He didn't win by much. The Benz is somewhat tuned from the factory and has more HP than the stock XFR. Tune the XFR and change the exhaust and the results would be much different. Nice run though!
Joe, Let's keep it civil, and not make references to someone being 'retarded', because we have a difference of opinions. My comment was based on on the 'factory' specs of both cars in which the 2010 XFR has a higher HP rating (510) than the same model year CLS 63 AMG which has 507, respectfully! Based upon all the standard factors (e.g., weight, torque, HP, etc.), it would seem that the R would've won, since it doesn't weigh as much and has more HP. And, for the record I know that both cars are factory 'tuned' performance cars. I'm partial to Jags!
He didn't win by much. The Benz is somewhat tuned from the factory and has more HP than the stock XFR. Tune the XFR and change the exhaust and the results would be much different. Nice run though!
+Joe Pinder agreed....
Joe,
Let's keep it civil, and not make references to someone being 'retarded', because we have a difference of opinions. My comment was based on on the 'factory' specs of both cars in which the 2010 XFR has a higher HP rating (510) than the same model year CLS 63 AMG which has 507, respectfully! Based upon all the standard factors (e.g., weight, torque, HP, etc.), it would seem that the R would've won, since it doesn't weigh as much and has more HP. And, for the record I know that both cars are factory 'tuned' performance cars. I'm partial to Jags!
What's the numbers?
Don't feel bad. A stock xfr is not even supposed to beat that car.
Need a better driver for the jag
Xfr time?
11.7@122
11.7@122mph
usasupra23 what did the cls run