How Much Suspension Do You Need? | Over-Biked Vs Under-biked
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июл 2024
- Unfortunately, there isn't one do-it-all mountain bike! Enduro bikes are the closest MTB that we have to an all-mountain monster, a blend of trail bike manoeuvrability with downhill-like travel and geometry. Neil Donoghue is at Dyfi Bike Park to race his Downhill Bike (Nukeproof Dissent) against his Enduro Bike (Orbea Rallon) and a Trail Bike (Canyon Spectral). Neil wants to find out not only which bike is quickest, but which offers the most fun and comfort.
⏱ Timestamps ⏱
0:00 - Intro
0:10 - What Is Overbiking/Underbiking
2:33 - Enduro Bike
4:37 - Trail Bike
6:35 - Downhill Bike
8:12 - The Result
Useful Links:
Racing Highlights & More On GMBN Racing 👉 gmbn.eu/GMBNracing
Watch Shorts on GMBN 👉 gmbn.eu/GMBNshorts
Submit your Photo and Video to us 👉 upload.gmbn.com/
Sign-up to our newsletter 👉 gmbn.eu/newsletter
What do you prefer? Being over-biked or under-biked? Let us know! 👇
Watch more on GMBN...
📹 How To Buy A Second Hand Mountain Bike 👉 • How To Buy A Second Ha...
📹 Watch our Editor’s Choice Playlist 👉 gmbn.eu/EditorsChoice
📹 Watch our weekly show, The Dirt Shed Show 👉 gmbn.eu/dirtshedplaylist
🎵 Music - licensed by Epidemic Sound 🎵
Acai Bowl - Timothy Infinite
Gotta - Smartface
Pink Poppy - Heyson
Comparison - dreem
Genesis - Ooyy
Future Daze - Major Tweaks
#GMBN #GlobalMountainBikeNetwork #MTB #MountainBiking #underbike #overbike #dyfi #bikepark
The Global Mountain Bike Network (GMBN) is the world’s largest and fastest-growing online mountain bike channel and community - and your destination for the best mountain bike content in the world.
GMBN is dedicated to inspiring and unlocking your riding potential. Our videos cater to fans of every mountain bike discipline: from mile-munching cross-country (XC) riders, through adrenaline-fuelled dirt jumpers, gravity-hungry downhillers or aspiring enduro racers, and beyond.
Every day of every month, our ex-pro presenting team are on hand to entertain and inspire you while also providing a uniquely qualified insight into the world of mountain biking. Every week we deliver original daily videos that include:
Adventurous and entertaining features
Mountain bike skills coaching
Technical advice and guidance
Mechanical know-how to keep you rolling
A place for the riding community with our weekly Dirt Shed Show
Thanks to our sponsors:
Canyon Bikes: gmbn.eu/Canyon
Nukeproof Bikes: gmbn.eu/nukeproof
Orbea Bikes: gmbn.eu/Orbea
Park Tool: gmbn.eu/ParkTool
Smith Helmets & Eyewear: gmbn.eu/Smith
Crankbrothers Pedals: gmbn.eu/crankbros
Shimano Footwear: gmbn.eu/ShimanoShoes
Ergon: gmbn.eu/ergon
Vittoria Tires: gmbn.eu/Vittoria
FSA: gmbn.eu/fsa
Spank: gmbn.eu/Spank
Topeak: gmbn.eu/topeak
Garmin: gmbn.eu/Garmin
Peaty's Products: gmbn.eu/Peatys
Wahoo: gmbn.eu/WahooTraining
Worx Power Tools: gmbn.eu/Worx
CamelBak: gmbn.eu/CamelBak
Watch our sister channels:
GMBN Racing - gmbn.eu/GMBNracing
GMBN Tech - / gmbntech
Electric Mountain Bike Network - / embn
GMBN auf Deutsch - / gmbnaufdeutsch
Global Cycling Network - / gcn
GCN Tech - / gcntech
GCN Racing - / gcnracing
Global Triathlon Network - / gtn
GCN Italia - / gcnitalia
GCN en Espanol - / gcnenespanol
GCN auf Deutsch - / gcnaufdeutsch
GCN en Francais - / gcnenfrancais
GCN Japan - / gcnjapan
GCN Training - / gcntraining 
Спорт
![Sean Rii, Karyon, Sharzkii - Taungule [My Love] (Official Music Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJoMuypbSzQ/mqdefault.jpg)
150/160 is not really a trail bike. I think they should redo the test with a 140/140 trail bike instead
It’s NOT a trail bike it’s more a baby enduro or All mountain. Neil just wanted an excuse to ride the 150 spectral and bit his self in the A*s doing it! Now everyone is talking 💩 in the comments😂😂🤣
My 130mm/130mm, 27.5" trail bike is being slowly rebranded into an XC bike!
I agree, trail bike should be up to 130mm travel
up to? no@@taranveerkarir9203
My trail bike has 138 150.
Spectral isn't really under-biked for that terrain though 🤷♂️
Came here to say exactly this. 160/150 travel is pretty much Enduro category anyway, which is what Canyon categorise it as.
It would be interesting to see how it would be on a 120/120 travel bike?
yeah right dim tordo even raced the spectral in many enduro worldcup races
@@colincoulthard3021 yeah, going 10/15 mm shorter travel shouldnt be meaningful, i bet tyres were more influential than the bike itself
140 mm is never under-biked unless you are doing freeride. even running it on uci world cup dh tracks is sufficient enough unless you want to win. but for weekend rides? nah, its fun enough.
Yeah the Spectral just goes nomnomnom on that kind of trail
I have an enduro bike, which is definitely "over-biked' for my local trails, which are all cross county in nature. However, I'm in my mid 60's, and appreciate the extra comfort. Plus, we do travel 2-3 times a year to ride more challenging trails, and it's nice to have confidence that my bike (and I) will be confident about our capabilities.
Not sure if it's a British thing. But, I would certainly put a 150/160 bike into enduro category. A 120 to 140 max would be more of a "trail" bike.
I would have liked the video more if it was the baby Canyon Spectral 125, for a bigger contrast.
Definitely, I've the 125 and every trail is party time, I enjoy being under biked.
A 125 travel bike at Dyfi? I don't know which would break first, the bike or Neil?
@@mrvwbug4423 its 140f125r and same geo
I’m over 50 and I need 300mm travel front and rear for my Florida trails lol
This one made me chuckle
After 40 years of mtb'ing, the best bikes I have had were bikes that had a lot of adjustments in the frame (one example could change suspension travel 145 to 160) paired with a on the fly adjustable travel fork (130/160). Moving one bolt on the shock allowed me to set the bike up for whatever the day would bring (extremely helpful on any trip). Bike manufacturers don't really design bikes like that so they can sell more models. At the end of that day though, whatever your riding, just have fun.
Thank you for the comparison video. I feel like this does help people consider what they really want to use their bike for. Me, I’m 40 and ride a Marin rift zone XR which is 130/140. Before that I exclusively rode around on a hard tail and learned how to let the bike move underneath me quite well. My trail bike has opened up a whole world of playful opportunities!
Fun topic, I definitely enjoy over-biking 👍 Not because I wish I were riding double blacks, but because I enjoy being comfortable lol and, as an average rider, it gives me more confidence on sketchy features when I come across them.
150/160mm is a trail bike now?!
That's what I said, LOL. My trail is 130/140, enduro is 160/170
Yep, not a good video, 150/160 isn't a short travel trail bike
yeah my trail is 140/140
150/160 is definitely an enduro by my standard
Canyon categorizes the Spectral as enduro!
I tend to go with over biked as it's easy to adjust the suspension for the trail you're riding that day. Under biked means you probably have multiple bikes for different things and it's not really affordable with current pricing.
I'd probably question whether a less experienced rider (like myself!) would feel a significant difference between a trail and enduro bike. It'd probably be interesting seeing a few new-ish riders out on a range of bikes and seeing their takes on them, as a lot of newer riders probably only have experience of hardtails
Probably not, because you’re likely to be riding both well within their capabilities. The trail bike would be nicer to pedal uphill.
Imho the biggest difference in feel comes down to tyrechoice.
Put a heavy DD casing for aggressive riding on your trailbike and it will feel heavy and slow on the uphill and grippy/more secure on the downhill.
Using the same tyre combo on a trail vs a (non-extreme) enduro bike shouldn't make much of a difference, unless you are racing. The 20mm difference on the suspension might help an inexperienced rider on some line choice mistakes/sloppy jumping, but the difference would be negligible, because you're not riding as fast and/or in as technical challenging terrain as a beginner.
I.e. pick the bike that is tailored to the stuff you'll be riding on a regular basis; most of the full suspension bikes nowadays are capable enough, even the short travel models, and the deciding factor is the person riding the bike.
Look at a modern enduro bike as a downhill bike that you can pedal uphill. So unless you have the abilities and skills / confidence to ride pretty challenging trails e.g. the Slab Track at Dyfi then you don't really need an enduro. If you are less experienced and ride an enduro bike it's going to be pretty dead and unchallenging for you. If you started with a trail bike then hit a point where you wanted to go further and the bike is holding you back, then maybe consider an enduro rig.
You definitely feel the difference, I’m not a pro but can definitely feel the difference between bikes and use the ones I’ve got for their intended style… usually…😬
For a new-ish rider on green/blue trails without a lot of fast downhill an enduro bike will probably feel big and ponderous. but they will feel very confident on downhill tech. If you're at the point where you're leaning the bike over to corner, are comfortable with jumping and are already pumping the bike on trail features even on regular trails, then you might be able to get some speed out of an enduro bike to the point where it comes alive.
Nice insight as usual Neil. So many variables but I think age and how much your body is hammered plays a part. I've been riding since '92 and had a fair few injuries. I lean on the overbiked side purely for comfort and having a bit more to play with on the rougher stuff as you mention.
I think i agree now 😀
Same. Even my road bike has 50mm seat suspension
Young guys at the bike shop I purchase my bikes from are ALWAYS under biking me. I have to remind them I am a geezer.
@@BlackMan614 I've not had a great experience with advice at bike shops.. I seem to get "you want a road/MTB/etc bike? There they are. More money equals better, it's just a question of what you're willing to spend. The bike has to be name-matched to the task (road for road). If that doesn't work for you, you need to accept that."
Things like the 175mm cranks (right size for 5'11"/1.8m rider) being slapped on everything have highlighted for me that bike companies/sellers don't care if it's right for the owner.
The thing is, you can also build your trail bike with Enduro parts, but keep it mid travel. Ive seen alot of trail bikes with 150/140 travel-27.5 or even 140/130 29ers running 4 piston brakes big 200mm+ rotors, 35/36 mm stanchions fork, rear shocks with piggybacks, enduro tires. You could definitely build a mid travel Burly bike.
bumped my Yeti SB 5.5 up to a Fox 38x170 and have burly wheels on it. Looking to get an insanely light (but tough) wheel set with light trail tires on it so it’s more fun on my local trails that I usually ride my SS hard tail (160mm Ohlins coil) on. I love tweaking my bikes to fit my terrain and riding style. the companies have to cater to sales volume so they generally don’t excel in specific areas within their product lineups
I've just finished exactly that build. SC Hightower frame (so 145mm shock) but Fox 36 160mm, Hope Tech 4 E4 brakes (200F/180R), DT Swiss XMC 1501 wheels, 180mm dropper, SRAM AXS X01 drivetrain. Minion DHR II front and back. Very much in the All Mountain box, but it weighs exactly 14kg inc pedals, so it's a great trail bike that can also get me down anything without big drops (or anything within my ability!!). I love it.
@@SprSonik13I'd definitely recommend the DT Swiss XMC 1501 wheels if they're in your budget. Just over 1500g for the pair, but All Mountain rated. I love them (altho the DT Swiss 240 hubs are a bit loud).
I did this on both my previous bikes which weren't enduro bikes. My Giant Trance had SLX 2 pots, 203mm rotor up front, front travel extended to 160mm and Assegai/Dissector tire combo. My Ibis Ripmo had a set of DT Swiss FR560 wheels (got tired of killing Ibis rims), XT 4 pots with 203mm rotors at both ends, cascade link, DVO Onyx fork, and cushcore out back. Each was fun in its own way, the Giant was a great little jumper but too short and outdated geo for steep tech. The Ripmo just did everything pretty well and was fairly confident on steep tech. I now have a full on 160/170 travel enduro bike and the difference on faster terrain is night and day even vs the 151/160 travel Ibis. The Ripmo felt fine on big bike terrain, but the enduro bike feels like an absolute weapon on the same terrain.
In the last 4 years the definition of each categories has increased by 10-20mm across the board.
I remember when everyone thought the Norco sight was an enduro bike.
seems the only way to truly compare is to run the same wheels and tires on the trail in Enduro bikes. That way you’re seeing the differences purely from the frame/suspension. I used to run a heavy, aggressive, tire wheel set and a light fast tire wheel set on the same bike, and it completely changed the bike. I went from a fleet of bikes down to one aggressive hard tail and one big trail bike when I realized that wheel entire selection made much more difference than 20 mm of travel and 1/2 degree in the head tube
Your videos are usually excellent, and the concept here is interesting. However, even Canyon categorizes the Spectral as an enduro bike. There was not nearly enough contrast.
For restitution, you should redo the video with the Orbea against a Spectral 125 and a hardtail.
You’re trying to kill the poor guy! Mind you ….
I thought he was gonna do a downhill, enduro and cross country initially
A 125 travel bike and a hardtail might break at Dyfi, people don't realize how insane that bike park is. Dyfi was built to train pro DH racers and most of the trails are pro lines (beyond double black).
would love to see how a short travel vs long travel version of the same bike compare. The Canyon Spectral comes in 150 and 125 versions.
Fair to say Dyfi isn't a great barometer of under vs over biked. That's the bike park that has developed a reputation for being unrideable by anyone short of a pro (most of its trails are pro lines). My current bike is a RM Altitude, yes it's a proper enduro bike, but manages to be more lively even on blue trails and more comfortable for big pedal days than the Ibis Ripmo I had before it. It's unreal ability to carry speed makes even blue trails fun on it, because you start railing corners and try to send it off every rock and root. The plush ride of the enduro bike is also nice for comfort, especially when you're not in your 20s or 30s anymore.
Third. I prefer to be over biked so I can take those big hits without bottoming out
Was good to have a chat with you on the day bud, really interesting look at riding Iv done similar as I had a polygon Siskiu D5 now riding a specialized BIGHIT 1 with tripples I’m definitely over biked now but feels so much more comfortable at DYFi.
I rode my Whyte T-140 down those exact trails; never once did I feel out of my depth, but I would have been happier on an enduro bike
If you're confident on Dyfi trails, then you're well above the skill level of the average rider. So you're probably one of those who likes to ride underbiked for the challenge.
The don's the best gmbn presenter in my opinion , always solid content and no childish nonsense like the other presenters are getting into more and more .
I consider 150/160 enduro. My trail bike is 115/130.
That's xc these days 😜
Great video. I know what you mean about people naturally overbike. I did this with my previous bike, a Norco Range Carbon. Now I’m on a Santa Cruz tallboy which has a lot less travel and it fits my riding better. 😊
100 mm xc hardtails for everything that i ride whitout a dropper.
I ride a 150/140 Trek Fuel EX, it gives me plenty of travel for chunk but I can flip the Minot link and adjust the compression settings on days when I’m just doing XC riding with my wife(she’s 120/120)…it works well for me and my 56 year old knees.
I went from a 160mm/140mm 29'r to a 150/130mm 27.5 and am way happier. The 29'r was a monster truck and could just mow things over but the shorter travel 27.5 is just more fun to ride. Even though you have to be a bit more selective on lines, that actually kinda adds to the enjoyment. You have to hop around its a challenge.
The old bike might have been faster going down but thats not really what I am after.
I switched from 27,5 to a mullet and its much better now on the chunk, but on jumps the front needs to be pulled more because the weight drags it down. I did have a 29er a couple of years ago and I agree what you say. Even though im 6 ft 2. Any tight corners were much harder and while doing bunny hop it felt forever to pull off. Jumping was so weird.
I’m an older riders with a great deal of experience, in my case mostly off-road motorcycle racing, but have ridden bikes for decades and stayed pretty darned fit. Guys like me will trade off the extra thrill of a lighter, livelier bike for the extra control/safety of a more capable bike. Turning the pedals has never been my problem. Avoiding crashes and injury are very important. So yeah, I’ll work a little harder and perhaps arrive a little later but I want to get there in one piece no matter what the terrain offers up. I’m riding a Specialized Stumpjumper Evo expert with 150/160mm travel and don’t find it at all unmanageable. I’m 73yrs, 169mm and 61 kilos.
Not that I expect anybody to care, but most riders would be better off “over biked”. Not having enough fun and thrills?? Then just go faster…
Well that is respect. I hope your joints stay in a very good condition as long as they can. 😅
Well done, I agree with what you said BUT you should do the same test on a more "natural" set of trails where pedalling is more prominent
Nice comparison Neil. Your attention to important details was excellent. I would probably 'over-tire' my 160/150 travel trail bike to address such trail conditions.
150/160 travel bikes can ride pretty much anything an enduro bike can, just a little slower and with a less smooth ride. I rode an Ibis Ripmo for 3 years and basically had DH wheels on it (DT Swiss FR560s) and then ran EXO+ tires with a cush core out back. Used it on everything from pedally XC trails to bike park days, it did the job though the 38lb weight wasn't conducive to going up and the ride got chattery at the bike park when the speeds came up. I now ride a 160/170 travel enduro bike and it's faster, more confident and more comfortable and weighs 4lbs less. I would generally recommend an enduro tire setup on a 150/160 travel bike since the travel and geo will let you do big bike things on it.
Ive never had more than 100mm on any of my bikes and I seem to be going as fast as anyone else. I prefer light and fast to heavy and more sus. On the trails I ride its more than enough. Im actually building a Sworks epic frame up that only has 95mm rear travel.
Steep head angles dont bother me either. Ive been riding 33 years so im used to it.
Spectral 29 is a pure enduro bike, Spectral 125 and Neuron are trail bikes ;)
As someone who rides an enduro bike and has previously owned an Ibis Ripmo and a trail bike before that, no a 150 travel bike is not an enduro bike. 150 travel is usually called "All Mountain" as they kinda fit between trail and enduro. Once the speeds come up even that 10mm difference in travel between a 150/160 bike and a 160/170 bike becomes very apparent. The enduro bike is just on another level in terms of stability and ability to carry speed, they also tend to corner better than trail/AM bikes. At slow speeds though, the enduro bike might feel a little lifeless.
If you consider things from purely Enduro racing, sure, however for most users it's not a trail bike, it is even listed under the enduro category on the website.
Neil's riding is so smooth and dialled its like a dolphin mated with a clock and the offspring was bought up by a ballerina
I agrée about buying for what you want to be riding. I should probably have gotten a long travel, full sus XC bike rather tu an a trail bike, but I love riding my trail bike so much and I can take it on everything I want to ride. Seem to be the conclusion of Neil’s video really is, you are fastest on what you are most confident on !
I take my Enduro bike to the Swiss Alps, but for the local hills at home I take my hardtail. Enduro bike is totally over biked for the local trails and the soft compound tires suck the life out of me on the uphill 😆
Awesome skills my friend!
I'm just happy to see a GMBN video where the presenter is wearing protective gear appropriate for the terrain being ridden, rather than the bike they're on.
Most people are overbiked at the parks, nobody really wants to face the fact they’d be more efficient on a hardtail down the green runs.
As an older rider, I chose to go with something that would protect my joints with a smoother ride. I went with 160/140 on the analog bike and 150/150 on the ebike. I ride techy trails, bike parks, and pump tracks. I'm just starting to get a little air and doing small drops. The analog weighs 34 lbs and the ebike weighs 50 lbs. I've had lighter bikes. But, I don't mind the extra weight versus less suspension.
Makes me glad I "overbiked" and bought the Polygon N7 this Christmas as a beginner. I was worried I would enjoy the T8 more when I made the purchase (I definitely enjoy the paint more on the T8). So far I like the N7 though, just need to get more confident and in better shape to start tackling the uphills so I can have some fun on the downhills. Also very hard to compare them when I've never touched a T8.
I just bought a manitou mezzer so I guess I'll be able to easily figure it out!
Not much, mine is 120 rear 130 front, and it handles everything just fine, including double black downhill bike park tracks, suspension travel along with head angle has mostly become a sales pitch by manufacturers to try and convince people to buy new bikes.
Exactly! That’s a trail bike , not an enduro light!
@@rubberside3969 i think it just comes down to riding style. if you like to ride slow and pick your way through stuff it doesnt matter, but those things start to become very noticeable when youre blasting through chunk
@@sam61480 Depends on the trails too. You can defintiely pick your way down a double black DH track, if the trail can be ridden that slowly. Example, in Moab you can ride the double black trail Captain Ahab on pretty much anything since it's mostly super grippy slickrock which can be ridden as slow as you like. Try that on Top of the World in Whistler and you're going off a cliff, Whistler rock is not grippy at all and you MUST go fast down rocky sections in Whistler or you're going to end up in a slide and crashing.
Fun wins out over what the clock says unless racing. Personally I prefer the extra margin a DH bike gives me.
This needs to be redone on a trail that isn't shuttled, I saw almost no pedaling.
What I've been learning is that being over biked or underbiked sucks. Having the right bike for the job is where it's at. A 2 bike quiver with a short travel trail and enduro bike is where it's at.
I would say enduro and dh bike would be the best. Like canyon strive and sender duo. 😂
I ride my aluminum 27.5 spectral EVERYWHERE and I absolutely love it. But It’s more of an enduro bike then trail bike for sure.
Overbiked all the way for me! It gives you a bit of room for error, it you do go off line and take a big compression you’ve got the travel to take the hit if you’ve got less travel your going to feel it! My bikes saved me countless times!😂
Underbiked HT all day. Pain is gain lol
Les Gets with my HT, some people just shook their heads in disbelief 😅
I too hate having ankles
I’m mostly on a full 29er trail bike with 150/160 and 63.5 head angle. I feel like it’s the sweet spot for pretty much all terrain. My e bike is a mullet 140/160 with 65 head angle which surprisingly feels almost identical. Only the front wheel is slightly more temperamental on high speed flow trails, meaning more attention to weight distribution is needed. But it works really well on steep tech and jumps.
If the bike is fitted for me I would definitely go with more suspension travel than not !
I went through a lot of bikes when I first started, something like 6 in 2 years. Everything from a cross country to a GT Fury DH. Multiple reasons why, mostly a lack of knowledge. However what I learnt was that the downhill bike gave me confidence to try obstacles that I never would have looked at on a cross country. It was massively overkill in hindsight, but it bought confidence. I’ve settled on a Specialized Levo SL enduro with Fox 38s (180mm travel) which still gives me a huge amount of confidence in the bike, but a more nimble and versatile bike over a DH especially. I went ebike because I had a baby and can’t maintain my fitness like I used to. 😂
150mm fork with 35 or 36 mm stanchions and a 140 mm rear is my sweet spot for a trail bike. Put some better tires on the Spectral and i bet the times are the same as the enduro bike.
I bought a pivot trail 429 this year and then demoed a pivot shadowcat a few months later. The cat climbed just as well as the 429 but is better downhill with more suspension travel. So if the bigger suspension bikes can climb as well as the shorter travel bikes, why would anyone want the shorter travel bike?
Go demo a Firebird, then wonder why you even bothered getting the trail 429 (go down 1 frame size though, Firebird runs big). The Firebird legit pedals better than the trail 429, despite being an enduro bike. My take on the Trail 429 was the geo and front end loves writing checks the rear suspension can't cash, really felt like the front end of an aggressive trail bike and the back end of an XC bike.
@@mrvwbug4423 ya. I would agree with that. I’m in Minnesota so I really don’t need a bigger travel bike is what i thought but now it’s like “why not though” if it pedals as efficiently
I am riding a 160/160 Enduro Bike but with relatively fast rolling tires. Currently on trail casing Vittoria Martello (fr) Aggaro (re). Guess you could say the bike is undertired ;) For how I use it I find that´s a pretty good compromise though. Normally riding a mix of longer distance touring on natural trails /singletrack for which a short travel trail bike would be more appropriate and a good bit of bikepark where the extra suspension travel and burlier frame are nice for jumps and drops but the trails are mostly hardpack. I am giving up a bit of all out grip but with the faster rolling tires I don´t find much difference in terms of efficiency compared to a shorter travel bike.
gotta do the uphill climbing times!!!!
I ended up overbiked. I had 8 years without riding (even then I'd had that bike for years) then decided to get back into it. Discovered I didn't know what I was looking at. After asking around settled on a norco torrent (150mm hardtail). Found that on the tracks near me with the people I ride with, that is too much bike, so ended up buying an XC bike, which I love and suits me most of the time. If I could do over I'd probably buy a 120 or 130mm travel bike instead.
In theory this all holds up enough, but I have both a short travel trail bike and then a kind of medium travel Enduro bike. The ladder has industry. Non-wheels is fully carbon has a good drivetrain, has great suspension. It's hard not to ride my favorite bike even if it is a little much for the trails
Spectral at 160/150 underbiked trail? Figured itd be more 150/140 like you see on most trail bikes currently.
I used to think 160 is sweet spot, but since getting myself a 180 enduro bike I love how plush it feels.
comes down to the individual bike too. My current bike is 160/170 travel and feels more plush than some bigger bikes I've ridden. Though that comes down to a suspension setup that works particularly well for heavy riders, the back end has 42% progression curve which lets me run the shock quite linear (I'm 250lbs and am running zero spacers in the X2 for normal trails and only 1 spacer for bike park) while still having good bottom out resistance.
This was a really cool video, and I think it made great points and I took a lot away from it. I would agree with the rest of the comments that a 150/160 is not really "short travel" and maybe the spectral 125 would have been a better comparison.
i ride now way overbuilt dh bike but the one i always dreamt of and couldnt afford it earlier when i was more fit for that sport. i dont regret buying it since its way more comfy then my previous bike but i fear im being laughed at riding such a great bike the way i do. i try to tell myself that noone should be shamed for trying what they dreamt of as long as its doing no harm to anyone. i had a pretty bad crash some time ago and still recovering from trauma and the dream bike i have now is giving me courage and 'insurance' to train and 'git good'. one other point is that as long as you enjoy your bike does it matter if you are a bit slower than others? chill, have fun, stay safe and appreciate all bikes : )
Interesting subject, even after almost 30 years practicing mtb. I personaly have often been overbiked. Last example was my Rocky Altitude. I felt confident but after 3 hours riding with my friends, I was always exhausted, My actual bike is an Orange Stage Evo, just a 130/120 travel. But I really prefer this one. It is much more dynamic, so I am less tired during long rides. And when I go in the mountains, I still have plenty of sensentions. So my advise will be: Buy the good bike for your local trails, not for those you ride twice a year.
I was hoping to see a gravel bike thrown into the test haha 💀
Are you trying to send Neil to hospital haha
Sort of in the realm of Ferrari, Porche, or Corvette.
Cars for the track, used on public roads, similarly some mountain bikes are done up, great forks, awesome suspension and are only utilized for gravel trails.
However, nice to know there is the capability for knarly adventures should the opportunity arrive, or one travels to some exotic bike terrain.
Cheers!
160/150 is short travel? I think you need to redo this one with a real short travel bike, something around 140/130
150/160 for underbiked? Lol. That’s an all mountain bike- should be able to handle that trail and more just fine. I know, it’s what I ride. Would like to have seen a 120/130 bike for the underbiked bike- something like the Ibis Ripley or SC Tallboy. Because IMO geo and the linkage is so much more important than just amount of travel. Longer, slacker, tougher components (like a 36 or Lyric) with a linkage that doesn’t have a quick harsh bottom out on a shorter travel bike will let that bike go much bigger. Likewise, the opposite on a longer travel bike is still gonna feel sketch at 35 mph through gnar. And since most bikes are built with short seat tubes you can size up or down to get your preferred geo on a bike with any amount of travel, so you really can build exactly the bike you want. Even two of the same model bikes will feel different and handle different stuff better depending on how they are built.
I think we all overbike at the beginning, then when we realise we’re not world champions, we realise we’ve actually overbiked… personally I think underbiking helps you progress more quickly.
It can depend where you are in your biking journey too, you might go bigger as a newer rider fot the stability, and the longevity of use in a bike as you learn. Like getting a school sweater 2 sizes too big... You can grow into it ;) still a big purchase getting a bike and this was certainly something I considered and don't regret it at all.
the ideal travel to me is 170 front and 160 rear for what I do and ride
I find myself riding my Commencal Tempo more than my Stumpy Evo. It makes the more mundane trails way more interesting
Neil now has 3 bikes to wash. Must be good being GMBN presenter in England.
Jumped on a 150/140mm trail bike a couple of years ago and was amazed how capable it was compared to my HT with no dropper. Didn't think I was over or under biked at any point made everything feel easy and gave me room for progression and try increasingly tough things. After these couple of years I'm now faster and harder on the bike and I'm starting to feel under biked. Needed more travel for the hits, slacker steering to reduce the nervousness on higher speeds, etc. I'm guessing the kind of bike you need should be appropriate to your skill level but allow a bit of room for progression.
Neil gets it
i've thought about getting a slopestyle bike for my intermediate riding where i want a bit more than a hardtail but not quite a "real" full sus. Even my enduro is just an over-built trail bike (140/140)
Slopestyle bikes are kinda niche though. Maybe worth it if you spend all day on jump lines, not great for riding trails.
First of all, I'm 54, and bones don't mend as quick as they do in your twenties.
I've just bought a YT Izzo, which many would consider to be underbiked. I think it will be a whole lotta fun, without the potential consequences of getting it wrong.
In my 30's, I had an MGB GT. Going 60 miles an hour was living on the edge, way more so than going 120 in an Audi 10 years later.
That's why I prefer to underbike...
I'd love to see a Jones LWB in a comparison like this, but mostly just to see where it would fall. While having no suspension they do surprisingly well in technical terrain and single track - far better than you'd expect for such a rigid bike. Not saying it would win any of these categories. Honestly I am just curious in an apple to apples comparison.
I do literally EVERYTHING with my aggressive hardtail that’s got 160 up front
When I got my first “real” bike, it was a 2018 Hightower (specifically after watching the gmbn tech episode that featured it). I didn’t think I’d ever be able to jump, drop, or ride anything chunky, even though I wanted to. After only a year, I tried my hand at a few downhill tracks and quickly realized how underbiked I was. A little over a year ago, I picked up a 2018 yt Capra and it’s made all the difference on dh days. I chose not to go with a full dh bike though because I don’t think I’ll ever be able to jump or drop anything big enough, or ride anything chunky enough to need it, even though I want to….. wait a sec, did that last bit sound familiar?
Orbea bikes have a good pedaling platform and are usually fast therefore. Occam sl/LT vs spectral 125 PLZ.
I’m getting old but went the other way. I used to ride the big travel enduro bikes, then went to the Spectral and now I’ve gone even smaller on the Reactor. Just got tired of peddling big bikes around and like the fast and fun days
Spectral “short travel”???!! I’m fairly sure Ritchie Rude rode a Yeti SB150 on the EWS…fairly sure he won a few too! Wouldn’t necessarily call a 150mm travel bike “short travel”…unless of course the frames of reference have shifted (appreciate Yeti now have the SB160 replacing the SB150)…
Is it “marketing”? I say just ride what works for you!!
The giant slacked out sled bikes don't win EWS/EDR races, but only pros are going to be able to push a smaller bike THAT hard on that type of terrain. The giant slack bikes let us mere mortals ride really rowdy trails with more confidence and less chance of ending up in hospital.
I like under biking so hardtail with 140 fork 29er plus tires n 62 head tube angle
I think you need to expand this. Take the same three bikes and do a standard trail ride, throw in some uphills. Then do all three on a downhill trail, safely.
I got an enduro bike. It works for just about everything and I'm not racing anybody ever
Spot on
My personal thought:
I love my enduro bike and wouldn't give it up for any money in the world ( Custom Nomad V4 )! Nevertheless, I have to and want to say that even trail bikes are so incredibly capable. With just a few adjustments and tweaks, you can build yourself a "mini enduro". Especially when it comes to suspension settings and tyre choice, you can create so much support even for very rough trails. And 150 mm of suspension travel is in no way "short travel". What is certain, however, is that an enduro bike has even more reserves and is therefore more forgiving of riding errors. But I think that for the masses, a well-built trail bike is sufficient overall, as the range of use can be so widely diversified.
On the other hand, you can see (excuse the expression) how pointless a downhill bike is these days.
But hey, the bottom line is that we all want to have as much fun as possible on the trails!
It also comes down to how the kinematics of the bike favor certain riding styles. To use other SC bikes for an example, the Hightower is a wonderfully poppy and playful rowdy trail bike, but would be out of its element being a "mini enduro" bike. For comparison the Transition Sentinel is the very definition of a "mini enduro" bike, it's much more of a stable, planted speed demon. The Ibis Ripmo sort of splits the difference, but leans more towards the enduro side and feels more sorted doing big bike things than the Hightower, the Ripmo that I rode for 3 years was set up like a mini-enduro and it didn't do half bad in that setup. All 3 bikes fall into that 150 travel class.
I rock under or over-biked with a rigid ss or a 200/165 freeride machine. Its fun to be spicy on xc to enduro on the ss XD
Also bike travel depends on the style of riding of the rider. Some guys might be more smooth riding down and others might like to play more with the bike and ride the same trails demanding that extra of the bike on purpose. My best friend, rides a 29" hardtail with 140 mm in the same trails we ride together, and we're pretty much equally fast. He rides pretty smooth and stable, Myself on the other hand, i ride a 27,5 170mm front-150mm back very aggressively and i am always popping out of roots, and rocks, doing gaps, and tacking the straightest lines through the trails that i can which ends up demanding more of my bike. Since i use all the travel and bike suspensions are properly set up to our weights. Have a nice day guys
That Rallon is such a sweet plow. If only they were a bit cheaper, though.
I like to be under biked a little. I ride 5010 cascade linked. It’s 140 front rear. 27.5 all around too
Really should have done a run on a hardtail. #ForScience 😂
Now you should do the same comparison on local pedals trails which is the he majority of riders would use it
the hair in intro!🤣
"average mountain bikers can be tempted to overbike and buy a bike for what they wish they were doing, not actually for what they are doing"
Man I really fell for this trap a few years ago. Now making peace with the fact that I have too much bike for our trails and considering saving up for an XC/ downcountry bike.
Whichever helps me bumble my way down the most bumbley.
Would LOVE to see you guys make a video comparing what you think are the top five 27.5 hard tails. Who’s with me? Really wish Trek kept the Roscoe a 27.5
Or maybe even your top 27.5 or mixed wheel HT’s (including Blake’s beloved Nukeproof Scout, of course) up against the new generation Roscoe with its 29’s. Would love a reason to pick up something other than another Roscoe for my new HT in spring. Enlighten us 🤘🏼
Wow I came to see if a 130 focus vam SL would be pushing it- didn’t realise 160 was considered short travel
Size does matter but it's mostly how you use it.
120mm is good for the stuff inride 130 to 140 is perfect
There is no travel except for downhill forks where too much front suspension is over biked