I used to suffer severely from sick building syndrome. It's where the air conditioning would circulate everyone's sickness all through the building. During WFH never got sick once.
Reality is yes and no - if your company has very good project management Systems and staff that actually follow them - yes, remote work if great. But if you have no structure and bad management - it will cause only more slacking and procrastination of your staff.
Fire them and hire new ones. Also those who didnt work at the office , wont work from home either. And i guess what you want is micromanagment. Which only drive those who actually work to look for work elsewhere. Bexause hou can tell when someone is not doing his job, when the deadlines are not met for example etc etc. Come on now.
There's no point reasoning. Either the employees or the employers get their way or something inbetween. That's literally how a free market works. It has nothing to do with values, its all lipservice. As employees we want the best deal for us. For employers they want the best deal for them. Let it play out however it does even if both sides are disingenuous.
Well that’s true, hybrid options seem to be quite promising for certain roles and industries. But overall you’re right, the employees and employers that simply do not see eye to eye will not work with each other. Employees fighting the RTO mandates will get fired and employers that want fully in office will now likely have to pay a premium to attract talent
At home i sometimes have less focus due to fact i have plenty of distractions available. But i like the privacy it gives me. If i can do all the things in a day at home i'm more happy to do it from home.
Haha it certainly can be! But so can office space for the sake of it. There is no clear answer in general. Each industry and role has vastly different needs so it’s pointless to make blanket statements. What’s clear is that remote jobs (in general) will typically pay less, have less career advancement opportunities a higher turnover and likelihood of outsourcing. Productivity is difficult to say as there’s lots of studies that support both sides. In office, it’s a lot easier collaborate, create a baseline expectation of productivity and have oversight on employees. Does a back office document processor have to be in office 5 days a week? No, probably not. Should an engineering team? Yes.
I used to suffer severely from sick building syndrome. It's where the air conditioning would circulate everyone's sickness all through the building. During WFH never got sick once.
I know that exact feeling…plus my office is freezing all the time.
Sounds like an immune system problem not a building problem
@domista123 that's a really dumb take
Sounds like you’re soft
@@AydanDurant and you look like you wear Lycra for fun.
Its huge of Musk talking about morals
0:21 It's rich coming from a guy who spends his workday shit posting.
Making people who can wfh work at their home will make it easier commute for people who can’t (manufacturing, service industries) easier
Reality is yes and no - if your company has very good project management Systems and staff that actually follow them - yes, remote work if great.
But if you have no structure and bad management - it will cause only more slacking and procrastination of your staff.
Fire them and hire new ones.
Also those who didnt work at the office , wont work from home either.
And i guess what you want is micromanagment. Which only drive those who actually work to look for work elsewhere. Bexause hou can tell when someone is not doing his job, when the deadlines are not met for example etc etc. Come on now.
As my own boss working from my home it make me feel so happy about my life choice
Just a big PsyOp and traumatizing society
There's no point reasoning. Either the employees or the employers get their way or something inbetween.
That's literally how a free market works. It has nothing to do with values, its all lipservice.
As employees we want the best deal for us.
For employers they want the best deal for them.
Let it play out however it does even if both sides are disingenuous.
Well that’s true, hybrid options seem to be quite promising for certain roles and industries. But overall you’re right, the employees and employers that simply do not see eye to eye will not work with each other. Employees fighting the RTO mandates will get fired and employers that want fully in office will now likely have to pay a premium to attract talent
I don't know man, I'm a business owner and I prefer my guys in the office. Its more collaborative and active.
Yep. That’s mentioned in the video!
What does your business do? Maybe its about your industry and the type of work.
Not everything needs to be remote, but what can be, should be.
As someone who has never worked in an office, I'd rather work in an office. Want to keep that work-life separation.
Just as productive is a lie.
At home i sometimes have less focus due to fact i have plenty of distractions available. But i like the privacy it gives me. If i can do all the things in a day at home i'm more happy to do it from home.
i love the Silicon Valley clips
Nah, working from home is a waste of resources
Haha it certainly can be! But so can office space for the sake of it. There is no clear answer in general. Each industry and role has vastly different needs so it’s pointless to make blanket statements. What’s clear is that remote jobs (in general) will typically pay less, have less career advancement opportunities a higher turnover and likelihood of outsourcing. Productivity is difficult to say as there’s lots of studies that support both sides. In office, it’s a lot easier collaborate, create a baseline expectation of productivity and have oversight on employees. Does a back office document processor have to be in office 5 days a week? No, probably not. Should an engineering team? Yes.