I really wanted to like the nanomorphs. There’s not a whole lot of options for RF if you want native mount. In the end I went for the Vazen 28 and 65mm amber flare RF. On the Nanomorphs I just couldn’t get past the flat one dimensional flares that look more like a streak filter and the god awful pin cushion distortion on those lenses. I think the mid-block anamorphic design on the nanomorphs also diminish the anamorphic character as well. The Vazens at 1.8x gave me a little more stretch / oval to the bokeh and much more complex but controllable flares as well. Just my opinion of course and hopefully a nanomorph V2 will address some of these things. Yes the Vazens are more money but I feel like the Vazens perform better than even the more expensive Atlas Orions and are well worth the bump in price over the Nanomorphs. If on a budget and don’t want to buy the Vazens or other alternatives I’d consider for the price of two of the nanomorphs you could save up just a little more and buy an Aivascope. The anamorphic characteristics, shaprness, flaring and flexibility to use with multiple lenses makes it a better alternative IMO.
For how it acts, I’d say it’s been added but I can see why you might think otherwise and I don’t think using grain here is good to use especially for reviews
Sometimes the likes and views from the previous video you watched glitch onto the video your current video, I’ve even seen this happen with titles and comments too.
That shot of the dog at 5:40 is magnificent
I really wanted to like the nanomorphs. There’s not a whole lot of options for RF if you want native mount. In the end I went for the Vazen 28 and 65mm amber flare RF. On the Nanomorphs I just couldn’t get past the flat one dimensional flares that look more like a streak filter and the god awful pin cushion distortion on those lenses. I think the mid-block anamorphic design on the nanomorphs also diminish the anamorphic character as well.
The Vazens at 1.8x gave me a little more stretch / oval to the bokeh and much more complex but controllable flares as well.
Just my opinion of course and hopefully a nanomorph V2 will address some of these things.
Yes the Vazens are more money but I feel like the Vazens perform better than even the more expensive Atlas Orions and are well worth the bump in price over the Nanomorphs.
If on a budget and don’t want to buy the Vazens or other alternatives I’d consider for the price of two of the nanomorphs you could save up just a little more and buy an Aivascope. The anamorphic characteristics, shaprness, flaring and flexibility to use with multiple lenses makes it a better alternative IMO.
Love coming across productive comments like this - thanks for your input/sharing your experiences on anamorphic lenses!
Are you adding noise/grain effect to your video? It actually confused me about the quality
For how it acts, I’d say it’s been added but I can see why you might think otherwise and I don’t think using grain here is good to use especially for reviews
looks like absolute shit, OP must be ignorant to the artifacts of compression
We are absolutely spoiled as content creators nowadays.
I LOOOOOOOVE shooting with anamorphic lenses!
great presentation!! ❤
Thanks great video.
The talking head portion of the video looks blurry and the sample footage looks unacceptably soft from where I'm sitting.
How does this video have 20k likes and has only been viewed 1600 times? You can buy likes on RUclips???🤔🤨
😂 There’s only 45 likes
Yeah I wish there was 20K 😂
@@mattgonzalezI took screenshots if you want to see
Sometimes the likes and views from the previous video you watched glitch onto the video your current video, I’ve even seen this happen with titles and comments too.
I think this guy channel died