well for most simple physics where you assume everything is a particle and work with at most two dimensions, newtonian physics is more than enough, even in some profession relativity is irrelevant because, while an oversimplification of the natural world, newtonian physics still accurately desribe most of our day-to-day lives.
Postermaestro I'm not a scientist tho i really don't understand the newton's law calculating who is attracting who really...... object A attracts object B, what happens? they get closer right? so isn't the gravity force the combined attraction of A and B? i mean we are in space talking about planets and so who's the static parameter: if i pull someone, if i'm heavier, that someone will get moved toward me, or instead i'll be pulled to that person. That notion is only mesurable since we have the static ground to compare who moved toward who, if you remove the ground, we just get closer and on that no matter who pulled harder since the link between us it the pulling force that was enough to counter our combined inertia... or i just didn't got it ^^'
Jack Jack if you and a friend were sitting in separate rafts floating in water holding opposite end of a rope and pulled the rope, you would both move and meet near the middle of where you started. If ten people joined your friends and you pulled the rope, you would move more than them but they would move toward you a some. In all cases, the tension on both ends of the rope would be equal. You are pulling with the same force that you are being pulled.
Mark Daniel indeed and in that case: what would happen if they (10) were just holding the rope and not pulling and i was pulling it alone? it will for sure result of me getting closer to their spot but they would also move but all of that in slow rate, what i'm trying to poit at is: How could you say the pulling force is from who or who? the generator of that force is a separate thing from the pulling force appliance itself cause if i genenrate 50% of it and the 10 guys in front would each generate 5% it would result 100% for all of us so for my understanding the pulling force applied is one single pulling force applied equaly to 2 masses. Another question is: As we know a chopper can't move faster than his fan's rolling speed, if it goes 10km/h while it's fan at the edge rotates at 10km/h as well, means one side will travel 20km (opposing wind from speed 10km/h + it's own speed 10km/h) and other will stay static 0km/h (10km/h from moving speed - 10km/h of own backward movement) so now that we are aware that moving around an already moving corp creates such variations, how does the moon follows earth while at a point the inertia of both is down while moon crossing earth's path from front and increased while the moon is crossing from behind? there is more than just gravity and it's not only pulling, i'm wondering if the gravity stream itself can kind of stretch and retract without loosing any force or if the loss from one move isn't increasing another field we don't know yet wich will bend those 2 masses to an almost regular distance, since we can keep track of both earth and moon's paths, i see it more as 2 corps bound to an elastic rope.
BlacksUnited - Erika. I agree erika, women with small chests like yours are way less attractive than women with bigger chests.Thank you for bringing up this topic. p.s. your channel name is racist.
Entirely agreed - however this one felt more towards the clicktrap end of the scale than the perfect legitbait. Not entirely sure I ended the video feeling as satisfied as his more recent videos - but that figures, considering it's a decade old 😊
Yeah I'll grant him that because he still has this innocent curiousity when he tries these things plus I don't feel duped because he gives me a lot back by shamelessly grabbing my attention like that so it's a double win (and it feels more like a running gag by now actually). And last but not least, his honest intend. You just know that he doesn't do that to grab money, he really does this to spread his enthusiasm for science, to enrich others and not just himself. So it makes me chuckle how this overambitious squirrel is now hacking itself through every of his videos to spread the love. It's contagious. And it also puts the true clickbaiter to shame as he beats them in their own game which forces them to become better or fade into unimportance again. It's just perfect on so many levels.
As a teacher I was super proud of that guy who stopped to think about what he said initially and started working it out... Seriously though, excellent explanation, thank you - will be using this with my classes.
halowaffles James Whistler "But not really believe Newton's Third Law in their core, did they really feel it in their spleen?" ...... "Can you feel Newton's Third Law in your spleen now?" "It should settle in side you, and become, a part of you."
RIP Benny Harvey. My dear friend interviewed in this video. So sad to see him so young ten years ago. He was a brilliant force that the moon couldn’t equal.
+Mareritt Which scientificly speaking is actually not completely correct. C is the speed of causality, but light just happens to travel at that speed (or to be exact: everything with no mass and no forces acting on it moves at c).
I'd love to see you interview some engineering and science first year students from college about this. In India, people choose to become engineers and doctors because of the cred and money it earns them (and also due to lots of parental pressure) and not because they really love the field they're a part of and it's very common to see such mistakes happening there among engineering students as well unless, ofc, they memorised a question that relates to the exact same problem
if you are indian then i can say you are one of those least indians who dont hide the facts and say it as it is. i saw many indians always trying to indian is that or what not.but never saw an indian comment saying that this is wrong with indians ppl or country as a whole...and for speaking the truth you are truly the goat
I think it would've tied it up nicely to finish the ending by adding that now with equal forces acting on the masses, the smaller one accelerates more because it has smaller mass.
TheChemistryShack ***** Loki Dunn gamer4370 Miguel Blanco i was thinking some thing else i have seen a lot of his video and they have some changes this is a big change the letter c but if you look closer to some other videos you will see letters and numbers and the question is... Is this a code? i know this is going to be crazy but... sorry... never-mind i don't know ..
If you put a rubber band (or a piece of elastic chord or whatever) around two objects, the pull towards each other is obviously equal. If the objects are the same mass (two identical marbles) they'll move towards each other at the same speed. If you have one huge marble and one smaller one, the bigger one will still move but slower than the smaller one, because of inertia. A neat way to visualize the concept of gravity and Newton's 3rd law.
When I taught physics, the 3rd law was by far the hardest area for removing student's preconceived notions. You just pointed one of them out. The other is that they think that the matching force for my weight, when I'm standing on a floor, is the floor pushing up on me. The first Khan Academy video on N3 even had this wrong, and 10 years later that video is still up. And everybody argued fiercely with me when I tried to explain that the video was wrong.
Or just realize that when you stand an the scale an measure your weight on Planet Earth, that you'd get the same amount as if you flipped the scale upside down and measured the weight of Earth on Planet You.
Haha I love this as a way of thinking about it. It also helps explain how your measly 100-200lbs or so is (mostly) inconsequential to the earth, which is so much more massive and has so much more inertia to overcome to be moved by you.
@@sirewangpho5146 You standing normally on a scale and you standing on a scale which is upside-down ,both show the same weight. Since weight is just another way of saying force, you exert same force on earth as the earth exerts on you. Sry if I made no sense
Jesus Christ... Just got this recommended So young, so beautiful, so charming (and so shaved) I see now how you got your first 9 million subscribers Through hard work and dedication ofcourse.
Officer: do you know why I pulled you over? Driver: no, sir. Officer: you were driving incredibly under the speed limit. Driver: but, this is a 30mph zone, and I was driving at that spee- Officer: sir, do you not see the sign over there that clearly says "speed limit: c"? Driver: why does it say that? Officer: *BECAUSE YOU NEED TO FEEL IT IN YOUR SPLEEN*
When it comes to gravity I think it is more intuitive for people to see F = ma in the form of F/m = a. That way it looks more like we are solving for a.
The only thing I learned from this video is even if people knew something and be aware of that knowledge at the time of being asked the relative question they could still lack understanding of the knowledge.
I really appreciate these videos more now after your video about what makes for good science content. Starting with a contradiction is a great way to get people really engaged in ways they'll remember.
I am learning physics for 2 years, down to quantom physics. But I must say I hadn't understood Newton's 3rd law ! This demonstration is perfect ! Thank you for that !!!! :)
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I know Newton's third law for 3 years now... I am just saying that my teacher didn't told us how to understand it. He just told us : "That's it !" and I've never been curious enough to understand it, so I accepted it. And about Quantum Physics : I think it is Niels Bohr or Rutherford who said that it seems complicated but the maths are pretty easy ! (and it is a bit true...)
Taxtro you kind of do. I can't imagine grasping quantum physics without understanding Newtons third law. In physics, the more advanced concepts require a basic understanding. It's like claiming to be a professional NFL quarterback without knowing how to throw a ball.
This can be easily seen from the fact that both the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force are directly proportional to the product of the masses and charges respectively.
Fresh Rock Papa-E I think one who's aware of the Third Law or the cause of the tide probably also at least have some basic knowledge about gravitational field bending light.
I think most of them probably didn't understand it because they didn't understand "force", which is a technical concept. If you substitute "acceleration", all their replies are accurate.
Yeah, and? Acceleration and force are two different things. That's like asking someone what color the grass is, and when they all answer 'blue', you come in and say, "Yeah, but if you replace "grass" with "sky", they all got it right. No, they didn't. They all got it wrong. He was referencing the FORCE; not ACCELERATION. Two different things!!! You said 'force' is a technical concept. Acceleration isn't?!!?? What are you talking about?
Good point that acceleration is also technical. It's just sort of silly to ask about misconceptions when the people he's asking don't even know what the words mean. I would have liked it better if he had asked something about their positions and speeds, which are "layman" concepts. (I'm finding it hard to come up with an example, because most of my examples depend on the reference frame)
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I wouldn't say acceleration and force are too different because actually as Newton states F=ma, they are very related. Also I think what Luke Palmer meant is that acceleration is easier to expireience in everyday life as compared to force which is a more abstract and difficult definition to imagine.
my favourite part is that he'd never make this same video nowadays. probably because of its relative simplicity. doesn't matter though, he deserves every view he (can) get(s)
I think it would have been easier to say that the forces are the same but due to (sigma) F=ma larger masses experience less acceleration if acted on by forces of the same magnitude.
Still doesn't make sense...1) would an amoeba pull on the sun with a force equal to the sun? 2) would a million amoebas each pull with the force of the sun therefore combined they're pulling with a total force of a million suns? 3) would an amoeba next to the sun have the same effect as a sun next to the sun? 4) if an amoeba pulls on the sun with an equal and opposite force, shouldn't the sun pull with the gravitational force of an amoeba?
Marino Hernandez 1) Yes, same force different acceleration 2) Yes 3) No, two suns pulling on each other exert a larger force. 4) Yes it does but ONLY on the amoeba. Again remember force and acceleration are different. They have the same force but because the sun is so massive it barely accelerated whereas the amoeba will accelerate much faster.
@@hopp2184 it still isn't clicking...#1 says the amoeba exerts sun-identical force that isn't enough to affect sun and #3 says an actual sun has a larger force...then #4 also seems contradictory because it says an amoeba-identical force by the sun would pull the amoeba (because the sun is massive) but #2 says that a combined force of a million suns (by a million amoebas) wouldn't pull on the sun as though there were an actual million suns
Marino Hernandez it’s great that you are curious and willing to understand! Think about it using Newton’s law of gravity: F = G * m1 * m2 / r^2 This law says that any two objects exert the same gravitational FORCE on each other. However Force = mass * acceleration so objects with a larger mass have a smaller acceleration to “compensate” for the same force. Mathematically you can think that a=F/m So a larger mass means smaller acceleration but still same force. #1 This you seem to understand. Same force but different acceleration. #3 Newton’s law of gravity is F = G * m1 * m2 / r^2 If you increase the mass of one object then the force becomes larger on BOTH objects. So two suns attract at a greater gravitational force than one sun and one amoeba. But they might accelerate differently. #2/4 remember Newton’s law of gravity? In it is the term m1 * m2. If an amoeba has mass m1 and the sun has mass m2 then the mass of 1 million suns gives a different force than 1 million amoebas. I hope this has helped you :)
just remember f = ma. if anything my physics teacher tought me, is that every time we need to solve a new problem, just stick in f = ma and see what happens
For every action there has to be an equal and opposite reaction, but there's a little time delay between the action and reaction. And at higher frequency in electrical systems this small time delay makes the action and reaction go in the same direction and adds up the result. At higher frequencies, the reaction don't oppose the action, it supplements it and creates more energy than what is put in the system making it an overunity system.
I don’t think people misunderstood. People understand intuitively that the object with lower mass will orbit the object with the greater mass e.g the moon orbits the earth snd the earth orbits the sun. They would understand this as one object having greater inertia than the other despite the forces being equal with reference to F=ma. I.e to conserve F in F=ma the acceleration of the earth is much lower than the moon. They did not misunderstand, they just didn’t use the key word inertia.
I think the source of the misconception is from people projecting themselves to each location. Because their body would weigh less on the Moon compared to Earth, they apply the same relationship between the Moon and Earth. My students definitely do this and it can be a bit challenging to resolve the conflict.
Google Translate says you call it the σπλήνα, in Greek. Not surprised, it is roughly a cognate with the English word. Probably originally a word in Greek.
Yes, changing the thumbnail and title does increase your CTR and impressions. Watching a video made 10 years ago. Guess you cracked the algorithm:)
This is also my conclusion.
LMAO
Iwas literally thinking the same thing xD
So priceless
skinny-tasium lol
@@TheWilliamSnfrd he is so young =)
RUclips recommends me this video after a complete decade.
me too
same xD
Same lol
I'd say this is the main reason YT is the best at its game
Same. It was a shock seeing him so young.
he's so young
Stephen Fapsalot I’m glad he brought the beard back lol
+
He's even younger...
This gets weirder the more time passes
@@thekingoffailure9967 he's even more young...
"any two objects will have the same gravitational force towards each other"
Next Up: Why Gravity is NOT a Force
That was what i was thinking lol
well for most simple physics where you assume everything is a particle and work with at most two dimensions, newtonian physics is more than enough, even in some profession relativity is irrelevant because, while an oversimplification of the natural world, newtonian physics still accurately desribe most of our day-to-day lives.
@@jthoward Still, not a force
@@eeronat You’re not wrong, it’s just that in most cases, and pretty much including this one, and the difference is unimportant
Yeah, that was my problem with this video. Sabine Hossenfelder would like a word.
And that's why size doesn't matter boys. It's all about the force..
Postermaestro NAILED IT !!
Postermaestro I'm not a scientist tho i really don't understand the newton's law calculating who is attracting who really...... object A attracts object B, what happens? they get closer right? so isn't the gravity force the combined attraction of A and B? i mean we are in space talking about planets and so who's the static parameter: if i pull someone, if i'm heavier, that someone will get moved toward me, or instead i'll be pulled to that person. That notion is only mesurable since we have the static ground to compare who moved toward who, if you remove the ground, we just get closer and on that no matter who pulled harder since the link between us it the pulling force that was enough to counter our combined inertia... or i just didn't got it ^^'
Jack Jack if you and a friend were sitting in separate rafts floating in water holding opposite end of a rope and pulled the rope, you would both move and meet near the middle of where you started. If ten people joined your friends and you pulled the rope, you would move more than them but they would move toward you a some.
In all cases, the tension on both ends of the rope would be equal. You are pulling with the same force that you are being pulled.
Mark Daniel indeed and in that case: what would happen if they (10) were just holding the rope and not pulling and i was pulling it alone? it will for sure result of me getting closer to their spot but they would also move but all of that in slow rate, what i'm trying to poit at is: How could you say the pulling force is from who or who? the generator of that force is a separate thing from the pulling force appliance itself cause if i genenrate 50% of it and the 10 guys in front would each generate 5% it would result 100% for all of us so for my understanding the pulling force applied is one single pulling force applied equaly to 2 masses.
Another question is: As we know a chopper can't move faster than his fan's rolling speed, if it goes 10km/h while it's fan at the edge rotates at 10km/h as well, means one side will travel 20km (opposing wind from speed 10km/h + it's own speed 10km/h) and other will stay static 0km/h (10km/h from moving speed - 10km/h of own backward movement) so now that we are aware that moving around an already moving corp creates such variations, how does the moon follows earth while at a point the inertia of both is down while moon crossing earth's path from front and increased while the moon is crossing from behind? there is more than just gravity and it's not only pulling, i'm wondering if the gravity stream itself can kind of stretch and retract without loosing any force or if the loss from one move isn't increasing another field we don't know yet wich will bend those 2 masses to an almost regular distance, since we can keep track of both earth and moon's paths, i see it more as 2 corps bound to an elastic rope.
BlacksUnited - Erika. I agree erika, women with small chests like yours are way less attractive than women with bigger chests.Thank you for bringing up this topic.
p.s. your channel name is racist.
DID YOU FEEL NEWTON INSIDE YOUR SPLEEN!?!?!?!?
Cringe
Nope. I didn't ;-;
Yes. It's now exerting the same gravitational attraction as the rest of me.
nope
Yes. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
He’s literally farming views at this point, after he’s figured out this whole RUclips algorithm. To be quite frank though, he deserves more views
I guess so
Truuuuuuuue
Entirely agreed - however this one felt more towards the clicktrap end of the scale than the perfect legitbait. Not entirely sure I ended the video feeling as satisfied as his more recent videos - but that figures, considering it's a decade old 😊
Agree. Think even he knows this is not the best video about Newton ever. Great to watch young Derek, though!
Yeah I'll grant him that because he still has this innocent curiousity when he tries these things plus I don't feel duped because he gives me a lot back by shamelessly grabbing my attention like that so it's a double win (and it feels more like a running gag by now actually).
And last but not least, his honest intend.
You just know that he doesn't do that to grab money, he really does this to spread his enthusiasm for science, to enrich others and not just himself. So it makes me chuckle how this overambitious squirrel is now hacking itself through every of his videos to spread the love. It's contagious.
And it also puts the true clickbaiter to shame as he beats them in their own game which forces them to become better or fade into unimportance again. It's just perfect on so many levels.
Amazingly, even after all these years since Derek posted this video, Newton’s laws still hold - I can feel it in my spleen!
That's concerning from a medical point of view
Amazingly even after all these years since Derek posted this video, I still dont understand Newtons third law - I cant feel it in my spleen!
@@wilforddraper1894 thats assuring from a medical point of view
I feel that the gravitational force on my spleen does indeed match its force on the Earth.
Amazingly, even after all these years since Newton wrote this law, it still holds - I can feel it in my spleen!
Speed limit C only applies in Germany
And Montana.
Even c is still finite compared to no speed limit in Germany
@@gerryakbar haha
What is speed Limit C? Is it a joke? Sorry i dont get it, maybe cause i am german...
@@alexanderschulz2100 c is the speed of light
3:07 "speedlimit: c"
well, that's a bit much don't you think?
I noticed it tooo is it on purpose
Jaswant Gunaseelan - yes, c is the speed of light, which is the speed limit of the universe.
EnviedShark didn't think that
I noticed it too
Noticed it at the begining of the video
0:29 "The moon pulls on the earth too. It affects the tides... and women."
I was not expecting that. I LOL'd.
I assume she’s referencing the moon cycles and mensuration link thing, which I think might be a myth, either way I don’t think it’s to do with gravity
Month, moon, menstruation - they're surely all related...
@@exessex3522 everything is connected
@Trance - 009 Sound System Dreamscape lol i was thinking that too lmfao
He married her
Derek really took that "baity titles for older videos" thing to a whole new level
As a teacher I was super proud of that guy who stopped to think about what he said initially and started working it out... Seriously though, excellent explanation, thank you - will be using this with my classes.
"Did they really feel it in their spleen?"
*-Veritasium 2011*
2011 ok?
Nominated best spleen play of 2011
@@ZeroOneInfinity hmmm 2 lettered word..
@@ZeroOneInfinity Man spleening?
@@danielculver2209 By the Spleenwriters Guild
"Do you know why I pulled you over, today?"
"Probably because I was going D in a C zone, officer"
halowaffles : Not bad.
halowaffles James Whistler
"But not really believe Newton's Third Law in their core, did they really feel it in their spleen?"
......
"Can you feel Newton's Third Law in your spleen now?"
"It should settle in side you, and become, a part of you."
halowaffles i dont get it
halowaffles oh nevermind haha that was good.
+halowaffles Love it lol. Noticed it too
RIP Benny Harvey. My dear friend interviewed in this video. So sad to see him so young ten years ago. He was a brilliant force that the moon couldn’t equal.
Wow that's sad. I'm sorry for your - and it sounds like all of ours - loss.
Which one is he?
Gone but not forgotten
I'm so glad this is joke is still alive
Killing your friend for youtube likes SeemsGood
Are you feeling it now, Mr. Krabs?
Are you... feeling it?
Napoleon Not enough force
Napoleon Do you smell it?
Multimedia message (mr krabs.3gp)
It's young Derek O my god
josh m : I could watch him all day.
yea ...
yeah...
@@jameswhistler968 Ha gayyyy.
I'm gonna copystrike u bc u should've linked to my principia
Nice one
Hey wait! He gave you credit, didn’t he?
Return to your bible work, Newtie :)
Lol
What's your 4th law?
So I guess we're really really pushing into this "retitling" territory. It's interesting!
I love how the speed limit is the speed of light.
+Mareritt Which scientificly speaking is actually not completely correct. C is the speed of causality, but light just happens to travel at that speed (or to be exact: everything with no mass and no forces acting on it moves at c).
@@mariusmuller2420 nerd
@@brauliocardenas1227 checkmate
@@mariusmuller2420 you're being pedantic for no reason
@@brauliocardenas1227 You just watched a video titled: "Best Film on Newton's Third Law. Ever.
"... aren't we all nerds here?
Knowing true meaning of NEWTON'S THIRD LAW OF MOTION only after watching this.I AM FEELING IT IN MY SPLEEN, THANK U. A LOT❤️
Please don't shave. Ever.
hahaha exactly
From 25 y.o. to 14 y.o.
But he looks younger!
he is younger check the date
He looks like a boy band reject without the beard. If you have heard him sing in another video, it just confirms it.
Look how young you are! You have aged wonderfully Derek. Thank you for everything you have given us and continue to give us.
I'd love to see you interview some engineering and science first year students from college about this.
In India, people choose to become engineers and doctors because of the cred and money it earns them (and also due to lots of parental pressure) and not because they really love the field they're a part of and it's very common to see such mistakes happening there among engineering students as well unless, ofc, they memorised a question that relates to the exact same problem
This video was not shot in india kiddo😂
You probably never studied in IIT KGP bro 😁
@@hemarawat2637 n u probably haven't met much people bro
if you are indian then i can say you are one of those least indians who dont hide the facts and say it as it is. i saw many indians always trying to indian is that or what not.but never saw an indian comment saying that this is wrong with indians ppl or country as a whole...and for speaking the truth you are truly the goat
Nobody :
RUclips : yeah boi, this video got 8 years old let's recommend this to everyone
Watching it by the end of 2020, lol.
And again
And again 2021
Now 10
I don't feel comfortable placing Newton's third law in my spleen.
I think this is one of the best comments I've ever seen. I'm still laughing...
O yes i feel very comfortable.
And i've got no red hair!
I think it would've tied it up nicely to finish the ending by adding that now with equal forces acting on the masses, the smaller one accelerates more because it has smaller mass.
Thanks man, this finally helped me understand it
thank you!
Lol. Does anyone else notice the speed limit sign?
Yup!
Gosh that would be one hell of a fine for speeding on that rode
TheChemistryShack ***** Loki Dunn gamer4370 Miguel Blanco i was thinking some thing else i have seen a lot of his video and they have some changes this is a big change the letter c but if you look closer to some other videos you will see letters and numbers and the question is... Is this a code? i know this is going to be crazy but... sorry... never-mind i don't know ..
TheChemistryShack Actually, they couldn´t even fine the photons!
Yeah!
If you put a rubber band (or a piece of elastic chord or whatever) around two objects, the pull towards each other is obviously equal. If the objects are the same mass (two identical marbles) they'll move towards each other at the same speed. If you have one huge marble and one smaller one, the bigger one will still move but slower than the smaller one, because of inertia.
A neat way to visualize the concept of gravity and Newton's 3rd law.
This is more interesting than the video 😊
"Because it's a greater mess, and a greater mess equals more force?"
Sounds like my mom.
+Vensey Ness yor mom does same forze on earth as aerth on her!11
Hi from the future
Here, after 13 years Derek looks really different and the quality of his content is awesome
The spleen analogy was kinda weird. Glad you're past all that now.
You and 118 others might wanna look up the definition of analogy
SensualCream why
lol I agree the spleen thing was kinda creepy
yeah how is that an analogy
I felt that newton law in my liver
Newton's Third Law = If you want to get somewhere, you've gotta leave something behind.
Actually, if you want to change where you're going.
I THOUGHT WE HAD ENOUGH RESOURCES FOR THE BOTH OF US
every level of astraction you add to NTL will guarantee make it more confusing
*We agreed Amelia... 90%*
The movie is cool but that's not what Newton's third law is about... Overdramatization
Therapist: "Shaved Veritasium doesn't exist. He can't hurt you"
Shaved Veritasium:
When I taught physics, the 3rd law was by far the hardest area for removing student's preconceived notions. You just pointed one of them out. The other is that they think that the matching force for my weight, when I'm standing on a floor, is the floor pushing up on me. The first Khan Academy video on N3 even had this wrong, and 10 years later that video is still up. And everybody argued fiercely with me when I tried to explain that the video was wrong.
true
Damn, we need to comment bomb that video. Khan Academy is taken to be the work of God by many.
I don't know why this was recommended to me in 2021 but I love it.
Is it bad I laughed at the speed limit sign?
Bluefire9911 no its good that you know that c=speed of light
Bluefire9911 Oh yeah it was hilarious.
What's wrong with it? All I see is 25
Oh I get it now, it got changed at the end
Your spleen is one of the only organs that dose not have a pain center, It's imposible to feel anything there
I don't think that's true. Possibly only the capsule of the spleen has pain sensation. Sickle cell kids get painful splenic crises.
Pedant 🥳😊
does*
The spleen is the center for our oldest awareness, much much much older than the mind, you feel everything that keeps you alive in there =)
Or just realize that when you stand an the scale an measure your weight on Planet Earth, that you'd get the same amount as if you flipped the scale upside down and measured the weight of Earth on Planet You.
Woah..
Mind blown 👀🙆♂️
Haha I love this as a way of thinking about it. It also helps explain how your measly 100-200lbs or so is (mostly) inconsequential to the earth, which is so much more massive and has so much more inertia to overcome to be moved by you.
I didnt get it
@@sirewangpho5146 You standing normally on a scale and you standing on a scale which is upside-down ,both show the same weight.
Since weight is just another way of saying force, you exert same force on earth as the earth exerts on you.
Sry if I made no sense
Jesus Christ...
Just got this recommended
So young, so beautiful, so charming (and so shaved)
I see now how you got your first 9 million subscribers
Through hard work and dedication ofcourse.
Seem like Derick clickbaiting skill to applease youtube algorithm is doing well.
This is really helpful to me though.
He went from small2 concepts to really bigger ones inspiring to be someone like him.
August 2021 recommended - hi everyone else! Hope you’re doing well and can feel it in your spleen
I do in fact feel Newton's third law in my spleen
These old videos sure hit different, huh?
he changed the title and thumbnail so all of them surfaced xD youtube third law
@@somefreshbread they hit right in the spleen
Speed limit: c.
Best joke I've heard all week XD
W8 are you being sarcastic??
+(:Turretshooter500:) Am I?
+WindyDelcarlo: Using my inference and deduction skills, my instinct says that you are being sarcastic.
+(:Turretshooter500:) well, do you think I actually think I am? ;)
No one can break this law! No really, they literally can't
*_THE SPEED LIMIT_*
did anyone notice that the speed limit is c out there ?
Yesss.
I’m watching this 13 years after the release. What a difference a decade+ makes. Love your videos. Thanks.
Officer: do you know why I pulled you over?
Driver: no, sir.
Officer: you were driving incredibly under the speed limit.
Driver: but, this is a 30mph zone, and I was driving at that spee-
Officer: sir, do you not see the sign over there that clearly says "speed limit: c"?
Driver: why does it say that?
Officer: *BECAUSE YOU NEED TO FEEL IT IN YOUR SPLEEN*
I'm getting such a strong 2000s vibe from this. And I love it 😇
When it comes to gravity I think it is more intuitive for people to see F = ma in the form of F/m = a. That way it looks more like we are solving for a.
I remember watching this video 8 years ago. It made me love physics way too much that I became a mechanical engineer. No regrets. Old is Gold.
The only thing I learned from this video is even if people knew something and be aware of that knowledge at the time of being asked the relative question they could still lack understanding of the knowledge.
2:08-2:11 you forgot to change the speed limit
I really appreciate these videos more now after your video about what makes for good science content. Starting with a contradiction is a great way to get people really engaged in ways they'll remember.
Your ability to bring a ten year old video from yourself to the surface that I have never seen recommended before is amazing
I am learning physics for 2 years, down to quantom physics. But I must say I hadn't understood Newton's 3rd law !
This demonstration is perfect ! Thank you for that !!!! :)
MrPhitos I'm not sure how you could have become familiar with Quantum Physics without an understanding of Newton's Third Law!
Willoughby Krenzteinburg
I know Newton's third law for 3 years now...
I am just saying that my teacher didn't told us how to understand it. He just told us : "That's it !" and I've never been curious enough to understand it, so I accepted it.
And about Quantum Physics : I think it is Niels Bohr or Rutherford who said that it seems complicated but the maths are pretty easy ! (and it is a bit true...)
+Willoughby Krenzteinburg You don't need to rationalize any of it in order to work with it.
Taxtro you kind of do. I can't imagine grasping quantum physics without understanding Newtons third law. In physics, the more advanced concepts require a basic understanding. It's like claiming to be a professional NFL quarterback without knowing how to throw a ball.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg
No, it's knowing how to throw the ball, but not having a rationalization for why it flies the way it does.
I was playing baseball and got hit in the spleen. My spleen rebounded with an equal and opposite force.
That’s not true.
@Selvam Thiagarajan If it is not true, then Newton's Third Law is not true.
@@LucidDreamer54321 you have a point, I am all confused now.
@Selvam Thiagarajan So you are in your normal state of mind.
@@LucidDreamer54321 No I am normally not confused, just this instance only.
Derek really feels to his spleen that he can possibly increase the number of views significantly by changing the title and thumbnail.
Is 2021 long enough to call this a throwback
This can be easily seen from the fact that both the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force are directly proportional to the product of the masses and charges respectively.
You must make supplemental videos. Thanks for the info.
New thumbnail and title driving new viewers hey... Seems like Derek is updating the backlog.
Veritasium with no grey hair makes me uneasy
YESSSSSS. IT IS WITHOUT DOUBT. Thanks, veritasium
In terms of the gravitational field, the moon's is weaker than the Earth's. Probably that's where the confusion comes from.
Antonio Mariscal We know what you said ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Antonio Mariscal en conclusion. ¿el video tenia razón?
I don't think anyone that has this misconception has learnt about fields...
Fresh Rock Papa-E I think one who's aware of the Third Law or the cause of the tide probably also at least have some basic knowledge about gravitational field bending light.
@@kruth6663 That's Einstein's Spacetime, the Newtonian gravity they're studying doesn't include the bending of light.
my god, how old were you here? 12?
It was 2011, so he would be 28 years old :)
Somethings very young with you if you have a beard at the age of 12
Yeah, how about now?
HAHAHAHAHAHA
I think most of them probably didn't understand it because they didn't understand "force", which is a technical concept. If you substitute "acceleration", all their replies are accurate.
Yeah, and? Acceleration and force are two different things. That's like asking someone what color the grass is, and when they all answer 'blue', you come in and say, "Yeah, but if you replace "grass" with "sky", they all got it right.
No, they didn't. They all got it wrong. He was referencing the FORCE; not ACCELERATION. Two different things!!!
You said 'force' is a technical concept. Acceleration isn't?!!?? What are you talking about?
Good point that acceleration is also technical. It's just sort of silly to ask about misconceptions when the people he's asking don't even know what the words mean.
I would have liked it better if he had asked something about their positions and speeds, which are "layman" concepts. (I'm finding it hard to come up with an example, because most of my examples depend on the reference frame)
I enjoyed it anyway, from my nontechnical perspective.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I wouldn't say acceleration and force are too different because actually as Newton states F=ma, they are very related. Also I think what Luke Palmer meant is that acceleration is easier to expireience in everyday life as compared to force which is a more abstract and difficult definition to imagine.
new to trolling, i see
my favourite part is that he'd never make this same video nowadays. probably because of its relative simplicity. doesn't matter though, he deserves every view he (can) get(s)
just noticed that the mass of Ve is 42.0... well played sir
Sorry but that not really hard to notice since that what it says at the end of the video
+Corry Tuskey 42.0 blaze it
And what that 42 means ?
the meaning of life according to hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy
*Ah yes gotta love a bit of Newton’s 3rd law in my spleen*
I think it would have been easier to say that the forces are the same but due to (sigma) F=ma larger masses experience less acceleration if acted on by forces of the same magnitude.
Still doesn't make sense...1) would an amoeba pull on the sun with a force equal to the sun? 2) would a million amoebas each pull with the force of the sun therefore combined they're pulling with a total force of a million suns? 3) would an amoeba next to the sun have the same effect as a sun next to the sun? 4) if an amoeba pulls on the sun with an equal and opposite force, shouldn't the sun pull with the gravitational force of an amoeba?
@@localverse I'll just drop you a hint.... Remember G(M.m)/r^2 ?
Add to that F = ma and the concept of inertia and the reason should be evident.
Marino Hernandez
1) Yes, same force different acceleration
2) Yes
3) No, two suns pulling on each other exert a larger force.
4) Yes it does but ONLY on the amoeba. Again remember force and acceleration are different. They have the same force but because the sun is so massive it barely accelerated whereas the amoeba will accelerate much faster.
@@hopp2184 it still isn't clicking...#1 says the amoeba exerts sun-identical force that isn't enough to affect sun and #3 says an actual sun has a larger force...then #4 also seems contradictory because it says an amoeba-identical force by the sun would pull the amoeba (because the sun is massive) but #2 says that a combined force of a million suns (by a million amoebas) wouldn't pull on the sun as though there were an actual million suns
Marino Hernandez it’s great that you are curious and willing to understand! Think about it using Newton’s law of gravity:
F = G * m1 * m2 / r^2
This law says that any two objects exert the same gravitational FORCE on each other. However Force = mass * acceleration so objects with a larger mass have a smaller acceleration to “compensate” for the same force.
Mathematically you can think that
a=F/m
So a larger mass means smaller acceleration but still same force.
#1 This you seem to understand. Same force but different acceleration.
#3 Newton’s law of gravity is
F = G * m1 * m2 / r^2
If you increase the mass of one object then the force becomes larger on BOTH objects. So two suns attract at a greater gravitational force than one sun and one amoeba. But they might accelerate differently.
#2/4 remember Newton’s law of gravity? In it is the term m1 * m2. If an amoeba has mass m1 and the sun has mass m2 then the mass of 1 million suns gives a different force than 1 million amoebas.
I hope this has helped you :)
Thank you RUclips for recommending me this masterpiece after 13 years
i was so taken aback by how he looked a decade ago
just remember f = ma. if anything my physics teacher tought me, is that every time we need to solve a new problem, just stick in f = ma and see what happens
yeah, f= ma plus f=G(M1*M2)/r basically tells this whole story
F - R = Ma + M`V *
@@zyadmohamed5360 no... for most problems f = ma is enough
@@bonkybonk_ow2793 yeah but It is not correct since f is the rate of change of momentum with respect to time
Ok is no-one going to talk about how the speed limit is "C" at 2:30
Why would anyone talk? Don't we all know that c is the speed limit of the universe? /s
I can now feel newton's third law in my spleen. Thank you Veritasium.
Derek has a crush on the word "inertia"
The spleen is where the learning happens!
and the heart is where we keep our feelings
Hippopocampus
Schrodinger's clownfish
Thought this said it was posted 10 months ago then young Derek popped up and I realized it was posted 10 years ago.
Did you watch the clickbait video? :)
For every action there has to be an equal and opposite reaction, but there's a little time delay between the action and reaction.
And at higher frequency in electrical systems this small time delay makes the action and reaction go in the same direction and adds up the result. At higher frequencies, the reaction don't oppose the action, it supplements it and creates more energy than what is put in the system making it an overunity system.
Oh wow the quality of your videos has improved tremendously.
I died laughing when saw there in background.... Speed Limit c
3:00 exactly what my teacher said to me... He said do you believe in Newtown' I said, I don't know 😁
I don’t think people misunderstood. People understand intuitively that the object with lower mass will orbit the object with the greater mass e.g the moon orbits the earth snd the earth orbits the sun. They would understand this as one object having greater inertia than the other despite the forces being equal with reference to F=ma. I.e to conserve F in F=ma the acceleration of the earth is much lower than the moon. They did not misunderstand, they just didn’t use the key word inertia.
i just noticed that towards=to+wards
fore wards
back wards
up wards
to wards
Similarly, they're all twowords.
Speed Limit: C
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Clever Derek!
I just noticed that when I paused the video!
Yeah, I noticed that! :D
Don't even know where my spleen is
It's just below your ribs on your left side.
same
Is not enough to know where it is, you have to feel it in your spleen.
Rugg it's uhhhhhhh........ its uhhhh, I should have paid more attention in science class.
Clear enough and although it's ten years later, some reference to the inverse square formula in this particular context would have been interesting.
OH GOD MY SPLEEN DOSE NOT HAVE FEELINGS NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Where is the beard
Anyone watching this in 2020?
It came up in my recommended.
I think the source of the misconception is from people projecting themselves to each location. Because their body would weigh less on the Moon compared to Earth, they apply the same relationship between the Moon and Earth. My students definitely do this and it can be a bit challenging to resolve the conflict.
Damn Derek you look way different without your beard
You look really different without your beard...
Has anyone noticed that board behind of speed limit 1:49😂🧐
Recommended only after a decade.
Thank you RUclips,it was informative
I don't even know where my spleen is...
Well then, feel it somewhere else inside you!
its on the left side... behind the lower most ribs
Google Translate says you call it the σπλήνα, in Greek. Not surprised, it is roughly a cognate with the English word. Probably originally a word in Greek.
Derek you beautiful bastard, you did it. You broke the algorithm!
WARP DRIVE I just broke your speed limit... or was it space that broke c?
+Merik Malhads What a random comment XD
10 years, recommended by YT. Derek definitely cracked the algorithm.