The a350 and 787 are NOT Competitors!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 авг 2020
- Do you prefer the 787 or a350? Let me know in the comments below!
Follow me on instagram for daily airplane quizzes, behind the scenes, and more great aviation content! / cobyexplanes
If you'd like to further support the channel, please consider checking out the Patreon community (oh, and once I hit 20 patrons I'm shaving my beard and making a video with only a mustache):
/ cobyexpl. .
Thanks so much to my "First Class" patron Vicky Bagwalla, learn more about his company Cloud Managed Networks here: cloudmanaged.ca/
Huge thanks to @FRAproductions for generously providing footage for this video. Go check out his channel for more A+ plane spotting content.
Also a huge thanks to my friends over at @PlanesWeekly for providing some incredible footage of their own. Check out some of their videos below:
• FINAL DELIVERY of a Pa...
• Incredible Sunrise Con...
• State Visit! Vietnam A...
• Close Spool Up of "Ora...
Also does anyone ever read this stuff? If so let me know by telling me a joke in the comments section (airplane jokes preferred but not required)
______________________________________________________________________________________________
I recently posted a video on why the 747-8 is a success despite slow sales. In that video, I briefly mentioned that the 787’s competitor is the a330neo. And then I started getting a whole lot of comments like these - people were insisting the 787’s real competitor was the a350.
It seems like this belief is widely held throughout the RUclips aviation community - a simple search of 787 vs a350 yields a whole lot of videos directly comparing the two. But I am here to set the record straight: The 787 and a350 are not direct competitors. Let me explain...
#Boeing787 #Airbusa350 #Boeing # Airbus 
Авто/Мото
I've flown the A350 across the pacific and returned on the 777 and I found a striking commonality between them. This video makes sense of it all. The 350 is a massive plane. It looks small from the outside due to its styling but it is massive! Cheers!
the A350 is 12 years younger built with more composites better wings and more powerful engines better fly-by-wire systems it a no brainer that why Delta and more American Airlines will pick later
Richard Reid American Airlines did not choose the a350, United and Delta airline did
Rel pretty sure United is 787 territory
Literally all variants
@@rel6438 among us carriers... there is another american airlinesthat have the a350 on order
Both of them looks beautiful in their own way.
I think the 787 is more beautiful than the a350. Those smooth curves that just flow together are incredible
Mateo Botha yessss
That's what my ex said comparing me to her current bf
Nidhin Reji that hurts. Mine is probably saying that to his new BF about me😞
Yall will hate me it's just the a350 looks better. The wings look cooler and what other airliner wears a sweet pair of shades.
The easy way for me to remember it is that the a350 replaces the a340 models, which competed with the 777ERs.
I thought the a330 originally competed with the 767?
@@maxosiatynski9987 yes and the 767 got replaced by the 787 sp now a330 is competing with 787
When the 787 was first announced there was no model number. It was written up as a B330 by many due to the obvious size similarities. This video is trying to make people realise that the upgraded A330 and the B787 are aimed at the same market.
@@maxosiatynski9987The B787 was released to compete with the A330 which had been in production for several years.
@@maxosiatynski9987 a330-200 competed with the 767-300 and the a330-300 matched up with the 777-200. The a340 variants competed with 777-ER models.
A350 vs 777
A330Neo vs 787
It's not that hard
No
Go back to the early 2000's so you'll know how the A350 came to be a competitor to the then brand new B787 on the scene at the time. "Cody" doesn't seem to mention that detail in his presentation. The A350 grew in size in time to drift into 777 territory to what people think about competing types from Boeing and AIRBUS. ORIGINALLY: 787 vs A350-800. Then the scene changed with the A350-900 and the A350-1000 even though the A350-900 was going against the B787-9 for a time until "XWB" titles started appearing with stretches of the A350 series. This column is meant for "Warp's" statement above. I meant to add: the A330 series started competing with B777s when Boeing got cleared to operate under ETOPS and in turn AIRBUS's A340s went bye and better versions of the A330 came into play against the 777 series of aircraft. A330s vs B777s. A350s vs B787s.
@@johnhenry6762 He literally did mention this in the video. DId you just not watch from 1:45?
@@GeorgeBot7 Which video- first or the second one? In your reply tell me you heard the "A350-800 " mentioned. The first or second video?!
John Henry he didnt but he did say what you said about them being originally meant to compete against each other
Actually, Coby that was very informative. And yes, I was one of those who assumed the A350 and 787 we're direct competitors. I have now changed that view. On looks alone the A350 get my vote but to be fair, I've not flown either, so I'm not exactly in a position to judge. Thanks for the video.
inspector morse the seats depend on the airline
@inspector morse do you know that different airlines have different comfort, some airlines just slap highly uncomfortable seats on their plane and call it business class while others focus in the comfort of their passengers. Tbh i prefer the 787
@@SierraDelta- nearly all airlines kit out 787 economy as a 3-3-3 when it was designed as a 2-3-2 so you can shut up
Ant as I said before the comfort depends on the airline, not Boeing ad what’s the need to be rude?
Ant the First guy said “the seats are better in the a350” so I was simply just letting him now that it’s not boeing that controls the comfort but the airline, so you cant base your review on the plane of off comfort cause the comfort is dependable on the type of airline not the plane, so now you look stupid
thank you ive been trying to tell people this for ages lol
Not the only one lol
Same dude
Me too
Same.
Aviation6 Caught cha
Anybody gonna admit that the 787 “Dreams Take Flight” livery is like, one of the most hottest liveries?
Well yeah...it only existed for one airshow then was repainted and delivered to Biman Bangladesh in their standard livery
yeah
What the heck is a livery
No
@@GomezBro this. ruclips.net/video/q0I7lku-AMc/видео.html
When I first flew on the Dreamliner, I was surprised at how ‘small’ the cabin was (in terms of seating capacity). It immediately became clear that it wasn’t an A330 competitor and in turn wasn’t an A350 competitor. Great video. Thanks for clarifying the matter.
Finally, someone agrees!!
Please go Airbus the A350 is 12 years younger built with more composites better wings and more powerful engines better fly-by-wire systems it a no brainer that why Delta and more American Airlines will pick later
@@77l96 no I am just a concerned citizen trying to put people on their guard when they choose to fly for vacation or any other thing Boeing has lost their way and they just do a thing about safety when building an aircraft so the next Airplane company is Airbus with a better reputation and safety record it is the way to go and come back alive
@@holdensv2000 lol really? Airbus also has a lots of crash records. Boeing seems dangerous only because they sell more aeroplanes. And also, an aeroplane which is younger doesn't mean it is "better". I like your comment, it is really funny, like a airbus promoter and propaganda. Aviation lover should love both Airbus and Boeing because they are really similiar nowadays.
@@holdensv2000 Also, tell you something you might refuse to listen. If Boeing break through all the issues and troubles they have right now, they gonna win this competition. You know what? Objectively, Boeing has better technology and technical ability and reserve than Airbus.
@@markchang8330 I don't know where you get that info from Boeing is in a deep hole with no way to get out and most Airlines are moving away from them they just can't be trusted no the FAA so it is the EASA and Airbus is the only way to go even China that has the biggest Airlines in the world won't want Boeing in there country so please stick a fork in it if people don't want you you are lost
I hope this satisfies those less-informed. I loved my flights on AirCanada’s 787, and would indeed love a trip on an A350 too. Published customer reviews seem to give the nod to the A350 as far as “comfort and customer experience”. Like you, I await the opportunity.
I've flown to Vancouver-Taipei roundtrip twice, once on an Air Canada 787, and once on a China Airlines A350 (same flight, too, Vancouver to Taipei). I would have to say I liked the A350 better for the most part, although it may be just me liking the airline better. However, I much prefer the windows on the 787, they are much larger and I like the dimming that still lets you kind of see out of them.
@@brandonking1737 the still being able to see out of the dimmed windows is exactly what i dont like about them, prefer blinds
Yep, with almost everybody going 9 abreast on the 787, passenger confort took a huge hit in economy.
I agree, and looking at the A350's seating capacity and the triple bogie landing gears, which is on the 777, it's obvious that the A350 is a modern competitor of the current variant of the 777 and the future variant, which has been delayed. I would say that the Boeing 787, which was originally designed to replace Boeing's 767, is a direct competitor of Airbus' A330.
That’s right! And Airbus responded to the 787 with their A330neo just to quite match its efficiency 😊
finally someone agreeing. you cant compare a 300 seater plane with a 200 seaters
Are we talking about the smallest version of the a350 or the longest version?
@@texxon3355 both A350 variants seat above 300 on average
A330neo vs 787
A350 vs 777X
Just compare their specifications..
It's exactly that.
A350 vs 777??
A350 vs 777
@@chounphounsanoy291 The 777-X would pretty much slide the 777 series out of the A350s target market though. It's designed to accommodate 426 in a 2-class configuration, those are pretty much 747 numbers, the largest A350, by comparison, the A350-1000, is only optimized for 369 passengers, heck, even the much smaller 777-8 beats the A350-1000 in terms of capacity at 384 passengers. The A350 is a good competitor for the 777-Classic but it's simply too small to compete with the 777-X.
Trekkie_ _0802 the A350 is a good aircraft to fill the gap between the Dreamliner and A330, and the 777X
Thank you! I’ve spent years trying to convince my avgeek friends of this, but I was always alone in the argument. Now that I’ve got a RUclips channel on my side it will be much easier 😎
P.S. to answer your question at the end, the A350 is my favourite plane overall so I’ll have to go with that one!
same here
Hope this video knocks some sense into them. I've flown on the B777-300 ER, A350-900, and the B787-9.... They're all beautiful. What matters most is the airline service. Fly on a shitty airline, and the plane types wouldn't matter.
Cough PIA cough
@@Speedster___ sadly yes, PIA has gone from +stronk to -stronk :(
Best youtuber, I always love when you upload
:)
Ok i will let you explain
Finally someone got it right lol.
THANK YOU!!! This shows the difference between just common aviation enthusiast, and the people who truly understand the aviation industry, market trends, and capability differences. Also, I prefer the 787 when it comes to looks, size, and usefulness to airlines, but I have not flown on the A350 yet, so I could not truly say which one I like better.
This is a terrific explanation, thank you! I see them both side-by-side in LHR all the time but never realized the seating differences.
I just flew on the A350 from Bengaluru to Paris. I have flown on the 787 a lot before. There is no comparison. The 787 is a wonderful flight, but the A350 is a game changer. It was the most comfortable flight I have ever taken. It is quite literally the rolls royce of the skies.
I've seen a few trip reports on the a350 and my God it's like a helium balloon it just glides as if there was nothing there, landing even more incredible, turbulence, what's that??
I would say that about the a380, nothing like it
Eh, the 787 is a game changer in its own right too, considering how it's allowed airlines to operate previously thin routes profitably.
As someone who flew on both the a350 and b787, I would say that I prefer the a350. It is much quieter than the b787 and the seats are more comfortable for passengers in economy. As passengers, the a350 is unarguably better. If we were to compare both aircrafts specs, then that wouldn't be fair because they were both made for different purposes (as you said).
I agree completely on the passenger experience.
My thoughts exactly.
I love your channel! This is the BEST video explaining the difference between the two. Lots of so-called "aviation fans" who have no idea what they're talking about! Thank you!
I really like the way you dissect these planes. Unlike the majority of videos on RUclips, yours are very informative and a pleasure to watch.
Thank you and keep up the good work! 👍👍
Flown on both, like both :)
Comfy, modern, relaxing long haul cabin in both. You definitely feel a marked difference compared to the old guard on the same routes.
From the cabin it’s pretty clear that the A350 is bigger, I agree with the remarks that it’s more reminiscent of the largeness of a triple 7 cabin and not a Dreamliner. The Dreamliner has always felt very spacious and modern but 767-like in overall size from cabin perspective.
Very happy to see this explained! I think you’re right, people saw both aircraft types were made from composite materials so made the assumption they’re the same class - but they forget that the 787 replaced the 767 to compete with the very popular A330, and the A350 replaced the 340 to better compete with the 777. Will be interesting to see how the 777x competes with the A350 once the global crisis has tapered off and we can see true results.
Great story to tell - I didn't know the size differences. The A350 BandAid was well criticized - they went onto design a better plane. Pity that Boeing didn't take the same medecine with their B737 Max.
Boeing truly has to learn a thing or two from the Airbus
A330 was first flown in 1994 and was a deeply modified A300 from the 1974 - still when they tried to modify it once more and called it a new plane, everybody thought it was a bad idea. And it was just in 2004. 30 years of basic construction being there and everyone went full boooo.
Meanwhile Boeing modifying it's 1968 737 (that heavily resembles the 1958 707 in many features) for the fourth time in mid-2010s (almost 60 year old "bones") - and everybody seems to like the Max (which I personally hate and won't fly if only not in a desperate need).
And then people be like "why does the max have so much problems?". It's like... bruh. You can't just stretch a 28.6 meters long plane up to 43.8 meters and pretend nothing gonna go wrong
Thanks for the explanation. I think they are both great. The A350 seems to have a more expansive digitization programme.
I love both of them
Different horses, different courses. 🐎🐎🐎
Very well done mate!
A350 is the winner for me. However it also depends on how many seats an airline craps into the aircraft :D
Good choice man a winner is safety and Technolgy 10 year better
@@holdensv2000 lol i can hear your happy european noises
A350 vs 777?
@@Amrdau A350 comes nowhere close to 9 abreast 777. But unfortunately that's not very common.
A350 is a bit cooler than the 787
Hello Coby: I have had the opportunity to fly both planes and I really loved them both. However, the A350 is very impressive with its interior design and it seems it feels more modern and spacious. I flew it from Frankfort to Shanghai right after the outbreak of the pandemic back in 2020 and it was a very nice flight.
Coby! Thanks for debunking this myth. I am now wiser for it! As usual, awesome video and you rock!
I worked for the first UK airline to order the 787 "the Dreamliner", to replace all their old 767s.
It was really exciting, we got to go in the cabin mockups etc at the Farnborough airshow, it looked great,(& BTW we also got to see the A380 cabin mockup - & the Airbus test pilots did a stunning A360/A380 crossover in front of the entire crowd, as if they were fighter jets!) .... but..... the 787 delivery process was embarrassingly painful. The 1st aircraft were actually delivered YEARS late.
So late that by the time they were actually delivered I'd actually left the company, so the first time I flew on one, was as a full fare paying passenger going on holiday.
I was SO disappointed! It was rubbish. The much vaunted environment was just a gimmick, everything felt plasticky & flimsy. The plane creaked, rattled & squeaked all the time - the old 767s never did that.
I can't compare to a A350 as I have never been on one, but my opinion of the 787 is NOT good.
Great video!
Flew longhaul on a 3 month old B789 and a 2 month old A359 on the same day, almost 3 years ago now. I preferred the latter because it was quieter and more spacious. (And yes, at the time I thought they were direct competitors.)
Thank you Coby for sharing that information and data. It never ceases to amze me how many folks were fixated on the concept of 787s vs A350s...outside of technologies, there's no comparison.
besides, after those 2 planes, both manufacturers have placed the same tech on other aircraft types.
Having flown both I think the 787 is the more beautiful looking aircraft but the A350 has a clearly better cabin in terms of passenger comfort.
Personally, anyone talking comfort is an idiot, especially on long haul(Is no such thing as comfort on long haul). NO one gives a damn other than those with gobs of money for maybe a layflat bed. The only thing anyone cares about is $$$/ticket for the masses in the cattle section.
you gotta wait and fly 777-x to make the final decision since 787 doesn't compete with a350.... lol
For the most part the airline determines cabin comfort not the plane manufacturer
@@odez180 I flew the 787 and the A350 on one day with only a 50 minutes stopover (I wouldn't even call it stopover it was getting of an airplane and rushing to the next). Both flights with Qatar. The A350 was more spacious and had a significantly lower noise level. The noise level is not determined by the airline its the aircraft itself that has a quieter cabin.
idpro83 it’s up to the airline to configure the interior for how much space each passenger gets but the noise level is a valid point. Not to many people consider that when it comes to comfort.
I love this. Your videos are always informative and on point! Keep up the good work. With❤ from Nigeria 🇳🇬
If I were a pilot, I would fly the 787>A350 because since it operates thinner routes, you get to fly to so many more exotic destinations than if you were flying an aircraft that flies more to the larger hubs and airports.
No, you won't. Pilot only gets pay when plane is moving. Bigger plane = longer haul = work less shift.
Actually it doesn’t work like that, sorry. The A350 (Ethiopian I believe) flies their A350’s to Zanzibar, Kilimanjaro, Cape Town, Casablanca, Port Louis, Victoria, and Pointe Noire (I think) depending on the time of the year when passengers are most frequent. So no, you don’t get to go to more exotic places if you fly 787 sadly.
@@aspiringcaptain TUI 787s fly to more…TUI 787s fly to whole Caribbean and same with some Virgin Atlantic 787-9s
Both are great in their own class. Just like I love camry, accord, mazda6 each are unique in their own way.
I prefer the 787!
Very detailed and logical explanation!
I personally haven't experienced the A350. My only 787 experience was with Singapore Airlines which operated the dash 10 type. The plane was modern, comfortable and made the flight more than just a trip. The flight was an enjoyment.
After the pandemic I'd like to try the 787s operated by ANA
I agree with the non-comparison. Haven’t tuned in for a while, glad I did today. And you’re rockin’ that beard 👍🏻😉
I was a bit shocked when I saw this video but it’s good to know that the A350 has a bit more room to grow in sales.
Vietnam Airlines ❤️❤️❤️ (as I’m a Vietnamese 😄😄😄) .btw your video is a really good one. This is the first video of yours which I watched but I feel it is so informative and reliable. The clips and images are also great and practical which make your words weigh much more significant... #lovefromvietnam
Exactly. That's why your channel caught my attention over some other enthusiastic but less accurate channels. Good insights.
I appreciate that!
The chart you did at 5.17 in is fantastic, I've been looking for something like that, is there any chance you could do a chart with all the main commercial airliners on it, even just the regular (non streched) versions?
I loved my flight on an ETIHAD 787-9 BUT I WISH TO FLY ON A A350 TOO
Great video! I'd love to see more videos with similar comparisons. Maybe 737 variants vs. a320/a321......love math when someone else is doing the work! :D
Take the A321 out of the equation. It is a mid range aircraft. The 737 is a dead duck. Boeing overeached rather than build a new aircraft. Should have listened to the engineers not the bean counters before the 800, never mind the max. The 737 is an early 60's design, way beyond its lifespan .
Very clear explanation! Thank you, Coby.
Hi Colby That's another excellently produced video - very well researched and presented! It takes a more knowledgeable type to take on well established "truths" and turn them on their head Well done! Brian
Cody really out here explaining
fr!
Do you mean *ex-planing*? lol
*Coby
At 5:54, there's an error in the calculations shown. 68.4 and 266.5 for their respective A350 types has been interchanged.
This needed to be said on a large platform so thank you
Very informative. But what it misses is the fact that range now takes priority over the number of seats. I’m a aviation strategy consultant myself and I’ve built plenty business plans / fleet plans for airline customers. And sorry to inform you, but for most of the airlines, the 787 and the A350 are the two options they have to select from for their long term strategy and planning. Large capacity aircraft are going out of fashion (need) for airline consumers, as evident by the fall of A380 and the 777s. As the concept of “thick routes” (point to point) is taking over, the “hub and spoke” model is going out of trend. Airlines want more and more point to point connectivity rather than huge number of seats to a hub airport and then smaller aircraft ops from there. Hence, it eventually boils down to, 1)Ownership cost, 2)yearly maintenance expense and 3)ability to make upto 75%+ PLF on most potentially available routes. So one can choose to ignore these aspects, but it is the reality and airlines are not picking between a 777/777x and A350, but rather between a 787 and A350.
I've flown both and for the passenger it really depends on the operator. They are both much nicer to fly in than the 777 or A330
In what way are they nicer to fly in than the 777?
@@accesscrimea The engines are quieter and the ride is less bumpy
Another proof regarding what you said is what Boeing themselves are mentioning! They only mention the A350 as the direct competitor to their 777x, but not to their Dreamliner!
Regarding the preferences, I haven't flown any of them, but if I have the luxury to choose which one to fly, I am going to go with the A350, because I simply trust Airbus products over Boeing.
Is that because the 737 MAX?
@@KAVX686 that's a competitor for the A320neo class, nowhere near the conversation of the 777x or 787 or A350.
@@akshaygowrishankar7440 he means Boeing is losing its trust because of the 737 max incident.
@@sagarshroff9624 okay, I thought you were asking about the first bit
you make good sense man stay alive when flying to your destination the A350 is 12 years younger built with more composites better wings and more powerful engines better fly-by-wire systems it a no brainer that why Delta and more American Airlines will pick later Airbus is building around safety and not short cuts for profit over safety so arrive alive
Well done sir and I learned something I did not know. From the front I've always thought they look similar with the way their cockpit windows are laid out and it is sometimes hard to tell the difference until you look at the winglets. Before Covid slowed things down Lufthansa's flights out of Munich into KCLT, my home airport had changed from an A346 in the summer or A333 in the winter to an A359 and it was a good looking aircraft. When they started flying into here many years ago they used a B744 which was a treat for me. New subscriber here so keep up the good work.
When you look at the facts and factors, he is right. Great job Coby!
So all this time, I have been lied to?
*How many other lies have I been told by the council?*
Son. I hate to break it to you.
You are adopted.
@@adamhlali8106 😂😂😂😂
Team 787 all day, you can’t beat that wing flex 😍
@@curtiswhyte3297 lol you're rediculous if you think wing flex looks rediculous
@@notbillnye8536 And your even more ridiculous if you judge someone else's taste
Its not wing flex its raked
Totally agree... look at a350 head on..a straight wing with a twist on the end..not exactly awe inspiring.. can't beat graceful curved of that 787 wing!!
I agree, the 787 wing flex is awesome and the whole plane just looks better but remember that they are not competitors...
Thanks for the great video. The Qatar Air example with the list of destinations 787/A350 is deployed, was quite helpful to see the point.
Very interesting, great job explaining all of this. I never knew to compare them in this way.
Range is another key difference to be mentioned.
A350 just looks amazing 🙈😎
A350>787
@Minsung Kim dream on matey
@Radif Mdrrr!
You are a frustred Airbus Fanboy 😁😂
@@ndlben7129 airbus forever, is best. But i'd like fly in the 787-10
@@ellyligth ive flown on a 787 and an a350 the a350 was so damn quiet compared to how loud the 787 is
Finally a video that makes sense! I love the basis of comparisons made.
I just flew from London to phx in a a350 and I was really impressed. Best plane I’ve been in to date!
I’ve flown on the 787 four times and the A350 just once and I personally preferred the A350 experience
It just depends on the airline
I don't like Airbus cockpits
“... recently retired their entire triple seven (777) fleet” - 4:53
If I remember correctly Delta cancel “their” (order was made by Northwest Airlines, before the merger) order for 787s for A350s as well as replaced their 747-400s/747-451s (again Northwest Airlines, before the merger) with A350s.
Assuming I remember correctly, does anyone have any theories as to why?
It was the delayed delivery of the 787. Had Delta gotten the 787 by 2010 they likely would have taken delivery. But the delay allowed them to defer their purchase decision. Delta ordered 25 A330neos a few years afterwards in addition to the A350's. By 2016 when the cancel decision was made Delta just didn't need the 787.
Delta has bought Airbus exclusively for the last 2 decades. They still fly some old Boeing/McDonald Douglas planes, but most have been retired.
Because the A350 is 12 years younger built with more composites better wings and more powerful engines better fly-by-wire systems it a no brainer that why Delta and more American Airlines will pick later
jefflewis4 Thank you.
Makes a lot of sense. The era of 4 engines jet is ending anyway. There are almost no routes that will demand a 500 passenger jet that can be profitably operated. They have to retire their 747s, and if they are also retiring their old 777s. They really need to fill the gap for the large jetliners, and it will be better to just replace them all with the same new jet that can fulfill all the roles they need and really bank on the economies of scale.
I've just recently flown an 8 hour flight in economy on the A350-900 and was very impressed. The noise reduction in the cabin, vibration was non-existing, air filtration in the cabin, mood lighting, size of windows, etc. all of which stood out. I can't say that it's a better plane than the Dreamliner since I haven't flown on the Dreamliner, but I must say, the A350 is truly an impressive plane.
I flew the A350 to Singapore, then flew the 787 on the same route...then scheduled my next flight on the 787. It is currently my favorite plane for comfort, seating configuration (United economy), etc.
787 but i do love the a350 too
The A350 is a stunning airplane to my eyes, especially if dressed with the elegant Lufthansa livery
Finnair
"elegant" Lufthansa 🤔
My BOI Coby be vibing on a 1million kill streek
I used to be a Boeing/787 fanboy just because I was American and that was the thing to do, but have now completely swapped to Airbus as I started to learn more about Airbus systems, cockpit design, efficiency, manufacturing etc. So now I would side with the A350 for sure. I wonder how many other Boeing fans out there haven’t really ventured into Airbus that much and just support them because they are American.
I used to be a Boeing fan also but I'm now all over Airbus.
If given the option, I'd 100% take retraining for the 787. It's such a beautiful bird, not to mention the bleedless packs and better pilot comfort, it's all around just a much prettier cockpit, quieter too.
I love the 787 and would be flying it for our airline, if it wasn’t for the longer trips. I prefer shorthaul routes, unfortunately our 787 do not fly these 🤨
To me the A350 cockpit is ugly, and the window design looks like you’re in the Spaceshuttle.
what I will say seeing as I've flown on both - Eitihad 787, Finnair and Qatar A350 is that the A350 is more comfortable because XTRA WIDE BODY.
787's were designed as a 2-3-2 but nearly every airline fits them out as a 3-3-3 thus meaning a 17 inch seat width as opposed to the 3-3-3 on the A350 XTRA WIDE BODY which has 18 to 18.5 inch seat width in economy.
Thats how I know when people saying they prefer the 787 are probably Americans who have never flown on either and just lying and just making stuff up to defend Boeing
No, the 787's were not designed as 2-3-2. That was the 767 a much narrower airplane. 787 is same width as the a330, good for 8 wide. 2-4-2 seating. A350 is wider good for 3-3-3 seating, but not quite as wide as 777.
THANK YOU. I have no idea why this is such a firm belief in the community.
I agree that they are different in terms of size, but they both have similar concepts like composite materials, maximum efficiency and even the designs are very similar
Flown on both like both as for which to prefer if flying economy no question A350 premium or business probably would pick the 787 it feels more high tech and in those class seating the comfort level is the same. the A350 "Feels" like a a330 with an updated interior where the 787 feels like a new plane with the big windows and high tech (questionable value though) dimming windows.
I heard and read from a various people now that if you fly regularly with the 787, you start to hate the dimming windows. Apparently these things are not getting dark enough to really keep the sunlight out at cruise altitude which can get really annoying.
@@shi01 You're so right. I have flown on the 787 several times, and I have developed a hate for those windows.
While they block out most of the light, they radiate heat like an oven.
Also, you can't just open them a little to take a look outside or take a picture. You have to clear the entire window and getting the sun right in your eyes.
I really don't understand why they had to change something that wasn't broken in the first place?
I can see that from a crew perspective it's just easier to press a button to open all the windows before landing, and then lock it, but from a passenger viewpoint I think it was a terrible idea to replace the regular blinds.
Finally, haven't been on the 350 yet so I'll reserve my judgment on that.
shi01 I have flown multiple times I dont hate the windows but the usefulness is not great and they are not that good but still pretty cool .
787 forever
I have flown the A350 from Hong Kong to LAX, the 787-9 from SFO to SIN and the 787-10 from SGN to SIN. The configurations, seating, service made a difference in my experience. They were all more enjoyable to the older aircraft.
Thank you, I’ve seen a lot of channels making videos on 787vsa350. I’ve been trying to tell them for a long time that the a350 competes with the b777 and not the 787. More people need to see this video.
787 = A330neo
777X = A350
@@77l96 the distance of seat number between 787 and A350 is much larger than 777X and A350 plus A350 is A350-2000 capable
Just compare the MTOW: the difference is huge.
Fly on both often for work trips. A350 is massive and I remember on my first time on one I was shocked how quiet it was. 787 is a great plane as well and my favorite thing is seeing the wings flex up as the lift increases
I simply like both jets. I’ve flown on the 787 and A350, and they are both pretty quiet. In all, both of them are really nice jets to fly on.
787
I’ve only flown the A350 once, but every time I’ve flown in the 787 I’ve been more comfortable than I was in the A350. This was mainly because they were less crowded, which makes sense after watching the video. In terms of looks they’re both really beautiful planes. Also, the diagram at 5:15 blows my mind; not at all how I expected comparisons of these planes to turn out.
Depends on the Airline not the plane.
I find the a350 a lot smoother and quiter to fly.
Thanks Dr. Cooper.
787 and A350 is the same as the blonde/brunette conundrum. It could be argued until the end of time and never establish a clear winner. I did learn a lot today. Thanks!
I wasn't the only one who was up in the air about whether these planes were competitors or not.
Thank you for the great explanation.
Their maximum passenger numbers are diffrent a350 is for b777 or 777X and a330 neo is for b787
True
DCR KANAL that’s what the video says..so thanks for repeating it I guess...
@@iamjames8200 lol i made this comment before the video😅
A350 all the way!
I'm always having this discussion with friends and random people and they don't trust me.🤦🏽♂️Thanks for this video.
Personally I have always enjoyed the A350 comfort. I have flown Qatar A350 on multiple round trips between Philly and Doha and always loved the experience. I also experienced Cathay Pacific's A350 between Tokyo and Hong Kong which was also incredible.
My only experience on 787 is between LAX and Tokyo on American which exceeded expectations.
Great video!
The 787 is one of the best modern planes Boeing has built. Right up there with the 777x!
@Sean well done airbus fan alway's bring up the max. Do you want a gold sticker
@Sean hmm good like with ATTOL airbus fans 😂😂😂. You will be baby sitting or aircraft
@ASHIM GARG you believe what you want
@Sean I didn't star anything you did with the shitty comment about the max. Ye I deserve a gold sticker say I'm a dick head on it
@Sean ????? So if I was so rude but It is actually annoying when Airbus fans bring up the max
yeah i always knew a350 was too big for 787, and a330neo was just large enough for 787
the 777 always have been almost as big as a350
The 777 is bigger and wider then the a350 what are you talking about
Very good and informativ Video, cool Graphics.
So the 330neo is the Competitor for the 787?
And how much of the first 350-concept goes eventualy into the evolution from 330 to the 330neo?
A350s are wider and offers the same 3x3x3 seat config. Been flown in both I can say the XWB is roomier, seats are wider and engines is quieter. Can't say the same about japanese carriers as they use a different config for 787s (2x4x2) and nobody can deny this is the proper seat arrangement for the Boeing aircraft. I think both are beautiful and fulfill their purpouse over the average.
everyone thinks that the a350 and 787 are competitors because they look a lot alike
And there very similar in range and and the amount of seats
@@SierraDelta- nope, A350's seating capacity is much near to the 777 rather than a 787
A359 is about the same as B777-200series and B78X while A35k is about the same as B77W and B777-8
Also the range of the A350 is a bit further than any Boeing aircraft, except 777-200LR