Affordable and Effective Alternatives to Woodpeckers Squares

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии • 285

  • @jsboening
    @jsboening Год назад +8

    I have 4 Swanson combination squares in various sizes. They have all been extremely accurate. Great value for the money.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Love the swanson speed square and combination square. Totally agree, some of the best value for your money! Thanks for watching jsboening!

  • @bradysstewart
    @bradysstewart Год назад +16

    I have a cheaper alternative for the T square. I bought a drywall T square from Lowes a few years ago. It's 48" and amazingly accurate. I use it quite a bit to break down my full sheet goods.

    • @louiswhitney1761
      @louiswhitney1761 Год назад +4

      I did the same but measurements are far from accurate… I think the end is more than an inch off…

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Oh, thanks for sharing Brady, If I needed one of those that would have been another excellent tool to feature as an alternative. Thank you so much for sharing and watching!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Ugh, that sucks! Can you return it. That's rediculous!

    • @hansangb
      @hansangb Год назад

      It's OK for rough cutting. But I tested three and all were off by more than an 1/8" But for Drywall work, that's perfectly acceptable. Considering you need space for the mud to do its thing. And it's fine for rough breakdown so you can fine tune it on a tablesaw.

  • @shadowulf
    @shadowulf Год назад +8

    For sheet goods, I've used the humble drywall tee square.
    They are light, have measurement marks on the tee and the cross, and can be used as a straight edge in layout.
    No pencil holes, and maybe not as accurate as the WPs. But for under $30, it is a multifunctional tool

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Love it, you can't beat it for the price! Keep it up and thanks for watching Shadowulf!

    • @meatballsalad
      @meatballsalad 11 месяцев назад

      Same here brother! Can't be beat imo

  • @charlesenfield2192
    @charlesenfield2192 Год назад +4

    I drilled and tapped a hole in end of the short beam my framing square and screwed a small, rectangular aluminum tab perpendicular to the beam, which supports the end of the square on the workpiece. This is a reasonable mod for me because I rarely use my framing square for anything other than layout work on sheet goods. That said, I do use it for roofing and stairs, but only once every year or two. When I am using it for framing, it's really easy to remove the tab, or as I more often do, loosen the screw and rotate it parallel to the beam where it's out of the way. Keeping it attached to the square assures I don't lose it. This is a dirt cheap mod that most of us can do with scrap, and with a tiny amount of planning you can make sure the tab rotates out of the way without obscuring any important markings.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Love this idea! Thank you so much for sharing Charles. It’s comments like this that I really enjoy reading, thank you so much for sharing and watching!

  • @johneversole9328
    @johneversole9328 Год назад +5

    Another great video Bryan!! I'm not sure what I like most...the video content or the great job you do on editing!! Keep up the great work!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Thanks so much John! I really appreciate that and I appreciate you watching. My last few videos will not have as much editing becuase of a vacation I went on but it will be coming back when I return! :)

  • @dfb_guitars
    @dfb_guitars Год назад +2

    I have several Woodpecker tools, and what you say about them is absolutely correct. I started my career as a drafter and was taught to no use a ruler or scale to draw straight lines, haha. I only use the WP rules for measuring. The center is great. I got a slide stop to make repetitive marks and is great for that. A word of caution to drywall T-squares. Check their accuracy. I have had a couple from a box store that were out of 90°. They get banged around easily in the store. I wish I saw your video on the aluminum square. Quality is great, and great for making 90° marks, but it's kind of limited vs. the SS one with marking holes.
    My favorite WP tool is definitely the Delve Square. The little 4" one. Although the holes are a 0.5mm lead buster, I use that gently. I replaced most of the trim in my old house and the Delve is great for that 1/4" reveal when nailing it up. It's trim, not fine furniture. Thanks for an entertaining and educational video Flynndogg! My first one of yours - subscribed!
    -Dave

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      This is awesome stuff Seamdye! Thank you so much for sharing. Great point on buying the drywall T-squares. I came really close to getting one a few months ago, and noticed it was bent before I bought it thank goodness! Love the delve square as well, 4'' is probably the only one I use out of the two I have. Thank you so much for subbing! :)

  • @jbratt
    @jbratt Год назад +2

    I bought my first woodpecker tool very recently. I just bought more and they are on the way. I also have a few Starrett tools that are over 100 years old. I think the woodpecker tools will still be used 100 years from now too.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      That is awesome on the Starrett tools. I love seeing old tools like that still being the workhorses of the shop! Thanks for sharing and I suspect those starretts will be around for another 100 years! :)

  • @mikec2810
    @mikec2810 Год назад +3

    Great video Bryan! Thanks for showing us some very useful tools for a decent price!

  • @jimrosson6702
    @jimrosson6702 Год назад +1

    Another great video Bryan great tips for us people that can’t afford WOODPECKER TOOLS THEY LOOK AMAZING but can’t afford them so I will definitely look into your other suggestions thanks for sharing

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Awesome, thank you so much for watching Jim! I truly appreciate it!

  • @patcross5799
    @patcross5799 Год назад

    Another fun Saturday video again, and as usual, you are feeding my inner need to buy stuff.

  • @eyecandy-gaming
    @eyecandy-gaming Год назад +4

    I use the delve sq all the time so for me it was worth the price. I like the weight of it and its features. However I also see the value of the cheap sq to keep with the miter saw because it tends to fall on the floor sometimes.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I think I've seen a mini delve square which would be nice to have. I think it is one of those tools they release every once in a while, I'll probably pick one up next time I see one! :) Thanks for watching eyecandy-gaming!

  • @kalania14
    @kalania14 11 месяцев назад

    Great video and valuable information...need to get one of those Swanson Framing Wizards

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      Thanks so much Kalania! I appreciate that and thanks for watching! The framing wizard is great. One of my favorite framing squares I have!

  • @timothyeldridge6822
    @timothyeldridge6822 Год назад +1

    I enjoyed this video! Thank you for sharing!

  • @ScholteimReinbachIII
    @ScholteimReinbachIII Год назад +3

    Great video. The combination square is probably the single most important tool for me. I agree with comments on the Drywall square being used for breaking down sheet goods. I think woodpeckers is really a luxury enthusiast brand like Festool is. But unlike Festool, I it's best to pick one or two tools from them that have the "package" of functionalities you use most often instead of seeing Woodpeckers as an ecosystem.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Oh man, you are so correct! The combination square was probably my second square ever, right after my framing square (that was a bad choice for my first square). I still use that combination square on almost every project at is is one of the most versatile. It's a swanson and I haven't seen a need to upgrade it at all since I got it. It works perfectly! Thank you so much for sharing and watching ScholteimReinbach!!!

  • @matthewnyden1236
    @matthewnyden1236 8 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for this video. I'm looking for a less expensive alternative to Woodpecker. I would have appreciated a discussion on how accurate the alternative brands are compared to Woodpecker.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  8 месяцев назад +1

      There are a lot of great brands out there. Check out woodraphic, igaging, goingmake, dfm all great brands I've dove into.

  • @bernitup6492
    @bernitup6492 5 месяцев назад

    Thanks for the video. As someone who was seriously frustrated with trying to square my miter saw and having nothing by duds from the brands you mention on this video, I just plunked down some money to get the precision triangle set from WP. Hope this reduces my frustration with getting my miter saw square to 90.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  5 месяцев назад

      Thanks for sharing and watching bernitup! Really appreciate it. Glad you have something that works now.

  • @williamfitzer4805
    @williamfitzer4805 Год назад

    I only have the delve squares, but since I do not have set up blocks, I do use the stepped base feature for height adjustments.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Good to know William! I suppose if you didn't have the setup blocks this would be an excellent solution! Love hearing everyone's experience on this!

  • @LesterSussman
    @LesterSussman 10 месяцев назад

    Very helpful to those of us on a budget.

  • @douglasanderson7260
    @douglasanderson7260 Год назад +2

    Good video.
    I like the Igaging Square, mostly because of the base having a 3/8 inch, and I think a 1/4 inch overlap, so marking the center of a board is much easier. For Eg, when doing layouts for mortises. They do cost a bit more than a speed square, but they also have the holes for measuring.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Thanks so much for sharing douglas! A lot of people mentioning iguaging from this video. Sounds like another excellent option. Sounds like I need to look into this brand! Thanks for sharing! :)

  • @justinkayce9811
    @justinkayce9811 Год назад +2

    I use my woodpeckers squares to check to see if other squares are actually square 😂 the tolerances over length also seem to give them an edge over others I’ve used. That said, that level of accuracy is usually more than your average Joe is looking for, and most usually go for machinist tools at that point.
    My fav woodpeckers tool is their 4” saddle square. It sees almost daily use. There are alternatives for this tool as well.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one that does that! :) I agree, the tolerances over length is one of the best features with woodpeckers. That is why my TS32 is one of my favorite one of theirs. It's funny you say that, I've been wanting a saddle square, and I've looked at the 4'' one a couple of times. Seems like that would be just about the perfect length and small enough to not be in the way. Thanks so much for sharing your experience and thanks for watching Justin!

  • @fancyhoundwoodworks9739
    @fancyhoundwoodworks9739 Год назад +6

    Thank you for confirming what I already knew, these are grossly over-priced. They're like a male version of a Louis Vuitton handbag. You want people to think you got it like that. This isn't coming from a place of bitterness either, I could afford them if I want. I just see zero value in them. DFM makes great squares as well, in the USA. Half the price. I mean no offense but I can't believe you spent $55 or so on 2 metal rulers. Boggles my mind. To each their own, and on a positive note. Great video. Informative, I enjoyed it. Liked and subscribed.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      DFM is a one that I’ve been wanting to check out! I know 731 woodworks talks about those quite a bit and they look nice. Love the analogy to LV handbag! Made me laugh but that hits the nail on the head!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      @@path4061 Awesome! Thank you so much for sharing. I'm thinking I need to check out DFM next time I'm in the market for a square. Sounds like high quality tools for the price!

  • @Dickie2702
    @Dickie2702 Год назад +1

    Here is what i used in my whole career as a cabinet maker. First up one good quality you say machinist we say engineers square, this only got used to check my working tools their accuracy makes woodworking tools look rubbish by comparison. Two combination squares, one 300mm, one 150mm. A sliding bevel and a setting guage. Several tee squares all made in the shop. Steel rulers in lengths from 150mm to a metre. If I needed anything else i made it myself. I still have the first tee square i made as an apprentice nearly 50 years ago.
    I dont agree with everything you say but you made a great point about the 'red tools'. Every woodworking channel has them and they sure as hell didnt pay for them and hey it worked because you watched all these people and thought i need all this stuff and now you realise you dont. You should pack up all the stuff you dont need and send it back to them with a note saying refund please no longer required to get the job done! They are over priced junk in most cases and certainly not essential to any woodworker.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I love this comment! So awesome to hear someone who does this for a living comment on what they actually use. Thanks for that. I’m actually getting ready to redo my shop and I’m taking a serious look at what I actually use and just have because I thought I would use it. I will be doing some “fall” cleaning! Love this and thanks again!

  • @t.e.1189
    @t.e.1189 4 месяца назад

    Great video. I have Fastcap's Blue Dog Square. It has an ingenious design that I have not seen elsewhere. It usually goes for about $50. But I just checked today on Fastcaps own site it is now listed as $25.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  4 месяца назад

      Oh nice! Thanks so much for sharing T.e.1189! I have not taken a look at that square but I've never been disappointed with any fastcap tools. Great company with high quality items. Thanks so much for commenting and watching! Really appreciate it!

  • @bobicard2503
    @bobicard2503 8 месяцев назад

    Good video, but I could not find the link you mentioned to the 15 uses of the speed square...

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  8 месяцев назад

      Oh man, I bet I forgot to add it Bobicard. Here is the link: ruclips.net/video/kVuHLtNng_s/видео.html
      Thanks so much for watching!

    • @bobicard2503
      @bobicard2503 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork Got it now, thanks!

  • @AxGryndr
    @AxGryndr Год назад +1

    If you want something closer to Delve square, DFM makes a great alternative. A good alternative to the T-Square would be to pick up a carpenter square fence from someone like TayTools or Lee Valley. The fence then would turn your carpenter square into the perfect alternative to the larger aluminum squares with the the lip and the T-square. A different alternative to the T-square would be a drafting but you run into the issue that it does not have the lip like the Woodpecker version.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Excellent Points AxGryndr! I've been wanting to pick up one of those from Taytools for a bit now. The last couple of times I've looked they have been sold out. I need to check them out again to see if they are in stock again. Excellent point with the DFM as well. I have yet to buy any DFM tools other than a card scraper, but I've heard great things about that brand and I need to check them out. Thanks so much for sharing and watching!

  • @hansangb
    @hansangb Год назад

    I don't use the paolini square for scribing. IT's too wobbly. But I love the size form factor. And use it almost exclusively to transfer measurements.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I would agree with you hansangb! Thanks so much for sharing and watching I really appreciate it!

  • @stevengreen4316
    @stevengreen4316 Год назад +1

    Hi Bryan. Im from UK. A popular site many use is Bangood. It is in the states has ive seen the odd video or two. Although Chinese knock offs you wouldnt believe quality. Companys such as Veiko, Hongdui, Wnew and a few more will soon be made aware of. My mitre gauge from Hongdui (£107)is exceptional. For measuring i use Veiko. I have a 12" (£26) square that surprisingly is. There is a guy from states who made vid about mitre gauge and Bangood items. Just have a look you will be pleasently surprised. Enjoying your vids.

    • @moldyzucchinis3251
      @moldyzucchinis3251 Год назад +1

      hookedonwood put me on the china tools, some of them are insane value

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Awesome! I've heard of bangood, but I haven't actually purchased anything from there yet. I think this would be an excellent idea to check out some of the tools available on that site as well. Thank you so much for sharing your experiences with it. I think that would make an excellent video in the future. Thanks so much for sharing Steven!

    • @stevengreen4316
      @stevengreen4316 Год назад +1

      Yes, Dennis is doing too bad. Like his new work shop

    • @stevengreen4316
      @stevengreen4316 Год назад

      Bryan, the only problem is shipping time. Usually 3 weeks. Good luck mate.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      @@stevengreen4316 awesome!

  • @KE4YAL
    @KE4YAL Год назад

    Great video thanks for saying what’s needed to be said for a long time Woodpecker is great just to pricey
    Thanks

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I appreciate that KE4YAL! Thank you so much for watching!

  • @yellowdog2181
    @yellowdog2181 Год назад +1

    As a professional woodworker since I was about 18 now about 30 years in , I’ve owned every brand of everything over the years. But in my shop when it comes to measuring and layout we only use Woodpeckers and Starett . I don’t watch many ww videos but there seems to be more and more videos on bashing quality expensive tools. There’s a big difference between a professional and a weekend warrior. As a guy who produces a quality product I for one have no problem spending money on another guy producing a quality product especially in the US

    • @Lifelesslion21
      @Lifelesslion21 Год назад

      I don't see him bashing woodpeckers but his video does point out that if you're trying to save some money when starting out there are cheaper alternatives.

    • @yellowdog2181
      @yellowdog2181 Год назад

      @@Lifelesslion21 no you’re right, the thumbnail bugged me a bit, I probably should’ve said nothing

    • @Lifelesslion21
      @Lifelesslion21 Год назад

      @@yellowdog2181 I mean it's youtube, you're welcome to say whatever you want, but as a weekend warrior I'm always looking to save where I can as I'm barely starting out.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      THanks for watching Yellowdog. Just to be clear, I wasn't bashing by any means. I love the woodpeckers brand and the quality of the product. I just wanted to show economy alternatives in this video. I've never had starret, but I've heard nothing but good things about that brand as well. I do think that you can get the same quality from cheaper brands. But with brands like woodpeckers and starett you know what you are getting. Thanks so much for commenting and thanks for watching!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Yes! That's exactly what I was trying to do thank you lifelesslion. I wouldn't own the ones I did if I didn't think they were good tools. Thanks for watching!

  • @JVBL1
    @JVBL1 Год назад

    Thanks for introducing me to Woodpeckers. What about the empire t square?

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Great question JVBL1! I don't have any experience with the Empire T square but would love to check them out. I'm guessing its a reasonable solution as well! Thank you so much for watching!

  • @simplyphil.photography164
    @simplyphil.photography164 Год назад

    I've just brought the Preciva folding tringle ruler ( carpenters sqaure ) and l like it, one of your reccomended items l believe, thanks

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      That's awesome Phil! I hope it works well for you! Thanks so much for sharing and watching! :)

  • @happymonkey7695
    @happymonkey7695 Год назад

    I really appreciate this type of video. I would like to own Woodpecker tools and have almost started the investment journey. But the cost! I just cannot justify spending that kind of money no matter if I can afford to pay or not. Having alternatives from you I fully believe are honest opinions. On a side note, this video had the best collection of inserted clips that introduce, support, ridicule or make fun of a word or phrase. Keep up the excellent content along with the entertainment.

    • @Dickie2702
      @Dickie2702 Год назад

      Trust me I made my living as a cabinet maker and if i started my 50 year journey again today............... I wouldn't take a single Woodpeckers tool along for the ride.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Thanks so much happy monkey! I appreciate that and I agree with you. I have felt buyers regret every time I’ve I’ve purchased a woodpeckers tool. And that is not normal. Luckily they have all worked as advertised, but buyers regret should come from buying cars not squares!

  • @Buffy1967
    @Buffy1967 Год назад +1

    Now I want to name my little woodshop, whiskey butterfly 😅 ! Great alternatives to choose from besides woodpeckers products. Loved the video

  • @johnjones6077
    @johnjones6077 Год назад +1

    You are absolutely right with the alternatives. Woodpeckers is not trying to reinvent the wheel. The extra features are nice but you buy woodpeckers tools for their accuracy. That’s why they’re expensive, everybody knows this. You are not getting 0.001” squareness over 12” with Swanson or empire. I don’t own any woodpeckers tools but I would 100% like to get the 1281. Having a square that I know is square and Carrie’s a life time warranty is well worth its price. I’ve already in my short life have spent way more on cheap squares that I coulda bought some woodpecker tools and I’m a fool for doing so.

    • @rogerhodges7656
      @rogerhodges7656 Год назад

      I don't know anyone doing, or any application in woodworking that needs 0.001" accuracy in woodworking.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      That's pretty precise, that's for darn sure! :)

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      You are correct John, that is what you get with woodpeckers and I think that is why they can justify the high price tag. You will never have to worry about how precise those tools are, but you are going to pay for it. At lease with woodpeckers you can't blame the tools for measurment errors :)

  • @thomasgilbert9347
    @thomasgilbert9347 Год назад

    Thanks for all the information

  • @kevinstefano8654
    @kevinstefano8654 Год назад

    One thing that I'd like u to comment on is the precision and consistency of the measurements. That is one of the big selling points for Woodpeckers. Are the measurements accurate in the cheaper alternatives (when compared to Woodpeckers)? Thank so much.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Excellent idea! Might be with a follow up video on this. I will need a little more time to work with the brands like woodraphic to give an opinion but what I’ve seen so far has been impressive. Thanks for the comment it’s a good one!

  • @NathanTalbertWoodworking
    @NathanTalbertWoodworking Год назад

    somehow, I had never seen that challenger commercial before. I had to figure out what it was and it was great.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      I know right? I hadn't either. Pretty funny! Especially old George cruising around!

  • @Zamboni-0805
    @Zamboni-0805 Год назад +3

    I am not a Woodworker fan, but when it comes to a tri-square I only use a Starrett Combination Square. The Swanson, Empire or the Wood rafic dosen't even come close to the quality and accuracy of the Starrett.

    • @Dickie2702
      @Dickie2702 Год назад

      Starrett make good tools but they are very expensive. More people who don't have your budget should know any combination square can be tuned with a file or even sandpaper to be dead on accurate. I'd suggest this is an important skill to learn as one day you will drop your Starrett and it will need some love.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Awesome, and thanks for sharing dickie! I wish I had some starret tools as well. Don't really need them at this point, but If I every want to replace my combination square that is the brand i will be looking at first. Thanks for sharing and thanks for watching!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Good to hear zamboni! I'm sure the quality of starrett is the best (probably even better than woodpeckers). I will be looking at their combination square if I decide to ever upgrade mine! Thanks so much for watching!

  • @RicPAGE-ub4ck
    @RicPAGE-ub4ck 4 месяца назад

    Great conversation thanks

  • @jodymontez693
    @jodymontez693 10 месяцев назад

    I have a woodraphic and love it 😊 and a paolini😮

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  10 месяцев назад

      Me as well! If you haven't checked out there 4" square it's worth a look probably my favorite one so far, Thank you so much for watching Jody!

  • @trentthompson2928
    @trentthompson2928 Год назад

    Awesome job!!! I keep thinking that my first woodpecker might be a Pocket T-square( most affordable for me) Thoughts? Any cheaper alternatives?

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I think that is a great choice. especially if you are going to be using it for layout lines. Incra also makes some very affordable versions as well, so might be worth checking those out too. The T-square won't be able to check for square if you are building things like cabinets, but I think that would be an excellent choice. (I got the 642 which would also be an excellent choice in my opinion!)

    • @DjLooN
      @DjLooN Год назад

      If you don't mind buying knockoffs 731 woodworks did a nice comparison to woodpeckers tools showing which ones were good to buy

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      @@DjLooN Oh yeah! I think I saw that one. With the Paolini Pocket rules on the thumbnails. I think his video actually inspired me a bit to do this one!

  • @heruvey87
    @heruvey87 Год назад

    The pocket rule is my favorite out all of them because it fits in your pocket or your holdsters, the knock offs have a thick ruler and i regret getting them

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      That's great to hear heruvey. For some reason I just can't get over the stability issue with it. But for smaller measurements and laying out things like dovetails, or mortise and tenons I'm sure it is just fine. Thanks for sharing your experience and thanks for watching!

  • @cletusrobinson
    @cletusrobinson Год назад

    Love the shirt!

  • @ibtarnine
    @ibtarnine Год назад

    I have a Swanson combination square. Unfortunately it was not perfectly square when I received it, but it's easy to adjust with a file. I see no reason to spend over $100 on a combination square when it's going to come out of square with general use, and you're going to have to learn how to square it on your own anyway. I also got a Swanson speed square with the combination square, the same as in your video, and it's actually square, so no complaints there. Both are a great value and there isn't a lot of worry with damaging them due to their cost.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Excellent to hear ibtamine! Love the swanson brand and there is a reason they have been around for so long. Some of the best value you can get for your money. That is all I used when I first started woodworking and I continue to use them today. Thank you so much for sharing and thanks for watching!

  • @36736fps
    @36736fps Год назад

    I attach a lip to my framing square with a spring clamp - no droop and costs zero.
    I do not scribe lines with a square of any kind. I just mark the distance twice and use a straight edge to scribe the line. The advantage of doing it this way is I do not need a perfectly straight and smooth edge to obtain a straight scribe line.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Love that idea! Thank you so much for sharing the spring clamp idea! Love hearing ideas like this!

  • @unclepewter4161
    @unclepewter4161 9 месяцев назад

    For finding the center of a board just angle the ruler to a point divisible by 2 or however many segments you need. For instance if you have a 7 inch board and want to find the center place your ruler so that zero is at one edge and 10 inches is at the other edge and mark at 5 inches, that’s your center

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  9 месяцев назад

      That's an excellent way to do it! Thanks so much for sharing with everyone and watching unclepewter!

  • @robertlevine2152
    @robertlevine2152 Год назад +1

    A plain Drafting T-Square works well. They come in all sorts of styles, and they are reasonably priced.
    If you want to find a center or divide up something into equal parts all you need is an accurate rule and a straight edge.
    To find the center lay the rule on an angle across your piece of wood. Adjust the rule so that it sits with whole numbers easily divided by two rest on each edge. Say you have a piece of wood that is 3-11/16" wide and you want to find the center. Place the 1" mark on one side and then the 5" mark on the other, so you have 4" of rule lying across the wood. 4"/2=2", 2"+1"=3" now place a mark at 3" and you have the center. Do this again further down your piece of wood. Draw a line between your two points and you have a centerline. If you want to divide a piece of wood into thirds set the scale at 1" and 7: along the edges. 7"-1"=6", 6"/3"=2". Place marks at 3" (1"+2") and 5" (1"+4"). You now have divided the piece of wood into thirds.
    You find the center by drawing a line across your piece of wood square to the edge. Measure in a 1/4" from each side. Take a compass and open it so it is wider than your piece of wood. Strike two arcs, one from each 1/4" mark. Where the two arcs cross is the center.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I love this Robert! Thank you so much for sharing. I use a couple of your tips on a regular basis so it was good to get a refresher! I love comments like this that share experience and ideas. Thank you so much for sharing and watching!

    • @disqusrubbish5467
      @disqusrubbish5467 Год назад

      Good tip, and you can also buy a rule that has measurements from the center 0. Very fast for centering.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      @@disqusrubbish5467 Yes! Thank you again for sharing and watching! :)

  • @coreybeaty8528
    @coreybeaty8528 7 месяцев назад

    I think you could totally use the drywall square in place that T square just fine and they’re generally 48 inches long

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  7 месяцев назад

      You know that is a great point. I'd love to have one of those. I've seen them at the big box stores many times and almost pulled the trigger. A couple of other people have commented though that they can sometimes be a little off. Great idea and thanks for sharing and watching Corey!

  • @3dtexan890
    @3dtexan890 Год назад

    What is all the beeping out?

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Are you referring to the intro? He says the price is wrong b#$ch!

  • @Danko88
    @Danko88 Год назад +1

    the one woodpeckers tool I use for everything is the saddle square 4 inch in my apron. Used to use the Paolini Pocket 6 inch but since getting the saddle square I have not used. I like the saddle for being able to scribe a line on on both faces so when I do dados or groves I can setup easier. I bought a bunch of those Banggood veiko squares and others from veiko great tools.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Awesome Danko! Love hearing what tools others use on a daily basis. Sounds like you have an excellent setup that works well for you, which is all that counts. Thanks again for sharing!

  • @mak4374
    @mak4374 Год назад

    Thank you for showing alternatives to..."Jesus, reaaaaally, Woodpecker?!?", but really thank for showing the Dodge commercial!!! Perhaps, just perhaps, EVERYTHING "American" should be shown with that song as a background. Maybe it's just me, but...that was just the perfect soundtrack for your video...

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Haha! Thanks so much mak4374! I can’t believe I hadn’t seen that commercial before, truly funny! 😂

  • @Rodbuilder109
    @Rodbuilder109 2 месяца назад

    Check out the WEN measure/layout tools most are under $30

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  2 месяца назад

      It's funny you say that! I've been eyeing those the last couple of months and i've been thinking about doing a video on them. Thanks so much for the suggestion and thanks for watching Rod!

  • @bamsebrumbamsebrumen5403
    @bamsebrumbamsebrumen5403 Год назад +1

    All good points, but cheaper tools often gives more errors due to bad tolerances.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I'm 100% with you. I do think its a roll of the dice with some of these tools with complete precision and accuracy, but brands like woodraphic have really impressed me so far. You definately get what you pay for. I think the key is you need to test your measuring devices as soon as you get them. Are they square, do they line up with your tape measure etc. Great point bamsebrumbamsebrumen!

  • @randallthomas5207
    @randallthomas5207 Год назад

    I use Incra, and still prefer it over most anything else. Plywood I just use a tracksaw and get it a bit proud, and then finish on the table saw. My first “track saw” was a 1/2-inch HDPE plate, with the saw mounted on it, and a groove to follow the slot in some t-track. Relatively inexpensive, as I bought the plastic as an off cut at a commercial plastics supplier.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      You don't know how upset I am that I didn't mention incra in this video. You are 100% correct. An excellent product for the money. I have a couple of measing tools from them and they work excellently. Not sure why I didn't include them, Most likely it's because I have stored them somewhere that I can't get to right now. Thank you so much for the valuable reminder!

  • @creamysbrianna
    @creamysbrianna 11 месяцев назад

    @Flynndogg Woodwork
    It really boils down to what level of precision and accuracy you need. If you are doing fine woodworking and want to ensure you really are square you can't beat woodpecker precision of 0.001" per foot of holding square. The cheap cast speed squares can't hold that level of precision. You'd be lucky to hold .020" per foot of squareness. That adds up quickly as you increase your distance away from your edge.
    A great alternative to Woodpeckers with similar precision and accuracy would be igaging brand of precision tools. They hold approximately +/- .005" of squareness per foot for their equivalent Develve squares for a fraction of the price of woodpeckers.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      Great great point creamysbrianna! I agree with you, when I'm doing something with very high precision I almost always reach for my woodpeckers or woodraphic. I think the point of this video for me was to show some cheaper alternatives to those who maybe can't afford the higher end tools or are just starting out and are looking for some alternatives. Igauging is a brand i've been very interested in checking out over the last few months. I've heard some really good things about them. thanks for sharing i really appreciate it!

  • @deadbungeejumper
    @deadbungeejumper Год назад

    An inch, is not an inch, is not an inch. Straightness and square are not the only measures. Continuity between measuring devices is what led me to buy a FEW nicer measuring tools. It is crazy how much variance one can have between measuring devices. Nicer measuring devices are much more consistent.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Oh I agree with you. And sometimes it doesn't always have to do with the edge of the measuring devises. If you get a tool with a lip that has a bump in it or something like that I can also throw all your measurments off as well. Thanks for sharing and thanks for watching deadbungeejumper! Love the username!

  • @BobBob-eh5sb
    @BobBob-eh5sb 11 месяцев назад

    Hey, if you’re curious about Woodpeckers or any other expensive brand, but hate to waste good money, then save up, buy a small square or ruler or whatever and try it out. For myself, they’re not worth it, but then I don’t have money falling out of my pockets. If you don’t either, I would probably go to one of the big box stores or your local hardware store and check out their stuff. Squares are easy to check. Just grab one, set in on the shelf, mark a line, flip it over and check it. If it matches the line and isn’t flimsy, buy it. As far as tapes and rules, don’t switch between them during a job. Use the same one to mark for a cut as you did to measure for the piece. Doesn’t matter if it’s off a bit because everything will be off the same amount. I would rather spend more on my power tools. I don’t think it matters if your line is perfectly placed and square if you have a crap saw that you can’t keep on that line, or a drill press that wobbles.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      Great suggestions BobBob! Thank you so much for sharing. I did exactly what you suggested. Saved up for the 642. I ended up really liking it, but nothing quite stood out to me more than the original square. Other than maybe the t square. Great suggestions and thanks for watching!

    • @BobBob-eh5sb
      @BobBob-eh5sb 11 месяцев назад

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork Thanks for that. I’m sure Woodpeckers and the other top of the line products are pretty good, at least they better be. For someone running a woodworking business and especially with employees, they would want consistency throughout the shop. But for the hobbyist or a one man band woodworker trying to make a living or extra money, you got to watch the overhead. The tools have to pay for themselves. There are good quality squares and rules out there that don’t cost an arm and a leg. I think a triangle square is the way to go. With those if you find one that’s square and made with good thick metal, it will stay square. The T squares that are riveted together can get sprung or bent or the rivets get lose. And you don’t want to drop it on the floor and step on it or drop a 2x10 on it when it cost a couple hundred bucks. Again, save the money for a good table saw and get a good fence and miter gauge for it. The fences are usually decent with the higher dollar ones but the miter gauges tend to leave a lot to be desired. And give it a good tune up. Even the good ones may not be set up correctly right out of the box. Square the blade to the miter slots, align the fence to the blade, turn in the miter gauge. Might find out that it was the saw screwing up the cuts, not the measuring tools.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      @@BobBob-eh5sb great thoughts! I agree. I've been wanting to get one of those table saw gauges to check my blade for square etc. I think my fence is a little off too. All things I need to check and calibrate, hopefully sooner rather than later. Thanks again for your insite!

  • @contessa.adella
    @contessa.adella 3 месяца назад

    Nobody NEEDS Woodpeckers, but if like me you want at least one guaranteed accurate square in your collection a Woodpeckers square is a nice tool to have if you got some spare cash. I have the WP 1281 and don’t regret it. You CAN instead buy a good quality alternative for a fraction of the price and do the horizontal flip test to check for square, sending back any that fail. I bought a Presch 12” combination square and it was spot on, as good as my Woodpeckers square. I also bought a cheap’ish Chinese square from Amazon that was far from square. Don’t forget though, you can also make a true square of ANY size with some metal flat bar, old Pythagoras and some easy maths. Oh and NEVER drop any square..or it won’t be😊

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  3 месяца назад

      Totally agree contessa! One of my favorite brands that I've been using more and more is iGuaging. I did a video on them a few months back and I've been using their double square like crazy. Thanks so much for sharing and watcing, Really appreciate it!

  • @81Lord-Nikon
    @81Lord-Nikon Год назад

    I agree with everything you said in your video. If you can afford a WP tool, then go for it. But in the end, I think that the only reason WP is still around is their RUclips influencers. Are they rediculously accurate, yes they are. Do you need accuracy to .001? That is for you to decide. Just remember, it doesn't matter how accurate your measuring tools are if your cutting tools are not accurate. For me, I would spend my money on quality power/hand tools before I invested $300 in a square.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      100% agree with you! I find most of the time when I'm building something I can't even cut to the accuracy of woodpeckers. Then once you have a few pieces cut, you aren't using measuring tools a lot of the time anyway. You are using the piece you cut out already as the reference for measurments! Thanks for commenting and thanks for watching CalCity1000!

  • @billybike57
    @billybike57 6 месяцев назад

    Go get em Dogg!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  6 месяцев назад

      Haha! Thanks so much Billybike! I appreciate you watching!

  • @NateDizity1420
    @NateDizity1420 Год назад +1

    I have many of both Woodpeckers & Woodraphic tools and yes there both good tools but since Woodraphic tools cost almost as much as woodpeckers I'll just continue to buy American

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Valid point! Both are great. Thanks so much for watching!

  • @ctfleming85
    @ctfleming85 Год назад

    Do I see a garage sale on your woodpeckers tools in the near future?

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Haha! No sir! Still love them, but man are they pricey! :)

  • @stevevogt866
    @stevevogt866 Год назад

    I have the combination square It only has 1 nut to hold it 1 nut is not better than 2 nuts. That square is off by a degree given the length.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I agree it would be nice to have a second nut in the combination square. that seems to be one problem with the design of a combination square is the potential for the engagement between the screw and the ruler not being fully secured. Thanks for watching Steve!

  • @randyheinbaugh8238
    @randyheinbaugh8238 5 месяцев назад

    no matter how "accurate" the tool the real trick is aligning your eye to the mark and the blade

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  5 месяцев назад

      That is 100% correct. Paralax is a real problem. Thanks so much for watching and great point Randy!

  • @keithgutshall9559
    @keithgutshall9559 Год назад

    I have a small Swanson tri square,and it is not square 😢

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Ugh! That sucks. Can you return it? That is the first time I've heard someone getting an uncalibrated tool from them. I'm sure you could exchange it out for a new one!

  • @BlessedLaymanNC
    @BlessedLaymanNC 8 месяцев назад +1

    I'm not going to argue that Woodpecker isn't the best in accuracy. For sake of argument, I'll consider that nothing is as accurate, much less more accurate.
    But, when I see YT woodworkers using them when they are NOT being promoted by them, it shows me that they are full of themselves. Why?
    Every one of them makes mistakes and will be first to admit that the best woodworkers are best because they can "cover their mistakes". Even with these precise tools, they fail! Just like the rest of us and like every beginner, but maybe not to the scale a beginner's mistake.
    I don't think there are any NASA or Space-X engineers teaching us how to make the perfect table, cabinet, cutting board, etc on these wood-working channels.
    What I do see being taught are great woodworking skills on how to make repeatable cuts, get square angles and parallel sides. I've never seen someone tell me how to shave off or add 1/8 of an inch so my table top is perfectly square. Instead, they say things, and I'll quote ":Ted Baldwin" from Gwinnett Woodworker's Guild, "If it looks square, it is square."
    Wood shrinks, swells and bows more than the precision of these tools on a daily basis in most shops!
    The first rule my hobby woodworking friends taught me about woodworking is "use the same tape measure for all measurements." The next rule I learned is from You Tubers, "to fit the piece, creep up on the cut." The third thing is make sure your square is square.
    As long as your square is square, even with the most inaccurate tape measure, you can build a square box and fit it into a precision hole just as well as you can using the Woodpecker. Convince me that I am wrong!
    The most accurate I can build anything is determined, not by the accuracy of my tape, but how accurately I can cut, shape or connect pieces.
    If you want to see how to build projects without any ruler at all, check out Ted Baldwin at Gwinnett Woodworkers on RUclips. His videos are 5-10 years old, and he doesn't know I exist, but every beginner needs to at least watch his two safety videos.
    As you learned, Woodpecker tools may have their place, but that isn't in the hands of beginners. If anything, that much precision will be detrimental to the confidence of beginners. They need practice, not precision!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  8 месяцев назад

      Thank you so much for your insight! The tools are only as accurate as the user, that is for sure! :) Thanks so much for sharing and watching!

  • @ВикторБересток-у3х

    Спасибо за отличный видео обзор.

  • @robv.7864
    @robv.7864 Год назад

    I get it. It is those guys job to sell tools. But really, 90 % is superfluous. I think the true tradesmark of a good woodworker is doing more with less, not doing more with more and more gadgets. I have a Starret that is expensive and accurate and that is really all I need.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Love it and I agree. Tools are only tools and only a bridge to get you where you need to go. Great choice with the starrett! THank you so much for your comment and thanks for watching Robv!

  • @Markevans36301
    @Markevans36301 11 месяцев назад

    Can I live without this or that Woodpecker, that's not the question. The question is does this do something that makes it worth the crazy price? Everyone develops a didifferent workflow so the answer is never the same for two people. For me the only one that I can't live without is the 3-1/2" DeLVe. Doing layup on small stock it just has no substitute.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      Great point Mark! I 100% agree. The 642 is one that i have relied upon for years, Just recently got replaced with a woodraphic M4 which is only 4 inches long. Like it because of its size. Thanks so much for sharing and watching, excellent points!

  • @madsighntist14
    @madsighntist14 Год назад +1

    Right off the bat: 40 years ago, I used a crabide drill, to put a pencil hole Exactly ONE INCH FROM THE END tHE 1" END AS IT MAY BE!
    I made it to fit the Pentel P209 A .9MM LEADD\.
    As a custom wood worker, I used the P209 exclusivle. Cut to left, or right, leave the line take the line.
    Great combination square trick.
    philip
    In the Great Pacific NorthWET, Oregon Division

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      What a great idea madighntist! Thank you so much for sharing that. Excellent idea. Tell Mr Squatch I say hi! :)

  • @MakeitZUPER
    @MakeitZUPER Год назад

    There's always a cheaper alternative to precision tools, lol. It's the precision that costs so much though. US made also ads a lot too. If I were still doing machinist work, I would definitely buy the Woodpecker brands. Using a scale as a straight edge? Yeah, that's definitely the wrong tool for the task, regardless of the price. They look very well made and if you don't want them, I can put them to a more effective and appropriate use. I really like the red anodized finish too.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Yep! They are excellent tools! My 642 is my right hand man in the shop. Thanks so much for the comment and thanks for watching!

  • @Kunfucious577
    @Kunfucious577 Год назад

    I really don’t understand the crazy prices on a bunch of rulers. However, that goes for a lot of wood working tools. There are a bunch that aren’t really necessary.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I agree with you! I'm sure that many of the tools are expensive to make, especially ones with precision like rulers, but they still seem unfairly priced.

  • @angusmclean4783
    @angusmclean4783 Год назад

    Please don't hate me, but the only "precision" you need with wood work is "square / angle". Length accuracy is pretty much immatreial (within reason). The dimensions of our work changes by variations in temperature / humidity / time so as to make the famed accuracy of the W'Pecker imaterial.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I like your thought process and I think it has some real validity. Even all the miters, etc. are going to move with the changing of humidity and temperature. Thanks so much for sharing, you got me thinking (which is rare!) :)

  • @KrazeeG
    @KrazeeG Год назад

    It's all relative. Yes I'm a WP guy. You can always find less expensive tools that work. I live in a nice house and drive nice cars...
    Again it's all relative.😊

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I agree with you Glen, I'm a woodpeckers guy too, but I like to show what can used as alternatives if you can't afford the tools. Thanks so much for watching! :)

  • @agentchodybanks9120
    @agentchodybanks9120 Год назад

    The Woodraphic square has a thin aluminum rule which can be damaged extremely easily when compared to the steel Woodpeckers

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Yes that is very true, but woodpeckers also has an aluminum version which also has the same problem. Don't ask me how I know! :( Still much much cheaper than the woodpeckers aluminum version as well, but very valid point! Thank you so much for sharing!

  • @moldyzucchinis3251
    @moldyzucchinis3251 Год назад

    just use the power of the mind to check squareness and draw straight lines

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Haha! Is that like the force? 😂. Thanks for watching moldy!

  • @themeat5053
    @themeat5053 Год назад

    Dogg, man...ads? WTF? You big time now!! What you talking 'bout ....not "Woodpeckers?" You're dissing "Paolini? I'm aghast! Dogg, man, we counted 26 times you said, "Woodpeckers." That was a lot of push-ups. So many, in fact, that we had to drop the number of repetitions to 50 per and then you hit us with four mentions of the "Paolini," name dropped Swanson, Empire, DelVe square, Power tech, Wood graphic...holy cow. Plus, you got us with your "lips" and "lead." Good thing we have another month, or so of beach weather. BTW, was that you dad? Love ya, big guy. Keep up the good work.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Haha! Yes! That was my dad :). This was a big name dropper of a video! But all for the good health and well being of the meat! I’m running out of lips jokes may need some help for the next video! 😂

    • @themeat5053
      @themeat5053 Год назад

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork I think it's primo that you include your dad. I lost mine when I was too young and I missed having him around to keep me straight. I admire that you show him respect.
      Drive on, my brother.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      @@themeat5053 Thanks so much Meat - Yeah, I lost my mom and dad and sister when I was about 29. Luckily my wife's family absorbed me into theirs. But its tough, missed out on a lot of years with them, and not a day goes by where they aren't thought of. Sorry to hear about your dad, I'm sure he would be proud!

  • @rollingstone3017
    @rollingstone3017 Год назад

    😂Morning Wood. Gotta get that t/shirt.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Haha! One of my favorites too! Thanks for watching Rollingstone!

  • @CoquiAudio
    @CoquiAudio Год назад

    I sub because he has a weird scene of humor 😂

  • @MrRackinroll
    @MrRackinroll Год назад

    I have been wood working for a long long time and never felt the need to use 1/8" hole feature. I could give you 10 reason why that feature isn't necessarly that impor tant. The video was good , but for me a woodworker tool would never darken the door of my shop. They ain't wort h the money. measure twice cut once, it works every time.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Love it. And advice that has stood the test of time. Thanks for watching MrRackinRoll! :)

  • @steelsunpi
    @steelsunpi Год назад

    Gotta remember that speedsquares are made for rough construction and may not be true (i.e. 88 degrees instead of 90).

    • @bradysstewart
      @bradysstewart Год назад

      You can verify how square it is by using a scrap piece of wood with parallel sides. Hold the lip edge against one known parallel side and draw a full line. flip to the opposite side and draw another full line. if your lines cross youre not square.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Excellent point brady! Thanks for sharing with everyone! :)

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Great point Steelsumpi! Thank you for sharing!

  • @BobBob-eh5sb
    @BobBob-eh5sb Год назад

    No you don’t need fancy, expensive tools. Sure they look cool, but how much precision do you really need? If you don’t have accuracy in you cuts, drilled holes and assembly, then it doesn’t matter how accurate the line or measurement was. These are like the 5 step procedure to square up your miter gauge or crosscut sled. Sure it’s nice to get it as perfect as possible, but to strive for .001 of an inch. Look at ruler with 1/64” increments. Pretty small. If you can get the saw to that in say 12 inches, then that’s 1/8” in 8 feet, which you can’t even cut with a miter gauge or crosscut sled. As far as squares, hold it on a straight edged board or workbench, strike a line, flip it 180 degrees and see if it is still on the line. I do that at the store. Use the shelf or a counter top or whatever you can find that’s straight.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Excellent way to look at it Bob. Clear and easy to understand! Thank you so much for posting this and thanks for sharing with everyone!

    • @BobBob-eh5sb
      @BobBob-eh5sb 11 месяцев назад

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork Thank you for the comment.

  • @fraserhardmetal7143
    @fraserhardmetal7143 Год назад

    Seems to me that most of these RUclipsrs just collect expensive tooling to "flex", as you say.
    They seem to create very little with them - the Snap-on con is just the same.
    Just checking out my latest Festool addition..........

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Haha! I agree with you. It seems those fancy names seem to get more views. My channel is slowing migrating from tool reviews to more builds in the very near future. But I agree with you! :)

  • @terrydanks
    @terrydanks 11 месяцев назад

    Woodpeckers is "jewelry for woodworkers." Absolutely unnecessary! But beautiful.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      I love that saying! Jewelry for woodworkers, that’s excellent! Thanks for watching Terry!

  • @garrett798
    @garrett798 9 месяцев назад

    Give me Starrett over these cheap woodpeckers any day.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  9 месяцев назад

      Haha! I don't disagree! Garrett for the Starrett! :) Thanks for watching!

  • @Peter_Cetera
    @Peter_Cetera Год назад

    Woodpeckers tools are just a status symbol...

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Well, they are certainly expansive. They are completely accurate, but that the entire reason why I wanted to make this video. They aren’t the only tool that is accurate. Thanks for sharing and thanks for watching Peter!

  • @lefty1024
    @lefty1024 2 месяца назад

    I just returned a TS24 T-square to them after the first time they told me they would repair or replace. They did neither. They sent me back mine as if I wouldn’t CHECK it. I’m done with their ass!

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  2 месяца назад

      Oof! That sucks. Sounds like their customer service may not be as good as they claim. Probably a good idea that you returned it. Check out the goingmake t-squares. I think they are just as good and about 1/3 the price.

  • @cybercapri
    @cybercapri Год назад

    Great video, very informative, thanks for sharing... I agree 100% that Woodpecker Tools are just way too expensive for what they are and there are way too many alternatives that are almost as good @ a fraction of the price. Agreed, not bashing Woodpecker but you can't say the truth without it sounding like we are bashing Woodpecker. What Woodpecker needs to realize is "when an item is priced right, it SELLS..." and given that their cheapest tool is easily over 100 USD that's not good for the average Joe. Your Amazon links eventually landed me with the Milescraft Brand and I'm here to say they are very reasonably priced. I almost bought a few tools just now because of the price alone; not that I'd EVER use these tools they were just priced that reasonably that I WANTED TO BUY THEM... Milescraft has a drill guide from 1/8th to 1/2" for under 7 USD, Amazon Prime Shipping of 1 to 2 days, and it had brass inserts, I mean, seriously how reasonably priced is THAT??? Milescraft offers a plethora of tool options with many that will rival Woodpecker; and even if they're not as good, the price is right and makes it worth investing in... Cheer's...

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Love milescraft. I have not been disappointed from a single item I have purchased from them yet. They seem to take ideas and make them more affordable with the same functionality! Thanks for watching and the comment!

  • @simplyphil.photography164
    @simplyphil.photography164 Год назад

    Must add the price-£25.99 UK-

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Thanks so much for sharing Phil! Very helpful for our UK friends!

  • @KDD0063
    @KDD0063 5 месяцев назад

    The problem with a square is every time I buy one I find out it is not square

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  5 месяцев назад +1

      You should check out the sort I just did on how to square an unsquare square. I came out last week! Thanks so much for watching KDD0063!

  • @petemahler4784
    @petemahler4784 Год назад

    Nothing bets a Machinist square.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      I know right, most people bet with money, :) but yes I agree those things are dead accurate and cheap! Thanks so much for watching and commenting Pete!

  • @robv.7864
    @robv.7864 Год назад

    If I got a dollar for every time a manufacturer said "this will revolutionalize your woodworking "I would be rich. It is just bs.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Haha! You should check out the woodpeckers videos on their site. It's hard to revolutionize a craft that is so old. I think three of the tools that I have seen that have really "revolutionized" my shop are the sawstop, the nova voyager, and the shaper origin. But I totally get it! :)

  • @surfdogvacationrentals5207
    @surfdogvacationrentals5207 11 месяцев назад

    Whiskey Butterfly 😅😅😅😅

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  11 месяцев назад

      Haha! I wasn't sure too many people would catch that! :) Thanks for watching surfdogvacationrentals!

  • @tpaulsmith7194
    @tpaulsmith7194 Год назад +1

    It’s hip to be square

  • @an-droid8095
    @an-droid8095 Год назад

    obviously, the Woodpeckers scheme needs some bashing

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Haha! I feel like everyone is up woodpecker's you know what, they are great tools, but I do think they are charging too much for them! Thanks so much for watching an-droid8095!

  • @st0mper121
    @st0mper121 Год назад +16

    When i see woodpecker tools in a shop. and this includes youtube video inside a shop. If anyone thinks that a 150$ square is worth it. over a 20$ accurate square. i dont need to follow any kind of recommendations from that person or shop. they have no understanding of value for money.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      Well I think different people have different budgets for things that are important to them and they wish to spend their money of different things, but your point is received! Thanks for watching!

    • @st0mper121
      @st0mper121 Год назад

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork If you can afford to make that mistake i guess go for it? personally i think getting a CNC and making your own tool is a much better way to go. granted i do have little over 3,000 invested but i make much more then squares....

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад +1

      @@st0mper121 I hear you. $3000 is enough to make an awesome shop that is for sure! I love the idea of making your own tools. I'd love to do some videos on that. I actually recently bought a book about that same topic!

    • @st0mper121
      @st0mper121 Год назад

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork I started off with a OnefinityCNC If your thinking of this route. Might want to check them out. the new ones have some really nice controller upgrades.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      @@st0mper121 It's funny you mention that. That was one of the brands on the top of my list. I'm temporarily holding off on buying a cnc for a bit though as I'm getting my workshop insulated/heated and cooled so my budget for woodworking is spent for a bit! :( Great suggestion though!

  • @raymondcassar2251
    @raymondcassar2251 Год назад

    Good job debunking the need to spend a fortune on woodpecker tools I order to build beautiful projects.

  • @andrewpinson1268
    @andrewpinson1268 Год назад

    You cannot put a price on pointing to all of your Woodpecker tools on the wall and saying with pride "and there is my Woodpecker tools". Just not the same pointing to the wall where you have yellow, red, white, blue and black tools that do the same thing for a quarter of the price. What are you going to do start naming twenty different brands. Not the same.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      Not sure I fully understand but thank you for watching Andrew!

    • @andrewpinson1268
      @andrewpinson1268 Год назад

      @@FlynndoggWoodwork As I get older, my attempts of humor fall like a rock.

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  Год назад

      @@andrewpinson1268 I think we need a grandpa joke category for the old timers, even worse than the dad joke category! :)

  • @anthonymiddlesex6859
    @anthonymiddlesex6859 8 месяцев назад

    look at veiko..........................look at reviews

    • @FlynndoggWoodwork
      @FlynndoggWoodwork  8 месяцев назад

      Oh thanks for sharing that! I haven't heard of them, but I will be checking them out tonight! :). Thanks for watching anthony!

  • @garybecker4490
    @garybecker4490 Год назад +1

    I wanted to like this but couldn't take all the comedic interludes.