Nehru - The UNTOLD Truth | Textbooks Won't Teach This
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
- Link:kukufm.page.link/CSgD3KxqMjrp...
Coupon code :SSS50
(Coupon valid for first 250 users)
Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first Prime Minister's birthday coincides with Children's Day this past week.
For the last 75 years, we have been told a particular, curated story about our First PM, Jawaharlal Nehru. But did you know that this story is incomplete? There is a side to Nehru that we haven't been shown, which casts his legacy in a very different light.
In this video, we will talk about the Untold Truth of Jawaharlal Nehru, India's First Prime Minister - A truth Indian textbooks don't want to show you.
👚Buy New Sham Sharma Show Merch:
kadakmerch.com/collections/th...
🤝🏾Support The Sham Sharma Show on Patreon & unlock exclusive perks:
www.patreon.com/user?u=13603950
🎤Join The Discord:
/ discord
📺Subscribe To The Sham Sharma Show Global:
/ @shamsharmashowglobal
0:00 Intro
0:56 An Englishman In An Indian Body
3:29 Pseudo Secularism
6:31 Non-Aligned Movement
9:26 Over-Socialization Of The Economy
10:26 Nehru And Bose & Book Recommendation
11:42 The Man Who Curbed Free Speech
13:46 Nehru's Legacy
#nehru #childrensday #jawaharlalnehru
-------------------------------------------------
Watch More Episodes:
👩🏾Nupur Sharma Meltdown: • Want To Defend Nupur S...
🍿Movie Reviews: • Bhuj: The Pride Of Ind...
😭 Liberal Meltdowns: • Liberal Meltdown Compi...
😡 Hinduphobia: • Hinduphobia
👳🏾♂️ Farmers Protests: • Farmers Protests
🛕 Ram Mandir/Ayodhya: • Ayodhya/Ram mandir Ver...
🩳Shorts: • #shorts
------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Sham:
Facebook: / shamsharmashow
Twitter: / shambhav15
Instagram: / shamsharmashow
Email Inquiries: contact@shamsharmashow.com
Feedback: shambhav10@gmail.com 
Развлечения
Get 50% Off Your Kuku FM Subscription:
kukufm.com/hindi?lang=hn&referrer=singular_click_id%3Dc7733a1a-16d6-4eda-8b87-8ef935f88c60&
Coupon code - SSS50
(Valid for first 250 users)
@shortly nhi jo bhi ho nehru ne kiya hai
Video on shraddha and Nidhi?
35 pieces ?!/love jihad?
Video on shraddha and Nidhi?
35 pieces ?!/love jihad?
@@kaushik-cy6vo bhai aap se ek shawal hai jawab doge kya btato
10:41 s mei GANDHIJI HOGA 🤬Netaji nahi
I love 💕 নেতাজি সুভাষচন্দ্র বসু
I don't know how Nehruji was close to children but one person that I know who was very close to children was Dr. APJ Kalam sir. If any children's day exists it should be on his birthday.
right
There is already students day for him
@@siriog I think teacher's day is celebrated on the birth anniversary of sarvapalli radhakrishnan
Reading day is celebrated for Dr APJ Abdul Kalam
Absolutely
Dhruv rathee and sham sharma
Divided by opinions united by kuku FM😂
Are bhai bhai 😆
Sab Saale KuKu FM ko promote kar raha. Mohak and Think School bhi. Inko KUKU FM bula ke debate karwaye 🤣
@@SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi sahi me
🙃😃
@@roktimjojo5573 are behan h
You ate 🔥😂
I am an ICSE student & I absolutely love Geopolitics- all because of people like S.Jaishankar, Abhijit Chavda & Sham Sharma Show...
Matlab whatsapp chap gyan ki vajah se
Icse se hone ka koi relation nhi h isse tu bss shorts jyada dekh rha h inki
@@mohakroy821 nahi maa paa marne ki bad usko kane walo tum jaisi logo se😂
You should also check out world affairs
*World Affairs* bhi ckeck kro...
Such a gentle way of saying the truth. One thing need to be changed. Nehru's intention was ANTI-HINDU and politicians say but they don't keep words because their intentions are not what they say. Nehru's intention internally and his execution of Anti-Hindu agenda was always there.
Tumko kaise pata ye, nehru ne sapne Mai aake bataya ye tumhe?
@@ericgrey2884 Tu kya sapne mein rehta hai. Nehru ki books speech uski policies nahi padhi?
Lost half kashmir
Lost half Ladakh in his terms
Declared himself as Bharat Ratna
@reetu6836 so don't you think knocking the doors of UN on kashmir issue is a stupid thing, our army is capable of taking it back and asked for time. Why Nehru wanted UN intervention?
@reetu6836 I am talking about sovereignty of nation and you are labelling me to bjp. This is the problem with today's people who don't vote for bjp. If some one is taking pride on their culture and civilization, people starting labelling them as bjp ka banda and bhakth. May be this is the reason for bjp's success.
If it is Muslim majority, then we should handover it to Pakistan?
Aap ke logic ke hisab se Bharat ek civilizational centric country banana chahiye kya
Aantankwaadi ko Kuch din mai tho Mita nahi sakte
I am from telangana who voted for congress for the first time in 2018 just because they are responsible for the formation of state. It doesn't mean that I am andbhakth of congress and I will criticize them and I will not vote for congress in upcoming elections because there is lack of unity wich I clearly saw in recent bi elections
We lost half of the kashmir, agree!
But did you guys noticed everyone forgot about people of kashmir that includes kashmiri pandits and muslims. No big step been taken yet for there development, no govt. Ever helped them. If think, raja hari singh was the best ruler for kashmir because after him people of kashmir never been in peace.
EVERY POLITICAL PARTY whether india or pak play same kashmir cars to gain votes, but no solution to the problem- the welfare of kashmiri people. People of kashmir now have 2 different opinions half want kashmir with india and half with pak.
We should focus on what's next, not what blunder nehru did, he had a lot to do, bcuz india was broken that time
Jai hind
@@akinapallysaikumar1419 very well stated. congress PMs have been totally useless and sold out India. At least we now have a PM whom has the balls to walk with world leaders not behind them as was the case with that Jagmohan Singh
Apne dadaji se bolte yahi chizz ki kyu nhi gye ladni uss tym pura Kashmir hamara hota dadaji 2 tamacha mar kar bhaga dege
Beti - KGB agent
Khud - British Agent
Lekin papa (motilal) freedom fighter! Waah kya logic hai!
In December 1922, Chittaranjan Das, Narasimha Chintaman Kelkar and Motilal Nehru formed the Congress-Khilafat Swarajaya Party with Das as the president and Nehru as one of the secretaries. Other prominent leaders included Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy and Subhas Chandra Bose of Bengal, Vithalbhai Patel and other Congress leaders who were becoming dissatisfied with the Congress. The other group was the 'No-Changers', who had accepted Gandhi's decision to withdraw the movement.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@@harisbhai20 as u said… this clearly shows that he had no confidence in the people of this country but the brits and other Europeans…. or american
Children's Day should on birthday of Dr.APJ Abdul kalam ❤😊
Sham
Your hardwork will help Hindustan
Jai O🚩
An eye opener for andhbhakts of Nehru Ji. One of the good intentions that you missed about Chacha Nehru is his interview to Play Boy.
one side narrative
@@_avane one side narrative is what we all were reading and listening for past 70 years . Now, whatever is coming out is the other side of that narrative.
@@_avane Aisa kya Nehru andhbhakt?
For the first time, a person is using the Andhbhakt word in a different way. God bless you sir...
@@omkarsakpal130 Lie harder, British bootlicking Sanghis will never get any credit for independence or for making of India.
British - Motilal Nehru - Nehru - Indira Gandhi - Rajiv Gandhi - Sonia Gandhi - Rahul Gandhi + Priyanka Gandhi
rehan rajiv gaandhi
Everybody. Sabke sab chor hain sale
Sergeant mohandas Gandhi bhi
why Motilal Nehru
Pappu 🤣🤣
Hello, just a correction Nehru was not elected, he was selected as PM of India by MK Gandhi, cabinet wanted to appoint Sardar Patel however Gandhi said we need a Harvard graduate that can deal with british
Nehru got the seat by cheating Sardar Patel...!!
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@@harisbhai20 your views are exactly what's being taught in the name of Indian history in our schools..😂😂
Harvard graduate my foot! Mohandas and Nehru are nothing but British agents
@@venkatganapathy3123Absolutely correct.😂
Thank you for saying the truth so bluntly 🧡👏
Abe tere ko chutiya bana raha he.Sach jaana he naa toh book padhle
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
If Lakshwadeep is Indian territory today
It's just because of Sardar Patel ji
Whole india is because of patel ji
@@lalitbhatisuper100 nonsense. Patel never wanted Junagadh and Kashmir to be part of India. Nehru and Gandhi worked for that.
But BJP and RSS Sanghis have no role in expanding India. They are only known for reducing Indian territory and making India more unsafe.
@Warrior Bhai lame comeback of a sanghi
@@UJ00UJ seeing that old ghost mw2 on your profile pic, I would say, grow up and man up bro.
You forgot to mention Nehru giving away Coco Island and other regions to Myanmar, refusing the accession request of Balochistan and also the Port of Gwadar, and refusing the merging of Nepal as an Indian state.
Kaha se padhe ho??? This is all fake from watsapp university.
@@lalitpal4336 he studied at night from your mom
@@businesssuccess184 bilkul savarkar ke bhakt lag rhe.... 😆 🤣 kattar hindu saale ek mantra bhi yaad he sanskrit me... kitne number ate the school me chutiye
@@businesssuccess184 why do I only see Hindus use abuse language that too on someone's mother is this written in your religious books?
true and later myanmar rented the same island to china and china is using it to spy on india
Best Example of NEPOTISM
Nehru
Indra Gandhi
Rajiv Gandhi
Soniya Gandhi
Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi
You left out Gen. Kaulitz, vijayalakshmi pandit.
Others can add more.
Amit Shah then Amit Shah ka beta in BCCI
@@pratyaksh979 amit shah beta becomes next prime Minister?
@@pratyaksh979 how can you explain?
@@pratyaksh979 jali nh🤣🤣
Now It is in the list of my one of my Favourite Video's... Gonna share to my Max contacts. 🔥🙏
My principal said in his speech on 14th nov. that nehru ji ko bachhe bhot pasand the,my friends & i literally shouted "aur mountbatten" bhi it was a hella moment even some teachers laughed 😭🤌.. ps- I'm in a school which is close to Vidya Bharti n all
he was pedophile shuklaji
@Rajat katal Kal he paida hua hai bhai tu....bada hoga to Jaan jayega😂
@@patel.nilesh muje bhi nhi pata hai
your friend is GIGA CHAD
Mountbatten was a British officer wife in navy jo nehru aur nehru ji ke bed ke bhoot pass thi
10:37 "Netaji aur Subhash Chandra Bose ke beech me jo differences thi" 😂
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
You encapsulated the information really well!
Finally a video about truth of India , Mad resoect sir!
Lehru was as b @ d as British rule to india 🤣🤣 jo log bolte ki iit banaya AIIMS banaya arre ulti buddhio 🤣 British ne bhi rail , road , COEP , amu fund kiya to firr wo khudke acche ke liye same for lehruu . Koi bhi PM banta to institutions banna Tay tha
@@allahlesboslu2_9 mashalla
ruclips.net/video/N3E534MpkHU/видео.html
Not about truth but about propoganda 🤞
Watch this "Sahebs | History of Subversion of India" from channel: Prachyam
Just seen "sahebs - who never left" really a goosebumps episode by prachyam.
Now waiting for this
Yeah recently Abhi and niyu commented on that one That vdo is much researched before uploading
Spine chilling revelations
Lehru was as b @ d as British rule to india 🤣🤣 jo log bolte ki iit banaya AIIMS banaya arre ulti buddhio 🤣 British ne bhi rail , road , COEP , amu fund kiya to firr wo khudke acche ke liye same for lehruu . Koi bhi PM banta to institutions banna Tay tha
That video is just below this video for me .
Gonna watch it.
@@namu4380 A Moa??
Great job putting Nehru’s legacy in perspective. “Good intentions poor…”
German shepherd:- I fear no man
But that thing
Sham Sharma Sir
It scares me
Ranganathan Sir was best in pointing out nehru as a scavenger
Scavenger. Best possible word for This Non Hindu suar ki awlad.
Nehru has always been HeRo?
The Guy who is *big hearted* that he gifted POK to Pakistan, Coco Island to Myanmar and Aksai Chin to China is truly our National Hero! (Like his own property!)
The Guy who strictly committed to *secularism* such that He allowed the Sufi Imam to make the Mosque but warned Rajendra Prasad to not attend Somnath Temple innaguration is really true Secular guy
The guy who gave up the Permanent Seat of UN to China is *really Big Hearted?* (Today, We would have been more powerful due to that Veto Power)
Our Books show His Contribution in our Independence, I respect that! But Books must not be afraid to talk about the other Facts of our so called National Heroes like Gandhi, Nehru, etc.
I believe there is only one guy who had kept our Motherland United is Subash Chandra Bose! His absence during the Independence really hurts! 😔
I accept that SCB is hero of our nation but why you hate Gandhi atleast he is a man who sacrificed entire life to get freedom for us
@@sadhiquet5495 brother we think he try to United us but mk Gandhi, jawaharlal nehru, Mohammad Ali Jinnah are in the plan with British to divide the country In name of religion. For your kind information it was found that he was a sergant in the British Africa where he came to India to stop the national movement. Congress was also formed due to this purpose
@@sadhiquet5495 🤣🤣🤣great joke
@@sadhiquet5495 and he spend his life in luxury, don't get into the khadi outfit, that's just for formality
@@sadhiquet5495 Ignoring the Conversion of 2000 Hindus, Accusing the Victim to Resist for the Wrong doing, Giving away the 55 Crore to Pakistan, Snatching away presidency from SCB, Didn't let Vallabhai to become PM and what not! Everyone has flaws! He did United People of Bharat through NCM and Civil Disobedience but execution didn't reach the Goal! The Man Who was able to unite us a whole was Subash Chandra Bose!
I am afraid to hear when people says Nehru like children 😜🤣
Nailed it bro ! ❤️💥🙏🔱
Loved it
Please show this episode to your children to understand how opportunities for country’s development was missed high time & put against country’s interest.
No, Sanghi knowledge shouldn't be shown to anybody.
@@harshvardhan298 kata hua chutya detected
Nehru destroyed India's Auto, Aircraft, steel and other industries with his production limits, Licence Raj regime of seeking permission from him to make anything.
Countries way behind India leapfrogged their development.
His agents will tell you he built IITs. These institutes of elites trained students and sent them abroad to serve other countries.
@@rmrrao2675 Nehru is the one who built it all.
Uneducated Sanghi BJP is surviving by selling everything that he created.
Go and get some education.
Best point of all
Greet work mann
Finally someone talks about crusade war , atrocities hindu woman
Kewp the great work up
Jai siya raam 🚩
We were blessed that we got Someone like Pandit Nehru as our First PM.
Watsapp university se gyan lene walo ka sab ka yahi haal hai.
Kitaabon main interest na ho to Watsapp uni. se hi gyan lena padta hai.
Abhi I just read first 230 pages of The Discovery of India. Nehru was like a Gyan ka bhandaar.
Well people like you won’t understand.
Aap Watsapp Uni. main mehnat karte rahea aur all the best.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Thanks God, he was. Educated and a visionary. Dont compare with any.
Imagine where India would be today if it was Netaji Subhas as the first PM.
Shayad fir india aaj hota hi nhi or aaj shyad hum Germany ya Japan ki colonial k under hote
Azadi ki jagah humhe Japan ya Germany ki Gulaami milti.
@@optionseller143 Nehru slave spotted
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
Netaji is a next level legend. Mahatma Gaandu is just shit.
In case anyone missed it ! Prachyam has released the Indic documentary " Sahebs:who never left " ! Kindly watch it and share too ! It's high time to push Indic Narattive 🍂
At 10:30 you said netaji and Subash Chandra Bose instead of nehru ji 😂😂😂, by the way love your videos
It's believed that "NEHRU", the surname was abducted from "NEHRI"... Courtesy "M. Mathai", the PS to Gazi Nehri's Son.
His birthday should not be actually Children's Day it should be Chamdi Divas. ☝ no ka chamdi tha yeah. 1st product of Nepotism. He never won the election for 1st prime minister also. That Takla Monhandas wanted Gandhi name into History books. That is why he became the Prime Minister. His gifts to India are 75 years old Kashmir Issue, Nepal not being a part of India as state, when Nepal came up front that I want to become a part of India to name a few.
His birthday should be actually called as traitor 's day .
Lehru was as b @ d as British rule to india 🤣🤣 jo log bolte ki iit banaya AIIMS banaya arre ulti buddhio 🤣 British ne bhi rail , road , COEP , amu fund kiya to firr wo khudke acche ke liye same for lehruu . Koi bhi PM banta to institutions banna Tay tha
Nepal alag desh hi thik hain bhai, Nepal is a independent Hindu Rashtra now. So, let that go.
@@yaamdut.001 no it's not Hindu nation for last 15 years now. It's communist.
Coward bootlicking Sanghis have no contribution in independence movement or in making of India. That's why they think everyone else should be treated like stupid Sanghis.
That Harry Potter part was just hilarious 🤣🤣🤣
Abra Kadabra! 😂😂😂
Sardar Ballav Bai Patel actually didn't want to get Kashmir at first. But Nehru wanted to add Kashmir by any cost because it was his birth place.
Wow AC sir 💓. He's my favourite speaker for all time
Caste discrimination is rooted not in religion but culture. Caste was an ancient system of occupational class delineated in Hindu texts that over the years developed into a rigid social hierarchy. The lowest castes, or untouchables, were marginalized and faced persecution. Caste-based discrimination is not intrinsic to Hinduism and should not be thought of as religiously sanctioned.
EXACTLY !!! 💯 💯 💯 Hare Krishna.
@@Horizon429 Also many caste apologist who justify caste or who glorifies caste system say that caste system is a western construct. Well the best thing about hindutva is that hindutva opposes this bloody caste system
@@Horizon429 that verse says about qualities of a person, and also, please check who is Brahmin, read Bhagavad Gita (if u r a ☪️, then u will have to commit Shariya if u have to read other religion's books)
Btw Islam- Shiya, Sunni, Ajlaf, Ashraf
Christianity- Narad Christian, Dalit Christian, Syrian Christian, Catholics, Protestants, etc.
See mirror before questioning others
Caste system or hindusim train or railway tracks jesn hy . Alag alg hy pr sath me hin chalte hy 🙄 kuch bhi krlo baley hi saren hindu Caste system ko ab promote nhin krna chate pr phir bhi kyon caste system ko katm krne ki baat nhin krah hy.
🥺 Me hindusim ki baat kra ho sanatan dharm ki nhin jo vedic philosophy pr based hy spirituality pr.
Jabki hindusim mixture khichdi hy 🤫 . Caste system ,anglo adulteration , rituals festivals traditional ka mixture hy
@@Horizon429but good or bad are qualities your point don't proof anything
Basically, Lehru Chicha was among those Brown Saheb who never left India.
Now Pappu is forwarding his legacy.
By the way, Your videos are serious and full of Humor.
you should watch Sahebs Who Never Left by Prachyam
@@BUSHCRAFTSURVIVAL He most probably has seen that considering how he framed his sentence
@@chaitanyavelamala7268 exactly
@@localnerd104 Regardless of how much illiterate Sanghis work to brainwash you, the facts will never change.
@@UJ00UJ Same for chamchas and chatukaars as well
Very well put!
One thing which I found regarding Nehru's contribution, that :
After independence and during the process of decolonisation, many emerging third world nations had adopted democracy but very soon their leaders turned their political regime from democratic to military dictatorship like, in the case of non-aligned nations like Ghana, Chile...
He controlled his ambitions by not entering in a totalitarian state, as he could if he wanted like others...
“The road to hell is paved with good intentions” - his ideology and arrogance destroyed the lives of millions of Indians
Calling him complicated character is silly, you are giving more credit than he deserves, he clearly had ulterior motives, and it was not good intention and bad execution, it was bad intention and well executed.
Heartily agree with you
If he had ulterior motives. Why does he care to even come to india. He was rich enough to stay back in Britain and relax there. He did want to do something to india. Why did he even marry kamala(his wife) and come back to india. He could have settled by marrying there itself. Narrow minded thinking
I don't agree with sham on this one. Read his books. He was right for his age and Time for most part
So true.
What tells you that he had ulterior motives
Lehru was the as wrong choice for PM's chair as it could get. An elite, culturally disconnected person who was more interested in Edwina than anything else was not the kind we needed then.
Once a hero forgotten as a culprit, not because of his deeds but fruit of whtapp University..got independence in 1947 with famines & unsecured borders & disputes with in country with royal states...my only question is with out the consent of prime minister sardar Patel ji can go for state vilay or war against Nizam...we have great leaders don't blame or defame them.without knowing anything...
Sam sharma and german shepard are tied by kuku FM 🤣
Just like your father's 😂😂😂
😂😂
Sardar sahab is alive our hearts
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
Jai Shree Ram Jai Hind Sir 🙏🙏
Well explained with mind blowing music 😊
Nehru ji took "make love, not war" very seriously!
,🤮
Bhosdike wale Chacha kabhi neta ji na ban sake
Teri dadi ma ka afair tha kya Nehru ke saath 😂🤣🤣
Love ke bad war e ata hai, itna make love hoga to population baar jayga . So they will start fight
Make love means “Sex”. I am sure he didn’t mean that. Lol….
7:17 I told same thing to one of my foreign friend. He asked me proof. Sadly I had only some random RUclips videoes as proofs. So he denied my statement.
That's why we tell to actually read and verify sources than to believe any random youtube guy
Gandhi & nehru patel & bose were all true heroes
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
Thanks sham sharma show for telling real story of Nehru
Shambhav Ji is a true Hindu cultural nationalist. He was educated in a gurkul and lives a sadhu life in Hardwar. Be like Shambhav Ji 😂
Excellent said and please keep doing this great work
Imagine if bjp existed after 1947 till now...there would have been no terrorism..
Netaji and his supporters used to beat up Hindu Mahasabha members.
*Hindu Rashtra* ❤️👑
Andar aa sakta hu is epic
very matured way of tackling the topic
I disagree with the "good intentions" statement
*I want to bring this to your notice.Please watch 'SHAHEB'S WHO NEVER LEFT'.A groundbreaking reality of congress and India.I want you to please make a video about this and make it viral as it should be made noticed by other Indians🙏*
The Sham Sharma Show And Guests On Renveer's Podcast Opened My Eyes And Changed The Perspective Of ( shri 😖 ) Gandhi And Nehru
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
Those who criticise modi for being a dictator either dont know about nehru or purposedly avoid the topic
I must that Nehru Ji's legacy is totally irrelevant in today's india. We only remember him when it's 14th November. 😅
Neheru Gandhi was British Agent 👍
One quality of Nehru ji I admire is that he was very nuch insistent on India catching up with technology ( space research, nuclear power, defence research..etc..) with the western nations even when the liberals and communistsythen arguing India should not be looking towards technological development since it is a poor country. At least that he did not fall for the liberal narrative.
Lol mallu
Good to see that in the name of giving respect to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Subhas Chandra Bose we start abusing nehru and Gandhi 👏🏻👏🏻. We thought or true also that in past 70 years government did not pay such respect which sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Subhas Chandra Bose deserved but we also never disrespect and abuse any freedom fighters because all of them are our heroes and all of them are on same page.
Leaders should be scrutinized and criticized for wrong decision and praised for good one but we should not disrespect any freedom fighters at all.
It is very sad to see that we start abusing our heroes.
Thats one i believes
He is not our hero and never will be
I am a centrist and u are right but we should not ignore their negative side
Bro ❤❤❤❤
Absolutely
When Nehru Ji died & many congress leaders were crying, a very famous leader said "Why are you crying? What Nehru actually did?"
He said,
'Nehru gave the INDIA ASH,
Nehru gave the WORLD GAS,
& Nehru gave his DAUGHTER CASH.'
Thank you for this video!
Unki jagh sardar Vallabh bhai patel ko India ka first Prime Minister banna chahiye tha.. to aaj hamare desh ki kuch or hi condition hoti hai... Jai hind🙏
Left or Right, Kuku FM is permanent
Hamare school me kisine bhi children's day celebrate nhi kiya
100% true
I am not lying
I would like to see MORE about Nehru's untold legacy!TNX!
Abhijit Chavda Sir always throws truth bombs
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
Please review on the documentry by Prachyam - Sahebs Wo Never Left
My favorite love story is nehru-Edwina's❤️ story and the role of Mountbatten🧐 (husband of her) for developing love between them.😅
Just one correction Sham, Bad Intensions-Good execution!
Nehru, a true villain.
Yakeen mano current ki sarkar to jaise good planning aur very good execution ka example hai 😌
The truth that you are freely making a video on him without any fear is because of him
Can't believe the comments. How these people are brainwashed thinking nehru was the villain.
Those who have watched this documentary do Like .
"Sahebs Who never Left"
Well explained documentary ❣️🔥
but subash chandra boss is also socialist and anti american so if he become pm india will be on same path as nehru , actually all our freedom fighter are socialist and communist ( bhagat singh) so its difficult if we think that we become capitalist like japan and south korea which are heavily monitor by USA
Very good research done bhai !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
First time seen someone in comments with same surname of mine 😂
One video on vision Netaji subhash chandra bose please , ( a what if video , if Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was selected in place of Nehru what would have the impact on decisions)
Excellent Video...👏👏👏👍🙏🙂
People seem to be seeming the real connection between Nehru and children.
Nehru liked children .
Mountbatten had a fetish for small children .
Nehru liked Edwina .
Edwina do , children lo.
If country was broken in the name of religion then why only we are still following the Secularism
becoz we have Jews,Christians,Sikh,Jains etc.
@@shifujikafan3720 hahaha sikh is not a religion.. christians were converted by discriminatory taxes so were mullas and i am a jain.. dont try to full us.. first learn sikh religious books its all about hinduism.. joker.. i can write write and write about how their guru maharaj itself were devout hindus
@@shifujikafan3720 Christmas and Jews ka Jane ne origin alag he. Sikh or Jain to alane hi bande he na bhai.
I have one question always in my mind...
Is there any contribution of nehru in freedom fight of Bharat?
And if yes, what was that contribution?
Leg licking of British? That's why he became pm of india not Netaji
@@Xeta007 sala chutiya nehru ben gaya hamara 1st pm
netaji ne hame independence diya aur nehru chutiya sala pm ban gaya
Netaji aur Subhashchandra Bose? 10:37
Did he mean Nehruji and Subhashchandra Bose?
Watched SAHEBS...who never left ! Waiting for part 2 !
The biggest legacy of jehru ji is Kashmir ssue which is still relevant, after claim millions of lives and economical advancement of our country
You are right
Nehru will remain a hero in the minds of all future generations. All attempts to belittle him wll never be successful.
His father financied Gandhis political shows and purchased pm post according to Bratish interest. The sole agents of Indian disasters (partition and conseqens of wars and terrerism) Nehru and Gandhi
Any dought read The real untold truth behind the closed door of the Indian independence movements . Con Gvt banned book written by an Indian read 56 years ago. Ever since the real heroes Chandra sekhar Azad Bhagath sing ,Nethaji lives in my Indian heart .
Nehru already had in his mind what could be the consequences of those acts which u r calling as "good intentions". In other words, he deliberately did those acts for his self interest and political interest. After all, he is a politician, he has far seeing ability. A politician has the power to understand what can be the consequence of a particular act.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC.
As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
सर, विर पृथ्वीराज चौहान जी🚩 की तुलना नेहरू से करना गलत है
😁
I think the most foundational flaw of his was that he thought we had flaws in terms of our civilizational values and we should rectify that by learning from the west.
Mujhe apki video list dekhkar bahut achha laga 👏👏 aur ye video bhi jabardast hai
Jai shree Ram♥️
Without lies Islam dies
Support Ex Muslims sahil adam seeker and zafar heretic channel💪