at 5'8" and I'm in my mid 60s now. I have trained this kind of material, and yeah, I wrestled when I was in high school. But these days, I prefer not getting in so close with someone who is probably bigger, younger, stronger, and faster. So, the context is different. And context is everything.
VTSifuSteve absolutely understood . I’m 6’2” and still wouldn’t prioritize restraint unless it was absolutely required by the job or rare circumstances.
Using a scissors or "nutcracker" move to control or cause pain submission is risky against a powerful aggressive attacker. For one thing, if he doesn't submit, you've just tied up both your hands and your baton while he has at least one arm free. In my experience, aggressive people don't just give up when you give them pain. They fight harder.
VTSifuSteve t It’s less about pain compliance and more about the leverage created., which is significant . Techniques like ude garame use two hands , as do most chokes . This vice .is a commonly used technique in law enforcement. I personally have used the empty handed variation which has less leverage a number of times against very motivated and resistant subjects and it worked perfectly for me., for car and bathroom extractions, to break grips etc.
@@Combatprofessor Thanks for responding! Yes, I can absolutely see the value of this in law enforcement. Less so for me personally. I'm not an LEO, I'm on the small side at 5'8" and I'm in my mid 60s now. I have trained this kind of material, and yeah, I wrestled when I was in high school. But these days, I prefer not getting in so close with someone who is probably bigger, younger, stronger, and faster. So, the context is different. And context is everything.
VTSifuSteve absolutely understood . I’m 6’2” and still wouldn’t prioritize restraint unless it was absolutely required by the job or rare circumstances.
good teacher👊🏾
This is excellent
New video