Was Pope Benedict XVI's Resignation Valid? | Steven O'Reilly
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- Dr. Robert Moynihan and Matt Gaspers welcome author Steven O'Reilly to discuss what has become an increasingly hot topic in recent years: Was Pope Benedict XVI's resignation valid? Mr. O'Reilly has written a book on the subject and will share his insights. His book is available for purchase here: www.amazon.com....
We appreciate you! Thank you for watching our videos.
If you're enjoying the content, consider supporting Urbi et Orbi by joining our Locals community or giving a one-time donation. By joining, you'll get access to exclusive content, live Q&A discussions with Dr. Moynihan and special guests, and community-driven events! Your support helps us keep creating and connecting. Thank you!
Locals Link: urbietorbicomm...
If you have any issues, please reach out to usoffice@insidethevatican.com
Join us on our next Pilgrimage/Retreat with Father Murr in Spain: $300 Off Discount Code "SUMMER" insidethevatic...
JOIN DR. MOYNIHAN AT CHRISTMAS IN ITALY FOR THE OPENING OF THE JUBILEE YEAR: insidethevatic...
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY ON LOCALS: urbietorbicomm.... Use promo code RUclips to support us at the discounted rate of $5.00 a month. Your support keeps our work independent and keeps you connected!
SIGN UP FOR THE FREE MOYNIHAN LETTERS: insidethevatic...
SUPPORT OUR WORK TO BRING UNITY WITHIN THE CHURCH: urbietorbicomm...
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR BI-MONTHLY MAGAZINE: insidethevatic...
EXPERIENCE A BEAUTIFUL AND JOYFUL PILGRIMAGE: insidethevatic...
Its absurd to think that prostrating yourself before a Pachamama statue isnt idolatry... a violation of #1 of the Ten Commandments.
Yes. Worship is for God alone.
YEAH!! Welcome to 2 of my Favorite Hosts, ofcourse, our Son, Matt Gaspers, fortunately now working with Dr. Robert Moynihan...seems to be a GREAT Team of mutual Respect!! Hello from Colorado!! This topic has certainly been a question in my heart!!
I think Dr. Edmund Mazza makes a much better argument for the fact that Pope Benedict XVI did not resign.
I have no doubt he was forced out by the evil SG Mafia.
@@genevievekelly1792 on what evidence
O'Reilly's work in the CIA leaves him suspect. Was JFK the victim of a lone gunman? Most serious people highly doubt it. That is just my take.
Thank you for proving to me with your program that Benedict was forced out. I was on the fence before; munus/ministerium.
Hello Gentlemen 😇 So happy to have "joined" the effort of Urbi et Orbi Communications.
pls have Dr Mazza DEBATE STEVEN O'Reilly.
Why was there white smoke issued twice in 1958? Was Cdl. Fri ejected but forced to not accept? The second time smoke was evident, Cdl. Roncalli claimed the papacy
Good to know therd are good Catholic men like Steven defending 🇺🇲!!! +DG+
Robert, I am glad that you are bringing out this information because I think it has a lot to do with Benedict’s resignation. There is more to this than meets the eye.
The resorting to presenting a CIA stooge to make the case that their coup against the Church was legitimate is an interesting programming choice. Matt Gaspers is working way too hard to make the case that the pagan Bergoglio is pope.
We act like Benedict, after he resigned, was a deaf mute with no hands to write with. Knowing the controversy over his resignation, the one thing he never did was explain why he did not resign the “munis.” He never said, “oh, I just thought it was a synonym.” Or, “I made a mistake. I really meant munis. Oops!” All Benedict would have had to done in the many years of his “retirement” would have been to say, “sorry for the confusion. I chose to use ministeria rather than munis because [whatever]…”. Why didn’t he?
Obviously, by his actions and by his title, “pope emeritus,” he believed he remained a kind of “pope.” And that is a heretical belief. And that makes his resignation invalid, which is the case that Ed Mazza makes, which was not fully explored. If you look at Benedict’s writings, it is clear he had a heretical view of the papacy, which was commented on by Bergoglio.
The enemies of the Church have a modus operandi of taking the power away and leaving the person with the title. They have done this with kings and emperors, and now with the Church. Benedict acted more like a pope in his retirement than Bergoglio ever has. And that should tell us something.
@@josephcillojr.7035 your sedevacantism is refuted by Etsi Multa
@@matthewschmidt5069
Your paganism is noted. A pagan cannot be pope. Deal with it. The chair is often empty. A pagan is never pope.
@@josephcillojr.7035 The chair is never empty for this long and without the Cardinals voting. Try again. Anti Popes only exist when there is a claimant. You have yet to prove anything about the ceremony other than what the media has told you
Interesting choice of words “CIA stooge…”
I don’t find this gentleman believable. Just knowing the involvement of this agency in the reforms of CVII, should tell you everything you need to know.
@@mercedesaschenbrenner9352
The first thing they teach agency assets is how to lie. And, they don’t stop lying once they are “former intelligence assets,” which was fully on display in the 2020 election. When you hear CIA, think “liar.”
Homosexual blessings are not possible in the Catholic Church. God did not will all religions. Matthew 19:9 clearly states Christ's view on divorce and re-marriage. Idolatry is forbidden according to the first commandment. There is not one saint in heaven that accepts these diabolical teachings. 2 Thess.2:11-12 and 2 Cor. 4:4 are two verses of Sacred Scripture that explain this time of " diabolical disorientation." God bless and do not accept these novel teachings.
What was the role of bertone and his group in this benedict XVI episode. There are many many machinations in benedict XVI papacy leading to his sudden and premature departure. Leaving many unanswered questions.
A bifurcated Papacy is a novel teaching and contrary to the intention of Christ. Christ gave the keys to one man, not two. This erroneous view of the Papacy held by Benedict invalidated his resignation.Pope St.Felix states," Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend the truth is to suppress it, and indeed to neglect to confound evil men, when we can do it, is no less a sin than to encourage them." The vast majority of presbyters and predates remain silent while the wild boar from the forest continues to lay waste the vineyard. Cowardice in battle is not a virtue. And yes we do need to pray and fast for these men.
Maybe interview someone who holds the position that Benedict did not abdicate.
In the confused, murderous, very sinful upside down world where contradictory claims abound on every topic and where truth is obscured, recall, Christ guaranteed His and that means He ensures all that is needed to do that happens. Thus, good pope, bad pope the church goes on. The present pope IS the pope, he absolutely is the pope. Benedict did indeed resign and said he did so freely. Benedict should be taken at his word.
As for the present pontiff, there is no guarantee that the conclave will select the "right" pope. Indeed over the centuries there has been much intrigue and manipulation of and by the office. Nonetheless the office persists. Nothing the current pontiff has done that affects the teachings of the faith has been done in such a way as to be heretical.
It is things like the pope's odd document for blessings of homosexual "individuals" done openly and optically as a blessing of a couple via Fr. Martin, are, to me, optically a scandal and a form of soft grooming of the lay people. Such would be in the goals of Fr. Martin, i.e. normalizing the abnormal.
That document and others, as well as the wooden thing in the garden, interviews by communists who claim the pope said hell would be abolished and or the souls in it, all represent the failure to teach and uphold the teachings of the faith when needed by the pope. These things, in my estimation are, to me, grave failures in his duty to the people of God. I have noted many other things, too numerous to mention that have, by all appearances, and by my lights, been indicative of a failure in leadership and damaging to the church.
To me, this pope is not a father.
As for his office, he is indeed the pope. Aside from this, we are living in a world of such lies in the media and such diabolical division and confusion that men now claim to be women and compete in women's sprots in the secular realm, Jesuit superiors don't believe in Satan, Biden trots up to communion, Trump and his wife get snubbed by the cardinal in DC while visiting a shrine, a Texas bishop gets the axe, and a predatory prelate gets advanced to high offices, despite his victims.
What can we say but that the corruption is deep and in high places. But it was deep and in high places at the last supper too.
There should be nobody who identifies as a "Trad" or a "conservative Catholic" or a "liberal catholic" the ONLY identifying monikers should be: Catholic, fallen-Catholic, or non-Catholic. Because that is ALL there is. It is my hope the self-righteous wherever they are found get a grip and stop assisting in the division of the church. It should be clear as day to anyone that there is at this time a deep diabolical power seeking to destroy the West, the nations of earth, mankind and hope and unity. There IS a thick smoke of Satan these days, KNOW IT, don't let the smokescreens, and the continual gaslighting of the media lead you away.
Pray, hope, and don't worry! Try Fr. Dolindo's surrender prayer and move on.
Pope Benedict 16th siad," he resigned publically and that the seat of Peter would be vacant ", means he willingly handed in his resignation as Pope. No one held a gun to his head. It was publically done.
He also doubled down on this shortly before he died. I don't think he would try to deceive anyone that he had resigned, when intentionally he hadn't. That would be detremental to his own soul, and, he would have known there cannot be a sharing of The Papacy between two Bishops.
He vacated the seat of Saint Peter physically which also adds to the fact that he was leaving the seat empty, by flying away to allow a new Conclave convene.
Thank you for this valuable discussion. It makes sense.
Those who argue the contrary look for a needle in the haystack and there's not even a needle there.
1:07:02 Exactly. And seeing who was standing around him was chilling! Then the lightening bolt strike on the dome after his resignation; another chilling sign of things to come.
1:13:45 They sadly got what they wanted, their meddling & reference to "4r4b Spring" is grotesque. There needs to be more discussion regarding support for that horrid ideology as it's poison is devouring €.
I'd really like to hear more about the investigation into the curia that PB ordered!
Thanks for the discussion Dr. M, Matt & Steven!👍
The box was incinerated along with the evidence
Probably unfortunately. Would really like to know what the report said! Did AB. Viganò show his report to Dr. Moynihan or is there any reportage on its contents?
A valid resignation - NOT!
He had the power to select a couple of strong Archbishops/Cardinals to run interference for him while he remained Pope!!!’
He must have known that a Pope Francis was going to be elected, so why did he resign???
the odds of bergolio becoming nxt pope after benedict were 1:200
Didn’t bother listening to this episode
Pope Francis was universally accepted. Its absurd to think the entire body of the Church can err. It has never happened and never will happen.
I invite you to read Matthew McCusker's article called "Why universal and peaceful acceptance doesn't prove Francis is pope". In that article he picks apart the universal acceptance argument bit by bit. I'd be surprised if you don't change your mind after reading it.
@mistermonqui819 I don't have to read the book when I know Francis has canonized people. Try again. Moreover, it is absurd to think Christ would allow his Church to completely err. Do you really believe that?
@@matthewschmidt5069Hmm. Arianism maybe?
Also there is at least one point in Church history in which the pope had been universally accepted and was later declared to be an anti-pope. It may have been during the time of St. Catherine of Siena, not sure. But it IS a historical fact.
Universal acceptance is not iron clad. This is a very unfortunate situation that none of us should get steamed up over; after all, God is in control and is allowing this problem. We have to do our best to keep His commandments and the Precepts of the Church regardless of the legitimacy of the pontiff.
@@matthewschmidt5069 It's not a book, it's an article on LifeSiteNews and is worth the read. And no, I don't believe the Church has completely erred, I am simply addressing your original post that Francis' so-called "universal" acceptance necessarily means he's the pope.
@@matthewschmidt5069
It is absurd to think a pagan is pope. You cannot heal evil by accepting it peacefully. That is the absurdity. Hyper papalists are putting God in a box and telling us that what is cannot be. Pick your absurdity. My choice is the criminals in the church forced out the true pope and accepted one of their own as pope. You believe the church just one day decided to put a pagan in charge and could not have erred. Sorry, I like my absurdity better. Lol.