Tiny BOKEH MASTER for M43 / Sigma 56mm f/1.4 Lens Review for MFT
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 июл 2024
- Review of Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Micro Four Thirds & Sony E Mount. Testing portraits, autofocus, video capabilities, & bokeh quality.
👍 Thanks for watching! Please like, comment, & subscribe.
Dunna's Channel: / dunnadidit
=============================
Products Mentioned:
=============================
Sigma 56mm for M43 at Camera Canada: goo.gl/C2ngeG
International Amazon Link: ...Coming Soon
B&H Alternative: bhpho.to/2ryxIke
Sigma 56mm for Sony at Camera Canada: goo.gl/HoQ1sE
International Amazon Link: geni.us/h1MVA
=============================
Gear I Use to Make Videos:
=============================
kit.co/GeraldUndone/youtube-v...
=============================
Best Deals for Camera Gear
=============================
Gear Focus Marketplace: geni.us/gearfocusGU
Amazon Top Deals: amzn.to/3d9tdT4
B&H Deal Zone: bhpho.to/2SCDrnj
=============================
Music:
=============================
I use Artlist for my background music needs. Use this link to get two extra months when signing up: bit.ly/2TV5sYT
=============================
Follow Me:
=============================
Twitter: / geraldundone
Instagram: / geraldundone
Discord: / discord
=============================
Patreon & PayPal:
=============================
If you wish to support the channel monetarily, you can use my Patreon page here: / geraldundone
Or directly via PayPal here: www.paypal.me/geraldundone
This is appreciated, but unnecessary, and no content will ever be behind a paywall.
=============================
Affiliate Links:
=============================
Some of the links in my video descriptions are affiliate links, which means at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a qualifying purchase. If you have a different purchase in mind, you can also use these storewide links below.
🛒 Amazon: geni.us/1m1G32
🛒 B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2MYRKBE
=============================
Recommended Channel Tools:
=============================
💬 Closed captioning provided by ONEXTRA: onextra.ca
🚩 If you're a fellow RUclipsr, I highly recommend you try TubeBuddy. It's helped my channel immensely: www.tubebuddy.com/pricing?a=U...
=============================
#sigma #microfourthirds #lenses 
Наука
Should we start a new channel together? Dunna Undoned It? Gerald Did it? Too far? Okay maybe later then...🤷♂️
Dunnald Undid
Bryan Schultz - haha Dunnald!
Robert Kosara - ooh! I like where this is going. The puns are strong with you.
I appreciate your portraits and edits. That's a sub from me.
Notaku - thanks so much! I appreciate the kind words and support!
The unboxing part is the best I've seen so far!
Finally. I was waiting for someone to review the mft version and you did not disappoint, good job.
well done Gerald. This is the kind of clean and simple review I prefer. Thanks for doing this.
So many shortsighted reviewers on RUclips (like Hugh Brownstone from 3 Blind Men and Ten Thousand Affiliate Links) only hype up about how amazing certain products are but they never dare to hint any kind of negative opinion at all. That type of selling might be successful for them in the short term, but it is so misleading. Thank you for NOT doing that. Appreciate that your channel values integrity and you're willing to deliver both pro's and con's. Great stuff.
"focal length" is NOT a negative. It's"appropriate" for YOUR use or it's not. The lens has good ,quiet AF; is fast, sharp edge to edge, and 56 mm ; What's not to like?
THANK YOUUUUU! Been waiting for a mft mount review of this lens for AGES. Too many Sony reviews.
Love your videos man. The test shots with the framing were so nice. Next level vids. Thanks.
Definitely the best unboxing I've watched! And the music too 😍🤩
The lens attachment sequence was awesome dude! Also I agree. My pores need their own vlogging lens. They've got a lot to say!
Another great video, duder. The research and testing, as always, second to none.
Thanks, Wayne! Always appreciate your comments. 😃👍
Got all three and the gh5 , perfect combo !
The Olympus 75mm f/1.8 is another great lens but also often not a very practical focal length even outdoors. When you can find a use for it, it’s fun to use and makes beautiful images. Heck, even if you don’t use it much, the lens itself is so darn pretty, you can just sit and stare at that thing and smile :-)
It's funny how different people's perspectives can be - I just can't get used to work with an 85mm equivalent, it's too short. On the other hand, the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 is one of the very few lenses that I *really* regret selling. I bought mine for a ridiculous price ($200, with a battered E-P2 thrown in), and it was the most delicious portrait lens that I've ever owned. Worked really well for sports and action, too.
I use to have the Olympus 75mm and ended up selling it. I replaced it with the Panasonic 42.5 f1.7 has been far more useful to me. It's a great lens
Great presentation man, love it!
That intro was funny..........Made me LOL, Thanks
and thanks for the M43 Love
Thanks, Rick! Sorry I've been neglecting you. 😜👍
FINALLY! A review for the MFT version. Leave it to you! Yep, I've one of those niche users that was waiting on this. I prefer right around the 60mm range on MFT (I know that's a personal taste thing). Thanks for the detailed review and that awesome docking intro.
Same here. Some of my best, most interesting shots were on the Oly 60mm f/2.8 macro used as a short telephoto lens. It's a great focal length! Waiting on my own Sigma 56/1.4 from Henry's. :)
Wow! Thank you so much for this video! it explained it so well
Hey Gerald I'm kind of swimming upstream moving from Fuji to MFT with a G9. I'm deciding between Sigma 56mm and a second hand Nocticron 42.5 to try and get that strong bokeh I was getting with my Fuji 56mm F1.2 specifically for photography - any suggestions for me on what to go for?
Great review/demonstration. But like you, I like the 42.5mm range for the tight shots, or the 35-100 Power OIS II for the flexability.
Great info! Didn't know these Sigmas were weather sealed for MFT! Definitely going to check them out. Thanks
Thank you for thinking about us.
I get perfectly round bokeh balls out of my GH5, I love this lens. It is my go to for portraits and B Roll. It just depends on your work flow. The Pani 42.5 doesn't even compare to the sigma. It really just amounts to taking a few steps back if you can, if you like the 85mm. It just takes an adjustment. I never use in the studio for vlogging. It is totally a niche lens. If you are a portrait photographer or do head shots then this is for you.
That docking sequence was too funny. Subbed.
Haha. Thanks! Happy to have a new subscriber. 😃🙏
the unboxing scene was epic
Your approach to lens reviews is awesome gerald. Keep up the awesome shit!!
do you have a comparison of this for sony with the fuji 56 1.2?
Hello,
For indoors portraits should i consider de 56 or go with the 30mm?
I dont have studio but normal rooms, 4x4m
Holy! Epic intros don't get more intense than this! Wooooof
And overall great video, opened my eyes alot on the m43 system.
what mic setup are you using? Also, review of 30 mm f1,4?
Differenc between the sigma and the olympus 45 1.8, and panasonic 42.5. What is the better portrait lens?
Hi, I know it's a strange to ask u it , but what s the minimal focus distance in your copy of the 56mm sigma lens?
I got mine yesterday , and my copy shows 0.4m in camera then I checked it with the "meter" and it's really is !
Now I'm confused who's lying the manual or my copy has some malfunction!?
Do you use your G9 for photography, or just video? When do you use M43 and when do you use Sony?
I like your style, good job!
It is 2021 already, and I just bought the Sigma 16, 30, and 56 f1.4’s. Sweet, sweet, sweet trio for my brand new G9. Coming to MFT from Canon Full frame, and loving these beautifully made little optical wonders.
Thanks for review! How compares with zuiko 45 1.8?
I have de Sigma 16mm 1.4 for MFT, love the 32mm 1.4 FOV for video!
Looks like a good lens for street photography. Good review.
what about the panasonic 42.5 1.7 and the sigma 30mm 1.4 I have the 30 but am thinking about getting the 42.5
Hello . I have a question . I have a Sony 6300 and I got this lens as a gift, unfortunately I need an adapter to connect the lens to the camera. But I still couldn't found the fog adapter that fits it. Can you tell me which adapter fits this lens so that I can install it on the Sony camera? Thank you 👍
Was waiting for this video! Really interesting points! Already have a 42.5mm f1.7 but still considered it as it has a little more compression and better sharpness. Now I know I will just wait until I can afford that amazing 1.2 ;) Thanks
What about the 42.5mm f1.2, I know it's expensive but it looks sooo good?!
Do we need to worry about it not supporting DFD ?
Does the autofocus work ok ?
That b-cam position reminds me of documentary b-cam interview footage. Could be very useful if you want more of a serious tone.
I was thinking the same thing. The close up on the subject's face from the side is a pretty common shot in interview-style documentaries.
I have this for my Sony a6500 great little lens so far and ohhhh that bokeh! It completes my Sigma Trinity if you will. The 16, 30, and 56mm are great if not a bit noisy (AF) lenses.
Wow! Nice AF and bokeh. I need to buy this lens!!!
This would be an excellent lens for equine photography and product photography as well. With some extension tubes, I expect it could do some respectable macro (or at least close-up) work as well. I used to use my Sigma 60mm f/2.8 with extension tubes for close-ups and sold it to an eBay buyer who was looking for something to get detail shots of firearms with and he really liked it. I think the close focus distance on this one is about the same on paper although I don't know how well it works with extension tubes.
Does the focal length of a m43 lens double on a m43 camera? And if yes, why would that happen with a native lens (a m43 lens)?
🙄🤔🤨
How far was your background from the camera when you shot portrait examples?
that music man, so awesome. I love your intro.
Thanks, Nicolas! Means a lot. 😃🙏
I’ve never felt so much anxiety while attaching a lens. Lol. Awesome job!
Haha. Thanks, Paul. 👍😜
Can you do a video on autofocus settings for the gh5?
I wonder if this Sigma 56 is better than Sony 85 1.8 for portraits ?
Love that you are recording how you take the picture at 3:00. I have a GH5 and I'm surprised to see your exposure fluctuating. Mine doesn't do that. Am I missing a trick? I think if you did a series of videos showing how to operate the camera for video and stills using that POV, it would be awesome for newbs like myself.
Thanks, Kai! Some cameras will momentarily change the exposure, often by changing the aperture, just to acquire focus. In that sample, on the G9, when you switch between the zoomed-in focus checker and then focus with pinpoint it flashes a brighter exposure to make sure everything is sharp, then it switches back to the exposure you dialed in for taking the picture.
Omg!!! The blades on that lens look like a weapon in Mad Max! I’m assuming you used all of the Harry Potter features of the lumix to pull off the badass focus and self timer shots? What impresses me most is around 4min. You pull in tight on the bokeh balls of light and the clarity of your hair strands in that image is impressive! I’m wondering how much post tweakiness was in that image?
The ones that you're seeing in Lightroom are mostly unedited. Probably just a little exposure and white balance adjustment. The lens is very good for detail and sharpness though as you pointed out with the hair strands.
Hey gerald I'm wondering if you have any plan to review the budget side of MFT lens? Such as olympus 40-150mm f4-5.6, panasonic lumix with the similar focal length, the 7artisans and the meike lineups. I'd love to see it because another reviewers for budget lenses are not that good of a video quality..
I swear you're one of very few who reviewed this lens on MFT, so thank you! lol Disregarding the fact that Panasonic's autofocusing is terrible to begin with, this actually looked pretty nice. It's not the fastest for video work, but it looks smooth and seems to be pretty accurate. I can't say I agree with your negative feelings toward the focal length, because you know what it's going to be when you buy it, so obviously it's for a specific look. For someone like me who has the Viltrox EF-M2 and the Sigma 18-35 with my G85, which ends up being around 26-50mm (FF equivalent), getting a 42.5mm isn't enough of a difference in focal length to be worth it personally. Yes, 112mm is a bit odd compared to the standard 85mm for portrait work, but I still think it's a compelling lens considering the sharpness, f/1.4, and even the price.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Casey! Appreciated.
Hey Gerald, Well you and Dunna talked me into getting this lens ;) and Ive been loving shooting portraiture with it on my A7iii...Thanks!
Question though, I just noticed that my JPEG max L size drops to 10m when I put this lens on my A7iii....I’m confused?? Can you clarify for me?
Thanks!
Adam
It's probably because it's a crop lens. Your a7 III is full frame, but this lens was designed for the crop cameras like a6500, so you can only use the cropped portion of your sensor, thus the loss in resolution.
Gerald Undone yeauuuh...I posed the same question to Dunna at the same time, but he beat you to the draw LOL. Thanks for getting back to me though, I spent my morning watching more of your videos, now I’m late to work ha ha, good thing I’m the boss! I feel like a jackass buying this lens for my A7iii LOL
Buying a GH5 this week anyway, then I’ll do a comparison between that and the Sony, just sold my G7 so maybe I’ll pick up a G9 too...good thing I got that money tree in my backyard...sheesh!!
Does this fits the Bmpcc4k ?? Can anyone help me ??? And if i need an adapter can anyone help me to find the right one to use my bmpcc4k ?
What an incredibly dramatic Lens unboxing!
Haha. Thanks, Dylan! 😃👍
Thumbs up just for the intro. Great video bro.
Thanks a lot! I'm glad you liked it. 👍😃
Could you kindly do a Panasonic G9 review whenever you have some time? Thanks.
Lumix G9 mk1. Exquisite taste Gerald. Good to know you have a soft spot for MFTs.
I'm anxiously waiting for my pre-order to ship from Henry's. For myself, I think it'll make an absolutely fantastic indoor sports lens.
The problem on m43 is getting that shutter speed down in low light situations. I have the 35-100mm f/2.8, which is beautifully sharp, but still too damned slow! I've taken it out to the climbing gym to get some nice action shots, and ended up at ISO3200, which is pretty lousy on the g85.
I'm also looking at the Samyang 135mm f/2.0 for the same reason; the 100-300mm f/4-5.6 is wonderful outdoors, but pretty much useless indoors.
Anyway, great vid as always!
Have you been using this lens for indoor sports? If so, how do you like it? It's what I have been hoping to use as well.
@@Wristworm Sorry, didn't see this reply! I've used it a ton both indoors and out, and it's epic. In fact I just finished shooting a couple music videos which used it heavily. Its autofocus on the G9 was decent enough (no follow focus on my gimbal, sadly).
Here's an unedited photo from my last indoor shoot (56/1.4, ISO800, 1/60):
photos.app.goo.gl/6uVRc4GccHnjG51d7
No problem. I ended up getting one. Love it. Happy with the results I got with a basketball game.
For portraits I really like the lack of distortion, requiring longer focal lengths. 85mm FF equivalent is my minimum, and I'd prefer even longer, like 120-200mm FF equivalent.
I knew there were people like you out there! 😜👍
I have the 12-60 2.8-4, which works well for portraits, and I also have the Sigma 60mm 2.8. After a recent photography event, I found that I REALLY like the Sigma 60 for close portraits. I'm very interested in this lens for times when I want more light and/or shallow depth of field.
Yeah, if you like the Sigma 60mm, I can really see you enjoying this lens.
I picked up the Olympus 75mm f1.8 a while back and have been learning the art of portraits and if you have the space and a willing subject and reasonable background, it does a spectacular job, super natural and attractive looking (even taking photos of guys!). On the other hand, it tests the IBIS when it's dim and the IBIS does nothing for moving targets anyway, and you do have to be somewhat far away, maybe 3 or 4m /10-12ft or so. So I guess this would bring that down to about 2/3 of those distances or a bit higher which would be very helpful. And flipping back again, the 75mm allowed me to take candid photos because I was far enough away that people weren't aware I was doing it and some of those were GREAT :-) In other news Olympus 45mm f1.8 is on the way in the same box that my Sigma 16mm is in. Looking forward to both of those! :-)
Hello I purchased a 50mm f1.4 and when I tried it out on f1.4 it will not focus ..from f2.8 and up it work but not under f2.8???????
Were you using auto-focus? In low light some lens/camera combinations have a hard time with AF in low light with the aperture wide open.
i'm on the fence between this one and the oly 45mm 1.8.for my EM1 MKII
Thanks for the review
I Sold my 12-60f3.5 and my 45-200mark2 to bis this Lens.
I had the 60mm2.8 and i loved it. I very liked the focal lengh.
I cant wait to get the new Lens soooooo much!
This channel will have 100K subscribers within 6 months. That's for sure!
Nice video 👍🏻. Would you do a comparison between the Leica 42.5 f1.2 and the Sigma 56 f1.4?
I can tell you right now that the Leica would win in terms of weather sealing if you just got them wetter and wetter until they were ruined, but that would be kind of stupid! The Sigma would win on sharpness. It is the sharpest lens for micro four thirds and it is sharp edge-to-edge wide open. The Leica is sharp in the center wide open, but the corners are soft until you stop it down a bit, which is why I don't own one. If I have to stop it down to at least f/1.7 to get sharp corners, I might as well just use the Lumix 42.5mm f/1.7 which is much smaller with an excellent close focus distance.
How do you get your AF to not breathe like that on MFT?
These lens are for basic users, let's say. But what's the professional equivalent to Sigma 56mm, @Gerald?
Sweet lens!! Just watching the vid now, great style! This lens would be serious on the BM pocket cam.
Thanks, Hugh! Appreciated. 😃👍
What focal length do you like best for portraits? Do you think 56mm(112mm) is too long?
I prefer the 105. I have the 85 ART but I want to trade that in for the Sony 85 1.8 for something lighter. You can check out my portraits at www.flickr.com/photos/zakna/albums/72157674781457878
80-280mm equivalent is OK for me. 112mm is great.
Wait so I watched your video on the relationships between lens focal lengths and sensors but I am a little confused. Why is a 56mm lens 112mm on full frame? Is it a crop lens? Wouldn't it be 56mm on full frame and with that micro 4/3rd's sensor on your gh5 it would become 112mm because of 2.0 crop factor? That would make it 56mm on full frame and 112mm on your crop sensor right?
@@helpsloan Right. The 56mm on the MFT body has a field of view equivalent to a 112mm on a FF body. So on MFT a 56mm F1.4 is said to be a 112mm F2.8 equivalent, since that's what you'd use on FF to get the same picture. (And the last factor, besides focal length and F-number, is the ISO: A MFT sensor at ISO 200 is "equivalent" to ISO 800 on FF.)
My favorite on full frame is 200mm. Usually using a 70-200mm zoom for portraits and seems like my favorite photos are at 200mm. So the reviewed lens is definitely not too long.
Good lens, great video!
This lens would be great for head shots! I do use the 42.5 F1.7 for portraits though.
The best unboxing ever!
Undone man. Bus driver. Good stuff. I am interested in renting this lens to test because I do miss the convenience of auto focus. My current portrait lens for m4/3 is a 1980's era Olympus Zuiko manual focus 50/1.8 which I bought for $35 US dollars to mount on a Pansonic GM5 & Olympus EPL-1. I'm old school and still order prints from 8x10 up to 20x30 posters. The final print and not the monitor zoomed at 100% will be the judge of the $445 dollar difference.
Interesting... I'm curious to hear what you think.
Man seeing this lens on the G9 reminded me a lot of when I shot with my D600 + 50 1.8. Looks great, just.. tight.
Maybe some day.. probably not. I just prefer shooting in the 40-60 equivalent range to get some more context into portraits, not much of a headshot person.
Hope Sigma brings us a low profile 40 equiv sometime (Fuji X or MFT) - they make great glass and fill a niche in the market, but their current size queen 40 1.4 and 50 1.4 aren't anything I'd want to lug around.
Is there any 40 you think is worth buying for MFT that could be made use of for portraits? Haven't heard much on the Panasonic 20 1.7 and f3.4 might be just a little too deep a DoF for what I'd optimally want (although I guess I shoot with 4.2 equivalent right now on the Fuji pancake..).
Yeah, I know what you mean. The closest you can get right now is 34mm (17mm) or 50mm (25mm) if you want fast apertures.
The AF-C test looks preety good to me.
Hmmm. This lense or the Olympus 75mm 1.8?
It's my personal favorite lens for street photos. You can get good shots without being too close to people you don't know.
An immediate ‘niche’ application for this lens on m43 camera bodies is in low light grungy live music. F/2.8 just doesn’t cut at these venues especially if the performers are hyper active and the camera is m43. You need all the help you can get. So portrait, live indoor entertainment an indoor sport turns the Sigma 56mm f/1.4 into a more versatile lens than just a mere niche lens.For an old pro in his 8th decade trying to cut back on weight and size I have to admit I was surprised at its small form factor, very cute indeed.
Oly 75mm focuses faster and doubles as a great sharp low light sports lens in gyms and for concerts. This wouldn't be my first choice. I can't believe I didn't know it existed until this video.
I dunno man, that focal length and bokeh, even on an mft looks pretty darn good. I'd be tempted to make it up with my feet. Throwin' it on the CERB wishlist
Nice review.
Thank you for the video, Gerald. I have Olympus EM5 Mark III and also 45mm f1.8 for the portrait. Now, I am thinking to get Olympus 75mm f1.8, but Sigma 56mm f1.4 looks nice option. Could you help me to suggest which one would be a better option?
I had the same question and went with the Sigma 56mm. Most of the reviews online mentioned that the Sigma 56mm is sharper around the corners than the 75mm, whilst the middle is about equal. Would be great if there is a video comparing these bokeh masters.
@@FamousAnon yeah, currently I am more inclined towards 75mm f1.8 as I have 45mm f1.8. And 56mm and 45mm are almost nearly close in terms of focal length. Still, looking for a comparison video to understand the differences.
The niche for this lens I see is indoor sports. Basketball and volleyball with their notoriously crapping lighting would benefit from the large aperture and focal length.
Sports (indoor of otherwise) really demands focal lengths 200mm and beyond, unless you plan on sticking yourself where you shouldn't be. It's of course super expensive to get something like that in a large aperture.
I keep revisiting this lens. This time because the Sigma 85 Art with Viltrox adapter on the Pocket 4k doesn't have peaking, and it's enormous. I'm not even going to try that combo for photos on the GH5 II. Although the 35-100 is fantastic, this could do well as a lens for covering keynotes and wedding toasts, whether video or photo.
Great video !
nice edit!
The photos so clean
Hi Gerald. Great content. What adapter would you recommend for the micro 4/3 when using a sony a6400?
Hey, thanks! Perhaps I'm confused, but the lens comes in different mounts, so why wouldn't you just get the Sony version?
Gerald Undone Hi. I failed to mentioned that I’ve already bought it....purely out of ignorance. So I think I’m left to just get an adapter
Thanks for replying
I use this with the 30mm 1.4 when doing street walks. I'm an introvert, I enjoy talking to people, but in person doing something like raising a camera at someone within a wide-angle range isn't very comfortable. It may help that I'm used to the Pentax 40mm and 70mm on an APS-C crop body which comes out to 60mm and 105mm equivalent on something like the Pentax KP. Going over to an equivalent of 60mm and 112mm wasn't much of a change for me, but if I'm being honest, I shoot a lot with a Pana Leica 12-60 2.8-4 unless I really need the faster lenses for low light or subject separation (f4 on a ~50 or 60mm focal length gives fairly good separation, but it's obviously not going to beat f1.4).
Thanks for your commentary on this lens and the unboxing with a story. I'll likely skip it as I own the little Sigma (m43) 60 f/2.8 already and at 6mm less it's a redundant focal length.
Thanks! I'm glad you liked the video. I can totally see why you'd skip this release. The only time you'd really take advantage of this new one is if you were hurting for light.
the olympus 75mm/1.8 is similar to the sigma. both are fast primes which offer a very narrow fov. i use the oly as a stills portrait lens and am often very pleased. there is a video use but interviews in a small studio might not be the best application. thanks for the effort and the sharing. thumbs up.
Any sharp, comparably fast 75mm to 120mm is not going to be beat by a 56mm for portraits. It makes sense you'd be pleased.
Great video mate thanks for the detailed review
I just bought my first mirrorless, the Olympus EM-10 MKiii which is Micro Four Thirds. I wanted to shoot video of my kids at the beach and out and about, so seems like this Sigma 56mm isn't any good?
The lens is great, I just think it's too tight for what I like. I prefer their 16mm and 30mm versions just because of the field of view.
@@geraldundone thanks for your reply mate, I think I might go for 30mm sigma cos 16mm is too landscapey looking for me
Great video, never know Sigma make lens for M43 till now....
I have the LEICA DG 42.5mm, it's kinda waste use on GH5S because camera's low res-sensor, but low light performance is GREAT. And I am still looking for a wider prime, Leica 25mm /F1.4 or Sigma 30mm/F1.4 which is better for video?
I think both are great options. I personally favour the Sigma, but I'd take either.
Sensor has plenty of megapixels for 4K video. Unless you are taking pictures with it, then your doing it wrong.
@@finnillson4808 Yeah, I also hope can take some pictures.... in low light....
For portraits, or inside for you tube video head shots, I like the Panasonic 25mm and the 42.5mm. That's nifty 50 and 85mm equivalent. with f1.7. For those of us on a budget, the 2 lenses together were less than $500. These 2 lenses plus the kit lens (14-42mm) take care of my basic needs in my office/studio. I also have a few vintage Canon FD lenses that I use with a speed booster. They're fun to use, but let's just say they probably are not appropriate for serious photography.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Art!