Smallest Lenses for the Anamorphic Look: Laowa Nanomorph 65mm, 80mm + 1.33x Adapter

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 33

  • @stuCameraman1
    @stuCameraman1 Год назад +4

    Hey.... A tip for lining up anamorphic lenses (this might work for the laowa 2x adaptor)... Take a torch with a single LED or a phone Led light and point it into the lens... Then use the horizontal lens flare and adjust your adaptor so the lens flare sits level with the bottom or top of your frame or desqueeze black bars. I use this technique all the time with different brands of Anamorphic lenses and it works fine.... Those laowa lenses look very nice indeed🎥🙏🎥🙏🎥🙏🎥🙏🎥

  • @mdk1983
    @mdk1983 Год назад +4

    1.33x looks really tempting for any filmmaker. For those who shoot without help, the newer anamorphic with autofocus might save the day. i hope to see more autofocus versions soon🤞

    • @DamijinMyndz
      @DamijinMyndz Год назад

      Which ones are those?

    • @mdk1983
      @mdk1983 Год назад +1

      @@DamijinMyndz the V-AF cine lens from samyang are autofocus and expected to release an adapter that makes it anamorphic as well. Sirui is expected to announce their first AF anamorphic lens.

  • @exactemotion
    @exactemotion Год назад +3

    Interesting lens behavior. There is definitely a place in cinema for low lens flare and selective colors when it does. Thanks Brandon

  • @haloboy456
    @haloboy456 10 месяцев назад +1

    Did you use an APSC crop mode when using this on your A7S3?

  • @cinematools
    @cinematools Год назад +2

    The shots look amazing. I really like the portraits at Washington Square Park.

  • @LucaBono.Studio
    @LucaBono.Studio Год назад +1

    I like these clean anamorphic lenses! Thanks for the video Brandon!

  • @HenryOrtlip
    @HenryOrtlip Год назад

    Love your work as always Brandon! I have been using the Great Joy's for documentary work and the lack of flare (especially the 35) has grown on me in that genre. You have the bigger window into the story that anamorphic gives you-- but most of the tool marks (flares, coma, vignetting) aren't a distraction into the "real world" story.

  • @JammCo
    @JammCo Год назад

    The footage looks amazing. I’m itching to watch a Brandon shot feature length film.

  • @RandomMotoThings
    @RandomMotoThings 11 месяцев назад

    I’m so surprised at the results with the 1.33x adapter. Hands down the best character and stretch I’ve seen from any of these budget anamorphics. I’m surprised not many are talking about it more.
    Is the adapter that finicky to use? How is it in comparison to the aivascope in use? The aivascope was a pain in the A** imo even though the image was great.

  • @matthewwilson3673
    @matthewwilson3673 Год назад

    these lenses look amazing, great review

  • @appdata007
    @appdata007 Год назад +1

    Which anamorphic u will recommend for mid budget range solo user full frame ❤

  • @REVIEWSONTHERUN
    @REVIEWSONTHERUN Год назад

    Thanks for sharing it. ✌️

  • @KEHA14
    @KEHA14 Год назад

    This is pretty interesting actually this review of the lenses

  • @JamieHeinrich
    @JamieHeinrich 10 месяцев назад

    Great review brother

  • @grayhourproductions
    @grayhourproductions 8 дней назад

    You think these are as good as the Sirui Saturns?

  • @GuusStemerding
    @GuusStemerding Год назад

    Sick shots my guy

  • @pecherrr
    @pecherrr Год назад

    Interesting review! I tend to shoot a lot on 35mm-85mm on spherical lenses. Which one of the laowas would you recommend to cover these focal lengths?

  • @AINEET
    @AINEET Год назад

    How do they compare to the sirui night walkers?

  • @RandomMotoThings
    @RandomMotoThings 11 месяцев назад

    I’m not understanding what modes you used to shoot with these on full frame. Did you crop in post or shoot in a super35 mode?

  • @MadmooseChasenNuttall
    @MadmooseChasenNuttall Месяц назад

    What would it look like if you used these lenses with the adaptor on super 16mm film?

    • @BrandonLiUnscripted
      @BrandonLiUnscripted  Месяц назад

      Honestly I don’t know since I haven’t shot super 16, but I’d love to see the results!

  • @AndreyEvermore
    @AndreyEvermore Год назад

    Hi I love the video what would the appropriate 1.33x adapter for the lenses, I may get a 27mm

    • @BrandonLiUnscripted
      @BrandonLiUnscripted  Год назад +1

      You have to use the Laowa 1.33x adapter shown in this video because it’s made just for these lenses.

  • @SuperDickyDicky
    @SuperDickyDicky Год назад +1

    How does it perform versus the Sirui lens?

    • @NicolasWaldvogel
      @NicolasWaldvogel Год назад

      from the looks of it, they look wayyyy better imo. More anamorphic characteristics in the bokeh and edges of frame (probably mainly on full frame and with the 1.3x adapter) but most importantly much more elegant and subtle flares and less plastici/digital looking.

  • @dm.b7560
    @dm.b7560 Год назад

    How do you use your Phone as a monitor?

  • @electricdreamer
    @electricdreamer Год назад

    Do you lose any screen real estate when using Laowa on full frame cameras like FX-3?

    • @BrandonLiUnscripted
      @BrandonLiUnscripted  Год назад

      You lose the sides of your image because the de-squeezed image is wider than a 2.39 CinemaScope aspect and you need to crop in to fit.

    • @electricdreamer
      @electricdreamer Год назад

      @@BrandonLiUnscripted I see. Does that make a 4k image a little more like the size of a 1080p? Or a little larger than 1080p?

  • @BLUETICK.1M
    @BLUETICK.1M Год назад

    Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰

  • @jimmoss9584
    @jimmoss9584 5 месяцев назад

    The Sony has Super35 which would have matched the lenses better. Having 2 lenses mounted together is a recipe for problems. I have the SLR Magic 2X and it has the same problems you are pointing out. I don't see much advantage to using 2 lens groupings. A 2X lens should be just one lens for best results. The good news is that I only had to pay $350 for the SLR Magic NEW, on sale at B&H. What breaking a 2X lens into 2 parts does is let the lens manufacturer make a product that is defective and get away with it. Why would anyone want to buy a 1.33x anamorphic lens in the first place. It is harder to produce a fully functioning 2X anamorphic lens that it is to break it up into 2 lenses. You are being taken.