5 Guitar Shapes You'll Want to Avoid at All Costs - My Ultimate Hate List!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- Get yourself 7% off your first annual subscription to DistroKid with my VIP Link:
DistroKid - distrokid.com/vip/jamieslays
🌟 My affiliate links
zez.am/jamieslaysofficial
📱 Why not follow my Social channels?
» Instagram | / jamieslaysofficial
» Facebook | / jamieslaysuk
» Twitter | / jamieslaysuk
Check out what I like on Andertons
» tinyurl.com/2p8xdbvh
Check out my covers & Original music!
🎧» Spotify - open.spotify.com/artist/3yDHi...
🎵» Apple Music - itunes.apple.com/us/artist/ja...
🎸 Want To Jam Along? Check out my Backing Tracks on Patreon!
» / jamieslaysuk
🎸 Want to CHUG like me? Buy my signature guitar pickups!
» www.legendarypickups.co.uk/?r...
👕 Buy A T-Shirt 👕 | jamieslays.com/shop
You've watched the videos & seen the store, now join the Jamie Slays Family with exclusive, official merchandise! 
Видеоклипы
Clarification for Jackson: Dinky is bolt-on, Soloist is neck-thru. Rest of features are interchangeable and more-or-less the same i.e headstock, fret count, bridge style, etc.
Yep, people get confused by the Dinky name, but both the Dinky and the Soloists bodies are 7/8th the size of a standard strat which is where the dinky name comes from but it applies to both the soloist and dinky.
@@Andrew_182 soloist is a normal strat size. Dinky is the small one
Bellamy
Common misconception, but no, both are 7/8th size. Can be confirmed with google or by comparing both side by side or vs a strat. Again, the only real difference between a dinky and a soloist is bolt on vs neck through respectively.
@@Andrew_182 Exactly. I don’t know if the site says it now, but the Dinky was previously described as 7/8 size because it was being compared directly to a strat, but less traditional. The soloist I don’t recall having that specific description like the Dinky, but that’s cause it wasn’t being directly compared. I think that’s where people get that mix-up cause Dinky said 7/8 but Soloist didn’t, so they assume Dinky is smaller than Soloist.
The Dinky is 7/8 the size of the original soloist body size, the soloist body is now slightly smaller han it originally was in the 80s and early 90s
The rhoads V is comfortable to sit and play. The short leg on the bottom sits on your chair and the guitar is in classical position. Very comfortable and ergonomic.
King V all the way for me
Got a JS32T and its great for me
I really wanted to like my Rhoads V, but I just couldn’t get comfortable playing it either stood or seated (and I play classical position on all guitars when seated regardless of shape). I ended up selling it and putting the money towards a Schecter Strat style guitar instead.
I had the same opinion about the Les Paul's, originally hated them for all the same reasons but liked them at the same time. Bought a Epiphone Les Paul because I needed a E-Standard machine and fell in love with it because all of the reasons I hated it before. It's a love-hate relationship yes, but it so different from my other two main guitars (A Jackson Soloist and a Ibanez RG) that sometimes playing it creates a breath of fresh air.
Same here , I originally thought the same thing... PS I also have an RG and a Schecter which I still like better than the LP....
LPs are frustrating to thrash on, but if you're in the mood for slow sludge and doom, nothing is better. Buzzo and Pike get some wicked tones out of them.
I always hated them too until I got an agile baritone. I put a pair of Duncan's in it and I love it now. It's my favorite guitar.
I just got an Epi Les paul and mind that I'm a telecaster player. So how do i feel about it? I absolutely love it. It has totally different feel to offer. I play heavy metal on it, love it for the way it is. Don't want to change it. Les paul should feel like a les paul not a tele or strat or any other guitar.
Same. Tried to play a Gibson LP the other day and despised it. Ordered a Epiphone LP Prophecy and I cannot put it down. I learned on a LP and got away from them but I'm really happy I ordered another one.
I have never played a flying-v, but I have always wanted one. Alexi Laiho is responsible for my love for them, and so his flying-v shape is, without a doubt, my favorite alongside the Jackson Kelly.
Theyre comfortable if you sit with them correctly
Don't get a Gibson if you get a v get an Edwards Alexi laiho sig. better quality than ltd but similar price to ltd
They’re actually really ergonomic if you sit in classical position. No horn to get in the way of upper fret access, they have a balanced weight, it locks into your legs when sitting down so you don’t need to worry about the guitar sliding around, and if you get a symmetrical one, no neck dive. With the Rhoads style V’s, those do have some neck dive.
@@IllusionaryFuneral thats why you have a good thick strap or a well balanced V and most round horn Vs are balanced
@@lordsludge5678 Exactly, that’s why to me, it’s a non-issue about the Rhoads Vs. I have an LTD Arrow that I’m head over heels for, even after almost 2 years of owning it.
I also hated headless for a while. Then I played one. Then I bought one. Then I bought another two... now I hate headstocks. Self fulfilling prophecy somewhere in there probably. Remarkably easy instruments to live with!
Headstocks my favorite part of the guitar.
I disagree I don't like them. I prefer reverse pointy headstocks. They look better and it gives the guitwr some character. Headless guitars just ain't for me. They're also uncomfortable to play with too. Especially for palm muting.
I know they have tuning stability benefits, but I play Tele's anyway and they are stable AF anyway. But to me I associate them with shit 80's Yuppie Pop bands (Hohner headless bass is the main culprit), so to me they have always been a joke.
I find them ugly, but then I'm an odd ball as I use SIngle Coil Tele's to play Modern Metal (they are surprisingly good for Metal btw) so I dont expect anyone to listen to what I say Hahahaha
@@jacksmith4460 I used to think of them in the same way because of the old Steinbergers and those weird Klein guitars lol. Now I honestly associate them with tech death the most. Funny enough the headless I'm maining right now is a Kiesel Zeus, which is basically a contoured Tele body!
@@TYLERtheMAGGOT1 Which particular headless guitar did you try? Have tried a Strandberg and it didn't interfere with my palm muting at all, felt great to play even
I love explorers because of James! I got his Snakebyte and it has such a phenomenal presence!
Been playing an EBMM Majesty 7 for about 7 years, and thought I wanted to hurl every time I looked at a Strandberg. Realized a few months ago that I wanted an 8 string, and decided to "get over" the look of the Strandberg and give it a whack. Probably one of the most pleasant surprises I have had in a guitar in forever. I hate to say it, but the EBMM has been sitting mostly in the case since. Strand is a solid instrument, and massively playable. Planning on purchasing a 7 soon just for the fun of it.
I am working on getting someone's Les Paul up to snuff now. It is really nice. They're a dividing one. I would recommend an ESP Eclipse over Gibson though.
I was just looking at a picture of a Les Paul style guitar and thought it'd be nice to check one out
I really like the idea of two volumes and a 3 way switch (Can use it to make a killswitch style sounds, or to change from fat bridge to neck tone during a solo, or from mellow and quiet neck pickup to a bridge pickup with ten volume), but i see how it could be not everyone's cup of tea
I reeeeeeally want to try out an Aristides 7 string, I've heard nothing but good things (but also don't want to spend 2-3 months worth of rent on one)
I want to buy a used one that someone prorated by smashing on the ground
Its one of those days just found out my extra set of D activator’s won’t work for a new single cut with a Floyd i picked up. It’s A great axe but it just needs some ballz any ideas? I thought about buying a set of StuMac gold solid covers but idk if the pole pieces not lining up will hurt the tone big time? Wish i had a set of gold Fishman’s to throw in but i don’t 😂 ps love the tone of your Signature set! Great job.
Good points! I recently bought a headless strandberg-clone (NK), and love it.
The points you make do sense, as some models just "end" at the nut without warning. Others are a bit thicker at the top, where you'd expect your headstock to be, and it's comfortable resting my thumb against. One of the points it seems to solve as well, is no need anymore for foam behind the bridge or the nut, as there's just very little string there. But yeah, tuning is fiddly.
Les Paul Modern. Slim compound neck, lighter can coil tap. Might change your mind.
Thought I wouldn’t like a headless guitar. But then I tried one and it was ridiculously comfortable (for me). I never rest anything behind the nut, so that’s not an issue for me. Maybe one day I’ll buy one. I agree it looks a bit silly tough.
I personally "hate" anything Strat shaped and modern variation (RG, RGA, RGD, Soloists, Dinky, etc.) of it, never got along with them when standing, they just don't sit at the right angle and I can't make them do so, without constantly readjusting.
Prefer my neck to be at about a 45° angle, probably because I only play in classical position while sitting, which puts the neck at that angle.
My favourite guitars are those that naturally want to hang like that:
Flying Vs, Explorers, SGs, Les Pauls, Dean MLs
The thing also with strat types is that they are so utterly fuckin typical and monotonous. Especially in the extended range. We need more fun and ergo designs.
So get better then
@@Trahzy ?
I love my Steinberger. It is comfortable and easily transported. However, my Jackson Dinky is my favorite of all the guitars I own.
on 25.5 scale 7 strings... I've seen a number of comments saying a 25.5 scale 7 string is "pointless" and you "need" a longer scale length for the low B... Meshuggah didn't seem to mind using Ibanez Universes in A# standard for like 15 years
I own a 25.5 LTD M-1007ht, I keep it in A# standard and it sounds incredible - cleans and all.
Even using a 59, my low A 7th string has a ton of clarity especially with the active pups.
Extended range isn't a necessity unless you're going wayyy down, not a half to full step, imo..
25,5 is perfectly fine for B standard, and is good enough for drop A. But i can understand needing a longer scale when going even lower than that
One of my basses is a headless multiscale, and man..playing it was a revelation. That loss of ~8" off the end makes it balance so much better, and makes it way more physically maneuverable when moving around. It's a 35" scale and it fits in a guitar gig bag. It's a 6 string bass, and weighs just under 8 pounds, and definitely doesn't feel like a toy. I love it.
Yep ive got a strandberg guitar and the balance is just gorgeous and not too bad to tune either
Do you prefer wide or narrow necks? 42mm or 43mm nuts?
2:30 they were meant for the classical/jazz position when sitting.
LOVE UR VIDEOS JAMIE!
The Solar looks gorgeous!
Always played Ibanez RG's myself.I owned a Prestige and sadly i had to sell it a few years ago.
But,i also own a Sterling JP7 and i love how it plays.
Yeah ...
MM Sterling in my opinion is one of the most ugly looking guitar. But, it feels good to play. Borrowed my friend JP 60 sometimes ago and ever intended to give it back, LOL.
Always been a Ibanez guy. I have a 7 string Iron label with Bareknuckle pickups i like a lot. Recently bought my first Solar guitar and im definitely impressed by how it sounds in studio and how it feels for the price point. The stock pickups on my Solar definitely stand up to the big boys.
I can't get behind most extended range guitars that I have played. But 10 STRINGS!!!! Yeah, most of the points on your list I can relate to. I always thought the Dean Split-V looked like a guitar that is waving with one hand at the customers ( *hey, hey... pick me!* )
I merely like 7 string guitars (like my Schecter)... They feel like a solid and reliable jeep when setup correctly.
Meanwhile, a good 6 string guitar feels like a formula-one racecar/F-16 in comparison. String gauge, action and scale length are built for virtuosity that is somewhat attainable to the blue collar musician. Jeeps are solid, but no landspeed records are gonna be broken.
Maybe it's me, I have yet to find a 7 string that feels as sleek, slick, comfy and speedy as an old fashioned super-strat (like my Charvel So-Cal).
I really like the Ibanez JPM100 and the Ibanez H.R. Giger Models. Plus a big fan of the Solar's
Are the E-2’s really that much better than ltd’s? I own an Ltd and its a great guitar, but I’ve never had the chance to see an E2 in person.
I own some of both ranges. The LTD1000 are great value workhouse guitars that can def hold up to professional gigging standards but never received one that was “perfect” and you’ll get some that need a bit of work to get there. ESP/E-II are basically perfectly setup from factory and have a more “solid” build that I’ve never felt on any LTD. I never have to adjust the truss on my ESP/E-IIs but I do occasionally on my LTDs for instance. 2x better? Nah but I’d say it’s like 1.4x better. Get a lightly used one and save some cash. Plus you get a nice case that normally goes for like $250.
@@solidus317 thanks for the reply, cause that’s good to know that you get your money’s worth with the E-2’s. Looks like I’ll have to break down and get the one I’ve been eyeing for a while on the internet, thanks again.
Just wanna ask have you ever played a Ibanez q they are really comfortable and light
Believe it or not I have felt this way about generally every Ibanez I have played. Super popular guitars and good quality but not a single one has felt right in my hands.
My second guitar ever was a Jackson flying-v with a floyd rose that I got all because of Alexi Laiho and I absolutely love them now. Sitting down I prefer a ST style body but standing up I always go for flying-v's. Current dream guitars are Alexi's pink sawtooth and ripped sawtooth :P
On your first guitar, what are your thoughts about the Solar G-Series? I know they still have the pickup selector at the top, which I also find clunky and uncomfortable, but I feel like it addresses most of your other issues with LP style guitars.
I’ll never not recommend a Solar to anyone
Great video Jamie!
I'm of the mind that if you want that super low sound, just use a seven-string and a Drop pedal. Drop pedals get better every year, the latency is basically a non-issue at this point.
The Dean Cadillac, however, is a Les Paul/Explorer cross that actually looks really good. Plays really nice.
Its the first time i see someone saying that the dean cadillac looks good
What about telecaster and jazzmaster shape guitars?
Are solar guitars really good, thinking of buying one, but a v shape, never owned a v shape before
Ibanez RG’s are my favorite ones on your list. To them, I would add the Ted McCarty PRS series and, of course, the good old fashion Fender Strat. Someday, I would like to try out a Gretsch and a Tele.
My biggest concern. The output jack HAS to be on the top of the body like an Ml or Sg which seriously narrows down my options. I now drill and wire the output jack on all my guitars on the top of all my guitars.
A Flying V is super comfortable to play sitting or standing. As long as you aren't trying to slouch on the couch with it, you'd be fine.
Cool video Jamie 😊
Hey mate! 👋😂 Yeah I agree with most of this, I'm the same. As pleasing as it is to buy signature models of your favourite guitar players when you're a kid or just starting out, people need to TRY to put the love of the instrument in general first, over the love of their favourite musician in my honest opinion, because it's only going to hinder progress and potentially cause frustration if they don't feel comfortable playing but can't figure out why, then obviously leading to them giving up. We've all done it though hey!(Dime sigs)🤣.
Don't feel bad though for not liking Gibson dude, I HATE sitting down playing my Les Paul, it's one of the worst designed bodies out there in terms of balance, I have to literally hold onto it as I play or else it wants to fall off my right leg!
I like the steinberger headless spirit guitars. If there is no headstock there should be no body either.
I have an Ibanez iron label RGIM8MH, tis enjoyable to play on. I like your selection of guitars you like. That solar is a beaut
I have the Harley Benton Amarok (Emerald Green Quilt, YEAH YEAH!), which is very similar to that Iron Label Ibanez. I also love my Warlock NJ Korean (poor thing needs some work, though) and Jackson RR3.
I own that Headless Ibanez the Q54. I got it because it is quite a bit smaller than a normal guitar. I find myself going to hotels a lot for work and with its small size and light weight, its perfect for taking along with me and thats the reason i bought it :)
never been a fan of the super thin Ibanez Wizard style necks, I have bigger hands and they’re super uncomfortable to play for any longer period of time. Medium C necks like the Gibson 59 reissues, Charvel, even the baseball bat necks seem so much easier to play.
Have you ever tried a chambered Les Paul? It really makes a huge difference as far as weight goes...friend of mine has a Buckethead signature and it feels like a feather compared to my BFG LP
I love my zebra wood Jackson Soloist so this video made me very happy!! Stay cool Jamie!!!!
i cant belive that every remark jamie said like its extracted from my brain. same issues i have with same guitars. keep it up J.S.
Your thought on the FTM33-WK Ibanez?
For me it would be:
1. Any guitar with more than 6 strings. You say 10 is getting absurd? It got silly a long time ago.
2. Super-strats - why have two humbuckers and only 1 master volume and 1 tone. Limiting.
3. Pointy guitars - Jackson V, BC Rich Warlock/etc. good if you’re a 16 year old - not so great anytime afterwards.
4. PRS - is it a strat or a Les Paul? And birds!? Might as well have put squirrels on the fret board.
5. Anything with a floyd on it.
Is jackson good?
I expected more of a list like, Danelectro anything, Rickenbacker anything, Gibson Anything, Resonator guitars and 6 string Banjo's. Yours was a strange list.
I had this mate who used to idolise Dimebag in the '90s and into the '00s. He had this fucking awful purple cheapo strat copy, and one day he came into some money, I think inheritance or something and decided to upgrade to his dream guitar.
He put an order in with Dean to get one of the Dimebag Explorer-esque signature models, us living in the middle of Yorkshire, God-knows what he paid to have one shipped out... But when it turned up? Shitty purple Dean strat copy. I shit you not, same white pickguard, same cheap white pots, same cheap white-tipped selector switch, literally the SAME shade of purple gloss. He'd had this guitar shipped over that took weeks to arrive, paid ten times the price of his old guitar, and as the 2 of them were side-by-side, the only difference was the name on the headstock.
Worst thing is, I think because of the whole ordeal and rigmarole surrounding ordering the thing, having it shipped out and the prospect of an overseas return and refund... the dude just _owned it_ and changed his tune to "dunno what you're talking about, this IS the one I wanted."
That's the guitar I'd NEVER buy. The one that doesn't look or play better than a shit-branded strat, yet costs 10x the price.
So... basically _most_ strats.
If you want to play a V type sitting down screw on a Steinberger flip out leg rest (as featured on the cricket bat/travel guitar/bass). Does the job, minimal fuss.
James hetfield changed the position of the toggle and there is only one volume...the eclipse is the perfect single cut imo
James primarily plays ESP, not LP. They look similar but feel very different. I have 2 LPs and 3 ESP (LTD) including the white one in his pic. You may like the weight and feel. 3 knobs and selector is where an LPs 4rh knob would be. Selector on upper bout is a dummy one.
Ibanez GIO series is my main guitar . Cheap but damn good and durable.
A good beginner guitar👍
Any Les Paul is the only one that comes to mind for me. Not a fan of anything with a carved top either really, I like a flat top with an arm carve mainly. That blonde solar reminds me of the Ibanez RG30 30th anniversary guitar that came out a few years ago.
The Jackson Dinky is not shorter scale length....... Where did you get that from?
The few times you find Jackson Dinkys with shorter scale length is the FUSION models from the 90s, and some other odd variations.
I have an RG prestige and a Solar A1.6 (neck thru) and I super agree with your descriptions (esp with their necks) and that Solar is a great combination of the 3 you mentioned. I find myself playing my Solar maybe more than my RG. It plays insanely well and isn't super thin like ibanez (wizard III?)
Wizard III is what they use on their more budget friendly Indo made guitars. If you have a prestige like you say(Japan) then it’s a Prestige Wizard/Super Wizard. Yes there is quite a difference.
@@solidus317 ye it’s Japanese made/prestige just couldn’t remember. Indeed super wizard
I got a chance to try a headless not too long ago from legator. I would have enjoyed it if the guitar was in tune and had better pick-ups. I hope that isn't representative of all other headless guitars.
im not a massive Les Paul fan,only tried 1 V wasnt keen,but need to try some Jackson ones
Here's my thing, I own a Les Paul and love the finish and the tone from it... When I bother to play it 😂 it is heavy, it doesn't really sit well when trying to play it.. I often play the SG more simply because the neck is thinner,Its lighter and can generally play a bit faster on it.. I still Don tay that as much as I probably should!.. Also fair ay for busting some moves with The Captain 🤘
Exactly!! Thank you mate xxxx
@DEEZ LIKES the super-breakable detuning headstock is one of the worst design flaws though. Ye may not like PRS but they did solve that one.
Dude! Love your display of funko pops!!!
You should google the Jackson Concorde, because it seems like you're misspeaking. Concorde was a bigger shape and it is a prototype that Randy didn't like, because he was a short dude yet frankly the guitar was quite bulky. So Jackson went back to work on his signature guitar and later made the design and shape we've know for decades as the RR.
Jackson did made some Concorde shape models like the original prototype a few years ago though.
Yeh I’ve played the Concorde. They sent me one a few years back. I don’t understand what you’re referring to?
@@JamieSlays I just saw the Concorde on Mr. Crowley live 1981 in the background. It's a different guitar from nowadays' Jackson RR, I think you're confusing those guitars.
@@ShadowBannedagain yeh they are. I know that. I still don’t understand? Lol Randy rhodes did originally play a concordealso
I say Randy Rhodes, concorde shape. I should have said AND In between
Can you tell us what the background songs were??
My songs cursed ritual aella and Goliath rises They’re on Apple Music and Spotify
@@JamieSlays love you and your channel dude. Been watching since 2018. I know I'm a little late to the table but your video with the Mezzabarba drop B riffs (along with pretty much all your videos) has such amazing tone, and that one in particular got me hooked on Parkway Drive. I'll check those songs out, because I kept getting distracted by the super rad, but quiet riffs in the background haha.
@@TheHighsmith8 I loved it soo soo much. I want one
I noticed the Mario Bros coin box tin on your desk. I’ve got one of those, I keep picks and nail clippers in it.
RG stands for Roadstar Guitar. The Roadstar was Ibanez' strat shaped model up until they came up with the Jem for Steve Vai in... 1987 I think?
Love my v's! 🤘 Nice video
I was led to believe that early flying v’s had a serrated strip on the bottom edge so you could play sitting down and it wouldn’t slide off. Can anyone confirm if that was the case or did my brain just make it up?
two guitar i love, my 2017 Squire Bullet Mustang, and 2001 Epiphone Les Paul Special II and a guitar i dislike not hate because it play and sound great but only good for Chords my 1960s Vision VEG-120 the bridge can't be intonation at all
I knew a lad once who bought a ESP Viper limited edition 30th Anniversary, all black in colour ebony fretboard, set neck. Oh jesus, it were horrible to play, the neck was narrow and uncomfortable, would slowly creep out of tune with the slightest of string bends and the bridge wasn't the best, reminds me of the tune-o-matic (if that's the right name for 'em) bridges with V-shaped saddles. The only decent thing about imo was the EMG 81/85 active pups.
Took me a while to get used a heavier guitars but definitely a waayyy better experience once u get it
I really don't like the Gibson brand, am more of a Fender guy. Have DC tv model junior, J45 and a Les Paul traditional which is my absolute favorite now. I really don't want to, but sometimes I guess the guitar chooses you
It’s funny, I have had most those “dad rock” style guitars since I was a teenager. Bought my Flying V when I was 15 in 2003. They’ve been my favorites most of my life.
The worst neck dive you’ll find of any is the SG style body. The body is way too light and the neck has half the guitars overall mass.
I’ve started liking 8+ string guitars in the last 5 or so years I’ve also been enjoying Baritone’s and hollow bodies more recently.
Headless guitars are very very light and easy to play.
I’ve wanted to try out one of the Solar guitars but have other priorities in rounding out my current collection.
Still gotta pick up a Variax shurikan, and a tele some day. Been leaning towards a Kiesel headless for my next guitar though.
My favourite shapes are the V:s that Solar make and all of the jackson guitar shapes. Like les paul too, but they are so not for shred wich is what is like. Also hate all of the fender shapes, especially teles and strats. In genreral I hate bolt on necks, because they just feel and sound cheap to me.
Love to have a Solar, but like the ESP LTD mh1000 (evertune) kind of expensive
Funny story I had a friend who lived next to Parkway Drive in Byron Bay! It's funny to see how far they've come since then!
Heh, I'm not the only one who doesn't like Les Pauls and for the same reasons :)
Hi jamie! Are you on the met forums?
LP necks aren't all thick, my 2017 HP has a very thin asymmetrical neck carve, might try to give one a chance as quite a lot of metal was recorded on them. It's also possible to stand while playing, even when recording on your computer... I'm not a V guy but the Gibson is very close to the Jackson if you give one a try.
I have a RG570 Genesis, JEM V70, RG 8570Z and many others over the years, the RG platform is amazing. Definitely enjoy my M and MH series plus the KH models are the best of the bunch... I owned a USA Dinky signed by Grover in the late 80s, some Dinkys have normal and some reversed, depends on the year.
What you seem to be missing, and actually knocked the LP on it and gave the Dime a positive is multiple volume controls. Having multiple volume controls allows for quite a bit of versatility when playing live... this is why Randy played one along with his signature Jacksons, this is why Kirk's ESPs have 2 volume controls.
Planning on getting at least one Solar soon, love Ola! I would encourage you to pick up some guitars with dual volume controls, I think you may find that they can be very beneficial for certain tones when playing live!
Anyone know if there is a difference between E-II's and ESP's made in Japan? Noticed he said his ESP is made in Japan yet it didnt have an E-II logo. From my understanding ESP's from Japan are E-II's but I could be wrong.
from my understanding nowadays E-II and ESP are both made in japan but you'll get the ESP logo on custom shop hand crafted guitars, think 3000$+ price range. The E-II range didn't exist back then so every ESP made in japan had ESP written on it.
@@hac3y757 thanks for the information!
"Dinky" is actually named as such because they are 7/8 the size of the soloist.
I love the Les Paul specifically because it has 4 knobs. Nothing irks me more than a single cut with 2 or 3 knobs.
Reverse headstocks are the shit. Especially Jackson. I have a reverse dinky and it's awesome
I agree with you, Jamie, but I'm "old school," and I play on strat or super-strat style bodies. Les Paul style bodies are alrighr. Cheers, mates! 🤘
I love the les Paul for every reason you hate it lol. If you can find one, try a Les Paul Supreme. It’s completely hollow inside with a 60’s neck, which is slim taper. It’ll be right up your alley.
I also love a lot of headless guitars. They feel super solid and usually provide better tuning stability and excellent tension Balance
I agree I hate gibsons too. I hear so many youtubers rave about how great they are but when I check them our, they just don't feel great. The style is also ugly and they're too heavy. I don't like gibsons. Headless guitars are also ugly and uncomfortable to play with too
Not a 7-8 string guitar fan, only because the neck size makes my fretting hand cramp up. Don’t even get me started on those with the Floyd Rose style whammy system: it took me about two weeks (and a few dozen swear words) just to get one to take the high E string! Now, while I like the Flying V style, there’s not enough body for me to get a comfortable position for my strumming arm…plus, it looks dorky on me! 😂
Hate-floating trems, pickup rings, more then 1 or 2 pots, dot inlays. Not all dot inlays just the huge ones like fender and some ibanez have and most cheap guitars have them.
Love-direct mount pickups, inline headstock (reverse preferred), no inlays or small offset dot inlays, longer scale guitars. 27 inch scale or longer. But I still need a 25.5 scale guitar for drop c or drop b. But mostly play drop F or drop ea on my 7 and 8 strings.
Have a 9 just for a Joshua travis tribute. It's in his tuning ADADCCGG#E
I feel the same way you feel about Les Pauls for alot of the same reasons you do. I love the way they look, but I despise the way they feel. From the weight, to the tune-o-matic, to the neck thickness, and the height of the strings from the body. It's a very awkward feeling guitar like playing a slightly smaller jazz archtop, but it's fully solid, so it's heavy as a cinderblock. I really wish someone would make a LP shaped guitar that felt more like a superstrat.
You're literally describing a PRS. But I guess they have image problems...
I like the ec shape from esp more then the les Paul
I agree on every guitar you don't like. Not a fan of Dime's style though. Favorite is ESP LTD H-1001. Check them out!
Terrific video! Everything you hate about Gibson guitars, is everything I love about Gibson guitar’s! L O L as far as sitting comfort, I literally never sit when playing. I always play standing with a guitar on a strap. Keep up the good job.
RG = "Roadster (as in hotrod/convertible) Guitar" some pronounce is "Road-Star Guitar", and S = "Saber"
"proceeds to name everything i like about a les paul" me: hmmmm
The main differences in the Dinky and the soloist is the soloist is neck thru the dinky is a bolt on neck and a slightly smaller body. I used to own a Jackson Custom shop Kelly Dinky which was the same shape as the regular Kelly, but had a smaller size body and a bolt on neck, it was 3/4 the size of the original Kelly body size.
Can't believe you don't have any Kramer's on the list of one's too have? Some of the best shred machines around!
Another one is an acoustic I’m sure all my fellow metal heads will agree with me
I have the headless q52 its a dope guitar. It rarly goes out of tune
As far as Ibanez.i love the destroyer.. great take on the explorer..also like Ibanez take on the jasoson warrior cant remeber the name
Xiphos.
@@scourge34 that's it.. The warrior has a better bottom end I think it looks a little nicer than the xiphos but it's still a pretty badass guitar the iron label one that lepage uses an ego-death is really cool. I'm pretty sure it is the iron label
The only two Gibsons James plays is the Flying V and Explorer the other one is an ESP.
i.pinimg.com/originals/92/c6/83/92c683fb372adc8da86210c673939c8d.jpg