"Fighter JETS"?!? P-38 is a prop. The examples and the text has a lot of errors (e.g. F15 is multirole, not a intercepter). SR-71 is not a "fighter"; YF-12 was.
There's a lot of overlap and a few of the examples don't belong to the "Fighter" category. The F-104 never saw service as a fighter-bomber. The F-111 would be more accurate for that category. The all weather and recon examples should not be included as "fighter" aircraft. The SR-71 was never designed for that role, it was purely reconnaissance spy plane. Military jet is fine as a broad category here.
Sorry but im only 2m in and you've totally lost it......light fighters have never been labeled stealthy and turbo props are not jets! the sr-71 was reconnaissance only and was never ever a fighter!? 🙈
The Luftwaffe used the F-104 for "toss bombing" nuclear weapons. It was originally designed as a fair weather interceptor. Climb like a scalded cat (sorry Cleo), make a few gun/missile passes (slash & dash or boom & zoom)then haul ass back to base. In that role, the 104 set the standard.
Never heard of a "strategic" fighters before today and generally all of them seems invented: F-15 is NOT an interceptor and F-104 is used as a fighter bomber only in G version, previous are light fighters and the S is an interceptors. And all generally reeks of american exceptionalism and chauvinism, not a single example that's is taken from another country. No mirages, No MiGs or Sukhoi, no Fockle-Wulf or Messerschmitt, no Bae Harrier, no Saab, no Mitsubishi or Nakaijma. No Caccia, no Frontal Aviation, No PVO, no Zerstozers and not even planes from the US Navy.
Not sure where you're from, but you definitely need better sources of information....had to turn it off when you actually said the F-5 incorporated stealth technology...I literally could feel my IQ dropping!
The SR-71 is not a fighter in any form or way.. Same with the F-117, it's a bomber!
True.....Sr 71 is for reconnaissance
The “F” designation of the F-117 is quite an interesting piece to look up on Wikipedia, really hadn’t crossed my mind before
@@Sleepysod thanks. Just read it.
Yf-12a fighter interceptor version would have been a better choice
She clearly never said it was a fighter plane, learn to listen, you ridiculous nonsense.
Most of these designations are historical. Modern air forces have focused on the merged multirole/strategic fighter
"Fighter JETS"?!? P-38 is a prop. The examples and the text has a lot of errors (e.g. F15 is multirole, not a intercepter). SR-71 is not a "fighter"; YF-12 was.
P was for pursuit. Now, it is patrol
Isn’t the F-15 an air superiority fighter?
@@HarryKaemerle It's got the rap sheet to prove it.
Hello there Kim, how are you doing? I'm so glad that your voice sounds perfect again because it's so beautiful and calm.
There's a lot of overlap and a few of the examples don't belong to the "Fighter" category. The F-104 never saw service as a fighter-bomber. The F-111 would be more accurate for that category. The all weather and recon examples should not be included as "fighter" aircraft. The SR-71 was never designed for that role, it was purely reconnaissance spy plane. Military jet is fine as a broad category here.
This video is trash, but the YF12 was an interceptor version of the SR71, it didn't go into service but a few were made and flown
The F15 is the most successful air superiority fighter ever. It is not an interceptor. An interceptor would be a Mirage III.
F104
SR 71 is not a fighter jet
You are right but the sr 71 had a fighter version the a12
The best Fight Bomber was the F-111 Ardvark.... There isn't such a thing as Reconnaissance fighter
Many of the above are not fighter, replace the word with "jet" pls
Talking about the p38 in wwII being shot down by surface to air missles that didn't exist yet
F-104 was an interceptor with very limited ordnance carrying capabilities.
how about Su-35, Su-57, Su-34, also Rafale, and Eurofighter Typhoon ,Tornado, and Gripen ???
and certanly Su-30MKI from India and Russia ??
SR71 was not a fighter. It was reconnaissance only.
The f104 was not a fighter bomber, it was a interceptor
F15 and f14 are multi role fighters, not dedicated interceptors.
Sorry but im only 2m in and you've totally lost it......light fighters have never been labeled stealthy and turbo props are not jets! the sr-71 was reconnaissance only and was never ever a fighter!? 🙈
F104 was not a fighter bomber aircraft
Not really, but it was used for CAS in Vietnam at times.
@@nish221100 yeah I guess as it was also used to strike enemy airfield in 1971 war
The Luftwaffe used the F-104 for "toss bombing" nuclear weapons. It was originally designed as a fair weather interceptor. Climb like a scalded cat (sorry Cleo), make a few gun/missile passes (slash & dash or boom & zoom)then haul ass back to base. In that role, the 104 set the standard.
p-38 a jet fighter?😲
Never heard of a "strategic" fighters before today and generally all of them seems invented: F-15 is NOT an interceptor and F-104 is used as a fighter bomber only in G version, previous are light fighters and the S is an interceptors.
And all generally reeks of american exceptionalism and chauvinism, not a single example that's is taken from another country.
No mirages, No MiGs or Sukhoi, no Fockle-Wulf or Messerschmitt, no Bae Harrier, no Saab, no Mitsubishi or Nakaijma.
No Caccia, no Frontal Aviation, No PVO, no Zerstozers and not even planes from the US Navy.
Yikes. Couldn’t make it passed the 3:49 mark.
Seems like these buzz videos are just some high school kids school project posted on RUclips.
Not sure where you're from, but you definitely need better sources of information....had to turn it off when you actually said the F-5 incorporated stealth technology...I literally could feel my IQ dropping!
To the buzz every aircraft is a fighter. Total ignorance.
On would thing the mig 31 would be a better example,of a,pure interceptor than the f15. Just illustrates the bias of this,propaganda channel.
👍👍👍❤❤❤✈✈✈
What a load of absolute bollocks!
Title: The 9 different types of fighters explained
Video: uS hAs tHe mOst pOWerFul aiRCrAfTs 🤡🤓🤓🏳️🌈🇺🇸
What did you want to see there?
@@Alex-0908 Anything but not the US bias
the buzz the best in the world
i like them but they are incorrect often, the sr 71 and 117 are not fighter jets
Stupid story ....