Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45 - 200mm O.I.S. Mark 2 Review // Wildlife Photography in Bottrop

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024
  • In this quick review of the Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm f 4 - 5.6 O.I.S. Mark 2 I go out to my local Forest in Bottrop, Germany in search for Wildlife photography subjects.
    Shot on the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 and G81
    Contact:
    trembichmovingmoments@gmail.com
    trembichmovingmoments
    eyeem.com/trembichMM
    Want to license any of my photos?
    Contact me or try:
    www.shuttersto...

Комментарии • 45

  • @markriley7472
    @markriley7472 5 лет назад +5

    Very nice video and presentation. Good seeing more lenses with weather sealing like this. Very good value for money lens-and as you say if just a hobbyist there is no point in spending thousands of pounds on equipment/lenses. But even the cheaper lenses like this can give pleasing results, as you have shown. Thanks.

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  5 лет назад +1

      thank you very much =)

    • @hautran8486
      @hautran8486 5 лет назад +1

      Use this with em5ii has OIs or just in pana body ?
      Sory i'm not good in E? Hope you understand

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  5 лет назад

      @@hautran8486 it will still have OIS with an Olympus Body but no Dual IS like with a Panasonic camera. I think the camera will then decide wether to use the lenses stabilisier or in Body one. Generally with telephoto lenses the lens stabilisation tends to work better than IBIS.

    • @patterdalezipsuzilil
      @patterdalezipsuzilil 5 лет назад +2

      Iam thinking of this lense I have a 12to60 and a 25 f1.7 for sky shots at night on my g8 and there is no need to spend 1000nds on lenses unless being a professional with a 50 grand camera these dual ios lenses are perfect mirrorless cameras rule 😂

  • @TheMattchooo
    @TheMattchooo Год назад

    Thank you for such a detailed review. I am VERY new to photography and will be purchasing the lumix G9 Very soon and need some lenses. People like me dont need graphs, charts and all that technical rubbish. We need people like you to go out in the real world and take photos and videos on the hardware we have our eyes on. You showed that this lens ona camera not as sharp as the G9, produces beautifully sharp images and video in quite moody conditions where its cloudy and rainy. Most reviews are on sunny days which maximises the abilities of the camera/lens combo. Thanks to this review, i will be purchasing this lens along with the G9 for my wildlife photography. Keep up the great work :)

  • @GlobeHackers
    @GlobeHackers 4 года назад +3

    Good job with the Livestream. I share your work because I want people to turn away from the shit-show and focus on what's important.

  • @PtakiKujawiaki
    @PtakiKujawiaki 4 месяца назад +1

    Hi. Is Lumix g vario 45-200 Lens with power ois compatibile for any teeconverter ? I want to extend my lens as cheap as possibile. Unfortunatelly i am poor but i love bird photography

  • @garybrown9719
    @garybrown9719 3 года назад

    With the 4x teleconverter is turned on g9 i get some focus jumping

  • @menschmeier3799
    @menschmeier3799 2 года назад +2

    Tolles Video. Du hast das Objektiv an deiner g6 und g81 getestet. Macht es einen großen Unterschied, den dual ist zu nutzen? Bzw. Kannst du mit dem dual is merklich länger belichten bei 200mm als wenn du nur den Stabi im objektiv an hast?

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  2 года назад +1

      Der dual ist vor allem beim filmen ein Vorteil aber die reine Objektiv Stabilisierung ist auch schon ziemlich gut. Mit dem 100-300 2 habe ich Mal bei 1/10 Sekunde in der Dämmerung ein scharfes Bild von einem Rotkehlchen (die ja etwas geduldiger sitzen bleiben als viele andere Singvögel) machen können. Mit dem 45-200 2 kann ich es leider nicht so genau sagen und auch nicht mehr testen da ich es nicht mehr habe. Hoffe das hilft ein bisschen 😅

    • @menschmeier3799
      @menschmeier3799 2 года назад +1

      @@trembichmovingmoments8778 vielen Dank und ja auf jeden Fall hat's geholfen. Ich bin auf der Suche nach einem tele für meinen Sommerurlaub. Ich werde viel wandern und Mountainbike fahren und habe mir das 45-200 m2 rausgesucht weil's staubdicht ist. Ich Idiot habe mein 45-150 erst kürzlich verkauft um dann zu merken dass es gar nicht so einfach ist ein günstiges Tele zu finden. Wahrscheinlich hätte ich meins behalten sollen. (Auch wenn's nicht staubdicht ist und kein dual is hat)
      Hast du evtl eine Empfehlung für ein tele, welches gebraucht bis 250/300€ zu haben ist?

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  2 года назад +1

      @@menschmeier3799 in dem Preis Segment bist du perfekt für das 45-200 MK2. Ich glaube ich habe damals sogar unter 200€ für meins bezahlt (189€ oder so), da hatte ich aber auch Glück bei einer eBay Auktion.

    • @menschmeier3799
      @menschmeier3799 2 года назад +1

      @@trembichmovingmoments8778 aktuell liegt's bei Kleinanzeigen um die 250 bis 290€
      Zusammen mit meinem 12-60 ist dann quasi jede Brennweite abgedeckt, wie du es auch schon im Video gesagt hast.
      Leider muss mein Sigma 60mm 2.8 dafür gehen, was ich mittlerweile sehr zu mögen begonnen habe.
      Hast du Portraitlinsen im Bereich 40 bis 60mm? (80-120mm KB) bzw. Hast du da Lieblinge?
      Sorry, sollte deiner Zielgruppe zu liebe eig. In Englisch schreiben, nur verstehts dann gar keiner mehr xD

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  2 года назад

      @@menschmeier3799 Ne für Portraits habe ich aktuell nur das 25 f1.7. Als ich damit letztens Portraits von Arbeitskollegen gemacht habe ist mir aber aufgefallen, wie nah man damit wirklich Ran muss was nicht jeder gut haben kann. Denke die 42.5er von Olympus und Panasonic sind beide hervorragend bewertet und eines davon würde ich mir zulegen wenn ich regelmäßig Portraits machen würde.

  • @DocAlexandrite
    @DocAlexandrite 2 года назад

    This lens is on sale at a local video place, was looking to use it for filmmaking. Would it be okay for that kind of thing? Would you know? Thank you!

  • @RogueSplice
    @RogueSplice 4 месяца назад

    Are you able to reverse mount the lens hood on the lens for travel? Or do you have to have the hood stored separate off the body?

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  4 месяца назад +1

      @@RogueSplice you can reserve mount it without a problem 🙂

    • @RogueSplice
      @RogueSplice 4 месяца назад

      @@trembichmovingmoments8778 Oh awesome thank you!

  • @aimeecute4216
    @aimeecute4216 5 лет назад +6

    nice review, is it sharp for stills at the 200mm???

  • @actioncamsports
    @actioncamsports 5 лет назад +3

    Have you shot any video with this lens?

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  5 лет назад +1

      Yeah the wildlife video footage in this video as well as my "wild animals of NRW" part 2 and 3 videos. In terms of autofocus and dual is 2 I think it does a decent job but you should probably use it with a monopod when you want to shoot at 200mm since you can see every tiny hand movement because of the focal length. The stabilisation will keep jitter away but can't help you hold the field of view constant.

  • @AlexMcDougallPhotography
    @AlexMcDougallPhotography 4 года назад +3

    A great real life review of this lens. Are you still happy with the lens and is it sharp enough? Thanks

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  4 года назад +1

      I had very decent results with it but I got the 100-300mk2 for its longer reach and subsequently sold the 45-200 as I did not use it anymore. It's the better multi purpose lens of the two but the 100-300 is the better dedicated wildlife lens. I made a comparison video of the two as well.

    • @AlexMcDougallPhotography
      @AlexMcDougallPhotography 4 года назад +1

      @@trembichmovingmoments8778 ok thanks for the reply. I think ultimately I will probably get the 100-300mm. Are you happy with that?

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  4 года назад +1

      @@AlexMcDougallPhotography it's a fantastic lens if you are serious about wildlife photography. It's to expensive (and bit as flexible) to be your "I need to have a Tele lens sometines"

    • @AlexMcDougallPhotography
      @AlexMcDougallPhotography 4 года назад +1

      @@trembichmovingmoments8778 Planning to use it for landscape and fast jet photography.

  • @Kolegu
    @Kolegu 5 лет назад +4

    I'm thinking to buy this lens for motorsport photography on the budget... how is the focusing on moving subjects? I've tested the 35-100mm f2.8 Panasonic, and it amazed me how sharp that lens is and how fast is focusing on moving subjects. Thank you for the video, keep up the good work!

    • @trembichmovingmoments8778
      @trembichmovingmoments8778  5 лет назад

      Thank you 🙂
      Well the tracking focus for small birds is not all that good but I think for motorsports it should be OK as the subject is likely to be much bigger in the frame. I sadly never had the chance to test the 35-100mm f2.8 but I'm guessing the focusing of the budget friendly 45-200mm mk2 will not be comparable. One shot focus is instant but tracking is not so good.

  • @f1pitpass
    @f1pitpass 2 года назад

    thank you

  • @TheophilusCarlos
    @TheophilusCarlos 2 года назад

    Great review. New subscriber here.

  • @sportlivevasfedua4299
    @sportlivevasfedua4299 5 лет назад +1

    Супер,45-200mm

  • @sumanthvarma6959
    @sumanthvarma6959 2 года назад

    Is this lens compatible with lumix g7?

    • @brhodes2287
      @brhodes2287 2 года назад

      Yes! It's a micro four thirds lens.

  • @northof-62
    @northof-62 5 лет назад +3

    01:55 24 to 400 mm ? You mean 90 to 400 mm equiv.

    • @JamesAnderson-wft
      @JamesAnderson-wft 4 года назад +1

      No, he doesn't. He's talking about having the 12-60 lens and the 45 to 200. Or the equivalent of 24 to 400, just as he said. Listen, before presuming.

    • @northof-62
      @northof-62 4 года назад

      @@JamesAnderson-wft Thx, I'm gonna replay and listen again.

    • @JamesAnderson-wft
      @JamesAnderson-wft 4 года назад +1

      @@northof-62 I think I was a bit abrupt. I apologise.

    • @northof-62
      @northof-62 4 года назад

      @@JamesAnderson-wft at 1:30 he says 90-400. And you were correct - he did say "with the 12-60" at 1:50. I missed that. Thx

  • @androidgameplays4every13
    @androidgameplays4every13 2 года назад

    The mk1 version is compatible with the G85?