Dam was there speed bumps or pot holes he'll I flew on one from Indy to ATL and it didn't bounce around like that I can't believe they had enough take off speed with all the pot holes
That turbulence around the start of the takeoff roll seemed to be quite severe. Glad to see that the "runway turbulence" conditions subsided later on, prior to V1 and rotate.
717's are still flying? I worked at Boeing for a little bit. I thought Spain was last country that had then and they were going to be retired. I guess I am wrong.
@@rodmanser7573 Not true... The CRJ700 series has had no accidents. Its roughly the same age. The impressive part is that there are about 9 times more CRJ700/900s built than the 717 and they fly way more legs a day. Still having the same safety record.
@@rodmanser7573 I'm not splitting hairs, I am saying your claims of it being the only aircraft to have no accidents is incorrect. And no, it was not a CRJ700 or 900 in either of those situations. If you are trying to lump the 700/900 in with the 200 because that's the variant it came from, than I can easily do so with the 717 since it was derived from the DC-9/MD-80 which has had accidents again disproving any argument you're trying to make. Please do research before further commenting.
@@rodmanser7573 Haha if all the "key board warriors" are "out trying to make you look like you're full of shit" then maybe it's you that is and not them. And then to go around calling people A-holes because you cant admit you're wrong... Anyways, congrats on being one of the few people banned from this channel.
I stand corrected. My friend who is a 717 FO said they dont use it on take off however I do see the APU indication on the display. You cant really see the master switch position very well since its a 3 position switch but if you pause it at the right time, it would appear the bleed switch is in the down position which would be on. I know it was common on the CRJ to do so so you would have less of a load on the engine. It could have something to do with LGA having such short runways which is why they used it in this case
![[LAST ONE] B777 JFK 🇺🇸 New York | LANDING 04R | 4K Cockpit View | ATC & Crew Communications](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6MADRBeTbfM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LAST ONE] B777 JFK 🇺🇸 New York | LANDING 04R | 4K Cockpit View | ATC & Crew Communications](/img/tr.png)
Shame there wasn't more. Those things go up like rockets.
155 plus a prototype that was cut up. Now DL has 3 off the spec and another 5 or so were parted out.
The 717 has some power!
21,400 x 2 available at SL ISA +25°
If you really want to see Power, watch a 777-300
@@planeandsimplexplainedpower to weight ratio
I fly the MD11 and this is spitting image.
Those are freaky reminds me too much of DC 10
@@grand_vacation They're not freaky.... neither is the DC-10.
same Honeywell VIA 2000 with FCCs & FMS and synoptic displays.
MD-11 does not use VIA avionics... MD-10 and 717 do.
You can tell it's LGA by how bumpy the runway is
If you look close you can probably see a rat running across the runway
@@MTAviationPhotoFilm lool with a slice of pizza in his mouth.
Can you hear the engines from the flight deck? Such a bummer if you cant. The 717 is a great sounding plane!
Wow the 717 cockpit looks nice
WOW !NICE CLIP AND THX 4 POSTING !
Same as the MD-11 Cockpit
Dam was there speed bumps or pot holes he'll I flew on one from Indy to ATL and it didn't bounce around like that I can't believe they had enough take off speed with all the pot holes
runways dont get pot holes those are the embedded marker lights along the center line
You notice the runway markers more in the cockpit as they are literally on top of the nose landing gear.
No, this is just that runways really bad condition. Those were not from the lights
The first portion of the takeoff roll on LaGuardia’s 13 is pretty rough until you get past the runway 04/22 intersection!
Love the 20deg deck angle on departure in the MD/717's. They were real rockets if light.
still are and yes PLI = 20 ° ANU
That turbulence around the start of the takeoff roll seemed to be quite severe. Glad to see that the "runway turbulence" conditions subsided later on, prior to V1 and rotate.
It's not as bad as it used to be. The 13/22 runway intersections were really rough. They were referred to as the 100kt. hump.
Dang the 717 takes off like a boss! Even quicker then the ERJ's and CRJ's. And from what I heard the pilots love flying them too.
Honestly it’s not my favorite. Not very stable, could use longer wings. I probably won’t miss them when they are gone.
Probably one of the last 717 to takeoff or land at LGA, there’s no more coming here 😢
717's are still flying? I worked at Boeing for a little bit. I thought Spain was last country that had then and they were going to be retired. I guess I am wrong.
Both Delta and Hawaiian fly them in the US as well as QantasLink in Australia
Oh I wish I could try this myself!! 👍👍
Nice video!
Great video!!
Thanks
13 still bumpy as usual I see
My goodness that runway sounds atrocious 🥴
nice
Thanks
yes i like it
Looks like an MD 11 cockpit.
md 95 and the md 11 were made around the same time
The 717 is known by insiders as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95
The MD-11 is a much larger cockpit and it doesn't have a center windshield pane.
The MD 95 was designed with the idea of their being commonality in the cockpits for all of the newer aircraft. That's why they look very similar
boeing 717/MD90 is the most underrated aircraft in the aviation community due how rare this aircraft is.
also only type with no accidents in 21 year history [only minor ground mishaps due to handling]
@@rodmanser7573 Not true... The CRJ700 series has had no accidents. Its roughly the same age. The impressive part is that there are about 9 times more CRJ700/900s built than the 717 and they fly way more legs a day. Still having the same safety record.
@@rodmanser7573 I'm not splitting hairs, I am saying your claims of it being the only aircraft to have no accidents is incorrect. And no, it was not a CRJ700 or 900 in either of those situations. If you are trying to lump the 700/900 in with the 200 because that's the variant it came from, than I can easily do so with the 717 since it was derived from the DC-9/MD-80 which has had accidents again disproving any argument you're trying to make. Please do research before further commenting.
@@rodmanser7573 Haha if all the "key board warriors" are "out trying to make you look like you're full of shit" then maybe it's you that is and not them. And then to go around calling people A-holes because you cant admit you're wrong... Anyways, congrats on being one of the few people banned from this channel.
Was the APU still on??
No. Apu is required to be off during take off on the 717 or it will mess up the bleed config
@@MTAviationPhotoFilm oh ok i noticed the APU panel on 717 was still on cause usually it will turns off after the APU shuts down
I stand corrected. My friend who is a 717 FO said they dont use it on take off however I do see the APU indication on the display. You cant really see the master switch position very well since its a 3 position switch but if you pause it at the right time, it would appear the bleed switch is in the down position which would be on. I know it was common on the CRJ to do so so you would have less of a load on the engine. It could have something to do with LGA having such short runways which is why they used it in this case
A generator could be deferred. If that is the case the apu is required to be on the entire flight
New York has a problem with paving roads and airport runways.