You are ragebaiting using bad faith anecdotes. Everyone knows that in the *majority* of cases men bring home almost all the money and most of the women in their lives didn't have a large role in those men getting to that point. You say "These men aren't chomping at the bit to pull out their checkbook when the relationship doesn't work out." Who would? It's a failed relationship. When is the last time you thought it was a smart idea to continue spending money on something that didn't work? Men who lead with their wallet should be prepared for the entire relationship to be based on transaction instead of genuine interest. It seems you're one of those girls, as you admit word for word "Money before men." Women who value money more than the relationship itself are the reason prenups are a no-brainer for men.
If he wants her to stay home, she is contributing and he has taken on financial responsibility for, whether the relationship works or not. She's sacrificed what she could have earned for him and if she's had his children, she's sacrificed a lot more. Quite often, women encourage and help men to succeed, financially as well as with words and actions. She isn't financially valueless just because she doesn't do a 9 to 5. Marriage is a contract and it includes financial responsibility. When mackenzie bezos got 38 billion in the divorce settlement, some people said she didn't deserve it. She absolutely did, because she started that business with him and propelled it forward, then sacrificed it to give him children. Why would any man want to see the mother of their children and children struggle financially, just because the relationship didn't work. He still made a commitment to her and has a responsibility to his children. Men claim to want a sahm until they have to foot the bill when the marriage end's. It's usually the man's neglect, cheating and various other bad behaviours that end marriages anyway.
@@susanplatt5331 then get the f*** off your ass and earn money. youll need it for the vet who takes care of your cats. women like you make hell for this planet. you werent born to just sit around, live off of a mans money and leave whenever you want with half his assets. f*** off. also. asking for compensation for a "sacrifice" is not how sacrifice works.
I have no reason to think that anything that you said is more than anecdotal in nature. If the only people you are talking to are the people who were not treated well and of course all of your information is going to say that they were not treated well. If you are going to throw every man on the same cross then you had better have information that gives statistical significance to your claims.
F…..ools off we know the truth -all of us even your father will set him up well before you’re mother when they got divorced dont try to be nice dude when you know most men even you will do the same shi…t to the mother of your children
While I agree with you that there is bias involved in her experience, can you promise that you don't go on men's channels and support their unstatistical anecdotes? Women need to hear these messages, especially if they have not been working to raise children during their marriage. She's just trying to help women not be destroyed.
Cautioning people about potential pitfalls in personal relationships is helpful. Demonizing every man does a disservice to anyone who does not merit it. Presenting information out of balance discredits the presenter. I am who I am and say what I say consistently and as much as is humanly possible, without bias.
But what did these women do, *exactly,* to make their husbands the men they are? You have to include that if you want to make that argument in good faith. Did they personally raise their kids? Were they critically involved in their husband's companies? Were they investors? Or, more broadly speaking, did these husbands live off their wives' money during the initial stages of the relationship, and that's what gave them a shot at establishing their business? Because if none of that is true, the ground is getting pretty thin here. Just because you didn't work your own day-job doesn't mean you payed a vital contribution to your husband's success.
So, building your home, cooking,cleaning and carrying,giving birth to kids, looking after them and the house means nothing?? If she would count the hours it would surely be more than the husbands. So you suggest both spouses should have a day job so that no one remains at loss when separated?? If so, don’t whine her about the traditional housework and cleaning and looking after children more than you are willing to do cause she also grinds outside the home
@@jiyarahman1698 We agree on that *childcare* should be properly rewarded, but other than that, you're missing the point. We don't know if these women did any of that, to any degree. Everyone can make a stand and claim they've made their husband into the man he is, but if you do, you need to be able to back that up with examples. Because we know of just as many stories from women who would just live off their husband's money and would do nothing but go shopping and partying all the time, which we would propably agree isn't contributing anything. And without giving proper example, we cannot judge what's the case here.
@@jiyarahman1698 Dr Phil says domestic duties plus child rearing is the equivalent of two full time jobs. Also, the research says a man makes more money when his wife takes care of the home and kids. Not that I advocate for that, but it just shows another extra advantage that the man is getting in the mix.
@@BunnyRabit-yo3lx Look, I don't know what these women did or not did. I don't know it because the person posting the video doesn't share it. That's all I'm insisting on. Because the easiest way to spot a liar is that they will tell you the meaning of an event, but not the facts. Like, when someone is accused of having cheated, the defense will sometimes be: "But it's been all innocent!" - and then they won't tell you what they did. We're only getting told the meaning of what these women did: They made their husbands into the men they are and were instrumental in their financial success. Alright. Could be the case. But we don't know if that is what actually happened here. When it's so obvious to the person making that claim, then it should be easy to point to examples that prove their point. Befor that happened, we only know what they want us to think about these women.
no wonder you haven't seen it being set up for life after divorce would just be very unfair, i've never seen a man set up for life after a divorce. don't know the details of the cases your talking about, but from what i've seen there is only risk for a man to get married and everything to gain for the other.
So set up your relationship basically betting that it will end in divorce? This is the attitude and main reason why divorce is such a lucrative business. Prenup is easy, #1 If you cheat you get nothing, #2 If you file for divorce just because you don't want to work on the issues, you get what you came in with, #3 If you have honestly tried to fix things, you get what you came in with and half of what a shared business is worth for 2 years, #4 If there are children involved, joint custody with a half and half time and you can't move out of State just to deny time, no support needed since it is joint custody, #5 If the marriage doesn't last more than 5 years and no children are involved you get what you came in with and half of the profits for 1 year. Instead of rewarding the divorce with the ability to keep taking money you haven't earned indefinitely, you should go into it knowing that your vows should have meant more than a paycheck in the end that you probably planned from the start.
He can get a prenup if he needs one. Not like he can't afford legal advice. That's what prenups are for. Otherwise, the law stands. If you don't like it get the law changed.
Fully agree. Marriage is transactional these days. Both men and women need to keep that in mind. Hell, why even get married. Someone justify what you get with marriage transactionally.
People come to you because they have problems. That's why you don't see the couples that don't have problems when they split up. Kinda crazy I had to explain that to you. Still, you give decent advice, don't be a push-over if things don't work out.
Doesn’t it makes sense that these marriages ended. You probably don’t work with couples where there were good intentions on both sides, so you only see the negatives
So who’s leaving who? If a trad wife leaves at no fault of the husband the trad wife deserves half? If you answered yes your wrong. A trad wife doesn’t leave.
Here's my advice to the whiny men in the comments: Let your spouse work, stay at home wife/mom= alimony(either rehabilitative/transitional/durational/permanent) depending on the age of the parties, duration of the marriage, income, ability to pay and marital standard of living! Also stay at home mom/dad= primary custody, congratulations you just became a every other weekend dad with a couple of hours a week of visitation, with just that decision, oh dont forget the child support that comes with that! Get a cohabitation agreement instead of married if you live in state that does recognize common law marriage. If you live in a state that doesn't recognize common law marriage then you can cohabitatate without any problems! Protect your assets/properties/investments, you worked hard for them! ✌️
6 million is more than I and most people will make in their life time or even two life times and you want me to feel bad for them?
That's not the point.
how do i unwatch this
You are ragebaiting using bad faith anecdotes. Everyone knows that in the *majority* of cases men bring home almost all the money and most of the women in their lives didn't have a large role in those men getting to that point. You say "These men aren't chomping at the bit to pull out their checkbook when the relationship doesn't work out." Who would? It's a failed relationship. When is the last time you thought it was a smart idea to continue spending money on something that didn't work? Men who lead with their wallet should be prepared for the entire relationship to be based on transaction instead of genuine interest. It seems you're one of those girls, as you admit word for word "Money before men."
Women who value money more than the relationship itself are the reason prenups are a no-brainer for men.
If he wants her to stay home, she is contributing and he has taken on financial responsibility for, whether the relationship works or not. She's sacrificed what she could have earned for him and if she's had his children, she's sacrificed a lot more. Quite often, women encourage and help men to succeed, financially as well as with words and actions. She isn't financially valueless just because she doesn't do a 9 to 5. Marriage is a contract and it includes financial responsibility. When mackenzie bezos got 38 billion in the divorce settlement, some people said she didn't deserve it. She absolutely did, because she started that business with him and propelled it forward, then sacrificed it to give him children. Why would any man want to see the mother of their children and children struggle financially, just because the relationship didn't work. He still made a commitment to her and has a responsibility to his children. Men claim to want a sahm until they have to foot the bill when the marriage end's. It's usually the man's neglect, cheating and various other bad behaviours that end marriages anyway.
@@susanplatt5331 then get the f*** off your ass and earn money. youll need it for the vet who takes care of your cats. women like you make hell for this planet. you werent born to just sit around, live off of a mans money and leave whenever you want with half his assets. f*** off. also. asking for compensation for a "sacrifice" is not how sacrifice works.
Actually the research says that women ARE the reason for many men getting where they are. Science!
I have no reason to think that anything that you said is more than anecdotal in nature. If the only people you are talking to are the people who were not treated well and of course all of your information is going to say that they were not treated well. If you are going to throw every man on the same cross then you had better have information that gives statistical significance to your claims.
F…..ools off we know the truth -all of us even your father will set him up well before you’re mother when they got divorced dont try to be nice dude when you know most men even you will do the same shi…t to the mother of your children
While I agree with you that there is bias involved in her experience, can you promise that you don't go on men's channels and support their unstatistical anecdotes? Women need to hear these messages, especially if they have not been working to raise children during their marriage. She's just trying to help women not be destroyed.
Cautioning people about potential pitfalls in personal relationships is helpful. Demonizing every man does a disservice to anyone who does not merit it. Presenting information out of balance discredits the presenter. I am who I am and say what I say consistently and as much as is humanly possible, without bias.
what is this slop youtube is trying to feed me?
But what did these women do, *exactly,* to make their husbands the men they are?
You have to include that if you want to make that argument in good faith.
Did they personally raise their kids?
Were they critically involved in their husband's companies?
Were they investors?
Or, more broadly speaking, did these husbands live off their wives' money during the initial stages of the relationship, and that's what gave them a shot at establishing their business?
Because if none of that is true, the ground is getting pretty thin here.
Just because you didn't work your own day-job doesn't mean you payed a vital contribution to your husband's success.
So, building your home, cooking,cleaning and carrying,giving birth to kids, looking after them and the house means nothing?? If she would count the hours it would surely be more than the husbands. So you suggest both spouses should have a day job so that no one remains at loss when separated?? If so, don’t whine her about the traditional housework and cleaning and looking after children more than you are willing to do cause she also grinds outside the home
@@jiyarahman1698 We agree on that *childcare* should be properly rewarded, but other than that, you're missing the point.
We don't know if these women did any of that, to any degree. Everyone can make a stand and claim they've made their husband into the man he is, but if you do, you need to be able to back that up with examples.
Because we know of just as many stories from women who would just live off their husband's money and would do nothing but go shopping and partying all the time, which we would propably agree isn't contributing anything.
And without giving proper example, we cannot judge what's the case here.
@@jiyarahman1698 Dr Phil says domestic duties plus child rearing is the equivalent of two full time jobs. Also, the research says a man makes more money when his wife takes care of the home and kids. Not that I advocate for that, but it just shows another extra advantage that the man is getting in the mix.
@@gaiusbaltar8915 It seems to be potentially a problem with some women in America. But don't paint all women with the same brush.
@@BunnyRabit-yo3lx Look, I don't know what these women did or not did. I don't know it because the person posting the video doesn't share it. That's all I'm insisting on.
Because the easiest way to spot a liar is that they will tell you the meaning of an event, but not the facts.
Like, when someone is accused of having cheated, the defense will sometimes be: "But it's been all innocent!" - and then they won't tell you what they did.
We're only getting told the meaning of what these women did: They made their husbands into the men they are and were instrumental in their financial success.
Alright. Could be the case. But we don't know if that is what actually happened here. When it's so obvious to the person making that claim, then it should be easy to point to examples that prove their point. Befor that happened, we only know what they want us to think about these women.
Nobody cares about how you feel.
I love how all of the comments are stomping out this dumpster fire lol
youtube don’t recommend this nonsense again
no wonder you haven't seen it being set up for life after divorce would just be very unfair, i've never seen a man set up for life after a divorce. don't know the details of the cases your talking about, but from what i've seen there is only risk for a man to get married and everything to gain for the other.
now make a video about the demon women youve seen during divorce negotiations lol
So set up your relationship basically betting that it will end in divorce? This is the attitude and main reason why divorce is such a lucrative business. Prenup is easy, #1 If you cheat you get nothing, #2 If you file for divorce just because you don't want to work on the issues, you get what you came in with, #3 If you have honestly tried to fix things, you get what you came in with and half of what a shared business is worth for 2 years, #4 If there are children involved, joint custody with a half and half time and you can't move out of State just to deny time, no support needed since it is joint custody, #5 If the marriage doesn't last more than 5 years and no children are involved you get what you came in with and half of the profits for 1 year. Instead of rewarding the divorce with the ability to keep taking money you haven't earned indefinitely, you should go into it knowing that your vows should have meant more than a paycheck in the end that you probably planned from the start.
If the guy already had 60M then she is NOT and should NOT be entitled to 50% of that! Try making 30M in one lifetime and lemme know how that works.
He can get a prenup if he needs one. Not like he can't afford legal advice. That's what prenups are for. Otherwise, the law stands. If you don't like it get the law changed.
Fully agree. Marriage is transactional these days. Both men and women need to keep that in mind. Hell, why even get married. Someone justify what you get with marriage transactionally.
Missing the point completely
People come to you because they have problems. That's why you don't see the couples that don't have problems when they split up. Kinda crazy I had to explain that to you. Still, you give decent advice, don't be a push-over if things don't work out.
Doesn’t it makes sense that these marriages ended. You probably don’t work with couples where there were good intentions on both sides, so you only see the negatives
Here is my advice: don’t try to guess people’s motivations and thoughts, especially in simplistic ways.
its pretty simple actually. greed. plain. simple greed. no love here. i do agree with your advice. they aint worth a single second on a single neuron
Awwww! Six million dollars isn’t enough? Cry me a river. 🙄
lol @TradWife hashtag with this one
This is why we are all fucked
So who’s leaving who? If a trad wife leaves at no fault of the husband the trad wife deserves half? If you answered yes your wrong. A trad wife doesn’t leave.
A trad wife leaves when she's not treated well.
@@helgaioannidis9365 define "treated well"
You must not see how women are these days lol , most not all .
Don’t get divorced??
This woman's voice icky
Time to un recommend this channel
So many jobs exist primarily to separate men from their money. She’s a primary example
Here's my advice to the whiny men in the comments:
Let your spouse work, stay at home wife/mom= alimony(either rehabilitative/transitional/durational/permanent) depending on the age of the parties, duration of the marriage, income, ability to pay and marital standard of living!
Also stay at home mom/dad= primary custody, congratulations you just became a every other weekend dad with a couple of hours a week of visitation, with just that decision, oh dont forget the child support that comes with that!
Get a cohabitation agreement instead of married if you live in state that does recognize common law marriage.
If you live in a state that doesn't recognize common law marriage then you can cohabitatate without any problems!
Protect your assets/properties/investments, you worked hard for them! ✌️