INSTANT CLASSIC! LEGENDS OF POKER COLLIDE IN A HAND FOR THE AGES ♠ Live at the Bike!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- If you LOVE Live at the Bike! and want access to exclusive content and emojis, become a RUclips member! Support us here: / @ballylivepoker
Visit our site www.liveatthebi.... For a free week, use promo code: poker
STREAMING LIVE ♠ MONDAY - FRIDAY ♠ 6pm PT / 9pm ET
/ liveatthebike
CLICK SUBSCRIBE then click the bell icon to get notifications when we go live and post highlights.
In this video:
$$50/$50/$100 +$100 Big Blind Ante No Limit Hold'em - August 23, 2019
Commentator: JJ De La Garza
Follow us on all of our social media to receive updates!
Twitter: / liveatthebike
Instagram: / liveatthebike
Facebook: / liveatthebike
Watch. Play. Win! Download this video and hundreds more at www.liveatthebi...
Live at the Bike! is the first and only regularly scheduled weekly webshow to feature a live poker cash game. Real people, playing real poker... uncut, unscripted, unedited, with expert commentary from top grossing poker pros who make their living playing the same games we feature on their own bankrolls.
![[UNCENSORED] Phil Hellmuth STORMS OFF THE SET Losing $286,000 Pot](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KmsXQk6Pj74/mqdefault.jpg)
The funniest part is that Phil is just as tilted after the hand knowing he’s half of mikes action 😂
likely more tilted than mike was haha mike probably had 10k of his own money in front of him lol
So THATS why hes so mad i had no idea lol
Thats why he's my GOAT 🐐🐐🐐
I dont understand how is that allowed to stake a player while you are playing, thats crazy
@@mrcv1999 yeah that doesn’t seem right in the same game. Screams for collusion
Phil and Mike definitely got some 2am Carl’s Jr after this session
Underrated comment!
I love how garrett just keeps stacking his chips imperiously while not acknowledging any of the table talk after the hand lol. Made Mike look like a rec player whos trying to make his session a success making a huge call while having such thin value headed to the river.
The table talk was all nonsense too.
Also the best hand to have against aces is a low suited connected like 56, 67, or 78
That's one quality of a great poker player. Your poker game is not quite at the high stake level if you haven't master that quality. Even Mikey has been a pro for many years and playing big cash games you can visually see his negative/weak body reaction...loss of breath.
@Arkadi Danielyan I literally mentioned 78 idiot
@Arkadi Danielyan the only reason I didn't mention 89. Is because on a 10JQ board, yes you have a straight but if youre playing post flop and it may be likely he has AK as well.
Mike played that hand as fishy and 2004-ish as it gets.
@JohnnyAppleseed You can bet flop or if you check flop then continue to check/call. Bad move raising the turn, just call and then make a decision on river. If Garrett is bluffing then you want him to continue to bluff.
doesn't matter, when G decided to play suited 7 high specially with raise,
the game was over unless Mike put g all in.
Mike's 4 bet was Too easy for G to call.
This is The cash game.
He overated his aces for sure.
Made me cringe
@@richteisnert6827 No, he wants those hands in even though they are the best for cracking A’s. He just overvalued his hand post flop, especially on the turn. That was an easy fold on the turn
The ego of these old pros is their downfall.
wtf did he think he had when he went all in ? HE IS BLUFFING LOL
Long Richard To be fair, he only had 12k left when Garrett went all in.
@@shadowsmessage you must be stupid :)).... garret has played 500k pots before... just that one pots alone = 1/4 of their winning tournaments.
@@shadowsmessage lol just keep on dreaming. But hey, I've got a good news for you!
You got more money than Mike!
The fundamentals and their knowledge of the game is why they're still around. Have some respect
Not in this clip but seconds later on somebody comments to Nick that Garrett is 'lucky;. Nick says:' I know, I've been watching it for ten years now!' Best Comment of them All!
I like the way Garrett just looks down, stacks his new chips and doesn't say a word
Phil lives in a world where you're suppose to play poker by the book.
Nothing needs to be said. The chips being shipped his way does all the talking for him.
Never apologize for winning a pot.
Man, this whole episode reminded me of the glory days of HSP. LATB is the undisputed champ of televised high stakes cashgames, with just a few new faces thrown in. Keep up the good work Ryan, Patrick, JJ, Wayne, Bart, and everyone else involved!
For sure. LATB is a Poker institution. In the sense that it’s a legend, and also in the sense that people often play like they’ve just escaped from a mental institution. 😆
Just talking and having a laugh is important for us viewers.
This aged well lol
Phil helmuth still doesnt understand deep cash games. So funny. Atrocious turn raise from matusow.
Atrocious
Atrocious
Yep, if he just calls and the third spade comes on the river that also completes the straight he probably can get away from it with 22K still behind.
Is he actually profitable in cash games? Like someone who's worth as much as he is should not be buying in for 5,000$ with like 300,000$ on the table
Not sure what he was thinking with that raise. Anyone have an idea?
I love when he says Phil what do u think I had… and Phil goes AA without hesitation 😂😂😂
I love when Phil starts talking about how he can't believe Garret called a four bet with that crap!
That’s pretty much standard Phil.
But it’s a good hand to call with to see if you can hit the flop hard because Mike’s hand is so face up and you can just fold if u don’t hit.
HE CALLED WITH A 76, HONEY!
That’s why Garett buy in for the max chip while the superstar mike and Phil buy in 10K-30K to start. U can call 4G with 67 and kill the flop.
@@donaldpaluga Honey! He called with a 7,6! I'm phucking Fil Hellmoose!
its so funny it was like practically getting to play double exposure blackjack his hand was so face up. very little risk tbh phil is to old school for his own good
Great editing to put Phil saying he has half of Mike's action at the start. It makes Phil's tilting at the end make more sense. Not shown is Phil tilting away like 15k to Mike in the next couple of hands.
Where have you seen that? Mind sharing a link?
@@hanspetervollhorst1 I was watching live when it happened.
i know i cant find rest of that video
Tilting equals giving away chips to your staked player. Not so ethical after all.
@@charlesrobbins2208 Actually that's kinda what it looked like. They were kinda real hands, but definitely not "Phil" style call offs.
Phil sees mastery of deep cash right before his eyes and fails utterly to recognise or appreciate it.
Phil Hellmuth, Mike “The Mouth” Matusow, and Dan “Jungleman” Cates are back this Friday, August 30th. Tune in right here on our channel at 6pm PT/9pm ET for another epic stream!
Please SMASH the Subscribe button if you haven’t already, and click the bell icon to get notifications when we go live and post highlights.
To watch a replay of this entire stream, as well as all of our previous episodes (1500+), visit our website.
www.liveatthebike.com
For 1 free week use promo code: poker
Thanks to everyone who supports this channel and watches our videos. See you Friday!
Where can I watch the Aug 25 broadcast?
Why did you guys private the VOD? We want to see the whole thing! I started watching it and rewound it to the beginning because I was at work during the beginning, then an hour through it the video cut and said "video unavailable" cuz you guys privated the VOD. Please make it public, Hellmuth and The Mouth are two of my favorites!
Declaring who has pieces and which people might be horses for the same staker is the ethical thing to do. I think this should be a rule in tournament poker as well.
What a brat that guy is for doing such a thing
What’s that mean pieces and horses??
Yeah but when you have a piece of someone, you don’t wine about the hand they lost for an hr like Phil did. Am so, horse or a piece is when you have some of their action/ give them money to play with and get a % if the win
@@nof6015 If that's a serious question...
PIECES - Percentage of the player's wins, losses or both.
HORSES - Players who are staked.
@@nof6015 he explained but stated differently, a staker finances players. Since the players are in the game, they are the actual horses in the race. The players have individual agreements as to how the money is paid back to the staker and if there is profit, how that is shared.
Why does this matter? If 2 or 3 players on the table are staked by the same person, they might not play against each other and only go after 'your' chips.
The truth is both Matusow and Hellmuth are considered the fish in this game. It's good Phil mentioned he had a piece of Matusow so we knew how he could afford to play.
I agree especially Mike i think. Helmuth is an amazing tournament player though. He's just so easy to read though at the table. He gives off so many tells.
@@aaronsoto629 Yea i can see those tells too, but i think only us can see it, so plese dont tell others, just keep it for us if u know what i mean!
@@gy_r6g66f6igires this made me laugh so hard, that I had to comment!
@M K 😂😂😂😂 No, no. He did the right thing, he actually didn't comment a SINGLE tell as well. You know, just stated he knows what they are...........
On a side note, that is one of my favorite Polk videos. I actually didn't know he and Charlie had beef at one point.
That was maybe the best video from LATB I’ve seen. All that stuff pre game, awesome. Commentary was on point. Great format. Keep them coming like this. Awesome stuff.
“why is Garrett’s name bigger than mine on the poster” -Cantu while also not able to pay his way into the game himself..
Because Garrett is the man. And you’re just a man.
Cantu is a bad joke
Did Cantu actually say that? lmao
Didn't watch the whole stream but props to Garrett for not replying to Phil, I really respect his play and this was good to see him take the high road
He shoulda said, "Well, if it wasn't for luck, you'd win every hand."
"I couldn't put him on QJ." Uh, Mike there a 100 other combination of hands Garrett could have had there.
Are you a good pokerplayer ?
Corey Machowski right rule one when you play the pots with garrett dudes ganna wreck you
@@frankjordan7919 I'll tell you who isn't s good poker player. Mike Matusow.
@@barygol Are you better than him ?
"100 other hand combinations he could have"
89 clueless donks liked this comment!
Flop 8,9,10 Turn K and River 6
This gives the following possible hands to beat AA on the board.
66,88,99,1010,KK, Any 7 combined with any card from 2 to Ace, JQ, K10, K9, K8, K6, 10/9, 10/8, 10/6, 98,97,96, 67,68,, J7
Did I miss any?
That's 19 hands that straight up beat AA after all 5 community cards are played. We can make it 20 hands with 7 plus any card as it's only the 7 that makes the straight from the two hole cards. No point in me adding 27,37,47,57,77,Q7,K7 or A7 it's the 7 that would make the 6,7,8,9,10 straight.
Imagine the feeling of making 2 legends argue like children and contemplate how you do it out loud. LOL
Garrett comfortably discounted QJ from Mike's 4-bet range, so how to get it in next?😉...high variance plays make for towering stax when they come in! The slo-mo meltdown from Hellmuth in the aftermath was hilarious, while Garrett showed just why he's truly a world class player AND human being....excellence defined.
Congrats to GMan, Ryan & the entire LATB crew for getting to 100K subs!
Yea I thought the same thing, Garrett knew he didn't have Q,J..
@@streetbaby8026 Exactly lol who 4bets with QJ?
If worldclass means always hitting a straight in flop or sets or flush then he world class. I would totally kick that dude ass in heads up and im not heads player so far all I saw that garret dude doing is getting lucky boards never i saw a good read call on bluffs he sucks
have you guys considered making the pot size, on an all-in, reflect the effective stack rather than the big stack?
Makes the total pot more realistic
PaddyODour ^
Good idea. And it's especially significant here since Matusow only left himself 12k behind when raising on the turn. So it was 12k to win 82k. Matusow is almost obligated to call, which makes his click back raise look pretty dumb.
They would but sometimes people are behind on chips. It does reflect correctly when all in is called after. But if you can’t do the math, I feel bad for you son lol
Min raising the turn makes no sense
fingsthegreat none absolutely none
Yep, if he just calls and the third spade comes on the river that also completes the straight he probably can get away from it with 22K still behind.
He plays way above his stakes he's basically broke. Playing poker that way will cause you to make terrible mistakes just because of your anxiety. That's the only thing I can think of
He raised the turn, cause he was lost. Garret is to much for these two clowns
It could be a good play if Garrett had a set, as it may cause Garrett to slow down. But generally it's still a bad play as most players won't fold or slow down a set
Garrett is so lucky. He never loses a hand its ridiculous. Seen him make good lay downs and good plays but dam he is so lucky!!
This has to be my all time favorite poker video. Unfreaking real.
They needed to put the Clock on Garrett, he took a lot of time stacking all of his chips.
In one hand, we can see the future of poker, Garett! And the past, with Mike and Phil! Phil is a kid!
Phil is best player ever. His bracelets prove that
Geeze Phil Hellmuth still stuck in the old school mentality. No one plays like that anymore. He can’t adjust to the modern styles.
Imagine thinking calling a 3bet with 67s and extra odds vs a spew nit would be a bad play. He doesn't get it.
@@Green58211 How is calling 3.1k profitable when at most he's getting 37k stack from Mike? Flopping a straight/flush/2pair won't occur often enough to make it worth it. Of course, you'd have to not be a donk and stroke aggrotard's genitals to understand that. A 5% chance to flop well, you better be getting 20x effective call size at least when you hit. This is basic math. Something the new aggrotards are supposed to be good at.
@@DoctorChained If we give mike a range of JJ+ AQs+ and one bluff like a5s, Garrett is already getting nearly 2-1, and Mike plays notoriously terrible fit/fold/spew in these spots
@@Green58211 Lol @ giving Mike bluffs. Just lol...
@@DoctorChained Remove that hand and chance he ever bluffs/spews here and it changes equities by a little over one percent
just love it when Garrett puts his head down And stacks his chips..
Gotta love how Helmuth thinks 5k is so much... but when you short buy all the time... I guess it is...🤣🤣
Right? Haha. I don’t think there’s a hand Garrett can fold to that 3b size IP
@@erikkoch1923 he can fold big offsuit cards that play horribly vs the old washed up face up nit's range
Tommy Fu true. I also didn’t catch that it was a 4b the first time I watched. Still a great price and so deep, hard to fold much. But yeah if Garrett had KJo or something, agree, gotta ditch it.
@@erikkoch1923 It's not a great price. Mike's effective stack size is 37k. 76s has only a 5% chance to flop strong, so you better be getting 20x call size when you hit. Mike's stack isn't big enough, but keep calling with 76s donks. You're the kind of player I profit against.
DoctorChained It would be facing a 3b which is what I thought it was when half watching the first time through. Anyway poker is played with 5 cards, the ability to bluff and Garrett has position. It’s fine.
Garrett has ice in his veins. Totally unique style. Love watching him calculate
76 suited is one of the best hands to crack AA
Actually I think statistically it is the #1 hand to beat Aces. And when Aces lose it's often to a straight. All of which occurred here.
I thought it was 5-6 souted!?
Why is 67 the best hand to crack aces with? Pocket pairs are better right? It's less likely to flop two pair than a set
@@bruceleggett7500 you are forgetting straight and flush odds
@@jjackish 5 ,6 suited is the best hand to crack aces
Could easily have put Garret on set ,,everyone new what Mikey had imo
Michael Munslow yeah I think Garrett’s line looked a lot like a set of 8s or 9s
Yeah he just screamed Aces or Kings because he never mixes in any semi bluffs in his pre flop 4 betting range
I like how LATB hearts their comments selectively.
Man... Garrett seems to be in every single high stakes stream game at every venue.
Garrett and his permanent run good lol
That is such a retarded comment SD. Garrett is a high stakes player and doesn’t mind calling a 3x bet and folding if he doesn’t hit the flop. Some guys are just born with a horseshoe up their ass
@@SD-ni6qe thats not true. He knows matusow has a strong hand like AA and if he hits he will get paid.
I dont think you can decide who is a good player and who is a bad player, because he is playing high stakes and you are sitting at home watching him play
@@SD-ni6qe The fact Mike is so tight is the reason Garrett calls with 76ss. Dont you understand?
@@edwardkim639 exactly what I thought. What a assenine comment from an obvious micro donk. This is a deep cash game & 67 suited is a perfect hand to call a 4 bet with.
@@SD-ni6qe Re-read what you wrote. From 1,700, Garrett basically only had to call 3k more. Mike didn't even 3x Garrett's re-raise. Lol. Stupid 4bet sizing by Mike. Plus, Garrett wasn't only going to play his cards, he was going to play position, he was going to take advantage of scary boards and he was going to play Mike.
5:53 that face you make when you know you're probably beat but you gotta call because you're too deep into the hand lol
LOL it's hilarious to see Matusow sit there after Garrett goes all in on the turn. He knew he was a donk that got in too deep at that moment.
The "Master" getting maximum value Every Single Time!!!
Watching Garrett play poker is like watching messi play football!!!
Feels so good to see him get stacked lol
Lol Phil tilting on Mikes behalf cos he staked him
I love when Hellmuth criticizes the hands. 🤣
Nobody wants to hear a winner talk
Mike: "oh why don't you talk Phil?" lmao
Hands like this is why:
1. Position is so important
2. Range advantage + board coverage is a winning combo
3. Playing 67 suited as if you have 10's, JJ, QQ or AK creates a recipe for success.
Well done!
Not sure why preflop Mike only 4 bets $3100 more with a $42k stack vs a guy who has him covered who also has position. Seems to be a time to make it $7-8k to give a pocket pair or suited connector a bad price to call. Garrettt is getting like 14:1 implied odds with his 76s in position heads up.
@@mike88g1 Yeah, it's just, it makes it really easy for Garrett to just peel the flop with 55 or something, and just stack Mike who is going to be weighted toward JJ+ a ton. It just makes the hand pretty easy to play from Garrett's perspective. Obv it depends on how Garrett plays when the board comes 962 etc, how often he calls flop/turn unimproved, but if he only gets it in when he flops pair+draw or flop straight, 2 pair, trips, flush etc, he's doing alright with the call.
sean cosgrove Exactly. Stupid 4bet sizing pre-flop by Mike.
Fearless Garrett - love the way he play
Garrett runs better than Ex-Lax
“What do you thank I have phil? A set” even Mike’s ashamed of his donk play
Thank goodness it wasn’t Phil who had the Aces
That would have been the biggest meltdown ever.
he would have flipped the table lol
ya but he had a 50 percent share in mike the mouth so thats why he was pissed . that hand cost phil 20k lol
Sean Tran .... Phil is a total nit, he would have check folded the flop.
The opening of this clip gave me a tiny bit of respect for Hellmuth. The rest of it is why I despise him.
Despise him? Apparently you're as emotional as he is. What you need to understand is that Phil still has intermediate-level player emotions. And that's why many people laugh at his emotional reactions. He complains about people's actions. If he name-called a lot as well, that would be crossing the line.
@@theejayzeeable The whole UltimateBet thing, berating amateurs who bought in to tourneys with their own money when Phil was sponsored. Phil not name-calling? Calling people idiots doesn't count?
Watched it live legendary
The Matusow blow up, you got to love it. Some things never change. 😂
Garret, is a rock star.
Dude Yes , getting smacked over the head with the deck just about every time he plays doesn’t hurt
Legend says Phil is still talking to himself till this day.
Back to the kiddie game down the street
🔥 GARRETT THE GOAT!
JJ: “And mike knows when it goes 3B on the turn AA are not good”
Me: does he tho?
yeah he was giving mike way too much credit. That was maybe the worst line he could take to 4bet small, x/c, x/r 2/3 of stack then call off . not sure what he could do that would be worst
I think he knew he was beat on the flop. Look at his sad face and dejected expression @4:00
One of the easiest laydowns ever. He did realize he only had 1 pair. That board was plenty wet for a 4 bet call pre flop. Pocket 8's, 9's or 10's could've easily played that line. Q-J suited, 10-9 suited is easily there. Maybe a timid KK pre is there too.
He knows he’s beat 99% but that 1% ego that doesn’t wanna fold will lose 100% of your money.
@@harleycoleman5199 Exactly right, all in on the turn would have me out with pocket aces. I would've put GMan on a set most likely kings but never a straight. I would've folded to the all in with just Aces
Nothing I love hearing more than Phil complaining & Mike silencio!
I like how Phil comes in and announces that 'I have four things to say to everybody' and then proceeds to list off four items of varying importance one of which includes getting a coffee. It shows that his thinking is very methodical which is no wonder considering his astounding success at poker.
Phil and Mike playing with the big boys...
Are we gonna be able to watch this whole video soon if we missed the stream?
Yeah for $19.99 a month..😀
Garrets an alien.. No human being runs this good.
People who still idolize Phil reassure me that poker is still beatable
honey he called me with QT !! whaaaaaaa xD
Garrett is always coolering people beyond belief.
I like how the pros know mike, and Phil are always soft playing each other but they dont care because they're happy to have fish$$$ at the table
Mike ‘typewriter jaw’ Matusow poppin them thangs all day everyday
Like a boss Garrett doesn’t even pause n ask him what he said
Why is it sick, Phil? Garrett had $100k in his stack and gambled 5% for a shot to crack a big pair. The poker brat thing was played out 20 years ago
i know mike hand was practically face up who wouldn't want to play knowing where you are 100% of the way. phil thinks only 3-5 hands should call any raise utter nonsense
4-bet, not a “cold 4-bet” by MM preflop. “Cold” doesn’t mean “out of position” or “sick,” it means you had no money in the pot before you raised. I see this term misused a lot these days.
Tavish McDonell thanks for the info
Well, that you didn't voluntarily put money in. You can cold 4-bet from the blinds.
hahhahahahaha i love it!!
Phil was the one that got tiltet the most from that beat :D
Out of all the famous names and bracelets at the table, I'd put my money on Garett or Andy. (latb represent)
Jungle is a million times the cash game player as anybody else in the game, not even close.
@@timothyburke7088 Jungle is definitely a good player, but saying he is million times better than GMan or Andy is just exaggerating. And yeah, I would also put my money on Jungle, Gman or Andy any day over Phil or Mike.
@@timothyburke7088 Jungle didn't seem to play well in this game. I'm not sure if it was the lower stakes than he was used to or if he was just bored but he seemed to be giving action with some pretty awful hands.
And don't forget Art. He's as good as both other two
@@cristiandancheceanu3242 Art and Andy are my 1 and 1A.
Oh nice, they showed Phil's classy "I have a piece" speech. Oh... Wait... 😂
I dont get why people say it was a bad call preflop in position with 67s.. he needs to call 3100 to win 10200 so 3100/10200= 30%... he needs 30% equity just to breakeven.
Worst case scenario he has 22% equity against matusows nittiest range (KK+), and he already has 33% equity if Matusow can have AK too.. All this without considering implied odds:
If Garret makes a strong hand like a flush/straight/two pair/trips he also gets to win a lot of what Matusow has behind, which is around 37k. So lets say implied odds give Garrett an extra 15k on average when he makes his hand (since even if Garrett makes his hand Matusow can still get away from it some of the time or outdraw Garrett by the river), hes now calling 3100 to win 25200 (10200 of the total pot + 15k of Implied odds).. thus getting 3100/25200 = 12%.. only 12% equity needed to make the call!! Super profitable play by Garrett.
it was 3100 to call to win 7175...not 10200
@@revnecro1273 no, its 10200. the division 3100/10200 (3100/10275 = 0.3017 to be exact) tells you how much the risk weighs related to the total amount you receive back.
you can see the numbers add up:
if 30.17 out of 100 times he wins $7175, then... 30,17 * 7175 = +$216470 (approximately)
if the other 69.83/100 times he loses his $3100 bet... then 69.83 * -3100 = -216470 (approximately)
$216470 - $216470 = 0
to add some context, it felt like Garret was taking a stand against the 'pros' in this hand, Phil was needling him a bit right before this hand for playing so tight. He wasnt playing many hands compared to the usual Gman were used to seeing every week.
Cool story bro.
@@haranglouis5252 Knowing that you liked the story makes me absurdly jubilant.
I could watch Matusow getting stacked all day
Preflop 4 bet size is horrible by Mike especially against Garrett who will call 100% of his range against that 4 bet size. He should’ve made it somewhere between $8.5k-$9.5k
Hilarious how Helmuth pulls out a single wad of $10,000 cash from his coat pocket like it was nothing
he was the short stack thou LOL
“I hate when that weird stuff happens.” - Phil
Didn’t know a straight was weird stuff phil.
He has to control his breathing. His heart is coming out of his body. A sure tell he has a monster hand.
How do you do that? It still happens to me even though I do cardio regularly......
Why couldnt heavy breathing indicate a bluff? I feel like Garrett behaves very similarly whenever he moves all-in, whether he has the goods or not.
Suited connectors are my fav hands in poker. I love 9 ❤️ 10 ❤️.
This hand is literally the definition of implied odds which phil clearly doesnt understand
Mike doesn't have enough for the implied odds to be there. A suited connector should have about 20x behind the final raise. 11x is not enough.
@@DoctorChained about 5% of the poker players understand what you mean.
Mike has the aces so his actions aren’t really implied odds based. I was referring to Garrett calling the 4 bet pre-flop. And I think it’s very reasonable to mix in some suited connectors in this spot as a call and as a bluff 5 bet against some players. Against Mike, who’s a tight player, he prob closes down mikes range to AA,AK,KK,QQ and maybe AQs and JJ. For Garrett, once he flopped the nuts, it’s all about max value. There’s no more implied odds past the flop
@@HOUKAIJIA Bet-to-stack ratio for calling a reraise with a suited connector should be 20:1. So the stacks should be around 20x the size of the preflop bet you're calling.
In other words, Mike could get stacked every single time 76s hits the flop and he'd still be making money long term because 76s doesn't hit often enough.
@@DoctorChained Totally agree with you on this.
I predict this coming Friday will have the most views on youtube during live stream. On to this hand, I love how Phil is angry about the 76ss hand selection, cause he backed Mike. In position deep stacked, if you're going to 3 bet 67ss folding to a 4-bet when you're getting 2 to. 1 in position with over 400 BBs effective would be bad. I personally think GA played this hand fine. Folding pre is fine as well but once you raise I don't think you should be folding even tho Mike choose a rather large 4 bet size. A 4-bet is so strong it doesn't need to be that big. Now you're going to be OOP with 1 pair(most likely) in a bloated pot. Not sure what Mike's raise was here on the turn??? Id be looking to get to showdown as cheaply as possible.
If mike bets flop he should be able to fold by the river, but he decided to trap himself for some crazy reason.
I've won more with suited connectors like that than actual Aces. I love those hands especially when they crack aces or kings!
1st rate entertainment LATB, thanks guys. ;)
Mike’s raise on the turn accomplishes nothing
I hope Phil apologized to Garrett. He was pretty disrespectful.
phil is so lost he thinks his ego should dictate how you should play. who wouldn't want to defend there 3bet against a opponent who is practically playing there hand face up. its ridiculous
s0ldier898 he’s whining because he has a stake of Mike and is loosing money when Mike gets felted
Where was my notification before this game got started!? I’m so sick. I’m sure this game was juicy.
How about the ending when Hellmuth pocketed $18,000 from Mikes stack to "come off" his stake while the game is still going?
It always amuses me how many people think they should automatically win because they have aces 😂
How weird is it when suddenly a third player starts whining and bittering your sweet juicy pot because he had a share.
I thought exactly that. Given that he was so upset about it, how could he be trusted not to tactically favour Matusow in the game. Talk about a conflict of interest. I would never knowingly play against people in whose interest it is to team up against me. Madness.
@@emdiar6588 you will definitely let them play when they are the two weakest players at the table by far. If you have two suckers at the table then let them do whatever they want against each other, and take their money....
G man making Friday great again
Serious question why doesn't Phil buy in for the max when he plays cash games. He has the bankroll edge on basically every player and can bully people. Yet this dude buys in for like 5k with guys like Garret at the table with 130k to his left
He knows that most of the other players at the table play cash games much better than he does, so he doesn’t want to risk very much.
Its awesome when hellmuth tilts when hes not even involved in the hand lol
Does Phil ever play cash games or understand Garett using some sort of bluffs in his 3 betting ranges
Phil plays cash games like he's playing a tournament. I'm convinced he wouldn't be profitable against decent 5-10$ players.
That’s why Garret been killing it in cash games the last 10 years !
“so sick” haha
Все супер, спасибо за видео! Garret champion