Thank you, that was very helpful. The sentence structure gives me difficulties in longer sentences. I've only been learning Chinese for four weeks, so I'm hoping I can get the problem under control.
❤Good lesson. Everything is clear and makes sense. One thing to add is that the more description you add to a Chinese sentense the more weird it gets, because Chinese is a left wing language. So, make short sentenses and be happy😂
This is SO BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!! This illustrates SO CLEARLY where I have be having trouble with my sentence structure! Am I correct in thinking other adverb/prepositional phrases of place, time, cause/effect would occupy the same place as the location marker in your example? If so, I have just taken a huge step forward in my understanding of Mandarin syntax .... 谢谢你
I just found your channel! I've been studying mandarin for a little bit over a year, but the sentence structure have always messed with my head (I understand the S+location+(AV)/V+V+O, but when it becomes a longer sentence I just kind of lose it. Really enjoyed how you present the topic of the video!
Thanks a million for your great videos! I'm totally new to Chinese so I am still practicing my "sounds" x,sh, ... but I pause and try to shadow your pronunciation.
Subject and object are functions, where verb is a kind. Basic grammar teaches you you can't blend kinds and functions. Either use noun phrase + verb + non phrase, or subject + predicate + object. You can also explain the syntax with agent + action + patient. But don't mix them up.
This is indeed true, but I would argue that at least 80% of the viewers who are helped by this video would not be splitting hairs over the nomenclature. Besides that, most prescriptive instruction on language syntax ignores your stated rule of basic grammar, since sentence order is itself often described using a mixture of the two [to wit, SVO, SOV, VSO etc].
Great explanations!! However, Predicate Noun is NOT Direct Object, despite having same location. Examples--- They eat food--- food is Direct Object--- food is receiver of Their action of eating. She is a chef--- chef is Predicate Noun--- equivalent of She
been studying Chinese of and on for years and this was about the simplest and clearest explanation I ever encountered. 非常好吧！
Cool! Glad you found it helpful :D
I'm glad that RUclips recommended this video to me! You are so good teaching, I'm learning Chinese on my own .
Your grammar videos are always such a big help! I didn't know that 不's tone would change if it's behind verbs like 是. Thank you very much! :)
我不想在饭馆吃饭 。 wo bu xiang zai fanguan chi fan. (I don’t want resturant eat) .. thanks, I enjoyed watching this :)
Thank you, that was very helpful. The sentence structure gives me difficulties in longer sentences. I've only been learning Chinese for four weeks, so I'm hoping I can get the problem under control.
Thank you!! You are a really good teacher!! I hope you will make more grammar videos in the future!!!⭐⭐⭐
Sure will! Check out my grammar playlist!
This video kicked ass! You are very wonderful teacher.
YOU ARE A GREAT TEACHER.. AM THANKFUL TO KNOW U !! Made that sooo easy and smooth
谢谢你我们的老师
我不想在饭店吃饭。
Thank you for the video. You're an amazing teacher. ❤🔛🔝
非常感谢!
❤Good lesson. Everything is clear and makes sense.
One thing to add is that the more description you add to a Chinese sentense the more weird it gets, because Chinese is a left wing language. So, make short sentenses and be happy😂
This is SO BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!! This illustrates SO CLEARLY where I have be having trouble with my sentence structure!
Am I correct in thinking other adverb/prepositional phrases of place, time, cause/effect would occupy the same place as the location marker in your example? If so, I have just taken a huge step forward in my understanding of Mandarin syntax .... 谢谢你
I just found your channel! I've been studying mandarin for a little bit over a year, but the sentence structure have always messed with my head (I understand the S+location+(AV)/V+V+O, but when it becomes a longer sentence I just kind of lose it.
Really enjoyed how you present the topic of the video!
You should be a teacher. You are soo helpful. Thanks for sending this video 👍👍👍👍🍭😊😊😊😄
You broke this down to my liking. 谢谢你
Thank you for uploading such as useful video like this .. it is very helpful for us self studying chinese
Thanks so much for explaining those points ,I got confused before because of adding locations
谢谢老师。
I am so happy to find this video and to subscribe! Your instruction is very clear and good pace for a newbie like me. 謝謝!
Thanks David! Hope you’ll find other useful videos here too😊
Nice Video for my Chinese kids
this is such a clear explainantion thank you!!
Finally an amazing grammar video
Hi, I know it's been a while since you posted this video but maybe you could do another about 会，能，要 and also the use of 吧 ? Tysm in advance
Perfect explanation! Great job!
It gets difficult when the Chinese teacher knows more about English than the native American! #Auxilary
Thanks a million for your great videos! I'm totally new to Chinese so I am still practicing my "sounds" x,sh, ... but I pause and try to shadow your pronunciation.
and by the way, are the tongue positions in this video correct? 🤔ruclips.net/video/dpQ3IMd4AMg/видео.html
Fantastic explanation!
This is a golden video .... for me !
Thank you so much, this was so clear and i was rapidly able to understand!
It's really helpful! Thanks a lot c:
谢谢你，老师。
客气了！
Love the lesson.
wondering when questioning. Why the object is always first. Then the S+V. O+s+v?
Subject and object are functions, where verb is a kind. Basic grammar teaches you you can't blend kinds and functions.
Either use noun phrase + verb + non phrase, or subject + predicate + object. You can also explain the syntax with agent + action + patient. But don't mix them up.
This is indeed true, but I would argue that at least 80% of the viewers who are helped by this video would not be splitting hairs over the nomenclature. Besides that, most prescriptive instruction on language syntax ignores your stated rule of basic grammar, since sentence order is itself often described using a mixture of the two [to wit, SVO, SOV, VSO etc].
@@cmaven4762 Precisely my point. And as a leader in helping other, if the nomenclature doesn't really matter, why not teach people the real words ?
I like the kind of situations you check. K2
What is the nuance if zai comes at the end of a sentence or sentence fragment?
我在饭馆不想吃饭。
我不想在饭馆吃饭。
Chinese=awesome
For example, 音在
such a helpful video!
I’m not discouraged just entertained 5:00.
Great explanation！ 谢谢 朋友 What if I don't want to not study in Shanghai? lol just kidding.
You are very good ❤️🌹
RUclips has just decided I’m learning Chinese now I guess
酷 谢谢 😄
很好
ok. 我在不restaraunt想吃放
我不想在(restaurant)吃饭?
Plzzz some information about HSK 3
Can you put dont want in both spots? as in "我不想在上海不想学习" ?
No, that would double the verb... just one or the other!
2:42 funny lol.
老师好！ 我不是学生也不是老师。谢谢
Very good! 不客气
xie xie lao shi !
Great explanations!!
However, Predicate Noun is NOT
Direct Object, despite having same
location. Examples---
They eat food--- food is Direct
Object--- food is receiver of Their
action of eating.
She is a chef--- chef is Predicate
Noun--- equivalent of She
I guess it would be somethingl like 我不想在餐厅吃饭
我不想在饭馆儿吃饭。
我不想在饭店吃饭
我在上海学中文。
我不在上海学习。
Xie xie lao shi
I eat rice
“She eats food”
No she eats bloody cars
No hate love ur channel
Not hate btw love ur Channel
Duolingo might disagree with you😂
@@ABChinese haha you’re right
我是学生。
我不是学生。
他不是老师。
他不吃饭。
我没有朋友。
他没有吃饭。
我想吃饭。
我不想吃饭。
我不想在饭店吃饭