what low IQ take is this....... whoever made this post is either a bot or a legit fucking retard who thinks saying the word tyrant and not wearing mask = patriotism.. this dude literally walked around the park with. a. fucking. RIFLE! "pistol" brace or not- that is a bad idea.. he is lucky they were so nice and didn't beat him half to death.... stuff like this is why I am slowly growing to hate the "gun community"/"2a community", it's basically just a bunch of spregs and boomers who think joining the NRA and using the ATF meme endlessly means you are supporting and fighting for 2a rights.. Guns will never be banned.. you don't need to get in a facebook group to fight for that right! People in the a2 community who think like this are like people who think say the N-word and then say "Freedom of speech!" You just look like a fucking idiot and make the rest of us look bad.. Please stay on facebook and quit deluding the gene pool. get fixed.
This is exactly what I tell Liberals who are anti-gun - you want ONLY the cops to carry AR-15s?! Are you kidding?! They already run around with impunity.
Tbh quite a few would have been fine with it, since those were the ones who wanted George Washington to have more power and were fine with using the army to enforce the whiskey tax. Those founding fathers were also not particularly fond of the bill of rights either though
true, these guys know what they are doing. if it was something they were harassing him over that was more obvious then that’s definitely an issue, but a guy walking in the park with something that looks identical to whatever is the law where he is is kind of bullshit and childish. unless he is trying to see if they take it from him illegally after making contact but doing this in the first place just to try and make a scene knowing how complicated this specific set up is shows what type of guy he is. not even the top government decision makers know wtf their doing and what law changes each day so how can you expect these guys who have way better shit to do and actually deal with real armed criminals that probably started out as a call just like this to know what the new rule is today. when they go home at night they don’t just beat their dick to gun laws EVERY night just so they can answer each one of your audits perfectly. they know generally what is and isn’t legal, when it gets down to specifics you should be auditing the ATF. but we both know you’ll have your ass handed to you by fine print laws that even you don’t know. so you stick to wasting everyone’s time for content like this. fucking nerd.
Also: ran toward report of a man in a park full of kids with a rifle thinking they were going to get into a shootout with a maniac. Police handled it well. Once he was assessed as a non-threat and an idiot auditor, they have time to confirm this guy is legally circumventing the law which prohibits nearly exactly what he was doing; but loopholes it by having a piece of Velcro in the stock and a certain barrel length.
@@jefftc14 then you missed the whole point. Laws and regulations have become so ridiculous with guns and he is making it public not to mention, saving lives because of the potential for police officers to be unaware of said laws and regulations.
@@somewhatdamaged2946 Yea if I'm not allowed to go to a kids park with a RPG in my fucking fully auto MRAP then I don't have total freedom.... says only a clown who isn't serious...
If your In a park and a guy is walking around with a gun yeah I get it why they stormed his ass. Yes it's his right which shouldn't be infringed but also doesn't seem smart to do in general
@@joefrisco8025what don’t seem smart to one could be perfectly reasonable to someone else. It’s a right and absolutely shouldn’t be infringed upon, if they were concerned they could keep an eye on him and hang back, you know, police work
As an officer you should understand that in REALITY that is really NOT a pistol but the gun laws in this country are so messed up that we get to call that a pistol. I have plenty of guns and walking around a public park with a "rifle" where children play and families try to relax is definitely just acting like an asshole, especially with all the issues with guns we see in TV these days. So, I'll appreciate you as an officer try to preach more about not practicing this kind of behavior even if is still LEGAL to do it. Lets be civilize for once like a normal fking country.
That, by legal definition is a pistol. If it's legal to carry and the area he is in is not restricted then they should know the laws and not harassed. They, like me, had constitutional law and if they don't know then they shouldn't be policing until they go back and learn more about people's constitutional rights. The 2nd amendment is not a suggestion. Those officers need retraining.
Apparently, the city or state decided to outlaw rifles in that area, but not outlaw handguns. Probably so individuals, particularly women can protect themselves. But anyone may need protection. Would you feel better if the guy had a 17 round handgun under his jacket or even on his hip? @@eduardorubio3031
@@portzblitz Because they simply didn't! Watch the video. But to clarify, since you don't seem to know, clearing a firearm means 1) dropping the mag from te well, 2) racking the slide (or bolt in this case) to release any rounds in the chamber and 3) placing the safety on (if applicable).
He’s worried about laws. You can’t open carry a rifle, and without very close inspection of that firearm you can’t tell that it’s not a rifle. Feelings have nothing to do with this situation.
If if they can’t legally take your gun permanently they will still do it long enough to check it out and leave you defenseless again tyranny just so they can show you who’s boss and who’s in charge. It’s all about showing how much Power the government has they want to show dominance like “hey yeah look at me I just took your self defense tool and there’s nothing you can do about it until I decide to give it back to you After we are done with it those 5 guys feel tough because 1 man surrendered him weapon Willingly without even being asked or forced to 5 other guys with weapons them 5 standing there with their gun holding His gun with him standing there with nothing them doing this on their time THATS what they want That makes them feel real good and tough that’s what it’s all about
The fact that the guy asked if he had a tax stamp…mind boggling how ignorant they are to the federal gun laws. That’s you’re damn job! A lot of people (sometimes including myself) think these audit stunts are more harm than good but this one within the first 2 minutes shows you how ignorant they were to our rights under federal law.
@@ChadHuey79 They're cops. That's their job. You want to go to a surgeon who has to read WebMD and Wikipedia before opening up your chest, or one that knows it like the back of his hand. When civilians are better informed than the jackbooted thugs "enforcing" laws they don't even know do or don't exist, there's a big problem. If we screw up and do something illegal because we didn't know, we get thrown in prison and told ignorance is no excuse. Cops? They get a pay raise.
It is their job as police officers to carry a pistol. A random dude walking around with a PCC in a residential area will always look sketch. It’s just something you don’t do. So what if it’s legal. It’s out of the ordinary and looks really really bad. All these people testing cops and exercising their 2nd amendment are plain idiot that need to get jobs.
@Mental Gymnast let’s be real, those cops probably haven’t had an idiot walking around open carrying what looks to be a rifle from afar in like two years. I don’t blame them for stopping him. BEHAVIOR LIKE THIS IS OUTBOF THE ORDINARY. Only idiots flex their rights like this.
@macabremofo945 start stockpiling ammo and talk to any neighbors that agree. The 2nd amendment also protects the right to form a militia for the purpose of maintaining a free state. Just don't be stupid if you go that route
Imagine being stopped by the law in any other time in history for carrying a firearm. I used to have rifles in the gun rack of my trucks back while parked at my high school. The founders are rolling over in their graves for what this country has become. The more they stigmatize and ban guns, the more you need to be carrying one at all times!
It’s always happened People have been killed for carrying swords. Men have been killed just for being military age for thousands of years. This is not new lol
Until they confinscate it from you for acting in self defense, then they label you a felon for defending yourself & tell you to be thankful that the BlueCoats let you live..
@madrolla shush , high-school used to have indoor ranges. They would allowsrudents to carry on campus for tge purpose of indoor range training circa 1950's
The ATF could serve a good purpose. The problem is Democrats use it to restrict our rights through erroneous rule making. The problem is that the ATF, and other agencies, are allowed to basically make laws through "rulemaking." For any agency (supposed experts who are really just unelected and ideological administrators!) - For their rule to have the effect of law, the given set of rules should be sent back to the legislature for approval. In that way, politicians are accountable for all laws as intended rather than using an agency to circumvent the constitution. And there wouldn't be so much confusion while awaiting cases to work all the way to the Supreme Court. Very few rules would ever be granted the effect of law.
@@KevinBurdine-k4tyou lost me when you said “democrats”. Are we so far behind that we think the “republicans” represent our best interests? These people don’t care about our rights, it’s about control and money. Can you not see the deceitfulness behind all these “republicans” acting like they are against the “democrats” yet still restricting and voting against our rights?
You shouldn’t be walking around residential parks with a “pistol”. You backwoods idiots might get away with that, but here in the suburbs that is extremely out of the ordinary. I don’t blame these cops one bit for responding to the call. The guy that made video is an absolute idiot that needs to get a job and stop testing law enforcement. The only people that hate law enforcement are the ones breaking the laws, or this idiot walking around with PCC.
It's a shame that morons like this are what gun control advocates use as an example of "people who believe in 2nd amendment rights" to show to the average voter when they're pushing dumb gun control legislation. But this kinda thing also makes me understand why they vote for them, I sure as hell don't want this lunatic strolling my neighborhood with his "pistol" to see "who's gonna challenge his rights"
@@AllanPowell something never set right with me about that altered flag. Thank you for giving me a reason to question it further. It is completely wrong and this is how far the majority have slid. Things are being done so much so that it's almost a constant bombardment against what is the law. Wether GOD, man or moral. Question it or quietly accept.
I understand we have rights I do, but I never understood people putting themselves in dangerous situations by open carrying especially with an AR pistol platform. A lot of people don’t understand firearms and will always express caution.
There are thousands of laws. Cops didn't go to law school, they went to a 5 month academy with 2 weeks of that being a law block. Needless to say, they don't know all the laws.
@@POPJack1717 We’re not referring to obscure and antiquated laws. We’re referring to the basics. They know those laws and often enforce them falsely and punitively. Would you tolerate your plumber or roofer not knowing their job and make excuses for them as water infiltrates your home? Doubtful. These are people playing a game of life and death with human beings on a daily basis. Be it financially or with bullets, people’s lives are at stake and people like you let them off with an excuse. Wait until it happened to you.
@@tinfoilsombrero1439 like I said, they don't know all of the laws hence why they had to look up what an AR pistol was. My point still stands, they don't know all of the laws and do time to time act while being completely uninformed on said laws. Which is why you have people like the guy in the video who do what they do to 'educate' the police. Hell, not even attorneys know all of the laws and you expect the police to with 2 weeks of law block from the academy??? You can't expect the police to be attorneys and also be apart of the Defund the Police movement. Takes money to keep officers trained and updated on the ever changing laws, procedures, etc. Can't have it both ways.
Yeah it's a shame that they have to look up something they should know. But I'm completely for them doing a google search to tell them they're wrong. It's better than them assuming and taking him into custody. Playing devil's advocate, some of the best doctors are constantly google searching to find answers. There's just so much info out there.
Just shows that the laws are getting so ridiculous and so many are being added and refined so often that they can't even keep up with all that shit anymore ...
Attorneys with college degrees often have to review the law because there are so many, no one individual can truly remember them all. Have the expectation that cops are geniuses while giving them the respect of being stupid. You’re the one who has no logic.
You don't know what you're talking about. They weren't looking up the law. They were looking up the gun to verify that it was indeed classified as a pistol. No matter how well the officers know the law it would be asinine to expect them to know the details of every one of the tens of thousands of different guns out there. The officers got a call about someone carrying a rifle. They had no choice but to respond and check it out. It's interesting to note that the end of this "incident" was not shared. Probably because after determining the guy was within his rights to be carrying the firearm the officers handed the gun back to him and walked away.
As a Missourian in 2021, it makes me happy to know that this action would have resulted in a $50k fine per officer, under our now-in-effect Second Amendment Protection Act. Local and state police can no longer enforce federal firearms law, only state law, of which we have very little. If the feds want to enforce their regulations, they're free to do so, they just can't force the locals to pay for it any more.
@@ANONisEVERYTHINGno, you need them for sbr's as well. But this was a pistol, as classified by the atf. Therefore, no tax stamp required. Even if it wasn an sbr though, they dont have the authority to require that he show them the tax stamp. And if he showed them a tax stamp, they dont have the ability to check if its even real. They are just harrassing the guy.
@Christian Constitutionalist I said that to a local cop when his wheels began to come off of his argument. He turned the color of a beet. I thought he was going to stroke out. 🤞🏻
@@AllanPowell Wrong. every officer I know is a strong 2A supporter, and believes the gun laws especially here in MA are nothing short of egregious. They are not trained to have any kind of negative mentality toward civilians. This case represents to me a group of uninformed officers, nothing more. Not all cops are gun nuts, you can't blame them for not knowing what an AR pistol is, but they did handle the situation poorly. That being said, stating that they're trained a certain way to be against civilians is ignorant, and objectively inaccurate.
*The issue is that everyone wanted their personal souvenir letter from the ATF to justify their brace.* Pistol braces were hardly on the ATF's radar until people started doing silly stuff like this. Then it's banned, unbanned, re-banned, reunbanned.... etc....
@@Hypnotically_Caucasian Hard disagree. Most people who are in the middle don’t see this and have the “oh look a man with a gun that didn’t do anything wrong, I guess guns are fine.” They see this and say “insane that it’s legal, it shouldn’t be.” It harms us.
That's actually really disturbing that police officers don't know the law. I don't expect them to be able to quote penal codes but they should know whether someone is breaking the law or not without having to make contact. Just like watching someone drive by that has legal tags and is doing the speed limit.
Most cops just hate for civilians to have guns for some reason... Hell, even knives. I've had cops on campus follow me around because I had a folding knife on my pocket. Lol.
The most disturbing part wasn’t that he was open carrying a AR around a bunch of kids and ppl in a park??? Regardless of his intent that is irrational especially considering the amount of mass shooting taking place on the daily in this country.
Ok well I see the cops aren’t the best but this guy ain’t right either why would you go walking around with a rifle looking gun or even something like this at all next to kids playing sports.
To be fair, braces look a lot like stocks, and are practically used as stocks by many people. What we really need is to remove SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs from the NFA.
true, these guys know what they are doing. if it was something they were harassing him over that was more obvious then that’s definitely an issue, but a guy walking in the park with something that looks identical to whatever is the law where he is is kind of bullshit and childish. unless he is trying to see if they take it from him illegally after making contact but doing this in the first place just to try and make a scene knowing how complicated this specific set up is shows what type of guy he is. not even the top government decision makers know wtf their doing and what law changes each day so how can you expect these guys who have way better shit to do and actually deal with real armed criminals that probably started out as a call just like this to know what the new rule is today. when they go home at night they don’t just beat their dick to gun laws EVERY night just so they can answer each one of your audits perfectly. they know generally what is and isn’t legal, when it gets down to specifics you should be auditing the ATF. but we both know you’ll have your ass handed to you by fine print laws that even you don’t know. so you stick to wasting everyone’s time for content like this. fucking nerd.
I don’t see anything wrong with short barreled weapons honestly, as long as it’s tax stamped, and not in the hands of an idiot. Distance is calibrated by rifling, and mobility is calibrated by stock or brace. I don’t even know why I’m typing this anymore i forgot the atf banned braces- I forgot where I was going with this honestly. This comments over a year old, my apologies
This is embarrassing for this department. As far back as 2010, all of my friends who were cops not only had AR pistols themselves, but were familiar with the actual laws in regards to firearms and what constituted what. These guys are acting like they're hearing this stuff for the first time in their life.
Most officers are not familiar with the laws they enforce. They all seem to have "masters degrees" from online universities yet they cannot understand the simplest of concepts. To be fair, a small number of officers are quite sharp but the vast majority are a dissapointment. Why? Study the recruitment process, the kinds of personalities that gravitate toward the profession, and very important, how people are promoted within the profession.
@@ekimnamdets6946ecause they hire kids right out of high school man. It’s all about who you know. These kids don’t have real life experience, yet they’re supposed to make adult decisions in real world scenarios. I’m a paramedic, and I can’t tell you how many times we’ve called law enforcement for them to show up and just walk around with their hands in their vest and not take charge on scenes. I literally chuckle when I see some of them show up and how young and innocent they look. Ive had to take charge on a lot of calls to de escalate tensions with people, even though law enforcement was there for that reason, but they stand around with their thumbs up their ass just looking clueless. It’s the reason I carry on my job, even though I’m not supposed to because little 20 year old Joey right out of high school doesn’t know how to be a man and do his job when Ems or fire request him.
Shameful. As an LEO I am absolutely embarrassed at their utter ignorance and questioning of your right to exercise your freedoms guaranteed to by the Bill of Rights. Absolutely shameful. Unfortunately there are many anti-constitutional LEOs out there. You did a great job of remaining calm and respectful despite their unprofessional behavior.
@2:14 THE WORST PART OF THE VID: when multiple police pull out there cell phones to look up info, likely on google or wikipedia, because they know nothing about what's in front of them... when you see 6 LAW ENFORCEMENT officers that don't know more than a random citizen, it shows you why law enforcement is just a big of a problem for citizens as criminals are for citizens
@@PeteRoe Its more terrifying and disturbing that they did that than funny. AR pistols have been around for a long time and people have been building them for awhile. The fact that several LEOs don't know what it is scares me. They all carry an AR in their car and practice with them.. they should know who CMMG is as well. Unfortunately we have to use this "brace" and classify it as a pistol because of stupid laws that should have never been fabricated in the first place. If law abiding citizens lost their right to own guns like this it would open the door up to many bad things. Just remember that criminal that now knows you have no protection will have a full automatic m4...
Cops do that a LOT when trying to come up with charges. The job has an IQ cap that hovers around average. Any drift from that goes to below-average. Someone who deserves applause for grasping basic algebra is then a few weeks of training in how to apply the law in the real world with real people.
So let me get this straight, they are upset with effectively making a pistol longer? So legal pistol that's easily concealable is ok, but somehow becomes more dangerous by adding bulk? Yeah ok, keep pretending like any of this is for public safety. If it was then they already would have used statistics of crimes to ban them. Instead they issue "Guidelines" with no actual guidance, using subjective terms maybe & might. Nothing says public safety like not explaining how to comply.
it's the manufacturers lying to consumers about legality of their products that's the problem in their eyes. Pistols can be longer but shouldn't be shouldered like a rifle. They can't ban them because of the ADA so don't worry about that. If they caught you with a home build they'd more likely tell you to make it compliant or register it than charge you unless you were already getting charged with some sort of violent crime.
I don't entirely disagree, but the way they wrote the guidelines, it's subjective & up to chance as to if your complying over arbitrary thoughts. My main point was they vilified SBRs due to concealability, but concealable pistols are totally fine? Unless ofcourse you add a horseshoe pc of plastic to the rear? Also was noting they aren't plastering statistics because they don't support their argument. I dont think they should punish companies for skirting the line, its not illegal, many conversations were documented, & lets be honest the gov skirts the line 24/7. Best wishes & stay safe.
@@pmanameless8184 All of those are valid points. The NFA is unconstitutional as a whole but as long as mass compliance exists so do their regulations and power. They're really just cracking down on manufacturers from false advertising stuff as ATF approved and trying to keep them from selling pistol brace equipped firearms as approved that wouldn't be. For the individual gun owners that bought them in good faith they wouldn't be able to jump to prosecution they would just say "make it compliant, send pictures so we can close this and move on" if they didn't just flat out waive the tax if you chose to register and throw a real stock on it.
@@AllanPowell Agreed. I guess my problem is the trust part, the Kelland Wright case & also a few videos on YT of CA Leo's getting warrants to search homes of AW applicants are very concerning(plenty more). In CA they made citizens register legally owned weapons for new laws, & then tried to/did bust them for said weapon during review process they made them apply for. In my mind ATF does the same stuff, in the Wright case they tried enforcing very specific regulations that were never shared, even worse is it actually did abide by the unknown reg & they tried to measure diagonally against their own rules to make it stick. Its disgusting to me, & here it seems they have no justified reason to pursue this further, but they will. Compliancy is a killer. Thank you for having a civil conversation, way too much arguing these days. Have a good night.
Didn’t you know bullets out of a firearm all become “more deadlier” (scientific term) the more points of contact the weapon has with the body ?! That’s why AOW are regulated with “foregrips”..,Makes 9mm able to blow through 10 buildings and we won’t even talk about a short shotgun with a grip!! Heavens know !!!🥴😒🙄
I’m sorry, but this is just dumb. Just because you have the right to do something doesn’t mean you should. Save the big guns for when they are appropriate and conceal a pistol like the rest of us.
Dude exactly. I Carry concealed every day. I'm not walking around with an ar pistol just to cause trouble. This just makes the rest of us look bad. I really hate these "audits" guys. They literally have nothing else going on in their lives.
@@jonathanbrightwell272 It’s like the people who say the most obnoxious shit and then claim their First Amendment right to say it. Lol. Just because you have the right to say whatever you please doesn’t mean that speech is consequence-free. In today’s world, this dude is lucky he didn’t get blasted.
I'm glad I'm not the only one completely baffled by this senseless audit. If the blasting did indeed start there were kids there that could've gotten crossfire. This wasn't thought through, pointless, stupid, and selfish.
@@nileshsharma9220 Do you support the 2A because it broadly minimizes the use of violence as a means of resolving conflict, or are you out for blood and using 2A preservation as a justification for getting it? I ask because those are two vastly different motivations. These audits are merely provocations and publicity stunts, which is why they are always done with specific firearms (AR Platform), and are always posted on social media. The inherent risks that come with doing these audits far outweigh any potential benefits. There are clearly better ways to advocate for our rights, ways that don’t involve a potential shootout….unless that’s what you’re looking for….
“Thank you for causing a panic!”.... No one was panicking accept the officer initially addressing this legally armed citizen. “Do you have a federal tax stamp?”... Well, The citizen should not have had to explain this to the officer... In essence, they will not be happy until we are all compliant servants not free citizens.
The answer to that is" Are you a ATF agent, only an ATF agent can ask me if I have a tax stamp. You not being an ATF agent cannot touch this if I do have a tax stamp."
@@AllanPowell officers are not exempt from the NFA, Authorized departments can file a form with the ATF and be cleared for Machine guns and SBRs, and then issue them to the officer. But personal weapons, weapons used not in an official capacity, and retired/former officers are all subject to the NFA. It is important for officers to realize this as well, the majority are civilians when not on duty, all the more important to protect and defend the constitution and not your boss, colleague if they are opposed to it.
@@knottywoodoutdoors4932 Yet officers, in many times out of department requirements, carry these NFA exempt weapons when off duty, in their vehicles or wherever.... Almost making them personally exempt by proxy.
If I was a cop on duty during this incident I would’ve cleared the weapon and ran the serial number in the database. Make sure it’s not stolen and manufactured as a pistol lower receiver. If it’s not manufactured as a pistol than it’s illegal. There’s a difference between a lower manufactured as a rifle and pistol. A pistol lower can be turned into a sbr legally, but a rifle lower cannot be made into a pistol. A rifle lower can only be turned into an sbr.
thats where you are wrong, there is a reason AR lowers nowadays are marked "multi cal", they are just lowers, it is up to the builder/owner to follow unconstitutional regs
@@maxtheroofer8004 True, but… caliber doesn’t matter when it’s manufactured. You could buy a Colt 6920 cambered in 5.56 and slap a 300 blackout barrel on it and it wouldn’t change the classification. It’s still a rifle. Even though that pistol in the video is cambered in 9mm you’d still have to run the serial number to make sure it is in fact a pistol. It could be an illegal SBR with a brace. ALWAYS run serial numbers. Caliber doesn’t matter.
Idk why it Bugs me when people call themselves auditors . Weather it’s the ones who just go and record buildings to make people uncomfortable and call the police or the ones who legally open carry AR style pistols . Like I vote republican I have guns im about free speech but just the smugness of calling yourself an auditor when your a civilian with a camera and a RUclips channel anyone can do it. a real auditor has credentials and gets hired by a company or the government.
So he had a pistol, potentially strapped to his arm, at a park where kids were playing. Is it reasonable to expect the reasonable person to conclude that an individual with a weapon of that nature is merely exercising their second amendment rights? If that is the precedent, then what stops any individual with malicious intent from leveraging that precedent to situate their selves in a public space, unharassed, to carry out malicious intent? More guns? Does every law abiding citizen need to bring a similar weapon with them to a baseball field? I am a firm second amendment supporter, but the premise of auditing the police on the second amendment in a place where children are playing is selfish and asinine. Be a decent human being and run your audit in a place less conspicuous preferably with no children next time. All this scenario would've needed to potentially cause a lot of harm is another lawfully bearing citizen spooked into shooting first and asking questions later.
they are only hired if they score under a certain level in their aptitude tests. There was a court battle over this and the prospective officer was denied a job due to scoring too highly. The courts upheld this and he was prevented from being a cop for being too smart. this is the country we live in, it is by design. They don't want them thinking for themselves
I see a guy walking through a public park carrying that, I am gonna assume they are an active shooter threat and shoot them before they can get a chance. I'm all for gun rights but idiots that go out attention seeking like this cause mass panic for people walking in the park. Normal people in this day and age are gonna believe the individual is there to cause harm.
@@bstreet2391dumb statement, if the guys walking through the park and you hear zero gun fire, you’re saying you’d shoot him just because he’s holding a gun? And you’re assuming he’s the crazy person?
@@bstreet2391He wasn’t carrying it, that’s an important distinction. He had it slung across his back, I probably would at least draw on someone with any gun IN THEIR HANDS, but holstered or slung I’ll probably just start talking with them about their gun.
To be fair, the ATF puts out stupid regulations and classifications all the time. Even as a gun owner it's hard to keep up with their bullcrap. In all practicality, that's a rifle. It's just the ATF's stupidity that labels it a "pistol." Even so, by the videoer's own admission he was just doing it to "educate" the police by causing public panic. I'm all for the second amendment but using it to intentionally cause a scene only makes people hate guns more. You'll never change the stigma about guns by using them to incite panic. Be a responsible gun owner. As far as the cops go, if someone is reportedly walking around with a gun around kids, they need to be cautious and make sure everything is okay. I'd prefer cops like these being vigilant and ensuring everything is legal rather than the uvalde cops. Yes, they should study up on gun laws, but they're not ATF officers, so they're not going to know every gun law on the spot because they usually don't deal with classifying guns or taking them unless they're involved in a crime. I know many people want reasons to hate cops but take a moment to put yourself in their shoes. If you got a call that someone was in the park with your child carrying a gun and walking around suspiciously, would you not care? Would you say "well I'm sure he's just exercising his second amendment rights" or would you make sure everything is safe and this person isn't a threat first then say it's their right? Too often we like to place blame on cops who are just people with a job that is intense and dangerous, yet we act like they're the ones that made the laws they're sworn to uphold. In this case they looked up the laws and everything was fine. They didn't shoot the guy or beat him or do anything out of line. And lastly, the ATF is an unconstitutional organization that's against the second amendment and they should be dissolved. Their regulations and classifications are made by people who have no firearm knowledge or experience whatsoever.
if joe public sees guns every day they are not going to panic. when I was a kid EVERY pickup had a gunrack in the back window often filled with a deer rifle and a shotgun for ducks. no one blinked an eye. now that you hid your guns joe public loses his shit when he sees one. hiding it created the issue.
@DanOfTheWild you mean like combat vets like Pat Mac, Warrior Poet, and Tu Lam just to name a few. Yeah those cowards? Those guys did more for this country and our rights than your fat ass could even dream of!
@DanOfTheWild Well it’s true, too many videos of open carriers getting taken out first or just having their gun taken away for not being aware of their surroundings, conceal carry is definitely a better option for getting the drop on someone.
I am amazed at the amount of Leo's that don't know guns and gun laws. Not that I like to hear people boast on forever and give me the history over each and every gun they ever owned or shot but I also don't like to see unbelievable ignorance over something that should be common knowledge among them, second nature..
I don't get it. Even if it had a stock on it, instead of a brace, they STILL don't have the authority to take it from him without an ATF agent on scene...
They didn't take it. They were examining it. Not everything has to be a fight. They showed respect and restraint and just because the law makers give them shit training, doesn't make it their fault.
@@no_handle_required They did illegally disarm this guy. He broke no laws, and was minding his own business. He didn't fight. They treated him disrespectfully with the ignorance of law, their attitude and snide remarks. Bringing up "the children" and tax stamp. And they are the enforcers of the law, they need to get at least as much training as a non leo citizen, on their own if need be. As one other poster said, ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Wow the first cop on sight pointed his gun at him with his finger on the trigger and terrifyingly he kept his finger on the trigger when he was holding the gun one handed.
These clowns are all Barney Fifes. Their uniforms look like Halloween costumes. Goes to prove the argument that many civilians train more and exhibit better firearm safety habits than LEOs.
This is one of those, just because I can do it doesn't mean it's a good plan to do it. I'll open carry all day long in the back country or in my own house but out in the public it's just way less headache to carry concealed. This is a solution looking for a problem, as near as I can tell.
Exactly. Thats what i say with all these amendment auditors. All they are doing is looking to stir up trouble on purpose. To catch cops not knowing things. Who cares! There is no scenario anyways where you need to carry this pistol in public. Conceal a regular sized small one instead.
I think gun owners have an unwritten obligation to be responsible in their actions, and to show good judgement. Showing up to a public park where kids play with an AR pistol, with the intent to elicit a response from concerned parents and law enforcement just to prove a legal point, demonstrates a clear lack of responsibility and common sense. Frankly I wouldn’t trust this man with a firearm.
To be fair given the amount of mass shootings over there they have every right to be a bit skeptical and worried. Why is he walking around with a rifle AKA pistol carbine with children all over the place you're asking for trouble.
The fact that the first officer has his rifle at the low ready, eyeing you up and kind of pointing it at you would definitely feel like threat more then anything.
Well, when you have a guy randomly walking around in a park with a gun that appears like that, what do you think they're suppose to do at first glance? BTW, I'm far from a bootlicker. It's kinda like the kid walking around on the roof at a presidential rally with a rifle in Pennsylvania. At this point, the cops are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Not a fan of how either party conducted themselves.. the first officer made some pretty snide remarks and was very "us vs them". That said they're just doing there duty I mean it's weird for a citizen to patrol a park with a braced pistol. As a father of 3 kids and a total 2a supporter/gun fanatic I'd be quite cautious if I saw someone walking around with that pistol at a park... idk. Is what it is.
Yep 12 months in my town to become a street rest officer and we have a fuck ton of morons with badges who barely can spell yet alone know laws.. we also have an awkward amount of police involved shootings of unarmed people..
What is he trying to prove here exactly, that he can scare people? I'm not saying he shouldn't be able to do this or that it should be illegal for anyone to do it. I'm saying only a tool of epic proportions would WANT to do something like this. This Makes the whole community look bad.
EXACTLY! When the pistol brace issue first came around and ATH=F issued their memo/"ruling" about them being legal, gun owners should have just said cool, and gone about their business enjoying the win. But then people like this push the issue drawing unneeded attention. Then ATF issues a memo saying the inadvertently shouldering a brace is okay. Again, gun owners should have just said "cool" and gon about their business. BUT, every swinging dick with a brace jumps on youtube posting videos of them intentionally shouldering the braces and thumbing their noses at "the man". WTF did they think would happen? Now look at the situation, it is a direct result and the fault of those who like to "poke the bear" for no good reason. Don't get me wrong, I believe in fighting the good fight, but it pays to pick your battles and to not start a fight when it is not needed and serves no real purpose. ALSO, even if it were just standard pistol (Glock, Sig, etc) walking around with it in your hand or displayed in the open other than carried legally in a holster (per whatever state's laws), in a park where families and kids are present could be a cause for alarm.
@@mddrudgeif people don’t’poke the bear”, then the Issues of Infringements never gets brought up in court, and never gets settled on. And for the recourd, the ATF is NOT the bear being poked;, the American People are the Bear, and the ATF Rats are gnawing at our paws while we pretend to sleep… Stop pretending to sleep, and wake up with the rest of us.
@@mddrudge no, you don't believe in "fighting the good fight." You seem more like the "yes, daddy," beta type. If the man is carrying within the law, let him carry and leave him alone. Who are you to dictate how others should carry? Someone that exercises a right in a way YOU don't like shouldn't be denigrated. You don't have to carry in the same manner he does just like he isn't relegated to whatever form of carry you, and every other judgmental gun snob like you, choose. Also, stop with the asinine and emotional platitudes, what ifs, and whataboutisms. You sound like the mad mommies. "What about the children! Think of the children!" What about them? They should be exposed to and educated about firearms at a young age. They should also be taught that we have the right to carry and if they encounter someone carrying, they're just exercising their rights. If it's holstered/slung, go on about your day. Stop immediately thinking the worst. That very person could end up saving the lives of those children. Rights don't end where your feelings begin. If you come at me with something as ridiculous as "the children," I'm going to respond with the words of the late, great, George Carlin: "Fu*k the children." The guy in the video is a good friend of mine named Tim Harper. He's done more to advance gun rights in the state of Oklahoma than many others could ever hope to do. This incident happened at Hafer Park in Edmond, Oklahoma. The agency in the video is the Edmond PD.
I fully understand what your doing… On the other hand this really is uncalled for to be in public doing shit like this. Basically putting it in the public eye for no reason.
I can't stress this enough. I am pro LEO, BUT so many cops . 1. Don't know what they don't know . 2. Will enforce only what they think they know. 3. Will follow orders . Not one of these cops new what this firearm was ... Not one
Children have been killed playing with pellet guns by cops. This also scares people with kids bc looks like u bout to do a mass shooting. It’s rude, and unethical and unnecessary. I own guns.
Exactly! We live in a time where too many mentally ill people are running around. Moms and families see a "man with a gun" not a "guy doing an audit". Being from inner-City Philly, people would assume bad stuff first. These "audits" are not helpful at all.
As a native European, I see this as a protest against the disarmament of responsible, law-abiding gun owners, highlighting the importance of safeguarding individual freedoms. I have great respect for the founders of your nation, who intended for it to be a place of true personal liberty. The situation in the UK serves as a cautionary example of how restrictive policies can deteriorate into an unfavorable state of affairs. While i truly empathize with the victims of gun violence and understand their perspectives, I believe the root issue isn't guns themselves. The real problem lies in the widespread neglect of the mental health crisis affecting the Western world. It's not the guns that kill, it's people. Even if firearms are taken away, individuals struggling with severe mental health issues will still find other means to commit harmful and dark deeds. Addressing the underlying mental health challenges is the key to preventing such tragedies. God bless America, and God bless Europe. God bless us all.
i mean , yes the 2nd amendment . but why walk around the park with a pcc ? the amount of concerns will peak . it was the same with that black dude fully geared up in black with a mask and a glock on the front on his vest . and with the amount of active mass shooters in usa i mean come on guys . common sense is that hard to unlock ?
I understand that it's a matter of definition, and I see your point of view, but come on. Would you not feel any type of discomfort seeing a dude walking around with what appears to be a rifle, openly, in a public park where kids often are? Has there not been enough shootings in America to put even the slightest concern in your minds when seeing someone armed to the teeth calling a cow a chicken just because a gray zone in the law defines it as such?
You have a right to do something But the police also have a obligation to investigate suspicious stuff. And if you wander around the park wiith an ar pistol out in the open its slightly abnormal. Just because you have the right to do something. Doesn't mean people won't be concerned and call the police. And don't be surprised when called sometimes the police show up. Also no surprise sometimes they don't really know the law. That's why they're not judges thank God.
LOL! I openly carry my deer hunting rifle on logging roads and in the woods all the time! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What else am i going to do? Shove it down my pants!?!? 🤣
Always since the second amendment was written have American citizens been able too legally carry weapons! Pistols, rifles etc doesn’t matter. That’s your right to do so without persecution from the government!
Also foolish to create an uprising for no purpose other than just to test the response. This is why some people view gun enthusiasts negatively. I understand the purpose, but it’s creating a stir unnecessarily
Imagine our founding fathers seeing this. Cops tell a civilian he can't carry a certain firearm while they are carrying that certain firearm.
RIGHT! A civilian should have every right held by the government (excluding a war department that is oathed not to operate within US boarders).
what low IQ take is this....... whoever made this post is either a bot or a legit fucking retard who thinks saying the word tyrant and not wearing mask = patriotism..
this dude literally walked around the park with. a. fucking. RIFLE! "pistol" brace or not- that is a bad idea.. he is lucky they were so nice and didn't beat him half to death....
stuff like this is why I am slowly growing to hate the "gun community"/"2a community", it's basically just a bunch of spregs and boomers who think joining the NRA and using the ATF meme endlessly means you are supporting and fighting for 2a rights..
Guns will never be banned.. you don't need to get in a facebook group to fight for that right!
People in the a2 community who think like this are like people who think say the N-word and then say "Freedom of speech!"
You just look like a fucking idiot and make the rest of us look bad..
Please stay on facebook and quit deluding the gene pool.
get fixed.
This is exactly what I tell Liberals who are anti-gun - you want ONLY the cops to carry AR-15s?! Are you kidding?! They already run around with impunity.
Tbh quite a few would have been fine with it, since those were the ones who wanted George Washington to have more power and were fine with using the army to enforce the whiskey tax. Those founding fathers were also not particularly fond of the bill of rights either though
@@greenbrickbox3392 Clearly you don't understand WHY they were not fond of the bill of rights.
Police: “We’re here to enforce the law.”
Also police: “We don’t know what the law is.”
What law, the only law enforce is the 2nd amendment and constitution right.
👍👍💪💪🔥
true, these guys know what they are doing. if it was something they were harassing him over that was more obvious then that’s definitely an issue, but a guy walking in the park with something that looks identical to whatever is the law where he is is kind of bullshit and childish. unless he is trying to see if they take it from him illegally after making contact but doing this in the first place just to try and make a scene knowing how complicated this specific set up is shows what type of guy he is. not even the top government decision makers know wtf their doing and what law changes each day so how can you expect these guys who have way better shit to do and actually deal with real armed criminals that probably started out as a call just like this to know what the new rule is today. when they go home at night they don’t just beat their dick to gun laws EVERY night just so they can answer each one of your audits perfectly. they know generally what is and isn’t legal, when it gets down to specifics you should be auditing the ATF. but we both know you’ll have your ass handed to you by fine print laws that even you don’t know. so you stick to wasting everyone’s time for content like this. fucking nerd.
Also: ran toward report of a man in a park full of kids with a rifle thinking they were going to get into a shootout with a maniac. Police handled it well. Once he was assessed as a non-threat and an idiot auditor, they have time to confirm this guy is legally circumventing the law which prohibits nearly exactly what he was doing; but loopholes it by having a piece of Velcro in the stock and a certain barrel length.
@@SixaughtSix holy fuck you are not bright at all😂
"What is your reason for exercising your rights?" -every tyrant ever.
Don't go looking for sht, it'll find you. -Wise man
I mean most people exercise their rights normally not getting deck'd out like Rambo and then going into a park LOL
@@jefftc14 Eggzackly, like these auditor clowns screwin with cops, stupid to the 10th power.
@@jefftc14 then you missed the whole point. Laws and regulations have become so ridiculous with guns and he is making it public not to mention, saving lives because of the potential for police officers to be unaware of said laws and regulations.
@@somewhatdamaged2946 Yea if I'm not allowed to go to a kids park with a RPG in my fucking fully auto MRAP then I don't have total freedom.... says only a clown who isn't serious...
Them not clearing the weapon a single time shows you everything you need to know.
just unbelievable
Didn't even remove the magazine 😂
Facts. Non military cops
@2:13 he grabs the weapon and immediately flags his partner with it... you can see his partner try to step closer to get out of line of fire!
First thing I noticed.
Be sure to remind the officers that "Ignorance of the law is not an excuse."
Unless your a citizen
It is for them, it’s called qualified immunity
If your In a park and a guy is walking around with a gun yeah I get it why they stormed his ass. Yes it's his right which shouldn't be infringed but also doesn't seem smart to do in general
@@joefrisco8025 we might be thinking of different types of parks
@@joefrisco8025what don’t seem smart to one could be perfectly reasonable to someone else.
It’s a right and absolutely shouldn’t be infringed upon, if they were concerned they could keep an eye on him and hang back, you know, police work
As a police officer i have to say thier knowledge of the difference between a pistol and a rifle is an embarrassment.
As an officer you should understand that in REALITY that is really NOT a pistol but the gun laws in this country are so messed up that we get to call that a pistol. I have plenty of guns and walking around a public park with a "rifle" where children play and families try to relax is definitely just acting like an asshole, especially with all the issues with guns we see in TV these days. So, I'll appreciate you as an officer try to preach more about not practicing this kind of behavior even if is still LEGAL to do it. Lets be civilize for once like a normal fking country.
That, by legal definition is a pistol. If it's legal to carry and the area he is in is not restricted then they should know the laws and not harassed. They, like me, had constitutional law and if they don't know then they shouldn't be policing until they go back and learn more about people's constitutional rights. The 2nd amendment is not a suggestion. Those officers need retraining.
@@kenthomas3389 yeah you are for sure not a police officer or just a brain dead one that can’t understand common sense.
Apparently, the city or state decided to outlaw rifles in that area, but not outlaw handguns. Probably so individuals, particularly women can protect themselves. But anyone may need protection. Would you feel better if the guy had a 17 round handgun under his jacket or even on his hip? @@eduardorubio3031
@@kenthomas3389they flagged that poor man down 😂😂😂
I like how nobody cleared the weapon.
How do you know they didn't first thing?
One thing you can say about all cops is all cops are bad. Good people don’t last in “law” enFORCEment.
@@portzblitz Because they simply didn't! Watch the video.
But to clarify, since you don't seem to know, clearing a firearm means 1) dropping the mag from te well, 2) racking the slide (or bolt in this case) to release any rounds in the chamber and 3) placing the safety on (if applicable).
@@portzblitz because we actually watched the video. Try it
Nobody should have touched the weapon. They had no right to.
I can't believe the officers were so clueless about AR pistols.
Being a LEO doesn't mean a thing. You have to be in the gun world
@@Anzomax2 if you carry a firearm, in this case some of the LEO have rifles, and you enforce laws, then you SHOULD DEFINITELY understand firearm laws.
@@bobbye7353 they are not ATF agents
@@Anzomax2 really?! No way!? Wow?! 🤡
That’s America’s legal system. Young dumb and impressionable.
The first cops seems to be worried about feelings not laws
He’s worried about laws. You can’t open carry a rifle, and without very close inspection of that firearm you can’t tell that it’s not a rifle. Feelings have nothing to do with this situation.
Weak Men Create Hard Times.
@@domi69ifyHe Aint Worried About No Laws. 😂
If a police officer is ever holding our weapons. Thats an issue.
If if they can’t legally take your gun permanently they will still do it long enough to check it out and leave you defenseless again tyranny just so they can show you who’s boss and who’s in charge. It’s all about showing how much Power the government has they want to show dominance like “hey yeah look at me I just took your self defense tool and there’s nothing you can do about it until I decide to give it back to you After we are done with it those 5 guys feel tough because 1 man surrendered him weapon Willingly without even being asked or forced to 5 other guys with weapons them 5 standing there with their gun holding His gun with him standing there with nothing them doing this on their time THATS what they want That makes them feel real good and tough that’s what it’s all about
'ur not kidding
Give them hot lead, not your rifle or pistol...
Amen
Exactly! Swapsies for a few....sure. My life is no less than yours! PERIOD!!!
The fact that the guy asked if he had a tax stamp…mind boggling how ignorant they are to the federal gun laws. That’s you’re damn job! A lot of people (sometimes including myself) think these audit stunts are more harm than good but this one within the first 2 minutes shows you how ignorant they were to our rights under federal law.
Lmao tax stamp. Another made up rule…
Only harm it causes is us the people paying for the lawsuits and cops walking free and clear with violating people's rights
@@cang9313 or it’s just plain old tyranny no extra toppings gotta be put on this…. It’s tyranny
Yeah, yer not good with audits when they hurt YOUR FEELINGS and what YOU THINK SHOULD OR SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED....Typical 2 faced republican....
I almost died laughing when he asked about the tax stamp, then I realized it wasn’t funny.
I like how all the cops are still gripping their weapons whilst this man is disarmed.
They need the feeling of power.
@@jen2076 true, and they are idiots
I laughed out loud when they whipped out their iPhones to google search pistol braces. 😂
Pink iPhone!
Remember, they only have to have a GED or high-school diploma.
@@thepope9794 No excuse for not knowing the law.
@@ninja5672you tell me what the law is verbatim? Without looking it up.
@@ChadHuey79 They're cops. That's their job. You want to go to a surgeon who has to read WebMD and Wikipedia before opening up your chest, or one that knows it like the back of his hand. When civilians are better informed than the jackbooted thugs "enforcing" laws they don't even know do or don't exist, there's a big problem. If we screw up and do something illegal because we didn't know, we get thrown in prison and told ignorance is no excuse. Cops? They get a pay raise.
I hate when cops try and lecture. It's especially obnoxious when they are lecturing people on things like, "optics" when there is no law broken.
Copsplain. even if they have no idea what they are talking about "let me esplain somethin to jeww Lucy".
Just walk away. Am i under arrest? Piece out bitch
"Well I appreciate you causing a panic" killed me😭😭😭
Shaming and gaslighting people for practicing their God given rights makes me so genuinely angry.
@@zombifiedpariah7392 These cops think they're cool.
@@zombifiedpariah7392He’s purposely wasting time, how is that something you can support?
@@baconfacegamer792Agreed. I’m all for 2A right. This kind of audit bullshit makes us all look BAD.
@@baconfacegamer792if he exposed ignorant cops and they got educated on our rights, how is that a waste of time?
Gotta love all the insults the cops throw at the law abiding citizen for carrying a pistol.... while carrying pistols 🤦🏻♂️
It looked like the cops had SBR's. Because as we all know, laws don't apply to cops
Zero self awareness. Exactly what we need from those "enforcing the law". Said no one ever
dirty pigs
It is their job as police officers to carry a pistol. A random dude walking around with a PCC in a residential area will always look sketch. It’s just something you don’t do. So what if it’s legal. It’s out of the ordinary and looks really really bad. All these people testing cops and exercising their 2nd amendment are plain idiot that need to get jobs.
@Mental Gymnast let’s be real, those cops probably haven’t had an idiot walking around open carrying what looks to be a rifle from afar in like two years. I don’t blame them for stopping him. BEHAVIOR LIKE THIS IS OUTBOF THE ORDINARY. Only idiots flex their rights like this.
They're killng 2A with a thousand cuts.
That's exactly what they're doing.
If it's unconstitutional, disobey it. That's how the second amendment lives on from generation to generation.
I would die to protect our 2nd amendment, I just don't know where to start.
@@macabremofo945 anti-2A politicians, judges, lawyers of course, the _tyrants and the tyrants enforcers_
@macabremofo945 start stockpiling ammo and talk to any neighbors that agree. The 2nd amendment also protects the right to form a militia for the purpose of maintaining a free state. Just don't be stupid if you go that route
Imagine being stopped by the law in any other time in history for carrying a firearm. I used to have rifles in the gun rack of my trucks back while parked at my high school. The founders are rolling over in their graves for what this country has become. The more they stigmatize and ban guns, the more you need to be carrying one at all times!
It’s always happened
People have been killed for carrying swords. Men have been killed just for being military age for thousands of years. This is not new lol
@@madrolla Well, yeah….by tyrant governments. You completely missed my point huh.
@@madrolla so, you support that happening?
Until they confinscate it from you for acting in self defense, then they label you a felon for defending yourself & tell you to be thankful that the BlueCoats let you live..
@madrolla shush , high-school used to have indoor ranges. They would allowsrudents to carry on campus for tge purpose of indoor range training circa 1950's
The ATF shouldn’t even exist.
The ATF could serve a good purpose. The problem is Democrats use it to restrict our rights through erroneous rule making. The problem is that the ATF, and other agencies, are allowed to basically make laws through "rulemaking." For any agency (supposed experts who are really just unelected and ideological administrators!) - For their rule to have the effect of law, the given set of rules should be sent back to the legislature for approval. In that way, politicians are accountable for all laws as intended rather than using an agency to circumvent the constitution. And there wouldn't be so much confusion while awaiting cases to work all the way to the Supreme Court. Very few rules would ever be granted the effect of law.
@@KevinBurdine-k4tyou lost me when you said “democrats”. Are we so far behind that we think the “republicans” represent our best interests? These people don’t care about our rights, it’s about control and money. Can you not see the deceitfulness behind all these “republicans” acting like they are against the “democrats” yet still restricting and voting against our rights?
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be a grocery store, not a government agency.
They only exist if you think they do
I think if the founding fathers would've realized the 2nd amendment would've breed simpletons like yall they wouldn't have added it.
It's a shame we have so-called law enforcement who don't respect people's 2nd amendment rights and don't know what an AR pistol is.
Is the blue line desecration of the flag an irony thing?
as you have a terrorist flag as your profile pic. shut up lol
You shouldn’t be walking around residential parks with a “pistol”. You backwoods idiots might get away with that, but here in the suburbs that is extremely out of the ordinary. I don’t blame these cops one bit for responding to the call. The guy that made video is an absolute idiot that needs to get a job and stop testing law enforcement. The only people that hate law enforcement are the ones breaking the laws, or this idiot walking around with PCC.
It's a shame that morons like this are what gun control advocates use as an example of "people who believe in 2nd amendment rights" to show to the average voter when they're pushing dumb gun control legislation. But this kinda thing also makes me understand why they vote for them, I sure as hell don't want this lunatic strolling my neighborhood with his "pistol" to see "who's gonna challenge his rights"
@@AllanPowell something never set right with me about that altered flag. Thank you for giving me a reason to question it further. It is completely wrong and this is how far the majority have slid. Things are being done so much so that it's almost a constant bombardment against what is the law. Wether GOD, man or moral. Question it or quietly accept.
I understand we have rights I do, but I never understood people putting themselves in dangerous situations by open carrying especially with an AR pistol platform. A lot of people don’t understand firearms and will always express caution.
But look how many people in these comments are white.
Sooo.... People shouldn't exercise their rights... because ignorant people don't understand the constitution?!
So 2 cops had to google gun laws?
That's the problem with the police is they don't know the law they are just there to be people down.
@@GTA-qv8pk
They know the law. They don’t care. They are mercenaries serving whichever political overlord pays them, (R) or (D).
There are thousands of laws. Cops didn't go to law school, they went to a 5 month academy with 2 weeks of that being a law block. Needless to say, they don't know all the laws.
@@POPJack1717
We’re not referring to obscure and antiquated laws. We’re referring to the basics. They know those laws and often enforce them falsely and punitively. Would you tolerate your plumber or roofer not knowing their job and make excuses for them as water infiltrates your home? Doubtful. These are people playing a game of life and death with human beings on a daily basis. Be it financially or with bullets, people’s lives are at stake and people like you let them off with an excuse. Wait until it happened to you.
@@tinfoilsombrero1439 like I said, they don't know all of the laws hence why they had to look up what an AR pistol was. My point still stands, they don't know all of the laws and do time to time act while being completely uninformed on said laws. Which is why you have people like the guy in the video who do what they do to 'educate' the police. Hell, not even attorneys know all of the laws and you expect the police to with 2 weeks of law block from the academy??? You can't expect the police to be attorneys and also be apart of the Defund the Police movement. Takes money to keep officers trained and updated on the ever changing laws, procedures, etc. Can't have it both ways.
Don’t you love when the law enforcement experts have to Google the law on their phones.
Yeah it's a shame that they have to look up something they should know. But I'm completely for them doing a google search to tell them they're wrong. It's better than them assuming and taking him into custody. Playing devil's advocate, some of the best doctors are constantly google searching to find answers. There's just so much info out there.
Just shows that the laws are getting so ridiculous and so many are being added and refined so often that they can't even keep up with all that shit anymore ...
Attorneys with college degrees often have to review the law because there are so many, no one individual can truly remember them all. Have the expectation that cops are geniuses while giving them the respect of being stupid. You’re the one who has no logic.
You don't know what you're talking about. They weren't looking up the law. They were looking up the gun to verify that it was indeed classified as a pistol. No matter how well the officers know the law it would be asinine to expect them to know the details of every one of the tens of thousands of different guns out there. The officers got a call about someone carrying a rifle. They had no choice but to respond and check it out. It's interesting to note that the end of this "incident" was not shared. Probably because after determining the guy was within his rights to be carrying the firearm the officers handed the gun back to him and walked away.
@@pinballrick6031 how often does she hit you?
The NFA is blatantly unconditional, how it hasn't been challenged is beyond the scope of my peanut 🥴
As a Missourian in 2021, it makes me happy to know that this action would have resulted in a $50k fine per officer, under our now-in-effect Second Amendment Protection Act. Local and state police can no longer enforce federal firearms law, only state law, of which we have very little. If the feds want to enforce their regulations, they're free to do so, they just can't force the locals to pay for it any more.
based mizzou
Is Tennessee similar with its law? We pretty based here but I’m unsure about the 2nd amendment preservation act?
@@juanvaldez5422 does that mean in Tennessee or Missouri there is no NFA or Hughes amendment? Can you guys make SBR all day?
From Missourian to Missourian 🙏 👏 🙌
We will not bend. Joe can come make a national example of HIMSELF
Does NC have that?
Those pigs should get fried
These geniuses don't realize that if this citizen was a criminal those guys would have never made it up to him alive.
Officer- do you have a Federal tax stamp?
😂😂 its a pistol soooo no...
Dont you only need those for suppresors and fully automatics and a few other things including explosives?
@@ANONisEVERYTHINGno, you need them for sbr's as well. But this was a pistol, as classified by the atf. Therefore, no tax stamp required.
Even if it wasn an sbr though, they dont have the authority to require that he show them the tax stamp. And if he showed them a tax stamp, they dont have the ability to check if its even real. They are just harrassing the guy.
@@NG-VQ37VHRthey can’t check the stamp but they can get an atf agent down there to look at it
It's chambered in 9mm. It literally shoots a pistols caliber. It's a pistol
@@ghostkilla931 that's how my BMF-9 is. It's an AR platform chambered in 9mm .. takes Glock mags
Their demeanor, and every other cop I ever see, is always so, us vs. them.
that's how they're trained, warrior mentality, against civilians
@@AllanPowell
Cops are civilians. They don’t thinks so nor do they desire to be but nonetheless, they are.
Tough to watch...man
@Christian Constitutionalist
I said that to a local cop when his wheels began to come off of his argument. He turned the color of a beet. I thought he was going to stroke out. 🤞🏻
@@AllanPowell Wrong. every officer I know is a strong 2A supporter, and believes the gun laws especially here in MA are nothing short of egregious. They are not trained to have any kind of negative mentality toward civilians. This case represents to me a group of uninformed officers, nothing more. Not all cops are gun nuts, you can't blame them for not knowing what an AR pistol is, but they did handle the situation poorly. That being said, stating that they're trained a certain way to be against civilians is ignorant, and objectively inaccurate.
*The issue is that everyone wanted their personal souvenir letter from the ATF to justify their brace.*
Pistol braces were hardly on the ATF's radar until people started doing silly stuff like this. Then it's banned, unbanned, re-banned, reunbanned.... etc....
That cop wants to work for the AFT so bad " do you have a tax stamp?"
Yeah, that threw me.
That was the only thing he knew about guns 😂
He’s looking it up on his rose gold iPhone 😂
That color is 🔥🔥🔥
Ok?
Rose gold (on the iPhone 12 at least) is a harder more scratch resistant coating
🤣😂
Hahaha, I noticed that too. I actually think my wife has the same exact one, haha.
The problem is that these audits are going to cost us far more rights than they gain.
You’re already losing your rights with that defeatist mindset
@@Hypnotically_Caucasian Hard disagree. Most people who are in the middle don’t see this and have the “oh look a man with a gun that didn’t do anything wrong, I guess guns are fine.”
They see this and say “insane that it’s legal, it shouldn’t be.”
It harms us.
That's actually really disturbing that police officers don't know the law. I don't expect them to be able to quote penal codes but they should know whether someone is breaking the law or not without having to make contact. Just like watching someone drive by that has legal tags and is doing the speed limit.
Most cops just hate for civilians to have guns for some reason... Hell, even knives. I've had cops on campus follow me around because I had a folding knife on my pocket. Lol.
Local LEO don't study federal laws.
The most disturbing part wasn’t that he was open carrying a AR around a bunch of kids and ppl in a park??? Regardless of his intent that is irrational especially considering the amount of mass shooting taking place on the daily in this country.
They are not lawyers so it’s to be expected they have limited knowledge. I hear there are opening go become one show them how it’s done.
@@thaistomp Its not about the gun. Its about the person knowingly breaking the law to have said gun.
That one cop was eyeballing it like “man I wish I had one too…” 😂
Fr
Dum dum fiddled the trigger twice too.
Ok well I see the cops aren’t the best but this guy ain’t right either why would you go walking around with a rifle looking gun or even something like this at all next to kids playing sports.
To be fair, braces look a lot like stocks, and are practically used as stocks by many people. What we really need is to remove SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs from the NFA.
Or abolish the NFA.
true, these guys know what they are doing. if it was something they were harassing him over that was more obvious then that’s definitely an issue, but a guy walking in the park with something that looks identical to whatever is the law where he is is kind of bullshit and childish. unless he is trying to see if they take it from him illegally after making contact but doing this in the first place just to try and make a scene knowing how complicated this specific set up is shows what type of guy he is. not even the top government decision makers know wtf their doing and what law changes each day so how can you expect these guys who have way better shit to do and actually deal with real armed criminals that probably started out as a call just like this to know what the new rule is today. when they go home at night they don’t just beat their dick to gun laws EVERY night just so they can answer each one of your audits perfectly. they know generally what is and isn’t legal, when it gets down to specifics you should be auditing the ATF. but we both know you’ll have your ass handed to you by fine print laws that even you don’t know. so you stick to wasting everyone’s time for content like this. fucking nerd.
Yeah, with all the back and forth legal stuff lately, it's not surprising that they weren't exactly sure what the current legal status is lol
Abolish the NFA entirely for being unconstitutional
I don’t see anything wrong with short barreled weapons honestly, as long as it’s tax stamped, and not in the hands of an idiot. Distance is calibrated by rifling, and mobility is calibrated by stock or brace. I don’t even know why I’m typing this anymore i forgot the atf banned braces- I forgot where I was going with this honestly. This comments over a year old, my apologies
This is embarrassing for this department. As far back as 2010, all of my friends who were cops not only had AR pistols themselves, but were familiar with the actual laws in regards to firearms and what constituted what. These guys are acting like they're hearing this stuff for the first time in their life.
They look like kids
Most officers are not familiar with the laws they enforce. They all seem to have "masters degrees" from online universities yet they cannot understand the simplest of concepts. To be fair, a small number of officers are quite sharp but the vast majority are a dissapointment. Why? Study the recruitment process, the kinds of personalities that gravitate toward the profession, and very important, how people are promoted within the profession.
@@ekimnamdets6946ecause they hire kids right out of high school man. It’s all about who you know. These kids don’t have real life experience, yet they’re supposed to make adult decisions in real world scenarios. I’m a paramedic, and I can’t tell you how many times we’ve called law enforcement for them to show up and just walk around with their hands in their vest and not take charge on scenes. I literally chuckle when I see some of them show up and how young and innocent they look.
Ive had to take charge on a lot of calls to de escalate tensions with people, even though law enforcement was there for that reason, but they stand around with their thumbs up their ass just looking clueless. It’s the reason I carry on my job, even though I’m not supposed to because little 20 year old Joey right out of high school doesn’t know how to be a man and do his job when Ems or fire request him.
Cops are never your friend....
These guys aren’t police officers. They’re there for the paycheck and power trip only.
Shameful. As an LEO I am absolutely embarrassed at their utter ignorance and questioning of your right to exercise your freedoms guaranteed to by the Bill of Rights. Absolutely shameful. Unfortunately there are many anti-constitutional LEOs out there. You did a great job of remaining calm and respectful despite their unprofessional behavior.
@2:14 THE WORST PART OF THE VID: when multiple police pull out there cell phones to look up info, likely on google or wikipedia, because they know nothing about what's in front of them... when you see 6 LAW ENFORCEMENT officers that don't know more than a random citizen, it shows you why law enforcement is just a big of a problem for citizens as criminals are for citizens
omg that was too funny. oh geez better get on google and figure this out.
It'd been faster if they called local police
Very well said.
@@PeteRoe Its more terrifying and disturbing that they did that than funny. AR pistols have been around for a long time and people have been building them for awhile. The fact that several LEOs don't know what it is scares me. They all carry an AR in their car and practice with them.. they should know who CMMG is as well. Unfortunately we have to use this "brace" and classify it as a pistol because of stupid laws that should have never been fabricated in the first place. If law abiding citizens lost their right to own guns like this it would open the door up to many bad things. Just remember that criminal that now knows you have no protection will have a full automatic m4...
Cops do that a LOT when trying to come up with charges. The job has an IQ cap that hovers around average. Any drift from that goes to below-average. Someone who deserves applause for grasping basic algebra is then a few weeks of training in how to apply the law in the real world with real people.
So let me get this straight, they are upset with effectively making a pistol longer? So legal pistol that's easily concealable is ok, but somehow becomes more dangerous by adding bulk? Yeah ok, keep pretending like any of this is for public safety. If it was then they already would have used statistics of crimes to ban them. Instead they issue "Guidelines" with no actual guidance, using subjective terms maybe & might. Nothing says public safety like not explaining how to comply.
it's the manufacturers lying to consumers about legality of their products that's the problem in their eyes. Pistols can be longer but shouldn't be shouldered like a rifle. They can't ban them because of the ADA so don't worry about that. If they caught you with a home build they'd more likely tell you to make it compliant or register it than charge you unless you were already getting charged with some sort of violent crime.
I don't entirely disagree, but the way they wrote the guidelines, it's subjective & up to chance as to if your complying over arbitrary thoughts. My main point was they vilified SBRs due to concealability, but concealable pistols are totally fine? Unless ofcourse you add a horseshoe pc of plastic to the rear? Also was noting they aren't plastering statistics because they don't support their argument. I dont think they should punish companies for skirting the line, its not illegal, many conversations were documented, & lets be honest the gov skirts the line 24/7. Best wishes & stay safe.
@@pmanameless8184 All of those are valid points. The NFA is unconstitutional as a whole but as long as mass compliance exists so do their regulations and power. They're really just cracking down on manufacturers from false advertising stuff as ATF approved and trying to keep them from selling pistol brace equipped firearms as approved that wouldn't be. For the individual gun owners that bought them in good faith they wouldn't be able to jump to prosecution they would just say "make it compliant, send pictures so we can close this and move on" if they didn't just flat out waive the tax if you chose to register and throw a real stock on it.
@@AllanPowell Agreed. I guess my problem is the trust part, the Kelland Wright case & also a few videos on YT of CA Leo's getting warrants to search homes of AW applicants are very concerning(plenty more). In CA they made citizens register legally owned weapons for new laws, & then tried to/did bust them for said weapon during review process they made them apply for. In my mind ATF does the same stuff, in the Wright case they tried enforcing very specific regulations that were never shared, even worse is it actually did abide by the unknown reg & they tried to measure diagonally against their own rules to make it stick. Its disgusting to me, & here it seems they have no justified reason to pursue this further, but they will. Compliancy is a killer. Thank you for having a civil conversation, way too much arguing these days. Have a good night.
Didn’t you know bullets out of a firearm all become “more deadlier” (scientific term) the more points of contact the weapon has with the body ?! That’s why AOW are regulated with “foregrips”..,Makes 9mm able to blow through 10 buildings and we won’t even talk about a short shotgun with a grip!! Heavens know !!!🥴😒🙄
I’m sorry, but this is just dumb. Just because you have the right to do something doesn’t mean you should. Save the big guns for when they are appropriate and conceal a pistol like the rest of us.
Dude exactly. I Carry concealed every day. I'm not walking around with an ar pistol just to cause trouble. This just makes the rest of us look bad. I really hate these "audits" guys. They literally have nothing else going on in their lives.
@@jonathanbrightwell272 It’s like the people who say the most obnoxious shit and then claim their First Amendment right to say it. Lol. Just because you have the right to say whatever you please doesn’t mean that speech is consequence-free. In today’s world, this dude is lucky he didn’t get blasted.
I'm glad I'm not the only one completely baffled by this senseless audit. If the blasting did indeed start there were kids there that could've gotten crossfire. This wasn't thought through, pointless, stupid, and selfish.
Dumb for you maybe. The balance of power should be maintained.
@@nileshsharma9220 Do you support the 2A because it broadly minimizes the use of violence as a means of resolving conflict, or are you out for blood and using 2A preservation as a justification for getting it? I ask because those are two vastly different motivations. These audits are merely provocations and publicity stunts, which is why they are always done with specific firearms (AR Platform), and are always posted on social media. The inherent risks that come with doing these audits far outweigh any potential benefits. There are clearly better ways to advocate for our rights, ways that don’t involve a potential shootout….unless that’s what you’re looking for….
“Thank you for causing a panic!”.... No one was panicking accept the officer initially addressing this legally armed citizen. “Do you have a federal tax stamp?”... Well, The citizen should not have had to explain this to the officer... In essence, they will not be happy until we are all compliant servants not free citizens.
Soccer moms called in a man with a rifle. Officers don't know AR pistols because they're exempt from NFA
1984
The answer to that is" Are you a ATF agent, only an ATF agent can ask me if I have a tax stamp. You not being an ATF agent cannot touch this if I do have a tax stamp."
@@AllanPowell officers are not exempt from the NFA, Authorized departments can file a form with the ATF and be cleared for Machine guns and SBRs, and then issue them to the officer.
But personal weapons, weapons used not in an official capacity, and retired/former officers are all subject to the NFA.
It is important for officers to realize this as well, the majority are civilians when not on duty, all the more important to protect and defend the constitution and not your boss, colleague if they are opposed to it.
@@knottywoodoutdoors4932 Yet officers, in many times out of department requirements, carry these NFA exempt weapons when off duty, in their vehicles or wherever.... Almost making them personally exempt by proxy.
If any of these cops were “gun guys” they would know the weapon classification by its specs.
If I was a cop on duty during this incident I would’ve cleared the weapon and ran the serial number in the database. Make sure it’s not stolen and manufactured as a pistol lower receiver. If it’s not manufactured as a pistol than it’s illegal. There’s a difference between a lower manufactured as a rifle and pistol. A pistol lower can be turned into a sbr legally, but a rifle lower cannot be made into a pistol. A rifle lower can only be turned into an sbr.
thats where you are wrong, there is a reason AR lowers nowadays are marked "multi cal", they are just lowers, it is up to the builder/owner to follow unconstitutional regs
Oh they know, it’s just they don’t want people to have what they can have.
@@Hadouken5150 should of know when he said cmmg and 9mm. you just gotta know I guess
@@maxtheroofer8004 True, but… caliber doesn’t matter when it’s manufactured. You could buy a Colt 6920 cambered in 5.56 and slap a 300 blackout barrel on it and it wouldn’t change the classification. It’s still a rifle. Even though that pistol in the video is cambered in 9mm you’d still have to run the serial number to make sure it is in fact a pistol. It could be an illegal SBR with a brace. ALWAYS run serial numbers. Caliber doesn’t matter.
Idk why it Bugs me when people call themselves auditors . Weather it’s the ones who just go and record buildings to make people uncomfortable and call the police or the ones who legally open carry AR style pistols . Like I vote republican I have guns im about free speech but just the smugness of calling yourself an auditor when your a civilian with a camera and a RUclips channel anyone can do it. a real auditor has credentials and gets hired by a company or the government.
You carry a gun for a living but none of them know wtf a brace is
Absolutely hilarious that not even ONE of the LEO'S CLEARED the weapon!!! Did they not know how???
First thing I thought, and I bet they don't. The one cop is holding it like he's almost scared of it.
So he had a pistol, potentially strapped to his arm, at a park where kids were playing. Is it reasonable to expect the reasonable person to conclude that an individual with a weapon of that nature is merely exercising their second amendment rights? If that is the precedent, then what stops any individual with malicious intent from leveraging that precedent to situate their selves in a public space, unharassed, to carry out malicious intent? More guns? Does every law abiding citizen need to bring a similar weapon with them to a baseball field? I am a firm second amendment supporter, but the premise of auditing the police on the second amendment in a place where children are playing is selfish and asinine. Be a decent human being and run your audit in a place less conspicuous preferably with no children next time. All this scenario would've needed to potentially cause a lot of harm is another lawfully bearing citizen spooked into shooting first and asking questions later.
i thought the exact same thing. this is what makes all owners, carriers and supporters of the 2nd amendment look bad.
Good on you brother, can’t believe how ignorant these “LEO professionals” are of the laws they’re enforcing
they are only hired if they score under a certain level in their aptitude tests. There was a court battle over this and the prospective officer was denied a job due to scoring too highly.
The courts upheld this and he was prevented from being a cop for being too smart.
this is the country we live in, it is by design. They don't want them thinking for themselves
Im way more scared of five police officers than one guy walking quietly through the park.
I see a guy walking through a public park carrying that, I am gonna assume they are an active shooter threat and shoot them before they can get a chance. I'm all for gun rights but idiots that go out attention seeking like this cause mass panic for people walking in the park. Normal people in this day and age are gonna believe the individual is there to cause harm.
@@bstreet2391 you can't shoot until you confirm a threat. That would make you a murderer and the idiot in that situation.
@@bstreet2391dumb statement, if the guys walking through the park and you hear zero gun fire, you’re saying you’d shoot him just because he’s holding a gun? And you’re assuming he’s the crazy person?
@@bstreet2391you’re a complete fool and I wish I could call you more than that on this comment section tough guy
@@bstreet2391He wasn’t carrying it, that’s an important distinction. He had it slung across his back, I probably would at least draw on someone with any gun IN THEIR HANDS, but holstered or slung I’ll probably just start talking with them about their gun.
To be fair, the ATF puts out stupid regulations and classifications all the time. Even as a gun owner it's hard to keep up with their bullcrap. In all practicality, that's a rifle. It's just the ATF's stupidity that labels it a "pistol."
Even so, by the videoer's own admission he was just doing it to "educate" the police by causing public panic. I'm all for the second amendment but using it to intentionally cause a scene only makes people hate guns more. You'll never change the stigma about guns by using them to incite panic. Be a responsible gun owner.
As far as the cops go, if someone is reportedly walking around with a gun around kids, they need to be cautious and make sure everything is okay. I'd prefer cops like these being vigilant and ensuring everything is legal rather than the uvalde cops. Yes, they should study up on gun laws, but they're not ATF officers, so they're not going to know every gun law on the spot because they usually don't deal with classifying guns or taking them unless they're involved in a crime. I know many people want reasons to hate cops but take a moment to put yourself in their shoes. If you got a call that someone was in the park with your child carrying a gun and walking around suspiciously, would you not care? Would you say "well I'm sure he's just exercising his second amendment rights" or would you make sure everything is safe and this person isn't a threat first then say it's their right? Too often we like to place blame on cops who are just people with a job that is intense and dangerous, yet we act like they're the ones that made the laws they're sworn to uphold. In this case they looked up the laws and everything was fine. They didn't shoot the guy or beat him or do anything out of line.
And lastly, the ATF is an unconstitutional organization that's against the second amendment and they should be dissolved. Their regulations and classifications are made by people who have no firearm knowledge or experience whatsoever.
Very well said, this is the type of un-biased approach more people should adapt before getting all "Merika" in the comments section.
if joe public sees guns every day they are not going to panic. when I was a kid EVERY pickup had a gunrack in the back window often filled with a deer rifle and a shotgun for ducks. no one blinked an eye. now that you hid your guns joe public loses his shit when he sees one. hiding it created the issue.
It’s sad there are so many officers who are ignorant of such things. The ATF wants to flub that all up.
Definitely more training is needed and shame on the police department for lack of knowledge/training!
Muzzled his fellow officer
Remember back in the old days where open carry was a norm?
@DanOfTheWild you mean like combat vets like Pat Mac, Warrior Poet, and Tu Lam just to name a few. Yeah those cowards? Those guys did more for this country and our rights than your fat ass could even dream of!
@DanOfTheWild Well it’s true, too many videos of open carriers getting taken out first or just having their gun taken away for not being aware of their surroundings, conceal carry is definitely a better option for getting the drop on someone.
Maybe in small town USA. It was never like that in the city or suburbs.
@@Hadouken5150 In the suburbs it was definitely normal
@@CASTRO45ACP definitely wasn't in the suburbs where I grew up in.
2:12
Look at the way Mr. Where's-Your-Tax-Stamp points the barrel of the uncleared pistol at his buddy, LMAOOOO bro should be FIRED.
I am amazed at the amount of Leo's that don't know guns and gun laws. Not that I like to hear people boast on forever and give me the history over each and every gun they ever owned or shot but I also don't like to see unbelievable ignorance over something that should be common knowledge among them, second nature..
imagine needing a "permit" to literally buy back your rights? Wild
At that point it's not a right but a revocable privilege, an obvious violation.
@@KiraSlith exactly
uninformed law enforcement is scary man
the executive branch of the government is what's negatively mind-blowing to me
Legal open carry in my state, South Carolina! Love it! As it should be. Second amendment is our right!!!
Just because someone panics, doesn’t mean he broke the law. Geezus. And people say we don’t need guns because there’s cops…
Imagine not being able to open carry a rifle and having to have a permit to carry a pistol
"Legally armed citizen might get nervous, an officer approaches with his weapon drawn..."
I don't get it. Even if it had a stock on it, instead of a brace, they STILL don't have the authority to take it from him without an ATF agent on scene...
Cops don’t have to be accountable anymore. Our forefathers are rolling in their graves
They didn't take it. They were examining it. Not everything has to be a fight. They showed respect and restraint and just because the law makers give them shit training, doesn't make it their fault.
@@no_handle_required They did illegally disarm this guy. He broke no laws, and was minding his own business. He didn't fight. They treated him disrespectfully with the ignorance of law, their attitude and snide remarks. Bringing up "the children" and tax stamp. And they are the enforcers of the law, they need to get at least as much training as a non leo citizen, on their own if need be. As one other poster said, ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Wow the first cop on sight pointed his gun at him with his finger on the trigger and terrifyingly he kept his finger on the trigger when he was holding the gun one handed.
These clowns are all Barney Fifes. Their uniforms look like Halloween costumes. Goes to prove the argument that many civilians train more and exhibit better firearm safety habits than LEOs.
@@fleatactical7390 sad but true
Idiots
Guys ares are so skinny 😂 How is he an officer!
@@weasel101 Obviously a rookie who hasn't hit the hollow carb (aka donuts) threshold yet.
we dont have to know the law, we ARE the law! #defundtheAFT
This is one of those, just because I can do it doesn't mean it's a good plan to do it. I'll open carry all day long in the back country or in my own house but out in the public it's just way less headache to carry concealed. This is a solution looking for a problem, as near as I can tell.
Exactly. Thats what i say with all these amendment auditors. All they are doing is looking to stir up trouble on purpose. To catch cops not knowing things. Who cares! There is no scenario anyways where you need to carry this pistol in public. Conceal a regular sized small one instead.
Yea but big gov need to be checked
It's an American exercising his 2A right.
I think gun owners have an unwritten obligation to be responsible in their actions, and to show good judgement.
Showing up to a public park where kids play with an AR pistol, with the intent to elicit a response from concerned parents and law enforcement just to prove a legal point, demonstrates a clear lack of responsibility and common sense.
Frankly I wouldn’t trust this man with a firearm.
No the worse part is five cops and nobody cleared the freaking weapon. 🤦♂️
And the one holding muzzle flashed the other cops leg
R u watching the same video i am?
I’ve never had a cop clear my weapon.
Dude caused all this cause he doesn't have a job
Back the blue? Remember these will be the people that will do the government's bidding.
Not true
To be fair given the amount of mass shootings over there they have every right to be a bit skeptical and worried. Why is he walking around with a rifle AKA pistol carbine with children all over the place you're asking for trouble.
The fact that the first officer has his rifle at the low ready, eyeing you up and kind of pointing it at you would definitely feel like threat more then anything.
Well, when you have a guy randomly walking around in a park with a gun that appears like that, what do you think they're suppose to do at first glance? BTW, I'm far from a bootlicker. It's kinda like the kid walking around on the roof at a presidential rally with a rifle in Pennsylvania. At this point, the cops are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Not a fan of how either party conducted themselves.. the first officer made some pretty snide remarks and was very "us vs them". That said they're just doing there duty I mean it's weird for a citizen to patrol a park with a braced pistol. As a father of 3 kids and a total 2a supporter/gun fanatic I'd be quite cautious if I saw someone walking around with that pistol at a park... idk. Is what it is.
Well said. You come off as very well read. This guys heart is in the right place but his mind was on vacation.
Agreed, it’s a potential nightmare for everyone. I get the message but don’t shoot the messenger seems especially appropriate on this one.
"do you have a federal tax stamp?" "Did you swear an oath to uphold the constitution?"
Remember. Idiots want these guys to have all the rights. Can't even practice basic firearm safety. Tsk tsk tsk
It's a DAMN SHAME that in this Country it takes longer to become a HAIR STYLIST than it does to become a cop.
Yep 12 months in my town to become a street rest officer and we have a fuck ton of morons with badges who barely can spell yet alone know laws.. we also have an awkward amount of police involved shootings of unarmed people..
What is he trying to prove here exactly, that he can scare people? I'm not saying he shouldn't be able to do this or that it should be illegal for anyone to do it. I'm saying only a tool of epic proportions would WANT to do something like this. This Makes the whole community look bad.
I believe he is trying to expose people to the reality of our rights. He's just going about it in a bad way.
EXACTLY! When the pistol brace issue first came around and ATH=F issued their memo/"ruling" about them being legal, gun owners should have just said cool, and gone about their business enjoying the win. But then people like this push the issue drawing unneeded attention. Then ATF issues a memo saying the inadvertently shouldering a brace is okay. Again, gun owners should have just said "cool" and gon about their business. BUT, every swinging dick with a brace jumps on youtube posting videos of them intentionally shouldering the braces and thumbing their noses at "the man". WTF did they think would happen?
Now look at the situation, it is a direct result and the fault of those who like to "poke the bear" for no good reason.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in fighting the good fight, but it pays to pick your battles and to not start a fight when it is not needed and serves no real purpose.
ALSO, even if it were just standard pistol (Glock, Sig, etc) walking around with it in your hand or displayed in the open other than carried legally in a holster (per whatever state's laws), in a park where families and kids are present could be a cause for alarm.
@@mddrudgeif people don’t’poke the bear”, then the Issues of Infringements never gets brought up in court, and never gets settled on.
And for the recourd, the ATF is NOT the bear being poked;, the American People are the Bear, and the ATF Rats are gnawing at our paws while we pretend to sleep…
Stop pretending to sleep, and wake up with the rest of us.
@@mddrudge no, you don't believe in "fighting the good fight." You seem more like the "yes, daddy," beta type.
If the man is carrying within the law, let him carry and leave him alone. Who are you to dictate how others should carry? Someone that exercises a right in a way YOU don't like shouldn't be denigrated. You don't have to carry in the same manner he does just like he isn't relegated to whatever form of carry you, and every other judgmental gun snob like you, choose.
Also, stop with the asinine and emotional platitudes, what ifs, and whataboutisms. You sound like the mad mommies. "What about the children! Think of the children!" What about them? They should be exposed to and educated about firearms at a young age. They should also be taught that we have the right to carry and if they encounter someone carrying, they're just exercising their rights.
If it's holstered/slung, go on about your day. Stop immediately thinking the worst. That very person could end up saving the lives of those children. Rights don't end where your feelings begin. If you come at me with something as ridiculous as "the children," I'm going to respond with the words of the late, great, George Carlin: "Fu*k the children."
The guy in the video is a good friend of mine named Tim Harper. He's done more to advance gun rights in the state of Oklahoma than many others could ever hope to do. This incident happened at Hafer Park in Edmond, Oklahoma. The agency in the video is the Edmond PD.
you understand what that Looks like? hey cop, you Understand what LAWS are!!??? don't care about your FEELINGS!
exactly
Law enforcement that has NO clue what is legal or what the law is. I'd be fired from my job if I was this incompetent.
I get it but at the same time auditors annoy the shit outta me
Why would it annoy you? Are you law enforcement that have to deal with these auditor.?
It never ceases to amaze me how many LEO's don't know gun laws that are new and are all over media, social and otherwise.
2 years later, and you got your answer. Not that we the people needed one to begin with. It's all infringements.
I fully understand what your doing… On the other hand this really is uncalled for to be in public doing shit like this. Basically putting it in the public eye for no reason.
Wasn’t me. This is an educational video saying exactly what you are
The entire point is to demonstrate the tyranny that has taken hold in this once free country.
"The police are there to help you."
The "help" in question:
The description of this video has aged marvelously given current events 😂
I can't stress this enough. I am pro LEO, BUT so many cops .
1. Don't know what they don't know .
2. Will enforce only what they think they know.
3. Will follow orders .
Not one of these cops new what this firearm was ... Not one
Pretty pathetic. And they are the ones that get to enforce laws they don’t understand and bust your ass strait to jail, with your tax dollars.
Its unfortunate that law enforcement do not even know the laws they are enforcing
LOL! You know you have a issues when the cop pulls out pink IPhone to google what an AR pistol is.
just a reminder that the only truly constitutional law enforcement agency of this republic is your local sheriff department. 🇺🇸
Children have been killed playing with pellet guns by cops. This also scares people with kids bc looks like u bout to do a mass shooting. It’s rude, and unethical and unnecessary. I own guns.
The more you do these "audits" the more people are turned against the 2nd amendment and the more regulations are placed on firearms.
Exactly! We live in a time where too many mentally ill people are running around. Moms and families see a "man with a gun" not a "guy doing an audit". Being from inner-City Philly, people would assume bad stuff first. These "audits" are not helpful at all.
The cops are asking if he has a tax stamp after he just clarified that it’s a pistol, kills me
As a native European, I see this as a protest against the disarmament of responsible, law-abiding gun owners, highlighting the importance of safeguarding individual freedoms. I have great respect for the founders of your nation, who intended for it to be a place of true personal liberty. The situation in the UK serves as a cautionary example of how restrictive policies can deteriorate into an unfavorable state of affairs. While i truly empathize with the victims of gun violence and understand their perspectives, I believe the root issue isn't guns themselves. The real problem lies in the widespread neglect of the mental health crisis affecting the Western world. It's not the guns that kill, it's people. Even if firearms are taken away, individuals struggling with severe mental health issues will still find other means to commit harmful and dark deeds. Addressing the underlying mental health challenges is the key to preventing such tragedies. God bless America, and God bless Europe. God bless us all.
Cop holding it is like dam I want one of those
HAHA!! (Best comment)
i mean , yes the 2nd amendment . but why walk around the park with a pcc ? the amount of concerns will peak . it was the same with that black dude fully geared up in black with a mask and a glock on the front on his vest . and with the amount of active mass shooters in usa i mean come on guys . common sense is that hard to unlock ?
The amount of active shooters with ties to the government*
I understand that it's a matter of definition, and I see your point of view, but come on. Would you not feel any type of discomfort seeing a dude walking around with what appears to be a rifle, openly, in a public park where kids often are? Has there not been enough shootings in America to put even the slightest concern in your minds when seeing someone armed to the teeth calling a cow a chicken just because a gray zone in the law defines it as such?
You have a right to do something But the police also have a obligation to investigate suspicious stuff. And if you wander around the park wiith an ar pistol out in the open its slightly abnormal. Just because you have the right to do something. Doesn't mean people won't be concerned and call the police. And don't be surprised when called sometimes the police show up. Also no surprise sometimes they don't really know the law. That's why they're not judges thank God.
The fact that the cop said “well we got a call about a rifle… that’s obviously not an open carry ability.”
since when?
@@42701texasman that’s what I’m saying lol
LOL! I openly carry my deer hunting rifle on logging roads and in the woods all the time! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What else am i going to do? Shove it down my pants!?!? 🤣
Always since the second amendment was written have American citizens been able too legally carry weapons! Pistols, rifles etc doesn’t matter. That’s your right to do so without persecution from the government!
I looked around the room like…huh? Is this a state vs state thing that maybe I’m not aware of? 🤣
Cops are people, not always gun experts, but they should be briefed on this stuff more.
Also foolish to create an uprising for no purpose other than just to test the response. This is why some people view gun enthusiasts negatively.
I understand the purpose, but it’s creating a stir unnecessarily
You forgot to tell them that you charge 5,000$ a minute for law education.